DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 10 [315KB]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter 10 [315KB] CHAPTER 10 CONSULTATION RESULTS 10.1 INTRODUCTION 10.1.1 The consultation period on the Local Implementation Plan and accompanying Environmental Report was from the 31st May to the 8th August 2005. The LIP document and accompanying Environmental Report were made available on the Council’s website (www.hillingdon.gov.uk) during the consultation period. Hard copies and copies of the documents on CD-Rom were also made available from the Transportation and Policy and Projects Team. 10.1.2 Reference copies were made available at all borough libraries, Hayes One Stop Shop and the Planning and Transportation Group reception at the Civic Centre, Uxbridge. 10.1.3 Under section 145 of the GLA Act, boroughs were required to consult on their draft LIP with: • The relevant Commissioners (Metropolitan Police Service and City Police) • Transport for London • Such organisations representative of disabled people • Each other London Borough whose area is likely to be affected by the plan. • Councils were also recommended to consult: • London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority (LFEPA) and London Ambulance Service representatives • The Highway Agency • Network Rail and the SRA, where appropriate • Local Mobility Forum • Representatives of business, local environment, transport and community groups • Neighbouring Local Authorities 10.1.4 Hillingdon Council consulted all the above and also many interested members of the public including Residents Associations. 31 public responses were received, during the consultation process, from members of the public, resident associations and other transport stakeholders. Overall, there were many objections to lowering South Ruislip Railway Bridge. There were also concerns raised about how the borough’s roads would cope with new infrastructure and associated traffic growth. 10.1.5 As part of the consultation process a presentation was given at the Hillingdon Motorist’s Forum meeting in May 2005 to inform members of what the LIP contained. A presentation on the LIP was also given to the Hillingdon Learning Disabilities Forum in August 2005. 10.2 TRANSPORT FOR LONDON COMMENTS 10.2.1 In TfL’s response to the draft LIP it was considered that 46 of the 82 relevant, separate ‘must’ requirements complied with LIP guidance and 28 of the 49 similar ‘encouraged’ requirements comply. Overall, TfL assessed the LIP as, likely to meet the requirements of the Mayor’s Transport Strategy with a few additions and/or adjustments. 10.2.2 Careful consideration has been given to TfL comments received. Revised information for the final document included: • More detailed financial information in line with the 2006/07 BSP funding allocation 273 • Performance measures and how we are going to meet the specified Mayor’s Transport Strategy’s targets. • Further detail of transport programmes including timeframes. • Linkages to the emerging Local Development Framework. 10.2.4 A meeting was held with TfL in February to address any outstanding issues before the report was finalised through Cabinet. The LIP must comply with all ‘must’ requirements before the Mayor can approve it. 274 10.3 SUMMARY OF CONSULTATION COMMENTS Response Unique Summary of comment Officer Response received referencing From: number London No specific comments No action required Ambulance Service LAS001 Harmondsworth HSRA001 The use of 20mph zones in through roads increases noise, retains Safety is the main priority for site selection. and Sipson vehicles in roads for longer and increases pollution. Pollution as a result of slowed vehicles has been Residents recognised. Association HSRA002 There are no Home Zones/Streets for People schemes proposed for the Sites for the programme have not yet been HSRA002 Harmondsworth and Sipson area identified. HSRA003 The Safety Camera Programme should clearly indicate where cameras All speed sites (core, exceptional and roadworks) are and what motorists are being asked to do must comply with the safety camera programme signing rules and all traffic signs must fully comply with the statutory requirements of the current Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions (TSRGD) or be specifically authorised by DFT. Signing is required so that drivers can be fully aware of the existence of a camera safety site. More information on signing, visibility and conspicuity rules can be found at www.dft.gov.uk . A map of where safety cameras are located is now included in the appendices of the LIP. HSRA004 Bus lanes should be limited in number and targeted to areas where they Bus lanes are targeted to areas where they are are most needed. Bus lanes help bus movements but can cause most needed. The Council meets on a quarterly considerable congestion and resentment from other road users when basis with traffic stakeholders to discuss bus they can be empty for a large proportion of the time, especially out of priority. From this both short and long term bus rush hour priority improvements are developed and refined. 