DOCSLIB.ORG

Community Health and Economic Prosperity Engaging Businesses As Stewards and Stakeholders— a Report of the Surgeon General

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Community Health and Economic Prosperity Engaging Businesses As Stewards and Stakeholders— a Report of the Surgeon General Community Health and Economic Prosperity Engaging Businesses as Stewards and Stakeholders— A Report of the Surgeon General U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Persons using assistive technology may not be able to fully access information in this file. For assistance, please contact the Office of the Surgeon General at [email protected]. Community Health and Economic Prosperity Engaging Businesses as Stewards and Stakeholders— A Report of the Surgeon General JANUARY 2021 This report identifies, for illustrative purposes, the names of businesses and organizations and highlights business practices and performance. Such identification does not (a) suggest that every aspect of the business, organization, practice, or performance is exemplary or (b) constitute endorsement by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Further, any views expressed by such businesses or organizations do not necessarily represent the views or positions of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. National Library of Medicine Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: United States. Public Health Service. Office of the Surgeon General, issuing body. Title: Community Health and Economic Prosperity: Engaging Businesses as Stewards and Stakeholders—A Report of the Surgeon General. Description: Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Office of the Surgeon General; Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2021. | Includes bibliographical references. Subjects: MESH: Community Health Planning—Economics. | Population Health. | Economic Development. | Public-Private Sector Partnerships. | Economic Factors. | Commerce. | United States. Classification: NLM WA 546 AA1 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Office of the Associate Director for Policy and Strategy For more information about Surgeon General’s reports, visit http://www.surgeongeneral.gov. To download copies of this document, go to http://www.hhs.gov/surgeongeneral/reports- and-publications/index.html. Suggested Citation U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2021). Community health and economic prosperity: Engaging businesses as stewards and stakeholders—A report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Office of the Associate Director for Policy and Strategy. Message From Alex M. Azar II Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services The past year was one of the most challenging that America has faced in modern times. The COVID-19 pandemic is one of the greatest public health threats ever to confront our country. It has devastated our economy and driven unemployment to record highs. These challenges remind us that health and the economy are so often linked together. Congress passed historic levels of support to address the economic costs of the pandemic and to fund the public health response, but low-income Americans have not seen the full benefit of the economic recovery and continue to suffer more severe illness from COVID-19, in part because of preexisting health conditions they experience at rates that are higher than those among Americans who are better off. Health disparities arise not just from unequal access to healthcare but also from unequal access to economic opportunity, meaningful work, stable families, livable housing, reliable transportation, quality education, and thriving communities. Healthier people means a stronger economy, but a stronger economy also means healthier people. Those of us who care about both health and prosperity—in the public and private sectors—must recognize this connection and engage on both causes. That is the core insight of this historic publication, Community Health and Economic Prosperity: Engaging Businesses as Stewards and Stakeholders—A Report of the Surgeon General. This effort emphasizes the inextricable and mutually reinforcing link between physical, mental, and community health and economic prosperity. It calls on private sector businesses, in particular, to engage with and invest in communities to improve health and foster prosperity. Of the social determinants of health that our department focuses on, one of the greatest is simply access to economic opportunity. We know that economic opportunity—as well as the stable families, healthy environments, and strong communities it supports (what this report calls the “vital conditions”)—is good for health. But too many Americans are born into and grow up in low-opportunity neighborhoods. This creates costs for businesses and for society, as so many Americans never achieve their potential in the workforce, are unable to reach independence, and see their health and the health of their loved ones suffer as a result. By working together, with deep engagement