DOCSLIB.ORG

Benthic Communities at Horns Rev Before, During and After Con- Struction of Horns Rev Offshore Wind Farm

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Benthic Communities at Horns Rev Before, During and After Con- Struction of Horns Rev Offshore Wind Farm Benthic Communities at Horns Rev Before, During and After Con- struction of Horns Rev Offshore Wind Farm Final Report Annual Report 2005 Published: 31. May 2006 Prepared: Simon B. Leonhard Editing: Gitte Spanggaard John Pedersen Checked: Bjarne Moeslund Artwork: Kirsten Nygaard Approved: Simon B. Leonhard Cover photos: Jens Christensen Simon B. Leonhard Photos: Jens Christensen Maks Klaustrup Christian B. Hvidt Simon B. Leonhard English review: Matthew Cochran © No part of this publication may be reproduced by any means without clear reference to the source. Horns Rev. Benthic communities Page 3 Table of contents Page 1. Introduction.................................................................................................................16 1.1. Background .........................................................................................................16 1.2. Horns Rev...........................................................................................................17 1.2.1. Geology and geomorphology......................................................................18 1.2.2. Hydrography ...............................................................................................19 1.3. Horns Rev Offshore Wind Farm.........................................................................20 1.3.1. Construction and layout ..............................................................................20 1.3.2. Designated areas..........................................................................................22 1.4. Benthic communities at Horns Rev ....................................................................23 1.4.1. Benthic vegetation.......................................................................................23 1.4.2. Benthic fauna ..............................................................................................23 1.4.3. Population ecology and distribution at Horns Rev .....................................23 1.5. Scope of investigations .......................................................................................26 1.5.1. Possible and expected effects on benthic communities ..............................26 1.5.2. Criterion ......................................................................................................29 1.5.3. Hypotheses regarding effects ......................................................................30 2. Methods.......................................................................................................................31 2.1. Infauna.................................................................................................................31 2.1.1. Field surveys ...............................................................................................32 2.2. Hard bottom substrate .........................................................................................32 2.2.1. Field surveys ...............................................................................................33 2.3. Sample handling..................................................................................................35 2.3.1. Sediment......................................................................................................35 2.3.2. Benthos........................................................................................................35 2.4. Test fishing..........................................................................................................35 2.4.1. Objective .....................................................................................................36 2.5. Data analyses.......................................................................................................36 2.5.1. Sediment characteristics..............................................................................37 2.5.2. Species composition....................................................................................37 3. Results.........................................................................................................................40 3.1. Sediment..............................................................................................................40 3.2. Infauna.................................................................................................................42 3.2.1. Structure of the community.........................................................................47 3.3. Hard bottom substrate .........................................................................................50 3.3.1. Vegetation ...................................................................................................50 3.3.2. Epifauna ......................................................................................................52 3.3.3. Fish..............................................................................................................69 4. Discussion ...................................................................................................................71 4.1. Natural patterns in distribution and abundance...................................................71 4.2. Effects from the wind farm .................................................................................71 4.2.1. Construction ................................................................................................71 4.2.2. Operation.....................................................................................................80 4.2.3. Cumulative effects......................................................................................80 