DOCSLIB.ORG

Morristown National Historical Park Foundation Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Morristown National Historical Park Foundation Document NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Foundation Document Morristown National Historical Park New Jersey June 2018 Foundation Document MORRISTOWN 287 Museum 24 Washington Visitor Information202 Washington’s Fort Nonsense Headquarters 24 510 202 Jockey Hollow 287 Visitor Center New Jersey Brigade Area/ North Cross Estate Gardens 0 0.5 1 Kilometer 0 0.5 1 Mile Tour Road Patriots’ Path Hiking trail 287 Washington- Rochambeau National Historic Trail 202 Morristown National Historical Park Contents Mission of the National Park Service 1 Introduction 2 Part 1: Core Components 3 Brief Description of the Park 3 Park Purpose 5 Park Significance 6 Fundamental Resources and Values 7 Other Important Resources and Values 8 Interpretive Themes 9 Part 2: Dynamic Components 10 Special Mandates and Administrative Commitments 10 Special Mandates 10 Administrative Commitments 11 Assessment of Planning and Data Needs 11 Analysis of Fundamental Resources and Values 11 Analysis of Other Important Resources and Values 24 Identification of Key Issues and Associated Planning and Data Needs 29 Planning and Data Needs 30 Part 3: Contributors 34 Morristown National Historical Park 34 NPS Northeast Region 34 Other NPS Staff 34 Partners 34 Appendixes 35 Appendix A: Enabling Legislation and Legislative Acts for Morristown National Historical Park 35 Appendix B: Interpretive Theme Matrix 42 Appendix C: Inventory of Administrative Commitments 51 Appendix D: Past Park Planning and Data Collection Efforts 52 Foundation Document Morristown National Historical Park Mission of the National Park Service The National Park Service (NPS) preserves unimpaired the natural and cultural resources and values of the national park system for the enjoyment, education, and inspiration of this and future generations. The National Park Service cooperates with partners to extend the benefits of natural and cultural resource conservation and outdoor recreation throughout this country and the world. The NPS core values are a framework in which the National Park Service accomplishes its mission. They express the manner in which, both individually and collectively, the National Park Service pursues its mission. The NPS core values are: · Shared stewardship: We share a commitment to resource stewardship with the global preservation community. · Excellence: We strive continually to learn and improve so that we may achieve the highest ideals of public service. · Integrity: We deal honestly and fairly with the public and one another. · Tradition: We are proud of it; we learn from it; we are not bound by it. · Respect: We embrace each other’s differences so that we may enrich the well-being of everyone. The National Park Service is a bureau within the Department of the Interior. While numerous national park system units were created prior to 1916, it was not until August 25, 1916, that President Woodrow Wilson signed the National Park Service Organic Act formally establishing the National Park Service. The national park system continues to grow and comprises more than 400 park units covering more than 84 million acres in every state, the District of Columbia, American Samoa, Guam, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands. These units include, but are not limited to, national parks, monuments, battlefields, military parks, historical parks, historic sites, lakeshores, seashores, recreation areas, scenic rivers and trails, and the White House. The variety and diversity of park units throughout the nation require a strong commitment to resource stewardship and management to ensure both the protection and enjoyment of these resources for future generations. The arrowhead was authorized as the official National Park Service emblem by the Secretary of the Interior on July 20, 1951. The sequoia tree and bison represent vegetation and wildlife, the mountains and water represent scenic and recreational values, and the arrowhead represents historical and archeological values. 1 Foundation Document Introduction Every unit of the national park system will have a foundational document to provide basic guidance for planning and management decisions—a foundation for planning and management. The core components of a foundation document include a brief description of the park as well as the park’s purpose, significance, fundamental resources and values, other important resources and values, and interpretive themes. The foundation document also includes special mandates and administrative commitments, an assessment of planning and data needs that identifies planning issues, planning products to be developed, and the associated studies and data required for park planning. Along with the core components, the assessment provides a focus for park planning activities and establishes a baseline from which planning documents are developed. A primary benefit of developing a foundation document is the opportunity to integrate and coordinate all kinds and levels of planning from a single, shared understanding of what is most important about the park. The process of developing a foundation document begins with gathering and integrating information about the park. Next, this information is refined and focused to determine what the most important attributes of the park are. The process of preparing a foundation document aids park managers, staff, and the public in identifying and clearly stating in one document the essential information that is necessary for park management to consider when determining future planning efforts, outlining key planning issues, and protecting resources and values that are integral to park purpose and identity. While not included in this document, a park atlas is also part of a foundation project. The atlas is a series of maps compiled from available geographic information system (GIS) data on natural and cultural resources, visitor use patterns, facilities, and other topics. It serves as a GIS-based support tool for planning and park operations. The atlas is published as a (hard copy) paper product and as geospatial data for use in a web mapping environment. The park atlas for Morristown National Historical Park can be accessed online at: http://insideparkatlas.nps.gov/. 