Germany 2002 Review INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Germany 2002 Review INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY Energy Policies of IEA Countries Germany 2002 Review INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY Energy Policies of IEA Countries Germany 2002 Review INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY ORGANISATION FOR 9, rue de la Fédération, ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION 75739 Paris, cedex 15, France AND DEVELOPMENT The International Energy Agency (IEA) is an Pursuant to Article 1 of the Convention signed in autonomous body which was established in Paris on 14th December 1960, and which came November 1974 within the framework of the into force on 30th September 1961, the Organisation Organisation for Economic Co-operation and for Economic Co-operation and Development Development (OECD) to implement an inter- (OECD) shall promote policies designed: national energy programme. • to achieve the highest sustainable economic It carries out a comprehensive programme of growth and employment and a rising standard energy co-operation among twenty-six* of the of living in Member countries, while maintaining OECD’s thirty Member countries. The basic aims financial stability, and thus to contribute to the of the IEA are: development of the world economy; • to maintain and improve systems for coping • to contribute to sound economic expansion in with oil supply disruptions; Member as well as non-member countries in the process of economic development; and • to promote rational energy policies in a global context through co-operative relations with non- • to contribute to the expansion of world trade member countries, industry and international on a multilateral, non-discriminatory basis in organisations; accordance with international obligations. • to operate a permanent information system on The original Member countries of the OECD are the international oil market; Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, • to improve the world’s energy supply and Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, demand structure by developing alternative Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United energy sources and increasing the efficiency of Kingdom and the United States. The following energy use; countries became Members subsequently • to assist in the integration of environmental and through accession at the dates indicated energy policies. hereafter: Japan (28th April 1964), Finland (28th January 1969), Australia (7th June 1971), * IEA Member countries: Australia, Austria, New Zealand (29th May 1973), Mexico (18th Belgium, Canada, the Czech Republic, Denmark, May 1994), the Czech Republic (21st December Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, 1995), Hungary (7th May 1996), Poland (22nd Italy, Japan, the Republic of Korea, Luxembourg, November 1996), the Republic of Korea (12th the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, December 1996) and Slovakia (28th September Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United 2000). The Commission of the European Kingdom, the United States. The European Communities takes part in the work of the OECD Commission also takes part in the work of the IEA. (Article 13 of the OECD Convention). © OECD/IEA, 2002 Applications for permission to reproduce or translate all or part of this publication should be made to: Head of Publications Service, OECD/IEA 2, rue André-Pascal, 75775 Paris cedex 16, France or 9, rue de la Fédération, 75739 Paris Cedex 15, France. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...... 7 2 ORGANISATION OF THE REVIEW .............................. 15 3 ENERGY MARKET AND ENERGY POLICY ........................ 17 4 ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT ............................. 35 5 ENERGY DEMAND AND END-USE EFFICIENCY .................. 45 6 OIL ........................................................... 53 7 COAL ......................................................... 63 8 NATURAL GAS ................................................ 73 9 RENEWABLES ................................................. 91 10 ELECTRICITY AND HEAT ........................................ 99 11 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ................................ 125 A ANNEX: ENERGY BALANCES AND KEY STATISTICAL DATA ......... 