DOCSLIB.ORG

The Extermination of Peaceful Soviet Citizens: Aron Trainin and International Law Written by Michelle Jean Penn Has Been Approved for the Department of History

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Extermination of Peaceful Soviet Citizens: Aron Trainin and International Law Written by Michelle Jean Penn Has Been Approved for the Department of History THE EXTERMINATION OF PEACEFUL SOVIET CITIZENS: ARON TRAININ AND INTERNATIONAL LAW by MICHELLE JEAN PENN B.A., Cornell College, 2008 J.D., Washington University in St. Louis, 2011 A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History 2017 i This dissertation entitled: The Extermination of Peaceful Soviet Citizens: Aron Trainin and International Law written by Michelle Jean Penn has been approved for the Department of History ____________________________________ David Shneer ____________________________________ David Ciarlo ______________ Date The final copy of this dissertation has been examined by the signatories, and we find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline. ii Penn, Michelle Jean (Ph.D., History) The Extermination of Peaceful Soviet Citizens: Aron Trainin and International Law Dissertation directed by Professor David Shneer This dissertation examines the life and work of Soviet Jewish lawyer Aron Trainin, placing him in conversation with his better-known contemporaries, the founder of the concept of genocide Raphael Lemkin, and human rights advocate Hersch Lauterpacht. Together these three legal minds—who differed widely in temperament and approaches to law but possessed similar backgrounds as Jewish lawyers from the eastern European borderlands, developed concepts foundations to the Nuremberg Tribunal and, subsequently, modern international criminal law. By situating Trainin’s work with Lemkin’s and Lauterpacht’s, this dissertation acknowledges the central role Trainin played in the development of international criminal law on the international stage. Trainin’s work also played a significant role in how the events of the Holocaust were conceptualized and portrayed in the Soviet Union. Trainin’s concept of “crimes against peace” was instrumental in portraying the crimes of the Nazis and their accomplices as crimes against “peaceful Soviet citizens.” Finally, this dissertation reveals that rather than rejecting international law, the Soviet Union provided critiques and an alternative approach to international law. iii Table of Contents Introduction . .1 Chapter 1: A Brief History of International Legal Thought, or, a Brief History of Christian Europe’s Imperial International Legal Thought . .13 Chapter 2: Three Eastern European Jews from the Russian Borderlands Who Defined International Law . 37 Chapter 3: Soviet Law, Trainin, and the Moscow “Show Trials” . 78 Chapter 4: ‘For Which There is No Name in Any Human Language:’ Hitlerite Responsibility Under Criminal Law. 111 Chapter 5: The Struggle of the Progressive Forces: The 1948 Genocide Convention. 167 Chapter 6: When the Genocide Convention Meets the Cold War: The Last Years of Trainin, Lemkin, and Lauterpacht. 200 Epilogue: The Russian Federation, the United States, and International Law Today. .244 Bibliography . .257 iv Introduction Late summer, 1945. The end of the war was in sight for the Allied powers. Representatives for the United States, the Soviet Union, Great Britain and France met in London to discuss how to bring the Axis powers to justice when the war ended. These negotiations culminated in the London Agreement signed on August 8, 1945, and the subsequent creation of the Nuremberg Tribunal. The Soviet government sent Aron Trainin, a well-known legal academic, to London to represent the Soviet government’s position on how the international legal order should prosecute the unprecedented crimes that had just taken place. Hersch Lauterpacht, an émigré professor in nearby Cambridge, advised the United States representative, Supreme Court Justice Robert H. Jackson, on how the Agreement should approach international law. Raphael Lemkin, a Polish lawyer who had tried unsuccessfully to join Jackson’s team, also joined the lawyers in London with the goal of persuading the representatives of the victorious powers to include his newly coined concept of “genocide” in the London Agreement. Together these three legal minds—who differed widely in temperament and legal writing styles but possessed similar backgrounds as Jewish lawyers from the eastern European borderlands, or after World War II, “bloodlands” according to one strand of current historiography1—would develop concepts foundational to the Nuremberg Tribunal and, subsequently, modern international criminal law. While all three men were instrumental in shaping post-war international law, they all approached this peculiar field of law from very different theoretical perspectives and they have been “remembered” differently. While Raphael Lemkin has been remembered for his role in creating the concept of genocide, and Hersch Lauterpacht has been lionized among Western international lawyers (the legal scholar Phillipe 1 See Timothy Snyder, Bloodlands: Europe Between Hitler and Stalin, (New York: Basic Books, 2010). 