DOCSLIB.ORG

Yearbook of the International Law Commission 1996

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Yearbook of the International Law Commission 1996 YEARBOOK OF THE INTERNATIONAL LAW COMMISSION LAW THE INTERNATIONAL YEARBOOK OF A/CN.4/SER.A/1996/Add.1 (Part 1) YEARBOOK OF THE INTERNATIONAL l LAW COMMISSION 1996 1996 Volume II Volume Volume II Part One l Part One Documents of the forty-eighth session United Nations publication ISBN 978-92-1-233306-9 Sales No. E.98.V.9 (Part 1) ISSN 0082-8289 UNITED NATIONS Printed at United Nations, Geneva–GE.07-60137–November 2008–2,175 UNITED NATIONS A/CN.4/SER.A/1996/Add.1 (Part 1) YEARBOOK OF THE INTERNATIONAL LAW COMMISSION 1996 Volume II0 Part One0 Documents of the forty-eighth session UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2008 NOTE Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. References to the Yearbook of the International Law Commission are abbreviated to Yearbook ..., followed by the year (for example, Yearbook ... 1995). The Yearbook for each session of the International Law Commission comprises two volumes: Volume I: summary records of the meetings of the session; Volume II (Part One): reports of special rapporteurs and other documents consid- ered during the session; Volume II (Part Two): report of the Commission to the General Assembly. All references to these works and quotations from them relate to the final printed texts of the volumes of the Yearbook issued as United Nations publications. * * * The reports of the special rapporteurs and other documents considered by the Com- mission during its forty-eighth session, which were originally issued in mimeographed form, are reproduced in the present volume, incorporating the corrigenda issued by the Secretariat and the editorial changes required for the presentation of the final text. A/CN.4/SER.A/1996/Add.l (Part 1) UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No.: E.98.V.9 (Part 1) ISBN 978-92-1-233306-9 ISSN 0082-8289 ii CONTENTS Page Abbreviations ...................................................................................................... iv Note concerning quotations ................................................................................ iv State responsibility (agenda item 2) Document A/CN.4/476 and Add.1. Eighth report on State responsibility, by Mr. Gaetano Arangio-Ruiz, Special Rapporteur ............................................. 1 Draft Code of Crimes against the Peace and Security of Mankind (agenda item 3) Document ILC(XLVIII)/DC/CRD.3. Document on crimes against the environ- ment, prepared by Mr. Christian Tomuschat, member of the Commission .... 15 International liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law (agenda item 4) Document A/CN.4/475 and Add.1. Twelfth report on international liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law, by Mr. Julio Barboza, Special Rapporteur .............................................. 29 The law and practice relating to reservations to treaties (agenda item 5) Document A/CN.4/477 and Add.1. Second report on reservations to treaties, by Mr. Alain Pellet, Special Rapporteur .............................................................. 37 Document A/CN.4/478. Annex I: Bibliography ................................................... 85 Annex II: Questionnaire on the topic of reservations to treaties addressed to States Members of the United Nations or of a specialized agency or parties to the ICJ Statute ............................................................................................. 97 Annex III: Questionnaire on the topic of reservations to treaties addressed to international organizations .............................................................................. 107 State succession and its impact on the nationality of natural and legal per- sons (agenda item 6) Document A/CN.4/474. Second report on State succession and its impact on the nationality of natural and legal persons, by Mr. Václav Mikulka, Special Rapporteur ....................................................................................................... 119 Checklist of documents of the forty-eighth session .................................... 153 iii ABBREVIATIONS CAHDI Ad Hoc Committee of Legal Advisers on Public International Law ECE Economic Commission for Europe FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency ICAO International Civil Aviation Organization ICJ International Court of Justice ILO International Labour Organization IMF International Monetary Fund IMO International Maritime Organization ITU International Telecommunication Union OAS Organization of American States OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development UNEP United Nations Environment Programme UNHCR Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees WHO World Health Organization WIPO World Intellectual Property Organization * * * Collected Courses … Collected Courses of The Hague Academy of International Law I.C.J. Reports ICJ, Reports of Judgments, Advisory Opinions and Orders ILM International Legal Materials ILR International Law Reports P.C.I.J., Series A PCIJ, Collection of Judgments (Nos. 1–24, up to and including 1930) Recueil des cours… Recueil des cours de l’Académie de droit international de La Haye UNRIAA United Nations, Reports of International Arbitral Awards * * * NOTE CONCERNING QUOTATIONS In quotations, words or passages in italics followed by an asterisk were not italicized in the original text. Unless otherwise indicated, quotations from works in languages other than English have been translated by the Secretariat. iv STATE RESPONSIBILITY [Agenda item 2] DOCUMENT A/CN.4/476 and Add.1* Eighth report on State responsibility, by Mr. Gaetano Arangio-Ruiz, Special Rapporteur [Original: English] [14 and 24 May 1996] CONTENTS Paragraphs Page INTRODUCT I ON ........................................................................................................................... 