133 B ANNEX: INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY “SHARED GOALS” . 137 C ANNEX: GLOSSARY AND LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ............... 139 3 List of Tables 1. Energy Taxes in Germany, 2000 ................................... 30 2. The Eco-tax, 1999 and 2003 ...................................... 30 3. Sectoral Contributions to CO2 Reduction in the National Climate Protection Programme .............................................................. 40 4. Power Stations Using Clean Coal Technologies ...................... 41 5. Energy Efficiency Indicators ....................................... 47 6. EU Fuel Standards for Sulphur and the Estimated Impact of the Eco-tax on the Sulphur Contents of Fuels in Germany ....................... 59 7. Total Coal Supply ................................................ 63 8. Financial Aid for the German Coal Industry, 1997 to 2005 .......... 69 9. Major Pipelines .................................................. 78 10. Import and Export of Electricity, 1990 to 2000 ...................... 103 11. Electricity Network Access in IEA Countries ......................... 108 12. Unbundling of Transmission System Operators in IEA Countries . 110 13. German Nuclear Power Generation, 2000 to 2001 ................. 111 14. Net Remaining Generation for Individual Reactors as of 1 January 2000 . 113 15. Federal Government Energy R&D Budget ........................... 127 List of Figures 1. Map of Germany ................................................ 18 2. Total Primary Energy Supply, 1973 to 2010 ........................ 19 3. Total Primary Energy Supply in IEA Countries, 2000 ................. 20 4. Total Final Consumption by Sector, 1973 to 2010 ................... 21 5. Total Final Consumption by Source, 1973 to 2010 .................. 21 6. Energy Production by Source, 1973 to 2010 ........................ 26 7. Origin of Gross Energy Imports in Germany, 2000 .................. 28 8. CO2 Emissions by Fuel, 1973 to 2000 ............................. 36 9. CO2 Emissions by Sector, 1973 to 2000 ............................ 36 10. Energy-related CO2 Emissions per GDP in Germany and in Other Selected IEA Countries, 1973 to 2010 ...................................... 37 11. Total Final Consumption by Sector and by Source, 1973 to 2010 ..... 46 12. Energy Intensity in Germany and in Other Selected IEA Countries, 1973 to 2010 ................................................... 47 13. Final Consumption of Oil by Sector, 1973 to 2010 .................. 54 14. Fuel Prices, 2000 ................................................. 55 15. OECD Unleaded Gasoline Prices and Taxes, Fourth Quarter 2001 .... 56 16. OECD Automotive Diesel Prices and Taxes, Fourth Quarter 2001 ..... 57 4 17. German Coal Mines .............................................. 64 18. Final Consumption of Coal by Sector, 1973 to 2010 ................. 65 19. Assisted Hard Coal Production in IEA Countries, 1991 to 2000 . 68 20. Aid per Tonne of Coal Equivalent, 1991 to 2000 .................... 68 21. Final Consumption of Natural Gas by Sector, 1973 to 2010 .......... 76 22. German Gas Market Structure ..................................... 78 23. Import and Export of Gas, 2000 ................................... 79 24. Natural Gas Infrastructure ......................................... 80 25. Gas Prices in IEA Countries, 2000 ................................. 84 26. Gas Prices in Germany and in Other Selected IEA Countries, 1980 to 2000 ................................................... 85 27. Final Consumption of Electricity by Sector, 1973 to 2010 ............ 102 28. Electricity Generation by Source, 1973 to 2010 ..................... 103 29. Import and Export of Electricity, 2000 .............................. 104 30. Electricity Prices in IEA Countries, 2000 ............................ 106 31. Electricity Prices in Germany and in Other Selected IEA Countries, 1980 to 2000 ................................................... 