Bernard Shaw and His Contemporaries

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bernard Shaw and His Contemporaries Bernard Shaw and His Contemporaries Series Editors Nelson O’Ceallaigh Ritschel Massachusetts Maritime Academy Pocasset, MA, USA Peter Gahan Independent Scholar Los Angeles, CA, USA The series Bernard Shaw and His Contemporaries presents the best and most up-to-date research on Shaw and his contemporaries in a diverse range of cultural contexts. Volumes in the series will further the academic understanding of Bernard Shaw and those who worked with him, or in reaction against him, during his long career from the 1880s to 1950 as a leading writer in Britain and Ireland, and with a wide European and American following. Shaw defned the modern literary theatre in the wake of Ibsen as a vehicle for social change, while authoring a dramatic canon to rival Shakespeare’s. His careers as critic, essayist, playwright, journalist, lecturer, socialist, feminist, and pamphleteer, both helped to shape the modern world as well as pointed the way towards modernism. No one engaged with his contemporaries more than Shaw, whether as controversialist, or in his support of other, often younger writers. In many respects, therefore, the series as it develops will offer a survey of the rise of the modern at the beginning of the twentieth century and the subsequent varied cultural movements covered by the term modernism that arose in the wake of World War 1. More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/14785 Joan Templeton Shaw’s Ibsen A Re-Appraisal Joan Templeton New York, NY, USA Bernard Shaw and His Contemporaries ISBN 978-1-137-54341-7 ISBN 978-1-137-54044-7 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54044-7 Library of Congress Control Number: 2017944577 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifcally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microflms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specifc statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affliations. Cover credit: Age fotostock/Alamy Stock Photo Printed on acid-free paper This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by Springer Nature The registered company is Nature America Inc. The registered company address is: 1 New York Plaza, New York, NY 10004, U.S.A. For Eric Bentley, The Mentor of Us All PREFACE The Quintessence of Ibsenism is perhaps the most famous book ever written by one author about another. Published in 1891 and revised and enlarged in 1913, it has been reprinted over and over and is regarded as a classic. But the book’s value is usually considered to lie less in what it reveals about its subject—Henrik Ibsen—than about its author—Bernard Shaw. For many readers, this is not much of a detriment. Shaw’s latest British biographer, Michael Holroyd, fnds that the joy of reading the Quintessence “is that of feeling Shaw’s agile and ingenious mind working with such vitality on material so sympathetic to him.” Although Shaw’s conversion of Ibsen “into a wholesale warrior does involve distortions to some of the plays,” Holroyd notes, Shaw’s purpose, after all, was to present his own “credentials as a man who was carrying on Ibsen’s busi- ness of ‘changing the mind of Europe’” (H 1:199). The Quintessence is considered to be the most important of Shaw’s nondramatic works for explaining his view of the world and a “blueprint,” in Christopher Innes’s term, for understanding his plays.1 In a recent statement on the book’s usefulness, Matthew Yde notes that the Quintessence “has usually been understood as a good indicator of Shaw’s own thinking, rather than a reli- able guide to understanding Ibsen’s dramaturgical strategy and philoso- phy of life; the quintessence of Shavianism rather than the quintessence of Ibsenism.”2 Eric Bentley was blunter; although he appreciated Shaw’s understanding of Ibsen, nevertheless, in his classic Bernard Shaw (1947), he directed readers of the Quintessence to substitute the word “Shaw” for the word “Ibsen” throughout.3 Blunter still was Charles Carpenter, vii viii PREFACE over twenty years later, who noted: “Despite its subject (and its value as an analysis of Ibsen), the book is still an uncamoufaged piece of Shavian propaganda.”4 A considerably more critical view of Quintessence is that whatever it tells us about Shaw, it is a seriously misleading book about Ibsen. Shortly after Shaw