from the private sector, we can build a healthier society that is rich with opportunity for everyone. This Surgeon General’s report offers a way forward for the United States to recover from the COVID-19 pandemic and to build a healthier, more prosperous future for all Americans. MESSAGE FROM ALEX M. AZAR II iii Acknowledgments This report was prepared by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under the general direction of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Office of the Director, Office of the Associate Director for Policy and Strategy. Vice Admiral (VADM) Jerome M. Adams, MD, MPH, Surgeon General, U.S. Public Health Service, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, Office of the Surgeon General, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC. Robert R. Redfield, MD, Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia. Robin M. Ikeda, MD, MPH, Associate Director for Policy and Strategy, Office of the Associate Director for Policy and Strategy, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia. Richard W. Puddy, PhD, MPH, Director, Policy Research, Analysis, and Development Office, Office of the Associate Director for Policy and Strategy, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia. Peter Briss, MD, MPH, Medical Director, Office of Medicine and Science, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia. James E. Kucik, PhD, MPH, Deputy Director, Policy Research, Analysis, and Development Office, Office of the Associate Director for Policy and Strategy, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia. Diane M. Hall, PhD, MSEd, Senior Scientist for Policy and Strategy, Policy Research, Analysis, and Development Office, Office of the Associate Director for Policy and Strategy, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia. Martin J. Vincent, PhD, MBA, Health Scientist and Senior Advisor, Policy Research, Analysis, and Development Office, Office of the Associate Director for Policy and Strategy, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia. Senior Scientific Editors Ursula Bauer, PhD, MPH, Senior Advisor, Office of the Deputy Director for Non-Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia. Greg Fairchild, PhD, MBA, MPhil, Isidore Horween Research Associate Professor of Business Administration, Associate Dean for Washington, DC, Area Initiatives and Academic Director ACKNOWLEDGMENTS v of Public Policy and Entrepreneurship, University of Virginia Darden School of Business, Charlottesville, Virginia. Doug Jutte, MD, MPH, Executive Director, Build Healthy Places Network; Associate Professor, University of California, Berkeley, School of Public Health; San Francisco, California. Contributing Authors Salma M. Abdalla, MBBS, MPH, Research Fellow, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts. Dolores Acevedo-Garcia, PhD, Professor of Human Development and Social Policy and Director of the Institute for Child, Youth and Family Policy at the Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts. Lawrence Bowdish, PhD, Senior Director, Research and Issue Networks, U.S. Chamber of Commerce Foundation, Washington, DC. Antony Bugg-Levine, MPA, Chief Executive Officer, Nonprofit Finance Fund, New York, New York. Laura Choi, MPP, Senior Research Associate, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, San Francisco, California. Elyse Cohen, MPH, Senior Director of Food, Health, and Wellness Programs, U.S. Chamber of Commerce Foundation, Washington, DC. Kimberlee Cornett, MA, Director, Impact Investments, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Washington, DC. Marc DeCourcey, Senior Vice President, U.S. Chamber of Commerce Foundation, Washington, DC. Karen B. DeSalvo, MD, MPH, MSc, Chief Health Officer, Google Health, New Orleans, Louisiana. Annie Donovan, MBA, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Local Initiatives Support Corporation, New York, New York. Tory Flynn, MA, Vice President of Communications, Athene, West Des Moines, Iowa. Sandro Galea, MD, MPH, DrPH, Dean, Robert A. Knox Professor, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts. Marcela Hawn, MA, Senior Vice President, Chief Communications Officer, Centene Corporation, St. Louis, Missouri. Maurice Jones, JD, President and Chief Executive Officer, Local Initiatives Support Corporation, New York, New York. vi Community Health and Economic Prosperity: Engaging Businesses as Stewards and Stakeholders—A
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Community Health Worker Intervention in a Population of Patients with Multiple Chronic Diseases: Study Design and Protocol
