DOCSLIB.ORG

Lecture Notes on Classical Mechanics for Physics 106Ab Sunil Golwala

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lecture Notes on Classical Mechanics for Physics 106Ab Sunil Golwala Lecture Notes on Classical Mechanics for Physics 106ab Sunil Golwala Revision Date: September 25, 2006 Introduction These notes were written during the Fall, 2004, and Winter, 2005, terms. They are indeed lecture notes – I literally lecture from these notes. They combine material from Hand and Finch (mostly), Thornton, and Goldstein, but cover the material in a different order than any one of these texts and deviate from them widely in some places and less so in others. The reader will no doubt ask the question I asked myself many times while writing these notes: why bother? There are a large number of mechanics textbooks available all covering this very standard material, complete with worked examples and end-of-chapter problems. I can only defend myself by saying that all teachers understand their material in a slightly different way and it is very difficult to teach from someone else’s point of view – it’s like walking in shoes that are two sizes wrong. It is inevitable that every teacher will want to present some of the material in a way that differs from the available texts. These notes simply put my particular presentation down on the page for your reference. These notes are not a substitute for a proper textbook; I have not provided nearly as many examples or illustrations, and have provided no exercises. They are a supplement. I suggest you skim them in parallel while reading one of the recommended texts for the course, focusing your attention on places where these notes deviate from the texts. ii Contents 1 Elementary Mechanics 1 1.1 Newtonian Mechanics ................................... 2 1.1.1 The equation of motion for a single particle ................... 2 1.1.2 Angular Motion .................................. 13 1.1.3 Energy and Work .................................. 16 1.2 Gravitation ......................................... 24 1.2.1 Gravitational Force ................................. 24 1.2.2 Gravitational Potential .............................. 26 1.3 Dynamics of Systems of Particles ............................. 32 1.3.1 Newtonian Mechanical Concepts for Systems of Particles ........... 32 1.3.2 Collisions of Particles ............................... 47 2 Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Dynamics 59 2.1 The Lagrangian Approach to Mechanics ......................... 60 2.1.1 Degrees of Freedom, Constraints, and Generalized Coordinates ........ 61 2.1.2 Virtual Displacement, Virtual Work, and Generalized Forces ......... 67 2.1.3 d’Alembert’s Principle and the Generalized Equation of Motion ........ 72 2.1.4 The Lagrangian and the Euler-Lagrange Equations ............... 76 2.1.5 The Hamiltonian .................................. 79 2.1.6 Cyclic Coordinates and Canonical Momenta ................... 80 2.1.7 Summary ...................................... 81 2.1.8 More examples ................................... 82 2.1.9 Special Nonconservative Cases .......................... 88 2.1.10 Symmetry Transformations, Conserved Quantities, Cyclic Coordinates and Noether’s Theorem ................................. 91 2.2 Variational Calculus and Dynamics ............................ 99 2.2.1 The Variational Calculus and the Euler Equation ................ 99 2.2.2 The Principle of Least Action and the Euler-Lagrange Equation ....... 104 2.2.3 Imposing Constraints in Variational Dynamics ................. 105 2.2.4 Incorporating Nonintegrable Nonholonomic Constraints in Variational Dy- namics ........................................ 115 2.3 Hamiltonian Dynamics ................................... 117 2.3.1 Legendre Transformations and Hamilton’s Equations of Motion ........ 117 2.3.2 Phase Space and Liouville’s Theorem ...................... 124 2.4 Topics in Theoretical Mechanics ............................. 131 2.4.1 Canonical Transformations and Generating Functions ............. 131 2.4.2 Symplectic Notation ................................ 140 iii CONTENTS 2.4.3 Poisson Brackets .................................. 142 2.4.4 Action-Angle Variables and Adiabatic Invariance ................ 145 2.4.5 The Hamilton-Jacobi Equation .......................... 151 3 Oscillations 165 3.1 The Simple Harmonic Oscillator ............................. 166 3.1.1 Equilibria and Oscillations ............................ 166 3.1.2 Solving the Simple Harmonic Oscillator ..................... 168 3.1.3 The Damped Simple Harmonic Oscillator .................... 169 3.1.4 The Driven Simple and Damped Harmonic Oscillator ............. 173 3.1.5 Behavior when Driven Near Resonance ...................... 178 3.2 Coupled Simple Harmonic Oscillators .......................... 182 3.2.1 The Coupled Pendulum Example ......................... 182 3.2.2 General Method of Solution ............................ 186 3.2.3 Examples and Applications ............................ 194 3.2.4 Degeneracy ..................................... 