read a frst version—a lecture to the Fabian Society—in 1890, he was accused of transforming Ibsen into a socialist like himself. This false charge, which still lingers, is the crudest version of the popu- lar notion that Shaw wrongly regarded Ibsen as a reformer rather than an artist. A month after the Quintessence appeared, Shaw’s great friend William Archer, Ibsen’s devoted champion in England, published what was essentially a review of the book, “The Quintessence of Ibsenism: An Open Letter to George Bernard Shaw.” In it, he noted that Shaw’s argu- ment would “strengthen the predisposition . to regard Ibsen, not as a poet, but as the showman of a moral wax-work.” He noted, how- ever, that this “cannot be helped” because “it is a drawback inseparable from expository criticism” (A 31). By 1905, fourteen years later, Ibsen, now established as a great dramatist, had been the subject of a number of books in several languages that heralded his plays as arguments for women’s rights and other causes. Greatly irritated, Archer took it upon himself to respond in a lengthy essay, “Henrik Ibsen: Philosopher or Poet?,” in which he vehemently denounced the irksome critics who read Ibsen as “primarily a thinker, and only in the second place a poet”; he briefy named “Mr. Bernard Shaw’s brilliant little study, The Quintessence of Ibsenism” as “the type of this method of criticism” (A 81). Other critics, who found the Quintessence less than “brilliant,” blamed Shaw outright for Ibsen’s reputation as a writer of social protest. In the same year as Archer’s essay, 1905, the American critic James Huneker pub- lished his landmark survey of early modern drama, Iconoclasts: A Book of Dramatists, in which he claimed that in the Quintessence, Shaw had transformed Ibsen into “a magnifed image” of himself, “dropping ideas from on high with Olympian indifference,” with the result that “we are never shown Ibsen the artist, but always the social reformer with an awful frown.”5 As Shaw became famous as a dramatist in the frst decade of the twentieth century, his plays infuenced his reputation as a critic, and he was accused of being a didactic writer incapable of understanding the art- ist Ibsen, and even, in one well-known instance, of having been Ibsen’s “butcher.”6 By the 1930s, George Orwell could remark in passing in a PREFACE ix letter to a friend that Shaw “had slandered Ibsen in a way that must make poor old I[bsen] turn in his grave” (W 3), and Edmund Wilson, in The Triple Thinkers (1938), declared that Shaw, in turning Ibsen into a social reformer, creates “a false impression” and “seriously misrepresents him.”7 In the 1940s and 1950s, Shaw became a whipping boy of the New Critics as a foremost example of the unpoetic soul. The movement’s most famous arbiter of taste, T. S. Eliot, famously and somewhat nastily attacked Shaw in his imaginary conversation, “A Dialogue on Dramatic Poetry,” in which “B,” one of the participants, explains that “Shaw was a poet—until he was born, and the poet in Shaw was stillborn. Shaw has a great deal of poetry but all stillborn; Shaw is dramatically pre- cocious and poetically less than immature.”8 Following Eliot, Raymond Williams took on the task of saving Ibsen from the offcially unpoetic Shaw in his infuential Drama from Ibsen to Eliot (1953). Explaining that his book is intended to be literary criticism in the manner of “Mr. Eliot,” Williams offers a “revaluation of Ibsen.”9 He seems almost to be holding his nose as he regrets that Ibsen’s mode was realism, “a tradition which was acutely inimical to art”; in spite of this impediment, however, Ibsen somehow managed to achieve “work as valid and as permanent as our century has” (97). But because of the pernicious infuence of The Quintessence of Ibsenism, which “has to do with Ibsen only in the sense that it seriously misrepresents him” (138), Ibsen has been mistaken for sixty years as a writer who focused on moral issues that were incidental to his art. For having committed this blunder, Williams believes, Shaw and the other “Ibsenites” deserve to be blamed as “the disintegrators of Ibsen” (43). Williams is especially indignant at what he claims is the Ibsenites’ dismissal of Ibsen’s last four plays, and he cites as proof the subtitle of Shaw’s essay on them in the Quintessence: “‘Down among the Dead Men,’ said Shaw, and Down, Down, Down was the estimate of the last plays as they appeared” (86).
