DOCSLIB.ORG

Election-Integrity-Manual.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Election-Integrity-Manual.Pdf 1 ensuring the integrity of our electoral system Table of Contents 2 Introduction by Anita MonCrief 3 Voter Fraud 101 4 Election Protection, Laws and Universal Voter Registration 5 Voter ID 6 Voter Registration 7 How to Run a Voter Registration Drive in your State 8 Frequently Asked Questions 10 From Voter Registration to Voter Turnout 12 Citizen-Led Initiatives 12 Election Administration 13 Election Day Operations 15 ACORN and Project Vote 16 Voter Fraud 21 The Voter Fraud App 22 American Majority Overview and Resources 22 Connecting with American Majority 22 Additional Election Integrity Resources 2 My name is Anita MonCrief and I’ve been referred to as the “ACORN whistleblower.”” I joined the staff of ACORN affiliate Project Vote’s development department in 2005. Working with grassroots organizers across the country, we funded one of the largest voter registration drives in United States history. However, I began to notice ACORN’s practice of poorly training employees and sometimes covertly encouraging people to skirt the rules during voter registration programs. After working on voter fraud research for ACORN, I saw a pattern of employees being prosecuted for shenanigans during election years. I decided to take action and since 2008, I have been educating citizens on how to protect the integrity of our electoral system. American Majority’s Election Integrity course focuses on voter registration, voter fraud, Election Day operations and get-out-the- vote activities. Our goal is to prepare liberty-minded activists for the tactics of groups like ACORN. As citizens begin to peel back the layers on the groups working in their community, there is a need for educational materials that can be shared and utilized. Despite rumors of its demise, ACORN is still thriving and so are its over 300 affiliated organizations. Project Vote, ACORN’s voter registration arm will once again attempt to run the largest grassroots voter registration program during the 2012 elections. With organizations like Organizing for America, Emily’s List, SEIU and Planned Parenthood, partnering with Project Vote, the stakes couldn’t be higher. In 2008, Project Vote had a budget of over 28 million dollars (no where near the modest budgets of most liberty- minded organizations) and one can only imagine how much will be spent to keep President Obama in office. In this environment of lawlessness the people must stand up and protect the integrity of our electoral system. This guide can only begin to scratch the surface of everything involved in election integrity, but I hope it serves as an introduction to this critically important topic. We have seen what some are capable of doing in order to gain political power and now it is up to the citizens to educate them and demand that everyone uphold our electoral laws. For liberty, Anita MonCrief 3 Voter Fraud 101 Maybe you’ve read about Al Capone’s infamous “vote early and vote often” motto, back when he (not Obama or Rahm Emanuel) ran Chicago’s political machine. It wasn’t uncommon then for entire ethnic blocs (plus every name in a graveyard) to pull the lever the way the crime boss wanted. And maybe you know how, when asked by reporters about the massive fraud in the 1960 Presidential election, Richard Nixon calmly replied “they stole it fair and square”. Nixon knew JFK and LBJ had teamed up to once again use that Chicago machine, this time not only rigging it, but also combining it with Texas. Fast forward to campaigns of the last few years. Who can forget the counting and recounting that took place in Florida in 2000? Keeping the spotlight on ballot boxes, and making sure they never went to an off-camera, private room to be sorted was the name of the game (along with “hanging chads”) then. Since then, it’s gotten even worse. “Motor-voter” laws, the Help America Vote Act (HAVA), and the manufactured-by-the-media controversy in having citizens (much less felons) show identification to cast a vote are now lightning rod issues every cycle. So is the novel idea of actually requiring college students (often out-of-state) to choose between campus and home (not both) to decide where they’ll vote. Now, every two years, both parties have to dispatch scores of specially trained attorneys and poll watchers to guard against these and many other forms of voter disenfranchisement (negating the votes of a community by committing fraud). VOTE EARLY You’ve heard