1 2 Chapter I. PROBLEMS RELATING TO THE REGIME OF INTERNATIONALLY WRONGFUL ACTS SINGLED OUT AS CRIMES IN ARTICLE 19 OF P ART ONE OF THE DRAFT ARTICLES ............................................... 2−46 2 A. The fate of draft article 19 of part one ........................................................................ 3−8 2 B. The special and additional substantive consequences of crimes ................................ 9−24 3 1. A general point .................................................................................................... 9−10 3 2. Draft article 16 as proposed ................................................................................ 11−17 3 3. Draft article 17 as proposed ................................................................................ 18−21 4 4. Draft article 18 as proposed ................................................................................ 22−24 4 C. The institutional aspects of the legal regime of crimes .............................................. 25−41 5 1. De lege lata objections ........................................................................................ 27−38 5 2. De lege ferenda objections .................................................................................. 39−41 6 D. Conclusions: draft article 4 as adopted by the Commission and draft article 20 as proposed by the Special Rapporteur in his seventh report ......................................... 42−46 7 II. OTHER ISSUES TO WHICH THE SP ECIAL RA pp ORTEUR DEEMS IT NECESSARY TO CALL THE ATTENTION OF THE COMMISSION IN VIEW OF THE COM P LETION OF THE FIRST READING OF THE DRAFT ARTICLES ............................................................................................................ 47−84 8 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 47 8 A. The role of fault in general and in connection with satisfaction ................................ 48−55 8 B. The dispute settlement provisions of parts two and three of the draft articles ........... 56−79 9 1. General ............................................................................................................... 56−60 9 2. Pre-countermeasure settlement obligations: article 12 of part two ..................... 61−68 10 3. Post-countermeasure dispute settlement obligations (part three) ........................ 69−73 11 4. Issues of interim protective measures ................................................................. 74−79 11 C. Proportionality ............................................................................................................ 80−84 12 * Incorporating document A/CN.4/476/Corr.1. 1 2 Documents of the forty-eighth session Introduction 1. The object of the present report is to address a few is- parts two and three of the draft. The main issues among sues to which the Special Rapporteur hopes the Commis- these relate to matters that the Commission will consider sion will give some further thought before completing, as in the course of its forty-eighth session—in plenary, in the planned, the first reading of the draft articles.1 The issues Drafting Committee, or in both—with regard to the legal in question, some of which are interrelated, concern only regime of the consequences of the internationally wrong- ful acts singled out as crimes in article 19 of part one of 1 For the text of parts one to three of the draft articles, see Year- the draft articles as adopted on
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sir Elihu Lauterpacht QC Issue : Vol
    Transnational Dispute Management www.transnational-dispute-management.com ISSN : 1875-4120 TDM 3 (2018) - Sir Elihu Lauterpacht QC Issue : Vol. 15, issue 3 Published : April 2018 Introduction Professor Maurice Mendelson QC 2 Sir Elihu Lauterpacht QC and the Settlement of Maritime Disputes Judge D.H. Anderson CMG 5 Sir Elihu Lauterpacht and the Lauterpacht Centre for International Law at the University of Cambridge Professor Eyal Benvenisti, Dr. Sarah Nouwen and Dr. Michael Waibel 8 Elihu Lauterpacht, LCIL and the Lauterpacht Tradition Sir Elihu Lauterpacht QC Judge James Crawford AC 11 (1928 - 2017) Board Member in Memoriam Influencing International Law without Dispute Professor Robert McCorquodale 19 Sir Elihu Lauterpacht: a Celebration of his Life and Work - Some Remarks on Eli's Academic Writings on International Litigation Professor Iain Scobbie 21 Sir Elihu Lauterpacht QC: the Practitioner as Publicist Sir Michael Wood QC 25 © Copyright TDM 2018 TDM Cover v6.1 Introduction Professor Maurice Mendelson QC* ELIHU LAUTERPACHT was a valued member of the Editorial Board of TDM1, and we decided that it would be appropriate to mark his passing in 2017 with a few reminiscences by some of those who knew and admired him. I would like to express my sincere thanks to those who took the time out of their busy schedules to write the tributes that follow. *** Elihu (known to all as Eli) was born in London in 1928, the only child of Rachel (née Steinberg) and Hersch Lauterpacht, Jewish immigrants from central and Eastern Europe. Despite his foreign origins, Hersch was to become, not only Whewell Professor of International Law at Cambridge University and a knight of the realm, but one of the leading international lawyers of his generation, and certainly one of the most imaginative and most admired.
