Domains of Convergence in Infinite Dimensional Holomorphy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Domains of Convergence in Infinite Dimensional Holomorphy Domains of convergence in infinite dimensional holomorphy Von der Fakult¨at f¨urMathematik und Naturwissenschaften der Carl von Ossietzky Universit¨atOldenburg zur Erlangung des Grades und Titels eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) angenommene Dissertation von Christopher Prengel geboren am 28.10.1975 in Hannover Gutachter: apl. Prof. Dr. A. Defant Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. P. Pflug Tag der Disputation: 26.10.2005 Abstract For certain subsets F(R) of holomorphic functions on a Reinhardt domain m R in a Banach sequence space X, mainly for H∞(R), P (X) and P(X), we give precise descriptions of the domain of convergence dom F(R), i.e. the set of all points of R where the monomial expansion X ∂αf(0) zα α! (N) α∈N0 of every function f ∈ F(R) is (unconditionally) convergent. The results are obtained by an interplay of complex analysis and local Banach space theory, improving work of Ryan and Lempert about monomial expan- sions of holomorphic functions on `1 and using methods from the theory of multidimensional Bohr radii. The problem of conditional convergence is solved for polynomials. It is closely connected with bases for full and symmetric tensor products and convergence preserving permutations. Zusammenfassung F¨urgewisse Teilmengen F(R) holomorpher Funktionen auf einem Reinhardt- m gebiet R in einem Banachfolgenraum X, vor allem f¨ur H∞(R), P (X) und P(X), geben wir eine genaue Beschreibung des Konvergenzbereichs dom F(R), d.h. der Menge aller Punkte aus R, in denen die Monomial- entwicklung X ∂αf(0) zα α! (N) α∈N0 einer jeden Funktion f ∈ F(R) (unbedingt) konvergiert. Die Resultate werden durch ein Zusammenspiel von komplexer Analysis und lokaler Banachraumtheorie erzielt, setzen Arbeiten von Ryan und Lempert ¨uber Monomialentwicklungen holomorpher Funktionen auf `1 fort und bedie- nen sich der Theorie mehrdimensionaler Bohrradien. Das Problem bedingter Konvergenz wird f¨urPolynome gel¨ost. Es ist eng verkn¨upft mit Basen f¨urvolle und symmetrische Tensorprodukte und kon- vergenzerhaltenden Permutationen. I thank my supervisor Andreas Defant for his guidance during the preparation of this thesis. Gracias a Manuel Maestre por las discusi´ones ´utilesy por su invitaci´ona Va- lencia. Tambi´ena todas las personas que hac´ıan que mi estancia in Valencia fuera muy agradable, especialmente Pilar y su familia, Pablo y Marta, y por supuesto Manolo. Thank you Melissa for correcting my English. Contents Introduction 9 Preliminaries 15 1. Norm estimates of identities between symmetric tensor products of Banach se- quence spaces 25 Identities between symmetric and full tensor products ............. 26 Volume estimates for unit balls of spaces of m-homogeneous polynomials ... 31 `-norm estimates for the injective and projective tensor product ........ 33 Volume ratio of m-fold tensor products .................... 44 2. Domains of convergence 51 Domains of convergence of holomorphic functions ............... 51 Lower inclusions for dom H∞(R) ....................... 65 The arithmetic Bohr radius .......................... 75 Upper inclusions for dom H∞(R) ...................... 84 A description of dom Pm(X) ........................ 89 A conjecture ................................. 93 The domain of convergence of the polynomials ................. 105 The exceptional role of `1 ........................... 107 Domains of convergence, Bohr radii and unconditionality ........... 113 3. Tensor and s-tensor orders 119 Orders on Nm ................................. 