Recommended publications
  • JM Coetzee and Mathematics Peter Johnston
    1 'Presences of the Infinite': J. M. Coetzee and Mathematics Peter Johnston PhD Royal Holloway University of London 2 Declaration of Authorship I, Peter Johnston, hereby declare that this thesis and the work presented in it is entirely my own. Where I have consulted the work of others, this is always clearly stated. Signed: Dated: 3 Abstract This thesis articulates the resonances between J. M. Coetzee's lifelong engagement with mathematics and his practice as a novelist, critic, and poet. Though the critical discourse surrounding Coetzee's literary work continues to flourish, and though the basic details of his background in mathematics are now widely acknowledged, his inheritance from that background has not yet been the subject of a comprehensive and mathematically- literate account. In providing such an account, I propose that these two strands of his intellectual trajectory not only developed in parallel, but together engendered several of the characteristic qualities of his finest work. The structure of the thesis is essentially thematic, but is also broadly chronological. Chapter 1 focuses on Coetzee's poetry, charting the increasing involvement of mathematical concepts and methods in his practice and poetics between 1958 and 1979. Chapter 2 situates his master's thesis alongside archival materials from the early stages of his academic career, and thus traces the development of his philosophical interest in the migration of quantificatory metaphors into other conceptual domains. Concentrating on his doctoral thesis and a series of contemporaneous reviews, essays, and lecture notes, Chapter 3 details the calculated ambivalence with which he therein articulates, adopts, and challenges various statistical methods designed to disclose objective truth.
    [Show full text]
  • The Armstrong Browning Library Newsletter God Is the Perfect Poet
    The Armstrong Browning Library Newsletter God is the perfect poet. – Paracelsus by Robert Browning NUMBER 51 SPRING/SUMMER 2007 WACO, TEXAS Ann Miller to be Honored at ABL For more than half a century, the find inspiration. She wrote to her sister late Professor Ann Vardaman Miller of spending most of the summer there was connected to Baylor’s English in the “monastery like an eagle’s nest Department—first as a student (she . in the midst of mountains, rocks, earned a B.A. in 1949, serving as an precipices, waterfalls, drifts of snow, assistant to Dr. A. J. Armstrong, and a and magnificent chestnut forests.” master’s in 1951) and eventually as a Master Teacher of English herself. So Getting to Vallombrosa was not it is fitting that a former student has easy. First, the Brownings had to stepped forward to provide a tribute obtain permission for the visit from to the legendary Miller in Armstrong the Archbishop of Florence and the Browning Library, the location of her Abbot-General. Then, the trip itself first campus office. was arduous—it involved sitting in a wine basket while being dragged up the An anonymous donor has begun the cliffs by oxen. At the top, the scenery process of dedicating a stained glass was all the Brownings had dreamed window in the Cox Reception Hall, on of, but disappointment awaited Barrett the ground floor of the library, to Miller. Browning. The monks of the monastery The Vallombrosa Window in ABL’s Cox Reception The hall is already home to five windows, could not be persuaded to allow a woman Hall will be dedicated to the late Ann Miller, a Baylor professor and former student of Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • George Bernard Shaw, the Fabian Society, and Reconstructionist Education Policy: the London School of Economics and Political Science
    George Bernard Shaw, the Fabian Society, and Reconstructionist Education Policy: the London School of Economics and Political Science Jim McKernan East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA “He who can does, He who cannot teaches” (G.B. Shaw) Introduction When four members of the Executive Committee of the newly founded Fabian Society 1 met at Sidney Webb’s summer house at Borough Farm, near Godalming, Surrey, on the morning of 4 August, 1894 there was exciting news. The four left-wing intellectual radicals present were: Beatrice and Sidney Webb, Graham Wallas, (of the London School Board) and George Bernard Shaw. Sidney told the breakfast group of a letter he had received the previous day from Henry Hunt Hutchinson, a Derby solicitor who left his estate, a sum of ten thousand pounds sterling, to be used by the Fabian Society for its purposes. It appears that Sidney Webb probably initiated the idea of a London Economics Research School, but had the sound practical support and advice of Shaw and later, the financial support of Shaw’s wife, Charlotte Frances Payne-Townshend, an Irishwoman from Derry, County Cork. This paper explores the social reconstructionist educational and social policies employed by both the Webbs and George Bernard Shaw in establishing the London School of Economics and Political Science as a force to research and solve fundamental social problems like poverty in the United Kingdom in the late Nineteenth Century. That schools might function as agencies for dealing with the reformation of socio-economic problems has been a prime tenet of reconstructionist educational theory . 2 Social reconstructionist thought as an educational policy emerged in the USA from the time of the Great Depression of the 1930’s until the Civil Rights period of the 1960’s and many see it as a pre-cursor to critical theory in education.
