Biographies of Contributors 381
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Glenn Stevens: Inflation Targeting - a Decade of Australian Experience1
Glenn Stevens: Inflation targeting - a decade of Australian experience1 Address by Mr Glenn Stevens, Deputy Governor of the Reserve Bank of Australia, to South Australian Centre for Economic Studies April 2003 Economic Briefing, Adelaide, 10 April 2003. * * * It is a pleasure to be here in Adelaide to take part in this Economic Briefing. As the title of this address makes clear, I would like to look back over a decade of experience using an inflation target for monetary policy in Australia. Just a couple of weeks ago saw the tenth anniversary of a speech by Bernie Fraser, then Governor of the Reserve Bank, in which the outlines of our target can be seen.2 It was, admittedly, a tentative beginning – there was no drum roll, or breathless talk of a new era. A reasonably careful reading of that speech was (and is) needed to see the contours of the approach to monetary policy which was being developed, and the framework was not fully formalised until the 1996 Statement on the Conduct of Monetary Policy.3 It is perhaps for this reason that some commentators believe that inflation targeting in Australia in fact began much later. But those who were there at the time – as I was – saw the material in that and a couple of other speeches of the period as quite significant, in that it associated intent of policy with numerical objectives for inflation, even if only fairly broadly defined ones. The behaviour of policy over the ensuing years was, moreover, quite consistent with those ideas. Hence I remain happy to claim that inflation targeting in Australia began about ten years ago in the first half of 1993. -
Select List of Delegates Boao Forum for Asia Sydney Conference Government International/Regional Organizations Business
As of July 3, 2015 Select List of Delegates Boao Forum for Asia Sydney Conference Government Tony Abbott MP, Prime Minister of Australia Yasuo FUKUDA, Former Prime Minister, Japan Bob HAWKE, Former Prime Minister, Australia Jenny SHIPLEY, former Prime Minister, New Zealand Glenn STEVENS, Governor, Reserve Bank of Australia Bob CARR, Former Foreign Minister, Australia Mike BAIRD, Premier of NSW Wayne BYRES, Chairman, Australian Prudential Regulatory Authority Sally LOANE, CEO, Financial Services Council Greg MEDCRAFT, Chairman, Australian Securities and Investment Commission Zhang Xiaohui, Assistant Governor, People's Bank Of China Cai Esheng, Former Vice-Chairman, China Banking Regulatory Commission XU Shanda, Former Vice Minister, the PRC State Administration of Taxation Ian Johnston, Chief Executive, Dubai Financial Services Authority K C CHAN, Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury, Hong Kong Stuart Ayres MP, Minister for Trade, Tourism and Major Events Andrew Constance MP, Minister for Transport and Infrastructure Warren Truss MP, Deputy Prime Minister, for Infrastructure and Regional Development M. Jean-Etienne LEROUX, Regional Director, Transactions & Asset Management – Infrastructures Australia & Asia Pacific Jim BETTS, CEO Infrastructure NSW David Gall, Chief Risk Officer, National Australia Bank Ltd `former Australian Ambassador to China International/Regional Organizations Pascal LAMY, Former Director General, World Trade Organization ZHOU Wenzhong, Secretary General, Boao Forum for Asia Business MA Zehua, Chairman -
Cvii (7): 333–359
L.A. Paul [email protected] Appointments 2021–. Millstone Family Professor of Philosophy and Professor of Cognitive Science, Yale University. 2020–. Professor of Psychology (secondary appointment), Yale University. 2018–2020. Professor of Philosophy and Cognitive Science, Yale University. 2014–2018. Professorial Fellow, Arché Philosophical Research Centre, University of St Andrews. 2016–2018. Eugene Falk Distinguished Professor of Philosophy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. 2012–2016. Professor of Philosophy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. 2008–2012. Associate Professor of Philosophy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. 2007–2008. Associate Professor of Philosophy, University of Arizona. 2001–2007. Assistant Professor of Philosophy, University of Arizona. 2001–2005. Institute for Advanced Studies Research Fellow, Philosophy, Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University. 1999–2001. Assistant Professor of Philosophy, Yale University. Education Ph.D., 1999, Philosophy, Princeton University. M.A., 1996, Philosophy, Princeton University. M.A., 1996, Philosophy, Antioch University. B.A., 1990, Biology and Chemistry, Antioch College. Areas of Specialization: Metaphysics, Philosophy of Mind, Cognitive Science, Formal Epistemology, Philosophy of Science. 1 Publications Books In Progress. Who will I Become? (provisional title) Under contract with Farrar, Straus and Giroux. 2020. Was können wir wissen, bevor wir uns entscheiden?, German translation of “What you can’t expect when you’re expecting”, -
A 'New Era' for the Reserve Bank?