121 Orders for tensor products ........................... 130 Examples ................................... 134 Bases for symmetric tensor products and spaces of polynomials ........ 167 Pointwise convergence ............................. 170 Bibliography 174 Introduction A holomorphic function f on a Reinhardt domain R in Cn has a power series expansion X α f(z) = cα(f)z n α∈N0 ∂αf(0) with coefficients cα(f) = α! that converges to f in every point of R. In infinite dimensions, if f is holomorphic on a Reinhardt domain R in a ∂αf(0) Banach sequence space X and we define cα(f) := α! then X α f(z) = cα(f)z (N) α∈N0 holds for finite sequences z = (z1, . , zn, 0,...) ∈ R and we ask: Where on R does this monomial expansion series converge? We call the set dom(f) of all those points the domain of convergence of f. In this thesis we give precise descriptions of the domain of convergence \ dom F(R) = dom(f) f∈F(R) of certain subsets F(R) ⊂ H(R) of holomorphic functions. Historically the problem that we consider here is connected with the defini- tion of holomorphy in infinite dimensions. Holomorphy in finite dimensions can be characterized by convergence of monomial expansion series in the neighbourhood of every point and it was this approach that Hilbert tried at the beginning of the 20th century. In [46] he proposed a theory of analytic functions in infinitely many variables based on representations by power series X α cαz (0.1) (N) α∈N0 (absolutely) convergent on infinite dimensional polydiscs |z1| ≤ ε1, |z2| ≤ ε2, |z3| ≤ ε3,... (0.2) 10 Introduction where (εn) is a sequence of positive numbers. In the following years it became clear by the work of Fr´echet and Gˆateaux that expansions in power series of homogeneous polynomials are more suit- able, which formally can be obtained from (0.1) by building blocks X α X X α cαz = cαz (N) m |α|=m α∈N0 This theory was continued by students of Fr´echet. The current form for functions between normed spaces can be found in papers of Graves [43] and Taylor [75, 76] from the mid 1930’s, where the equivalence of Fr´echet differ- entiability, Gˆateaux differentiability plus continuity, and representation by a power series of homogeneous polynomials in the neighbourhood of every point is proved. A natural environment where it is possible to work with monomial expansions are fully nuclear locally convex spaces with basis, as was shown in 1978 by Boland and Dineen [15], see [35], [37] and [36, sec. 3.3, 4.5] for more results in this direction. Matos [60] characterized those holomorphic functions on an open subset of a Banach space with unconditional basis having monomial series representa- tions in the neighbourhood of every point to be functions of a certain holo- morphy type (see also [61]). He proved that in `1 these are all holomorphic functions. As we will see, the space `1 plays a special role in our theory. In some sense the results we give in this thesis justify the historical devel- opment. One problem with the Hilbert approach is that his definition is more restrictive than he actually thought. He gives us a criterion to de- cide if a power series (0.1) defines an analytic function in the domain (0.2). He claims that it is sufficient for the series to be bounded in the follow- P α ing sense: Every finite dimensional section n cαz of (0.1) (putting α∈N0 the variables zn+1, zn+2, zn+3,... equal to zero and identifying (α1, . , αn) = (N) (α1, . , αn, 0, 0,...) ∈ N0 ) is convergent for |z1| ≤ ε1,..., |zn| ≤ εn and X α sup sup cαz < ∞ (0.3) n∈N |zi|≤εi n α∈N0 It can be seen from an example of Bohnenblust and Hille [12] that this is not true (see example 2.4 and also p. 12 below). But our