DOCSLIB.ORG

Long-Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy in Complex Mental Disorders: Update of a Meta-Analysis Falk Leichsenring and Sven Rabung

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Long-Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy in Complex Mental Disorders: Update of a Meta-Analysis Falk Leichsenring and Sven Rabung The British Journal of Psychiatry (2011) 199, 15–22. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.110.082776 Review article Long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy in complex mental disorders: update of a meta-analysis Falk Leichsenring and Sven Rabung Background Dose–effect relationship data suggest that short-term treatments terminated. Ten studies with 971 patients were psychotherapy is insufficient for many patients with included. chronic distress or personality disorders (complex mental disorders). Results Between-group effect sizes in favour of LTPP compared with Aims less intensive (lower dose) forms of psychotherapy ranged To examine the comparative efficacy of long-term between 0.44 and 0.68. psychodynamic psychotherapy (LTPP) in complex mental Conclusions disorders. Results suggest that LTPP is superior to less intensive forms of psychotherapy in complex mental disorders. Further Method research on long-term psychotherapy is needed, not only for We conducted a meta-analysis of controlled trials of LTPP psychodynamic psychotherapy, but also for other therapies. fulfilling the following inclusion criteria: therapy lasting for at least a year or 50 sessions; active comparison conditions; Declaration of interest prospective design; reliable and valid outcome measures; None. From both a clinical and a health-economic perspective it is mental disorders, and such patients report significantly greater important to distinguish between patients who will benefit deficits in social and occupational functioning.9,10 sufficiently from short-term psychotherapy and those for whom Some data suggest that long-term psychotherapy may be long-term psychotherapy is required. Data on dose–effect helpful for these groups of patients.1,3,11–14 This is true not relationships suggest that most patients experiencing acute distress only for psychodynamic therapy, but also for psychotherapeutic benefit from short-term psychotherapy.1 Short-term psycho- approaches that are usually short-term, such as cognitive– therapy may be defined as a treatment of up to 25 sessions;2 behavioural therapy (CBT).14,15 For long-term psychodynamic applying this definition to the data reported by Kopta et al, about psychotherapy (LTPP), however, strong evidence-based support 70% of the patients with acute distress recovered after short-term as yet is lacking. In a recent meta-analysis of the effectiveness of therapy.1 For patients with chronic distress, about 60% recovered LTTP we focused on complex mental disorders which were after 25 sessions. For patients with characterological distress, i.e. defined as personality disorders, chronic mental disorders or personality disorders, the data of Kopta et al suggest that about multiple mental disorders.16 Twenty-three studies fulfilled the 40% recovered after 25 sessions.1 Perry et al estimated the inclusion criteria. Both randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and length of treatment necessary for patients with personality quasi-experimental observational studies were included, allowing disorder to achieve recovery (defined as no longer meeting us to test for differences between study type. As the number of the full criteria for a personality disorder): according to these controlled studies was small, we calculated within-group effect estimates, half of such patients would recover after 1.3 years or sizes throughout. Large and stable effect sizes were reported for 92 sessions, and three-quarters after 2.2 years or about 216 LTPP in patients with these complex disorders.16 For the studies sessions.3 Summing up, the majority of patients with acute including control groups, we compared the within-group effect distress benefit significantly from short-term psychotherapy, sizes between the LTPP conditions and the control conditions: whereas for many patients with chronic distress and for the effect sizes for LTPP were significantly larger than those in the majority of patients with personality disorders, short-term control conditions.16 However, comparing within-group effect psychotherapy seems not to be sufficient. sizes between treatments uses treatment conditions rather than Evidence-based treatments for these groups of patients are studies as units of analysis, which may reduce the effect of particularly important. Personality disorders, for example, are randomisation.17 This may weaken internal validity, but it does not uncommon in both general and clinical populations. They not necessarily imply that internal validity is severely impaired.18 show a high comorbidity with a wide range of Axis I disorders In order to address this problem we decided to update this meta- and are significantly associated with functional impairments.4–6 analysis, including new studies where