4.3. Methodological considerations for future studies (lessons learned)...................80 5. Conclusion ..................................................................................................................81 Doc. No. 2572-03-005 rev. 4 Horns Rev. Benthic communities Page 4 6. Acknowledgements.....................................................................................................83 7. References...................................................................................................................84 8. Appendixes..................................................................................................................90 8.1. Appendix 1. Coordinates of the wind farm and list of Positions ........................90 8.2. Appendix 2. Species Lists...................................................................................92 8.2.1. Appendix 2.1. Infauna 1999-2005 ..............................................................93 8.2.2. Appendix2.2. Algae ....................................................................................94 8.2.3. Appendix 2.3. Fish ......................................................................................94 8.2.4. Appendix 2.4. Hard bottom substrate. Benthos ..........................................95 8.3. Appendix 3. Infauna............................................................................................98 8.3.1. Appendix 3.1. Infauna mean abundance 1999-2004...................................98 8.3.2. Appendix 3.2. Infauna mean abundance 1999-2005 (spring).....................99 8.3.3. Appendix 3.3. Infauna mean biomass WW. 1999-2004 ...........................100 8.3.4. Appendix 3.4. Infauna mean biomass WW 1999-2005 (Spring)..............101 8.3.5. Appendix 3.4. Infauna mean biomass DW 1999-2005 (Spring)...............102 8.4. Appendix 4. Hard bottom substrate ..................................................................103 8.4.1. Appendix 4.1. Relative coverage. Monopiles ...........................................103 8.4.2. Appendix 4.3. Mean abundance. Monopiles 2003-2005 ..........................107 8.4.3. Appendix 4.4. Mean abundance. Scour protections 2003-2005 ...............113 8.4.4. Appendix 4.5. Mean biomass WW. Monopiles 2003-2005......................116 8.4.5. Appendix 4.6. Mean biomass WW. Scour protections 2003-2005...........122 8.4.6. Appendix 4.7. Mean biomass DW. Monopiles 2003-2005.......................125 8.4.7. Appendix 4.8. mean biomass DW. Scour protections 2003-2005 ............131 Doc. No. 2572-03-005 rev. 4 Horns Rev. Benthic communities Page 5 Summary In 1997, the Horns Rev area was designated as one of five areas suitable for future off- shore wind farm development pursuant to the Danish Action Plan for Offshore Wind Farms. In 2002, the Horns Rev Offshore Wind Farm was established with a production capacity of 160 MW. As part of the demonstration project, a monitoring programme was initiated to investigate the effects on the environment before, during and after the completion of the wind farm. The objective of the programme was to ensure that offshore wind power does not have damaging effects on natural ecosystems and to provide a solid basis for decisions for fur- ther offshore wind power development. The present study describes the effects on the ben- thic fauna and flora communities in the area designated for and later developed into the Horns Rev Offshore Wind Farm. Horns Rev – the site of location Horns Rev is an extension of Blåvands Huk, which extends more than 40 km to the west into the North Sea. The width of the reef varies between 1 km and 5 km and forms the northern extremity of the European Wadden Sea. Horns Rev was formed by sediment de- posited during earlier geological periods. Today these deposits are covered by huge ac- cumulations of marine sand and are subject
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 Genetic Diversity in Two Introduced Biofouling Amphipods
    1 Genetic diversity in two introduced biofouling amphipods (Ampithoe valida & Jassa 2 marmorata) along the Pacific North American coast: investigation into molecular 3 identification and cryptic diversity 4 5 Erik M. Pilgrim and John A. Darling 6 US Environmental Protection Agency 7 Ecological Exposure Research Division 8 26 W. Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45268, USA. 9 10 Running Title: Genetic diversity of introduced Ampithoe and Jassa 11 12 Article Type: Biodiversity Research 13 14 ABSTRACT 15 Aim We investigated patterns of genetic diversity among invasive populations of A. valida and J. 16 marmorata from the Pacific North American coast to assess the accuracy of morphological 17 identification and determine whether or not cryptic diversity and multiple introductions 18 contribute to the contemporary distribution of these species in the region. 19 Location Native range: Atlantic North American coast; Invaded range: Pacific North American 20 coast. 21 Methods We assessed indices of genetic diversity based on DNA sequence data from the 22 mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene, determined the distribution of COI 23 haplotypes among populations in both the invasive and putative native ranges of A. valida and J. 24 marmorata, and reconstructed phylogenetic relationships among COI haplotypes using both 25 maximum parsimony and Bayesian approaches. 26 Results Phylogenetic inference indicates that inaccurate species level identifications by 27 morphological criteria are common among Jassa specimens. In addition, our data reveal the 28 presence of three well supported but previously unrecognized clades of A. valida among 29 specimens in the northeastern Pacific. Different species of Jassa and different genetic lineages of 1 30 Ampithoe exhibit striking disparity in geographic distribution across the region as well as 31 substantial differences in genetic diversity indices.