1 Sands calls Lauterpacht his “legal hero”2), the third in this crucial triumvirate of legal minds in London, Aron Trainin, has largely been forgotten. The forgetting of Trainin is not accidental. To overlook Trainin’s role in the development of international criminal law conveniently ignores the central role the Soviet Union played in developing the concepts of aggressive war, genocide, and human rights. In the process, it reinforces the narrative that international law was made by Western European lawyers (and their North American descendants). Trainin has been largely forgotten, I argue, because most scholarship on Soviet legal history dismisses Soviet criminal law as itself ipso facto political, mere propaganda produced by the Soviet government, and thus does not actively “study” Soviet law as law.3 The dismissive attitude to Soviet law has its origins in Cold War scholarship, of course. And it might well trace back to the fact, observed by Sheila Fitzpatrick, that “some readers may think that nothing but sustained outrage is appropriate for writing about a great evildoer like Stalin.”4 However, as Fitzpatrick reasons, “the historian’s job is different from that of prosecutor, or, for that matter, counsel for the defense.”5 Instead, the historian’s job is to help illuminate and understand the past. As a Soviet lawyer, Trainin’s job was different: to 2 Phillipe Sands, “My Legal Hero: Hersch Lauterpacht,” The Guardian, Nov. 10, 2010 https://www.theguardian.com/law/2010/nov/10/my-legal-hero-hersch-lauterpacht (last accessed January 10, 2017). 3 See e.g., Victor Vasilyevich Nikulin, “Criminal Law Policy and Penalty Institution in the Criminal Law of the Soviet Russia in the 1920s,” Society, Politics, Economics, Law (Sept. 1, 2013), David R. Shearer, Policing Stalin’s Socialism: Repression and Social Order in the Soviet Union, 1924-1953, (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009). Some contemporaries of the Soviet Union applied a legal perspective to Soviet law, Harold Berman , William E. Butler, Richard J. Erickson, and F.J.M Feldbrugge are the most prominent Western examples (see, e.g. F.J.M. Feldbrugge, Encyclopedia of Soviet Law, (Leiden: A.W. Sijthoff, 1973), Richard J. Erickson, International Law and the Revolutionary State, (Leiden: A.W. Sijthoff, 1972)), and as to be expected, numerous Soviet scholars, such as A.N. Trainin, Evgenii Aleksandrovich Korovin, and Grigorii I. Tunkin. V.M. Kuritsyn’s Sovetskaia istoriko- pravovaia nauka: ocherki stanovleniia i razvitiia, (Moskva : Nauka, 1978), is one fairly well-known example of a Soviet legal history, though Soviet legal history as such does not appear to be a popular area of study for many historians, Russian or not. A G Zviagintsev; Iurii Grigorʹevich Orlov, Prigovorennye vremenem: rossiiskie i sovetskie prokurory: XX vek, 1937-1953 (Moskva : ROSSPĖ N, 2001) and George Ginsburgs, “The Jurisdictional Scope of Soviet Law,” Europe-Asia Studies, (Vol.45, Issue 4, Jan. 1993), are exceptions to this. 4 Sheila Fitzpatrick, On Stalin’s Team: The Years of Living Dangerously in Soviet Politics, (Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2015), 10. 5 Fitzpatrick, 10. 2 argue for, and justify the Soviet Union’s positions regardless of their morality or immorality, in the same way that John Yoo used legal argument to justify the United States’ legitimization of torture under George Bush.6 Peter Solomon’s Soviet Criminal Justice under Stalin represents the most formidable work regarding Soviet legal history as legal history, rather than as simply political history.7 Solomon argues that while the regime often used criminal justice as a political tool, one also sees public life operating largely according to the law.8 Ordinary criminals were acquitted at levels similar to Western European countries and the rule of law appears to have been largely respected for non-political prisoners.9 In the sphere of international legal history, Francine Hirsch represents one of the more innovative voices in acknowledging and reconstructing the Soviet influence in the creation of international criminal law at Nuremberg.10 Rather than dismissing the influence of the Soviet Union in international law as simply an imposition of the will of the dictator Stalin, Hirsch examines why certain Soviet arguments were accepted as legally desirable by British, French, and American government lawyers. This approach is more helpful in understanding the development of international criminal law, rather than dismissing the Soviet 6 See, e.g. Deputy Assistant