202 3.3 Waves ............................................ 205 3.3.1 The Loaded String ................................. 205 3.3.2 The Continuous String ............................... 209 3.3.3 The Wave Equation ................................ 212 3.3.4 Phase Velocity, Group Velocity, and Wave Packets ............... 219 4 Central Force Motion and Scattering 223 4.1 The Generic Central Force Problem ........................... 224 4.1.1 The Equation of Motion .............................. 224 4.1.2 Formal Implications of the Equations of Motion ................. 230 4.2 The Special Case of Gravity – The Kepler Problem ................... 233 4.2.1 The Shape of Solutions of the Kepler Problem ................. 233 4.2.2 Time Dependence of the Kepler Problem Solutions ............... 238 4.3 Scattering Cross Sections ................................. 242 4.3.1 Setting up the Problem .............................. 242 4.3.2 The Generic Cross Section ............................. 243 1 4.3.3 r Potentials ..................................... 245 5 Rotating Systems 247 5.1 The Mathematical Description of Rotations ....................... 248 5.1.1 Infinitesimal Rotations ............................... 248 5.1.2 Finite Rotations .................................. 250 5.1.3 Interpretation of Rotations ............................ 253 5.1.4 Scalars, Vectors, and Tensors ........................... 253 5.1.5 Comments on Lie Algebras and Lie Groups ................... 257 5.2 Dynamics in Rotating Coordinate Systems ........................ 260 5.2.1 Newton’s Second Law in Rotating Coordinate Systems ............. 260 5.2.2 Applications .................................... 269 5.2.3 Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Dynamics in Rotating Coordinate Systems ... 271 5.3 Rotational Dynamics of Rigid Bodies ........................... 273 5.3.1 Basic Formalism .................................. 273 5.3.2 Torque-Free Motion ................................ 287 iv CONTENTS 5.3.3 Motion under the Influence of External Torques ................. 303 6 Special Relativity 313 6.1 Special Relativity ...................................... 314 6.1.1 The Postulates ................................... 314 6.1.2 Transformation Laws ................................ 314 6.1.3 Mathematical Description of Lorentz Transformations ............. 323 6.1.4 Physical Implications ................................ 329 6.1.5 Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Dynamics in Relativity .............. 336 A Mathematical Appendix 337 A.1 Notational Conventions for Mathematical Symbols ................... 337 A.2 Coordinate Systems .................................... 338 A.3 Vector and Tensor Definitions and Algebraic Identities ................. 339 A.4 Vector Calculus ....................................... 344 A.5 Taylor Expansion ...................................... 345 A.6 Calculus of Variations ................................... 346 A.7 Legendre Transformations ................................. 346 B Summary of Physical Results 349 B.1 Elementary Mechanics ................................... 349 B.2 Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Dynamics ......................... 353 B.3 Oscillations ......................................... 362 B.4 Central Forces and Dynamics of Scattering ....................... 369 B.5 Rotating Systems ...................................... 374 B.6 Special Relativity ...................................... 379 v Chapter 1 Elementary Mechanics This chapter reviews material that was covered in your first-year mechanics course – Newtonian mechanics, elementary gravitation, and dynamics of systems of particles. None of this material should be surprising or new. Special emphasis is placed on those aspects that we will return to later in the course. If you feel less than fully comfortable with this material, please take the time to review it now, before we hit the interesting new stuff! The material in this section is largely from Thornton Chapters 2, 5, and 9. Small parts of it are covered in Hand and Finch Chapter 4, but they use the language of Lagrangian mechanics that you have not yet learned. Other references are provided in the notes. 1 CHAPTER 1. ELEMENTARY MECHANICS 1.1 Newtonian Mechanics References: • Thornton and Marion, Classical Dynamics of Particles and Systems, Sections 2.4, 2.5, and 2.6 • Goldstein, Classical Mechanics, Sections 1.1 and 1.2 • Symon, Mechanics, Sections 1.7, 2.1-2.6, 3.1-3.9, and 3.11-3.12 • any first-year physics text Unlike some texts, we’re going to be very pragmatic and ignore niceties regarding the equivalence principle, the logical structure of Newton’s laws, etc. I will take it as given that we all have an intuitive understanding
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hamiltonian Chaos