    [Show full text]
  • Elihu Lauterpacht, LCIL and the Lauterpacht Tradition James
    Elihu Lauterpacht, LCIL and the Lauterpacht Tradition James Crawford AC* My focus here is Eli’s relation to what is still thought of as the Lauterpacht tradition of thinking about and doing international law, a tradition largely identified with his father, Hersch Lauterpacht, scholar and judge – but which Eli contributed to perpetuating and consolidating.1 Precisely because Hersch’s contribution is even now so well-known, nearly 60 years after his death, it seems appropriate to focus first on Eli’s own, distinct, career. This one can in part recall by listing the various things he started or continued and which are in many cases now institutions, which embody new ideas or which at least evoke strong memories. This account is of course merely indicative. First there was judging and arbitrating. He was once appointed an ad hoc judge in a case before the International Court, in the early stages of Bosnian Genocide. His separate opinion in that case (in some respects a dissenting opinion) is notable for its analysis of the role of the ad hoc judge. He said… consistently with the duty of impartiality by which the ad hoc judge is bound, there is still something specific that distinguishes his role. He has, I believe, the special obligation to endeavour to ensure that, so far as is reasonable, every relevant argument in favour of the party that has appointed him has been fully appreciated in the course of collegial consideration and, ultimately, is reflected – though not necessarily accepted – in any separate or dissenting opinion…2 * © James Crawford, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights and Genocide: the Work of Lauterpacht and Lemkin in Modern International Law
    The European Journal of International Law Vol. 20 no. 4 © EJIL 2010; all rights reserved .......................................................................................... Human Rights and Genocide: The Work of Lauterpacht and Lemkin in Modern International Law Ana Filipa Vrdoljak* Abstract 2008 marked the sixtieth anniversary of the adoption of the Genocide Convention and Uni­ versal Declaration of Human Rights by the UN General Assembly. These two instruments adopted and proclaimed by the then newly formed world body on successive days, 9 and 10 December 1948 respectively, represent two sides of one coin. Born of the horrors of the 1930s and 1940s, the United Nations Charter speaks of human rights and to the import­ ance of the rule of law. The Genocide Convention and UDHR are integral to the pursuit of these aims. The work of two international lawyers, Hersch Lauterpacht and Raphael Lemkin, whose personal and familial histories traverse the tragedies of 20th century Europe, was instrumental in the realization of these twin efforts. This article examines their respective contributions to contemporary international law by concentrating on their European experi­ ence from their youth in Central Europe and the early days of the League of Nations to their mature work up to and including the Nuremberg Judgment. Important events – whether serious, happy or unfortunate – do not change a man’s soul, they merely bring it into relief, just as a strong gust of wind reveals the true shape of a tree when it blows off all its leaves. Such events highlight what is hidden in the shadows; they nudge the spirit towards a place where it can flourish.1 1 Introduction To say that a single individual’s work has profoundly shaped a discipline such as inter- national law is a statement that is rarely made.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses Sir Hersch Lauterpacht as a prototype of post-war modern international legal thought: analysis of international legalism in the universalisation process of the European law of nations Kita, Yasuo How to cite: Kita, Yasuo (2003) Sir Hersch Lauterpacht as a prototype of post-war modern international legal thought: analysis of international legalism in the universalisation process of the European law of nations, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/3656/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 SIR HERSCH LAUTERPACHT AS A PROTOTYPE OF POST-WAR MODERN INTERNATIONAL LEGAL THOUGHT: ANALYSIS OF INTERNATIONAL LEGALISM IN THE UNIVERSALISATION PROCESS OF THE EUROPEAN LAW OF NATIONS KITA, YASUO LL.B. (WASEDA), M.A. (KYOlD) DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY LAW DEPARTMENT UNIVERSITY OF DURHAM A copyright of this thesis rests with the author.