    [Show full text]
  • Kommunenavn: Svendborg Kommuners Indberetning På
    Kommunenavn: Svendborg Kommuners indberetning på godsområdet til beregning af økonomisk kompensationsbehov som følge af COVID-19 Billetindtægter er ekskl. ordinært § 21 a tilskud, vareafgift til havnene samt moms Beregning af mindreindtægter Billetindtægter i Billetindtægter i perioden marts- perioden marts- september i 2019 (i september i 2020 (i Kommune Rute 1.000 kr.) 1.000 kr.) Assens Baagø-Assens Fanø Fanø-Esbjerg Faaborg-Midtfyn Bjørnø-Faaborg Faaborg-Midtfyn Lyø-Avernakø-Faaborg Haderslev Aarø-Aarøsund Hedensted Hjarnø-Snaptun Holbæk Orø-Holbæk Holbæk Orø- Hammer bakker Horsens Endelave-Snaptun Kalundborg Havnsø-Sejerø Kalundborg Havnsø-Nekselø Langeland Strynø-Rudkøbing Lolland Fejø-Kragenæs Lolland Femø-Kragenæs Lolland Askø-Bandholm Læsø Læsø-Frederikshavn Norddjurs Anholt-Grenaa Odder Tunø-Hou Samsø Hou-Samsø Skive Fur-Branden Slagelse Agersø-Stigsnæs Slagelse Omø-Stigsnæs Struer Venø-Kleppen Svendborg Hjortø-Svendborg 1 3 Svendborg Skarø-drejø-Svendborg 139 111 Ærø Birkholm-Marstal Ærø Ærøskøbing-Svendborg Ærø Søby-Faaborg Ærø Søby-Fynshav Ærø Marstal-Rudkøbing Aabenraa Barsø-Barsø-Landing Aalborg Egholm-Aalborg Kommuners indberetning på godsområdet til beregning af økonomisk kompensationsbehov som følge af COVID-19 Beregning af mindreindtægter Samlede mindreindtægte r i 2020 (i 1.000 kr.) 2 -28 Kommunenavn: Svendborg Kommuners indberetning på passagerområdet til beregning af økonomisk kompensationsbehov som følge af COVID-19 Billetindtægt er ekskl. ordinært § 21 b tilskud og moms Beregning af mindreindtægter Billetindtægter
    [Show full text]
  • Additions to and Revisions of the Amphipod (Crustacea: Amphipoda) Fauna of South Africa, with a List of Currently Known Species from the Region
    Additions to and revisions of the amphipod (Crustacea: Amphipoda) fauna of South Africa, with a list of currently known species from the region Rebecca Milne Department of Biological Sciences & Marine Research Institute, University of CapeTown, Rondebosch, 7700 South Africa & Charles L. Griffiths* Department of Biological Sciences & Marine Research Institute, University of CapeTown, Rondebosch, 7700 South Africa E-mail: [email protected] (with 13 figures) Received 25 June 2013. Accepted 23 August 2013 Three species of marine Amphipoda, Peramphithoe africana, Varohios serratus and Ceradocus isimangaliso, are described as new to science and an additional 13 species are recorded from South Africa for the first time. Twelve of these new records originate from collecting expeditions to Sodwana Bay in northern KwaZulu-Natal, while one is an introduced species newly recorded from Simon’s Town Harbour. In addition, we collate all additions and revisions to the regional amphipod fauna that have taken place since the last major monographs of each group and produce a comprehensive, updated faunal list for the region. A total of 483 amphipod species are currently recognized from continental South Africa and its Exclusive Economic Zone . Of these, 35 are restricted to freshwater habitats, seven are terrestrial forms, and the remainder either marine or estuarine. The fauna includes 117 members of the suborder Corophiidea, 260 of the suborder Gammaridea, 105 of the suborder Hyperiidea and a single described representative of the suborder Ingolfiellidea.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ecology of Infrastructure Decommissioning in the North Sea: What We Need to Know and How to Achieve It
    Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/icesjms/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/icesjms/fsz143/5543459 by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory user on 13 September 2019 ICES Journal of Marine Science (2019), doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsz143 Contribution to the Themed Section: ‘Decommissioned offshore man-made installations’ Quo Vadimus The ecology of infrastructure decommissioning in the North Sea: what we need to know and how to achieve it A. M. Fowler 1,2*, A.-M. Jørgensen3, J. W. P. Coolen 4,5, D. O. B. Jones6, J. C. Svendsen7, R. Brabant 8, B. Rumes8, and S. Degraer8 1Fish Ecology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, University of Technology Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia 2School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC 3125, Australia 3Eco-Effective Strategies, Galileiplantsoen 14, 1098 NA Amsterdam, The Netherlands 4Wageningen Marine Research (Formerly IMARES), PO Box 57, 1780 AB Den Helder, The Netherlands 5Aquatic Ecology and Water Quality Management Group, Wageningen University, Droevendaalsesteeg 3a, 6708 PD Wageningen, The Netherlands 6National Oceanography Centre, European Way, Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK 7National Institute of Aquatic Resources (DTU Aqua), Technical University of Denmark, Building 201, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark 8Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences (RBINS), Operational Directorate Natural Environment (ODNature), Marine Ecology and Management (MARECO), Vautierstraat 29, 1000 Brussels, Belgium *Corresponding author: tel: þ61 9 435 4652; e-mail: [email protected]. Fowler, A. M., Jørgensen, A.-M., Coolen, J. W. P., Jones, D. O. B., Svendsen, J. C., Brabant, R., Rumes, B., and Degraer, S. The ecology of infrastructure decommissioning in the North Sea: what we need to know and how to achieve it.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Checklist of Marine Fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the Proposed Extension of the Portuguese Continental Shelf
    European Journal of Taxonomy 73: 1-73 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2014.73 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2014 · Carneiro M. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A5F217D-8E7B-448A-9CAB-2CCC9CC6F857 Updated checklist of marine fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf Miguel CARNEIRO1,5, Rogélia MARTINS2,6, Monica LANDI*,3,7 & Filipe O. COSTA4,8 1,2 DIV-RP (Modelling and Management Fishery Resources Division), Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, Av. Brasilia 1449-006 Lisboa, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3,4 CBMA (Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology), Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] * corresponding author: [email protected] 5 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:90A98A50-327E-4648-9DCE-75709C7A2472 6 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:1EB6DE00-9E91-407C-B7C4-34F31F29FD88 7 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:6D3AC760-77F2-4CFA-B5C7-665CB07F4CEB 8 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:48E53CF3-71C8-403C-BECD-10B20B3C15B4 Abstract. The study of the Portuguese marine ichthyofauna has a long historical tradition, rooted back in the 18th Century. Here we present an annotated checklist of the marine fishes from Portuguese waters, including the area encompassed by the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf and the Economic Exclusive Zone (EEZ). The list is based on historical literature records and taxon occurrence data obtained from natural history collections, together with new revisions and occurrences.