275 HSRA005 The Harmondsworth and Sipson area does not have sufficient air quality This issue should be addressed through the monitors. The aviation industry should pay for additional monitors as Project for Sustainable Development of traffic numbers are directly related to the increase in airport business. Heathrow. Pollution is also caused by aircrafts. HSRA006 Developers should provide 100% of the parking needed for their Parking provision of developers is covered in the activities. This should help avoid the major problems of parking in draft Local Development Framework – policy local roads. CP35. HSRA007 Controlled parking zones in the Harmondsworth and Sipson area should This issue should be addressed through the be completely free to all residents, however many vehicles there are, Project for Sustainable Development of and paid for by the aviation industry and any other developers who do Heathrow. not provide adequate parking on site. HSRA008 To reduce traffic in local roads, no firms should be allowed to run Parking provision of developers is covered in the parking businesses on Green Belt/farming land and rigorous draft Local Development Framework – policy enforcement action should be taken against those who breach planning CP35. law HSRA009 Accessibility and Social Inclusion – In support of provisions in the LIP Form 32 has been amended to include those that for mobility impaired. However, should include those that are are temporarily immobile. temporarily immobile. HSRA010 Support Crime and Disorder Programme. More police on the streets, As part of the Safer Travel at Night Proposal the especially on foot patrol, would be the best means of deterring crime. Council will work with the Metropolitan Police to make travel safer in the borough. HSRA011 Emphasise safety as being important for all walkers of all ages. This Pedestrian footpaths, footways and lighting includes keeping footways and footpaths being kept in good condition. programme addresses street lighting and Street lighting is an important feature to help people to feel safe. pedestrian safety issues. In general, however, policing issues are not dealt with in the LIP but are included in Hillingdon’s Community Safety Strategy 2005-2008. HSRA012 Pedestrian crossings need to be checked to ensure that there is adequate Form 35 has been amended to include this time given for elderly people and mothers with children to cross safely. HSRA013 Priority should be given to the elimination of vandalism in parks where Vandalism is dealt with by the Parks Patrols or footpaths run. referred to Street Cleansing. HSRA014 Concern with some of the existing cycle lanes on the main roads. Some Form number 40 has been amended to take this of the cycle lanes go nowhere; some are only a couple of meters long, into consideration. and some are not marked well. The legal position relating to the lanes is not clear to motorists. Have reservations about combining footways and cycle-ways 276 Other • Support the cycle parking and training programmes Comments • 20mph zone welcomed in Harmondsworth High Street/Moor Lane (this is a cul-de-sac where speed is an increasing Made problem • Support Crossrail • Opposed to both central and local government policies on parking. • Concern over Tram proposal - do not wish to see it extended to the Harmondsworth and Sipson area? Support improvement of Uxbridge Bus Station, as it is congested and dangerous for pedestrians alighting from the bus and going to the station and to the Chimes shopping centre Liftshare.com LS015 Currently no mention of car sharing in LIP. Liftshare.com is a scheme Form number 17 has been amended to include Ltd funded initially through Transport for London for all of Greater London car sharing initiatives. including the Borough of Hillingdon. Trevor Spencer TS016 South Ruislip Railway Bridge – Concern over the encouragement of This concern has been noted. The proposal has HGV. This is an