DOCSLIB.ORG

Visions for the Whippany Watershed

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Whippany River Watershed Action Committee Visions for the Whippany Watershed 2010/2011 Annual Report The Whippany River Better Stormwater Management in Parsippany serves the only signifi- cant unconsolidated The Whippany River Watershed Action ―The WRWAC’s mission is to preserve, aquifer in northern New Committee (WRWAC) has been protect and maintain the land and water Jersey, the Buried Val- ley Aquifer system. awarded an $185,000 grant for the de- resources of the Whippany River Water- sign, engineering and monitoring of im- shed and to enhance the quality of this WRWAC has been rec- provements to stormwater run-off at the valuable resource,‖ states WRWAC Fa- ognized with the Parsippany-Troy Hills Township Police cilitator Art Vespignani. ―The Whippany USEPAs 2001 Environ- Station and Municipal Court complex. River Watershed supplies drinking water mental Quality Award to hundreds of thousands of people and NJDEPs 2002 Envi- The coveted Green Infrastructure Grant, downstream and also aids in the replen- ronmental Excellence under the auspices of the New England ishment of local aquifers.‖ Award Interstate Water Pollution Control Com- mission (NEIWPCC), was applied for by ―The Township of Parsippany-Troy Hills several state organizations. is honored that the NEIWPCC grant will be used to remedy stormwater runoff at Inside this issue: The WRWAC’s winning proposal will our police station and municipal court retrofit the existing parking lot with three complex,‖ states Mayor Jamie Barberio. NPS Grant 2 Filterra units. These units will be inserted ―We are always looking for ways to make into the existing stormwater collection our township more ecologically friendly.‖ system and will filter runoff before it reaches Troy Brook. This is a green in- The project, scheduled for completion in Geese 2 frastructure stormwater management the summer of 2012, is a joint coopera- technique, designed to better manage tive effort of the WRWAC, the Township and improve stormwater runoff making it of Parsippany Troy-Hills, Princeton Hy- Trends 3 more efficient and green-friendly. The dro, and the Rutgers Cooperative Exten- parking lot is located on Route 46 East sion of Morris County. in Parsippany. Troy Brook 3 New Look to the Annual Report Map 4 Our yearly two page 8‖x14‖ folded bro- and to residents of the 16 municipalities chure of bullet points has grown to eight that make up the Whippany River Water- pages of news and highlights of the past shed, as well as to other non-profit wa- 4 year. Readers can easily learn about the tershed organizations and funding agen- Black Brook efforts of the past year and get a good cies. sense of the role of our watershed or- ganization in Morris County, New Jersey. The annual report describes how the Speedwell 5 efforts of WRWAC are making a differ- This report gives a summary of ence through broad based community WRWAC’s program to our members, action, implementation of projects, ongo- made up of governing bodies of member ing assessment and promotion of re- Outreach 6 municipalities and their representatives, source conservation. Activities Page 2 Visions for the Whippany Watershed Reducing Non-Point Source Pollution Understanding the cause and source of bac- Jersey, prepared cost estimates and con- terial contamination in the Whippany River is ducted field sampling. Program Committee: a goal of the program committee. In 2008, the New Jersey Department of Environmental The Morris County Board of Chosen Free- holders, historically strong supporters of the George Van Orden, chairman, Protection (NJDEP) awarded a $617,100.00 WRWAC’s mission and projects, gave pre- Madison grant to the WRWAC to study non-point source pollution in the Whippany River and to liminary approval. Princeton Hydro prepared Sal Iannaccone, Hanover implement a project designed to reduce fecal designs. Meetings were held with County coliform concentrations. officials to work out details of the project. It is Brian Marshall, Mountain Lakes anticipated that bids will be taken in early In December 2009, the DEP approved retro- 2011, a construction contract awarded, and Ralph Rhodes, Mendham Town- fitting sites located in Morris Township and the project well on its way to completion. ship Parsippany as bioretention basins. These sites are located on W. Hanover Avenue at Wet weather water testing and sampling at Hank Sawoski, Morris Plains the county owned Morris View Nursing Home the eight assessment sites are still underway and the Morris County Public Safety Training through the remainder of the grant cycle. Academy. Information gleaned from the reports will sup- ply the committee with more data to combat Starting in early 2010, work began to imple- fecal coliform concentrations in the river sys- ment these projects. The WRWAC’s consult- tem. The Whippany River ing firm, Princeton Hydro of Ringoes, New Watershed Management Group is recognized by NJDEP as the entity representing the various Goose Damage Management Workshop interests within the Whippany Watershed A Goose Damage Management Workshop age and community-based education. The whose