107 5 1 SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SUMMARY The German government has a challenging energy policy agenda. It has decided to phase out nuclear power and it has established ambitious targets to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. While it is not yet clear how nuclear power will be replaced, it is likely that energy efficiency and conservation, co-generation and renewables, as well as fossil fuels, will play a significant role in Germany’s energy supply. To ensure that these policies will be cost-effective, their development and effectiveness will need to be closely monitored. Energy security is an important issue for Germany as the country has limited indigenous energy resources. Moreover,the decision to gradually phase out nuclear power by 2025 will increase Germany’s reliance on imports of coal and natural gas, which currently represent 27% and 78% of demand for these fuels. Germany will also continue to depend heavily on imported oil, at about 40% of its total primary energy supply. To address these energy security issues, Germany is focusing on the development of domestic fuels and renewables, energy end-use efficiency, and on good relations with energy exporting countries. For a long time Germany has managed to significantly reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG) and air pollutants. These reductions have resulted partly from the so-called “fall-wall effect” 1 in the New Laender where industrial restructuring has taken place, but
Recommended publications
  • Hebammen Kreis Borken.Xlsx
    NAME VORNAME STRASSE PLZ ORT TELEFON E-Mail KRANKENHAUS/PRAXIS/FREI EINZUGSBEREICH LEISTUNGSSPEKTRUM Baumann Antje Up de Gehre 12 46395 Bocholt (0 28 71) 2 35 16 14 [email protected] Marien-Hospital Wesel/Frei Wochenbettbetreuung Bense Julia Layenstiege 10 48624 Schöppingen (0 25 55) 9 97 82 80 [email protected] Gronau/Frei Schöppingen und Umgebung Schwangerschaftsbetreuung, Geburtsvorbereitung, Wochenbettbetreuung, Rückbildungsgymnastik, Geburtshilfe in der Klinik, Akupunktur Berger Ursula Virchowstr. 17 48567 Steinfurt (0 25 52) 6 39 99 90 [email protected] Gronau/Frei Gronau und Umgebung Vorsorge, Hilfe bei Schwangerschaftsbeschwerden, Akupunktur, Wochenbettbetreuung, Babymassage Bergerbusch Christina Wibbeltstr. 25 46354 Südlohn (01 76) 81 45 02 61 [email protected] St. Marien-Krankenhaus Ahaus/Frei Südlohn und Umgebung Wochenbettbetreuung, Akupunktur, Tapeing Bernemann Kerstin Oedingkamp 16 46342 Velen (01 70) 2 73 58 92 [email protected] Bocholt/Praxis Bocholt und Umgebung Hebammenpraxis "von Anfang an" in Bocholt, Neustraße 2 - 4 Boras Jasna Weidekamp 5 48703 Stadtlohn (0 25 63) 69 19 [email protected] Maria-Hilf Stadtlohn/Frei Stadtlohn Rückbildungsgymnastik, Nachsorge Bücker Laura Truvenne 50 46348 Raesfeld (01 51) 65 64 69 44 [email protected] Frei Raesfeld und Umgebung Schwangerenvorsorge, CTG Überwachung, Hilfe bei Schwangerschaftsbeschwerden, Geburtsvorbereitungskurse, Nachsorge, Hilfe bei Still - und Ernährungsproblematiken, Kinesiotaping, Babymassage, Trageberatung, Hebammen an Schulen
    [Show full text]
  • Duke Energy Profile
    Duke Energy Duke Energy, based in North Carolina, is the largest electric utility in the United States and the company emits more carbon pollution than any other utility. Duke also ranks first in fossil fuel generation and second in coal-fired generation. The majority of Duke’s business is in regulated, monopoly utilities in six states: North Carolina, South Carolina, Florida, Indiana, Ohio and Kentucky. While Duke also owns a commercial arm that has invested in wind and solar power that it sells electricity to other utilities, Duke’s electricity customers in its regulated territory receive an electricity mix that contains next to zero renewable energy. The company has shown little appetite for change. In fact, regulatory documents show it intends to have only 4% renewable power in North Carolina by 2029. Duke’s fossil and nuclear-dominated strategy have led to a series of scandals in recent years both for its customers and the environment. Duke’s coal ash waste has become a systemic disaster in the Carolinas, culminating in the 2014 coal ash spill on the Dan River. Nuclear construction projects in the Carolinas and particularly Florida have been beset by problems, costing ratepayers billions of dollars. Duke has protected itself from stricter oversight in its regulated operations by contributing heavily to the state and federal politicians that control its destiny, pouring millions of dollars into campaign contributions and lobbying. Despite massive pressures facing the electric power sector to adapt to technological change that is ushering in a new wave of energy efficiency, rooftop solar power, and distributed energy storage, Duke has yet to show much of an appetite for change.