it all. But the bits and pieces never seem to VOTE paint the whole picture. OFTEN There are reports of judges keeping polling places open well into the night in one-party- controlled places. Voter rolls that include the entire Dallas Cowboys roster. And of course, taxpayer-paid ACORN employees engaging (and getting caught) in enormous registration illegalities, as well as armed Black Panthers at polling places, blocking entry and access via voter intimidation. You see all this. And you want to know what you can do. Which is why we’ve put together this manual: so you can educate yourself about the laws and regulations regarding registering and turning out voters. And we’ve done it with the expert help of Anita Moncrief, an ex-ACORN employee and whistleblower who spends her time explaining how the Left undermines the democratic process. So that you, like Katherine Engelbrecht, a mother, wife and small businesswoman, can be empowered enough to start your own group of citizens concerned with making sure elections are conducted properly and fairly. Katherine and her “True the Vote” group operating out of Houston, Texas have now spread their techniques and knowledge to hundreds of other groups nationwide in preparation for the next spate of elections, both local or state and federal. Get ready to read some wild stuff. These real-life stories of “it couldn’t happen here” will astound and outrage you. But when you, the grassroots activist, have absorbed the truth and rules about voter fraud, you’ll be the best weapon for its prevention that there is. 4 Election Protection, Laws and Universal Voter Registration Help America Vote Act of 2002 at the same time that they apply for a driver’s license “The Help America Vote Act or seek to renew a driver’s license, and requires the (Pub.L. 107-252), or HAVA, is a State to forward the completed application to the United States federal law which appropriate state of local election official. Section 7 was signed into law by President of the Act requires states to offer voter registration Bush in 2002. Drafted in reaction to the controversy opportunities at all offices that provide public surrounding the 2000 U.S. presidential election, assistance and all offices that provide state-funded HAVA mandates that all states and localities upgrade programs primarily engaged in providing services to many aspects of their election procedures, including persons with disabilities. Each applicant for any of their voting machines, registration processes and poll these services, renewal of services, or address changes worker training” must be provided with a voter registration form of a declination form as well as assistance in completing the [Source: http://www.fec.gov/hava/hava.htm, http://en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/Help_America_Vote_Act] form and forwarding the completed application to the appropriate state or local election official. HAVA and Provisional Voting [Source: NVRA: Department of Justice Civil Rights Division Home Page A provisional ballot is used to record a vote when there http://bit.ly/dlwYnZ] is some question in regards to a given voter’s eligibility. Universal Voter Registration A provisional ballot would be cast when: According to some voting rights advocates: “The The voter refuses to show a photo ID (in regions that government should not only facilitate registration; it require one) should actively register adults who are eligible to vote as part of its responsibility to have accurate rolls. The The voter’s name does not appear on the electoral roll most comprehensive way to move toward universal for the given precinct. voter registration is to establish federal standards that The voter’s registration contains inaccurate or out- states must follow to ensure all eligible voters are on dated information such as the wrong address or a their states’ voter roll.” misspelled name. [Source: http://www.fairvote.org/why-universal-registration, American Thinker: http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/01/what_the_dems_ The voter’s ballot has already been recorded know_universal_v.html] Whether a provisional ballot is counted is contingent “John Fund described the Democrat plan, ‘The feds upon the verification of that voter’s eligibility. Many will tell the states: ‘take everyone on every list of voters do not realize that the provisional ballot is not welfare that you have, take everyone on every list of counted until 7-10 days after election so their vote unemployed you have, take everyone on every list of does not affect the calling of the states to different property owners, candidates. take everyone [Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provisional_ballot] on every list of National Voter Registration Act driver’s license Congress enacted the National Voter Registration Act holders and of 1993 (also known as the “NVRA” and the “Motor register them to Voter Act”), to make it easier for all Americans to vote regardless register to vote and to maintain their registration. of whether they Section 5 of the Act requires states to provide want to be ..’ individuals with the opportunity to register to vote 5 Voter ID First-Time Voters The federal Help America Vote Act (HAVA) mandates that all states require identification from first-time voters who registered to vote by mail and did not provide verification of their identification with their mail-in voter registration.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Tea Party Movement and Entelechy: an Inductive Study of Tea Party Rhetoric By
    The Tea Party Movement and Entelechy: an Inductive Study of Tea Party Rhetoric By John Leyland Price M.A., Central Michigan University, 2013 B.S.B.A., Central Michigan University, 2010 Submitted to the graduate degree program in Communication Studies and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Chair: Dr. Robert C. Rowland Dr. Beth Innocenti Dr. Brett Bricker Dr. Scott Harris Dr. Wayne Sailor Date Defended: 5 September 2019 ii The dissertation committee for John Leyland Price certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: The Tea Party Movement and Entelechy: an Inductive Study of Tea Party Rhetoric Chair: Dr. Robert C. Rowland Date Approved: 5 September 7 2019 iii Abstract On February 19, 2009, CNBC journalist Rick Santelli’s fiery outburst against the Obama Administration on national television gave the Tea Party Movement (TPM) its namesake. Soon after rallies were organized across the U.S. under the Tea Party banner. From its inception in 2009, the TPM became an essential player in U.S. politics and pivotal in flipping control of the Senate and House to the Republican Party during the 2010 midterm elections. The movement faced controversy on both sides of the political spectrum for its beliefs and fervent stance against compromising with political adversaries. Researchers argued that the TPM was an example of Richard Hofstadter’s Paranoid Style. Others claimed that the movement’s rhetoric, member demographics, and political success demonstrated it was outside the boundaries of the Paranoid Style.
    [Show full text]
  • The Public Eye, Summer 2011
    Tea Party, p. 3 TheA PUBLICATION OF POLITICAL R PublicEyeESEARCH ASSOCIATES Summer 2011 • Volume XXVI, No.2 Arizona’s Anti- Immigrant Law SB1070 Where Did It Come From, Where Is It Going? By Lauri Lebo isericordia .The word washes across Mthe congregation at the tiny church, carried by voices singing in Spanish. Mercy. b Young girls, their long, shiny black hair u h S covered in sheer white doilies, sit close to n e l l E each other in the pews at Surprise Apos - © tolic Assembly in suburban Phoenix, Ari - Boston demonstrators support Wisconsin public employees, February 2011 zona, chattering and giggling into their hands. Mothers and grandmothers, their hair covered in scarves of black lace, lean over and gently shush them. A handsome The Attack on Unions young man with baby-smooth skin and Right-Wing Politics and Democratic Possibilities glistening hair neatly parted at the side steps forward to the pulpit. Steve Montenegro, By Abby Scher servatives what they could do once they the youth minister, beckons to the con - The November 2010 Republican were in charge: how deeply they could cut gregation’s children, who gather at his Sweep government, and how successfully they feet. He praises the little ones for their inno - ore than a million people watched on could go after union “bosses,” even with a cence as their mothers snap photos from MYoutube as New Jersey Governor Democratic legislature. Elected only in the pews. Chris Christie sneered at a public school 2009, Christie quickly became an inspi - Steve’s father, José Roberto Montene - teacher who had the temerity to ask him at ration for the Right, as he went full throt - gro, the church’s pastor, delivers the sermon tle in blaming unions for the grossly a September 2010 town meeting how his SB1070 continues on page 12 policies would help the middle class when underfunded state pension system and the $11 billion deficit he inherited.