    Hamiltonian Chaos Niraj Srivastava, Charles Kaufman, and Gerhard M¨uller Department of Physics, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881-0817. Cartesian coordinates, generalized coordinates, canonical coordinates, and, if you can solve the problem, action-angle coordinates. That is not a sentence, but it is classical mechanics in a nutshell. You did mechanics in Cartesian coordinates in introductory physics, probably learned generalized coordinates in your junior year, went on to graduate school to hear about canonical coordinates, and were shown how to solve a Hamiltonian problem by finding the action-angle coordinates. Perhaps you saw the action-angle coordinates exhibited for the harmonic oscillator, and were left with the impression that you (or somebody) could find them for any problem. Well, you now do not have to feel badly if you cannot find them. They probably do not exist! Laplace said, standing on Newton’s shoulders, “Tell me the force and where we are, and I will predict the future!” That claim translates into an important theorem about differential equations—the uniqueness of solutions for given ini- tial conditions. It turned out to be an elusive claim, but it was not until more than 150 years after Laplace that this elusiveness was fully appreciated. In fact, we are still in the process of learning to concede that the proven existence of a solution does not guarantee that we can actually determine that solution. In other words, deterministic time evolution does not guarantee pre- dictability. Deterministic unpredictability or deterministic randomness is the essence of chaos. Mechanical systems whose equations of motion show symp- toms of this disease are termed nonintegrable.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated List of References Tobias Keip, I7801986 Presentation Method: Poster
    Personal Inquiry – Annotated list of references Tobias Keip, i7801986 Presentation Method: Poster Poster Section 1: What is Chaos? In this section I am introducing the topic. I am describing different types of chaos and how individual perception affects our sense for chaos or chaotic systems. I am also going to define the terminology. I support my ideas with a lot of examples, like chaos in our daily life, then I am going to do a transition to simple mathematical chaotic systems. Larry Bradley. (2010). Chaos and Fractals. Available: www.stsci.edu/~lbradley/seminar/. Last accessed 13 May 2010. This website delivered me with a very good introduction into the topic as there are a lot of books and interesting web-pages in the “References”-Sektion. Gleick, James. Chaos: Making a New Science. Penguin Books, 1987. The book gave me a very general introduction into the topic. Harald Lesch. (2003-2007). alpha-Centauri . Available: www.br-online.de/br- alpha/alpha-centauri/alpha-centauri-harald-lesch-videothek-ID1207836664586.xml. Last accessed 13. May 2010. A web-page with German video-documentations delivered a lot of vivid examples about chaos for my poster. Poster Section 2: Laplace's Demon and the Butterfly Effect In this part I describe the idea of the so called Laplace's Demon and the theory of cause-and-effect chains. I work with a lot of examples, especially the famous weather forecast example. Also too I introduce the mathematical concept of a dynamic system. Jeremy S. Heyl (August 11, 2008). The Double Pendulum Fractal. British Columbia, Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Instructional Experiments on Nonlinear Dynamics & Chaos (And
    Bibliography of instructional experiments on nonlinear dynamics and chaos Page 1 of 20 Colorado Virtual Campus of Physics Mechanics & Nonlinear Dynamics Cluster Nonlinear Dynamics & Chaos Lab Instructional Experiments on Nonlinear Dynamics & Chaos (and some related theory papers) overviews of nonlinear & chaotic dynamics prototypical nonlinear equations and their simulation analysis of data from chaotic systems control of chaos fractals solitons chaos in Hamiltonian/nondissipative systems & Lagrangian chaos in fluid flow quantum chaos nonlinear oscillators, vibrations & strings chaotic electronic circuits coupled systems, mode interaction & synchronization bouncing ball, dripping faucet, kicked rotor & other discrete interval dynamics nonlinear dynamics of the pendulum inverted pendulum swinging Atwood's machine pumping a swing parametric instability instabilities, bifurcations & catastrophes chemical and biological oscillators & reaction/diffusions systems other pattern forming systems & self-organized criticality miscellaneous nonlinear & chaotic systems -overviews of nonlinear & chaotic dynamics To top? Briggs, K. (1987), "Simple experiments in chaotic dynamics," Am. J. Phys. 55 (12), 1083-9. Hilborn, R. C. (2004), "Sea gulls, butterflies, and grasshoppers: a brief history of the butterfly effect in nonlinear dynamics," Am. J. Phys. 72 (4), 425-7. Hilborn, R. C. and N. B. Tufillaro (1997), "Resource Letter: ND-1: nonlinear dynamics," Am. J. Phys. 65 (9), 822-34. Laws, P. W. (2004), "A unit on oscillations, determinism and chaos for introductory physics students," Am. J. Phys. 72 (4), 446-52. Sungar, N., J. P. Sharpe, M. J. Moelter, N. Fleishon, K. Morrison, J. McDill, and R. Schoonover (2001), "A laboratory-based nonlinear dynamics course for science and engineering students," Am. J. Phys. 69 (5), 591-7. http://carbon.cudenver.edu/~rtagg/CVCP/Ctr_dynamics/Lab_nonlinear_dyn/Bibex_nonline..