    [Show full text]
  • Duke Energy Sustainable Solutions
    DukeDuDu DuEnergykkeke eEnergy EnergyEnergy RDuenewablesDuke kR e RenewablesR enewablesEnergyenewables Energy Wind Renewables SustainableCommercial Regulated Third-PartyPower and U.S. Solar SolutionsSolar BatteryCustomer Portfolio Power Power Storage ProjectsProjects Projects Projects Including O&M sites Garden Michigan Fairbanks Pinnebog Echo McKinley Sigel Brookfield Pisgah Mountain Pine River Minden Isabella Gratiot Spruce Mountain Rosiere Wind Shirley Sterling Berkley EastFutureGen Campbell Hill Top of the World Ledyard Block Island Laurel HillBald Eagle Shoreham Bellefonte Silver Sage Happy Jack North Allegheny New Jersey Sunset Reservoir Sunset Reservoir San Jose Kit Carson Beckjord I San Carlos VictoryVictory Palmer PumpjackPumpjack North Carolina Taylorsville Dogwood Garysburg Murfreesboro Rio Bravo I & II Cimarron II North Carolina Halifax Long Farm Seaboard River Road Rio Bravo I & II Ironwood Taylorsville Dogwood Garysburg Murfreesboro Tarboro Gaston Woodland Winton Long Farm Seaboard Wildwood I & II Battleboro Halifax RiverSunbury Road Longboat Tarboro Gaston Woodland WintonShawboro Longboat Sunbury North Rosamond Frontier Battleboro Capital Partners Highlander Shawboro Highlander Bagdad Prescott Valley Martins Creek Hertford Frontier II Holiness Capital Partners Windsor Cooper Hill Bagdad MurphyMartins Farm Creek Hertford Seville I & II Black WingateHoliness WindsorCreswell Cooper Hill CA Hospitals Murphy Farm Everetts Wildcat Mountain Wingate Creswell EverettsWashington Wildcat White Post Shelby Washington Millfield Broad
    [Show full text]
  • Duke Energy Renewables Blows Into Oklahoma with 200-Megawatt Wind Project
    Duke Energy Renewables blows into Oklahoma with 200-megawatt wind project - Company will sell power to City Utilities of Springfield - Project pushes Duke Energy Renewables past 2,000 megawatts of wind power in U.S. New Duke Energy logo CHARLOTTE, N.C., Dec. 3, 2015 /PRNewswire/ -- Duke Energy Renewables today announced it will build a large-scale wind power project in Oklahoma, the company's first renewables project in the state. When built, it will increase Duke Energy Renewables' U.S. wind capacity to more than 2,000 megawatts (MW). Duke Energy Renewables will build, own and operate the Frontier Windpower Project, sited in Kay County, east of Blackwell, Okla. The 200-MW wind farm will produce enough emissions-free electricity to power about 60,000 homes. "We're investing heavily in renewable energy and surpassing 2,000 megawatts of wind power is a significant accomplishment for our company," said Greg Wolf, president of Duke Energy's Commercial Portfolio. "We are excited to be working with the community and local landowners as we get our first project in this wind-rich state underway. The facility will help City Utilities meet its renewable energy goals while creating economic development opportunities for Kay County." The power will be sold to City Utilities of Springfield, Mo., under a 22-year agreement. "City Utilities is pleased to partner with Duke Energy on the Frontier Windpower Project," said Scott Miller, general manager, City Utilities of Springfield. "Providing a long-term renewable source of power generation in this changing market is critical to the future of utilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Scope and Limitedness of Entrepreneurial Networks in Twente (NL) and Its German "Hinterland”
    MASTER OF SCIENCE IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY RADBOUD UNIVERSITY Borders in locally "buzzing" communication ecologies: Scope and limitedness of entrepreneurial networks in Twente (NL) and its German "hinterland” Supervisor: Prof Dr Arnoud Lagendijk Presented by: Pascal Bittner, 22nd June 2018. 2 Abstract This research provides an understanding of network –scope and –limitedness in the communication ecology of Local Buzz in border adjacent Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. It is found, that Local Buzz displays significant disruptions, along its tripartite research categories of knowledge-overspills, linkages and interdependences in the area under study. Extrapolating connectivity among regional anchor institutions with the methods of observations and interviews, it is shown how both scope and intensity are vastly limited to the domestic level. These limitations are interpreted as the manifold, structural accumulation of administrative, inter-institutional “borderednesses”. They are mainly visible in the way that the national state border poses a structural barrier for entrepreneurial vibrancy. Less visible, however, structural borders also exist on the domestic level, and cross- border networking is found to have an important side-effect of stimulating inter- institutional connectivity on this very domestic level. Directly - and as a unique advantage for regional policy making in border-adjacent regions – these domestic side-effects can be employed to increase domestic connectivity and thereby regional competitiveness. Indirectly, through the critical mass of better connected entrepreneurs and decreased domestic opportunity costs, it provides ground for a more fruitful communication ecology, stimulating network-scope and intensity across the accumulated effect of the state border. 3 TABLE OF CONTENT LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES (own elaboration, if not stated otherwise) ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Policy 11.Qxd.Qxd