    [Show full text]
  • Neoconservatism Hoover Press : Berkowitz/Conservative Hberkc Ch5 Mp 104 Rev1 Page 104 Hoover Press : Berkowitz/Conservative Hberkc Ch5 Mp 105 Rev1 Page 105
    Hoover Press : Berkowitz/Conservative hberkc ch5 Mp_103 rev1 page 103 part iii Neoconservatism Hoover Press : Berkowitz/Conservative hberkc ch5 Mp_104 rev1 page 104 Hoover Press : Berkowitz/Conservative hberkc ch5 Mp_105 rev1 page 105 chapter five The Neoconservative Journey Jacob Heilbrunn The Neoconservative Conspiracy The longer the United States struggles to impose order in postwar Iraq, the harsher indictments of the George W. Bush administration’s foreign policy are becoming. “Acquiring additional burdens by engag- ing in new wars of liberation is the last thing the United States needs,” declared one Bush critic in Foreign Affairs. “The principal problem is the mistaken belief that democracy is a talisman for all the world’s ills, and that the United States has a responsibility to promote dem- ocratic government wherever in the world it is lacking.”1 Does this sound like a Democratic pundit bashing Bush for par- tisan gain? Quite the contrary. The swipe came from Dimitri Simes, president of the Nixon Center and copublisher of National Interest. Simes is not alone in calling on the administration to reclaim the party’s pre-Reagan heritage—to abandon the moralistic, Wilsonian, neoconservative dream of exporting democracy and return to a more limited and realistic foreign policy that avoids the pitfalls of Iraq. 1. Dimitri K. Simes, “America’s Imperial Dilemma,” Foreign Affairs (Novem- ber/December 2003): 97, 100. Hoover Press : Berkowitz/Conservative hberkc ch5 Mp_106 rev1 page 106 106 jacob heilbrunn In fact, critics on the Left and Right are remarkably united in their assessment of the administration. Both believe a neoconservative cabal has hijacked the administration’s foreign policy and has now overplayed its hand.
    [Show full text]
  • At Least 75 Conservative Organizations—Several of Which
    At Least 75 Conservative Organizations—Several Of Which Have Opposed Pandemic Aid And Government Spending For Others—Took Nearly $20 Million In Funds Meant For Small Businesses. DOUBLE-DIPPING: At Least 14 Of These Organizations Also Took Money Under The Enhanced Economic Injury Disaster Loan Program. SUMMARY: An Accountable.US analysis of new data from Trump’s Small Business Administration shows at least 75 conservative organizations—including several that have vocally advocated against pandemic aid— took nearly $20 million in pandemic aid meant for struggling small businesses. Most egregiously, at least 14 of these 75 conservative organizations also took money under a second government aid fund, the Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) program. Of the 75 organizations Accountable.US identified, roughly half took PPP funds valued at less than $150,000, meaning their identities were only recently revealed following a lawsuit. Among these organizations are: • Center for Urban Renewal and Education, Council for National Policy, and Leadership Institute Inc, each “double-dipped” – receiving both PPP and EIDL assistance - and were part of a group of eight conservative organizations that took aid totaling $2,281,075 despite signing a May 2020 letter led by the Conservative Action Project in opposition to federal aid to state and local governments amid the COVID-19 crisis. • American Majority and its action arm took $130,400 combined despite organizing the “largest single-day conservative grassroots training initiative in history” in September 2011. American Majority hosted training sessions across the country to “educate and mobilize fiscally conservative activists and future candidates to fight for limited government and free market principles.” • The Remembrance Project took $75,000 under EIDL and $15,600 under PPP.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 113 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 113 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 159 WASHINGTON, SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2013 No. 131 Senate The Senate was not in session today. Its next meeting will be held on Monday, September 30, 2013, at 2 p.m. House of Representatives SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2013 The House met at 10 a.m. and was sion by the Republicans in the House fact, isn’t it ironic that having cam- called to order by the Speaker pro tem- about the next step to deal with the paigned against these health care sav- pore (Mr. STEWART). fiscal crisis they have created. ings and losing, PAUL RYAN and the Re- f It is not really that complicated. The publicans include those very savings in Monday deadline approaches to con- their budget? DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO tinue the operation of the Federal Gov- My Republican friends are paralyzed TEMPORE ernment with a shutdown looming be- in part because they’ve adopted a dra- The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- cause the Republicans have refused to conian budget that actually requires fore the House the following commu- work on a bipartisan basis to resolve savings in the very health plan they nication from the Speaker: the funding issues. want to defund. They claim to want to WASHINGTON, DC, The centerpiece of their rhetoric has reduce government spending; yet they September 28, 2013. been objection to the Affordable Care have refused to allow the House to vote I hereby appoint the Honorable CHRIS Act and their childish insistence that a on the spending bills their budget calls STEWART to act as Speaker pro tempore on program that has been approved by for.
