1494 Inter Agency Rapid Assessment(IARA)

Home , Azakhel Payan, Bilitang, Lachi Tehsil, Landi Arbab, Nowshera Tehsil, Pabbi Tehsil

INTER-AGENCY RAPID ASSESSMENT

REPORT ON KHYBER OFF-CAMP IDPS IN PESHAWAR, NOWSHERA AND KOHAT – KP April 2012

Prepared by IOM with the technical inputs from IVAP and WFP

Supported by

Contents

1.0 Executive Summary 3

2.0 Introduction 3

3.0 Objectives 4

4.0 Methodology 4-5

5.0 Limitations 5

6.0 Key Findings 6-27

7.0 Conclusion 27

8.0 Recommendations 28

9.0 Annexes 29-36

1.0 Executive Summary

The Inter-agency Rapid Assessment is a broad analysis of the off-camp IDPs arriving from Khyber Agency into the districts of Peshawar, Nowshera and Kohat in KP in the first quarter of 2012.

The following report endeavours to provide a general summary of findings of key issue areas to enable the planning and rapid deployment of humanitarian initiatives for the benefit of the target IDPs their families and host communities in the assessed areas.

The findings are presented in sections which include, IDP Characteristics, Gender & Child, IDP Movements, IDP Tribes, Protection, Shelter, Food, Health, WASH and Education, Sources of Income, Assistance Provided and IDP Needs.

The summary findings presented in this report are intended to provide a basis for intervention and are indicative and not representative due to the urgency of this growing crisis. The assessment was conducted as Key Informant Interviews in villages identified as key hosting areas for the Khyber IDPs and does not capture the entire displaced population.

For a copy of the complete IARA data, please contact Shaista Attaullah, Humanitarian Affair Officer, UN OCHA via email on [email protected].

2.0 Introduction

The ongoing security operations in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) and parts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) have led to large scale population displacements across the region since 2009. Within the last three month period, since 20 January 2012, the number of Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) arriving from Khyber Agency has increased exponentially.

Displacements are mainly occurring from Bara tehsil in Khyber Agency where a number of new areas and tribal groups have recently been notified as eligible for IDP assistance following scaling up of security operations in their areas. Early indications suggest that IDPs are arriving in the districts of Peshawar, Nowshera and Kohat in KP. A proportion of around 10% according to UNHCR) is settling in Jalozai camp in Nowshera, with the remainder settling in unsustainable off- camp locations that pose significant risks to the IDPs and their host communities.

The deterioration in the humanitarian situation, due to the lack of/or limited local resources, unavailability of basic amenities and services and the resultant burden on host communities has the potential to create a myriad of long-term issues in addition to the immediate emergency.

In this backdrop, an Inter-agency Rapid Assessment (IARA) was conducted in April 2012 to assess the number of Khyber off-camp IDPs in KP and their immediate needs and issues. IARA was initiated by the HRT and conducted as a joint effort between IOM, WFP and IVAP. The

assessment was supported by Save the Children, UNICEF, CERD, NRC, BEST, ACTED, SSTD and LHO with the coordination assistance of UNOCHA and the PDMA Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.

3.0 Objectives

The IARA was conducted to broadly map IDP movements and assess their needs and issues in order to guide and target humanitarian aid effectively and efficiently. Following are the specific objectives of this assessment: i. To identify and map locations and assess the number of off-camp IDPs from Khyber Agency ii. To assess key vulnerabilities and immediate needs of off-camp Khyber IDPs iii. To provide a basis for immediate intervention and follow-up

4.0 Methodology

The multi-sector rapid assessment was designed jointly by the IARA partners in order to capture key macro-level data on IDP demographics, health, WASH and education status with particular emphasis on immediate problems and priority needs.

Due to time constraints and immediacy of needs, the assessment was formulated as a key informant interview (KII) at village level.

The rapid assessment was planned and designed with the technical inputs of all IARA partner agencies based on relevant sector expertise and carried out across the three districts of Peshawar, Nowshera and Kohat covering 6 Tehsils, 54 Union Councils (UC) and 275 villages within a three day period (8th to 10th April 2012). The assessment was conducted by enumerators consisting of 16 teams consisting of 46 enumerators (8 female and 38 male) provided by the partner organisations that took part in the IARA.

The assessment locations were identified and selected based on recommendations by the PDMA Khyber Pakhtunkhwa following consultations with Shura members in the Jalozai camp.

The IARA was conducted using electronic handheld information devices; PDAs (Personal Data Assistants) to reduce the time required in data collection and processing and to improve quality of data collection and entry. The PDAs and technical support was provided by the core IARA team. In addition to reducing the time required to conduct the assessment, the PDAs also supported GIS mapping with exact GPS coordinates that enable a spatial understanding of the geographic distribution of IDPs by district and Tehsil. The maps further illustrate the immediate needs of off- camp IDPs by priority in their relevant locations. Enumerators also used paper-based questionnaires in a few locations where the PDAs could not be used due to security or technical

issues. The data from these questionnaires were entered and uploaded into the information database.

IOM, WFP and IVAP jointly organised a one-day training programme to provide a basic orientation to the enumerators on field assessments, key informant interview methods, using questionnaires and standardisation in data collection and entry.

The training was conducted in two parts. During the first part IOM, WFP and IVAP orientated the enumerators on the survey instrument and the enumerators were also informed about basic field sensitivity. The second part was to provide technical inputs on the use of PDAs for assessments. This component was facilitated and conducted by WFP and IOM. The Chief Coordinator PDMA (KP) also attended the training session where he assured support for the assessment on behalf of the PDMA. On the following day, the enumerators tested the PDAs and questionnaire in the field to identify and resolve any significant issues that may have arisen. In order to rectify the issues faced by the enumerator during the field test, a feedback session was conducted by WFP and IOM.

For the purposes of verification, female members of each assessment team were required to question female members/groups in the village independent of the main interview to provide additional insights that would verify primary interview findings.

Upon completion of the assessment, the data was compartmentalised, compiled, cleaned and analysed by IOM, WFP and IVAP independently based on sectoral expertise. The overall data was analysed by each of the three agencies and shared to reduce duplication and to improve the cleaning and accuracy of the data before incorporating each data set into a primary database for final analysis and reporting.

5.0 Limitations

Due to the rapid nature of the assessment, the information provided in this report is based on inputs provided by key informants who are based in the assessed locations. The assessment covers basic issues required for immediate humanitarian attention rather than detailed information which could be expected from a household survey. In addition, there were a few areas where the survey could not be conducted due to constraints in access.

6.0 Key Findings

This section provides the key findings of the assessment. The following analysis highlights key sectoral issues and needs of the Khyber off-camp displaced population and their host communities in general terms. The rapid assessment indicates an emerging crisis in the basic human needs and development areas in the assessed displacement locations due to rising costs in housing, food and healthcare, limited economic opportunities and declining wages due to increased competition which pose significant risks to the already economically vulnerable Khyber IDPs.

6.1 Target Locations and Respondents

This section provides basic information on the locations assessed by district and tehsil and the respondents’ gender breakdown.