results even show, extending Hilbert’s definition of boundedness in an appropriate way (see remark 2.9), that `1 is almost the only Banach sequence space where the criterion is true. Nevertheless it is remarkable here that a power series (0.1) satisfying (0.3) with all εn equal, say, to r > 0 defines a bounded holomorphic function on rBc0 in the current sense (remark 2.9). Introduction 11 The roots of our results can be found in the work of Harald Bohr at the beginning of the 20th century. He studied Dirichlet series X an (0.4) ns n where an are complex coefficients and s is a complex variable. The domains where such a series converges absolutely, uniformly or conditionally are half planes [Re s > σ0] where σ0 = a, u or c is called the abscissa of absolute, uniform or conditional convergence respectively. More precisely σ0 = inf σ taken over all σ ∈ R such that on [Re s > σ] we have convergence of the requested type. Bohr wanted to know the greatest possible width T of the strip of uniform but non absolute convergence over all Dirichlet series (0.4): 6 uniform convergence - absolute convergence - - T = sup a − u P an ns u a He attacked this problem using the nowadays so called Bohr method (see [13]). Using the fundamental theorem of arithmetic he established a one to one correspondence between Dirichlet series and power series in infinitely many variables, given by X an X α c z , c = a α (0.5) ns ! α α p n (N) α∈N0 where p = (pn) is the sequence of prime numbers p1 < p2 < p3 < . Then he defined S to be the least upper bound of all q > 0 such that P α P α |cα| ε < ∞ for every power series cαz bounded in Hilbert sense on |zn| ≤ 1, i.e. with X α sup sup cα z < ∞ (0.6) n |zi|≤1 n α∈N0 and every ε ∈ `q ∩ ] 0 , 1[ N and used the prime number theorem to prove 1 T = (0.7) S Thus Bohr shifted the problem to the setting of bounded power series in infinitely many variables and he was able to prove S ≥ 2 ([13, Satz III]): 12 Introduction P α Theorem 0.1. Let cαz be a power series bounded in the domain [|zi| ≤ 1] and ε ∈ `2 ∩ ] 0 , 1[ N. Then X α |cα| ε < ∞ (N) α∈N0 Bohr did not know if 2 was the exact value of S, not even if S < ∞ (i.e.
Recommended publications
  • Functions of a Complex Variable II Math 562, Spring 2020
    Functions of a Complex Variable II Math 562, Spring 2020 Jens Lorenz April 27, 2020 Department of Mathematics and Statistics, UNM, Albuquerque, NM 87131 Contents 1 Notations 5 2 The Schwarz Lemma and Aut(D) 6 2.1 Schwarz Lemma . .6 2.2 Biholomorphic Maps and Automorphisms . .7 2.3 The Automorphism Group of D ...................7 2.4 The Schwarz{Pick Lemma . .9 2.5 Remarks . 11 3 Linear Fractional Transformations and the Riemann Sphere 12 3.1 The Riemann Sphere . 12 3.2 Linear Fractional Transformations . 14 3.3 The Automorphisms of the Riemann Sphere . 16 3.4 A Remarkable Geometric Property of Linear Fractional Trans- formations . 17 3.4.1 Analytical Description of Circles . 18 3.4.2 Circles under Reciprocation . 18 3.4.3 Straight Lines under Reciprocation . 20 3.5 Example: The Cayley Transform in the Complex Plane . 21 3.6 The Cayley Transform of a Matrix . 22 4 The Riemann Mapping Theorem 24 4.1 Statement and Overview of Proof . 24 4.2 The Theorem of Arzela{Ascoli . 26 4.3 Montel's Theorem . 29 4.4 Auxiliary Results on Logarithms and Square Roots . 32 4.5 Construction of a Map in ..................... 33 4.6 A Bound of f 0(P ) for all Ff .................. 35 4.7 Application ofj thej Theorems2 of F Montel and Hurwitz . 36 4.8 Proof That f is Onto . 37 1 4.9 Examples of Biholomorphic Mappings . 39 5 An Introduction to Schwarz–Christoffel Formulas 41 5.1 General Power Functions . 41 5.2 An Example of a Schwarz–Christoffel Map .