    1755 Massachusetts Ave., NW Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20036 – USA T: (+1-202) 332-9312 F: (+1-202) 265-9531 E: [email protected] www.aicgs.org 34 AICGS POLICY REPORT OVERCOMING THE LETHARGY: CLIMATE CHANGE, ENERGY SECURITY, AND THE CASE FOR A THIRD INDUSTRIAL Located in Washington, D.C., the American Institute for Contemporary German Studies is an independent, non-profit public policy organization that works REVOLUTION in Germany and the United States to address current and emerging policy challenges. Founded in 1983, the Institute is affiliated with The Johns Hopkins University. The Institute is governed by its own Board of Trustees, which includes prominent German and American leaders from the business, policy, and academic communities. Alexander Ochs Building Knowledge, Insights, and Networks for German-American Relations AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR CONTEMPORARY GERMAN STUDIES THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword 3 About the Author 5 The American Institute for Contemporary German Studies strengthens the German-American relation - Chapter 1: Introduction 7 ship in an evolving Europe and changing world. The Institute produces objective and original analyses of Chapter 2: Climate Change and Energy Security: An Analysis of developments and trends in Germany, Europe, and the United States; creates new transatlantic the Challenge 9 networks; and facilitates dialogue among the busi - ness, political, and academic communities to manage Chapter 3: The Third Industrial Revolution: How It Might Look - differences and define and promote common inter - or Is It Already Happening? 17 ests. Chapter 4: Making the Economic Case for Climate Action 23 ©2008 by the American Institute for Contemporary German Studies Chapter 5: A New Era for Transatlantic Cooperation on Energy ISBN 1-933942-12-6 and Climate Change? 35 ADDITIONAL COPIES: Notes 47 Additional Copies of this Policy Report are available for $5.00 to cover postage and handling from the American Institute for Contemporary German Studies, 1755 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20036.
    [Show full text]
  • Stress Tests for UK Non Nuclear Power Plants
    Office for Nuclear Regulation An agency of HSE Stress tests for UK Non Nuclear Power Plants Progress Report 5 December 2011 Progress Report on Stress tests for UK Non Nuclear Power Plants Office for Nuclear Regulation An agency of HSE © Crown copyright 2011 First published December 2011 ONR Report ONR‐UKST‐REP‐11‐001 Revision 0 You may reuse this information (excluding logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view the licence visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open‐ government‐licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email [email protected]. Some images and illustrations may not be owned by the Crown so cannot be reproduced without permission of the copyright owner. Enquiries should be sent to [email protected]. Unless otherwise stated, all corporate names, logos, and Registered® and Trademark™ products mentioned in this Web site belong to one or more of the respective Companies or their respective licensors. They may not be used or reproduced in any manner without the prior written agreement of the owner(s). For published documents, the electronic copy on the ONR website remains the most current publicly available version and copying or printing renders this document uncontrolled. This document is issued by the Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR), an agency of HSE. For further information about ONR, or to report inconsistencies or inaccuracies in this publication please visit www.hse.gov.uk/nuclear. Progress Report on Stress tests for UK Non Nuclear Power Plants Office for Nuclear Regulation An agency of HSE Executive Summary Following the events at Fukushima, Japan on 11 March 2011, the nuclear industry in the UK responded quickly to review UK plants against seismic and flooding hazards.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Safety
    connecting global wealth creators ASIANASIANNUCLEAR NUCLEAR ENERGY ENERGY Powering Global Nuclear Commerce Vol. 2 Issue 3 Sept - Oct 2011 Learning Lessons In Nuclear Safety Dr. Eric Loewen, President, ANS ONE CONFERENCE NUCLEAR POWER THAT PROSPECT CONNECTS YOU TO THE Date: 17th-18th November, 2011 ENTIRE Venue: Kempinski Hotel Beijing LuŌhansa Center,Beijing China NUCLEAR MARKET Unrivalled Speaker represenƟng 8 fast-growing: This conference CHINA NaƟonal Nuclear Safety AdministraƟon is designed for China Nuclear Energy AssociaƟon (CNEA) industry China NaƟonal Nuclear CorporaƟon (CNNC) China Guangdong Nuclear Power Group (CGNPC) players State Nuclear Power Technology CorporaƟon (SNPTC) aiming to map out INDIA dynamic Atomic Energy Commission strategies to Department of Atomic Energy win Nuclear Power CorporaƟon of India Ltd (NPCIL) market share in a rapidly SOUTH KOREA Korea Electric Power CorporaƟon (KEPCO) changing Korea Atomic Energy Research InsƟtute (KAERI) industry Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power (KHNP) VIETNAM Vietnam Atomic Energy Commission (VAEC) Electricity of Vietnam (EVN) Register THAILAND Today! Electricity GeneraƟng Authority of Thailand (EGAT) Contact Michael LIU Via MONGOLIA T: +86 21 6840 7631 Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) F: +86 21 6840 7633 E: [email protected] USA W: www.cdmc.org.cn/npp Department of Energy (DOE) RUSSIA Rosatom 决策者会议策划集团-- 深具实力和影响力的独立品牌会议主办机构 - CDMC Events CDMC is China’s biggest large-scale B2B event company.We out-perform our competitors on the quality of the conferences we produce and the rapport we develop and maintain with our clients. +86 21 6840 7631 +86 21 6840 7633 www.cdmc.org.cn [email protected] UCLE N AR N S A O C I C R I E E ANS T M Y A • • I N N D O IA SECTI PRESENTS Friday, 30 September, 2011, Bombay Exhibition Centre, Goregaon (E), Mumbai, India.