Locations assessed in KP

No. District Tehsils UC Villages 1 Peshawar 2 40 213 2 Nowshera 2 8 35 3 Kohat 2 6 17 Total 3 6 54 2651 Table 1: Locations covered by the assessment

Respondents

As anticipated, the majority of Respondent Gender interviewees were male (88%) with only

Breakdown Female 12% females interviewed in the three 12% districts. The interviews in Kohat were gender-balanced with 53% male and 47% female. The districts of Nowshera and Peshawar differed with interviewees predominantly being male. In Nowshera, the percentage of male interviewees was 97% and in Peshawar, 90%. Male 88%

Fig. 1: Respondent gender breakdown (Overall)

1 One key respondent per village (Key Informant interview)

6.2 IDP Characteristics

This section broadly details the characteristics of the Khyber off-camp IDPs by providing a breakdown of individuals and households by district and tehsil, the assessed IDP population by gender and the proportion of children defined by age.

Khyber off-camp IDP population figures by district

District No. of Individuals No. of Households Kohat 654 88 Nowshera 11,055 1,365 Peshawar 65,175 8,212 Total 76,884 9,665 Table 2: Khyber off-camp IDP breakdown by district

As shown in the above table, the total number of Khyber off-camp IDPs has been estimated as 76,884 individuals representing 9,665 households. Among these, Peshawar accounts for 85%, Nowshera 14% and Kohat 1% of the IDP distribution.

Many of the questions in the IARA assessment were framed to identify the number of households rather than the number of families. The average household size calculated from the assessment data is 8. While any inferences of family size or composition cannot be accurately gleaned from this information, it is noteworthy that the average family size in KP is 11 persons2. This differs substantially from IDP families that have registered at Jalozai which records approximately 5 persons per family according to UNHCR. This should be further analysed in the recommended household level survey.

Number of Households (By IDP Households (By District)

District) 1% 14% 9000 8,212 8000 7000 6000

5000 4000 3000 2000 1,365 Kohat 1000 88 85% Nowshera 0 Kohat Nowshera Peshawar Peshawar Fig 2: Number of IDP households by district Fig 3: IDP households by district (%)

2 UN Habitat Settlement Survey of 2010

Tehsil No. of Households No. of Individuals Peshawar District Peshawar Town-III 3,058 23,139 Peshawar Town-IV 5,154 42,036 District Total 8,212 65,175 Nowshera District Nowshera 388 2,544 Pabbi 977 8,511 District Total 1,365 11,055 Kohat District Kohat 24 133 Lachi 64 521 District Total 88 654 Total 9,665 76,884 Table 3: Number of IDP households by Tehsil

Table 3 above further defines the IDP distribution in the three districts by tehsil level.

No. of Households (By Tehsil) IDP Households (%) Peshawar Peshawar Town-III 6000 5,154 37% 5000

4000 3,058 3000 2000 1000 0 Town-IV Peshawar (Town-III) Peshawar (Town-IV) 63% Fig 4: Number of IDP households in Peshawar Fig 5: IDP households in Peshawar (%)

Figures 4 and 5 provide a breakdown of the total number of households in Peshawar by Tehsil (Towns III and IV). With 42,036 Khyber IDPs, Peshawar Town IV has the largest IDP population compared to all other Tehsils covered in this assessment.

No. of Households (By Tehsil) IDPs Households (%)

Nowshera Nowshera Nowshera 28% 1200 977 1000 800 600 388 400

200 Pabbi 0 72% Nowshera Pabbi Fig 6: Number of IDP households in Nowshera Fig 7: IDP households in Nowshera (%)

Nowshera has the second largest concentration of off-camp IDPs within the three districts. Figures 6 and 7 above provide a breakdown of the total number of households in Nowshera by Tehsil. The Tehsils, Nowshera and Pabbi are hosting 2,544 and 8,511 IDPs respectively.

No. of Households (By Tehsil) IDP Households (%) Kohat Kohat Kohat 70 64 27% 60 50

30 24 20 10 0 Lachi 73% Kohat Lachi Fig 8: Number of IDP households in Kohat Fig 9: IDP Households in Kohat (%)

Kohat has the lowest number of off-camp IDPs in the assessed areas. The two Tehsils in this district, Kohat and Lachi host 24 and 64 IDP families respectively as shown in figures 8 and 9.

Note: A number of villages visited (10 of 275) identified Khyber IDPs from areas other than the officially notified tehsil of Bara and contains a total of 88 families from Jamrod and Landi Kotal tehsils. These IDP families are not considered eligible for registration as they do not originate from notified villages and are not therefore further included in the analysis or report. However, the assessment identifies them as displaced vulnerable families in need of assistance.

The recommended follow-up household survey may provide greater detail of specific households originating from Bara tehsil including the length of time over which they have been displaced.

Additionally, the status of displacement of the identified Bara IDPs requires further verification, including checks that the Beneficiary CNIC cards identify two Bara addresses.

Gender and Child

IDPIDPIDP Children Children Children by by Districtby District District

100% 90% 80% 70% 104 417 10,585 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 67 325 7,960

10%

0% Kohat Nowshera Peshawar

Children between 2 and 5 Children less than 2 Fig 10: IDP population by gender Fig 11: Representation of IDP Children

Figure 10 above shows the total number of Khyber off-camp IDPs by gender demonstrating that 47% of all IDPs are female and 53% male denoting a relative gender balance. As per figure 11, the age break-up of children shows a ratio of infants (less than 24 months) and children between 2-5 years to be around 2:3.

The above figures are general estimates and are intended to provide a broad representation of the gender and child distribution in the target locations and are therefore to be considered as indicative of general trends only.

6.3 IDP Movements

This section details the trend in IDP movements out of Khyber Agency into the three districts and their respective tehsils.

IDPs Arrival Timeline (%) During last 1 to 2 week 2% weeks ago 12%

3 to 4 weeks ago More than 19% 1 Month ago 67% Fig 12: Total IDP arrivals to host areas (%)

Overall, as illustrated in figure 12 above, a vast majority of Khyber IDPs (67%) arrived in their present locations over a month ago (within 1-2 months; since the commencement of security operations). The second largest movement of 19% occurred in the previous 3 to 4 week period.

IDP Arrivals Trend (By District) 60000 49,559 50000

40000

Peshawar 30000 Nowshera 20000 Axis Title Axis Kohat 13,865 1,661 10000 1,451 917 7,455 901,232 0 654 More than one 3 to 4 weeks ago 1 to 2 weeks ago During last week month ago Fig 13: Trend of IDP arrivals (by district)

IDP Arrivals - Peshawar IDP Arrivals - Nowshera

More than one 30,929 More than one 926 month ago 18,630 month ago 525 9,648 3 to 4 weeks ago 3 to 4 weeks ago 4,217 917 7,155 1,459 1 to 2 weeks ago 1 to 2 weeks ago 300 202 During last week 430 During last week 802 90 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 Nowshera Pabbi Peshawar (Town-III) Peshawar (Town-IV) IDP Arrivals - Kohat Fig 14: IDP arrivals by Tehsil of each district

As per figure 14, the majority of IDPs arrived 521 in Peshawar over a month ago. Nowshera More than one had seen only a fraction of the total IDP month ago arrivals during that time with a significant 133 increase in IDP arrivals (65% of total arrivals to Nowshera) in the last 1 to 2 week period.

