The Development of Trinity Theology Within the Seventh-Day Adventist Church

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Development of Trinity Theology Within the Seventh-Day Adventist Church The Development of Trinity Theology within the Seventh-day Adventist Church Part 2 - The Father and the Son By Terry Hill This is Part 2 of a study on how trinity doctrine theology developed within the Seventh-day Adventist Church. Here we shall be taking a detailed look at what SDA’s once taught, through their various denominational publications, about the Father and the Son. We shall then compare this with what is being taught today, which, as we shall see, is something entirely different. Part 1 of this study can be found here https://theprophetstillspeaks.co.uk/History/Development_of_SDA_Trinity_Theology_ 1.pdf Overview and introduction From their very beginnings as a denomination, right through until decades after the death of Ellen White, SDA’s believed and taught that Christ, in His pre-existence, was begotten of God therefore He is truly the Son of God. God therefore, according to early SDA’s, was truly the father of Christ. During my research, I have not found anywhere, at least not during the time of Ellen White’s ministry, where this was disputed. Christ therefore, according to early Seventh-day Adventism, was truly a son – and the Father was truly a father. The article you are now reading is not simply meant to debate certain theological positions. Its intent is to show, as time has progressed, the development of theology, within Seventh- day Adventism, regarding the Father and the Son. Having said that, this author takes the view that what was believed and taught by SDA’s, during the time of Ellen White’s ministry, also for decades after her death (that God is truly a father, and Christ is truly a son), is the truth concerning these two divine personalities. Context is always very important. For this reason, I have not only quoted those things I would bring to your attention but have also included enough of the surrounding wording to show that it has not been removed from its original setting. This allows the reasoning behind the beliefs of these early SDA’s to be clearly shown. As this has made some of the quotations lengthy, I have, in red, highlighted the relevant part. I hope this adds to making this study easier to follow. This part of the study (Part 2) is divided into 2 sections. Section A reveals that the belief of these early SDA’s (that God really is the Father of Christ, and that Christ really is the Son of God) was still being taught, in our publications, even through to the 1970’s, although by then, a ‘new theology’ was fast becoming established within Seventh-day Adventism. We shall discover this ‘new theology’ in Section B. May you be blessed as you read. First published 5th February 2020 Last edited 5th February 2020 Email: [email protected] Copyright © Terry Hill 2020 1 Index Section A: Past Seventh-day Adventist Father and Son theology Period: 1850-1859 General publications …………….................................................... Page 3 Period: 1860-1869 General publications …………….................................................... Page 10 Period: 1870-1879 General publications …………....................................................... Page 18 Period: 1880- 1889 General publications …………....................................................... Page 23 Period: 1890-1899 General publications ……………………………………...………….. Page 38 E. J. Waggoner’s, ‘Christ and His Righteousness’ ……………… Page 56 The Samuel Spear article …………………………………………….. Page 61 Ellen White endorses the beliefs of SDA's concerning Christ ... Page 64 Period: 1900-1909 General publications ….………....................................................... Page 68 Period: 1910-1919 General publications ………............................................................ Page 85 The 1919 Bible Conference …………………………………………... Page 100 Period: 1920-1929 General publications ………............................................................ Page 115 Period: 1930-1939 General publications ………............................................................ Page 127 The official 1936 Godhead beliefs of SDA’s ………………………. Page 142 Period: 1940-1949 General publications …………........................................................ Page 152 Charles Longacre’s ‘Deity of Christ’ paper (1947) …………..…... Page 161 Period: 1950 onwards General publications …………........................................................ Page 165 Section B: Current (2020) Father and Son SDA theology The underlying problem ................................................................ Page 171 A role-playing trio ……………………………………………………... Page 174 Christ not begotten (not a true son) ……………………………….. Page 177 A metaphorical Father and Son …………………………………….. Page 182 Metaphors or not metaphors? ……………………………….……… Page 188 Conclusions and closing comments …………………….