Erand Gardens Ext 70 (Protea Gardens Erf 765), Gauteng Province

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Erand Gardens Ext 70 (Protea Gardens Erf 765), Gauteng Province REPORT WETLAND HYDROPEDOLOGY IDENTIFICATION AND MANAGEMENT REPORT: ERAND GARDENS EXT 70 (PROTEA GARDENS ERF 765), GAUTENG PROVINCE 9 March, 2018 Compiled by: J.H. van der Waals (PhD Soil Science, Pr.Sci.Nat.) Registered with the South African Council for Natural Scientific Professions (Registration number: 400106/08) Member of: Soil Science Society of South Africa (SSSSA) Accredited member of: South African Soil Surveyors Organisation (SASSO) i Declaration I, Johan Hilgard van der Waals, declare that: • I act as the independent specialist in this application • I will perform the work relating to the application in an objective manner, even if this results in views and findings that are not favourable to the applicant • I declare that there are no circumstances that may compromise my objectivity in performing such work; • I have expertise in conducting the specialist report relevant to this application, including knowledge of the Act, regulations and any guidelines that have relevance to the proposed activity; • I will comply with the Act, regulations and all other applicable legislation; • I have no, and will not engage in, conflicting interests in the undertaking of the activity; • I undertake to disclose to the applicant and the competent authority all material information in my possession that reasonably has or may have the potential of influencing - any decision to be taken with respect to the application by the competent authority; and - the objectivity of any report, plan or document to be prepared by myself for submission to the competent authority; • all the particulars furnished by me in this form are true and correct; and • I realise that a false declaration is an offence in terms of Regulation 71 and is punishable in terms of Section 24F of the Act. J.H. VAN DER WAALS ii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Terms of Reference .......................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Aim of this Report ............................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Disclaimer ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.4 Methodology ..................................................................................................................... 2 1.5 Relevant Reports .............................................................................................................. 2 2. SITE LOCALITY AND DESCRIPTION .................................................................................... 3 2.1 Survey Area Boundary ...................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Land Type Data ................................................................................................................ 3 2.3 Topography ...................................................................................................................... 3 3. PROBLEM STATEMENT ........................................................................................................ 3 4. STATUTORY CONTEXT ........................................................................................................ 8 4.1. Wetlands ........................................................................................................................... 8 4.1.1 Wetland Definition ......................................................................................................... 8 4.1.2 Disaggregation of the Wetland Definition ....................................................................... 8 4.2 Watercourse Definition ...................................................................................................... 9 4.3 The Wetland Delineation Guidelines ................................................................................. 9 4.4 The Resource Directed Measures for Protection of Water Resources ............................ 10 4.4.1 The Resource Directed Measures for Protection of Water Resources: Volume 4: Wetland Ecosystems. ............................................................................................................ 11 4.4.2 The Resource Directed Measures for Protection of Water Resources: Generic Section “A” for Specialist Manuals – Water Resource Protection Policy Implementation Process ................................................................................................................................ 11 4.4.3 The Resource Directed Measures for Protection of Water Resources: Appendix W1 (Ecoregional Typing for Wetland Ecosystems) ...................................................................... 12 4.4.4 The Resource Directed Measures for Protection of Water Resources: Appendix W4 IER (Floodplain Wetlands) Present Ecological Status (PES) Method .................................... 12 4.4.5 The Resource Directed Measures for Protection of Water Resources: Appendix W5 IER (Floodplain Wetlands) Determining the Ecological Importance and Sensitivity (EIS) and the Ecological Management Class (EMC) ............................................................................. 16 4.5 Water Use Licence Applications and Risk Assessment ................................................... 17 4.6 Lack of Clarity on Reference State and Man-Made Wetlands ......................................... 17 4.7 The City of Johannesburg (CoJ) Wetland Layer .............................................................. 18 4.8 Summary and Proposed Approach ................................................................................. 