0 200 400 600 All Kohat IDPs arrived over a month ago.

Kohat Lachi

6.4 IDP Tribes

The following section provides information on IDP tribes by hosting areas.

Figure 15 represents the percentage of IDP Tribes in Hosted Areas villages across all three districts that are Bar Qambar host to IDPs from diverse tribes. Khel Shalobar 9% Qambar Khel 15% Sepah Malikdin Khel accounts for 24% of the 13% overall while Stori Khel is the lowest Aka Khel represented with 2%. Zaka Khel 17% 10%

Stori Khel 2%

Kamar Khel Malikdin Khel 10% 24%

Fig 15: IDP tribes represented in assessed villages (overall)

6.5 Protection

This section details the status of registration of IDPs by district and tehsil and further informs on some of the main reasons for non-registration. The section also provides an understanding of child protection concerns of IDPs and looks at threats and danger zones to women and girls.

IDP Registration Status (By District) IDP Registration Status (%)

Don’t know 100% 24 595 1% 90% Not 80% Registered 70% 40,703 45% 60% 50% 582 10,148 40% 30% 20% 24,072 10% 48 0% 312 400 Registered Kohat Nowshera Peshawar 54% Don’t know No Yes Fig 16: IDP registration status by district Fig 17: IDP registrations (%)

Overall, findings show that a significant number of IDPs (45%) have not been registered while 54% are registered with 15% recorded as ‘unknown’ (figure 17).

IDP Registration Status - Peshawar IDP Registration Status - 100% Nowshera 90% 7,126 100% 80% 90% 595 70% 80% 60% 33,577 70% 50% 60% 40% 50% 8,351 16,013 1,797 30% 40% 30% 20% 20% 10% 8,059 10% 0% 400 0% 152 160 Peshawar (Town-III) Peshawar (Town-IV) Nowshera Pabbi Don’t know No Yes Don’t know No Yes Fig 18: IDP registrations in Peshawar Fig 19: IDP registrations in Nowshera

Within the district of Peshawar (figure 18), the two Tehsils demonstrate contrasting trends. In Town III, the unregistered rate is notably higher than the registered with 69% to 31% while in Town IV, the reverse is true with 80% registered and 19% unregistered. Nowshera (figure 19) portrays similar overall trends in status of registrations with 70% and 98% noted as unregistered in Nowshera and Pabbi tehsils. As per the IARA, none of the Khyber IDPs in the assessed locations in Pabbi tehsil have been registered.

As with Nowshera, a majority of the off-camp IDP Registration Status Khyber IDP population in the district of Kohat Kohat is unregistered (89%). In Lachi Tehsil, 91% is 100% noted as unregistered with the remaining 9% 90% 24 80% recorded as ‘unknown’ (figure 24). 70% Registered 60% 473 Despite the high negative percentages in 50% Not Registered 40% 109 Kohat Tehsil (82%), the actual number of off- Don’t know 30% camp IDPs residing in the area is minimal 20% compared to the other Tehsils and districts. 10% 0% 48 Kohat Lachi Fig 20: IDP registrations in Kohat

Reason for not getting registered

29%

22%

16% 16% 15%

Lacking or No Problems in Not enough Cannot reach Lines are too Ethnic CNIC CNIC information on jalozai Lack of long in Jalozai sensitivity

registration transportation

process

Fig 21: Reasons for not getting registered

At present, all registrations (both on and off camp) are done at the Jalozai IDP camp in Nowshera district where humanitarian organisations and the Government are facilitating the registration process of newly displaced families. According to UNHCR3, 90% of registered families are choosing to live off-camp. Many families are also not registering at Jalozai as they consider the process to be too long and arduous. They mentioned the lack of transportation, long queues and waiting times as key constraints (figure 21). This is seen across all tehsils as per figure 22 below.

3 Khyber Influx Update of 19 April 2012 - UNHCR

It was also mentioned that there were significant procedural delays on the part of the Jalozai camp management and that they did not wish to be there with female family members. During the key informant interviews, respondents also mentioned that members of local community groups had threatened IDPs not to get registered.

Peshawar Town - III Peshawar Town - IV 28% 30% 27% 19% 21% 16% 15% 18% 13% 5% 7% 1%

Problems in CNIC Ethnic sensitivity Problems in CNIC Ethnic sensitivity Lacking or No CNIC Lacking or No CNIC

Not enough informati.. Not enough informati.. Cannot reachLines jalozai are ... too long in J... Cannot reachLines jalozai are L... too long in Ja...

Pabbi Tehsil Nowshera Tehsil 33% 40% 40%

22% 22% 22%

15%

Lacking or No Problems in CNIC Cannot reach Lines are too long Problems in CNIC Not enough Cannot reach Lines are too long CNIC jalozai Lack of in Jalozai information on jalozai Lack of in Jalozai transportation registration transportation process Kohat Tehsil Lachi Tehsil 33%

36%

22% 22% 22%

21% 21%

14%

Lacking or No Problems in Not enough Cannot reach Lines are too Lacking or No CNIC Not enough Cannot reach Lines are too long CNIC CNIC information on jalozai Lack of long in Jalozai information on jalozai Lack of in Jalozai registration transportation registration transportation process process Figure 22: Reasons for not getting registered by tehsil

Note: 40% of the assessed villages in Pabbi tehsil have mentioned that they cannot reach Jalozai or that they have issues with transportation to Jalozai. This issue needs to be further examined through the recommended HH survey as Jalozai camp is located in Pabbi tehsil.

Child Protection Concerns

13% 15% 13% 10% 9% 9% 10% 10% 6% 8% 4% 4% 4% 4% 5% 2% 3% 1% 0%

None Illness

No play area Fear of abuse Fear of kidnapping Not able to go outside Restricted movement Psychological distress

Feeling frightened and insecure Changes in behavior and attitude Lack of facilities Education, Health etc Fear at family inability to earn a Livelihood Strangers wanting to talk to my child or children Having to walk to farAnxious for water at family or food being distribution separated - leaving home Fig 23: Child protection concerns (Overall)

As can be seen in the above figure 23, psychological distress and illness are ranked the highest with 13% each followed by behavioural change and lack of facilities with 10% each.

Threats to Women or girls

Others 1%

17% Dont Know Social discrimination 9%

9% Verbal abuse Physical violence 7% 57% None

Fig 24: Threats to women and girls in emergency (Overall)

On the prevalence of specific threats of women and children; results based on respondent answers show that 9% feel that there is social discrimination against this group while another 9% perceive that they face verbal abuse. 7% cites physical violence as a key threat to women and girls. A majority of 57% say there is no specific threat while 17% report they do not know. While these results give an indication, some caution is advised as these answers are from key informants who are mostly male.

Danger Zones for Women and Girls

38%

15% 11% 9% 8% 5% 4% 4% 3% 1% 2%

None Market School Dont know Bathing points In transit to school In transit to market In the health facility Water collection point While working in the field While using public transit

Fig 25: Danger zones for women and children (Overall)

As per respondent answers denoted in figure 25 above, the second highest perceived and/or actual risk for women and adolescent girls in the assessed areas is while travelling to the local markets with 15%. The markets themselves are also mentioned as a high risk with 9%. Together, market related risks are 24%. With 8%, public transportation is rated as the third highest risk factor and may also be associated to some extent with the primary risk factor.