…………. Page 192 2 Section A: Past Seventh-day Adventist Father and Son theology Period: 1850-1859 General publications: In the Youth’s Instructor of June 1854, Uriah Smith spoke of the evils of spiritualism. “Antichrist is one that denies Christ, or opposes the doctrines of christianity; now these mediums and believers in spirit teachings do this openly. They teach that the soul is immortal; a doctrine which is not taught in the Bible; and they positively deny the divinity of Christ. So they answer exactly the description given by Peter, when he says that they "shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them." (Uriah Smith, Youth’s Instructor, June 1854, ‘The Last Time’) It is evident that Uriah Smith believed in “the divinity of Christ” (that Christ is divine). Those who did not believe this he described as “antichrist”. He also described the belief that Christ was not divine, as one of the “damnable heresies’ spoken of by Peter. This gives an indication of what the early SDA’s (although not yet officially a denomination) then believed about Christ. Notice that this was being brought to the attention of the youth. The Youth’s Instructor was launched in the August of 1852. Its first editor was James White. Its intent, which should not be necessary to explain, was to cater for the spiritual needs of the young people. Ellen White is said to have made a contribution of over 500 articles to the Youth’s Instructor. Her first was in the very first issue. It was called Communications. In this article she wrote (after explaining that Adam and Eve had forfeited eternal life by eating of the forbidden fruit) “But the Son of God, who was with the Father before the world was, took pity upon us in our lost condition, and offered to step in between us and the wrath of an offended God. Said Jesus, I will give my life for them. I will take the burden of the sins of the world upon me, and will make a way possible for these transgressors to find pardon, and enjoy thy favor again, that they may repent and keep thy commandments. and again have access to the tree of life. God consented to give his only Son to die for lost man.” (Ellen White, Youth’s Instructor, August 1852, ‘Communications’) In this very first issue of the Youth’s Instructor, an explanation was given for its production “The young, at this day, are exposed to many evils and dangers, and they must have right instruction to enable them to know how to shun them. And although the world never was so full of books and papers as at the present time, yet there is but very little written that is calculated to lead the youth to feel the need of the Saviour, and to impress them with the importance of shunning vice, and living a virtuous, sober and holy life. The young are receiving impressions, and forming characters for Eternal Life or for Death, in an unfortunate age of the world, when spiritual darkness, like the pall of death, is spread over the earth. Pride is fostered; self-will, anger and malice are not timely and faithfully rebuked.” (James White, The Youth’s Instructor, August, 1852, ‘Address’) 3 In 1854 (this was the same year as the above Uriah Smith article was published in the Youth’s Instructor), J. M. Stephenson had a book published by the Advent Review. It was called The Atonement. It was also, between August and December of the same year, published in sections in the Review and Herald. In the November 7th issue, Stephenson had this to say about Christ (this was after extensive coverage in previous sections of the meaning and the purpose of the atonement) “The pre-existence of the Son of God claims our attention. The testimony on this point is so clear and explicit, that comment will be almost unnecessary.” (J. M. Stephenson, Review and Herald, 7th November 1854, ‘The Atonement’) Stephenson then goes on to show that the Scriptures provide abundant evidence that Christ had a pre-existence with the Father (too much to quote here). Following this he says “In reference to his dignity, he is denominated the Son of God, before his incarnation. Hear his own language: "He that speaketh of himself, seeketh his own glory: but he that seeketh his glory that sent him, the same is true." John vii, 18. "Say ye of him, whom the Father hath sanctified, and sent into the world, Thou blasphemest; because I said, I am the Son of God." Chap. x, 36. "In this was manifest the love of God toward us, because God sent his only begotten Son into the world, that we might live through him. Herein is love, not that we loved God, but that he loved us, and sent his Son to be the propitiation for our sins. I John iv, 9, 10. The idea of being sent implies that he was the Son of God antecedent to his being sent. To suppose otherwise is to suppose that a father can send his son on an errand before that son has an existence, which would be manifestly absurd. "To say that God sent his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh," is equivalent to saying that the Son of God assumed our nature; he must therefore have been the Son of God before his incarnation.” (Ibid) Some may say that this is reasonably apparent, but not everyone believes that Christ, prior to the incarnation, was a son.