FEATURE A ‘NEW ERA’ FOR THE RESERVE BANK? Australia’s central bankers should face greater scrutiny and accountability, argues Stephen Kirchner n 6 December 2007, the incoming monetary policy and weaken the RBA’s account- Labor government announced a ability for infl ation at a time when it is presiding ‘new era’ for the Reserve Bank over the worst underlying infl ation outcomes since of Australia (RBA) with revised the current economic expansion began sixteen arrangements for appointing the years ago.5 Obank’s senior offi cers and external board members, in conjunction with a new joint ‘Statement on Appointment of senior officers the Conduct of Monetary Policy’ between the Under the new statement, the positions of the bank and the government.1 On the previous day, governor and deputy governor of the RBA will the RBA also announced new arrangements for have their level of statutory independence raised communicating with the public about monetary to be equal to that of the Commissioner of policy.2 The RBA board’s press release was careful Taxation and the Australian Statistician. Their to indicate that these measures had been under appointments will be made by the Governor- consideration for ‘some months.’ However, their General in Council, and can be terminated only announcement at the fi rst RBA board meeting with the approval of both houses of Parliament in after the federal election was hardly coincidental. the same session of Parliament. This measure serves Reform of the governance arrangements for the to increase the independence of the RBA’s senior RBA had been expected to be a priority for the new offi cers, in that they can no longer be dismissed by government after more than ten years of neglect ministerial fi at. -
Media & Hansard
9/22/2009 News: Australian Stock, Share & Com… Welcome to Trading Room. Skip directly to: Search Box, Section Navigation, Content, Text Version. NEWS | MYCAREER | DOMAIN | DRIVE | FINA NCE | MOBILE | RSVP | TRA VEL | WEATHER member centre | login Trading Room home page Economists air extreme views at stimulus inquiry Market watch top headlines Australian reports Aust markets: ASX expected to open lower Aust dollar report: $A opens flat after offshore session Aust credit close: Bonds close weaker World reports World commodities: Oil, gold and silver all down World markets: US and European stocks fall Stocks to watch PMV, TLS, RIO, QAN, BLD, AIO, MAP, MMX, PPX, GNS, CANBERRA, Sept 21 AAP September 21 2009, 6:06PM Senators heard both sides of the economic divide at an inquiry on Monday to determine whether the federal government's economic stimulus has worked and whether it should continue. Quizzing several academic economists, the inquiry heard that the stimulus was a waste of money, that the recession was a normal part of the business cycle and should have been left for the free market to resolve. It was also argued that the human tragedy would have been far worse without the billions of dollars stimulus, regardless of whether it results in higher interest rates and higher taxes. Indeed, one economist believed more money should be spent on lifting the unemployment benefit to stimulate the economy further. Prime Minister Kevin Rudd told CNN from New York where he is attending the United Nations General Assembly, before heading to G20 Leaders Meeting Pittsburgh later this week, that calls for an immediate withdrawal of stimulus from the global economy were "misplaced". -
11 John Quiggin Expert Reportpdf
1 2 3 4 2 refereed journal articles, focusing primarily on risk analysis and environmental economics, among over 1000 academic and popular publications. My current ARC Federation Fellowship deals with the impact of Climate Change on the Murray-Darling Basin. My curriculum vitae is provided as Attachment 1. 2. Materials used in the preparation of this report include reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the Stern Report (UK) and Garnaut Review, along with my own earlier research on the costs of climate change and the analysis of climate mitigation policy. For findings on the negative net value of coal-fired power, I have drawn on the work of Muller, N. Mendelsohn, R. and Nordhaus, W. (2011) Environmental Accounting for Pollution in the United States Economy, American Economic Review, 101(5): 1649–75 (Attachment 3). Part I: Impacts of Climate Change 3. Emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases have changed the global climate and will continue to do so in the future. 4. Research on the likely global impacts of climate change is summarised in the report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Working Group II, on Impacts and Adaptation. The primary areas of concern are: • Natural ecosystems • Effects on agriculture, forestry and fisheries • Effects of sea level rise • Health effects • Water supply • Risk of sudden and catastrophic change 5. The magnitude of these effects depends critically on the rate at which climate change takes place and the magnitude of the increase at the point when climate ultimately stabilises at a new equilibrium. -
IS AUSTRALIA the LAND of the FAIR GO? ACTU Whitlam Lecture, Melbourne, Tuesday, November 30, 2010 Ross Gittins, Economic Columni