2 Morristown National Historical Park Part 1: Core Components The core components of a foundation document include a brief description of the park, park purpose, significance statements, fundamental resources and values, other important resources and values, and interpretive themes. These components are core because they typically do not change over time. Core components are expected to be used in future planning and management efforts. Brief Description of the Park Morristown National Historical Park encompasses the 18th-century village of Morristown in northern New Jersey, approximately 30 miles west of New York City. The park lies on the eastern edge of the Highlands physiographic province and west of the Watchung Mountains. To the east, the land gradually slopes to the coastal plain, which leads to the Hudson River and the Atlantic Ocean. In 1779, the Revolutionary War was going badly for the patriot cause. Earlier that year, the Continental Army had been ingloriously rousted from New York City and hounded across New Jersey by British forces. Despite successes at Trenton and Princeton in 1776–1777, General George Washington needed to find a safe and secure winter quarters within striking distance of the main British position in New York City. Morristown was selected because it was home to many who supported the patriot cause, was surrounded by rich farmland, and lay along the only communications route between the New England colonies and patriot capital in Philadelphia and the colonies to the south that was not controlled by the British. Additionally, Morristown’s location behind the Watchung Mountains and the Great Swamp protected it from incursions by the British who were based in New York City. Morristown National Historical Park totals 1,705.69 acres and is composed of four separate areas: Washington’s Headquarters, Fort Nonsense, Jockey Hollow, and the New Jersey Brigade Area. These areas are associated with the Continental Army’s Revolutionary War encampments of 1777, 1779–1780, 1780–1781, and 1781–1782. 3 Foundation Document · The Washington’s Headquarters area totals approximately 10 acres and is just outside the center of Morristown. During the 1779–1780 winter encampment, General Washington, along with his “military family” and wife Martha, were housed in the Ford mansion, which stood on a low terrace overlooking the Whippany River. · The Fort Nonsense area totals approximately 35 acres and is on Kinney’s Hill, the tallest hill overlooking the Morristown village green and the critical transportation route. During the 1777 winter encampment, a fortified position was constructed on the crest of Kinney’s Hill because it commanded the strategic position above the town and provided panoramic views to the east that included a line of hilltops between Morristown and the Hudson River where warning fires were lit signaling when British troops moved away from their base in New York City. Fort Nonsense was maintained by the army from 1777 until the end of the war. · The Jockey Hollow area totals approximately 1,339 acres and is about 3 miles southwest of Fort Nonsense. During the 1779–1780 winter encampment, a “log hut city” that housed more than 12,000 soldiers and camp followers was constructed in the small Y-shaped valley along Primrose Creek between Sugar Loaf, Tea Hill, and Mount Kemble. This
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FORD MANSION Day
    THE UPSTAIRS HALL As you enter the hall, notice the three Pennsylvania low-back Windsor chairs, circa 1750. These In this large hallway most of the winter's social activities are the earliest known American- took place. According to family tradition, the large camp chest style Windsor. to your left was left by Washington as a gift to Mrs. Ford. The folding cot would have been used by "Will," Washington's favorite servant, who as a matter of custom, slept close to the WASHINGTON'S CONFERENCE AND DINING ROOM General's bedroom. In this room the daily activities of Washington's staff were . Proceed to the next room on performed. Washington also used this room to meet with your left. officers and citizens. At 3 p.m. daily, Washington, Mrs. Washington, his staff, and guests began the main meal of the FORD MANSION day. At least three courses were served, and the meal took in THE AIDES' AND GUESTS' ROOM excess of two hours to consume. But much of that time was used to informally discuss military topics, such as supply, Most of Washington's aides slept in this room as evidenced by recruitment, and strategy for the spring campaign. the number of folding cots and traveling chests. However, when important guests came to the House, the aides moved Of special interest is the Chippendale desk thought to have into other quarters. In May of 1780, LaFayette stayed here as been here during the winter of 1779-80. Also observe the had the Spanish Ambassador Don Juan De Miralles. Chippendale mirror, a Ford family piece, with a Phoenix bird Unfortunately, De Miralles died while here as a guest of the arising from the top.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Landscapes Inventory, Jockey Hollow, Morristown National