available. For the Furthermore, personality disorders were found to have a negative comparison of LTPP and the control conditions between-group prognostic impact on depressive disorders.7 For this reason, effect sizes were assessed, focusing on complex mental disorders experts recommend not focusing on the depressive disorder but as defined above. Our 2008 meta-analysis was criticised by some primarily treating the associated personality disorder.7,8 Another authors for addressing an ‘unconventionally broad research population for whom short-term treatment may not be sufficient question’ by including heterogeneous patient populations and are those with multiple mental disorders. A high proportion of comparison conditions.17 On the contrary, however, researchers patients in clinical populations have not just one but several often adopt unnecessarily narrow entry criteria; a broad 15 Leichsenring & Rabung perspective on meta-analysis covering different patient (c) active treatments applied in the control conditions; populations and settings increases the generalisability and 19 (d) prospective studies of LTPP including pre- and post-treatment usefulness of results. If results are not homogeneous, subgroup or follow-up assessments; analysis can be used to examine the reasons. In the 2008 meta- analysis we carried out several subgroup analyses for different (e) treatments must have been terminated (no study assessing diagnostic groups.16 In line with these considerations, our outcome for ongoing treatments); updated meta-analysis focused on complex mental disorders (f) use of reliable and valid outcome measures; (again defined as personality disorders, chronic mental disorders or multiple mental disorders), addressing the question whether (g) a clearly described sample of patients with ‘complex’ disorders LTPP is superior to shorter or less intensive psychotherapy in (personality disorders, chronic mental disorders or more than treating these disorders. one mental disorder); (h) adult patients (at least 18 years of age); Method (i) sufficient data to allow determination of between-group effect sizes. The procedures followed in our study are consistent with recent We collected studies of LTPP that were published between guidelines for the reporting of meta-analyses.20 January 1960 and April 2010 based on our previous meta-analysis and an updated computerised search of Medline, PsycINFO Definition of LTPP and Current Contents.16 The following search terms were Psychodynamic psychotherapy serves as an umbrella concept used: (psychodynamic OR dynamic OR psychoanalytic* OR encompassing treatments that operate on a continuum of transference-focused OR self psychology OR psychology of self) supportive–interpretive psychotherapeutic interventions.2,21–23 AND (therapy OR psychotherapy OR treatment) AND (study Interpretive interventions aim to enhance patients’ insight into OR studies OR trial*) AND (outcome OR result* OR effect* OR repetitive conflicts sustaining their problems;2 supportive change*) AND (psych* OR mental*) AND (rct* OR control* interventions aim to strengthen abilities that are temporarily OR compar*). In addition, articles and textbooks were manually inaccessible to patients owing to acute stress (e.g. traumatic searched, and we communicated with authors and experts in the events) or have not been sufficiently developed (e.g. impulse field. control in borderline personality disorder). The establishment of a helping (or therapeutic) alliance is regarded as an important Data extraction component of supportive interventions.22 Transference, defined We independently extracted the following information from the as the repetition of past experiences in present interpersonal articles: author names, publication year, psychiatric disorder relations, constitutes another important dimension of the treated with LTPP, age and gender of patients, duration of LTPP, therapeutic relationship. In psychodynamic psychotherapy, number of sessions, type of comparison group, sample size in each transference is regarded as a primary source of understanding group, use of treatment manuals (yes/no), general clinical and therapeutic change.2,22 The emphasis that psychodynamic experience of therapists (years), specific experience with the psychotherapy puts on the relational aspects of transference is a patient group under study (years), specific training of therapists key technical difference from cognitive–behavioural therapies.24 (yes/no), study design (RCT v. effectiveness), duration of follow- The use of more supportive or more interpretive (insight- up period and use of psychotropic medication.16 Disagreements enhancing) interventions depends on the patient’s needs. The were resolved by consensus. Rating was done without masking more severely disturbed a patient is or the more acute the to treatment
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Certificate in Clinical Assessment