Recommended publications
  • Religious Tolerance and Anti-Trinitarianism: the Influence of Socinianism on English and American Leaders and the Separation of Church and State
    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Honors Theses Student Research 5-6-2021 Religious Tolerance and Anti-Trinitarianism: The Influence of Socinianism on English and American Leaders and the Separation of Church and State Keeley Harris University of Richmond Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.richmond.edu/honors-theses Part of the Political Science Commons, and the Religion Law Commons Recommended Citation Harris, Keeley, "Religious Tolerance and Anti-Trinitarianism: The Influence of Socinianism on English and American Leaders and the Separation of Church and State" (2021). Honors Theses. 1577. https://scholarship.richmond.edu/honors-theses/1577 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Religious Tolerance and Anti-Trinitarianism: The Influence of Socinianism on English and American Leaders and the Separation of Church and State By Keeley Harris Honors Thesis Submitted to: Jepson School of Leadership Studies University of Richmond Richmond, VA May 6, 2021 Advisor: Dr. Kristin M. S. Bezio Harris 1 Abstract Religious Tolerance and Anti-Trinitarianism: The Influence of Socinianism on English and American Leaders and the Separation of Church and State Keeley Harris Committee members: Dr. Kristin M. S. Bezio, Dr. George R. Goethals and Dr. Douglas L. Winiarski This research focuses on a sect of Christian thinkers who originated in mid-16th century Poland called Socinians. They had radical Christian views built upon ideas from humanism and the Protestant Reformation, including Anti-Trinitarianism and rejecting the divinity of Christ.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cross of Christ 17 As Each Tiny Detail in the Works of Nature Reveal Omething of the Artist Hand That Fa Hioned the World
    Cf"he Cross of Christ By BRO. FflRRER CASSIDY, 0. P. HE cross is prominent now. A few days ago a cross of dry ashes was printed on our foreheads; all during D Lent the cross will be preached from the pulpit, and will be followed in the fourteen Stations. On Passion Sunday it will become still more vivid in our imagination be­ cause a veil will hide it from our sight. On Good Friday Holy Church, distressed with grief, actually turn her sorrowing soul more earnestly toward the cross than to the Mass; her grief does not darken her reason-she understands that this day must be dedicated to the cross, for it was on thi day that she sprang forth from the open side of Him vVho hung on the cross. True, her voice is shaking when she narrates the seeming victory of perfidious Israel over her Spouse when they nailed Him to the eros , but the bitter story ends with a gloriou , victorious cry that the triumph finally goes to the cross: "Above all he trees of cedar, thou only art most high, thou, on which hung the Life of the world, on which Christ triumphed, and death vanquished death forever!" After that every one of her holy edifices is turned into an unadorned monstrance to display this cross of Christ. The visible world delightful to the eye; the stars of heaven, the mountains of earth, the trees, flowers, the sea, the sky, are a picture-book in which to read God's glory, for all these things are imitations of divine beauty.
    [Show full text]
  • Church History
    Village Missions Website: http://www.vmcdi.com Contenders Discipleship Initiative E-mail: [email protected] Church History Ecclesiology Church History History of Christian Doctrine Church History - Ecclesiology and the History of Christian Doctrine Contenders Discipleship Initiative – Church History Instructor’s Guide TRAINING MODULE SUMMARY Course Name Church History Course Number in Series 5 Creation Date August 2017 Created By: Russell Richardson Last Date Modified January 2018 Version Number 2 Copyright Note Contenders Bible School is a two-year ministry equipping program started in 1995 by Pastor Ron Sallee at Machias Community Church, Snohomish, WA. More information regarding the full Contenders program and copies of this guide and corresponding videos can be found at http://www.vmcontenders.org or http://www.vmcdi.com Copyright is retained by Village Missions with all rights reserved to protect the integrity of this material and the Village Missions Contenders Discipleship Initiative. Contenders Discipleship Initiative Disclaimer The views and opinions expressed in the Contenders Discipleship Initiative courses are those of the instructors and authors and do not necessarily reflect the official position of Village Missions. The viewpoints of Village Missions may be found at https://villagemissions.org/doctrinal-statement/ The Contenders program is provided free of charge and it is expected that those who receive freely will in turn give freely. Permission for non-commercial use is hereby granted but re-sale is prohibited. Copyright
    [Show full text]
  • 101 Biblical Worldview Truths
    101 Biblical Worldview Truths GOD CREATION HUMANITY MORAL ORDER PURPOSE Has to do with the nature, Has to do with what is Has to do with who and Has to do with moral Has to do with the character and role of God. made and sustained by what humans are. behavior and intention or meaning of all God. responsibility. that exists. • God is eternal, with no • The entire universe was spoken • Humans were created by God’s • Moral order is determined by • The First Commission God beginning or end . [Rom. 1:20 into existence by the Designer’s choice and design. [Gen. 1:26 God, not invented by humans. gave to human beings was to …His invisible attributes are willing choice. [Gen. 1 And God Then God said, “Let Us make [Ex. 20:1-3 And God spoke all rule over all the earth. [Gen. clearly seen…even His eternal said, “Let there be…and there man in Our image, according to these words, saying: ‘I am the 1:26-28 Then God said, ‘Let Us power and Godhead; I Tim. 1:17 was…”; Jn. 1:3 All things were Our likeness…”] Lord your God, who brought you make man in Our image, Now to the King eternal..; Deut. made through Him, and without • Man and woman were specially out of the land of Egypt, out of the according to Our likeness; let 33:27 The eternal God is your Him nothing was made that was created in the likeness and house of bondage. You shall have them have dominion over the fish refuge.] made.] image of God so that they could no other gods before Me.; Isa.