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Change the World Without Taking Power. the Meaning of Revolution Today
    Change the World without Taking Power. The Meaning of Revolution Today. John Holloway Originally published 2002 by Pluto Press Chapter 1 – The Scream . 2 Chapter 2 – Beyond the State? . 9 Chapter 3 – Beyond Power? . 14 Chapter 4 – Fetishism . 30 Chapter 5 – Fetishism and Fetishisation . 52 Chapter 6 – Anti-fetishism and Criticism . 70 Chapter 7 – The Tradition of Scientific Marxism . 77 Chapter 8 – The Critical-Revolutionary Subject . 91 Chapter 9 – The Material Reality of Anti-Power . .101 Chapter 10 – The Material Reality of Anti-Power and the Crisis of Capital . Chapter 11 – Revolution? . 132 1 Chapter 1 - The Scream I In the beginning is the scream. We scream. When we write or when we read, it is easy to forget that the beginning is not the word, but the scream. Faced with the mutilation of human lives by capitalism, a scream of sadness, a scream of horror, a scream of anger, a scream of refusal: NO. The starting point of theoretical reflection is opposition, negativity, struggle. It is from rage that thought is born, not from the pose of reason, not from the reasoned-sitting-back-and-reflecting-on- the-mysteries-of-existence that is the conventional image of ‘the thinker’. We start from negation, from dissonance. The dissonance can take many shapes. An inarticulate mumble of discontent, tears of frustration, a scream of rage, a confident roar. An unease, a confusion, a longing, a critical vibration. Our dissonance comes from our experience, but that experience varies. Sometimes it is the direct experience of exploitation in the factory, or of oppression in the home, of stress in the office, of hunger and poverty, or of state violence or discrimination.
    [Show full text]
  • Abdülhamid II, 80–81 Abjection, 251, 494 Abolitionism, 74, 83, 85
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-10358-0 — The Problems of Genocide A. Dirk Moses Index More Information INDEX Abdülhamid II, 80–81 Britain and, 152, 506 abjection, 251, 494 civilian destruction and, 1, 151–152, abolitionism, 74, 83, 85–86, 88–89, 167–168, 230–232, 236, 238, 91–92, 124–125 439, 504–506 in American colonies, 69–70 collateral damage of, 1, 238 as birth of human rights justice, 72 colonialism and, 506 British, 68–73, 125–127 debate on, 18 Christianity and, 86–87 desensitization to, 432–433 colonialism and, 69–70, 87–88 drone strikes, 1, 3–4, 439–440, humanitarianism and, 68–73 490–491 imperialism and, 71–72, 87–88 erosion of distinction between as justification of imperial mission, combatants and civilians and, 71–72 503–507, 511 language of transgression and, 70–71 excluded from definition of genocide, Aborigines, 76–77, 87–88, 264–267 18–20 Aborigines Protection Society, 87–89 France and, 152 Abrahams, Elliot, 461–462 international law and, 503 Abyssinia, Italian invasion of, 167–168 liberal permanent security and, 506 Academic Liaison against Renewed missile strikes, 1–2, 439–440 Militarism, 458–459 Nazi regime and, 505 Acadians, 398–399 principle of distinction and, 503, accountability, 425–426, 428–430, 506–507 432–438, 451–452, 471–472, See terrorization of civilians by, 164–166 also responsibility United States and, 1–2, 36, 232, 237, Aceh, Indonesia, 114–116 396–397, 416–418, 424, Ache people, 445–447 430–433, 438–439, 457–458, 506 Aden, 391–392 Vietnam War and, 424 administrative separation, 335–336, See World
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Response to Propaganda Broadcasts Related to Crisis in and Around Ukraine, 2014–2015