    [Show full text]
  • This Table Was Published on 4/3/15. Amount PAC Independent
    This table was published on 4/3/15. Independent Expenditure Table 1* Independent Expenditure Totals by Committee and Filer Type January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2014 Independent Expenditure (IE) Totals by Committee and Filer Type Amount PAC Independent Expenditures** $48,829,678 Party Independent Expenditures $228,993,297 Independent Expenditure-Only Political Committees $339,402,611 Political Committees with Non-Contribution Accounts $2,573,469 Independent Expenditures Reported by Persons other than Political Committees $168,045,226 Total Independent Expenditures (IE) $787,844,281 ID # IEs by Political Action Committee (PAC)** Amount C00348540 1199 SERVICE EMPLOYEES INT'L UNION FEDERAL POLITICAL ACTION FUND $125,022 C00346015 80-20 NATIONAL ASIAN AMERICAN PAC $900 C00001461 ALASKA STATE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (ALPAC) $14,000 C00235861 ALLEN COUNTY RIGHT TO LIFE INC POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $1,914 C00493221 ALLEN WEST GUARDIAN FUND $1,364,476 C00359539 AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (SKINPAC)$48,706 C00411553 AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $50,000 C00196246 AMERICAN ACADEMY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY INC POLITICAL COMMITTEE (OPHTHPAC) $334,184 C00173153 AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSE ANESTHETISTS SEPARATE SEGREGATED FUND (CRNA-PAC)$150,402 C00343459 AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $1,167,715 C00382424 AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION PAC $200,000 C00011114 AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE COUNTY
    [Show full text]
  • A for the Period Beginning 01/01/2015 and Ending 06/30/2015
    A For the period beginning 01/01/2015 and ending 06/30/2015 B Check applicable box: ✔ Initial report Change of address Amended report Final report 1 Name of organization Employer identification number Republican State Leadership Committee - RSLC 05 - 0532524 2 Mailing address (P.O. box or number, street, and room or suite number) 1201 F Street NW SUITE 675 City or town, state, and ZIP code Washington, DC 20004 3 E-mail address of organization: 4 Date organization was formed: [email protected] 09/25/2002 5a Name of custodian of records 5b Custodian's address Staci A. Goede 1201 F Street NW SUITE 675 Washington, DC 20004 6a Name of contact person 6b Contact person's address Matthew C. Walter 1201 F Street NW SUITE 675 Washington, DC 20004 7 Business address of organization (if different from mailing address shown above). Number, street, and room or suite number 1201 F Street NW SUITE 675 City or town, state, and ZIP code Washington, DC 20004 8 Type of report (check only one box) First quarterly report Monthly report for the month of: (due by April 15) (due by the 20th day following the month shown above, except the Second quarterly report December report, which is due by January 31) (due by July 15) Pre-election report (due by the 12th or 15th day before the election) Third quarterly report (1) Type of election: (due by October 15) (2) Date of election: Year-end report (3) For the state of: (due by January 31) Post-general election report (due by the 30th day after general election) ✔ Mid-year report (Non-election (1) Date of election: year only-due by July 31) (2) For the state of: 9 Total amount of reported contributions (total from all attached Schedules A) ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Charities Fines History
    Exhibit A - Charities Fines History Included in the Secretary of State’s (SoS) December 4, 2019 letter to the House Legislative Oversight Committee (LOC). This information was provided in response to the following question in LOC’s November 15, 2019 letter to the SoS: “24. Please provide in an Excel document, a list of the administrative fines issued, including the type of fine, amount of fine, entity fined, and year in which the fine was issued, for each year, as far back to the initial passage of the Solicitation of Charitable Funds Act as readily available to the agency.1” In addition to providing the information in this document, SoS provided the following response: The agency is providing a list of fines from 2009 to present in Exhibit A, which is attached to this response. This data was pulled from the charities database launched in February 2009. 1 “Under the Solicitation of Charitable Funds Act, the maximum fine is $2,000.00 for each separate violation. Fines for certain filing violations are calculated at a rate of $10.00 per day late, not to exceed $2,000.00. These violations include late annual financial reports, late professional fundraiser violations, late contracts, and late joint financial reports. For these fines, the Division of Public Charities will send an initial Notice of Administrative Fine that notifies the recipient that the fine has begun accruing. Once the late filing is submitted or 200 days have passed (at which point the maximum fine of $2,000.00 is assessed), the Division of Public Charities will send a Notice of Administrative Fine Invoice.” See Secretary of State Charities, Investigations, and Trademarks presentation, slide 49 and testimony during October 28, 2019, meeting from Shannon Wiley, SoS General Counsel.