    CERTIFICATE IN CLINICAL ASSESSMENT A one-term CPD clinical training course This clinical training course in Clinical Assessment is normally available to counsellors, psychologists and analysts registered with BACP, UKCP, BPS, or BPC. Course Assessment is often the most challenging and intriguing function of therapeutic work. When undertaking an assessment the therapist needs to be able to evaluate models of mind; while simultaneously being aware of the patient’s risk and scope for therapeutic dialogue. The therapist will also be aware of the subtle conscious and unconscious communications of the patient whilst at the same time, assessing their availability to relating, and noting their needs and concerns during the assessment interview. In It is a complex and demanding task and currently there addition to this the therapist is attempting to make seems to be limited clinical training and writing in this contact with the most troubled aspects of the field when compared with other areas of therapeutic patient in the hope of being able to evaluate intervention. This psychoanalytic course has been potential, and the capacity to engage with and designed to fill this gap. It is aimed at therapists of all tolerate psychological change. modalities to enhance their therapeutic skills as assessors. To apply Application forms and further information from: Urvi Bhatt, Education Manager tel: 020 7419 8898 email: [email protected] or on our website at http://www.thesap.org.uk/training-and-events/advanced-professional-development-courses/clinical-assessment-
    [Show full text]
  • Digging up the Past Object Relations and Subpersonalities
    DIGGING UP THE PAST OBJECT RELATIONS AND SUBPERSONALITIES by Chris Meriam Psychosynthesis Palo Alto Monograph Series ψσ Published by: Psychosynthesis Palo Alto 461 Hawthorne Avenue Palo Alto, California 94301 U.S.A. Copyright © 1994 by Chris Meriam All rights reserved. CONTENTS Preface .............................................................................. 4 Digging up the Past ....................................................... 7 Three Components of Current Subpersonality Theory ........ 8 Some Limitations of Current Subpersonality Theory ........ 11 The Nature of Object Relations ............................................... 15 A Psychoanalytic View of Splitting ......................................... 16 Psychoanalytic Object Relations ............................................. 22 A Psychosynthesis View of Splitting ...................................... 28 Psychosynthesis Object Relations ........................................... 32 The Development of Subpersonalities ................................... 37 The Anxious Pleaser ................................................................... 39 In Conclusion ............................................................................... 45 About the Author .......................................................... 49 Bibliography .................................................................. 49 P REFACE Roberto Assagioli (1965) used the term “subpersonalities” to refer to those often-conflicting, semi-autonomous subsystems within the personality which have
    [Show full text]
  • A Commonsense Reasoning Framework for Explanatory Emotion Attribution, Generation and Re-Classification
    A Commonsense Reasoning Framework for Explanatory Emotion Attribution, Generation and Re-classification Antonio Lietoa,b, Gian Luca Pozzatoa, Stefano Zoiaa, Viviana Pattia, Rossana Damianoa aUniversity of Turin, Department of Computer Science, Turin, Italy bICAR-CNR, Palermo, Italy Abstract We present DEGARI (Dynamic Emotion Generator And ReclassIfier), an explain- able system for emotion attribution and recommendation. This system relies on a re- cently introduced commonsense reasoning framework, the TCL logic, which is based on a human-like procedure for the automatic generation of novel concepts in a Descrip- tion Logics knowledge base. Starting from an ontological formalization of emotions based on the Plutchik model, known as ArsEmotica, the system exploits the logic TCL to automatically generate novel commonsense semantic representations of compound emotions (e.g. Love as derived from the combination of Joy and Trust according to Plutchik). The generated emotions correspond to prototypes, i.e. commonsense repre- sentations of given concepts, and have been used to reclassify emotion-related contents in a variety of artistic domains, ranging from art datasets to the editorial contents avail- able in RaiPlay, the online platform of RAI Radiotelevisione Italiana (the Italian public broadcasting company). We show how the reported results (evaluated in the light of the obtained reclassifications, the user ratings assigned to such reclassifications, and their arXiv:2101.04017v5 [cs.AI] 2 Jun 2021 explainability) are encouraging, and pave the way to many further research directions. Keywords: Explainable AI, Commonsense reasoning, Knowledge Generation, Concept Combination, Computational Models of Emotion 1. Introduction and Background Emotions have been acknowledged as a key part of the aesthetic experience through all ages and cultures, as witnessed by terms such as “sublime” [53] and “pathos” [52], Preprint submitted to Elsevier June 3, 2021 associated with the experience of art since the ancient times.