    [Show full text]
  • Jesus' Role at God's Right Hand
    Jesus’ Role at God’s Right Hand By Hiram Kemp When Jesus was on earth, he always did the things that pleased His Father (John 8:29). Jesus never committed a sin, and He never did anything that was not consistent with the will of God in Heaven. As Jesus was preparing to die on the cross, He said, “I have glorified you on earth, having finished the work that you gave me to do” (John 17:4). Jesus’ earthly mission was complete with His death, burial, resurrection and ascension. However, Jesus did not cease working completely when He returned to Heaven. The Bible depicts Jesus as being at the right hand of God in Heaven and being very active. Being at God’s right hand denotes authority, power, prestige and royalty equal to God. Jesus at God’s right hand is further evidence of His reigning and ruling as Christ (Acts 2:36; 5:33). Notice the work that Jesus does at the right hand of God. Interceding for Christians In Romans 8, Paul spoke of the victory Christians enjoy since we are free from condemnation in Christ (Romans 8:1). God’s Spirit indwells Christians, by which they can call God their Father in a special way that is foreign to the rest of the world (Romans 8:14-15). Paul goes on to say that God justifies us through Christ and that Christ is at God’s right hand, making intercession for us (Romans 8:33-34). The writer of the Book of Hebrews wrote that He “always lives to makes intercession for us” (Hebrews 7:25, ESV).
    [Show full text]
  • The God of Our Fathers
    0 The God of Our Fathers This manuscript is designed to be a catalyst for further personal study By Kelvin D Cobbin 1 The God of Our Fathers An intriguing look into the emergence of the trinity doctrine within the Seventh-Day Adventist Church Great changes to an organisation are usually long and protracted and in many cases are often undetected, except to those responsible for instigating the change. Throughout this paper I have endeavoured to give an accurate account of the most significant theological shift to have ever taken place in the Seventh-Day Adventist Church. There has been a considerable amount of material written in regards to this change from those endeavouring to justify the change, and on the other hand, those who are disturbed with the change and feel that not only was it unjustified but it has plunged the church and its future into jeopardy. It is my intention to put together a compelling account, from historical records, from biblical evaluation, and from the prophet to the remnant to show that this change was indeed the most extraordinary shift of fundamental belief within the history of our Denomination. There’s a promise from God to Israel in Isa 42:16 which I believe is for just such a time “...I will make darkness light before them and crooked things straight...” BBBibleBible quotes from the King James Version 2 TTTheThheehe GGooGodGoddd ooffof OOuurrOur FFaatthheerrssFathers FFoorrwwaarrddForward It was in 1996 that I was first challenged to take another look at the doctrine of the trinity which, I thought, could be clearly supported from the Bible.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sinlessness of Jesus: an Evidence for Chris- Tianity
    The Sinlessness of Jesus: An Evidence for Chris- tianity. Author(s): Ullmann, Carl (1796-1865) Publisher: Grand Rapids, MI: Christian Classics Ethereal Library i Contents Title Page 1 Pefatory Material 3 Advertisement. 3 From the Preface to the Sixth Edition. 4 Preface to the Seventh Edition. 6 Contents. 8 Introduction 10 Part First. The Idea of Sinlessness. 18 Introduction. 19 Chapter I. Of Sin. 20 Chapter II. Of Sinlessness. 31 Part Second. The Sinless Holiness of Christ. 35 Introduction. 36 Chapter I. Testimony to the Sinlessness of Christ. 37 Sec. 1.—By Others. 38 Sec. 2—The Testimony of Jesus to Himself. 57 Chapter II. The Sinlessness of Christ Proved from the Effects Produced by His 66 Manifestation. Sec. 1.—The New Life of Christianity in its Moral and Religious Aspects. 67 Sec. 2.—Morality and Religion united in Holiness. 72 Sec. 3—These Effects caused not by an Idea, but by an Actual Person. 74 Part Third. Objections. 82 Introduction. 83 Chapter I. Arguments Against the Actual Sinlessness of Jesus. 85 Sec. 1—The Development of the Person of Jesus. 86 Sec. 2.—The Development of the Messianic Plan. 90 ii Sec. 3.—The Temptation. 96 Sec. 4.—Other Acts and Expressions of Jesus, as Arguments against His 110 Sinlessness. Chapter II. Arguments Against the Possibility of Sinlessness in General. 120 Introduction. 121 Sec. 1.—Arguments drawn from Experience. 122 Sec. 2.—Arguments drawn from the Nature of the Moral Idea. 128 Part Fourth. Inferences from the Foregoing Facts and Arguments. 134 Introduction. 135 Chapter I. Significance of Sinlessness with Respect to the Person of Christ.