    [Show full text]
  • A Theory of Crimes Against Humanity
    Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2004 A Theory of Crimes Against Humanity David Luban Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/146 29 Yale J. Int'l L. 85-167 (2004) This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub Part of the Human Rights Law Commons GEORGETOWN LAW Faculty Publications January 2010 A Theory of Crimes Against Humanity 29 Yale J. Int’l L. 85-167 (2004) David Luban Professor of Law Georgetown University Law Center [email protected] This paper can be downloaded without charge from: Scholarly Commons: http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/146/ Posted with permission of the author A Theory of Crimes Against Humanity David Luban t I. INTRODUCTION: CRIMES AGAINST HUMANNESS AND CRIMES AGAINST HUMANKIND ................. 86 II. CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY: THE DISTINCTIVE LEGAL FEATURES ............................................. 93 III. CRIMES AGAINST HUMANNESS AND THE POLITICAL ANIMAL .................................................... 109 A. Aspects ofHumanity ...................... , ................................................................................ 109 B. The Political Animal ....................................................................................................... III C. "Unsociable Sociability" Versus
    [Show full text]
  • History of Honors Conferred by the American Society of International
    AMERICAN SOCIETY OF INTERNATIONAL LAW Regulation on the Honors Committee The Honors Committee shall make recommendations to the Executive Council with respect to the Society’s three annual awards: the Manley O. Hudson Medal, given to a distinguished person of American or other nationality for outstanding contributions to scholarship and achievement in international law; the Goler T. Butcher Medal, given to a distinguished person of American or other nationality for outstanding contributions to the development or effective realization of international human rights law; and the Honorary Member Award, given to a person of American or other nationality who has rendered distinguished contributions or service in the field of international law. (Note: Until 2015, the award was permitted to be given only to a non-American) RECIPIENTS OF THE MANLEY O. HUDSON MEDAL (†Deceased) 1956 Manley O. Hudson† 1989 Not awarded 1957 Not awarded 1990 Not awarded 1958 Not awarded 1991 Not awarded 1959 Lord McNair† 1992 Not awarded 1960 Not awarded 1993 Sir Robert Y. Jennings† 1961 Not awarded 1994 Not awarded 1962 Not awarded 1995 Louis Henkin† 1963 Not awarded 1996 Louis B. Sohn† 1964 Philip C. Jessup† 1997 John R. Stevenson† 1965 Not awarded 1998 Rosalyn Higgins 1966 Charles De Visscher† 1999 Shabtai Rosenne† 1967 Not awarded 2000 Stephen M. Schwebel 1968 Not awarded 2001 Prosper Weil† 1969 Not awarded 2002 Thomas Buergenthal 1970 Paul Guggenheim† 2003 Thomas M. Franck† 1971 Not awarded 2004 W. Michael Reisman 1972 Not awarded 2005 Elihu Lauterpacht† 1973 Not awarded 2006 Theodor Meron 1974 Not awarded 2007 Andreas Lowenfeld† 1975 Not awarded 2008 John Jackson† 1976 Myres McDougal† 2009 Charles N.
    [Show full text]
  • Principles Guiding Humanitarian Action National Societies Amelia B
    Principles guiding 97 Number 897/8 Spring/Summer 2015 Volume humanitarian action Volume 97 Number 897/8 Spring/Summer 2015 Volume 97 Number 897/8 Spring/Summer 2015 Editorial: The humanitarian ethos in action Vincent Bernard, Editor-in-Chief The new Editorial Board of the International Review of the Red Cross Interview: Mr. Ma Qiang Former Executive Vice President of the Shanghai Branch of the Chinese Red Cross Humanitarian principles put to the test: Challenges to humanitarian action during decolonization Andrew Thompson Romancing principles and human rights: Are humanitarian principles salvageable? Stuart Gordon and Antonio Donini Unpacking the principle of humanity: Tensions and implications Larissa Fast Volunteers and responsibility for risk-taking: Changing interpretations of the Charter of Médecins Sans Frontières Caroline Abu Sa’Da and Xavier Crombé A matter of principle(s): The legal effect of impartiality and neutrality on States as humanitarian actors Kubo Macˇák Applying the humanitarian principles: Reflecting on the experience of the International Committee of the Red Cross Jérémie Labbé and Pascal Daudin Walking the walk: Evidence of Principles in Action from Red Cross and Red Crescent Principles guiding humanitarian action National Societies Amelia