6.6 Shelter

This section provides an understanding of the shelter options available to the IDPs and their associated living conditions by district.

IDP Shelter (By District) 100% 2%

90% 17%

34% 80% 70% Hujras

60% 46% 81% Schools 50% Rented Houses Open Air 40% In Public Buildings 66% 30% 22% With Host Families 20%

10% 15% 16% 0% Kohat Nowshera Peshawar Fig 26: IDP shelter by district

As illustrated in figure 26, a majority of off-camp Khyber IDPs in Peshawar are living in rented houses and account for 81% of the Khyber IDP population in Peshawar and accounts for 72% of the overall population across all three districts. The second most common accommodation status for Khyber IDPs in Peshawar is host families with 16%. Open air and public buildings are rated less than 1% and are not represented in the above figure.

In Nowshera, 46% of the Khyber off-camp IDP population is living in open areas while most of the remaining are distributed between public buildings, rented houses and host families with 22%, 17% and 15% respectively. Note that the assessment was a key informant assessment and as such verification of the living conditions of individual households was not confirmed. 46% of households living in the open air is extremely high and should be verified as a priority.

In Kohat, the total off-camp Khyber IDP population is distributed between host families and rented houses with 66% and 34%.

The above break-down is indicative based on sampling limitations and not an exact representation of Khyber IDP settlement status in the three districts. In consideration of the large number of IDP families living off-camp and shelter being rated as the first priority need (Section

6.12) by the assessed IDPs, it is inherently clear that shelter assistance needs to be given immediate and urgent attention.

6.7 Food

The Khyber off-camp IDPs, due to the very nature of their living conditions, are extremely vulnerable to food insecurity. This is confirmed by the fact that food, next to shelter, has been identified as the second priority need by the respondents.

A vast majority of the assessed Khyber IDPs have been found to be dependent on daily wage labour (Section 6.11) which makes them extremely vulnerable to food insecurity due to their dependence on unstable livelihood options which secures only a meagre income. Also, since most of them are living in rented accommodation, that leaves them with little purchasing capacity in the context of rising market prices.

Food security could also be an issue for families hosting Khyber IDPs due to the additional burden.

IDPs were asked if they were facing any problems feeding their children (less than one year old). 32% of all respondents mentioned that they were facing problems and this proportion was as high as 57% in the district of Nowshera (Figure 27). The fact that such a high proportion is facing difficulties in feeding their infants is an indication of their precarious food security condition.

Problems Feeding Infants (By District)

100% 6% 90% 30% 80% 70% 57% 60% 50% 94% 40% 66% 30% 20% 43% 10%

0% 5% Kohat Nowshera Peshawar

Dont Know No Yes

Fig 27: IDPs facing problems feeding infant children (<1 year old)

It was also found that almost 50% of Khyber off-camp IDPs received some food assistance from UN and I/NGOs (Section 6.12).

6.8 Health

This section discusses the type and availability of health facilities and informs on the delivery of vaccinations to IDP children across the three districts.

Availability of health facilities

Availability of Health Availability of Health Facilities (By District) Facilities 100.0% 92.5% 15% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% 60% 60.0% 59% 50.0% 41% 40% 40.0% 30.0%

20.0% 10.0% 7.5% 85% 0.0% Kohat Now shera Peshaw ar Available Not available Available Not available Fig 28: Availability of health facilities (%) Fig 29: Availability of health facilities (By District)

The majority of respondents (85%) reported that health facilities were available whereas 15% noted they lack any form of healthcare (figure 28). On the availability of health facilities overall, Peshawar rated the highest with 92.5%, followed by Nowshera with 60% and Kohat with 41%. It is assumed that the availability of health facilities is greater for IDPs living in Peshawar as it is more urban than the rural areas of Nowshera and Kohat.

Health facility by type (availability)

Fig 30: Type of available healthcare by district As shown in the ‘total bar’ in figure 30, private clinics are the most commonly available health facility overall while government-run Basic Health Units (BHU) are the second most available. Civil Dispensaries (CD) and Rural Health Centres (RHC) account for a lesser percentage. These trends are similar to that of Peshawar while the healthcare situation in Nowshera and Kohat is contrastingly different.

In Peshawar and Nowshera, where 99% of the Khyber IDP population is located, some form of healthcare, albeit available as indicated in figure 30 above, is largely provided by private health clinics (71.8% and 45.7%) which are generally costly.

Vaccinations

Have IDP children under the age Have IDP children below the age of 15 received Polio vaccinations? of 15 received Polio vaccinations?

100% 1% 100% 3% 6% 13% 90% 90% 24% 35% 80% 37% 80% 70% 70%

60% 60% 77%

50% 100% 50% 86% 40% 40% 70% 30% 60% 30% 65%

20% 20%

10% 10% 23%

0% 0% Peshaw ar Now shera Kohat Peshaw ar Now shera Kohat Yes No Don't know Yes No Don't know Fig 31: Polio and EPI vaccinations

The coverage of polio vaccinations is greater than the coverage of EPI vaccinations across the board. 84% of IDP children under the age of 15 years have received polio vaccinations whereas only 64% have received EPI vaccinations (figure 31).

As indicated, Kohat has 100% coverage of polio vaccinations while Nowshera has the lowest percentage with 60%. For EPI vaccinations, Peshawar and Kohat have the highest proportion of children vaccinated for this disease with 70% and 65% respectively. However, the number of EPI vaccinated children below the age of 15 in Nowshera is exceptionally low with only 23%.

6.9 WASH

The majority of respondents, 95%, reported that water was available in their respective districts.

In the assessed areas of the three districts, all respondents in Kohat indicated that water is available while 6% respondents in Peshawar and 7% in Nowshera reported that water was unavailable.

Primary Source of Drinking Water (By Village) 1% 13% 16%

10%

2% Tap Water Tube Well Spring 35% River, canal, pond, stream Surface water, paddy field 20% 0% 1% 1% Hand pump

Tanker

Water system (home) Water system (communal) Traditional well, ring well Rainwater

Fig 32: Primary source of drinking water

As indicated in figure 32, tube wells are the most common source of drinking water with 35%, followed by hand pumps at 20% and tap water at 16%. It is assumed that these are all protected sources. Even though availability of drinking water does not seem to be a significant problem, the quality and adequacy of water was not assessed in this survey.

6.10 Education

In this section, the assessment covered the district-wise levels of school attendance and identified main reasons for non-attendance.

Do your children attend School?

Total 1% 62% 37%

Peshawar 1% 62% 37%

Nowshera 77% 23%

Kohat 24% 76%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Dont Know No Yes

Fig 33: School attendance by district

As seen in figure 33, school attendance is very low among children of off-camp Khyber IDPs with only 37% of the respondents reporting positively. The highest proportion of children attending school is in Kohat with 76% whereas Nowshera has the lowest with 23%. In Peshawar where a large majority of the IDP population resides, only 37% attend school.