area that is already congested. Increasing vehicle now been changed to explore alternative routes usage in this area would lead to increased accidents. for lorry movement in the Ruislip area. The funding being sought is for feasibility work of options to reduce lorry mileage and improve air quality in the Ruislip area. Karen D Ward KW017 • South Ruislip Railway Bridge – Against allowing lorries down This concern has been noted. The proposal has Station Approach. Traffic is currently congested around Sainsbury’s now been changed to explore alternative routes especially at peak times. Concern about the road not being wide for lorry movement in the Ruislip area. The enough to cope with lorries. This would lead to increased funding being sought is for feasibility work of congestion. options to reduce lorry mileage and improve air • Concern about the lowering of the bridge and where the water will quality in the Ruislip area. be drained. • Concern over the disruption/congestion that construction would have. This may effect traffic movement coming off the A40 which may lead to accidents. • Suggest that the council gets an access slip coming from the A40, between Polish and Target.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pre-Departure Guide 2013
    PRE-DEPARTURE GUIDE 2013 University Programmes LIBT London IBT Pre-departure Guide 2013 1 PREPARING OVERVIEW FOR YOUR DEPARTURE to London, United Kingdom Contents Welcome . 1 London: the world in one city . 2 Student services . 4 Entry clearance and visa guide . 5 Preparing to leave home . 6 Arriving in the UK . 7 Your first weeks in the UK . 11 Getting started at LIBT . 12 Practical information . 13 Important websites . 13 Welcome I warmly congratulate you on your in education and understanding the acceptance at London IBT Ltd, established cultural adjustments required when in association with Brunel University, students move to a new country . London . All staff at LIBT look forward to welcoming you and will assist you with all LIBT Reception is open Monday to Friday, the important aspects of your time with us . from 8 .30am to 5 00pm. The office is closed on weekends, however if you have an This Pre-Departure Guide for International emergency then we have a 24-hour helpline Students contains important information where one of the team will be able to assist . regarding your arrival in the UK . Please read through this guide before your arrival On behalf of the staff of LIBT, I wish you in the UK as it provides you with some success with your studies, an enjoyable and important information . rewarding time in London and, above all, your move towards your degree qualification You may be assured that we are all fully and the start of a successful career . committed to ensuring that your studies Christine Vincent with us are successful and I hope you find College Director / Principal your time with us an enjoyable one .
    [Show full text]
  • Public Session
    PUBLIC SESSION MINUTES OF ORAL EVIDENCE taken before HIGH SPEED RAIL COMMITTEE On the HIGH SPEED RAIL (LONDON – WEST MIDLANDS) BILL Tuesday 23 June 2015 (Afternoon) In Committee Room 5 PRESENT: Mr Robert Syms (Chair) Mr Henry Bellingham Sir Peter Bottomley Ian Mearns _____________ IN ATTENDANCE Mr James Strachan QC, Counsel, Department for Transport Witnesses: Mr John Donovan Mr Robert Jones-Owen Mrs Beryl Upton Ms Kirsty Gibbs Ms KJ Alonso and Mr KJ West Ms Gayle Metcalfe and Pauline Woodham Mr Ian Phillips Ms Susan Crane and Mr David Crane Mr Henry Gardner, Governor, Vyners School _____________ IN PUBLIC SESSION INDEX Subject Page John Donovan, Beryl Upton, Robert Jones-Owen and others (continued) Closing submissions by Mr Donovan 3 Submissions by Mrs Upton 4 Submissions by Mr Jones-Owen 12 Response from Mr Strachan 18 Kirsty Gibbs and others Submissions by Ms Gibbs 28 Response from Mr Strachan 33 Ms KJ Alonso and Mr KJ West Submissions by Ms Alonso 36 Submissions by Mr West 37 Response from Mr Strachan 39 Gayle Metcalfe and Pauline Woodham and others Submissions by Ms Metcalfe 41 Response from Mr Strachan 50 Ian Phillips, Susan Crane and others Submissions by Mr Phillips 61 Submissions by Mr Crane 69 Submissions by Ms Crane 76 Response from Mr Strachan 79 The Governing Body of Vyners School Submissions by Mr Gardner 84 Response from Mr Strachan 99 2 1. CHAIR: Order, order. We’re back this afternoon with HS2 Select Committee, dealing with petitions 728, 717, 730, 729, 724 and 1264. Mr Donovan. John Donovan, Beryl Upton, Robert Jones-Owen and others (continued) 2.