19 5. CHALLENGES REGARDING WETLAND DELINEATION AND POLLUTION RISK ASSESSMENTS ON THE HALFWAY HOUSE GRANITE DOME ................................................. 20 5.1 Wetland Drivers and Ecological Responses .................................................................... 20 5.2 Soil as a Tool for Landscape Context and Hydrological Driver Description ..................... 22 5.3 Pedogenesis ................................................................................................................... 23 5.4 Water Movement in the Soil Profile ................................................................................. 24 5.5 Water Movement in the Landscape ................................................................................. 27 iii 5.6 The Catena Concept ....................................................................................................... 30 5.7 The Halfway House Granite Dome Catena ..................................................................... 31 5.8 Convex Versus Concave Landscapes in the Halfway House Granite Catena ................. 32 5.9 Implications for Wetland Delineation and Application of the Guidelines .......................... 33 5.10 Implications for Wetland Conservation in Urban Environments.................................... 34 5.11 Implications for Water Movement in the Landscape (Conceptual) ............................... 37 5.12 Implications for Downstream Wetlands, Watercourses and Landscapes ..................... 38 5.13 Soil Erosion on the Halfway House Granite Dome....................................................... 39 5.14 Sustainable Urban Drainage Considerations ............................................................... 42 5.14.1 SuDS Philosophy and Options ................................................................................. 42 5.14.2 SuDS – Practical Considerations in the HHGD Area ................................................ 42 6. METHOD OF WETLAND INVESTIGATION AND IDENTIFICATION ..................................... 45 6.1 Wetland Context Determination ...................................................................................... 45 6.2. Aerial Photograph Interpretation ..................................................................................... 45 6.3 Terrain Unit Indicator ...................................................................................................... 45 6.4 Soil Form and Soil Wetness Indicators ........................................................................... 45 6.5 Vegetation Indicator ........................................................................................................ 45 6.6 Artificial Modifiers and Altered Hydrological Drivers ........................................................ 46 7. WETLAND INVESTIGATION RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ................................................ 46 7.1 Wetland Context ............................................................................................................. 46 7.2 Aerial Photograph Interpretation ..................................................................................... 46 7.2.1 Historical Aerial Photographs ................................................................................... 46 7.2.2 Google Earth Images ............................................................................................... 50 7.3 Terrain Unit Indicator ...................................................................................................... 54 7.4 Soil Form and Soil Wetness Indicators (Site Survey) ...................................................... 55 7.5 Artificial Modifiers and Altered Hydrological Drivers .......................................................
Recommended publications
  • 2018/19 Opex Adjustment Budget
    COJ : COUNCIL 2019-01-29 COJ : MAYORAL COMMITTEE 2019-01-23 COJ : GOVERNANCE SUB-MAYORAL COMMITTEE GROUP FINANCE DEPARTMENT (GROUP ACCOUNTING) ADJUSTMENT CAPITAL BUDGET FOR THE 2018/19 FINANCIAL YEAR 1. STRATEGIC THRUST Well managed and governed city. 2. OBJECTIVE To obtain approval for the adjustment of the Medium-Term Capital Budget for the 2018/19 - 2020/21 financial years. 3. SUMMARY In terms of Section 28 of the Municipal Finance Management Act 56 of 2003 (MFMA), a municipality may revise an approved budget through an adjustments budget. Only the Mayor may table an adjustments budget in the municipal council and may only be tabled within prescribed limitations as to timing or frequency. In terms of section 28 of the Municipal Finance Management Act, an adjustment budget, amongst others: a) Must adjust the revenue and expenditure estimates downwards if there is material under-collection of revenue during the current year; b) May appropriate additional revenues that have become available over and above those anticipated in the annual budget, but only to revise or accelerate spending programmes already budgeted for; c) May, within a prescribed framework, authorise unforeseeable and unavoidable expenditure recommended by the mayor of the municipality; d) May authorise the utilisation of projected savings in one vote towards spending under another vote; e) May correct any errors in the annual budget; and f) May provide for any other expenditure within a prescribed framework. In terms of the Municipal Budget and Reporting Regulations, only one adjustment budget may be tabled in Council during the financial year, after tabling of the mid–year budget and performance assessment, but not later than 28 February.