    Contemporary Clinical Trials 53 (2017) 115–121 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Contemporary Clinical Trials journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/conclintrial A randomized controlled trial of a community health worker intervention in a population of patients with multiple chronic diseases: Study design and protocol Shreya Kangovi a,b,⁎, Nandita Mitra c, Lindsey Turr a, Hairong Huo a,DavidGrandea, Judith A. Long a,d a Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Division of General Internal Medicine, Philadelphia 19104, PA, United States b Penn Center for Community Health Workers, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia 19104, PA, United States c Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Philadelphia 19104, PA, United States d Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA, Philadelphia 19104, PA, United States article info abstract Article history: Upstream interventions – e.g. housing programs and community health worker interventions– address socioeco- Received 14 September 2016 nomic and behavioral factors that influence health outcomes across diseases. Studying these types of interven- Received in revised form 2 December 2016 tions in clinical trials raises a methodological challenge: how should researchers measure the effect of an Accepted 3 December 2016 upstream intervention in a sample of patients with different diseases? This paper addresses this question using Available online 10 December 2016 an illustrative protocol of a randomized controlled trial of collaborative-goal setting versus goal-setting plus com- munity health worker support among patients multiple chronic diseases: diabetes, obesity, hypertension and to- Keywords: Randomized controlled trial bacco dependence. Upstream medicine At study enrollment, patients met with their primary care providers to select one of their chronic diseases to focus Socioeconomic determinants on during the study, and to collaboratively set a goal for that disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Health Department Internships
    Local Public Health Organizations The following links go to pages for employment, volunteering and internships for local public health departments, public health districts and local health units in Texas. A ● Abilene Taylor-County Public Health District ● Addison (City of) Developmental Services Department ● Alamo Heights (City of) ● Alice (City of) Community Development Department ● Allen (City of) Environmental Services ● Amarillo Area Public Health District ● Andrews City-CO Health Department ● Angelina County and Cities Health District ● Aransas County Environmental Health ● Arlington (City of) Environmental Health Division ● Austin Public Health B ● Balcones Heights (City of) Public Health ● Bastrop County Environmental & Sanitation Services ● Baytown Health Department ● Beaumont Public Health Department ● Bee County Health Department ● Beeville (City of) Development Services Department ● Bell County Health Department 1 Texas Health and Human Services ● hhs.texas.gov ● Bellaire (City of) ● Big Lake (City of) ● Blanco County Environmental Services ● Bosque County Courthouse ● Brady (City of) Health Inspector Office ● Brazoria County Health Department ● Brazos County Health Department ● Brown County-City of Brownwood Health Department ● Brownsville (City of) Health Department ● Burleson (City of) Environmental: volunteering, employment ● Burleson County Environmental ● Burnet County Environmental Services C ● Caldwell County Sanitation ● Cameron County Public Health ● Carrollton (City of) Environmental Svcs: volunteering, employment
    [Show full text]
  • Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care, Updated 2010
    RACIAL AND ETHNIC DISPARITIES IN HEALTH CARE, UPDATED 2010 American College of Physicians A Position Paper 2010 Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care A Summary of a Position Paper Approved by the ACP Board of Regents, April 2010 What Are the Sources of Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care? The Institute of Medicine defines disparities as “racial or ethnic differences in the quality of health care that are not due to access-related factors or clinical needs, preferences, and appropriateness of intervention.” Racial and ethnic minorities tend to receive poorer quality care compared with nonminorities, even when access-related factors, such as insurance status and income, are controlled. The sources of racial and ethnic health care disparities include differences in geography, lack of access to adequate health coverage, communication difficulties between patient and provider, cultural barriers, provider stereotyping, and lack of access to providers. In addition, disparities in the health care system contribute to the overall disparities in health status that affect racial and ethnic minorities. Why is it Important to Correct These Disparities? The problem of racial and ethnic health care disparities is highlighted in various statistics: • Minorities have less access to health care than whites. The level of uninsurance for Hispanics is 34% compared with 13% among whites. • Native Americans and Native Alaskans more often lack prenatal care in the first trimester. • Nationally, minority women are more likely to avoid a doctor’s visit due to cost. • Racial and ethnic minority Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with dementia are 30% less likely than whites to use antidementia medications.