    [Show full text]
  • Hard Bottom Substrate Monitoring Horns Rev Offshore Wind Farm
    Engineering Hard Bottom Substrate Monitoring Horns Rev Offshore Wind Farm Annual Status Report 2004 v 'TW- ELsam Engineering Hard Bottom Substrate Monitoring Horns Rev Offshore Wind Farm Annual Status Report 2004 Published: 2. May 2005 Prepared: Simon B. Leonhard Editing: Gitte Spanggaard John Pedersen Checked: Bjame Moeslund Artwork: Kirsten Nygaard Approved: Simon B. Leonhard Cover photos: Jens Christensen Simon B. Leonhard Photos: Jens Christensen Maks Klaustmp Simon B. Leonhard English review: Matthew Cochran © No part of this publication may be reproduced by any means without clear reference to the source. Homs Rev. Hard Bottom Substrate Monitoring Page 3 Annual Status Report 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Summary.................................................................................................................................... 4 Sammenfatning (in Danish) ....................................................................................................... 7 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 10 2. Methodology....................................................................................................................... 11 2.1. The research area...........................................................................................................11 2.2. Field activities................................................................................................................13 2.3. Test fishing..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Amphipod Newsletter 39 (2015)
    AMPHIPOD NEWSLETTER 39 2015 Interviews BIBLIOGRAPHY THIS NEWSLETTER PAGE 19 FEATURES INTERVIEWS WITH ALICJA KONOPACKA AND KRZYSZTOF JAŻDŻEWSKI PAGE 2 MICHEL LEDOYER WORLD AMPHIPODA IN MEMORIAM DATABASE PAGE 14 PAGE 17 AMPHIPOD NEWSLETTER 39 Dear Amphipodologists, Statistics from We are delighted to present to you Amphipod Newsletter 39! this Newsletter This issue includes interviews with two members of our amphipod family – Alicja Konopacka and Krzysztof Jazdzewski. Both tell an amazing story of their lives and work 2 new subfamilies as amphipodologists. Sadly we lost a member of our amphipod 21 new genera family – Michel Ledoyer. Denise Bellan-Santini provides us with a fitting memorial to his life and career. Shortly many 145 new species members of the amphipod family will gather for the 16th ICA in 5 new subspecies Aveiro, Portugal. And plans are well underway for the 17th ICA in Turkey (see page 64 for more information). And, as always, we provide you with a Bibliography and index of amphipod publications that includes citations of 376 papers that were published in 2013-2015 (or after the publication of Amphipod Newsletter 38). Again, what an amazing amount of research that has been done by you! Please continue to notify us when your papers are published. We hope you enjoy your Amphipod Newsletter! Best wishes from your AN Editors, Wim, Adam, Miranda and Anne Helene !1 AMPHIPOD NEWSLETTER 39 2015 Interview with two prominent members of the “Polish group”. The group of amphipod workers in Poland has always been a visible and valued part of the amphipod society. They have organised two of the Amphipod Colloquia and have steadily provided important results in the world of amphipod science.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Science Advance Access Published November 21, 2014 ICES Journal of Marine Science