    [Show full text]
  • Chaos Theory and Robert Wilson: a Critical Analysis Of
    CHAOS THEORY AND ROBERT WILSON: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF WILSON’S VISUAL ARTS AND THEATRICAL PERFORMANCES A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Fine Arts Of Ohio University In partial fulfillment Of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Shahida Manzoor June 2003 © 2003 Shahida Manzoor All Rights Reserved This dissertation entitled CHAOS THEORY AND ROBERT WILSON: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF WILSON’S VISUAL ARTS AND THEATRICAL PERFORMANCES By Shahida Manzoor has been approved for for the School of Interdisciplinary Arts and the College of Fine Arts by Charles S. Buchanan Assistant Professor, School of Interdisciplinary Arts Raymond Tymas-Jones Dean, College of Fine Arts Manzoor, Shahida, Ph.D. June 2003. School of Interdisciplinary Arts Chaos Theory and Robert Wilson: A Critical Analysis of Wilson’s Visual Arts and Theatrical Performances (239) Director of Dissertation: Charles S. Buchanan This dissertation explores the formal elements of Robert Wilson’s art, with a focus on two in particular: time and space, through the methodology of Chaos Theory. Although this theory is widely practiced by physicists and mathematicians, it can be utilized with other disciplines, in this case visual arts and theater. By unfolding the complex layering of space and time in Wilson’s art, it is possible to see the hidden reality behind these artifacts. The study reveals that by applying this scientific method to the visual arts and theater, one can best understand the nonlinear and fragmented forms of Wilson's art. Moreover, the study demonstrates that time and space are Wilson's primary structuring tools and are bound together in a self-renewing process.
    [Show full text]
  • Moon-Earth-Sun: the Oldest Three-Body Problem
    Moon-Earth-Sun: The oldest three-body problem Martin C. Gutzwiller IBM Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598 The daily motion of the Moon through the sky has many unusual features that a careful observer can discover without the help of instruments. The three different frequencies for the three degrees of freedom have been known very accurately for 3000 years, and the geometric explanation of the Greek astronomers was basically correct. Whereas Kepler’s laws are sufficient for describing the motion of the planets around the Sun, even the most obvious facts about the lunar motion cannot be understood without the gravitational attraction of both the Earth and the Sun. Newton discussed this problem at great length, and with mixed success; it was the only testing ground for his Universal Gravitation. This background for today’s many-body theory is discussed in some detail because all the guiding principles for our understanding can be traced to the earliest developments of astronomy. They are the oldest results of scientific inquiry, and they were the first ones to be confirmed by the great physicist-mathematicians of the 18th century. By a variety of methods, Laplace was able to claim complete agreement of celestial mechanics with the astronomical observations. Lagrange initiated a new trend wherein the mathematical problems of mechanics could all be solved by the same uniform process; canonical transformations eventually won the field. They were used for the first time on a large scale by Delaunay to find the ultimate solution of the lunar problem by perturbing the solution of the two-body Earth-Moon problem.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 8 Nonlinear Systems
    Chapter 8 Nonlinear systems 8.1 Linearization, critical points, and equilibria Note: 1 lecture, §6.1–§6.2 in [EP], §9.2–§9.3 in [BD] Except for a few brief detours in chapter 1, we considered mostly linear equations. Linear equations suffice in many applications, but in reality most phenomena require nonlinear equations. Nonlinear equations, however, are notoriously more difficult to understand than linear ones, and many strange new phenomena appear when we allow our equations to be nonlinear. Not to worry, we did not waste all this time studying linear equations. Nonlinear equations can often be approximated by linear ones if we only need a solution “locally,” for example, only for a short period of time, or only for certain parameters. Understanding linear equations can also give us qualitative understanding about a more general nonlinear problem. The idea is similar to what you did in calculus in trying to approximate a function by a line with the right slope. In § 2.4 we looked at the pendulum of length L. The goal was to solve for the angle θ(t) as a function of the time t. The equation for the setup is the nonlinear equation L g θ�� + sinθ=0. θ L Instead of solving this equation, we solved the rather easier linear equation g θ�� + θ=0. L While the solution to the linear equation is not exactly what we were looking for, it is rather close to the original, as long as the angleθ is small and the time period involved is short. You might ask: Why don’t we just solve the nonlinear problem? Well, it might be very difficult, impractical, or impossible to solve analytically, depending on the equation in question.