    [Show full text]
  • Duke Energy at a Glance
    Duke Energy At A Glance Regulated Utilities Commercial Portfolio Generation Diversity (percent owned capacity)1 Generation Diversity (percent owned capacity)1 38% Natural Gas/Fuel Oil 37% Coal 100% Renewable 18% Nuclear 7% Hydro and Solar Commercial Portfolio primarily builds, develops, and operates Generated (net output gigawatt-hours (GWh))2 wind and solar renewable generation and energy transmission 36% Coal projects throughout the continental U.S. The portfolio includes nonregulated renewable energy, electric transmission, natural 34% Nuclear gas infrastructure and energy storage businesses. 29% Natural Gas/Fuel Oil Commercial Portfolio’s renewable energy includes utility-scale 1% Hydro and Solar wind and solar generation assets which total more than 2,500 MW across 12 states from more than 22 wind farms and 38 2 Customer Diversity (in billed GWh sales) commercial solar farms. Revenues are primarily generated by selling the power through long-term contracts to utilities, electric 33% Residential cooperatives, municipalities, and other customers. 31% General Services Duke Energy currently has about 1,950 MW of wind and solar 21% Industrial energy in operation (pie chart excludes 538 MW, which are 15% Wholesale/Other from equity investments) Regulated Utilities consists of Duke Energy’s regulated generation, electric and natural gas transmission and distribution systems. Regulated Utilities generation portfolio is International Energy a balanced mix of energy resources having different operating Generation Diversity (percent owned capacity)1 characteristics and fuel sources designed to provide energy at the lowest possible cost. 70% Hydro Electric Operations 22% Fuel Oil Owns approximately 50,200 megawatts (MW) of 6% Natural Gas generating capacity 2% Coal Service area covers about 95,000 square miles with International Energy principally operates and manages power an estimated population of 24 million generation facilities and engages in sales and marketing of electric power, natural gas, and natural gas liquids outside the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermal Power Plant Repowering Project in Thailand Project Design Document】
    【参考 6 Thermal Power Plant Repowering Project in Thailand Project Design Document】 Project Design Document for Thermal Power Plant Repowering Project in Thailand February 2003 165 CONTENTS A. General description of project activity..........................................................................167 B. Baseline methodology ..................................................................................................171 C. Duration of the project activity / Crediting period........................................................174 D. Monitoring methodology and plan ...............................................................................175 E. Calculations of GHG emissions by sources..................................................................179 F. Environmental impacts .................................................................................................183 G. Stakeholders comments ................................................................................................184 166 A. General description of project activity A.1 Title of the project activity Y Thermal Power Plant Repowering Project. A.2 Description of the project activity: Outline of the Project The Y Power Plant is the largest power plant in Thailand. It has total output capacity of 3,680MW. This output accounts more than 20% of the total electric power output capacity of Thailand. Both of its unit #1 and unit #2 each has an output of 550MW and they went into operation in 1983 and 1984, respectively. The amount of power generation to