    [Show full text]
  • Normal Template
    Green Bonds Investor Report Prepared by ERM on behalf of the City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality December 2015 ERM Reference: 0291709 This report has been prepared by Environmental Resources Managementwww.erm.com the trading name of Environmental Resources Management Southern Africa (Pty) Limited, with all reasonable skill, care and diligence within the terms of the Contract with the client, incorporating our General Terms and Conditions of Business and taking account of the resources devoted to it by agreement with the City of Johannesburg. We disclaim any responsibility to the City of Johannesburg and others in respect of any matters outside the scope of this report. The world’s leading sustainability consultancy CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 2 INTRODUCTION 4 2.1 PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT 4 2.2 DEFINITION: GREEN BONDS 4 2.3 COJ’S GREEN BOND 5 2.3.1 Use of the Proceeds 5 2.3.2 Process for Project Evaluation 6 2.3.3 Alignment with Other Initiatives 10 3 PROJECT PORTFOLIO 11 4 REPORTING 18 4.1 ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATORS 18 5 CONCLUSION 27 6 SOURCES 28 ERM ON BEHALF OF COJ GREEN BOND INVESTOR REPORT 2 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This document aims to provide a harmonised framework for impact reporting on projects in Johannesburg, South Africa, to which Green Bond proceeds have been allocated. Performance data has been provided for selected Green Bond projects for the reporting period 2013/14 pointing to the environmental benefit associated with each project. The City of Johannesburg has committed to reporting on the progress of projects benefitting from the Green Bond towards their environmental objectives on an annual basis to the Green Bond investors.
    [Show full text]
  • Provincial Gazette Provinsiale Koerant
    T ~ ...... ~ ., .,..,~ r _I.JVIIVI.,~-- I.J~ ... .I1~ .. _LIVIIV':-'I~- v IoI.IV ,--__. \..I ------- I';; ;IV~ ,---__. \..I ------- I &;;IV~ Provincial Gazette Provinsiale Koerant Selling price • Verkoopprys: R2.50 Other countries • Buitelands: R3.25 PRETORIA Vol. 27 6 JANUARY 2021 No_1 6 JANUARIE 2021 2 No.1 PROVINCIAL GAZETTE, 6 JANUARY 2021 PROVINSIALE KOERANT, 6 JANUARIE 2021 No.1 3 CONTENTS Gazette Page No. No. GENERAL NOTICES' ALGEMENE KENNISGEWINGS City of Johannesburg Municipal Planning By-law, 2016: Portions 95,96 and 97 or Erf 711, Township C~g~I~~ ..................................................................................................................................................... 15 2 Mogale City Spatial Planning and Land Use Management By-Law, 2018: Erf 17730, Kagiso Extention 13 ..... 16 3 The City of Johannesburg Municipal Planning By-Law, 2016: Linbro Park Extension 209 ............................... 17 4 City of Johannesburg Municipal Planning By-Law, 2016: Erven 989, Remainder and Portion 1 of 990, 991, 992, 994 and 996, Kensington ............................................................................................................................ 18 5 City of Johannesburg Municipal Planning By-Law, 2016: Erf 4956, Johannesburg .......................................... 19 6 City of Johannesburg Municipal Planning By-Law, 2016: Erf 514, Parkwood ................................................... 20 7 City of Johannesburg Municipal Planning By-Law, 2016: Holding 52, Modderfontein AH ...............................
    [Show full text]
  • 136 22-5-2013 Gaut Layout 1
    T E U N THE PROVINCE OF A DIE PROVINSIE G THE PGROVINCEAUTENG OF G DIEGAUTENGPROVINSIE UNITY DIVERSITY GAUTENG P IN GAUTENG R T O N V E IN M C RN IAL GOVE Provincial Gazette Provinsiale Koerant MAY PRETORIA, 22 2013 Vol. 19 MEI No. 136 Ule ail bovv s the pow 's; to prevent APOS (-WS HER!NE 0800 012 322 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Prevention is the cure N.B. The Government Printing Works will not be held responsible for the quality of “Hard Copies” or “Electronic Files” submitted for publication purposes 302035—A 136—1 2 No. 136 PROVINCIAL GAZETTE, 22 MAY 2013 IMPORTANT NOTICE The Government Printing Works will not be held responsible for faxed documents not received due to errors on the fax machine or faxes received which are unclear or incomplete. Please be advised that an “OK” slip, received from a fax machine, will not be accepted as proof that documents were received by the GPW for printing. If documents are faxed to the GPW it will be the senderʼs respon- sibility to phone and confirm that the documents were received in good order. Furthermore the Government Printing Works will also not be held responsible for cancellations and amendments which have not been done on original documents received from clients. WHEN SUBMITTING NOTICES FOR PUBLICATION, PLEASE TAKE NOTE OF THE NEW FAX NUMBERS ON PAGE 5 CONTENTS Page Gazette No. No. No. GENERAL NOTICES 1154 Gauteng Removal of Restrictions Act (3/1996): Portion 26, Diepkloof 319-IQ.............................................................. 10 136 1155 do.: Erf 371, Sinoville....