IS AUSTRALIA THE LAND OF THE FAIR GO? ACTU Whitlam Lecture, Melbourne, Tuesday, November 30, 2010 Ross Gittins, economic columnist, SMH and The Age In writing and talking about equality and inequality, I always feel myself at a disadvantage. Everyone thinks they know more about it than I think I know. Just about everyone has it firmly fixed in their mind that the gap between rich and poor is growing - the rich are getting richer and the poor getting poorer. This trend, they know, has been running for decades, perhaps forever. My disadvantage is that when you express your opinions in a respectable newspaper rather than the pub, you’re supposed to base them on actual evidence. And when I recount the evidence, it’s never as bad as everyone knows to be the case. Even so, let me try to summarise the evidence about the distribution of income. The general story in Australia is similar to that throughout the developed world. During the first three-quarters of the 20th century, the gap between the highest and lowest incomes got progressively and significantly narrower. So some time in the 1970s was the point where the gap between rich and poor was probably the smallest it had been in many centuries. Since then, however, the gap has begun widening, undoing much of the progress we made in the post-war period. In Australia, the Bureau of Statistics began surveying the distribution of income between households in 1995, and has continued conducting surveys every few years since then, with the latest in 2008. -
The US-Australia Free Trade Agreement, Pharmaceuticals and Intellectual Property
Risk & Sustainable Management Group Australian Public Policy Program Working Paper: P05#1 nd a p hi How to kill a country?: The US–Australia s ow l Free Trade Agreement, pharmaceuticals l e F and intellectual property on m i t a ht r de on. i e t F a r l John Quiggin i de e Australian Research Council Federation Fellow, University of Queensland ounc y_f r C h c ove r c a s e s di e / s R m n a a r i l a og r t pr us _ A nt a n a gr u/ by a d e t t c gov. e . j c r o r a . P uppor s w y r h w c r w / a ove / e c s p: s t i e R D ht Schools of Economics and Political Science University of Queensland Brisbane, 4072 [email protected] http://www.uq.edu.au/economics/rsmg This version: 13 Jan 2005 How to kill a country?: The US–Australia Free Trade Agreement, pharmaceuticals and intellectual property John Quiggin Australian Research Council Federation Fellow School of Economics and School of Political Science and International Studies University of Queensland EMAIL [email protected] PHONE + 61 7 3346 9646 FAX +61 7 3365 7299 http://www.uq.edu.au/economics/johnquiggin I thank Nancy Wallace and an anonymous referee for helpful comments and criticism. This research was supported by an Australian Research Council Federation Fellowship. Keywords Pharmaceutical benefits scheme, intellectual property, US–Australia Free Trade Agreement JEL code I1 How to kill a country?: The US-Australia Free Trade Agreement, pharmaceuticals and intellectual property In February 2004, the Australian government announced the successful conclusion of negotiations for a Free Trade Agreement with the United States. -
A Passion for Policy
A Passion for Policy Essays in Public Sector Reform A Passion for Policy Essays in Public Sector Reform Edited by John Wanna Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at: http://epress.anu.edu.au/policy_citation.html National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Wanna, John. A passion for policy : ANZOG lecture series 2005-2006. ISBN 9781921313349 (pbk.). ISBN 9781921313356 (web). 1. Policy sciences. 2. Political planning - Australia. I. Australia and New Zealand School of Government. II. Title. (Series : ANSOG monographs). 320.60994 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design by John Butcher Printed by University Printing Services, ANU Funding for this monograph series has been provided by the Australia and New Zealand School of Government Research Program. This edition © 2007 ANU E Press John Wanna, Series Editor Professor John Wanna is the Sir John Bunting Chair of Public Administration at the Research School of Social Sciences at The Australian National University. He is the director of research for the Australian and New Zealand School of Government (ANZSOG). He is also a joint appointment with the Department of Politics and Public Policy at Griffith University and a principal researcher with two research centres: the Governance and Public Policy Research Centre and the nationally-funded Key Centre in Ethics, Law, Justice and Governance at Griffith University. -
SYDNEY ALUMNI Magazine