    [Show full text]
  • Coventry Patmore: Critic of Literature and Art Julitta Gaul Loyola University Chicago
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Master's Theses Theses and Dissertations 1941 Coventry Patmore: Critic of Literature and Art Julitta Gaul Loyola University Chicago Recommended Citation Gaul, Julitta, "Coventry Patmore: Critic of Literature and Art" (1941). Master's Theses. Paper 187. http://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/187 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1941 Julitta Gaul - COVENTRY PATMORE CRITIC OF LITERATURE AND ART BY SISTER JULITTA GAUL. S.C.C. A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF :MASTER OF ARTS I:N LOYOLA UNIVERSITY FEBRUARY 1941 ,...... PREFACE The past two decades have witnessed a revival of interest in Coventry Patmore, whom the world has come to know as 11 the poet of nuptial love." In 1921 Frederick Page collected and published a large uumber of Patmore's latest essays under the title of Courage~ Politics and other Essgys, while Osbert Burdett published a microscopic examination of the Patmorean theme under the title The Idea of Patmore. The numerous articles commemorating the centenary of Patmore's birth were followed in 1924 by a biography of his daughter Emily, a religious of the Holy Child Jesus, whose life is a kind of commentary on the odes of ~ Unknown ~· Frederick Page's study of Patmore's poetry appeared in 1933.
    [Show full text]
  • MISALLIANCE : Know-The-Show Guide
    The Shakespeare Theatre of New Jersey MISALLIANCE: Know-the-Show Guide Misalliance by George Bernard Shaw Know-the-Show Audience Guide researched and written by the Education Department of The Shakespeare Theatre of New Jersey Artwork: Scott McKowen The Shakespeare Theatre of New Jersey MISALLIANCE: Know-the-Show Guide In This Guide – MISALLIANCE: From the Director ............................................................................................. 2 – About George Bernard Shaw ..................................................................................................... 3 – MISALLIANCE: A Short Synopsis ............................................................................................... 4 – What is a Shavian Play? ............................................................................................................ 5 – Who’s Who in MISALLIANCE? .................................................................................................. 6 – Shaw on — .............................................................................................................................. 7 – Commentary and Criticism ....................................................................................................... 8 – In This Production .................................................................................................................... 9 – Explore Online ...................................................................................................................... 10 – Shaw: Selected
    [Show full text]
  • THE RED RECORD: TABULATED STATISTICS and ALLEGED CAUSES of LYNCHING in the UNITED STATES (1895) by Ida B
    THE RED RECORD: TABULATED STATISTICS AND ALLEGED CAUSES OF LYNCHING IN THE UNITED STATES (1895) By Ida B. Wells-Barnett PREFACE HON. FREDERICK DOUGLASS’S LETTER: DEAR MISS WELLS: Let me give you thanks for your faithful paper on the lynch abomination now generally practiced against colored people in the South. There has been no word equal to it in convincing power. I have spoken, but my word is feeble in comparison. You give us what you know and testify from actual knowledge. You have dealt with the facts with cool, painstaking fidelity, and left those naked and uncontradicted facts to speak for themselves. Brave woman! you have done your people and mine a service which can neither be weighed nor measured. If the American conscience