    [Show full text]
  • ID Site Name Land Ownership Borough No. of Rapid Charge
    No. of Rapid Charge Points per ID Site name Land Ownership Borough site Site Live Date 3. Lidlington Place, loading bay on south side of carriageway 299 outside Escape Sports Bar and Restaurant TFL Highway Camden 1 13/12/2017 228 London Road south of Heathview Road TFL Highway Croydon 1 15/12/2017 641 A243 TLRN - Ace Parade, side road on the TLRN TFL Highway Kingston upon Thames 1 22/11/2017 711 76-80 Tower Bridge Road TFL Highway Southwark 1 06/12/2017 714 103 Southwark Street TFL Highway Southwark 1 05/12/2017 74 Old Dover Road west of Dornberg Close - car park Borough Land Greenwich 1 18/12/2017 715 76 Southwark Street TFL Highway Southwark 1 12/12/2017 717 48 Southwark Street TFL Highway Southwark 1 11/12/2017 719 49 Southwark Street TFL Highway Southwark 1 12/12/2017 535 Arnos Grove Station Car Park TfL Land Enfield 1 11/10/2017 553 Oakwood Station Car Park TfL Land Enfield 1 11/10/2017 108 Heathrow Private Land Hillingdon 7 21/12/2017 729 Great Dover Street northbound, TFL Highway Southwark 1 13/12/2017 745 16 Talgarth Road TFL Highway Hammersmith & Fulham 1 13/12/2017 857 38 Great Cambridge Road TFL Highway Haringey 1 19/12/2017 2 Upper Richmond Road west of Coval Rd TFL Highway Richmond 1 24/01/2018 536 Brent Cross Station Car Park TfL Land Barnet 1 10/11/2017 539 Fairlop Station Car Park TfL Land Redbridge 1 10/11/2017 129 A205 Upper Richmond Road West east of Carlton Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Underground Diary
    UNDERGROUND DIARY AUGUST 2009 On Saturday 1 August, an unattended item in a cross-passage between the Piccadilly Line platforms at King’s Cross suspended services between Hyde Park Corner and Arnos Grove from 12.05 for 40 minutes. A signal failure at Heathrow Terminal 5 began at 21.10 but had little effect on the service. However, a total failure at 23.20 suspended services between T123 and T5 through to the end of traffic. There was nothing untoward to note for Sunday 2 August. Monday 3 August may be summarised as follows: A Metropolitan Line train from Neasden depot accepted a wrong signal and ended up in the northbound Jubilee Line platform at Wembley Park at 06.10, the train then being returned to depot. A ‘bridge bash’ between Gunnersbury and Kew Gardens suspended the Richmond branch of the District Line from 12.00 to 12.45. Metropolitan Line service to the City suspended 15.15 to 16.05 – signal failure at Farringdon. A multiple signal failure between Hammersmith and Barons Court suspended the Piccadilly Line between Acton Town and Hyde Park Corner from 18.05 to 18.40. A northbound Victoria Line train stalled in Victoria platform at 10.00 on Tuesday 4 August, suspending services south of Warren Street. The offending train was reversed back to Victoria sidings and services resumed at 10.25. The service south of Warren Street was again suspended from 10.45 because of a person under a northbound train at Victoria. The passengers on the train stalled approaching Victoria were walked forward to the station and were clear by 12.00.
    [Show full text]
  • In Your Area 3: Ruislip and Ickenham
    LOCAL AREA High Speed Rail Consultation In Your Area 3: Ruislip and Ickenham Find out here about: • what is proposed between Ruislip and Ickenham; • what this means for people living in and around Ruislip and Ickenham; and • what would happen during construction. What is proposed between What this means for people Ruislip and Ickenham? living in and around Ruislip and Ickenham. From Northolt Junction heading north west the proposed route for the high speed line would Property and Land be joined by the existing Chiltern Line from For much of its length the existing railway Marylebone, and from that point the two lines, corridor is bounded by residential and light and the Central Line, would run alongside each industrial or commercial properties. While we other to West Ruislip. have kept the amount of land needed to a minimum, we expect that around 10 homes This would mean widening the existing railway would need to be demolished. These are corridor to accommodate the two high speed scattered along this section of the route. tracks, which – from Northolt Junction Additionally, a number of properties could be westwards – would lie on the north-eastern at risk of having some land taken, generally edge of the existing railway. where gardens back onto the line although it The route would pass to the north of West may prove that many of these may not be Ruislip station and would pass under Ickenham affected after all. Road. It would then pass through the southern If a decision is taken to go ahead with the high edge of Ruislip Golf Course crossing the River speed line, we will carry out more detailed Pinn and Breakspear Road South on a new design of the route, including considering the bridge, before passing westwards into a cutting.