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2020/21 Integrated Development Plan Review
    2020/21 INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW 2 An agile and resilient metropolitan government that is people centred 2020/21 INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW Our commitment The City of Johannesburg; in the interest of impacting positively on the city and the lives of all who live in it, commits itself to: Adding value by being action-oriented in our engagements; being better informed; responding to the city’s challenges in a visible and proactive manner Being committed civil servants, ready to serve the people of Joburg through sustainable, high- impact interventions that lead to accelerated economic growth for the city and the country (serving as “change makers”/ disrupters”) Ensuring we maintain the future focus of the National Development Plan (NDP), Growing Gauteng Together (GGT) 2030, and the Joburg 2040 Growth and Development Strategy ( GDS) at the core of all we do – delivering with professionalism, customer centricity, effective internal decision making, alignment with King IV principles, and a focus on supporting economic activity and using modern communication channels to improve accountability to communities Being productive – contributing to a productive City Ensuring synergised service delivery with authentic impact – countering a context of a trust deficit, service delivery breakdowns, incoherent links across the City, delivery on a ‘just in time’ principle, a lack of standardisation of how we operate, and inconsistent outcomes inspirational human capital management – focusing on improving staff morale, efficient service
    [Show full text]
  • Alfred Vivi Ngwenya
    THE STATIC AND DYNAMIC ELEMENTS OF TSOTSITAAL WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO ZULU - A SOCIOLINGUISTIC RESEARCH by ALFRED VIVI NGWENYA • Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in the subject AFRICAN LANGUAGES at the UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA Supervisor: Professor C.T. Msimang Joint Supervisor: Professor R. Finlayson Date submitted: NOVEMBER 1995 I TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Declaration v Acknowledgement VI Summary VII Chapter 1 The static and dynamic elements of tsotsitaal 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Aim and scope of study 2 1.2.1 Aim of study 2 1.2.2 Scope of study 3 1 . 3 Approach 3 1.3.1 Qualitative research approach 3 1.3.2 Msimang's views 4 1.3.3 Schuring's views 4 1.4 Quantitative research approach 5 1.4.1 Research methodology 6 1.4.2 Interviews 6 1.4.3 Questionnaires 6 1.4.4 Analysis of data 7 1.5 Definition of terms 7 1.5.1 "Static" defined 7 1.5.2 The static element of tsotsitaal 7 1.5.3 Reasons for the static element of tsotsi taal 8 1. 5 .4 "Dynamic" defined 8 1. 5. 5 The dynamic element of tsotsitaal 9 1. 5. 6 Reasons for the dynamic element of tsotsi­ taal 10 1. 5. 7 "Element" defined 11 1. 6 Speech community 11 1:6.1 Tsotsi community 12 1. 6 .2 "Tsotsitaal" defined 13 1. 6. 3 The commencement of tsotsitaal 14 1. 6 .4 Afrikaans as the base of tsotsitaal 15 II 1.6.5 The new trend in the base language 16 1.6.6 Tsotsitaal in different areas 18 1.7 Summary 18 Chapter 2 The static and dynamic elements of tsotsitaal and its relationship to colloquial Zulu and slang 2.1 Introduction 19 2.2 Tsotsitaal and
    [Show full text]
  • WHO WE ARE Vision Mission Values