were only half alive, if the American church and clergy were only half Christianized, if American moral sensibility were not hardened by persistent infliction of outrage and crime against colored people, a scream of horror, shame, and indignation would rise to Heaven wherever your pamphlet shall be read. But alas! even crime has power to reproduce itself and create conditions favorable to its own existence. It sometimes seems we are deserted by earth and Heaven--yet we must still think, speak and work, and trust in the power of a merciful God for final deliverance. Very truly and gratefully yours, FREDERICK DOUGLASS Cedar Hill, Anacostia, D.C. CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 The Case Stated 57 CHAPTER 2 Lynch-Law Statistics 65 CHAPTER 3 Lynching Imbeciles 73 CHAPTER 4 Lynching of Innocent Men 84 CHAPTER 5 Lynched for Anything
    [Show full text]
  • The Collective Unconscious in Eugene O`Neill`S Desire Under The
    Aleppo University Faculty of Arts and Humanities Department of English The Collective Unconscious in Eugene O`Neill`s Desire Under the Elms and Mourning Becomes Electra and George Bernard Shaw`s Pygmalion and Man and Superman: A Comparative Study By Diana Dasouki Supervised by Prof. Dr. Iman Lababidi A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts In English Literature 2018 i Dasouki Declaration I hereby certify that this work, "The Collective Unconscious in Eugene O`Neill`s Desire Under the Elms and Mourning Becomes Electra and George Bernard Shaw`s Pygmalion and Man and Superman: A Comparative Study", has neither been accepted for any degree, nor is it submitted to any other degrees. Date: / / 2018 Candidate Diana Dasouki ii Dasouki Testimony I testify that the described work in this dissertation is the result of a scientific research conducted by the candidate Diana Dasouki under the supervision of Prof. Dr. Iman Lababidi, professor doctor at the Department of English, Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Aleppo University. Any other references mentioned in this work are documented in the text of this dissertation. Date: / / 2018 Candidate Diana Dasouki iii Dasouki Abstract This dissertation explores the theory of the collective unconscious in Eugene O'Neill's Desire Under the Elms and Mourning Becomes Electra and George Bernard Shaw's Pygmalion and Man and Superman. The main objective is to study how the work of Jung has awakened interest in the unconscious and archetype psychology. The collective unconscious is a useful theory because studying literature, myth and religion through archetypes can reveal many deep and hidden meanings.
    [Show full text]
  • Ninth Grade English Survey of Literature - Honors
    Ninth Grade English Survey of Literature - Honors CONTENT/THEME SUGGESTED RESOURCES CORE GOALS/SKILLS ASSESSMENT George Orwell Recognize components, devices, examples Assessments may include but are not limited Animal Farm and purposes of satire to: Objective Tests Mark Twain Understand relationship with political and Puddin’head Wilson historical contexts Subjective Tests and Essay Short answer George Bernard Shaw Understand the content, both literal and Timed essay Arms and the Man inferential Take-home essay Define terminology and identify examples Writing will focus on synthesis of direct Saki Satire quotations and analysis of satire as it “The Interlopers” Utilize strategies for reading literature relates to historical context Academic Standards for Reading, Writing, Oral presentation Speaking, and Listening: 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.6 Collaborative or Individual projects Homer Identify epic conventions Assessments may include but are not limited The Odyssey to: Identify major themes of epics Objective Tests From Beowulf Identify the characteristics and qualities of Subjective Tests and Essay Edna St. Vincent Millay an epic hero Short answer “An Ancient Gesture” Timed essay Identify how the epic reflects the time period Take-home essay Margaret Atwood Research-based essay Epic “Siren Song” Define terminology and identify examples Writing will focus on synthesis of direct Constantine Cavafy Understand the content, both literal and quotations, analysis of epic convention, “Ithaca” inferential comparison and contrast of the two representative