    [Show full text]
  • Stakeholder Position Statement on the NICE Guidelines for Depression In
    Stakeholder position statement on the NICE guideline for depression in adults Organisational signatories All-Party Parliamentary Group for Prescribed Drug Dependence: Rt Hon Sir Oliver Letwin MP, Chair Association for Dance Movement Psychotherapy UK (ADMP UK): Jackie Edwards, Chair Association for Family Therapy and Systemic Practice (AFT): Dr Reenee Singh, CEO Association for Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy in the NHS (APP): Andrew Soutter, Chair Association of Child Psychotherapists (ACP): Isobel Pick, Chair British Acupuncture Council: Robert Strange OBE, CEO British Association of Art Therapists (BAAT): Dr Val Huet (PhD), CEO British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy (BACP): Dr Andrew Reeves, Chair British Association of Social Workers: Dr Ruth Allen, CEO British Psychoanalytic Association (BPA): Dr David Simpson, President British Psychoanalytic Council (BPC): Gary Fereday, CEO British Psychoanalytic Society (and Institute of Psychoanalysis): Catalina Bronstein, President British Psychological Society (BPS): Sarb Bajwa, CEO British Psychotherapy Foundation (BPF): Mike Owen, CEO Camden Psychotherapy Unit (CPU): Ora Dresner, CEO College of Mental Health Pharmacy (CMHP): Juliet Shepherd, President Community Housing and Therapy (CHT): Dr Peter Cockersell, CEO Council for Evidence-based Psychiatry (CEP): Dr James Davies, co-founder Dochealth: Dr Antony Garelick, Director European Association for Psychotherapy (EAP): Charles Cassar, President European Association for Gestalt Therapy (EAGT): Beatrix Wimmer, President Interpersonal
    [Show full text]
  • Selves, Subpersonalities, and Internal Family Systems Leonard L
    University of Florida Levin College of Law UF Law Scholarship Repository Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship 1-1-2013 Managing Inner and Outer Conflict: Selves, Subpersonalities, and Internal Family Systems Leonard L. Riskin University of Florida Levin College of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/facultypub Part of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons, and the Psychology and Psychiatry Commons Recommended Citation Leonard L. Riskin, Managing Inner and Outer Conflict: Selves, Subpersonalities, and Internal Family Systems, 18 Harv. Negot. L. Rev. 1 (2013), available at http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/facultypub/323 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at UF Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UF Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Managing Inner and Outer Conflict: Selves, Subpersonalities, and Internal Family Systems Leonard L. Riskin* ABSTRACT This Article describes potential benefits of considering certain processes within an individual that take place in connection * Copyright © 2013 Leonard L. Riskin. Leonard L. Riskin is Chesterfield Smith Professor of Law, University of Florida Levin College of Law, and Visiting Professor, Northwestern University School of Law. This Article grew out of a presentation at a symposium entitled "The Negotiation Within," sponsored by the Harvard Negotiation Law Review in February 2010. I am grateful to the HNLR editors for inviting me, to its faculty advisor, Professor Robert Bordone, who suggested the topic and deliberately limited his explanation of what he meant by it, and to other participants in that symposium.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychology and Its History
    2 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCING PSYCHOLOGY'S HISTORY • Distinguish between primary and secondary sources of historical information and describe the kinds of primary source information typically found by historians in archives • Explain how the process of doing history can produce some degree of confidence that truth has been attained PSYCHOLOGY AND ITS HISTORY One hundred is a nice round number and a one-hundredth anniversary is ample cause for celebration. In recent years, psychologists with a sense of history have celebrated often. The festivities began back in 1979, with the centennial of the founding of Wilhelm Wundt's laboratory at Leipzig, Germany. In 1992, the American Psychological Associ­ ation (APA) created a yearlong series of events to commemorate the centennial of its founding in G. Stanley Hall's study at Clark University on July 8, 1892. During the cen­ tennial year, historical articles appeared in all of the APA's journals and a special issue of American Psychologist focused on history; several books dealing with APA's history were commissioned (e.g., Evans, Sexton, & Cadwallader, 1992); regional conventions had historical themes; and the annual convention in Washington featured events ranging from the usual symposia and invited addresses on history to a fancy dress ball at Union Station featuring period (1892) costumes and a huge APA birthday cake. Interest in psychology's history has not been limited to centennial celebrations, of course. Histories of psychology were written soon after psychology itself appeared on the academic scene (e.g., Baldwin, 1913), and at least two of psychology's most famous books, E. G.