Overall reasons for not attending school

2% 2% 3% Cultural issues 4% 11% School is too far 7% No separate school for girls 5% School is not secure 10% 2% Children work at home 5% Children are earning money No money for school fees No books, copies, etc 8% 5% No uniform Denied admission are IDPs 13% Goes to Madrassa 23% Gender discrimination Child does not want Child is underage

Fig 34: Reasons for not attending school

The inability to pay school fees is the most commonly cited reason for low attendance with 23% while children lacking books and uniforms are the second and third most prevalent reasons with 13% and 8% respectively (figure 34).

6.11 Sources of Income

Main Income Source Skilled wage labour Door-to-door 14% petty trading 2%

Don’t know 5%

Daily wage labour 79%

Fig 35: Main sources of income (%)

The assessment recorded a majority of income earners as unskilled daily wage labours with 79%; a group generally considered to be the “least likely” to be able to meet daily needs. ‘Farming, share cropping and tenancy’ are not reflected in the above graph due to their low percentages.

Daily labour refers to many different types of short-term unskilled jobs. Some examples include,

 Farming activities during planting and harvesting seasons  Temporary construction work in the immediate or adjacent areas  Temporary factory work at local sugar and flour mills due to the large cultivation of sugarcane and wheat. Many villagers work at these factories on daily wages  Workshops (mainly in Charsadda, Nowshera or Peshawar)

6.12 Assistance received by Khyber off-camp IDPs

Assistance for IDPs (By District) 100% 2 2 36 58

80% UN

None 60% 207 219 230 137 189 262 NGO 40% Local Philanthropists 1 20% 35 4 35 Govt. 11 5 5 35 34 24 22 27 1 1 0% 1 5 1 1 Food Health Water Shelter NFIs Cash

Fig 36: Assistance provided to IDPs (By number of villages)

The above figure 36 denotes the multi-sector type and level of assistance provided by the government, humanitarian agencies and local philanthropists to individual villages. As can be seen in the figure, an overwhelming majority have stated that they have not received any assistance in any sector.

Out of the options provided (excluding ‘none’), assistance provided by the UN ranks highest and followed by Government, NGOs and local philanthropists.

Service Provider Food Health Water Shelter NFI Cash None 137 219 207 230 189 262 Government 24 35 22 1 5 1 NGO 35 4 1 5 34 1 UN 58 2 0 2 36 0 Local Philanthropists 11 5 35 27 1 1 Table 4: Multi-sector assistance provided per village

6.13 IDP Needs

Shelter

50% 44% 40% 30%

20%

10% Water 4% 0% Food 39% 9%

Education 1st Need 2nd Need Fig 37: IDP priority needs (first and second)

When asked about their immediate needs, it was evident from the responses that Shelter and Food were the most important and immediate basic needs of the Khyber off-camp IDPs. Figure 37 shows the percentage of respondents listing their priority needs by category.

Shelter, at 44%, is the first priority need of the majority of Khyber IDPs as 90% of IDP families were opting to live off-camp4. This issue has been exacerbated by increasing house rental rates due to the high numbers of IDP arrivals into the target areas. This has also resulted in an increase of IDPs living with host families and thereby stretching their coping capacities.

Particularly vulnerable are Hazar Khwani-I, Hazar Khwani-II, Landi Arbab, Malkandheri and Sufaid Dheri in terms of shelter according to the rapid assessment. As mentioned above, the need for food was rated the second most urgent need with 39%.

IDPs that have registered are assumed to be receiving food packages on a monthly basis. As lack of food is rated as the second priority need, it can be assumed that this is due to the large numbers of unregistered IDPs in the assessed locations. Therefore, along with shelter and other emergency assistance areas, IDP registrations should also be prioritised for multiple reasons which include the reduction of food insecurity in these areas. It must also be mentioned that shelter and food are generally rated as immediate and urgent needs by IDPs even though they may already be receiving some assistance in these areas.

4 Khyber Influx Update of 19 April 2012 - UNHCR

The need for education is also reported in some UCs of Peshawar as the first priority need where IDP families are facing difficulties with school administration. Deh Bahadar, Sheikh Muhammadii and Suleman Khel are the main UCs where IDP children are facing difficulties in getting admission into the local schools. This has mainly been attributed to a lack of educational certificates and other relevant documents.

Although shelter and food are noted as the first and second priority needs of the Khyber off-camp IDPs, they may be receiving some shelter and food assistance. This should be further investigated through multi-sector surveys as recommended in this report.

7.0 Conclusion

The IARA was designed and implemented as a quick mapping and vulnerability assessment in the districts of Peshawar, Nowshera and Kohat which are identified as primary relocation areas for insecurity-affected IDPs from Khyber Agency who are currently displaced in ‘off-camp’ hosting areas in KP.

The assessment was planned and carried out by multiple partner agencies with the coordination support of UNOCHA within a short period of time due to the prevailing and growing emergency encompassing the regions of KP and FATA and therefore, the information in this report is intended to provide a broad generalised overview of the emerging crisis only.

The IARA report highlights some key issue areas affecting both the off-camp Khyber IDPs and host communities that need to be further researched in greater detail and addressed by the humanitarian agencies. The IARA partners hope that the report provides an impetus for the rapid deployment of assistance to address the identified needs.

For a copy of the complete IARA data, please contact Shaista Attaullah, Humanitarian Affair Officer, UN OCHA via email on [email protected].

8.0 Recommendations

The following recommendations are made based on the findings of this report,

1. Since shelter and food are cited as the most immediate needs by the Khyber IDPs, these should be the immediate priority for humanitarian assistance.

2. Rent assistance has previously not been considered for IDPs, but IARA clearly demonstrates a significantly higher trend of IDPs choosing to live off camp than on-camp, with the vast majority staying in rental accommodation. The assessment indicates that rent costs are rising and higher rental costs leads to less available money for food, health services and other basic necessities. Thus, a cash grant to cover rent may be considered supported by advocacy to prevent prices inflation due to high demand.

3. There is a clear and immediate need for additional registration and distribution sites, especially in the district of Peshawar.

4. Strong information campaigns designed to advertise and raise awareness of the importance of EPI vaccinations is required and may be coupled with Polio vaccinations. This should be immediately followed-up by EPI vaccination initiatives for IDP children.

5. The Education Cluster can use this information as the baseline to design projects in locations where IDP children are not attending school as detailed in this report.

6. WASH and Health cluster may use the available data as a baseline for project design and introduce WASH and health interventions for IDP families living in locations of highest concentration and least served.

7. A referral system should be established for vulnerable groups for health and protection issues with a special emphasis on the needs and issues of women and children.

8. A detailed household survey is required to more precisely identify and map the number of IDPs/families and their most pressing sector-specific needs. This could either be in the form of a multi-cluster survey or individual cluster surveys. These surveys should also focus on the impact caused by resource limitations and sharing, market prices, etc on the host families/communities to obtain a holistic view of the issues and better serve the needs of the affected IDPs and their host communities. If independent cluster surveys are conducted, each independent survey framework should be designed and agreed at an inter-cluster level to ensure that individual cluster level surveys complement each other to enable cross- sectoral data analysis between related information.

9.0 Annexes5

Map 1: Spatial distribution and timeline of IDP arrivals across the three districts.