    [Show full text]
  • Arsenic, Air Pollution, and Threats to Traditional Values of the Hopi Tribe
    Journal of Community Health (2019) 44:896–902 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-019-00627-8 ORIGINAL PAPER Environmental Risk Perceptions and Community Health: Arsenic, Air Pollution, and Threats to Traditional Values of the Hopi Tribe Brian Mayer1 · Lorencita Joshweseoma2 · Gregory Sehongva2 Published online: 21 February 2019 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019 Abstract American Indian and Alaska Native populations experience chronic disparities in a wide range of health outcomes, many of which are associated with disproportionate exposures to environmental health hazards. In the American Southwest, many indigenous tribes experience challenges in securing access to sustainable and safe sources of drinking water, limiting air pol- lution emissions on and off tribal lands, and cleaning up hazardous contaminants left over from a legacy of natural resource extraction. To better understand how households perceive the risk of exposure to potential environmental health risks, we conducted six focus groups organized by age and geographic location on the Hopi reservation. Focus group participants (n = 41) were asked to reflect on changes in their natural and manmade environment and how their health might be influ- enced by any potential changes. By investigating these environmental risk perceptions, we were able to identify arsenic in drinking water and indoor air quality as significant exposures of concern. These risk perceptions were frequently anchored in personal and familial experiences with health problems such as cancer and asthma. Older focus group participants iden- tified ongoing shifts away from tradition and cultural practices as increasing environmental health risks. Similar to other communities economically dependent on the extraction of natural resources, focus group participants described the need for behavioral modifications regarding environmental health risks rather than eliminating the sources of potential health risks entirely.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Service Workers Any People Experience Hardship and Need Help
    Helping those in need: Human service workers any people experience hardship and need help. This help is provided by M a network of agencies and organi- zations, both public and private. Staffed by human service workers, this network, and the kinds of help it offers, is as varied as the clients it serves. “Human services tend to be as broad as the needs and problems of the cli- ent base,” says Robert Olding, president of the National Organization for Human Services in Woodstock, Georgia. Human service workers help clients become more self-sufficient. They may do this by helping them learn new skills or by recom- mending resources that allow them to care for themselves or work to overcome setbacks. These workers also help clients who are unable to care for themselves, such as children and the elderly, by coordinating the provision of their basic needs. The first section of this article explains the duties of human service workers and the types of assistance they provide. The next action. Throughout the process, they provide several sections detail the populations served clients with emotional support. by, and the occupations commonly found in, human services. Another section describes Evaluate and plan some benefits and drawbacks to the work, and Working closely with the client, human the section that follows discusses the educa- service workers identify problems and cre- Colleen tion and skills needed to enter human service ate a plan for services to help the client solve Teixeira these problems. This process—which includes occupations. The final section lists sources of Moffat additional information.
    [Show full text]
  • Disparities in Health and Health Care: Five Key Questions and Answers
    March 2020 | Issue Brief Disparities in Health and Health Care: Five Key Questions and Answers Samantha Artiga, Kendal Orgera, and Olivia Pham Executive Summary 1. What are health and health care disparities? Health and health care disparities refer to differences in health and health care between groups that are closely linked with social, economic, and/or environmental disadvantage. Disparities occur across many dimensions, including race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, age, location, gender, disability status, and sexual orientation. 2. Why do health and health care disparities matter? Disparities in health and health care not only affect the groups facing disparities, but also limit overall gains in quality of care and health for the broader population and result in unnecessary costs. Addressing health disparities is increasingly important as the population becomes more diverse. It is projected that people of color will account for over half (52%) of the population in 2050. 3. What is the current status of disparities? Although the Affordable Care Act (ACA) lead to large coverage gains, some groups remain at higher risk of being uninsured, lacking access to care, and experiencing worse health outcomes. For example, as of 2018, Hispanics are two and a half times more likely to be uninsured than Whites (19.0% vs. 7.5%) and individuals with incomes below poverty are four times as likely to lack coverage as those with incomes at 400% of the federal poverty level or above (17.3% vs. 4.3%). 4. What are key initiatives to address disparities? The ACA’s coverage expansions and funding for community health centers increased access to coverage and care for many groups facing disparities, and other provisions explicitly focused on reducing disparities.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Community Engagement in Wash