    [Show full text]
  • ALL the QUEEN's AGENTS & CORPORATIONS the Queen's
    ALL THE QUEEN’S AGENTS & CORPORATIONS The Queen’s Prerogative English law prohibits questioning the Monarchy about their personal holdings and business. This is true of most of Europe’s royalty, whether enthroned or not. The wealth of the Monarchies is held outside of the countries that made the wealth. The British Crown’s offshore banks hold the greatest personal wealth in the world estimated at $35 trillion. Perhaps the British Crown still owns and controls its Commonwealth Nations, including the American “colonies.” Monarchies are not supposed to be warlord bankers who create conflict and chaos to turn a profit or destabilize an economy for personal gain. But they have been for some time now, and history is a string of immoral wars caused by monarchies, the Vatican and other religions. Untold millions have died while kings and popes lived on to grab the wealth through well-established institutions that were created to control the people of the Earth. The Commonwealth of Nations, headed by Queen Elizabeth II, is made up of 53 nations, spanning the globe, accounting for one-fifth of the land mass of the Earth, and a very high percentage of its strategic resources and population. The Queen is a Knight of Malta and has vowed allegiance to the Pope through the largest insider trading club on the planet. The British Crown Agents are, in fact, also agents of the Vatican’s Knights of Malta. The Queen is a Knight of Malta The Sovereign Military Order of Malta (SMOM) took control of the power and wealth of the Poor Fellow-Soldiers of Christ and of the Temple of Solomon from within the Roman system.
    [Show full text]
  • Tourenplanung 2021 - Schadstoffmobil
    Tourenplanung 2021 - Schadstoffmobil 21 Januar Februar März April Mai Juni Juli August September Oktober November Dezember 21 Sa 1 Tag der Arbeit Sa So 2 1 So Mo 1 1 3 2 1 Allerheiligen Mo Di 2 2 4 Ahaus innen 1 3 2 Di Mi 3 Reken 3 5 Reken 2 4 Reken 1 Reken 3 Reken 1 Reken Mi Do 4 4 1 6 Legden 3 Fronleichnam 1 5 Velen 2 4 2 Velen Do Fr 1 Neujahr 5 Gronau 5 Gronau 2 Karfreitag 7 4 2 Südlohn 6 Gronau 3 Gronau 1 5 Gronau 3 Gronau Fr Sa 2 6 Velen 6 Reken 3 8 Gronau 5 3 7 4 2 6 4 Sa So 3 7 7 4 9 6 4 8 5 3 Tag d.Einheit 7 5 So Mo 4 8 8 5 Ostermontag 10 7 5 9 6 4 8 6 Mo Di 5 9 Ahaus innen 9 Ahaus innen 6 11 8 6 10 Ahaus innen 7 Ahaus innen 5 9 7 Ahaus innen Di Mi 6 Reken 10 Isselburg 10 Ahaus außen 7 Reken 12 9 Reken 7 Reken 11 8 Ahaus außen 6 Reken 10 Ahaus außen 8 Isselburg Mi Do 7 11 Rhede 11 Rhede 8 Velen 13 Christi Himmelf. 10 Velen 8 12 Rhede 9 7 Velen 11 Rhede 9 Rhede Do Fr 8 Gronau 12 Vreden 12 Vreden 9 Gronau 14 11 Gronau 9 Gronau 13 Vreden 10 Vreden 8 12 Vreden 10 Vreden Fr Sa 9 13 13 10 15 12 10 14 Isselburg 11 Rhede 9 Gronau 13 Ahaus innen 11 Sa So 10 14 14 11 16 13 11 15 12 10 14 12 So Mo 11 15 Rosenmontag 15 12 17 14 12 16 13 11 15 13 Mo Di 12 Ahaus innen 16 16 13 Ahaus innen 18 Raesfeld 15 Ahaus innen 13 17 14 12 Ahaus innen 16 14 Heiden Di Mi 13 Ahaus außen 17 Stadtlohn 17 Stadtlohn 14 Isselburg 19 Ahaus außen 16 Isselburg 14 Ahaus außen 18 15 Stadtlohn 13 Isselburg 17 Stadtlohn 15 Stadtlohn Mi Do 14 Rhede 18 Borken 18 Borken 15 Rhede 20 Rhede 17 Rhede 15 Rhede 19 Borken 16 Borken 14 Rhede 18 Borken 16 Borken Do Fr 15 Vreden
    [Show full text]