    International Journal of Communication 9(2015), Feature 3125–3145 1932–8036/2015FEA0002 Legal Response to Propaganda Broadcasts Related to Crisis in and Around Ukraine, 2014–2015 ANDREI G. RICHTER1 Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) Keywords: freedom of expression, freedom of the media, propaganda for war, incitement to hatred, international standards, rule of law, national regulators, Russia, Ukraine, UK, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova The conflict in and around Ukraine in 2014–2015 has brought about the spread of propaganda for war and hatred, especially on television and on the Internet. Research on the national laws and resolutions made by courts and independent media regulators that adjudicated complaints on Russian TV propaganda in Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, the UK, and Ukraine shows that the national courts and regulators made few references to international norms, resting, rather, on domestically developed standards. As a result, there was a lack of solid grounds for stopping, blocking, and banning programs emanating from Russian media. In particular, there was no clear line between propaganda for war and hatred, proscribed under international norms, and legally protected Kremlin interpretation of the events in Ukraine. The comparative analysis of case law attempts to provide a modern rationale for regulation of propaganda for war and hatred and through it to offer relevant recommendations. Introduction The year 2014 marked the 100th anniversary of the beginning of World War I. It is worthwhile to recall that the Austro-Hungarian ultimatum to Serbia, which precipitated the start of the hostilities, included a major demand to stop nationalistic propaganda, as it flared the existing controversies.
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptualising Historical Crimes
    Should crimes committed in the course of Conceptualising history that are comparable to genocide, crimes against humanity or war crimes be Historical Crimes referred to as such, whatever the label used at the time?180 This is the question I want to examine below. Let us compare the prob- lems of labelling historical crimes with his- torical and recent concepts, respectively.181 Historical concepts for historical crimes “Historical concepts” are terms used to de- scribe practices by the contemporaries of these practices. Scholars can defend the use of historical concepts with the argu- ment that many practices deemed inadmis- sible today (such as slavery, human sacri- fice, heritage destruction, racism, censor- ship, etc.) were accepted as rather normal and sometimes even as morally and legally right in some periods of the past. Arguably, then, it would be unfaithful to the sources, misleading and even anachronistic to use Antoon De Baets the present, accusatory labels to describe University of Groningen them. This would mean, for example, that one should not call the crimes committed during the Crusades crimes against hu- manity (even if a present observer would have good reason to qualify some of these crimes as such), for such a concept was nonexistent at the time. A radical variant of the latter is the view that not only recent la- bels should be avoided but even any moral judgments of past crimes. This argument, however, can be coun- tered with several objections. First, diverg- ing judgments. It is well known that parties V HISTOREIN OLU M E 11 (2011) involved in violent conflicts label these conflicts differently.
    [Show full text]
  • Eugen Ehrlich, Evgeny Pashukanis, and Meaningful Freedom Through Incremental Jurisprudential Change
    Journal of Libertarian Studies JLS Volume 23 (2019): 64–90 A Practical Approach to Legal- Pluralist Anarchism: Eugen Ehrlich, Evgeny Pashukanis, and Meaningful Freedom through Incremental Jurisprudential Change Jason M. Morgan2 ABSTRACT: John Hasnas (2008) has famously argued that anarchy is obvious and everywhere. It is less well known, however, that Hasnas also argues that anarchy must be achieved gradually. But how can this work? In this paper, I show that directly confronting state power will never produce viable anarchy (or minarchy). Using the example of Soviet jurist Evgeny Pashukanis, I detail an episode in apparent anti-statism which, by relying on the state, ended in disaster for the putative anti-statist. I next show how combining the theories of Austrian legal thinker Eugen Ehrlich and American political philosopher William Sewell, Jr., can lead to a gradual undoing of state power via case law. Finally, I bring in the example of Japanese jurist and early anti-statist Suehiro Izutarō as a warning. Suehiro also attempted to decrease state power by means of case law, but because he lacked a clear anti-statist teleology he ended up becoming an accomplice of state power, even imperialism. The way to Hasnian anarchy/minarchy lies through the skillful application of case law with an eye always towards the attenuation, and eventual elimination, of the power of the state. Jason M. Morgan ([email protected]) is associate professor of foreign languages at Reitaku University. The author would like to thank Lenore Ealy, Joe Salerno, and Mark Thornton for helpful comments on an early draft of this article.