    [Show full text]
  • UNDERGROUND DIARY JANUARY 2018 with Monday 1 January Already Covered in the Previous Issue, We Begin with Tuesday 2 January
    UNDERGROUND DIARY JANUARY 2018 With Monday 1 January already covered in the previous issue, we begin with Tuesday 2 January. At 23.35 the Bakerloo Line was suspended north of Queen’s Park because of items blown onto the track by the high winds south of Kensal Green – a metal obstruction and a tarpaulin under a southbound train. The service remained suspended until the end of traffic. A loss of all point indications in Morden Depot from 22.10 initially resulted in a 35-minute suspension south of Tooting Broadway, with delays continuing until the end of traffic following points being secured and restricted access to the depot, the last being 30 minutes late stabling, with several trains stabled elsewhere. The strong winds continued early on Wednesday 3 January. A tree blown onto the track from a private property on the approach to Ickenham was struck by the first eastbound Metropolitan Line train, suspending services on the Uxbridge line. The first eastbound Piccadilly Line train from Uxbridge, which follows the first Metropolitan Line train, was stalled to the rear until 06.20. Once cleared, services resumed at 06.55. The train was damaged in the incident but not seriously enough to prevent it being worked in service to Harrow, where it was detrained and worked empty to Neasden Depot. In the meanwhile, nine Northern Line trains were cancelled from Morden Depot because of stock imbalance (q.v.). An air burst on a southbound train at Kenton at 23.35 suspended the Bakerloo Line north of Stonebridge Park until the end of traffic.
    [Show full text]
  • Retro Underground: the Seventies to the Noughties – 3
    RETRO UNDERGROUND: THE SEVENTIES TO THE NOUGHTIES – 3. OTHER EVENTS by Tony Morgan My earliest memories of the Underground are during the Second World War travelling from Kingsbury on the Bakerloo Line into London and sometimes on to Kent on the Southern Railway to visit relations. In 1968, after ten years of driving to North Acton, I started commuting in to Great Portland Street. While I was there the second section of the Victoria Line opened as far as Warren Street. One lunchtime I decided to have a quick trip on it. The 1967 Stock train came in to reverse back. The Train Operator was standing in the cab with his back to the direction of travel as the ATO stopped the train. Maybe this was being done to build confidence in the new control system. Travelling home one day from Great Portland Street I saw the latest LT Magazine on display in the ticket office. I then started buying it on a regular basis. The front cover of that first edition had a photograph of the C69 Stock about to be introduced on the Circle Line on it. From that magazine I found out about ‘The Last Drop’ event at Neasden Depot, on Sunday 6 June 1971 advertised, which celebrated the end of use of steam locomotives for engineers’ operations. There I joined the Society because of their Sales Stand. This was my first organised event. At this event all three remaining locomotives were in steam. L94 hauled a rake of engineers’ vehicles from the City and pulled into one of two Klondyke Sidings in Neasden depot.