    ICES Journal of Marine Science Advance Access published November 21, 2014 ICES Journal of Marine Science ICES Journal of Marine Science; doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsu211 Distribution and habitat preferences of five species of wrasse (Family Labridae) in a Norwegian fjord Downloaded from Anne Berit Skiftesvik*, Caroline M. F. Durif, Reidun M. Bjelland, and Howard I. Browman Institute of Marine Research, Austevoll, 5392 Storebø, Norway *Corresponding author: tel: +47 918 66 526; e-mail: [email protected] Skiftesvik, A. B., Durif, C. M. F., Bjelland, R. M., and Browman, H. I. Distribution and habitat preferences of five species of wrasse http://icesjms.oxfordjournals.org/ (Family Labridae) in a Norwegian fjord. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fsu211. Received 14 July 2014; revised 30 October 2014; accepted 30 October 2014. Wrasse (Labridae) are used widely as cleaner fish to control sea lice infestation in commercial farming of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in Norway. As a result, there is an intense fishery for wrasse along the Norwegian coast. Little is known of the popu- lation ecology of wrasse and, therefore, an evaluation of their distribution, demographics, and habitat preferences was required as a baseline from which to assess the impact of the fishery. We analysed experimental catch data from a 3-year survey carried out in 1997–1999 (before the fishery began) during and after the wrasse spawning season in a Norwegian fjord. Corkwing wrasse (Symphodus melops) was always the most abundant species, ranging from 52 to 68% of the catches. Goldsinny (Ctenolabrus rupestris) and rock cook (Centrolabrus exoletus) were the second most abun- by Howard Browman on November 22, 2014 dant species (up to 30%).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Amphipoda of the Northeast Pacific (Equator to Aleutians, Intertidal to Abyss): IX. Photoidea
    Amphipoda of the Northeast Pacific (Equator to Aleutians, intertidal to abyss): IX. Photoidea - a review Donald B. Cadien, LACSD 22 July 2004 (revised 21 May 2015) Preface The purpose of this review is to bring together information on all of the species reported to occur in the NEP fauna. It is not a straight path to the identification of your unknown animal. It is a resource guide to assist you in making the required identification in full knowledge of what the possibilities are. Never forget that there are other, as yet unreported species from the coverage area; some described, some new to science. The natural world is wonderfully diverse, and we have just scratched its surface. Introduction to the Photoidea Over more than a century the position of the photids has been in dispute. Their separation was recommended by Boeck (1871), a position maintained by Stebbing (1906). Others have relegated the photids to the synonymy of the isaeids, and taxa considered here as photids have been listed as members of the Family Isaeidae in most west coast literature (i.e. J. L. Barnard 1969a, Conlan 1983). J. L. Barnard further combined both families, along with the Aoridae, into an expanded Corophiidae. The cladistic examination of the corophioid amphipods by Myers and Lowry (2003) offered support to the separation of the photids from the isaeids, although the composition of the photids was not the same as viewed by Stebbing or other earlier authors. The cladistic analysis indicated the Isaeidae were a very small clade separated at superfamily level from the photids, the neomegamphopids, and the caprellids within the infraorder Caprellida.
    [Show full text]
  • GEN 2.4 Location Indicators / Stedindikatorer
    VFR Flight Guide GEN 2.4 - 1 Denmark 25 MAR 21 GEN 2.4 Location Indicators / Stedindikatorer Note: Location indicators identified by an * cannot be addressed over the AFS/ Stedindikatorer identificeret med en * kan ikke adresseres over AFS 1. Encode / Omsætning til kode 2. Decode / Dechifrering Location / Indicator / Indicator / Location / Sted Indikator Indikator Sted A6A (Private helideck) EKAF * EKAB * ARNBORG (Private AD) AALBORG (CIV/MIL) EKYT EKAC* AARHUS VANDFLYVEPLADS AALBORG HEMS (Private heliport) EKAL* (Water AD) AARHUS EKAH EKAE ÆRØ AARHUS(JRCC) EKMC EKAF * A6A (Private helideck) AARHUS VANDFLYVEPLADS EKAC* EKAH AARHUS (Water AD) EKAL* AALBORG HEMS (Private heliport) AARHUS HEARTCENTER HEMS EKSH * EKAN * SYD ARNE NORD (Private helideck) (Private heliport) EKAO * ÆRØ HELIPORT (Private helideck) AARHUS TRAUMACENTER HEMS EKTR * EKAR * SYD ARNE (Private helideck) (Private heliport) EKAS * TRUE SVÆVEFLYVEBANE ANHOLT EKAT * (Private AD) ANHOLT VINDMØLLEPARK (Private EKAV * EKAT * ANHOLT helideck) EKAV * ANHOLT VINDMØLLEPARK (Private ANNISSE (Private AD) EKHE * helideck) ARNBORG (Private AD) EKAB * EKBH * BOLHEDE FLYVEPLADS (Private AD) BILLUND EKBI EKBI BILLUND BOLHEDE FLYVEPLADS (Private AD) EKBH * EKBR * BRÆDSTRUP (Private AD) BORNHOLM HEMS (Private heliport) EKRB * EKBU * BUTENDIEK (Private helideck) BORNHOLM/RØNNE EKRN EKCA * TRAFIKSTYRELSEN / DANISH BRÆDSTRUP (Private AD) EKBR * TRANSPORT AUTHORITY BUTENDIEK (Private helideck) EKBU * EKCB * ÅRSLEV (Private heliport) CECILIE (Private helideck) EKCE * EKCC* KØBENHAVN VANDFLYVEPLADS