    [Show full text]
  • Emergent Chaos in the Verge of Phase Transitions
    UNIVERSIDAD DE LOS ANDES BACHELOR THESIS Emergent chaos in the verge of phase transitions Author: Supervisor: Jerónimo VALENCIA Dr. Gabriel TÉLLEZ A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor in Physics in the Department of Physics January 14, 2019 iii Declaration of Authorship I, Jerónimo VALENCIA, declare that this thesis titled, “Emergent chaos in the verge of phase transitions” and the work presented in it are my own. I confirm that: • This work was done wholly or mainly while in candidature for a research degree at this University. • Where any part of this thesis has previously been submitted for a degree or any other qualification at this University or any other institution, this has been clearly stated. • Where I have consulted the published work of others, this is always clearly attributed. • Where I have quoted from the work of others, the source is always given. With the exception of such quotations, this thesis is entirely my own work. • I have acknowledged all main sources of help. • Where the thesis is based on work done by myself jointly with others, I have made clear exactly what was done by others and what I have con- tributed myself. Signed: Date: v “The fluttering of a butterfly’s wing in Rio de Janeiro, amplified by atmospheric currents, could cause a tornado in Texas two weeks later.” Edward Norton Lorenz “We avoid the gravest difficulties when, giving up the attempt to frame hypotheses con- cerning the constitution of matter, we pursue statistical inquiries as a branch of rational mechanics” Josiah Willard Gibbs vii UNIVERSIDAD DE LOS ANDES Abstract Faculty of Sciences Department of Physics Bachelor in Physics Emergent chaos in the verge of phase transitions by Jerónimo VALENCIA The description of phase transitions on different physical systems is usually done using Yang and Lee, 1952, theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Exercises Week 8
    M´etodosexp. ycomp. deBiof´ısica(ME) Exercisesweek8 Exercises week 8 December 14, 2017 Please submit your work after the Xmas break (name the script file as your name problems-week8.m) at the following e-mail address [email protected]. 1 Suggestions for a possible project The cycloidal pendulum (brachistochrone problem) A simple pendulum is not in general isochronous, i.e., the period of oscillations depends on their amplitude. However, if a simple pendulum is suspended from the cusp of an inverted cycloid, such that the “string” is constrained between the adjacent arcs of the cycloid, and the pendulum’s length is equal to that of half the arc length of the cycloid (i.e., twice the diameter of the generating circle), the bob of the pendulum also traces a cycloid path. Such a cycloidal pendulum is isochronous, regardless of amplitude. Study this problem and compare the numerical solutions of the equations of motion with the analytical ones. The double pendulum A double pendulum is a pendulum (point mass suspended from a string of negligible mass) with another pendulum attached to its end. Despite being a simple physical system, the dynamics of the double pendulum is rich and can exhibit chaotic behaviour and great sensitivity to initial conditions. The butterfly effect The butterfly effect in chaos theory refers to sensitive dependence on initial conditions that certain deterministic non-linear systems have. Here, a small change in one state of a deterministic non-linear system can result in large differences in a later state. In this project you can numerically simulate this effect by solving the Lorenz equations., i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Finite Precision on the Simulation of the Double Pendulum Rebecca Wild
    James Madison University JMU Scholarly Commons Senior Honors Projects, 2010-current Honors College Summer 2019 The effects of finite precision on the simulation of the double pendulum Rebecca Wild Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/honors201019 Part of the Engineering Commons, Non-linear Dynamics Commons, Numerical Analysis and Computation Commons, Numerical Analysis and Scientific omputC ing Commons, and the Other Computer Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Wild, Rebecca, "The effects of finite precision on the simulation of the double pendulum" (2019). Senior Honors Projects, 2010-current. 730. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/honors201019/730 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College at JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Honors Projects, 2010-current by an authorized administrator of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Effects of Finite Precision on the Simulation of the Double Pendulum _______________________ An Honors College Project Presented to the Faculty of the Undergraduate College of Integrated Science and Engineering James Madison University _______________________ by Rebecca Lynn Wild April 2019 Accepted by the faculty of the Department of Computer Science, James Madison University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Honors College. FACULTY COMMITTEE: HONORS COLLEGE APPROVAL: Project Advisor: Michael O.Lam, Ph.D. Bradley R. Newcomer, Ph.D. Assistant Professor, Computer Science Dean, Honors College Reader: Ramon A. Mata-Toledo, Ph.D. Professor, Computer Science Reader: James S. Sochacki, Ph.D. Professor, Mathematics PUBLIC PRESENTATION This work is accepted for presentation, in part or in full, at the Computer Science Department Research Seminar on April 19, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Stabilization of a Cart and Double-Pendulum System 1