    [Show full text]
  • Dyadic Developmental Psychotherapy
    Dyadic Developmental Psychotherapy: An Evidence-Based and Effective Treatment for Trauma and Disorders of Attachment Arthur Becker-Weidman, Ph.D. Director, Center For Family Development INTRODUCTION The purpose of this article is to outline several of the elements of Dyadic Developmental Psychotherapy and demonstrate the evidence base for those components. While there have been a two outcome studies using control groups that demonstrated the overall effectiveness of Dyadic Developmental Psychotherapy, the treatment is an integration of several approaches, methods, and techniques that each have strong evidence and empirical bases. The two outcome studies, coupled with the evidence base for the components of Dyadic Developmental Psychotherapy, provide support for the efficacy of this model of treatment. A recent meta-analysis (Craven & Lee, 2006), based on the partial and preliminary results of one study in 2004, determined that Dyadic Developmental Psychotherapy is, “supported and acceptable” (p.301). There has been a substantial amount of confusion and controversary about the diagnosis and treatment of Reactive Attachment Disorder (O’Connor & Zeanah, 2003). Attachment therapy, holding therapy, and other terms are often used interchangeably, as are RAD or Reactive Attachment Disorder, Attachment Disorder, and related terms, which only adds to the confusion. Dyadic Developmental Psychotherapy is not a “holding therapy” as defined by O’Connor and Zeanah (2003). They describe “holding therapy” as being based on “rage reduction” techniques and that, “the holding approach would be viewed as intrusive and therefore non-sensitive and counter therapeutic” (Italics added, p. 236). Dyadic Developmental Psychotherapy has as its core, or central Dyadic Developmental Psychotherapy therapeutic mechanism for treatment success, the maintenance of a contingent, collaborative, sensitive, reflective, and affectively attuned relationship between therapist and child, between caregiver and child, and between therapist and caregiver.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Report Inventory for Disorders of Extreme Stress (SIDES-SR) Manual
    Last updated 3.11.2019 Structured Interview for Disorders of Extreme Stress (SIDES) & Self-Report Inventory for Disorders of Extreme Stress (SIDES-SR) Manual Joseph Spinazzola, Ph.D. (Unpublished manuscript) DESCRIPTION The SIDES is a 45-item instrument which asks patients to describe their past and current functioning on six dimensions: (1) disorders of affect regulation, (2) amnesia and dissociation, (3) somatization, (4) disruptions in self-perception, (5) disorders in relationships with others, and (6) disrupted systems of meaning. These six dimensions represent the areas of impairment of the Disorders of Extreme Stress (DESNOS) construct. This constellation of dimensions is represented in the DSM-IV under Associated Features of PTSD (p. 425). The SIDES instrument may be administered either as a clinical interview or as a self-report measure. For each item, a respondent rates both lifetime presence (as a “yes/no” dichotomy), as well as current symptom presence and severity during the past month. Item descriptors contain concrete behavioral anchors in order to better facilitate patient responses and/or clinician ratings. The clinician-administered version of this instrument was utilized during the DSM-IV Field Trials for PTSD. Important Note: As of 2019, there are no plans for further validation or update of the SIDES instruments. Further, the DESNOS construct is not aligned with the formulation of Complex- Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (C-PTSD) that has been developed, empirically validated and formally accepted for inclusion in the 11th edition of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-II), the prevailing medical and mental health diagnostic classification system worldwide published by the World Health Organization (WHO).