purpose is to sponsored by the Whippany Watershed Ac- ultimate goal is to reduce goose damage to improve the condition or tion Committee was held on March 25 at the parks, campuses, water bodies and other prevent further degradation Haggerty Education Center Auditorium lo- public and private lands. of the watershed. cated on the grounds of the Frelinghuysen Arboretum in Morristown, New Jersey. The Many officials and employees from Morris workshop featured several prominent speak- County, and municipalities around Morris ers and discussed goose damage manage- County attended. The workshop was open to ment techniques that have proven to be suc- the public, and included a continental break- cessful. These included habitat modification, fast. oiling and addling, dog patrols, no feed sign- Volunteers Work Towards Sustainable Goose Populations Action Committee volunteers are making a trained and join the pool of volunteers splash when it comes to goose management. needed to control geese on a regional basis. A number of WRWAC members are trained by Geese Peace as egg addlers, and have Another member reports regularly to the actively managed many nesting sites in the committee with goose counts taken at 17 Morristown area, using integrated strategies different locations throughout the watershed. to keep the goose population at bay while Big numbers have been showing up, as well respecting wildlife’s right to life. as lower numbers where goose control meth- ods are occurring. Results of 2010 efforts: 62 nests were identi- Promote fied and 300 eggs were addled. It is hoped The efforts of these volunteers are invaluable that in the near future more volunteers from no - feeding in our mission to understand and attempt to surrounding municipalities will become control non-point source pollution in the of waterfowl Whippany River Watershed. Page 3 Morris County Freeholders Continue Funding Trend Analysis The Morris County Board of Chosen Freeholders allocated temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH and conductivity which $9,000 to WRWAC in 2010 to continue the trends analysis were determined in the field, and carbonaceous 5 day bio- sampling and data collection project that has been ongoing chemical oxygen demand (CBOD-5) , total Kjeldahl Nitro- since the 1990s. The information provided by this study will gen (TKN), ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N), nitrite nitrogen provide a continuous flow of important measurements to (NO2-N), orthophosphorus (ortho-P), total phosphorus insure the improvement of the water quality of the Whippany (Total-P) total suspended solids (TDS), total alkalinity, chlo- River. rophyll A, fecal coliform and enterococcus. Water quality data was taken from 5 locations along the Water quality improvements observed over time during dry Whippany River in August during dry weather conditions. weather conditions most likely reflect upgrades made in Two more sampling events were scheduled but postponed wastewater treatment and active watershed management due to unfavorable weather conditions and will be sched- techniques. The results of the sampling will be available in a uled for 2011. Water quality parameters analyzed include report after completing and analyzing the sampling. Troy Brook Regional Stormwater Management Plan The Troy Brook watershed, located within the larger Whip- Road, a portion of the upper parking lot was fitted with pervi- pany River Watershed, is approximately 16 mi2, with 24 ous pavement, surrounding the catch basins. This allowed miles of river and more than 400 acres of lakes, including drainage of the parking lot without the cost of retrofitting the Lake Parsippany and Mountain Lake. entire parking lot. In 2007 a Regional Stormwater Management Plan was de- In the Hills of Troy Neighborhood in Parsippany (across the veloped by Rutgers Water Resources Program (Obropta and stream from the Parsippany DPW) five residences were se- Goodrow 2007) under the New Jersey Stormwater Rules lected to have rain gardens installed. The neighborhood was (N.J.A.C. 7:8). Based upon the New Jersey Department of canvassed and provided with educational literature on rain Environmental Protection’s (NJDEP’s) decision not to pro- gardens and the Troy Brook stormwater plan and five resi- ceed with the regulatory components of the Regional Storm- dences were selected to receive the rain gardens. Mainte- water rules at that time, the Plan was divided into Plan A nance manuals were developed specific to the project. (Regulatory- still awaiting NJDEP review) and Plan B (voluntary – reviewed and approved as a watershed plan to Work is scheduled to be completed at the Tivoli Garden address stormwater in the Troy Brook Watershed. Apartment Complex and The Parsippany-Troy Hills DPW in Spring 2011. The Tivoli Garden Complex will have rain gar- Under the approved Plan B, Rutgers Cooperative Extension den and a step-drop bioinfiltration system installed this has received grant funding from the NJDEP to begin to im- spring. The DPW will have a cascading set of rain gardens plement the Approved Watershed plan.
Recommended publications
  • The Mountain Shadows Property Is Part of Pruddentown by Arthur