    [Show full text]
  • 15,000 Door Knocks AMA WI Release 2019
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE MEDIA CONTACT Matt Batzel, American Majority Action Mobile: (920)917-5860 E-mail: [email protected] Conservative Group’s Ground-Game Hits 15,000 Door Knocks American Majority Action Door Knocking Spurs Conservative Comeback April 3, 2019 – With a very tight margin in the Wisconsin Supreme Court Election, American Majority Action (AMA)’s 15,000 Door Knocks and 4,300 Door Conversations were critical to turning out the conservative vote. AMA focused on live voter contacts on targeted doors of voters in key Wisconsin communities. AMA’s ground game created a stir among voters in the Badger State as AMA staff and volunteers activated conservative voters. Matt Batzel, the Wisconsin-based National Executive Director of American Majority Action, said, “Wisconsin voters spoke loud and clear that they support the rule of law and want judges who will follow the Wisconsin Constitution. This victory signals a swing in momentum for conservatives as they prepare for 2020. Despite heavy outside spending on the airwaves, the conservative ground game was the driving force that sparked Hagedorn’s epic comeback. Doors are the gold standard of campaign tactics. Wisconsinites have been inundated with TV commercials and radio ads, robocalls and campaign mail pieces. While much attention is paid to the spending on the airwaves, those touches have fleeting impact. But a personal contact at the door with a friendly face makes a lasting impression. We found great reception on the doors to our message of the need to have judges who follow the rule of law.” Face-to-face conversations are the highest form of voter engagement and are shown to greatly increase election turnout.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tea Party Movement
    The Tea Party Movement: Grassroots Advocacy at its Finest, or Highly-Disguised Astroturfing? by Kassandra Zukowski A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts Approved November 2011 by the Graduate Supervisory Committee: Majia Holmer Nadesan Lindsey Mean Ramsey Eric Ramsey ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY December 2011 ABSTRACT Using models identified by communications scholars Herbert W. Simons and Charles J. Stewart, a rhetorical analysis was conducted on contemporary Tea Party Movement (TPM) artifacts in an attempt to gauge the movement's authenticity as it relates to grassroots advocacy versus astroturfing. The models provided a theoretical framework in which the functions of social movement leaders were analyzed, as well as the rhetorical phases of a movement. Additionally, the notions of advocacy and astroturfing were defined and the concepts compared and contrasted. Used in conjunction with one another the models provided a framework in which TPM artifacts could be analyzed. Analysis was conducted on the websites for the Tea Party Patriots and Tea Party Express, a one-month sample of Sarah Palin FaceBook posts, two speeches delivered by Michelle Bachmann, and finally one speech given by Palin. Examples for each of the necessary rhetorical components identified were found within TPM sources, thus leading to the conclusion that the TPM operates primarily as a grassroots advocacy movement. i TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER Page 1 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2017 Year - In- Review