    National Park Service Cultural Landscapes Inventory 1999 Jockey Hollow Morristown National Historical Park Table of Contents Inventory Unit Summary & Site Plan Concurrence Status Geographic Information and Location Map Management Information National Register Information Chronology & Physical History Analysis & Evaluation of Integrity Condition Treatment Bibliography & Supplemental Information Jockey Hollow Morristown National Historical Park Inventory Unit Summary & Site Plan Inventory Summary The Cultural Landscapes Inventory Overview: CLI General Information: Purpose and Goals of the CLI The Cultural Landscapes Inventory (CLI), a comprehensive inventory of all cultural landscapes in the national park system, is one of the most ambitious initiatives of the National Park Service (NPS) Park Cultural Landscapes Program. The CLI is an evaluated inventory of all landscapes having historical significance that are listed on or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, or are otherwise managed as cultural resources through a public planning process and in which the NPS has or plans to acquire any legal interest. The CLI identifies and documents each landscape’s location, size, physical development, condition, landscape characteristics, character-defining features, as well as other valuable information useful to park management. Cultural landscapes become approved CLIs when concurrence with the findings is obtained from the park superintendent and all required data fields are entered into a national database. In addition,
    [Show full text]
  • The Mountain Shadows Property Is Part of Pruddentown by Arthur
    The Mountain Shadows Property is Part of Pruddentown ountain Shadows, Thanksgiving and Christmas Jersey was occupied by a branch of situated along Mount holidays. Also occasionally a car the Delaware Indians called the MKemble Avenue in with a “Zamrok” license plate is Lenni Lenape—“original people.” historic Morris Township, is a spotted in the area—perhaps Sam The Indians came from the west colonial styled townhouse complex. Masucci is related to a Zamrok. with the Mengwe or Iroquois Fifteen single family townhouses The land occupied by Mountain tribes and occupied the region on Zamrok Way are at the base of Shadows has historical significance bordered by the great salt water the eastern face of Mount Kemble. being next to Pruddentown, a lake and bounded by four great The complex, two miles south of 1770s colonial manufacturing rivers; the Hudson, Delaware, the Morristown Green, was built in community. At the entrance to Susquehanna and Potomac. 1984, and has blended in with the Zamrok Way is a two hundred year In the 1600s, New Jersey was wooded countryside. Sam Masucci, old hickory tree that can attest to inhabited by Swedish and Dutch of Forest Dale Associates, built the changes to the landscape as settlers who traded for furs with Mountain Shadows, the Shadow Pruddentown expanded along the Native Americans. The settlers Brook Townhouses and the Mount Kemble Avenue from multiplied and in the early 1700s, Applewood homes. For several Skyline Drive to Sand Spring the land was politically subdivided years after the completion of the Road. into counties. Morris County, townhouses, the residents were originally part of Hunterdon amazed when an unknown The First Settlers County, was created in 1738, and benefactor decorated the “Zamrok The story of Mount Kemble named after the Governor of the Way” street sign with straw and Avenue and Pruddentown begins at Province, Lewis Morris.
    [Show full text]
  • The Revolutionary Struggle in New Jersey, 1776-1783
    The Revolutionary Struggle in New jersey, 1776-1783 LEWIS F. OWEN NEW JERSEY'S REVOLUTIONARY EXPERIENCE Larry R. Gerlach, Edito.r This series of publications is dedicated to the memory of Alfred E. Driscoll, governor of New Jersey from 1947 to 1954, in grateful tribute to his lifelong support of the study and teaching of the history of New Jersey and the United States. He was a member of the New Jersey Historical Commission from 1970 until his death on March 9, 1975. The Revolutionary Struggle in New Jersey, 1776-1783 LEWIS F. OWEN New jersey Historical Commission library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Owen, Lewis F The Revolutionary struggle in New Jersey, 1776-1783. (New Jersey's Revolutionary experience; 16) Bibliography: p. SUMMARY: Beginning with the British invasion of Gravesend Bay, Long Island, in August, 1 776, traces the ensuing military events which occurred in New Jersey until the end of the Revolutionary War. 1. New Jersey-History-Revolution, 1775-1783. [l. New Jersey­ History-Revolution, 1775-1783] l. Title. II. Series. E263.N5N78 no. 16 974.9'03s [974.9'03] 76-19072 Price: $.50 Designed by Peggy Lewis and Lee R. Parks Copyright "1975 by the New Jersey Historical Commission. All rights re­ served. Printed in the United States of America THE NEW JERSEY HISTORICAL COMMISSION is an official agency of the state of New Jersey, in the division of the State Library, Archives and History, Department of Education. Fred G. Burke, Commis­ sioner, Ralph H. Lataille, Deputy Commissioner. 113 West State Street, Trenton, NJ 08625 John T.