    [Show full text]
  • Course Handbook
    SL12 Page 1 of 29 UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE DEPARTMENT OF SLAVONIC STUDIES PAPER SL12: SOCIALIST RUSSIA 1917-1991 HANDBOOK Daria Mattingly [email protected] SL12 Page 2 of 29 INTRODUCTION COURSE AIMS The course is designed to provide you with a thorough grounding in and advanced understanding of Russia’s social, political and economic history in the period under review and to prepare you for the exam, all the while fostering in you deep interest in Soviet history. BEFORE THE COURSE BEGINS Familiarise yourself with the general progression of Soviet history by reading through one or more of the following: Applebaum, A. Red Famine. Stalin's War on Ukraine (2017) Figes, Orlando Revolutionary Russia, 1891-1991 (2014) Hobsbawm, E. J. The Age of Extremes 1914-1991 (1994) Kenez, Peter A History of the Soviet Union from the Beginning to the End (2006) Lovell, Stephen The Soviet Union: A Very Short Introduction (2009) Suny, Ronald Grigor The Soviet Experiment: Russia, the USSR, and the Successor States (2010) Briefing meeting: There’ll be a meeting on the Wednesday before the first teaching day of Michaelmas. Check with the departmental secretary for time and venue. It’s essential that you attend and bring this handbook with you. COURSE STRUCTURE The course comprises four elements: lectures, seminars, supervisions and reading. Lectures: you’ll have sixteen lectures, eight in Michaelmas and eight in Lent. The lectures provide an introduction to and overview of the course, but no more. It’s important to understand that the lectures alone won’t enable you to cover the course, nor will they by themselves prepare you for the exam.
    [Show full text]
  • Sir Elihu Lauterpacht QC Issue : Vol
    Transnational Dispute Management www.transnational-dispute-management.com ISSN : 1875-4120 TDM 3 (2018) - Sir Elihu Lauterpacht QC Issue : Vol. 15, issue 3 Published : April 2018 Introduction Professor Maurice Mendelson QC 2 Sir Elihu Lauterpacht QC and the Settlement of Maritime Disputes Judge D.H. Anderson CMG 5 Sir Elihu Lauterpacht and the Lauterpacht Centre for International Law at the University of Cambridge Professor Eyal Benvenisti, Dr. Sarah Nouwen and Dr. Michael Waibel 8 Elihu Lauterpacht, LCIL and the Lauterpacht Tradition Sir Elihu Lauterpacht QC Judge James Crawford AC 11 (1928 - 2017) Board Member in Memoriam Influencing International Law without Dispute Professor Robert McCorquodale 19 Sir Elihu Lauterpacht: a Celebration of his Life and Work - Some Remarks on Eli's Academic Writings on International Litigation Professor Iain Scobbie 21 Sir Elihu Lauterpacht QC: the Practitioner as Publicist Sir Michael Wood QC 25 © Copyright TDM 2018 TDM Cover v6.1 Introduction Professor Maurice Mendelson QC* ELIHU LAUTERPACHT was a valued member of the Editorial Board of TDM1, and we decided that it would be appropriate to mark his passing in 2017 with a few reminiscences by some of those who knew and admired him. I would like to express my sincere thanks to those who took the time out of their busy schedules to write the tributes that follow. *** Elihu (known to all as Eli) was born in London in 1928, the only child of Rachel (née Steinberg) and Hersch Lauterpacht, Jewish immigrants from central and Eastern Europe. Despite his foreign origins, Hersch was to become, not only Whewell Professor of International Law at Cambridge University and a knight of the realm, but one of the leading international lawyers of his generation, and certainly one of the most imaginative and most admired.