    OXFAM GUIDE NOVEMBER 2016 GUIDE TO COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT IN WASH A practitioner’s guide, based on lessons from Ebola Community Health Volunteers receiving training in Clara Town, Monrovia, Liberia. Photo: Pablo Tosco/Oxfam By Eva Niederberger, Suzanne Ferron and Marion O’Reilly www.oxfam.org ABOUT THIS GUIDE This guide is a compilation of best practices and key lessons learned through Oxfam’s experience of community engagement during the 2014–15 Ebola response in Sierra Leone and Liberia. It aims to inform public health practitioners and programme teams about the design and implementation of community-centred approaches. 2 CONTENTS Acronyms .............................................................................................................................4 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................5 1.1 About this note ............................................................................................ 5 1.2 Ten key lessons .......................................................................................... 6 2. Assessing contexts .........................................................................................................7 2.1 Pre-epidemic healthcare systems .............................................................. 8 2.2 Community history and leadership dynamics ............................................. 8 2.3 Community capacity ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Security, Disease, Commerce: Ideologies of Postcolonial Global Health Nicholas B
    Special Issue: Postcolonial Technoscience ABSTRACT Public health in the United States and Western Europe has long been allied with national security and international commerce. During the 1990s, American virologists and public health experts capitalized on this historical association, arguing that ‘emerging diseases’ presented a threat to American political and economic interests. This paper investigates these arguments, which I call the ‘emerging diseases worldview’, and compares it to colonial-era ideologies of medicine and public health. Three points of comparison are emphasized: the mapping of space and relative importance of territoriality; the increasing emphasis on information and commodity exchange networks; and the transition from metaphors of conversion and a ‘civilizing mission’, to integration and international development. Although colonial and postcolonial ideologies of global health remain deeply intertwined, significant differences are becoming apparent. Keywords emerging diseases, exchange, information, networks, pharmaceuticals, public health Security, Disease, Commerce: Ideologies of Postcolonial Global Health Nicholas B. King In April 2000, the Clinton administration, citing domestic political pres- sure and awareness of an emergent international health threat, formally designated HIV/AIDS a threat to American national security. Earlier that year, a National Intelligence Council (NIC) estimate projected that the disease would reduce human life expectancy in Sub-Saharan Africa by as much as 30 years, and kill as much
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges and Innovations in a Community-Based Participatory
    HEBXXX10.1177/1090198116639243Health Education & BehaviorGoodkind et al. 639243research-article2016 Original Article Health Education & Behavior 2017, Vol. 44(1) 123 –130 Challenges and Innovations in a © 2016 Society for Public Health Education Reprints and permissions: Community-Based Participatory sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/1090198116639243 Randomized Controlled Trial journals.sagepub.com/home/heb Jessica R. Goodkind, PhD1, Suha Amer, MA1, Charlisa Christian, MBA1, Julia Meredith Hess, PhD1, Deborah Bybee, PhD2, Brian L. Isakson, PhD1, Brandon Baca, BS1, Martin Ndayisenga, ASW1, R. Neil Greene, MA1, and Cece Shantzek, BA1 Abstract Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are a long-standing and important design for conducting rigorous tests of the effectiveness of health interventions. However, many questions have been raised about the external validity of RCTs, their utility in explicating mechanisms of intervention and participants’ intervention experiences, and their feasibility and acceptability. In the current mixed-methods study, academic and community partners developed and implemented an RCT to test the effectiveness of a collaboratively developed community-based advocacy, learning, and social support intervention. The goals of the intervention were to address social determinants of health and build trust and connections with other mental health services in order to reduce mental health disparities among Afghan, Great Lakes Region African, and Iraqi refugee adults and to engage and retain refugees in trauma-focused
    [Show full text]
  • Consumerism in the 1920S: Collected Commentary