    [Show full text]
  • SUBPERSONALITIES by James Vargiu the Following Article Is Taken from Synthesis Volume I: the Realization of the Self the Synthesis Press, Redwood City, CA 1974
    SUBPERSONALITIES By James Vargiu The following article is taken from Synthesis Volume I: The Realization of the Self The Synthesis Press, Redwood City, CA 1974. The Psychosynthesis Workbook exercises that have been included in this monograph was prepared with the collaboration of the Psychosynthesis Institute, San Francisco and with the assistance of the Canadian Institute of Psychosynthesis, Montreal and the Institute of Psychosynthesis, London and authors have been credited when noted. Transcribed by The Synthesis Center, Amherst, MA, 2003 Who am I? I am George. I am Peter. I am Martha. I am Judy. Whatever my name, I know that I am some one person – I sense that “I am me,” though it is hard to express what this means. When you ask me to describe it, when you press me to answer the question, “Who am I?” I waiver. I will write, “I am George.” But that doesn’t say it. I will write, “I am a teacher” because that’s my profession, but that doesn’t say it either. I will write, “I am kind,” then, “I am mean (sometimes),” “I am bold,” “I am timid,” “I am a father,” “I am faithful.” The list can extend for pages: qualities, social roles, attitudes, peculiar habits, typical foibles. The list is endless. And yet as I give more and more answers, adding complexity upon bewildering complexity (so that it might seem that the very thread of “me” would break in shreds), my sense of identity, the awareness that “I Am Me,” also gets stronger. (G.C. Taylor: The “Who Am I?” Techniques in Psychotherapy, Psychosynthesis Institute, 3352 Sacramento St., San Francisco, CA, 1968.) I see that I am one person – the same person – and that I am made up of many aspects, also and at the same time.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cultural Complex by Thomas Singer with Catherine Kaplinsky
    The Cultural Complex By Thomas Singer with Catherine Kaplinsky Reprinted through the courtesy of the editor/publisher: Thomas Singer with Catherine Kaplinsky, 2010 "Cultural Complexes in Analysis". In Jungian Psychoanalysis: Working in the Spirit of C.G. Jung , edited by Murray Stein pp. 22-37. Open Court Publishing Company, Chicago. Introduction On December 3, 1947, Dr. Joseph Henderson wrote the following in an unpublished letter to C. G. Jung: I am working on an essay, which is possibly going to become a book, called “Protestant Man,” in which I am gathering the fundamental attributes of historical development of Protestantism and trying to put them together with the modern cultural complex appearing in our Protestant patients on the psychological plane (Henderson 1947). Some sixty years later in 2007, Joe Henderson, the revered elder of the C. G. Jung Institute of San Francisco, died. He never completed the book, Protestant Man , or further elaborate on the notion of the “cultural complex,” but he did help lay the essential groundwork for building a theory of cultural complexes by describing and differentiating out from Jung’s notion of the “collective unconscious” the more specific area of unconscious activity and influence that he labelled “the cultural unconscious.” One can conceptualize this as closer to the surface of ego-consciousness than the collective unconscious, from which we understand the archetypal patterns to originate. The notion of cultural complexes was long implicit and even occasionally mentioned in the literature of Analytical Psychology, but it was not until the twenty-first century that Sam Kimbles and Tom Singer put the essential building blocks of Jung’s original complex theory and Henderson’s work on the cultural unconscious together that the potential impact of this theoretical extension of analytical psychology could begin to be appreciated and more widely applied (Singer and Kimbles 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • Stakeholder Position Statement on the NICE Guideline for Depression in Adults