SYDNEY ALUMNI Magazine Spring 2006 SYDNEY ALUMNI Magazine 8 10 14 18 RESEARCH: THE GENDER SELECTOR FEATURE: PEAK PERFORMERS PROFILE: COONAN THE AGRARIAN ESSAY: DEAD MEDIA Spring 2006 features 10 PEAK PERFORMERS Celebrating 100 years of physical and health education. 14 COONAN THE AGRARIAN Federal Communications Minister Helen Coonan: Editor Dominic O'Grady a girl from the bush done good. The University of Sydney, Publications Office Room K6.06, Main Quadrangle A14, NSW 2006 18 DEAD MEDIA Telephone +61 2 9036 6372 Fax +61 2 9351 6868 The death of each media format not only alters Email [email protected] the way we communicate, but changes the way Sub-editor John Warburton we think. Design tania edwards design Contributors Gregory Baldwin, Tracey Beck, Vice-Chancellor Professor Gavin Brown, Graham Croker, regulars Jeff Hargrave, Stephanie Lee, Rodney Molesworth, Maggie Renvoize, Chris Rodley, Ted Sealy, Melissa Sweet, 4 OPINION Margaret Simons. International research hubs are the way of the future. Printed by Offset Alpine Printing on 55% recycled fibre. Offset Alpine is accredited with ISO 14001 for environ- 6 NEWS mental management, and only uses paper approved by Alumnus becomes Reserve Bank Governor. the Forest Stewardship Council. 8 RESEARCH: THE GENDER SELECTOR Cover illustration Gregory Baldwin. New sperm-sorting technology will make gender Advertising Please direct all inquiries to the editor. selection a commercial reality. Editorial Advisory Committe 23 NOW SHOWING The Sydney Alumni Magazine is supported by an Editorial Seymour Centre hosts theatre with bite. Advisory Committee. Its members are: Kathy Bail, Associate Editor, The Bulletin; Martin Hoffman (BEcon '86), consultant; 26 SPORT Helen Trinca, Editor, Boss (Australian Financial Review); Macquarie Bank’s David Clarke lends a hand. -
John Quiggin's Critique of Microeconomic Policy in Australia 201
Agenda, Volume 4, Number 2, 1997, pages 197-208 Irrational Expectations? John Quiggin’s Critique of Microeconomic Policy in Australia Fred Gruen John Quiggin, Great Expectations: Microeconomic Reform and Australia, Allen & Unwin, Sydney, 1996 [IS is an important book. Its critique of microeconomic policy is rooted irly and squarely in mainstream economic theory. This distinguishes it om a great many tirades against so-called ‘economic rationalism’. It is also the first attempt by an able and informed economist to challenge the current con ventional wisdom in the Australian economic policy debate about the desirability of microeconomic reform. Many Australian economists have studied individual issues associated with such reforms. But their contributions are mostly scattered. Quig gin’s book provides the first overview of many key issues in the professional eco nomic debate. Quiggin, a professor of economics at James Cook University, does not argue in a political vacuum: as he writes, ‘it is, perhaps, impossible to undertake policy analysis in a way that is completely free of ideological preconceptions’ (p. 64). Quiggin’s particular view is that ‘the policy elite displays a clear consensus that microeconomic reform is both urgently needed and beneficial’ (p. viii); ‘the prob lem with the current Australian policy debate is not an excessive reliance on eco nomics but the substitution of dogmatic precommitment for objective analysis’ (p. ix)’. Primarily, ‘Economic policy is based on a combination of a prioritheory and an emotional rejection of the policies of the 1950s and 1960s’ (p. 5). Quiggin tries to differentiate his critique from the considerable amount of root-and-branch criti cisms of current economic policies that has been proffered by sociologists, political scientists and other social scientists: ‘much criticism of current economic policy is based on nostalgia for the “good old days” of full employment and rapid growth without any clear analysis of what made those “good old days” possible’ (p. -
Surplus Fetish the Political Economy of the Surplus, Deficit and Debt
Surplus fetish The political economy of the surplus, deficit and debt Policy Brief No. 26 May 2011 ISSN 1836-9014 David Richardson Policy Brief 2 Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. Historical and international debt comparisons 4 3. Surplus thinking 7 4. Active fiscal policy—the alternative view 1 5. How does the government justify the surplus objective? 12 6. But the private sector loves government debt 13 7. Super liabilities as government debt? 15 8. Intergenerational equity? 16 9. Conclusions and reflections 17 References 19 3 In the present situation of a temporary slowdown in economic growth, an easing in the fiscal position is appropriate as it helps to support demand growth in the economy. 1 1. Introduction The federal budget presents a complex management puzzle that all governments have to address and explain to the electorate. Sometimes concepts are borrowed from the corporate sector and sometimes analogies are made with the household sector; the Howard Government, in particular, imported numerous corporate accounting concepts. But often these concepts are applied uncritically and inappropriately. By way of discussing the budget balance—surpluses, deficits and the debt outcome—this paper addresses some of those inappropriate usages and their consequences. During the recent election campaign, both sides of the political debate paid homage to the virtues of a budget surplus, along with the associated views that deficits and debt are ‘bad’ and need to be reined in as soon as possible, and continue to do so. Budget one-upmanship has moved beyond the balanced-budget obsession of the 1990s to the new aim of producing an ongoing surplus, the bigger the better, under which it is taken for granted that everyone will be better off.