    ANNUAL REPORT 2017 YEAR - IN- REVIEW LETTER FROM PRESIDENT NED RYUN It’s hard to believe it’s been 10 years since American Majority launched. Our Team has traveled thousands of miles, trained thousands of people, and yet there are many miles and trainings left to go before we get this country back on track. The Progressive Movement at the turn of the 20th century began as a state and local reform movement, rising from a very local level to the highest seats of power in Washington, DC. In the course of roughly 25 years, that state-based movement eventually changed our government, and in so doing, our society. We must undo the damage progressives have done for the last 100 years, but in order to do that we have to stay committed to change that rises at the local level to create a groundswell that brings national, generational change. That’s why I get excited about thousands of activists getting trained every year, with hundreds being specifically trained to run for state and local office. Every person trained causes a ripple effect that spreads, that brings change. So with the end of another year, and the beginning of a new one, we once again put our hands to the plow and commit to doing the right work–the real work–that brings lasting change. Keep America Free, NED RYUN CEO & Founder 2 AMERICAN MAJORITY | Annual Report 2017 WE ARE MAKING NEW LEADERS SOCIAL MEDIA IMPRINT Using engaging video paired with original content from AmericanMajority.org, we spread our Facebook reach to more than 21.3 million impressions, more than doubling engagement compared to the same period last year.
    [Show full text]
  • Entityname Filenumber 29TH & K ASSOCIATES LIMITED
    EntityName FileNumber 29TH & K ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP P01241 #1 BEAUTY SUPPLY OF GOOD HOPE, Inc. C00005109425 (BCDA) BATIBO CULTURAL AND DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION N00004779633 .6 SEARCH PARTNERS, LLC L00005098124 01:CONCEPT LLC L10053 03 A Street LLC L00005271298 1 800 COLLECT INC. C0000002484 1 ENTERPRISE, LLC L0000051884 1 of 7 N0000001364 10 RHODE ISLAND AVE NW L.L.C. L46307 100 BLACK MEN OF GREATER WASHINGTON, D.C. 963942 100 CHESAPEAKE STREET CONDO ASSOCIATION 801108 100 Steps LLC L00005197334 1000 CONNECTICUT AVENUE ASSOCIATES LLC L16445 1000 K L.L.C. L07473 1000 URBAN SCHOLARS N0000000885 10009 FIELDS ROAD, Inc. C00005089923 1001 16TH STREET LLC L0000053904 1001 H ST, LLC L00004736952 1001 K STREET ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 5403 1001 L STREET SE, L.L.C. L00004791217 1001 MONROE ST LLC L00005131482 1003 RHODE ISLAND LLC L0000051434 1004 Wireless L.L.C. L00005090583 1006 Webster LLC L00005308833 1007 8TH ST. N.E. LLC L43951 1007 Irving Street NE Partners LLC L00004811588 1007-1009 H STREET, NE LLC L35703 101 5th Street NE LLC L00004839607 101 STRATEGY PARTNERS LLC L36107 1010 MASS AVE NW #913 L.L.C. L00005296246 1010 MASSACHUSETTS AVENUE CONDOMINIUM UNIT OWNERS ASSOCIATION270238 1011 Otis Place L.L.C. L00004830580 1012 9th St. Builders LLC L00004675069 1012 Harvard Street LLC L00005084562 1013 17th Developers Inc. C00005247892 1013 O NW L.L.C. L00005164802 1015 18TH STREET HOLDINGS, LLC L00005293288 1015 18TH STREET OWNER, LLC L00005293319 1015 Euclid Street NW LLC L00004682594 1015 MANAGER Inc. 233863 1015 OB ASSOCIATES LLC L16586 1016 7TH STREET LLC L50342 1017 17th Place LLC L00005254835 1017 17TH PLACE PARTNERS LLC L00005301100 1019 17th Place NE Limited Liability Company L00005286819 1019 18th Developers Inc.
    [Show full text]