    The Mountain Shadows Property Is Part of Pruddentown by Arthur

    The Mountain Shadows Property is Part of Pruddentown ountain Shadows, Thanksgiving and Christmas Jersey was occupied by a branch of situated along Mount holidays. Also occasionally a car the Delaware Indians called the MKemble Avenue in with a “Zamrok” license plate is Lenni Lenape—“original people.” historic Morris Township, is a spotted in the area—perhaps Sam The Indians came from the west colonial styled townhouse complex. Masucci is related to a Zamrok. with the Mengwe or Iroquois Fifteen single family townhouses The land occupied by Mountain tribes and occupied the region on Zamrok Way are at the base of Shadows has historical significance bordered by the great salt water the eastern face of Mount Kemble. being next to Pruddentown, a lake and bounded by four great The complex, two miles south of 1770s colonial manufacturing rivers; the Hudson, Delaware, the Morristown Green, was built in community. At the entrance to Susquehanna and Potomac. 1984, and has blended in with the Zamrok Way is a two hundred year In the 1600s, New Jersey was wooded countryside. Sam Masucci, old hickory tree that can attest to inhabited by Swedish and Dutch of Forest Dale Associates, built the changes to the landscape as settlers who traded for furs with Mountain Shadows, the Shadow Pruddentown expanded along the Native Americans. The settlers Brook Townhouses and the Mount Kemble Avenue from multiplied and in the early 1700s, Applewood homes. For several Skyline Drive to Sand Spring the land was politically subdivided years after the completion of the Road. into counties. Morris County, townhouses, the residents were originally part of Hunterdon amazed when an unknown The First Settlers County, was created in 1738, and benefactor decorated the “Zamrok The story of Mount Kemble named after the Governor of the Way” street sign with straw and Avenue and Pruddentown begins at Province, Lewis Morris.
  • Prepared in Cooperation with the NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT of ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, DIVISION of WATER RESOURCES

    Prepared in Cooperation with the NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT of ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, DIVISION of WATER RESOURCES

    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY LOW-FLOW CHARACTERISTICS AND FLOW DURATION OF NEW JERSEY STREAMS By Brian D. Gillespie and Robert D. Sehopp Open-File Report 81-1110 Prepared in cooperation with the NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES Trenton, New Jersey January 1982 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JAMES G. WATT, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Tor additional information, write to: U.S. Geological Survey Room 430, Federal Building 402 East State Street Trenton, New Jersey 08608 Ill CONTENTS Page Abstract................................................... 1 Introduction............................................... 1 Method of study ............................................ 2 Flow-duration analysis..................................... 5 Low-flow frequency analysis................................ 7 Continuous gaging stations............................... 7 Partial-record sites..................................... 10 Selected references........................................ 14 Low-flow characteristics of gaging sites................... 15 Hudson, Hackensack, Passaic, Elizabeth, and Rahway River basins.............................................. 17 Station index, in downstream order..................... 19 Station descriptions and data.......................... 21 Raritan River basin...................................... 53 Station index, in downstream order..................... 55 Station descriptions and data.........................
  • Section 3. County Profile