    [Show full text]
  • A Crucible of the American Revolution
    Morris town.· A Crucible of the American Revolution BRUCE W. STEWART NEW JERSEY'S REVOLUTIONARY EXPERIENCE Larry R. Gerlach, Edito,r This series of publications is dedicated to the memory of Alfred E. Driscoll, governor of New Jersey from 1947 to 1954, in grateful tribute to his lifelong support of the study and teaching of the history of New Jersey and the United States. He was a member of the New Jersey Historical Commission from 1970 until his death on March 9, 1975. Morristown: A Crucible of the American Revolution BRUCE W. STEWART New jersey Historical Commission Ubnuy of Congress Cataloging In Publication Data Stewart, Bruce W Monistown, a crucible of the Amerlcan Revolution. (New Jersey's Revolutionary experience; 3) Bibliography: p. SUMMARY: Traces the events of the Revolution that took place In and around Monistown, N.J., with emphasis on the encampment during the severe 1779-1780 winter. 1. Morristown, N.J.-History-Revolutlon, 1775-1783. [1. Morristown, N.J.-History-Revolu· tlon, 1775-1783. 2. United States-History-Revolution, 1775-1783] l. New Jersey Historical Commission. II. 11tle. Ill. Series. E263.N5N78 no. 3 [F144.M9] 974.9'03s [974.9'74'03] 75-26705 Price:$.50 Designed by Peggy Lewis and Lee R. Parks Copyright e 1975 by the New Jersey Historical Commission. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America DIE NEW JERSEY HISTORICAL COMMISSION is an official agency of the state of New Jersey, in the division of the State Llbrary, Archives and History Department of Education. Fred G. Burke, Commissioner; Ralph H.
    [Show full text]
  • Prepared in Cooperation with the NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT of ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, DIVISION of WATER RESOURCES
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY LOW-FLOW CHARACTERISTICS AND FLOW DURATION OF NEW JERSEY STREAMS By Brian D. Gillespie and Robert D. Sehopp Open-File Report 81-1110 Prepared in cooperation with the NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES Trenton, New Jersey January 1982 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JAMES G. WATT, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Tor additional information, write to: U.S. Geological Survey Room 430, Federal Building 402 East State Street Trenton, New Jersey 08608 Ill CONTENTS Page Abstract................................................... 1 Introduction............................................... 1 Method of study ............................................ 2 Flow-duration analysis..................................... 5 Low-flow frequency analysis................................ 7 Continuous gaging stations............................... 7 Partial-record sites..................................... 10 Selected references........................................ 14 Low-flow characteristics of gaging sites................... 15 Hudson, Hackensack, Passaic, Elizabeth, and Rahway River basins.............................................. 17 Station index, in downstream order..................... 19 Station descriptions and data.......................... 21 Raritan River basin...................................... 53 Station index, in downstream order..................... 55 Station descriptions and data.........................