    STABILIZATION OF A CART AND DOUBLE-PENDULUM SYSTEM DANIEL ALLEN LANGDON Abstract. This Master’s Plan B report for the University of Hawai‘i at M¯anoa is the result of Daniel Langdon’s examination of methods of modeling and stabilizing a cart and double-pendulum system against small disturbances. The Euler-Lagrange Equations, a fundamental result of the calculus of variations, combined with the Principle of Least Action and the Lagrange D’Alembert Principle are used to describe the equations of motion for a cart and double-pendulum system in terms of the kinetic and potential energy of the system, which is in turn described in terms of the positions and velocities of the cart and two pendulum bobs. Theorems from differential equations are combined with a linear approximation of the equations of motion and the notion of feedback to compute an algorithm for stabilization, whose action of stabilization against a sample small disturbance is demonstrated. 1. Introduction For my master’s research, I have explored the field of control theory by searching for controls that stabilize a cart and double-pendulum system in the up unstable equilibrium with a single control acting only on the cart. Stabilizing the cart and double-pendulum system is not the end-goal; the purpose of the system is to provide a tool for learning about control theory. Control theory is an important field in applied mathematics with applications in many fields including physics, economics, computer science, and artificial intelligence. For example, consider the problem of controlling the thrust of a rocket engine as it launches a satellite into orbit.
    [Show full text]
  • The Maths Behind Chaos Theory and Sudden Change
    9 OCTOBER 2018 Can Maths Predict the Future? The Maths Behind Chaos Theory and Sudden Change PROFESSOR CHRIS BUDD OBE 1. Introduction In this lecture we will address the fundamental question of Can we predict the future? Admittedly this is one of the most important questions we could ever ask. Whole industries (including for example gambling, and insurance), not to mention many major religions, owe their very existence in part to attempts to answer this very question. So, I ask again, is it possible for us to predict the future? Hands up for your thoughts on this. In one sense there is an easy to answer. For a human being it is very likely that for most practical purposes we can predict 0ne second into the future. Much of what we see around us doesn’t change much, if at all, over a period of one second. A computer model of the weather, or of the climate, or of a city, would have little difficultly predicting the behaviour over the next second with high accuracy. However, for a sub atomic particle one second is a very long time indeed over which a great deal can happen. Computer models of particles and molecules typically operate over very short time-scales and find it hard to predict for such a long time as a second. If I was to ask, can we predict what is going to happen in an hours’ time, again we could be pretty sure of the answer. I expect that those of you who are at this lecture will still (I hope) be here, and that the world hasn’t ended.
    [Show full text]
  • Flux-Based Statistical Prediction of Three-Body Outcomes
    Prepared for submission to JHEP Flux-based statistical prediction of three-body outcomes Barak Kol Racah Institute of Physics, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91904, Israel [email protected] Abstract: The gravitational three-body problem is a rich open problem, dating back to Newton. It serves as a prototypical example of a chaotic system and has numerous applications in astrophysics. Generically, the motion is non-integrable and susceptible to disintegration, and for negative total energy the decay outcome is a free body flying apart from a binary. Since Poincar´e,the problem is known to be chaotic and is believed to lack a general deterministic solution. Instead, decades ago a statistical solution was marked as a goal. Yet, despite considerable progress, all extant approaches display two flaws. First, probability was equated with phase space volume, thereby ignoring the fact that significant regions of phase space describe regular motion, including post-decay motion. Secondly and relatedly, an adjustable parameter, the strong interaction region, which is a sort of cutoff, was a central ingredient of the theory. This paper introduces remedies and presents for the first time a statistical prediction of decay rates, in addition to outcomes. Based on an analogy with a particle moving within a leaky container, the statistical distribution is presented in an exactly factorized form. One factor is the flux of phase-space volume, rather than the volume itself, and it is given in a cutoff-independent closed-form. The other factors are the chaotic absorptivity and the regularized phase space volume. The situation is analogous to Kirchhoff's law of thermal radiation, also known as greybody radiation.
    [Show full text]