    [Show full text]
  • Evangelicals and Political Power in Latin America JOSÉ LUIS PÉREZ GUADALUPE
    Evangelicals and Political Power in Latin America in Latin America Power and Political Evangelicals JOSÉ LUIS PÉREZ GUADALUPE We are a political foundation that is active One of the most noticeable changes in Latin America in 18 forums for civic education and regional offices throughout Germany. during recent decades has been the rise of the Evangeli- Around 100 offices abroad oversee cal churches from a minority to a powerful factor. This projects in more than 120 countries. Our José Luis Pérez Guadalupe is a professor applies not only to their cultural and social role but increa- headquarters are split between Sankt and researcher at the Universidad del Pacífico Augustin near Bonn and Berlin. singly also to their involvement in politics. While this Postgraduate School, an advisor to the Konrad Adenauer and his principles Peruvian Episcopal Conference (Conferencia development has been evident to observers for quite a define our guidelines, our duty and our Episcopal Peruana) and Vice-President of the while, it especially caught the world´s attention in 2018 mission. The foundation adopted the Institute of Social-Christian Studies of Peru when an Evangelical pastor, Fabricio Alvarado, won the name of the first German Federal Chan- (Instituto de Estudios Social Cristianos - IESC). cellor in 1964 after it emerged from the He has also been in public office as the Minis- first round of the presidential elections in Costa Rica and Society for Christian Democratic Educa- ter of Interior (2015-2016) and President of the — even more so — when Jair Bolsonaro became Presi- tion, which was founded in 1955. National Penitentiary Institute of Peru (Institu- dent of Brazil relying heavily on his close ties to the coun- to Nacional Penitenciario del Perú) We are committed to peace, freedom and (2011-2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Gospel of Mark Sampler
    GOSPEL OF MARK SAMPLER ® “Then he said to me, ‘These words are faithful and true.’” Revelation 22:6a, Christian Standard Bible FAITHFUL AND TRUE. These words describe God’s Word (Rev. 22:6). As a Christian leader, you want to be “faithful” and “true” to the Word that reveals God’s character and transforms lives. At LifeWay, we share your commitment to God’s Word, and that is why we are delighted to present you with the Gospel of Mark in the new Christian Standard Bible (CSB), a translation that combines accuracy and readability, without compromise. The Christian Standard Bible was developed by a team of top biblical scholars from a variety of conservative denominations. As you will see, they have delivered a translation that hits the sweet spot of that balance between fidelity and readability. The Gospel of Mark was my first encounter with the Christian Standard Bible. When I began reading through this Gospel, I hoped to experience afresh the good news of Jesus through a translation that communicates ancient truths to a contemporary audience as faithfully and clearly as possible. I wasn’t disappointed. By the time I had finished the first chapter, I was already excited to see how the CSB captured the urgent feel of Mark’s narrative. As I read further, I loved seeing how the translation opted for a word-for-word rendering wherever the text was clearly understandable, while also employing a more dynamic translation wherever a word- for-word approach would obscure the original meaning. As a pastor, I have grown confident in the CSB’s accuracy and precision.