    Section 3. County Profile

    Section 3: County Profile SECTION 3. COUNTY PROFILE This profile describes the general information of the County (physical setting, population and demographics, general building stock, and land use and population trends) and critical facilities located within Morris County. In Section 3, specific profile information is presented and analyzed to develop an understanding of the study area, including the economic, structural, and population assets at risk and the particular concerns that may be present related to hazards analyzed (for example, a high percentage of vulnerable persons in an area). 2020 HMP Changes The “County Profile” is now located in Section 3; previously located in Section 4. It contains updated information regarding the County's physical setting, population and demographics and trends, general building stock, land use and trends, potential new development and critical facilities. This includes U.S. Census ACS 2017 data and additional information regarding the New Jersey Highlands Region in the Development Trends/Future Development subsection. Critical facilities identified as community lifelines using FEMA’s lifeline definition and seven categories were added to the inventory and described in this section. 3.1 GENERAL INFORMATION Morris County is one of the fastest growing counties in the New York-New Jersey-Connecticut metropolitan region. It is located amid rolling hills, broad valleys, and lakes approximately 30 miles northwest of New York City. The County was created by an Act of the State Legislature on March 15, 1738, separating it from Hunterdon County. Morris County was named after Colonel Lewis Morris, then Governor of the Province of New Jersey (the area that now includes Morris, Sussex, and Warren Counties).
  • Morristown National Historical Park Geologic Resources Inventory Report

    Morristown National Historical Park Geologic Resources Inventory Report

    National Park Service US Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Morristown National Historical Park Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRR—2014/841 ON THE COVER Cannon at Fort Nonsense overlooking Morristown. Photograph by Jared Kofsky (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported [CC BY-SA 3.0] license) available at: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fort_Nonsense_of_Morristown.JPG (accessed 12 August 2014) THIS PAGE Split-rail fence at Jockey Hollow in the winter. Photograph by Daniel Beards, available at: http://albums.phanfare.com/isolated/CUUsqZbg/1/6144461_7039483 (accessed 12 August 2014) Morristown National Historical Park Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRR—2014/841 Trista L. Thornberry-Ehrlich Colorado State University Research Associate National Park Service Geologic Resources Division Geologic Resources Inventory PO Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225 August 2014 US Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
  • Problems of Encroachment

    Problems of Encroachment

    THE PASSAIC RIVER FLOOD PLAIN AND BASIN IN NEW JERSEY PROBLEMS OF ENCROACHMENT JOSEPH WEISBERG & JOHN MARCHISIN Department of Geoscience/Geography Jersey City State College The field experience follows parts of the Passaic River The "J ersey" Highlands extends from 8;nd its tributaries beginning at the Newark Campus of Pennsylvania's Reading Hills through New Jersey and Rutgers University. The trip parallels the course of the beyond New York State. The Reading Prong, composed River. It then continues along U.S. Route 46 West to partially of the Highlands, is a series of crystalline Wayne, Oakland, Lincoln Park and Fairfield in Passaic gneiss ridges trending in a Northeast to Southwest direc~ and Essex Counties near the confluence of the major tion. These crystalline ridges are' nearly parallel tributaries; the Pequannock, Ramapo and Pompton throughout most of their length. In the upper western Rivers and returns to Newark. portion, sandstones and conglomerates are common with a veneer of glacial till dominant in the region. See The Passaic River Basin figure 3 and table 1. Created during the Wisconsin age, the present Predominantly, shales and sandstones underlie the drainage basin of the Passaic River trends in a generally Triassic lowlands. These units trend Northeast­ east-to-southeast direction in the Passaic-Essex County Southwest along extrusions and exposed intrusives of . Region. The River, rising in Mendham Township, N.1. basaltic origin. Both the sedimentary and igneous units in Morris County I receives major tributaries as the Sad­ of the Triassic Lowlands dip toward the Northwest at dle River, Mahwah River, Third River, Rockaway angles generally between 3~18 degrees.
  • APPENDIX E. RISK ASSESSMENT SUPPLEMENT This Appendix Contains Supporting Information for the Risk Assessment (Section 4) As Available