    Stakeholder position statement on the NICE guideline for depression in adults Organisational signatories All-Party Parliamentary Group for Prescribed Drug Dependence: Rt Hon Sir Oliver Letwin MP, Chair Association for Dance Movement Psychotherapy UK (ADMP UK): Jackie Edwards, Chair Association for Family Therapy and Systemic Practice (AFT): Dr Reenee Singh, CEO Association for Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy in the NHS (APP): Andrew Soutter, Chair Association of Child Psychotherapists (ACP): Isobel Pick, Chair British Acupuncture Council: Robert Strange OBE, CEO British Association of Art Therapists (BAAT): Dr Val Huet (PhD), CEO British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy (BACP): Dr Andrew Reeves, Chair British Association of Social Workers: Dr Ruth Allen, CEO British Psychoanalytic Council (BPC): Gary Fereday, CEO British Psychoanalytic Society (and Institute of Psychoanalysis): Catalina Bronstein, President British Psychological Society (BPS): Sarb Bajwa, CEO British Psychotherapy Foundation (BPF): Mike Owen, CEO Camden Psychotherapy Unit (CPU): Ora Dresner, CEO College of Mental Health Pharmacy (CMHP): Juliet Shepherd, President Council for Evidence-based Psychiatry (CEP): Dr James Davies, co-founder European Association for Psychotherapy (EAP): Charles Cassar, President European Association for Gestalt Therapy (EAGT): Beatrix Wimmer, President Interpersonal Psychotherapy UK (IPT-UK): Yvonne Hemmings, Chair Metanoia Institute: Professor Sheila Owen-Jones, CEO National Survivor User Network (NSUN): Sarah Yiannoullou, Managing
    [Show full text]
  • Psychology As a Historical Science
    HISTORICAL PSYCHOLOGY 1 PSYCHOLOGY AS A HISTORICAL SCIENCE Michael Muthukrishna Department of Psychological anD Behavioral Science LonDon School of Economics anD Political Science Joseph Henrich Department of Human Evolutionary Biology HarvarD University EdwarD SlingerlanD Department of Asian StuDies University of British Columbia HISTORICAL PSYCHOLOGY 2 Abstract Psychology has traDitionally seen itself as the science of universal human cognition, anD has only recently begun seriously grappling with the issue of cross-cultural variation. Here we argue that the roots of cross-cultural variation often lie in the past. Therefore, to unDerstanD not just the way, but also why psychology varies, we also neeD to grapple with cross-temporal variation. Psychology neeDs to become a historical science. The traces of past human cognition accessible through historical texts anD artifacts can also serve as a valuable, anD yet currently almost completely unutilizeD, source of psychological Data. This data from DeaD minDs opens up a new anD untappeD, highly Diverse subject pool. The cohort effects we measure are a sliver of the temporal variation we shoulD expect over history. We review examples of research that may be classifieD as historical psychology, introDuce sources of Data anD methoDs for analyzing historical Data, explain for the critical role of theory, anD Discuss the variety of ways in which psychologists can aDD historical depth and nuance to their work. Historical psychology is a critical next step towarD becoming a genuinely universal science. Keywords: cultural evolution, cultural psychology, culture, historical Databases, large-scale textual analysis, science-humanities integration Introduction Our psychology is shapeD by our societies (Henrich 2016; Henrich et al.
    [Show full text]