    [Show full text]
  • Power Series, Analyticity and Elementary Functions
    MATH 566 LECTURE NOTES 2: POWER SERIES, ANALYTICITY AND ELEMENTARY FUNCTIONS TSOGTGEREL GANTUMUR 1. Uniform and normal convergences For a set Ω ⊆ C and a function f :Ω ! C, we define the uniform norm kfkΩ = sup jfj: Ω We say that a sequence ffkg of functions fk :Ω ! C converges uniformly in Ω to f, if kfk − fkΩ ! 0 as k ! 1. Recall that this is equivalent to the sequence ffkg being a Cauchy sequence, i.e., kfk − f`kΩ ! 0 as k; ` ! 1. P P Theorem 1 (Weierstrass M-test). If gn :Ω ! C and n kgnkΩ < 1, then the series n gn converges uniformly in Ω. P Proof. With fk = n≤k gn, we have for ` < k X X X kfk − f`kΩ = k gnkΩ ≤ kgnkΩ ≤ kgnkΩ; `<n≤k `<n≤k n>` which tends to 0 when ` ! 1. So ffkg is a Cauchy sequence, hence converges. P n ¯ Example 2. The geometric series n z converges uniformly in Dr (and also in Dr) as long n as r < 1. To be pedantic, with r < 1 and with functions gn : Dr ! C given by gn(z) = z , P the series n gn converges uniformly in Dr. However, the convergence is not uniform in the P n open unit disk D1, and n z does not converge if jzj ≥ 1. Convergence behaviour of frequently occurring sequences in complex analysis can be cap- tured conveniently by the notion of locally uniform convergence. Recall that U ⊆ Ω is a neighbourhood of z 2 Ω in Ω if there is an open set V ⊆ C such that z 2 V \ Ω ⊆ U.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Functional Analysis
    Appalachian State University Department of Mathematics Ralph Chikhany Introduction to Functional Analysis c 2015 A Directed Research Paper in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts May 2015 Approved: Dr William J Cook Member Dr William C Bauldry Member Contents Introduction 1 1 Metric Spaces 3 1.1 Definition and Examples . .3 1.2 Underlying Topology . .6 1.3 Convergence and Continuity . .9 1.4 Completeness and Completion . 11 1.5 Compactness . 15 2 Banach Spaces 18 2.1 Normed Vector Spaces . 18 2.1.1 Vector Spaces . 18 2.1.2 Normed Spaces . 19 2.1.3 Bounded Linear Operators . 22 2.2 Banach Spaces . 24 2.2.1 Introduction to Differential Equations in Banach Spaces . 25 2.3 Linear Functionals and Duality . 28 3 Hilbert Spaces 31 3.1 Inner Product Spaces and Orthogonality . 31 3.2 Hilbert Spaces . 35 3.3 Orthonormal Sequences and Bases . 38 3.4 Representation Theorems . 41 3.5 Special Operators . 44 3.6 Weak-Weak∗ Topologies and Convergence . 48 Bibliography 51 Introduction Functional Analysis was founded at the beginning of the 20th century to provide a general abstract domain for some problems, namely from physics, where the issue was finding functions verifying certain properties. With this incentive in mind, functional analysis can be perceived as the study of function spaces. To place this field in relation to differential and integral calculus, we can classify the study of functions in three levels, from the most elementary to the abstract: The first level consists of studying properties of individual functions, namely their domain, extremas, concavity, asymptotes..
    [Show full text]
  • Explorations in Harmonic Analysis with Applications to Complex Function Theory and the Heisenberg Group
    Explorations in Harmonic Analysis with Applications to Complex Function Theory and the Heisenberg Group by Steven G. Krantz with the assistance of Lina Lee August 16, 2007 To the memory of Alberto P. Cald´eron. Table of Contents Preface v 1 Ontology and History of Real Analysis 1 1.1 DeepBackgroundinReal AnalyticFunctions. 2 1.2 The Idea of Fourier Expansions . 4 1.3 Differences of the Real Analytic Theory and the Fourier Theory 6 1.4 ModernDevelopments . .. ... .. .. .. .. ... .. .. 7 1.5 WaveletsandBeyond.. .. ... .. .. .. .. ... .. .. 8 1.6 HistoryandGenesisofFourierSeries . 9 1.6.1 DerivationoftheHeatEquation. 12 2 Advanced Ideas: The Hilbert Transform 17 2.1 TheNotionoftheHilbertTransform . 18 2.1.1 TheGutsoftheHilbertTransform . 20 2.1.2 The Laplace Equation and Singular integrals on RN . 22 2.1.3 Boundedness of the Hilbert Transform . 24 2.1.4 Lp Boundedness of the Hilbert Transform . 32 2.2 TheModifiedHilbertTransform . 33 3 Essentials of the Fourier Transform 41 3.1 Essential Properties of the Fourier Transform . 42 3.2 InvarianceandSymmetryProperties . 44 3.3 Convolution and Fourier Inversion . 50 3.4 QuadraticIntegralsandPlancherel . 58 3.5 SobolevSpaceBasics . 61 i ii 4 Fourier Multipliers 71 4.1 BasicsofFractionalIntegrals. 72 4.2 The Concept of Singular Integrals . 74 4.3 Prolegomena to Pseudodifferential Operators . 77 5 Fractional and Singular Integrals 79 5.1 Fractional and Singular Integrals Together . 80 5.2 FractionalIntegrals . 82 5.3 Background to Singular Integrals . 85 5.4 MoreonIntegralOperators . 93 6 Several Complex Variables 95 6.1 Plurisubharmonic Functions . 96 6.2 Fundamentals of Holomorphic Functions . 103 6.3 NotionsofConvexity . .106 6.3.1 The Analytic Definition of Convexity .