    C. THE DEPOTS 1.Southdale 011 681 7800 WHO WE ARE 91 Side Road Southdale Johannesburg Water SOC Ltd (JW) is a municipal entity incorporated on 21 November 2000 and commenced business on 1 January 2001 as an independent company, with the City of Johannesburg 2. Langlaagte (CoJ) as its sole shareholder. JW was formed following the iGoli 2002 Transformation Plan, an initiative 011 473 9500 led by the former Greater Johannesburg Metropolitan Council. A. HEAD OFFICE 2 Link Road Langlaagte Switchboard • Region A: Midrand/Ivory Park/Diepsloot/Kya Sand 011 688 1400 3. Midrand • Region B: Rosebank/Randburg/Emmarentia/Greenside/Melville/Northcliff/Parktown 011 205 9500 • Region C: Roodepoort/Constantia Kloof/Northgate Customer Care (Internal) 621-6TH Road • Region D: Doornkop/Dobsonville/Protea Glen 011 688 1699 (Corner New Road) • Region E: Alexandra/Wynberg/Sandton (to report leaks, burst pipes Erand, Midrand • Region G: Orange Farm/Ennerdale/Lenasia and sewer blockages) 4. Zandfontein Johannesburg Water’s infrastructure assets in support of its business comprise: B. WASTE WATER 011 386 1000 TREATMENT WORKS 5 Commerce Crescent West • 89 Water Reservoirs Kramerville - Sandton • 28 Water Towers 1. Bushkoppie • 10 Depots 010 230 0003 5. Ennerdale • 4 Laboratories Cnr Golden Highway R553 011 213 2700 • 11 896 km distribution pipes and Stockwell Avenue 2 James Street • 6 Wastewater Treatment Works Eldorado Estates Ennerdale Ext. 1 6. Hamberg The entity supplies 1.4 million domestic, commercial and industrial customers and serves an estimated 2. Ennerdale 010 230 0003 011 831 1141 consumer base of 4.5 million people with approximately 1,574 ml/day and treats it to acceptable.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Development Plan (IDP) 2019/20 Review
    INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2019/20 REVIEW Advancing Diphetogo CITY OF JOHANNESBURG IDP 2019/20 REVIEW Table of Contents Table of Contents ................................................................................................................ 1 List of Figures ..................................................................................................................... 4 Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................................ 5 Johannesburg today ........................................................................................................... 7 Vision, Mission and Values Proposition ............................................................................ 8 Vision ............................................................................................................................. 8 Mission .......................................................................................................................... 8 Five Growth and Development Outcomes ...................................................................... 8 Nine Strategic Priorities ................................................................................................. 8 Message from the Executive Mayor ................................................................................... 9 Message from the City Manager ...................................................................................... 10 Introduction to the 2019/20 IDP Review ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • City of Johannesburg Ward Councillors by Region, Suburbs and Political Party
    CITY OF JOHANNESBURG WARD COUNCILLORS BY REGION, SUBURBS AND POLITICAL PARTY No. Councillor Name/Surname & Par Region: Ward Ward Suburbs: Ward Administrator: Cotact Details: ty: No: 1. Cllr. Msingathi Mazibukwana ANC G 1 Streford 5,6,7,8 and 9 Phase 1, Bongani Dlamini 078 248 0981 2 and 3 082 553 7672 011 850 1008 011 850 1097 [email protected] 2. Cllr. Dimakatso Jeanette Ramafikeng ANC G 2 Lakeside 1,2,3 and 5 Mzwanele Dloboyi 074 574 4774 Orange Farm Ext.1 part of 011 850 1071 011 850 116 083 406 9643 3. Cllr. Lucky Mbuso ANC G 3 Orange Farm Proper Ext 4, 6 Bongani Dlamini 082 550 4965 and 7 082 553 7672 011 850 1073 011 850 1097 4. Cllr. Simon Mlekeleli Motha ANC G 4 Orange Farm Ext 2,8 & 9 Mzwanele Dloboyi 082 550 4965 Drieziek 1 011 850 1071 011 850 1073 Drieziek Part 4 083 406 9643 [email protected] 5. Cllr. Penny Martha Mphole ANC G 5 Dreziek 1,2,3,5 and 6 Mzwanele Dloboyi 082 834 5352 Poortjie 011 850 1071 011 850 1068 Streford Ext 7 part 083 406 9643 [email protected] Stretford Ext 8 part Kapok Drieziek Proper 6. Shirley Nepfumbada ANC G 6 Kanama park (weilers farm) Bongani Dlamini 076 553 9543 Finetown block 1,2,3 and 5 082 553 7672 010 230 0068 Thulamntwana 011 850 1097 Mountain view 7. Danny Netnow DA G 7 Ennerdale 1,3,6,10,11,12,13 Mzwanele Dloboyi 011 211-0670 and 14 011 850 1071 078 665 5186 Mid – Ennerdale 083 406 9643 [email protected] Finetown Block 4 and 5 (part) Finetown East ( part) Finetown North Meriting 8.