    [Show full text]
  • LCSH Section W
    W., D. (Fictitious character) William Kerr Scott Lake (N.C.) Waaddah Island (Wash.) USE D. W. (Fictitious character) William Kerr Scott Reservoir (N.C.) BT Islands—Washington (State) W.12 (Military aircraft) BT Reservoirs—North Carolina Waaddah Island (Wash.) USE Hansa Brandenburg W.12 (Military aircraft) W particles USE Waadah Island (Wash.) W.13 (Seaplane) USE W bosons Waag family USE Hansa Brandenburg W.13 (Seaplane) W-platform cars USE Waaga family W.29 (Military aircraft) USE General Motors W-cars Waag River (Slovakia) USE Hansa Brandenburg W.29 (Military aircraft) W. R. Holway Reservoir (Okla.) USE Váh River (Slovakia) W.A. Blount Building (Pensacola, Fla.) UF Chimney Rock Reservoir (Okla.) Waaga family (Not Subd Geog) UF Blount Building (Pensacola, Fla.) Holway Reservoir (Okla.) UF Vaaga family BT Office buildings—Florida BT Lakes—Oklahoma Waag family W Award Reservoirs—Oklahoma Waage family USE Prix W W. R. Motherwell Farmstead National Historic Park Waage family W.B. Umstead State Park (N.C.) (Sask.) USE Waaga family USE William B. Umstead State Park (N.C.) USE Motherwell Homestead National Historic Site Waahi, Lake (N.Z.) W bosons (Sask.) UF Lake Rotongaru (N.Z.) [QC793.5.B62-QC793.5.B629] W. R. Motherwell Stone House (Sask.) Lake Waahi (N.Z.) UF W particles UF Motherwell House (Sask.) Lake Wahi (N.Z.) BT Bosons Motherwell Stone House (Sask.) Rotongaru, Lake (N.Z.) W. Burling Cocks Memorial Race Course at Radnor BT Dwellings—Saskatchewan Wahi, Lake (N.Z.) Hunt (Malvern, Pa.) W.S. Payne Medical Arts Building (Pensacola, Fla.) BT Lakes—New Zealand UF Cocks Memorial Race Course at Radnor Hunt UF Medical Arts Building (Pensacola, Fla.) Waʻahila Ridge (Hawaii) (Malvern, Pa.) Payne Medical Arts Building (Pensacola, Fla.) BT Mountains—Hawaii BT Racetracks (Horse racing)—Pennsylvania BT Office buildings—Florida Waaihoek (KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa) W-cars W star algebras USE Waay Hoek (KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa : USE General Motors W-cars USE C*-algebras Farm) W.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural and Psychological Perspectives on the Perpetrator of Genocide Marin, Roxana
    www.ssoar.info Structural and psychological perspectives on the perpetrator of genocide Marin, Roxana Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Marin, R. (2012). Structural and psychological perspectives on the perpetrator of genocide. Studia Politica: Romanian Political Science Review, 12(2), 235-258. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-445686 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY-NC-ND Lizenz This document is made available under a CC BY-NC-ND Licence (Namensnennung-Nicht-kommerziell-Keine Bearbeitung) zur (Attribution-Non Comercial-NoDerivatives). For more Information Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.de Structural and Psychological Perspectives on the Perpetrator of Genocide 235 Structural and Psychological Perspectives on the Perpetrator of Genocide ROXANA MARIN ”Any broad historical examination of the phenomenon of genocide cannot fruitfully proceed without engagement with issues of collective human psychopathology.” MARK LEVENE1 ”Understanding genocide requires probing the minds of those who commit it, and those who seek to prevent or limit it.” ADAM JONES2 There is a statutory contention that violence and killing is some sort of irreducible mark of the human being, an inseparable trait encrypted within the human nature. Interhumane violence is a biblical manifestation, Elie Wiesel would sententiously argue about one of the introductory scenes of the Bible whose protagonists are brothers Cain and Abel: ”Two men [and] one of them became a killer”3. From the slaughter of Abel to mass killings the Holy Book of Judeo-Christian tradition counts only several pages.