    APPENDIX E. RISK ASSESSMENT SUPPLEMENT This Appendix Contains Supporting Information for the Risk Assessment (Section 4) As Available

    Appendix E: Risk Assessment Supplement APPENDIX E. RISK ASSESSMENT SUPPLEMENT This appendix contains supporting information for the Risk Assessment (Section 4) as available. It contains excerpts of the previous events and losses as presented in the 2015 HMP, organized by hazard of concern. This information has been compiled into one appendix for ease of reference; however, it has not been updated or verified, and is reproduced as documented in the 2015 plan. In order to create a more streamlined plan, the 2020 HMP was reorganized and condensed into a practical and more readable document for the public with the goal of providing a plan easier to implement for the County and all municipalities to support future risk reduction. The information in this appendix supplements the information provided in Section 4.3 of this plan. E.1 CRITICAL FACILITIES AND LIFELINES The identification of community lifelines across Morris County provides an enhancement to the 2020 HMP. FEMA defines a lifeline as: “providing indispensable service that enables the continuous operation of critical business and government functions, and is critical to human health and safety, or economic security.” Identifying community lifelines will help government officials and stakeholders to prioritize, sequence, and focus response efforts towards maintaining or restoring the most critical services and infrastructure within their respective jurisdiction(s). Identifying potential impacts to lifelines can help to inform the planning process and determining priorities in the event an emergency occur. The following page is FEMA’s factsheet that describes lifelines further. DMA 2000 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update – Morris County, New Jersey E-1 July 2020 Community Lifelines National Response Framework Update (Fourth Edition) A lifeline provides indispensable service that What are the opportunities of enables the continuous operation of critical lifelines? business and government functions, and is critical to human health and safety, or economic security.
  • Morristown National Historical Park Foundation Document

    Morristown National Historical Park Foundation Document

    NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Foundation Document Morristown National Historical Park New Jersey June 2018 Foundation Document MORRISTOWN 287 Museum 24 Washington Visitor Information202 Washington’s Fort Nonsense Headquarters 24 510 202 Jockey Hollow 287 Visitor Center New Jersey Brigade Area/ North Cross Estate Gardens 0 0.5 1 Kilometer 0 0.5 1 Mile Tour Road Patriots’ Path Hiking trail 287 Washington- Rochambeau National Historic Trail 202 Morristown National Historical Park Contents Mission of the National Park Service 1 Introduction 2 Part 1: Core Components 3 Brief Description of the Park 3 Park Purpose 5 Park Significance 6 Fundamental Resources and Values 7 Other Important Resources and Values 8 Interpretive Themes 9 Part 2: Dynamic Components 10 Special Mandates and Administrative Commitments 10 Special Mandates 10 Administrative Commitments 11 Assessment of Planning and Data Needs 11 Analysis of Fundamental Resources and Values 11 Analysis of Other Important Resources and Values 24 Identification of Key Issues and Associated Planning and Data Needs 29 Planning and Data Needs 30 Part 3: Contributors 34 Morristown National Historical Park 34 NPS Northeast Region 34 Other NPS Staff 34 Partners 34 Appendixes 35 Appendix A: Enabling Legislation and Legislative Acts for Morristown National Historical Park 35 Appendix B: Interpretive Theme Matrix 42 Appendix C: Inventory of Administrative Commitments 51 Appendix D: Past Park Planning and Data Collection Efforts 52 Foundation Document Morristown National Historical Park Mission of the National Park Service The National Park Service (NPS) preserves unimpaired the natural and cultural resources and values of the national park system for the enjoyment, education, and inspiration of this and future generations.
  • Description of the Raritan Quadrangle