    [Show full text]
  • Isaac Newton, Socinianism And“Theonesupremegod”
    Mulsow-Rohls. 11_Snobelen. Proef 1. 12-5-2005:15.16, page 241. ISAAC NEWTON, SOCINIANISM AND“THEONESUPREMEGOD” Stephen David Snobelen … we know that an idol is nothing in the world, and that there is none other God but one. For though there be that are called gods, whether in heaven or in earth, (as there be gods many, and lords many,) but to us there is but one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we in him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we by him. (1Corinthians 8:4–6) 1. Isaac Newton and Socinianism Isaac Newton was not a Socinian.1 That is to say, he was not a commu- nicant member of the Polish Brethren, nor did he explicitly embrace the Socinian Christology. What is more, Newton never expressly ac- knowledged any debt to Socinianism—characterised in his day as a heresy more dangerous than Arianism—and his only overt comment 1 The first version of this paper was written in 1997 as an MPhil assignment in History and Philosophy of Science at the University of Cambridge. I am grateful to Peter Lipton and my supervisor Simon Schaffer for their invaluable help at that time, along with David Money, who kindly refined my Latin translations. A later version of the paper was presented in November 2000 as a lecture in the Department of Early Hungarian Literature at the University of Szeged in Hungary. I benefited greatly from the knowledge and expertise of the scholars of the early modern Polish Brethren and Hungarian Unitarians associated with that department.
    [Show full text]
  • Plymouth Church Shares the Worship of God
    Plymouth Church Shares the Worship of God May 24, 2020 11:00 AM The Seventh Sunday of Easter plymouthchurch.org/sunday-worship Learning our story means learning the larger story of revelation, of God and God’s movement in history. Then it means hearing the smaller story of ourselves, of God’s movement in our own personal history. —William Bausch Lift your hearts. We lift them to the Lord. INTROIT When Stephen, Full of Power and Grace Irish Melody Nathan Rodriguez, soloist When Stephen, full of power and grace, went forth throughout the land, he bore no shield before his face, no weapon in his hand. But only in his heart a flame and on his lips a sword wherewith he smote and overcame the foemen of the Lord. When Stephen preached against the laws and by those laws was tried, he had no friend to plead his cause, no spokesman at his side. But only in his heart a flame and in his eyes a light wherewith God’s daybreak to proclaim and rend the veils of night. CALL TO WORSHIP Julia Rassmann Leader: God is in our midst, forming us to be God’s own people. All: Though the way may be difficult, God will be with us. Leader: We need not fear. BOLD: SPOKEN OR SUNG AS A COMMUNITY All: In God we will take refuge. God is our strength. Leader: Come to God, who will surround you with kindness. All: God, open our hearts and spirits so that we may faithfully serve you. HYMN OF PRAISE I Love Your Church, O God INVOCATION AND LORD’S PRAYER Our Father, who art in heaven, hallowed be thy name.
    [Show full text]
  • The Doctrine of Sin in the Thought of George R. Knight: Its Context and Implications
    Andrews University Digital Commons @ Andrews University Master's Theses Graduate Research 2009 The Doctrine of Sin in the Thought of George R. Knight: Its Context and Implications Jamie Kiley Andrews University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/theses Recommended Citation Kiley, Jamie, "The Doctrine of Sin in the Thought of George R. Knight: Its Context and Implications" (2009). Master's Theses. 47. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/theses/47 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Research at Digital Commons @ Andrews University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Andrews University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Thank you for your interest in the Andrews University Digital Library of Dissertations and Theses. Please honor the copyright of this document by not duplicating or distributing additional copies in any form without the author’s express written permission. Thanks for your cooperation. ABSTRACT THE DOCTRINE OF SIN IN THE THOUGHT OF GEORGE R. KNIGHT: ITS CONTEXT AND IMPLICATIONS by Jamie Kiley Adviser: Denis Fortin ABSTRACT OF GRADUATE STUDENT RESEARCH Thesis Andrews University Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary Title: THE DOCTRINE OF SIN IN THE THOUGHT OF GEORGE R. KNIGHT: ITS CONTEXT AND IMPLICATIONS Name of researcher: Jamie Kiley Name and degree of faculty adviser: Denis Fortin, Ph.D. Date completed: December 2009 George R. Knight attempts to chart a middle course between various historical extremes on the doctrine of sin. His view of the Fall and of the consequent effects on human nature is not as pessimistic as that of theologians in the Augustinian tradition (including Martin Luther and John Calvin), who stress the complete corruption of human nature and the loss of free will.
    [Show full text]