    [Show full text]
  • Elihu Lauterpacht, LCIL and the Lauterpacht Tradition James
    Elihu Lauterpacht, LCIL and the Lauterpacht Tradition James Crawford AC* My focus here is Eli’s relation to what is still thought of as the Lauterpacht tradition of thinking about and doing international law, a tradition largely identified with his father, Hersch Lauterpacht, scholar and judge – but which Eli contributed to perpetuating and consolidating.1 Precisely because Hersch’s contribution is even now so well-known, nearly 60 years after his death, it seems appropriate to focus first on Eli’s own, distinct, career. This one can in part recall by listing the various things he started or continued and which are in many cases now institutions, which embody new ideas or which at least evoke strong memories. This account is of course merely indicative. First there was judging and arbitrating. He was once appointed an ad hoc judge in a case before the International Court, in the early stages of Bosnian Genocide. His separate opinion in that case (in some respects a dissenting opinion) is notable for its analysis of the role of the ad hoc judge. He said… consistently with the duty of impartiality by which the ad hoc judge is bound, there is still something specific that distinguishes his role. He has, I believe, the special obligation to endeavour to ensure that, so far as is reasonable, every relevant argument in favour of the party that has appointed him has been fully appreciated in the course of collegial consideration and, ultimately, is reflected – though not necessarily accepted – in any separate or dissenting opinion…2 * © James Crawford, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • A Turbulent Year for Ukraine Urbulent Was the Way to Describe 2009 for Ukraine, Which Plunged Into Financial Crisis
    No. 3 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, JANUARY 17, 2010 5 2009: THE YEAR IN REVIEW A turbulent year for Ukraine urbulent was the way to describe 2009 for Ukraine, which plunged into financial crisis. No other European country suffered as much as TUkraine, whose currency was devalued by more than 60 percent since its peak of 4.95 hrv per $1 in August 2008. In addition, the country’s industrial production fell by 31 percent in 2009. Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko con- fronted the challenge of minimizing the crisis fallout, while at the same time campaigning for the 2010 presi- dential elections. Her critics attacked her for pursuing populist policies, such as increasing wages and hiring more government staff, when the state treasury was broke as early as the spring. Ms. Tymoshenko herself admitted that her gov- ernment would not have been able to make all its pay- ments without the help of three tranches of loans, worth approximately $10.6 billion, provided by the International Monetary Fund. Her critics believe that instead of borrowing money, Ms. Tymoshenko should have been introducing radical reforms to the Ukrainian economy, reducing government waste, eliminating out- dated Soviet-era benefits and trimming the bureaucracy. The year began with what is becoming an annual tra- Offi cial Website of Ukraine’s President dition in Ukraine – a natural gas conflict provoked by the government of Russian Federation Prime Minister President Viktor Yushchenko and Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko at the heated February 10 meeting of Vladimir Putin. Whereas the New Year’s Day crisis of the National Security and Defense Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War, Humanitarian Law and the United Nations
    Civil War, Humanitarian Law and the United Nations Stefan Oeter I. Introduction Emer de Vattel, in his classical treatise "Le Droit des Gens ou Principes de la Loi Naturelle", introduced his observations concerning civil war with some famous remarks that urged for caution in dealing with the topic: "It is a much-discussed question whether the sovereign must observe the ordinary laws of war in dealing with rebellious subjects who have openly taken up arms against him. A flatterer at court or a cruel tyrant will immediately answer that the laws of war are not made for rebels, who deserve nothing better than death."' Vattel, however, reminded his readers to "proceed more temperatelyn and to argue the matter upon the "incon- testable principles" of reason and of natural law. The warning against precipitate conclusions that was formulated by Vattel still has its justification, even nowadays. This is not only due to the Martens clause: which in its modernized version in the Additional Pro- tocols of 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 provides that "... in cases not covered by the law in force, the human person remains under the protection of the principles of humanity and the dictates of the 1 E, de Vattel, The Law of Nations or the Principles ofNatural Law Applied to the Conduct and to the Affairs of Nattons and of Soveretgns, Translation of the Edition of 1758 by C.G. Fenwick, 1916,336 para. 287. 2 Concerning the Martens Clause cf. R. G. Allen/M. Cherniack / G. J. An- dreopoulos, "Refining War: Civil Wars and Humanitarian Controls", HRQ 18 (1996), 747 et seq., (751-752); H.
    [Show full text]