    Description of the Raritan Quadrangle

    DESCRIPTION OF THE RARITAN QUADRANGLE. By W. S. Bayley, H. B. Kiimmel, and B. D. Salisbury.« INTRODUCTION. of the province lose much of their definite character, but the Piedmont Plateau and the Appalachian Mountain belt are not Appalachian Valley is continued in the Champlain Valley of separated by a sharp geologic boundary, and in many places GENERAL RELATIONS. western Vermont. geologic formations extend continuously from the mountain Position and area. The Raritan quadrangle lies between In New Jersey the eastern part of the belt is occupied by the belt into the great valley. In the general region including parallels 40° 30' and 41° and meridians 74° 30' and 75° and broad Kittatinny Valley and the western part by the narrow northern New Jersey, southeastern New York, and eastern comprises four smaller (15') quadrangles the Hackettstown, Delaware Valley, the two being separated by the bold even- Pennsylvania, however, the conditions are somewhat different. Lake Hopatcong, High Bridge, and Somerville covering an crested ridge of Kittatinny Mountain, which, although one of Each of the physiographic subdivisions is strikingly different area of 905.27 square miles. It is in northern New Jersey the minor ridges in the Appalachian Valley belt, reaches a from the others in geologic character, although even here (see fig. 1) and includes parts of Hunterdon, Middlesex, Morris, greater altitude than the Highlands east of the valley. absolute lines can not be drawn, as some formations are com­ Somerset, Sussex, and Warren counties and contains the cities The Appalachian Valley is bounded on the east by the mon to all three.
  • Simulation of Transient Ground-Water Flow in the Valley-Fill Aquifers of the Upper Rockaway River Basin, Morris County, New Jersey

    Simulation of Transient Ground-Water Flow in the Valley-Fill Aquifers of the Upper Rockaway River Basin, Morris County, New Jersey

    U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey SIMULATION OF TRANSIENT GROUND-WATER FLOW IN THE VALLEY-FILL AQUIFERS OF THE UPPER ROCKAWAY RIVER BASIN, MORRIS COUNTY, NEW JERSEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4174 Prepared in cooperation with the NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Cover photo: View looking upstream from the gaging station on the Rockaway River above the Boonton Reservoir with weir and gage house. Photo about 1940’s. SIMULATION OF TRANSIENT GROUND-WATER FLOW IN THE VALLEY-FILL AQUIFERS OF THE UPPER ROCKAWAY RIVER BASIN, MORRIS COUNTY, NEW JERSEY by Alison D. Gordon U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4174 Prepared in cooperation with the NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION West Trenton, New Jersey 2002 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GALE A. NORTON, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director For additional information Copies of this report can be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S Geological Survey Branch of Information Services Mountain View Office Park Box 25286 810 Bear Tavern Road Denver, CO 80225-0286 West Trenton, NJ 08628 CONTENTS Page Abstract. 1 Introduction. 2 Purpose and scope . 2 Location and physical setting . 2 Site-numbering system . 3 Hydrogeology of the valley-fill aquifer system . 3 Description of hydraulic characteristics . 5 Ground-water levels and directions of flow . 6 Ground-water withdrawals . 14 Aquifer/stream interactions . 14 Simulation of ground-water flow . 18 Model design, grid, and boundary conditions . 18 Model input. 21 Recharge . 21 Hydraulic characteristics . 24 Model calibration and results .