    [Show full text]
  • AUCTION 24 February 2016 Summer Place, 69 Melville Road, Hyde Park HIGH STREET TV
    APPRECIATING PROPERTY VALUE NAA GLOBAL WINNERS AUCTION 24 February 2016 Summer Place, 69 Melville Road, Hyde Park HIGH STREET TV HIGH STREET The High St Auction Co. uses its own online TV channel where it presents: • Live coverage of our premier auction events • Comprehensive coverage of our featured properties in advance of the auction event • Highlights packages of past auction events High St TV is fully interactive and allows you to communicate with us while you’re watching. We look forward to our interactive dialogue about selling and buying property via auction on this exciting platform. High St TV is accessible via link to our dedicated TV webpage on our website and the technology will allow access via: • www.highstreetauctions.com • Twitter • Tablets and Smart phones • Linkedin • On Facebook • Youtube The leading technology solution we employed allows for high quality streaming across South Africa and all around the world. We have used multiple cameras and multimedia integration at the auction event in order to provide a dynamic and world class online experience to our viewers. If you can’t join us at our premier auction events on auction day then don’t miss our online coverage. To feature your property on High St TV please contact one of our sales representatives. NAA GLOBAL WINNERS Wednesday 24 February 2016 @ 12pm Welcome to today’s premier auction event Today you will be hosted by our Lead Auctioneer Joff van Reenen. Should you require any assistance, please feel free to approach any of our representatives. Please acquaint yourself with the rules of auction which are available on our website: www.highstreetauctions.com/auction-info-high-street-auctions.php#rules.
    [Show full text]
  • SA Corporate June 2017 Interim Results Presentation Final
    SA Corporate June 2017 Interim Results Presentation August 2017 Agenda • Highlights Rory Mackey • Financial Performance Antoinette Basson • South African Portfolio Review Rory Mackey • Unlocking Value in the Retail Portfolio Rory Mackey • Re-Inventing C&I Rory Mackey • Zambian Portfolio Performance Rory Mackey • Building the Afhco Business Rory Mackey • Storage Genie Rory Mackey • Strategy & Prospects Rory Mackey • Acknowledgments Rory Mackey • Questions Team 2 HIGHLIGHTS RORY MACKEY 3 High Level Review • Distribution Themes • Anticipated weaker H1 vs 2017 FY together with challenging economic conditions • H1 2017 distribution growth of 4.4% higher than June 2016 • NPI growth of 13.8%; LFL increasing by 4.1%; acquisitions contributed 8.3% • Industrial portfolio - strong retentions (82.1%); low vacancies (1.6%); LFL NPI growth of 4.0% • Retail portfolio NPI growth of 19.7%; LFL increasing by 6.0%; strong retentions of 92.0%; positive reversions of 6.6% and escalations of 7.6% • Decisive interventions in the Afhco portfolio to address challenges in the Joburg inner-city residential portfolio to position for future sustainable growth; Afhco LFL NPI growth of 4.2% • Commercial LFL NPI declined by 0.5%; reduction in exposure decreased vacancies to 6.7% • Investment Strategy • Executed acquisitions and pipeline increased to R3.2bn • Executed & contracted disposals of R746m; R312m in addition to those reported at end February 17 • Developments in progress outstanding expenditure of R813m in completing retail, industrial and residential redevelopments
    [Show full text]
  • Randburg Main Seat of Johannesburg North Magisterial District
    # # !C # # # # # ^ !C # !.!C# # # # !C # # # # # # # # # # !C^ # # # # # ^ # # # # ^ !C # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C# # # !C!C # # # # # # # # # #!C # # # # # !C# # # # # # !C ^ # # # # # # # # ^ # # # !C # # # # # # # !C # #^ # # # # # # # # # # #!C # # # # # # # !C # # # # # !C # # # # # # # # !C # !C # # # # # # # ^ # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #!C # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # !C # # # # # # # # # !C # # # # # # # # # # !C # # # # # # # # # # !C# # # ^ # # # !C # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #!C # # # # # # # ^ # # !C # !C# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #!C ^ # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C !C # # # # # # # # !C# # # ##!C # # # # # !C # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C # # # ^ # # # # # # ^ # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C # # # # !C # #!C # # # # # # # #!C # # # # # # !C ## # # # # # # # # # !C # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C # # # # # # # # # # ### # # !C !C # # # # # !C # # ## ## !C # # !C # !. # # # # # # # # # # # # # # !C # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ^ # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # !C # # # # ^ # # # # # # # !C # # # # # # # # ## ## # # # # # # # # !C !C## # # # # # # # !C # # # # !C# # # # # # # !C # !C # # # # # # ^ # # # !C # ^ # !C # ## # # !C #!C # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # ## # !C # # # # # # # # # # # # # #!C # # # #
    [Show full text]