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2018 Newsletter
    Circa 1794 The Newsletter of Rock Ford Plantation SUMMER 2018 General Hand Puppet Theatre delights audiences Calendar of Following its warmly received inaugural performance at Upcoming Special this year’s May Fair, the General Hand Puppet Theatre Events offered two performances on Sunday, June 24. Carefully staged in the festively decorated Rock Ford Barn, the ex- July: panded show resulted from the continuing collaboration between Rock Ford and The Lancaster Marionette Thea- 1: Meet the Gardener, tre. Under the direction of master puppeteer Robert Brock, 10 am - 3 pm the show used word and song from puppet versions of (weather permitting) General Hand, Kitty Hand, George and Martha Washing- ton, several Hand farm animals and “Mad King George” to charmingly recount the story of 3, 10, 17, 24 and 31: America’s struggle for independence. The expertly crafted puppets were under the control of Stories on the Porch, four Rock Ford volunteers (with musical accompaniment by Ron Peters) and followed a 10 am warm and witty script provided by Brock. Although this was a volunteer effort, the perfor- mance exhibited a high level of professionalism that was a testament to the talents of Robert 26: Lecture: Brock and to the many hours of rehearsal given by Rock Ford volunteers under his exacting “My Dear General: The tutelage. “Working with Rob was a blast,” said one of the volunteers, “but he is a perfection- Extraordinary ist and takes his craft very seriously. At times, it could get a bit like puppet boot camp.” Relationship between George Washington and The performance also included a brief demonstration by Brock of his beautifully made mari- the Marquis onettes from his show about the Lancaster-born John Durang, Early America’s first profes- de Lafayette,” sional actor and dancer.
    [Show full text]
  • SETTLERS of MORRIS COUNTY John Ford
    IN THE FOOTSTEPS OF OUR ANCESTORS … PURITANS, PATRIOTS, AND (YES) A FEW CROOKS – SETTLERS OF MORRIS COUNTY John Ford (1659 – 1721) & Elizabeth Freeman (1671 – 1772) / Daniel Goble (1669 – 1733) & Sarah Houghton (1672 – 1783) / Abraham Hathaway (1685 – 1754) & Sarah Chase (1690 – ?) / Robert Goble (1700 – 1783) & Mary Malatiah (? – ?) / Benjamin Conger (1700 – 1762) & Experience Ford (1711 – 1784) / Abraham Hathaway (1710 – bef. 1787) & Sarah _____ (? – ?) / Simeon Goble (1726 – 1777) & Abigail Conger (1732 – 1810) / Abraham Hathaway (1755 – 1831) & Sarah Goble (1757 – 1827) / John Budd (c. 1696 – c. 1757) & Mary Prudence Strange (c. 1695 – aft. 1745) — Bradley Rymph Visits to Morris County, New Jersey Sometime in the late 1600s, European- October 28‒30, 2011 ancestry colonial Americans first began June 30, 2012 settling in the portion of northwestern New Jersey that was to become Morris County. In Text and most photos © 2011 by Bradley B. Rymph “IN THE FOOTSTEPS OF OUR ANCESTORS …” HOME PAGE: http://www.bradleyrymph.com Historical marker commemorating the initial settlement in 1685 of what is now Whippany in Morris County, New Jersey. the decades that followed, members of six INITIAL MORRIS COUNTY primary family lines in our Rymph ancestry SETTLEMENT settled in the then-largely-wilderness county. Four of these lines — the Fords, the Congers, An early History of Morris County, New the Gobles, and the Hathaways — settled in Jersey, published in 1882, states that “the or around what was to become the county first actual settlement by the whites was seat of Morristown and, in the generations probably in the northeastern part of the that followed, merged their lines through county, near Pompton Plains.” On June 6, marriage.