B. Kyazze Humanitarian debate: Law, policy, action Legislating against humanitarian principles: A case study on the humanitarian implications of Australian counterterrorism legislation Phoebe Wynn-Pope, Yvette Zegenhagen and Fauve Kurnadi From Fundamental Principles to individual action: Making the Principles come alive to promote a culture of non-violence and peace Katrien Beeckman Coming clean on neutrality and independence: The need to assess the application of humanitarian principles Ed Schenkenberg van Mierop Tools to do the job: The ICRC’s legal status, privileges and immunities Els Debuf Faith inspiration in a secular world: An Islamic perspective on humanitarian principles Lucy V.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lex Mercatoria and International Contracts: a Challenge for International Commercial Arbitration?" American University International Law Review 14, No
    American University International Law Review Volume 14 | Issue 3 Article 2 1999 The Lex eM rcatoria and International Contracts: A Challenge for International Commercial Arbitration? Abul F.M. Maniruzzaman [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/auilr Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Manriruzzaman, Abul F.M. "The Lex Mercatoria and International Contracts: A Challenge for International Commercial Arbitration?" American University International Law Review 14, no. 3 (1999): 657-734. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington College of Law Journals & Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in American University International Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE LEXMERCA TORIA AND INTERNATIONAL CONTRACTS: A CHALLENGE FOR INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION? ABUL F.M. MANIRUZZAMAN INTRODUCTION .............................................. 658 I. THE THEORY OF THE LEXMERCATORI4 .............. 660 I. DIFFERENT ASPECTS CONCERNING THE LEX M ERCATORIA ............................................ 670 A. Is THE LEXMERCATORIA AUTONOMOUS? . .. 670 B. SOURCES OF THE LEX MERCA TORIA ........................ 672 C. THE CONTENT OF THE LEXMERCATOR. ................... 673 D. THE LEXMERCATORIA AND PARTY AUTONOMY ............ 678 E. THE LEXMERCA TORIA AND THE CONFLICT OF LAWS ....... 680 F. AMIABLE COMPOSITION, Ex AEQUO ET BONO AND THE LEXMERCATORIA ......................................... 686 G. IS THE LEXMERCATORIA UNIVERSAL? ... 690 IV. THE ROLE OF ARBITRATOR IN THE DEVELOP- MENT OF THE LEXMERCATORIA ...................... 693 V. APPLICATION OF THE LEX MERCATOPA BY TRIBUNALS: THE PRESENT STATE ................... 694 VI.
    [Show full text]
  • William Bradford, Barbarians at the Gates
    BARBARIANS AT THE GATES: A POST-SEPTEMBER 11TH..., 73 Miss. L.J. 639 73 Miss. L.J. 639 Mississippi Law Journal Winter 2004 Article BARBARIANS AT THE GATES: A POST-SEPTEMBER 11TH PROPOSAL TO RATIONALIZE THE LAWS OF WAR William Bradforda1 Copyright (c) 2004 Mississippi Law Journal, Inc.; William Bradford “And were a civilized nation engaged with barbarians, who observed no rules of war, the former must also suspend their observance of them, where they no longer serve to any purpose; and must render every action or recounter as bloody and pernicious as possible to the first aggressors.”1 I. Introduction A. Humanizing War with Law: Aspiration Since the dawn of man,2 war3 has been justified as an *640 object of divine ordination,4 the natural state of humanity5 and a tool in the progressive betterment of character,6 culture7 and civilization.8 In this hyper- ideological age tragically *641 symbolized by September 11, 2001, war, to the dismay of those who hoped material transformations might weaken its siren’s call,9 waxes ever more destructive,10 driving efforts to abolish force as a moral imperative11 and, less quixotically, to induce compliance with an accreting body of rules, known as international humanitarian law (IHL),12 to “humanize” armed conflict. *643 13 This progressive regulation14 has met nearly universal approbation:15 many ethical people, instinctively antipathetic *644 to war,16 welcome any anodyne and few proclaim its absolute independence from legal regulation.17 Indeed, the distinction between “murder” and “ killing in war” is now difficult to sustain without reference to positive law,18 and the term “war crime”19 has entered the popular lexicon20 accompanied by images of atrocity that provoke moral outrage.21 Empirically, states and individuals obey IHL at least some of the time,22 and the phrase “laws of war” is no longer ipso facto oxymoronic.