    [Show full text]
  • River Pinn to Breakspear Road
    London West Midlands HS2 Hillingdon Traffic and Construction Impacts Contents Page number 1 Executive summary ................................................................................................. 1 2 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 2 2.1 General .................................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Traffic Flows ............................................................................................................ 3 2.3 Sustainable Placement ............................................................................................ 3 3 Options to be carried forward and to be considered by the Promoter for inclusion within contractual documentation ................................................................................. 5 3.1 Re-use of excavated material from Copthall Cutting to construct Harvil Road Embankments .................................................................................................................... 5 3.2 Construction of bridge structures instead of railway embankments – River Pinn to Breakspear Road ............................................................................................................ 9 3.3 Use of excavated material for interval embankment between HS2 and Chiltern Lines 19 3.4 Commence importation of material earlier in the programme ........................... 21 3.5 Retention of Railway ‘Up-Sidings’ at
    [Show full text]
  • West Ruislip Station – Zone 6 I Onward Travel Information Local Area Map Bus Map
    West Ruislip Station – Zone 6 i Onward Travel Information Local Area Map Bus Map 39 O N E AT S 17 R ACRE 56 C St. Martin’s 15 O L D P R I O R Y H SOUTHCOTE RISE 444 10 A Church R 50 47 D C 35 L H O Southcote 12 S I E E Clinic G U n 31 S n A K i N N E O H E E P S L A T H V r A R P A S H S e iv T 76 48 8 T R S R R H E 28 U A 1 D E 3 36 5 A 9 H O T R H R E N N O F A E I M 1 T L E 25 20 G L E 53 D A N 24 L R L 80 I 19 I L M S H A N O E R R O A D E 25 U S 19 N E H 20 O S E C L A E V 33 G R A TA 9 O T P F C H I S E FIELD CLOSE L 3 C D W L R 60 A 3 A Y U River Pinn N H Y A E C W 2 D L E I 96 F A D R O 12 16 28 D ’ S 27 A R 11 17 D W G E K I N Ruislip Heathfield Rise/Glenhurst Avenue 33 71 34 F I E R D ’ S R O A D L D N G E D WA W K I U10 AY E E 21 35 S 45 N I 15 A R Heathfield Rise Woodville Gardens L L King Edwards L Hill Lane L I L H 31 Medical Centre I 48 H Field Way E Y U A W H I L L R I S E N S 2 H ’ Ruislip E R C Westcote Rise Orchard Close V 15 A O N A M 1 Golf Course H C R 20 Manor Road U 15 H Southcote Rise 120 20 C Sharps Lane D A S 1 H O Sharps Lane Neats Acre Ruislip A R Ruislip R P Methodist S M 87 Golf Course A L H Church Ruislip A E N N I CK 33 Golf Course E 36 Ruislip High Street/The Oaks The Orchard, Premier Inn Ruislip Ruislip High Street/Midcroft The yellow tinted area includes every S H D bus stop up to one-and-a-half miles A A Ruislip High Street/Brickwall Lane R RO Ruislip P M Ruislip 44 from West Ruislip.
    [Show full text]
  • Jubilee Drive 25
    25 JUBILEE DRIVE RUISLIP, GREATER LONDON, HA4 BUYERS BOOKLET PREPARED BY: 4 Bedrooms 2 Bathrooms Located on this quiet residential street in South Ruislip is this semi-detached home is perfect for the growing family. The house consists of a large, recently refurbished reception room, fitted kitchen and spacious bedrooms with plenty of storage space. Further benefits include a large driveway for multiple cars, a rear annexe currently being used for storage and direct access to Deane Park. South Ruislip is located in West London, part of the London borough of Hillingdon. The area is famous for its connections with the Royal Air Force and United States Air Force dating back to the First World War. Home to the oldest RAF base, RAF Northolt has been at the forefront of RAF operations up to the present day and a well-known landmark to local residents. Most notable of these was the Polish Fighter Squadrons based at RAF Northolt during the Second World War, which later lead to the construction of the Polish War Memorial next to the A40 to commemorate personnel who served at the base during the War. The Location Station South Ruislip Station (approx 0.5 miles) Primary School Deanesfield Primary School (approx 0.1 miles) Secondary School Queensmead School (approx 0.2 miles) Motorways M25 (approx 8.6 miles) Supermarket Waitrose (approx 2.5 miles) Gym Anytime fitness (approx 2.0 miles) Nearest outdoor space Deane Park (approx 0.4 miles) Key Facts Tenure Freehold Council Tax Band E Local Authority London Borough of Hillingdon Recently Rented £1,850 pcm Exeter Road, Harrow, Middlesex HA2 £1,900 pcm Somervell Road, Harrow HA2 £2,000 pcm Eastern Avenue, Pinner HA5 Our Estimation £1,850 - £1,900 pcm YOUR PROPERTY AGENT If you'd like to make an offer, or would like to leave some feedback or further questions, feel free to contact Oliver Ashton on the following: [email protected] 07941 499464 01895 527 116 Or scan the code below using your phone camera to start an instant chat via Whatsapp .