  • Hydrologic Conditions in the Upper Rockaway River Basin

    HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS IN THE UPPER ROCKAWAY RIVER BASIN, NEW JERSEY, 1984-86 By F.L. Schaefer, P.T. Harte, J.A. Smith, and B.A. Kurtz U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 91-4169 Prepared in cooperation with the NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ENERGY West Trenton, New Jersey 1993 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, JR., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report can be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Books and Open-File Reports Section Mountain View Office Park Federal Center Suite 206 Box 25425 810 Bear Tavern Road Denver, CO 80225 West Trenton, NJ 08628 CONTENTS Page Abstract............................................................. 1 Introduction......................................................... 3 Purpose and scope............................................... 3 Previous studies................................................ 3 Site-numbering system........................................... 4 Acknowledgments................................................. 4 Description of study area............................................ 4 Climate and precipitation....................................... 7 Geohydrologic setting........................................... 7 Bedrock geology............................................ 7 Glacial deposits........................................... 9 Geohydrology............................................... 13 Water
  • Draft Section 3 – County Profile

    Draft Section 3 – County Profile

    Section 3: County Profile SECTION 3 COUNTY PROFILE The County profile describes the general information (physical setting, population and demographics, general building stock, and land use and population trends) and critical facilities located within Essex County. In Section 4 (Risk Assessment), specific profile information is presented and analyzed to develop an understanding of the study area, including the economic, structural, and population assets at risk and the particular concerns that may be present related to hazards analyzed (for example, a high percentage of vulnerable persons in an area). 3.1 PHYSICAL SETTING Essex County is located in northern New Jersey, approximately 20 miles south of the New York State border, and 10 miles west of Manhattan. The County is bordered by Passaic County to the north, Bergen County to the east-northeast, Hudson County to the east, Union County to the south and Morris County to the west. The eastern and western borders of Essex County are defined by the Passaic River. The County is separated from Morris County by the eastern branch of the Passaic River. The southeast border of the County is situated on the Newark Bay with approximately 3.5 miles of shoreline (The County’s topography is flat in the east and slowly rises toward the west upon the approach of the Watchung Mountains. The Watchung Mountains run roughly north south through the center of Essex County. To the west of the Watchung Mountain, the slope gently declines back to a flatter topography as it approaches the western branch of the Passaic River. The highest elevations in the County are located in three municipalities within the Watchung Mountain range: Essex Fells, North Caldwell and Verona, with the highest point of 691 feet above sea level.
  • Hydrology, Channel Morphology, and Holocene

    Hydrology, Channel Morphology, and Holocene

    HYDROLOGY, CHANNEL MORPHOLOGY, AND HOLOCENE SEDIMENTATION RECORD OF THE CENTRAL PASSAIC RIVER BASIN, NJ by RACHEL MACKENZIE FILO A thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Master of Science Graduate Program in Geological Sciences Written under the direction of Dr. Gail M. Ashley And approved by New Brunswick, New Jersey October 2017 ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS Hydrology, Channel Morphology, and Holocene Sedimentation Record of the Central Passaic River Basin, NJ By RACHEL MACKENZIE FILO Thesis Director: Dr. Gail M. Ashley The Passaic River Basin, which spans 935 mi² over northern New Jersey and parts of New York, is defined by both its glacial and post-glacial history. The retreating ice sheet (~22-18 ka) created Glacial Lake Passaic, impounded behind the Watchung Mountains until a new outlet was opened at Little Falls. Glacial rerouted the Passaic River to a northeastward course, with wetlands developing on the glacial lake sediments. One such wetland, the Great Piece Meadows, covers 2,343 acres of undeveloped floodplain within the Central Basin. Three oxbows within these wetlands, named Oxbow2, RC, and TZS, were cored to determine the flooding and geomorphological history of the central Passaic’s floodplain. Radiocarbon dates and grain size data suggests that oxbow TZS was cut off from the main channel around 9-9.5 ka B.P., and that the ii Oxbow2 and RC were cut off around 3.6 B.P. These dates fall within a transition from a dry to a wet period during the Holocene, which may have been a cause for the avulsions.