    [Show full text]
  • Cary M. Mazer 8132 Cadwalader Ave. Elkins Park, PA 19027
    Cary M. Mazer 8132 Cadwalader Ave. Elkins Park, PA 19027 Phone and FAX: (215) 635-1365 [email protected] http://web.sas.upenn.edu/cmazer/ Education: PhD Columbia University 1980 Theatre MA Columbia University 1976 Theatre AB Princeton University 1974 English Academic Employment: Professor of Theatre Arts and English (with tenure), University of Pennsylvania, 2016- present. Associate Professor of Theatre Arts and English (with tenure), University of Pennsylvania, 2002-2016. Associate Professor of English (with tenure), University of Pennsylvania, 1987-2002. Assistant Professor of English, University of Pennsylvania, 1980-87. Lecturer in English, University of Pennsylvania, 1979-80. Preceptor in Theatre, Columbia University, summer 1979. Publications: Books: Double Shakespeares: Emotional-Realist Acting and Contemporary Performance (Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2015). Reviews: Katherine Steele Brokaw, Theatre Survey 57 (2016), 473-5; Russell Jackson, Shakespeare Survey 69 (2016), 462-3. Editor, volume 15 (William Poel, H. Granville Barker, Tyrone Guthrie, Sam Wanamaker) of Great Shakespeareans, general editors Peter Holland and Adrian Poole (London: Bloomsbury/Arden, 2013). Shakespeare Refashioned: Elizabethan Plays on Edwardian Stages (Ann Arbor: UMI Research Press, 1981). Reviews: Ralph Berry, Dalhousie Review 63 (1983): 526- 32; Richard Allen Cave. Theatre Notebook 37 (1983): 140-41. Plays: Dear Birthmother Letter Got Your Back Benefit Performance, or, The Other Jew. Swing Set. Mazer February 26, 2018 2 A Puppeteer with the Palsy Perform Scenes from Shakespeare, or, The Ghost in the Machine. Seven Lectures on Hamlet. Script-in-hand reading, Drake Theatre, Philadelphia, 2017. Shylock’s Beard. Winner of the Association for Theatre in Higher Education (ATHE) Award for Excellence in Playwriting, 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Italian Literature Should Follow and Should Precede Other and Parallel Histories
    I. i III 2.3 CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY C U rar,y Ubrary PQ4038 G°2l"l 8t8a iterature 1lwBiiMiiiiiiiifiiliiii ! 3 1924 oim 030 978 245 Date Due M#£ (£i* The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924030978245 Short Histories of the Literatures of the World: IV. Edited by Edmund Gosse Short Histories of the Literatures of the World Edited by EDMUND GOSSE Large Crown 8vOj cloth, 6s. each Volume ANCIENT GREEK LITERATURE By Prof. Gilbert Murray, M.A. FRENCH LITERATURE By Prof. Edward Dowden, D.C.L., LL.D. MODERN ENGLISH LITERATURE By the Editor ITALIAN LITERATURE By Richard Garnett, C.B., LL.D. SPANISH LITERATURE By J. Fitzmaurice-Kelly [Shortly JAPANESE LITERATURE By William George Aston, C.M.G. [Shortly MODERN SCANDINAVIAN LITERATURE By George Brandes SANSKRIT LITERATURE By Prof. A. A. Macdonell. HUNGARIAN LITERATURE By Dr. Zoltan Beothy AMERICAN LITERATURE By Professor Moses Coit Tyler GERMAN LITERATURE By Dr. C. H. Herford LATIN LITERATURE By Dr. A. W. Verrall Other volumes will follow LONDON: WILLIAM HEINEMANN \AU rights reserved] A .History of ITALIAN LITERATURE RICHARD GARNETT, C.B., LL.D. Xon&on WILLIAM HEINEMANN MDCCCXCVIII v y. 1 1- fc V- < V ml' 1 , x.?*a»/? Printed by Ballantyne, Hanson &* Co. At the Ballantyne Press *. # / ' ri PREFACE "I think," says Jowett, writing to John Addington Symonds (August 4, 1890), "that you are happy in having unlocked so much of Italian literature, certainly the greatest in the world after Greek, Latin, English.