    [Show full text]
  • The Forgotten General
    FOR REFERENCE Do Not Take From This Room 9 8 1391 3 6047 09044977 7 REF NJ974.9 HFIIfnKi.% SSf?rf?ttr" rn.fg f ° United St.?.. The Forgotten General BY ALBERT H. HEUSSER,* PATERSON, NEW JERSEY Foreword—We have honored Lafayette, Pulaski and Von Steu- ben, but we have forgotten Erskine. No monument, other than a tree planted by Washington beside his gravestone at Ringwood, N. J., has ever been erected to the memory of the noble young Scotchman who did so much to bring the War of the Revolution to a successful issue. Robert Erskine, F. R. S., the Surveyor-General of the Conti- nental Army and the trusted friend of the Commander-in-chief, was the silent man behind the scenes, who mapped out the by-ways and the back-roads over the mountains, and—by his familiarity with the great "middle-ground" between the Hudson Highlands and the Delaware—provided Washington with that thorough knowledge of the topography of the country which enabled him repeatedly to out- maneuver the enemy. It is a rare privilege to add a page to the recorded history of the American struggle for independence, and an added pleasure thereby to do justice to the name of one who, born a subject of George III, threw in his lot with the champions of American lib- erty. Although never participating in a battle, he was the means of winning many. He lost his life and his fortune for America; naught was his reward save a conscience void of offense, and the in- *Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Ga0907data.Pdf
    RICHMOND HILL PLANTATION, Ford Mansion HABS No. GA-2348-F East of Richmond Hill on Ford Neck Road Richmond Hill Vicinity Bryan County Georgia PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA Historical American Buildings Survey National Park Service Southeast Region Department of the Interior Atlanta, Georgia 30303 \ __ HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDINGS SURVEY RICHMOND HILL PLANTATION, Ford Mansion HABS No. GA-2348-F Location: East of Richmond Hill on Ford Neck Road, Richmond Hill vicinity, Bryan County, Georgia. Significance: The Ford Mansion was completed in 1937 as Henry and Clara Ford's "Southern style" winter residence. Mrs. Ford wanted a home featuring wide porches, columns, and spacious rooms like the Greek Revival style homes they had visited in such Georgia towns as Athens, Washington, and Savannah. They appreciated the beauty and privacy the surrounding Ways Station area had to offer. Description: The Ford Mansion is a two-story wood frame building with a "Savannah Gray" brick exterior. Savannah Gray brick was (and remains) a much sought after building material. The Fords purchased the Hermitage, an antebellum Greek Revival House on the Savannah River. They had the home torn down and hauled the salvaged brick about 20 miles for use in their residence. The first floor has about 3600 square feet and included a living room, dining room, library, kitchen, hallway, storage closets, and ladies and mens restrooms. The central hallway is about 1O' wide and extends from the front door to the back door. The living room is on the left of the hallway and extended from front to back of the house.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington–Rochambeau Revolutionary Route
    Resource Study & Environmental Assessment WASHINGTON–ROCHAMBEAU REVOLUTIONARY ROUTE Northeast and National Capital Regions National Park Service—U.S. Department of the Interior October 2006 ABOUT THIS DOCUMENT This document is the Resource Study and Environmental Assessment (study/EA) for the Washington-Rochambeau Revolutionary Route. It describes the National Park Service’s preferred approach to preserving and interpreting route resources and one other alternative. The evaluation of potential environmental impacts that may result from imple- mentation of these alternatives is integrated in this document. This study/EA is available for public review for a period of 30 days. During the review period, the National Park Service is accepting comments from interested parties via the Planning, Environment and Public Comment website http://parkplanning.nps.gov/, at public meetings which may be held, and at the address below. At the end of the re- view period, the National Park Service will carefully review all comments and determine whether any changes should be made to the report. No sooner than thirty (30) days from the end of the review period, the National Park Service will prepare and publish a finding of no significant impact (FONSI) to explain which alternative has been selected, and why it will not have any significant environmental impacts. A summary of responses to public comments will be prepared. Factual corrections or additional material submitted by commentators that do not affect the alternative may be incorporated in errata sheets and attached to the study/EA. The study/EA and FONSI will be transmitted to the Secretary of the Interior who will make a recommendation to Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 3. County Profile
    Section 3: County Profile SECTION 3. COUNTY PROFILE This profile describes the general information of the County (physical setting, population and demographics, general building stock, and land use and population trends) and critical facilities located within Morris County. In Section 3, specific profile information is presented and analyzed to develop an understanding of the study area, including the economic, structural, and population assets at risk and the particular concerns that may be present related to hazards analyzed (for example, a high percentage of vulnerable persons in an area). 2020 HMP Changes The “County Profile” is now located in Section 3; previously located in Section 4. It contains updated information regarding the County's physical setting, population and demographics and trends, general building stock, land use and trends, potential new development and critical facilities. This includes U.S. Census ACS 2017 data and additional information regarding the New Jersey Highlands Region in the Development Trends/Future Development subsection. Critical facilities identified as community lifelines using FEMA’s lifeline definition and seven categories were added to the inventory and described in this section. 3.1 GENERAL INFORMATION Morris County is one of the fastest growing counties in the New York-New Jersey-Connecticut metropolitan region. It is located amid rolling hills, broad valleys, and lakes approximately 30 miles northwest of New York City. The County was created by an Act of the State Legislature on March 15, 1738, separating it from Hunterdon County. Morris County was named after Colonel Lewis Morris, then Governor of the Province of New Jersey (the area that now includes Morris, Sussex, and Warren Counties).
    [Show full text]