5 In Nowshera and certain areas of Kohat, the assessment team were not able to obtain GPS coordinates and as such some information is not reflected in the current maps and has been added manually 30

Map 2: IDP arrival trend in hosting areas6

6 The ellipses in the map show the IDP arrival trend in the hosting areas. It highlights that the majority of IDPs who “arrived more than a month ago” are living in Peshawar and recent trend is gradually inclined to stay closer to the relief distribution site/IDP camp in Jallozai. 31

Map 3: Needs analysis by district

Map 4: IDP protection issues 33

Map 5: Proposed registration/assistance site for IDPs7

7 The proposed site is calculated automatically using geo-spatial techniques. This is the median location of IDPs in the hosting areas. On ground real situations may differ from this hypothetical proposal. 34

Assessment Locations

Host No of District Host Tehsil Host UC Host Village individuals Kohat Kohat Bilitang Bilitang 31 Kohat Kohat Bilitang Bilitang 29 Kohat Kohat Gumbat Gumbat 9 Kohat Kohat Khushal Garh Siab 24 Kohat Kohat Khushal Garh Siab 15 Kohat Kohat Kohat Urban-II Hafiz abad 16 Kohat Kohat Sher Kot Gumbat 9 Kohat Lachi Jarma Anar kalay 48 Kohat Lachi Jarma Anar kaley 64 Kohat Lachi Jarma High way chok 70 Kohat Lachi Jarma High way chok 40 Kohat Lachi Jarma Islam kot 54 Kohat Lachi Jarma Islamkot 50 Kohat Lachi Jarma Khawasi banda 35 Kohat Lachi Jarma Khawasi banda 48 Kohat Lachi Jarma zara mela 64 Kohat Lachi Jarma zara mela 48 Nowshera Nowshera Aman Garh Aman gar kalay 13 Nowshera Nowshera Azakhel Payan Azakil payan 150 Nowshera Nowshera Dheri Katti Khel Kati khel 152 Nowshera Nowshera Dheri Katti Khel Kati khel 84 Nowshera Nowshera Inzari Azakhel bala mera 20 Nowshera Nowshera Jalozai Dahag behsud 50 Nowshera Nowshera Jalozai Gulab din sara pund mira 140 Nowshera Nowshera Jalozai Jalozai mera Shabara 200 Nowshera Nowshera Jalozai Jalozi mahal 80 Nowshera Nowshera Jalozai Main jalozai 280 Nowshera Nowshera Jalozai Shabara jJalozai Mera 20 Nowshera Nowshera Jalozai Sheikano kalay 490 Nowshera Nowshera Jalozai Shekanu Jalozai 200 Nowshera Nowshera Jalozai Shekanu kalay 200 Nowshera Nowshera Jalozai Spin khak 15 Nowshera Nowshera Nowshera City Amangarh 90 Nowshera Nowshera Saleh Khana Salah khan 360 Nowshera Pabbi Akbar Pura Hindu kalay 300 Nowshera Pabbi Akbar Pura Spin Kanaray 22 Nowshera Pabbi Aman Kot Wapda coloney 40

Nowshera Pabbi Dag Behsud Charart rd gazgee mohala 180 Nowshera Pabbi Dag Behsud Colossi mahal 160 Nowshera Pabbi Dag Behsud Dagbehsud 2500 Nowshera Pabbi Dag Behsud Gazal maira 1750 Nowshera Pabbi Dag Behsud Ghazal maira 2500 Nowshera Pabbi Dag Behsud Maira 280 Nowshera Pabbi Dag Behsud Maira 125 Nowshera Pabbi Dag Ismail Khel dag Ismail khel 23 Nowshera Pabbi Dag Ismail Khel Rec 23 Dag Ismail Khel Nowshera Pabbi Chapri 10 100 Dag Ismail Khel Nowshera Pabbi Chapri wazir gari 10 Nowshera Pabbi Shah Kot Ahanait payan 105 Nowshera Pabbi Shah Kot Shahkot 8 Nowshera Pabbi Shah Kot Shahkot payan 105 Nowshera Pabbi Taru Jabba Jalozai 280 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Bazid Khel Africa Abbas Uc 49 50 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Bazid Khel Bars based khel 150 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Bazid Khel Champion colony Uc 49 20 Peshawar (Town- Khas Marozi .Uc 49 no goes Peshawar III) Bazid Khel coordinates from main road 15 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Bazid Khel Pad camp champion Uc 49 200 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Deh Bahadar Bala baggy stop 600 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Deh Bahadar Gusto nayab Khan 200 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Deh Bahadar Hagrid artas Muhammad 80 Peshawar (Town- Inquilabchili border of deh Bahadur n Peshawar III) Deh Bahadar nazis khel 17 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Deh Bahadar Latin town bilal town Uc 28 60 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Dheri Baghbanan Arab colony 200 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Dheri Baghbanan Gull gasht colony 45 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Dheri Baghbanan Kotla momin khan 18 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Dheri Baghbanan Makik easy Jhang kaly 49 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Dheri Baghbanan Rohani 100 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Hayatabad-I Phase 1 28 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Hayatabad-I Phase 1/44 20

Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Hayatabad-I Phase 1/44 20 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Hayatabad-I Street no 32, D4 ,phase 1 9 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Hayatabad-I Street no 32, D4 ,phase 1 9 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Hayatabad-II Hayatabad phase 1 sec d 1 180 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Hayatabad-II Industrial state 135 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Hayatabad-II Phase 1 sec d .04 160 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Hayatabad-II Phase 1 sec d .04 160 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Hayatabad-II Phase 1 sec e_1 90 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Hayatabad-II Phase_4 medical complex 120 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Hayatabad-II Phase_4 medical complex 120 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Landi Arbab Amin colony 230 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Landi Arbab Garhi sikander Khan 25 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Landi Arbab Garish sikandar Khan 200 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Landi Arbab Khass landi arbab 28 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Landi Arbab Khass landi arbab 12 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Landi Arbab Machine Garhi 125 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Landi Arbab Manakra 240 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Landi Arbab Unrest Abad 150 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Malkandheri Basir abad 500 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Malkandheri Ghulam nabi kalay 60 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Malkandheri Lakaraee kaneezah 200 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Malkandheri Malakandher 55 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Malkandheri Muhammad gull garhi 100 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Nothia Bautista Qadeem 175 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Nothia Gulbark colony ll 40 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Nothia Madani street arbab road 35 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Nothia Moh.tanedar.chamba pir road 70

Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Nothia Sarwar abad 20 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Nothia Talab Road Gulastan colony 90 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Nothia Jadeed Charkha khel 72 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Nothia Jadeed Gulberg no.1 90 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Nothia Jadeed Makik easy Jhang kaly 49 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Nothia Jadeed Masking abad 400 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Nothia Jadeed Usmania colony 48 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Palosi Mahdarzai 280 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Palosi Mahdarzai 10 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Palosi Musali garay 250 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Palosi Palosi talar zai 495 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Pawaka Aurangzeb near Bilal masjid 180 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Pawaka Bar abdara 400 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Pawaka pawakai village Uc 35 400 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Pawaka Speena waring,,,,uc 35 350 Peshawar (Town- Walkli Abad ,,,,,,Afridi Abad,,,,Uc 35 Peshawar III) Pawaka no goes 1200 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Pishtakhara Payan Hazrat baba 880 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Pishtakhara Payan Landing akhund abad 800 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Pishtakhara Payan Pishtakhara payan 320 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Pishtakhara Payan Shahidabad 560 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Pishtakhara Payan Waking abad 2400 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Regi Afte zai 32 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Regi Aftezai 110 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Regi Badi zai 260 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Regi Miskeen Abad 38 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Regi Sohkat abad 540 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Regi Sohkat abad 32

Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Regi Yousaf zai 215 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Sarband Mandewa 1200 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Sarband Mendae 600 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Sarband Mendawa 7 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Sarband Mindewa 600 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Sarband Safi khail 200 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Sarband Safi khail 200 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Sarband Sarband mendwa 13 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Sarband Sarband Nehar 100 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Shaheen Town Board colony 20 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Shaheen Town Garden abad 31 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Shaheen Town Jehangir abad 27 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Shaheen Town Near town police station 16 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Shaheen Town Shaheen town 55 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Sufaid Dheri Danish abad madina masjid 130 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Sufaid Dheri Kandii musakhel 70 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Sufaid Dheri Lande kandai 300 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Sufaid Dheri Nawa kalay 72 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Sufaid Dheri Sufaid dheri 48 Peshawar (Town- Dunham Abbas uc 40 opposite Peshawar III) Tehkal Bala regnant abad 20 Peshawar (Town- Govt primary school pop subhan Peshawar III) Tehkal Bala abbad camp uc 40 35 Peshawar (Town- Moan road near nazim hikes bar Peshawar III) Tehkal Bala takal Uc 40 80 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Tehkal Bala Shared Abbad uc 40 near warsik uc 1200 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Tehkal Payan-I Daudzai 17 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Tehkal Payan-I Gul Baba 35 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Tehkal Payan-I Haji khel uc 40 40 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Tehkal Payan-II Afzal abad 72

Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Tehkal Payan-II Ahmedzai 168 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Tehkal Payan-II Charmari 240 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Tehkal Payan-II Shahid abad 1200 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) Tehkal Payan-II Subhanabad road 55 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) University Town Abbas masjid lala zar colony 380 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) University Town Canal colony 155 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) University Town Gulshin colony arbab road 52 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) University Town Gulshin colony arbab road 52 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar III) University Town New town 28 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Aza Khel Zangi khel 9 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Badabare Harizai Badshah khel 120 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Badabare Harizai Mera mashogagar 1300 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Badabare Harizai Mera mashogagar 1300 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Badabare Harizai Qazi abad 1300 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Badabare Harizai Qazi abad 1300 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Badabare Harizai Spin jumat 900 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Badabare Maryamzai Balokhel payan 15 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Badabare Maryamzai Bin hazi 56 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Badabare Maryamzai Tuti khel 36 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Badabare Maryamzai Wakeel kalla,fida abad 250 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Badabare Maryamzai Wakeel kalla,fida abad 250 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Hazar Khwani-I Afridi abad 53 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Hazar Khwani-I Garhi lal badsha 1500 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Hazar Khwani-I Jamil garhi 36 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Hazar Khwani-I Moh.gujar abad 13 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Hazar Khwani-I Mph.saidan 34 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Hazar Khwani-I Shekhan garhi 30

Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Hazar Khwani-II Aji abad 18 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Hazar Khwani-II Dir colony 1800 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Hazar Khwani-II Ghari atta muhammad 630 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Hazar Khwani-II Gharib abad 90 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Hazar Khwani-II Sadozai 900 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Maira Kachori Balo gari 60 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Maira Kachori Jhagra 110 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Maira Kachori Maher gul 20 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Maira Kachori Maher gul 20 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Maira Kachori Malogo, secretory gharai 82 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Maira Kachori Zaheer abad 48 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Maira Kachori Zaheer abad 48 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Maira Surizai Payan Garhi Aziz Khan 180 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Maira Surizai Payan Garhi Mohammed Gul 75 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Maira Surizai Payan Garhi Mohammed Gul 75 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Maira Surizai Payan Garhi Sameen Shah 900 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Maira Surizai Payan Hazrat Shah Koroona 600 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Maira Surizai Payan Mata Bachay 400 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Maira Surizai Payan Shuga Bachay 400 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Maryamzai Maryamzai 45 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Maryamzai Maryamzai 33 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Maryamzai Miramzai 45 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Maryamzai Samabad 36 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Mashoogagar Afridi road 170 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Mashoogagar Haji khel 60 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Mashoogagar Haqim ghri 90 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Mashoogagar Khera khel 90

Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Mashoogagar Lodi khel 75 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Mashoogagar Sadiq akbar 85 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Mashoogagar Waqif ghri 30 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Mathani Ghaziabad 240 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Mathani Ghaziabad 240 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Mathani GOGE KHHEL KANDY 40 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Mathani MALI BANAL KANDY 120 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Mathani Near mahajar camp 320 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Mathani PALAUSA 250 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Musazai Phandu 135 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Musazai Umarkhel 135 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Sheikh Muhammadii haji khel 30 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Sheikh Muhammadii Kattu khel 180 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Sheikh Muhammadii Misry khel kandy 120 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Sheikh Muhammadii Patto khel 22 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Sheikh Muhammadii qazian 120 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Sheikhan Japan 7200 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Sheikhan Peeple kanday 4500 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Sheikhan Seikhan 4500 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Shirkira Adizai 340 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Shirkira Arhatbaba 520 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Shirkira Ghari.hajam 160 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Shirkira Malak,kaly 240 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Suleman Khel Bahadar khel 25 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Suleman Khel Kutwal 70 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Suleman Khel Moh katla khel 450 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Suleman Khel Moh. Sayda khel 30

Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Suleman Khel Moh.khan khel 96 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Surizai Bala Surizai(miskeen abad) 330 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Surizai Bala Surizaibala (sag jumat) 280 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Surizai Bala Telaban (inzaray) 60 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Surizai Bala Telaban(galib) 24 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Surizai Payan Baangara parghani chowk 220 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Surizai Payan Daandi pul 350 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Surizai Payan Meesken camp 530 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Surizai Payan Meets gaarhi feroz gul 500 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Surizai Payan Meets gaarhi feroz gul 500 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Surizai Payan Meets gaarhi feroz gul 500 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Surizai Payan Nukra khel 45 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Urmar Bala Chandan payan 110 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Urmar Bala Dheri baghbanan 240 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Urmar Bala Ouch nehr 210 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Urmar Bala Shamshatu 150 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Urmar Bala Urmer bala 115 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Urmar Miana Arhando khwarr 260 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Urmar Miana Bato stop 400 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Urmar Miana HAJI ABAD 17 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Urmar Miana Laisey 80 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Urmar Miana Mohalla shagi khel 105 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Urmar Miana Shada khan garai 120 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Urmar Miana Shaheen Shada Kali 26 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Urmar Miana Shaheen Shada Kali 26 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Urmar Miana Tohed abad nawi pul 90 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Urmar Miana Tohed abad nawi pul 90

Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Urmar Miana Zahir abad 300 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Urmar Miana Zaman abad 22 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Urmar Payan Arrandu khwar 220 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Urmar Payan Kuz kalay 42 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Urmar Payan Lessi 180 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Urmar Payan Mudar 44 Peshawar (Town- Peshawar IV) Urmar Payan Urmarhu myra 50

Questionnaire

Key Informants Interview

Survey Date: ______: Interviewer Name: ______

Host District: ______Host Tehsil:______: Host UC: ______, Host Village: ______Respondent Gender:

GPS Coordinates: ______, Respondent: (1= IDP, 2=Host Family, 3=both): ______

Consent: We are conducting a rapid survey of IDPs of the conflicted areas. We would like to ask you some questions about your IDPs in this community. The survey usually takes 20 minutes to complete.