    BECOMING MODERN: AMERICA IN THE 1920S PRIMARY SOURCE COLLECTION ONTEMPORAR Y HE WENTIES IN OMMENTARY T T C * Leonard Dove, The New Yorker, October 26, 1929 — CONSUMERISM — Mass-produced consumer goods like automobiles and ready-to-wear clothes were not new to the 1920s, nor were advertising or mail- order catalogues. But something was new about Americans’ relationship with manufactured products, and it was accelerating faster than it could be defined. Not only did the latest goods become necessities, consumption itself became a necessity, it seemed to observers. Was that good for America? Yes, said some—people can live in unprecedented comfort and material security. Not so fast, said others—can we predict where consumerism is taking us before we’re inextricably there? Something new has come to confront American democracy. Samuel Strauss The Fathers of the Nation did not foresee it. History had opened “Things Are in the Saddle” to their foresight most of the obstacles which might be expected The Atlantic Monthly to get in the way of the Republic—political corruption, extreme November 1924 wealth, foreign domination, faction, class rule; . That which has stolen across the path of American democracy and is already altering Americanism was not in their calculations. History gave them no hint of it. What is happening today is without precedent, at least so far as historical research has discovered. No reformer, no utopian, no physiocrat, no poet, no writer of fantastic romances saw in his dreams the particular development which is with us here and now. This is our proudest boast: “The American citizen has more comforts and conveniences than kings had two hundred years ago.” It is a fact, and this fact is the outward evidence of the new force which has crossed the path of American democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • 15 Practices to Improve Vaccination Program Effectiveness by Reaching the People Most at Risk
    15 Practices to Improve Vaccination Program Effectiveness by Reaching the People Most at Risk Introduction The percent of the U.S. population vaccinated for COVID-19 has increased steadily over the past few weeks alongside of expansion of eligibility. As of June 2, 2021, nearly 63% of U.S. adults 18 years of age and older have received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccine, nearly 52% are fully vaccinated and everyone 12 years of age and older is now eligible for the vaccine. But this does not tell us the whole story. There are large disparities in vaccine uptake; racial and ethnic minorities, particularly the Black and Latinx communities, are being vaccinated at much lower rates than their white counterparts. These population groups also experience a higher burden of disease and higher COVID-19 hospitalization and death rates than whites. Vaccine uptake rates are also lower among rural populations and people About Us Vital Strategies is a global public with certain political perspectives. Vaccine equity needs to be prioritized in all health organization working in counties throughout the United States, not only as a matter of justice and to save 70+ countries to strengthen public health systems. Resolve lives, but also to reduce the risk of having more dangerous variants emerge. to Save Lives, an initiative of Vital Strategies, aims to prevent at least 100 million deaths from cardiovascular disease and epidemics. Through its Prevent Epidemics program, Resolve to Save Lives has rapidly leveraged existing networks to establish a multi-disciplinary, multi-pronged effort to support countries throughout Africa and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • Prosperity Economics Building an Economy for All
    ProsPerity economics Building an economy for All Jacob S. Hacker and Nate Loewentheil ProsPerity economics Building an economy for All Jacob S. Hacker and Nate Loewentheil Creative Commons (cc) 2012 by Jacob S. Hacker and Nate Loewentheil Notice of rights: This book has been published under a Creative Commons license (Attribution-NonCom- mercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported; to view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-sa/3.0/). This work may be copied, redistributed, or displayed by anyone, provided that proper at- tribution is given. ii / prosperity economics About the authors Jacob S. Hacker, Ph.D., is the Director of the Institution for Social and Policy Studies (ISPS), the Stanley B. Resor Professor of Political Science, and Senior Research Fellow in International and Area Studies at the MacMil- lan Center at Yale University. An expert on the politics of U.S. health and social policy, he is author of Winner-Take-All Politics: How Wash- ington Made the Rich Richer—And Turned Its Back on the Middle Class, with Paul Pierson (September 2010, paperback March 2011); The Great Risk Shift: The New Economic Insecurity and the Decline of the American Dream (2006, paperback 2008); The Divided Welfare State: The Battle Over Public and Private Social Benefits in the United States (2002); and The Road to Nowhere: The Genesis of President Clinton’s Plan for Health Security (1997), co-winner of the Brownlow Book Award of the National Academy of Public Administration. He is also co-author, with Paul Pierson, of Off Center: The Republican Revolution and the Erosion of American Democracy (2005), and has edited three volumes, most recently, Shared Responsibility, Shared Risk: Government, Markets and Social Policy in the Twenty-First Century, with Ann O'Leary (2012).
    [Show full text]