    [Show full text]
  • HS2 London to the West Midlands Appraisal of Sustainability
    HS2 London to the West Midlands Appraisal of Sustainability Main Report Volume 1 A Report for HS2 Ltd February 2011 HS2 London to the West Midlands: Appraisal of Sustainability Main Report Volume 1 HS2 London to the West Midlands Appraisal of Sustainability Main Report Volume 1 A Report for HS2 Ltd 55 Victoria Street London SW1H 0EU T 0207 944 4908 [email protected] Principal author Nick Giesler Key contributors Andrew Bryant, Andrew Mayes, Amanda Pownall, Sheenagh Mann, Sam Turner, Tony Selwyn, Yaser Ali Technical contributors Carbon and climate Matt Ireland, Tony Selwyn, Andrew Bryant, Water Environment Landscape & townscape Gillespies, Nick Giesler Cultural heritage Cotswold Archaeology Biodiversity Ecology Consultancy Ltd, Nick Giesler Water and flood risk Water Environment, Andrew Bryant Air quality John Rowland, Enan Keogh Noise and vibration John Fisk, Sasha Villa, Mark Southwood, Rob Adnitt Community integrity and accessibility Vicky Ward, Sheenagh Mann Equality Vicky Ward, Future Inclusion Health and well-being Institute for Occupational Medicine, Sheenagh Mann Socio-economics Derval Cummings, Stuart McCully, Colin Buchanan (consultants) Resources and consumption Andrew Mayes, Tony Selwyn, Sam Turner, Andrew Bryant Reviewers Mark Southwood, Stuart McCully, Roger Cooper This report was commissioned by, and prepared for HS2 Ltd and the Department for Transport (DfT) by Booz & Co. (UK) Ltd (www.booz.com) and Temple Group Ltd (www.templegroup.co.uk) ('The Consultant'). The findings and conclusions set forth in this report represent the best professional judgment of the Consultant based on information made available to it. The Consultant has relied on, and not independently verified, data provided to it by such sources and on secondary sources of information cited in the report.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 2 Appendix
    Appendix 2 IN PARLIAMENT HOUSE OF COMMONS SESSION 2013—14 HIGH SPEED RAIL (LONDON — WEST MIDLANDS) BILL Against—on Merits — Praying to be heard by Counsel, S.c. To the Honourabia the Commons of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland in Parliamont assembled. THE HUMBLE PETITION of TRANSPORT for LONDON SHEWETH as follows: your 1. A Bill (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Bill) has been introduced and Is now pending in Honourable House intituled “A bill to make provision for a railway between Euston in London and a junction with the West Coast Main Line at Handsacre in Staffordshire, with a spur from Old Oak Common in the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham to a junction with the Channel Tunnel Rail Link at York Way in the London Borough of lslington and a spur from Water Orton in Warwickshire to Curzon Street in Birmingham; and for connected purposes”. “the 2, The Bill is presented by Mr Secretary McLoughlin (referred to in thIs Petition as Promoter), supported by The Prime Minister, The Deputy Prime Minister, Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, Secretary Theresa May, Secretary Vince Cable, Secretary lain Duncan Smith, Secretary Eric Pickles, Secretary Owen Paterson, Secretary Edward Davey and Mr Robert Goodwill. CLAUSES OF THE BILL 16 make provision for the 3. Clauses 1 to 23 of the Bill together with Schedules 1 to construction and maintenance of the proposed works including the ‘Scheduled Works’ set to out in Schedule I (references in (his Petition to ‘Scheduled Work No.” are references those proposed works contained in Schedule 1).
    [Show full text]