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Marine Fishes from Metropolitan France
    Checklist of the marine fishes from metropolitan France by Philippe BÉAREZ* (1, 8), Patrice PRUVOST (2), Éric FEUNTEUN (2, 3, 8), Samuel IGLÉSIAS (2, 4, 8), Patrice FRANCOUR (5), Romain CAUSSE (2, 8), Jeanne DE MAZIERES (6), Sandrine TERCERIE (6) & Nicolas BAILLY (7, 8) Abstract. – A list of the marine fish species occurring in the French EEZ was assembled from more than 200 references. No updated list has been published since the 19th century, although incomplete versions were avail- able in several biodiversity information systems. The list contains 729 species distributed in 185 families. It is a preliminary step for the Atlas of Marine Fishes of France that will be further elaborated within the INPN (the National Inventory of the Natural Heritage: https://inpn.mnhn.fr). Résumé. – Liste des poissons marins de France métropolitaine. Une liste des poissons marins se trouvant dans la Zone Économique Exclusive de France a été constituée à partir de plus de 200 références. Cette liste n’avait pas été mise à jour formellement depuis la fin du 19e siècle, © SFI bien que des versions incomplètes existent dans plusieurs systèmes d’information sur la biodiversité. La liste Received: 4 Jul. 2017 Accepted: 21 Nov. 2017 contient 729 espèces réparties dans 185 familles. C’est une étape préliminaire pour l’Atlas des Poissons marins Editor: G. Duhamel de France qui sera élaboré dans le cadre de l’INPN (Inventaire National du Patrimoine Naturel : https://inpn. mnhn.fr). Key words Marine fishes No recent faunistic work cov- (e.g. Quéro et al., 2003; Louisy, 2015), in which the entire Northeast Atlantic ers the fish species present only in Europe is considered (Atlantic only for the former).
    [Show full text]
  • Registrering Af Fangster Med Standardredskaber I De Danske Kystområder Nøglefiskerrapport for 2017-2019 Josianne G
    DTU Aqua Institut for Akvatiske Ressourcer Registrering af fangster med standardredskaber i de danske kystområder Nøglefiskerrapport for 2017-2019 Josianne G. Støttrup, Alexandros Kokkalis, Mads Christoffersen, Eva Maria Pedersen, Michael Ingemann Pedersen og Jeppe Olsen DTU Aqua-rapport nr. 375-2020 Registrering af fangster med standardredskaber i de danske kystområder Nøglefiskerrapport for 2017-2019 Af Josianne G. Støttrup, Alexandros Kokkalis, Mads Christoffersen, Eva Maria Pedersen, Michael Ingemann Pedersen og Jeppe Olsen DTU Aqua-rapport nr. 375-2020 Kolofon Titel: Registrering af fangster med standardredskaber i de danske kystområder. Nøglefiskerrapport for 2017-2019 Forfattere: Josianne G. Støttrup, Alexandros Kokkalis, Mads Christoffersen, Eva Maria Pe- dersen, Michael Ingemann Pedersen og Jeppe Olsen DTU Aqua-rapport nr.: 375-2020 År: November 2020 Reference: Støttrup JG, Kokkalis A, Christoffersen M, Pedersen EM, Pedersen MI og Olsen J (2020). Registrering af fangster med standardredskaber i de danske kystområ- der. Nøglefiskerrapport for 2017-2019. DTU Aqua-rapport nr. 375-2020. Institut for Akvatiske Ressourcer, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet. 153 pp. + bilag Forsidefoto: Pighvar klar til udsætning. Foto: Mads Christoffersen. Udgivet af: Institut for Akvatiske Ressourcer (DTU Aqua), Danmarks Tekniske Universitet, Kemitorvet, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby Download: www.aqua.dtu.dk/publikationer ISSN: 1395-8216 ISBN: Trykt udgave: 978-87-7481-298-2 Elektronisk udgave: 978-87-7481-299-9 DTU Aqua-rapporter er afrapportering fra forskningsprojekter,
    [Show full text]