    [Show full text]
  • Bradmore Lunches
    ABBOTT William Abbot of Bradmore received lease from Sir John Willughby 30.6.1543. Robert Abbot married Alice Smyth of Bunny at Bunny 5.10.1566. Henry Sacheverell of Ratcliffe on Soar, Geoffrey Whalley of Idersay Derbyshire, William Hydes of Ruddington, Robert Abbotte of Bradmore, John Scotte the elder, son and heir of late Henry Scotte of Bradmore, and John Scotte the younger, son and heir of Richard Scotte of Bradmore agree 7.1.1567 to levy fine of lands, tenements and hereditaments in Bradmore, Ruddington and Cortlingstocke to William Kinder and Richard Lane, all lands, tenements and hereditaments in Bradmore to the sole use of Geoffrey Walley, and in Ruddington and 1 cottage and land in Bradmore to the use of Robert Abbotte for life and after his death to Richard Hodge. Alice Abbott married Oliver Martin of Normanton at Bunny 1.7.1570. James Abbot of Bradmore 20.10.1573, counterpart lease from Frauncis Willughby Ann Abbott married Robert Dawson of Bunny at Bunny 25.10.1588. Robert Abbot, of Bradmore? married Dorothy Walley of Bradmore at Bunny 5.10.1589. Margery Abbott married Jarvis Hall/Hardall of Ruddington at Bunny 28.11.1596. William Abbot of Bradmore, husbandman, married Jane Barker of Bradmore, widow, at Bunny 27.1.1600, licence issued 19.1.1600. 13.1.1613 John Barker of Newark on Trent, innholder, sold to Sir George Parkyns of Bunny knight and his heirs 1 messuage or tenement in Bradmere now or late in the occupation of William Abbott and Jane his wife; John Barker and his wife Johane covenant to acknowledge a fine of the premises within 7 years.
    [Show full text]
  • George Bernard Shaw in Context Edited by Brad Kent Frontmatter More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-04745-7 - George Bernard Shaw in Context Edited by Brad Kent Frontmatter More information GEORGE BERNARD SHAW IN CONTEXT When Shaw died in 1950, the world lost one of its most well-known authors, a revolutionary who was as renowned for his personality as he was for his humour, humanity, and rebellious thinking. He remains a compelling figure who deserves attention not only for how influential he was in his time but also for how relevant he is to ours. This collection sets Shaw’s life and achievements in context, with forty-two chapters devoted to subjects that interested him and defined his work. Contributors explore a wide range of themes, moving from factors that were formative in Shaw’s life, to the artistic work that made him most famous and the institutions with which he worked, to the political and social issues that consumed much of his attention, and, finally, to his influence and reception. Presenting fresh material and arguments, this collection will point to new direc- tions of research for future scholars. brad kent is Associate Professor of British and Irish Literatures at Université Laval and was Visiting Professor at Trinity College Dublin in 2013–14. His recent publications include a critical edition of Shaw’s Mrs Warren’s Profession (2012), The Selected Essays of Sean O’Faolain (forthcoming), and essays in University of Toronto Quarterly, Modern Drama, ARIEL: A Review of International English Literatures, English Literature in Transition, Irish University Review, and The Oxford Handbook of Modern Irish Theatre. He is also the programme director of the Shaw Symposium, held annually at the Shaw Festival in Niagara-on-the-Lake, Canada.
    [Show full text]