    [Show full text]
  • Hersch Lauterpacht and Early Formulations of Crimes Against Humanity
    Hersch Lauterpacht and Early Formulations of Crimes Against Humanity Douglas Irvin-Erickson Introduction Crimes against humanity first emerged in international law in 1945, when the allied powers that won World War II—the United States, United Kingdom, the Soviet Union, and France—granted the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg jurisdiction to prosecute German leaders for ‘crimes against peace,’ ‘war crimes,’ and ‘crimes against humanity.’1 Since the Nuremberg trials, the concept of crimes against humanity has expanded dramatically, which other essays in this volume describe. Most notably, as highlighted in the next essay in this volume, international law has now affirmed that, unlike war crimes, crimes against humanity may be committed in times of formal peace. As William Schabas has put it, many colloquially view crimes against humanity as being analogous to serious violations of human rights, but ‘in the case of breaches of international human rights law, it is the state that is held responsible, whereas in the case of crimes against humanity, individuals are the perpetrators and they are the ones who are held criminally responsible.’2 Thus, violations of human rights might trigger orders to cease certain actions or compensate victims, but violations of crimes against humanity can lead to the imprisonment of state officials, and even heads of state. The emergence of crimes against humanity in the 20th century as a crime under international law was a watershed moment in the history of the modern international system of states. Together with the 1948 United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, the formulation of crimes against humanity in the Nuremberg Charter marked the first moment when states themselves formalized exceptions to the rule that state sovereignty shielded leaders of states, including heads of state, from individual criminal prosecution for how they treated their own citizens and populations within their borders.
    [Show full text]
  • Hersch Lauterpacht: an Introduction1
    Panor. Braz. law - Year 6 -Numbers 9 and 10 - 2018 - pp. 274 - 301. ISSN 1075-1343 (print) ISSN 2318-1516 (online) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17768/pbl.y6.n9-10.p274-301 HERSCH LAUTERPACHT: AN INTRODUCTION1 George Rodrigo Bandeira Galindo Professor and Head of the University of Brasília‘s Faculty of Law INTRODUCTION Seldom have authors produced such a longstanding impact on doctrine and practice for successive generations of international law scholars. The so-called “fathers” of international law, such as Grotius, Gentilli, Vitoria and Suárez, are frequently recalled as one wishes to quote the most influential scholars of the field, but if one should give international law a sense of dynamism, in the sense of observing it as a set of ideas that must affect reality, its “paternity” should be revalued regularly, and, dare I say, more constantly. Like few, Hersch Lauterpacht knew that scholars do not communicate with the past through mere bonds of blood, but rather through loyalties that are constantly put to the test. In a major essay originally published in 1946, The Grotian Tradition in International Law, he intended to alert his colleagues to a series of duties of which Grotius had been reminding them since the 17th century. The historical moment for such a reminder could not have been more appropriate. In 1946, the world needed to be reconstructed, the projects of longstanding peace were a necessity of the common citizen, institutions and rules needed to warrant stability to the many social relationships that surpassed the borders of the states. Although many which had survived to both world wars could not give up on some level of comprehensible suspicion, there was patent urgency that international law scholars should be the “aerials of the kind”.
    [Show full text]
  • Conversations with Professor Philip James Allott by Lesley Dingle1 and Daniel Bates2
    Conversations with Professor Philip James Allott by Lesley Dingle1 and Daniel Bates2 First Interview: Early Years (1937-1963) Date: 18 February 2011 Between February and April 2011, Professor Allott was interviewed five times at his room off stairway F at Trinity College to record his reminiscences of almost sixty years of a varied career which was spent initially in various capacities at the FCO, and in later years in the Faculty of Law at Cambridge. The interviews were recorded, and the audio version is available on this website with this transcript of those recordings. The questions and topics are sequentially numbered in the three interviews for use in a database of citations made across the Eminent Scholars Archive to personalities mentioned therein. Interviewer: Lesley Dingle, her questions and topics are in bold type Professor Allott’s answers are in normal type. Comments added by LD, in italics. All footnotes added by LD. 1. Professor Allott it’s a great pleasure to interview you for the Eminent Scholars Archive. Your scholastic reputation is grounded on dual foundations, what we might call an early apprenticeship as a legal advisor in the Civil Service at the Foreign & Commonwealth Office and later as a prominent academic here in Cambridge. During these interviews for the archive, could we talk initially about the highlights of your life and career and then come later to a general discussion or your scholarly work. I’m sure there’ll be many listeners very eager to hear more of your radical visions for the future of international law and its role in shaping human society.
    [Show full text]