ANY INFORMATION THAT YOU PROVIDE WILL BE KEPT STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL AND WILL NOT BE SHOWN TO OTHER PEOPLE. THIS IS VOLUNTARY AND YOU CAN CHOOSE NOT TO ANSWER ANY OR ALL OF THE QUESTIONS IF YOU WANT. HOWEVER, WE HOPE THAT YOU WILL PARTICIPATE SINCE YOUR VIEWS ARE IMPORTANT. DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? MAY WE BEGIN NOW?

1. IDPs Characteristics

1.1 How many recent conflict affected IDP Families live in this village: No of Households______, No. of People:______(Male______, Female______, Children

less than 2_____Children less than 5) ______1.2 When did IDPs arrive? 1= During last week, 2= one to two weeks, 3= two to four weeks, 4 = 1 month; ______(write code) 1.3 Are these IDPs registered? 1=Yes, 0= No, ______(write code) 1.3.1 If not registered, reasons? (______) 1=lacking/No CNIC, 2=Problem in CNIC 3=cannot reach jalozai, 4=lines too long at jalozi 1.4 Tehsil Origin Tehsil of the IDPs? 1=Bara Numbers: ______2=Landi Kotal Numbers: ______3.Jamrod Numbers: ______1.5 Tribes of the IDPs? Multiple codes Use code below: ______1=Shalobar Qambar Khel, 2=Aka khel, 3=Malikdin Khel, 4=Kamar Khel, 5=Sepah, 6=Stori Khel, 7=Bar Qambar Khel, 8=Zaka Khel 1.6 How many IDPs are living? WITH Host Families: ______, In Schools______Other Public Building: ______, Open air: ______, Rented: _____Others (specify): ______1.7 Did the IDPs receive any assistance: (0=No , 1: Govt, 2=NGOs, 3= UN, 4= Local Food(_____), Health(_____), Water (____), Shelter (____), NFI (___) philanthropists,) (write one code for each category) 1.8 When do you think the IDPs will return to (_____) their origin? Use one code

1= within a month, 2=1-3 months, 3=>than 3 months, 4=return already started, 5=Don’t know, 2. Health

2.1 Is there any functional Health Facility? BHU (____), RHC (____), Civil Despensary (_____), Private Clinic (____) Others (Specify): 0= No, 1= yes ______

2.2 Have IDPs children under the age of 15 (_____) received polio vaccination?

1=Yes, 0=No

2.3 Have IDPs children under the age of 15 (_____) 1=Yes, 0=No received EPI vaccination? (Single select)

2.4 Whether your children of age less than one |____|

year have food problem? 1=yes, 0=No 3. WASH

3.1 What is the primary source of drinking (______), (______) 1=Water not available, 2=Tap Water, 3=Tube Well, 4=Spring, 5=River/ canal/ pond/ stream, water in this village? 6=Surface water/ paddy field, 7=Hand pump, 8=Tanker, 9=Rain water, 10=Water system inside the home, 11=Water system with a communal fountain, 12=Traditional well/ Ring well, =13Others 3.2 What toilet facilities are available for the IDPs in this village? (______)

1= Pour flush, 2=Dry pit laterines, 3=Open defecation, 4=Others: 4. Problem and Needs

4.1 What are the two main problems that host families face with regard to hosting IDPs? (use code in order of priority) Use Code below: 1=(___), 2=(____)

1=Inadequate food, 2= shelter, 3=Inadequate income, 4=Security, 5=inadequate sanitation, 6=Others (specify)______

4.2 What are the immediate needs? (Put 1 for most important need, 2 for 1=Food (____), 2=Health (____), 3=Water( ____) 3=Shelter (____) second...etc) 4.3 Is there any source of income for the IDPs Use Code below: (______) in living in this village? 1= None, 2=Wage labour, 3=Petty trade, 4=Others (specify)______

5. Protection

5.1 What are the known danger zones in this 1=(____), 2=(____), 3=(______) community where women and children are at increased risk for violence? 1=In transit to market, 2=While using public transit, 3=Wter collection points, 4=Bathing points, 5=While working in the field, 6=In the health facility, 7=Market, 8=In transit to school, 9=School, 10=none, 11=Don’t know 5.2 Are you aware of any of any particular threats to women or girls in this situation? |__), |___|, |___| Multiples codes 1=Physical violence, 2=Verbal abuse, 3=Early marriages, 4=Social discrimination,5=Domestic Violence, 6=harassment, 7=lack of awareness of humanrigts, 8None, 9=Donth Know

Other 5.3 What insecurities or vulnerabilities have |___|, |___||____|, |___| your child/children faced during Physicial distress, 2=change in behavior and attidue, 3= No play area, 4= Not able to go displacement? Multiple select) outside, 5= Feeling frightened and insecure, 6= Having to walk too far for water or food distribution, 7=Fear at family inability to earn a livelihood, 8=Anxious at family being separated – leaving home, 9=Strangers wanting to talk to my child or children, 10=Restricted movement, 11=Illness, 12=Fear of kidnapping, 13=Fear of abuse, 14=None 6. Education

6.1 Do your children attend school? Use code below (____) 1=yes, 0=No 6.1.1 If No, reasons? Use code below (_____), (_____), (____)

1=Culture issues, 2=School at longer distance, 3=No separate school for girls, 4=School is not secure, 5=Need children for domestic work, 6=Child labor/ Children are earning money, 7=Have no money for school fee, 8=Have no books/copies etc, 9=Have no uniform,

10=Children were denied admission because they are IDPs, 11=Goes to Madrassa, 12=Gender discrimination, 13=Child himself/ herself do not consider it important, 14=Parent consider their child is underage

Is there any focal point in your village? Name: ______Who is this person? Contact Number? (optional) Title: ______

Contact Number: ______

Signature: ______

Core IARA Partner Agencies

1. International Organization for Migration (IOM)

2. World Food Programme (WFP)

3. IDP’s Vulnerability Assessment and Profiling (IVAP)

Support Partner Agencies

1. United Nation’s International Children’s Education Fund (UNICEF)

2. Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC)

3. Save the Children Fund (SCF)

4. Agency for Technical Cooperation and Development (ACTED)

5. Centre of Excellence for Rural Development (CERD)

6. Society for Skills Training Development (SSTD)

7. Basic Education and Employable Skills (BEST)

8. Lawari Humanitarian Organization (LHO)

9. United Nation’s Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA)

10. Provincial Disaster Management Authority (PDMA)