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture Notes on Several Complex Variables
    Lecture notes on several complex variables Harold P. Boas Draft of December 3, 2013 Contents 1 Introduction1 1.1 Power series.....................................2 1.2 Integral representations...............................3 1.3 Partial differential equations............................3 1.4 Geometry......................................4 2 Power series6 2.1 Domain of convergence...............................6 2.2 Characterization of domains of convergence....................7 2.3 Elementary properties of holomorphic functions.................. 11 2.4 The Hartogs phenomenon.............................. 12 2.5 Natural boundaries................................. 14 2.6 Summary: domains of convergence........................ 22 2.7 Separate holomorphicity implies joint holomorphicity............... 23 3 Holomorphic mappings 27 3.1 Fatou–Bieberbach domains............................. 27 3.1.1 Example.................................. 28 3.1.2 Theorem.................................. 30 3.2 Inequivalence of the ball and the bidisc...................... 31 3.3 Injectivity and the Jacobian............................. 32 3.4 The Jacobian conjecture.............................. 35 4 Convexity 37 4.1 Real convexity.................................... 37 4.2 Convexity with respect to a class of functions................... 38 4.2.1 Polynomial convexity............................ 39 4.2.2 Linear and rational convexity........................ 44 4.2.3 Holomorphic convexity........................... 47 4.2.4 Pseudoconvexity.............................
    [Show full text]
  • Linear and Algebraic Structures in Function Sequence Spaces
    UNIVERSIDAD DE SEVILLA Facultad de Matem´aticas Departamento de An´alisisMatem´atico LINEAR AND ALGEBRAIC STRUCTURES IN FUNCTION SEQUENCE SPACES Memoria presentada por Pablo Jos´eGerlach Mena para optar al grado de Doctor por la Universidad de Sevilla. Ma del Carmen Calder´onMoreno Jos´eAntonio Prado Bassas Prof. Titular Universidad Prof. Titular Universidad Dpto. An´alisis Matem´atico Dpto. An´alisisMatem´atico Universidad de Sevilla Universidad de Sevilla V◦ B◦ de la Directora V◦ B◦ del Director Sevilla, Febrero de 2020 Contents Resumen vii Abstract ix Introduction xi 1 Preliminaries 1 1.1 Basic concepts and definitions . .1 1.2 Some classical spaces . .3 1.2.1 Continuous functions . .3 1.2.2 Sequence spaces . .4 1.2.3 The space L0(X; µ).........................6 1.2.4 Lp(X; µ) spaces of functions for 1 ≤ p < +1 ...........7 1.2.5 L1(X; µ) space of functions . .7 1.3 Topology of sequence spaces . .9 i Contents Lin. Alg. Struc. Func. Seq. Spaces 2 Lineability 15 2.1 Introduction . 15 2.2 Main definitions . 16 2.3 On the relation between lineability, spaceability and denseness . 18 3 Modes of convergence 27 3.1 Definitions and relations between convergences . 27 3.2 Counterexamples on the reciprocals . 32 4 Lineability and modes of convergence 41 4.1 Measure vs. Pointwise a.e. Convergence . 42 4.1.1 Algebrability and spaceability . 48 4.2 Pointwise vs. Uniform Convergence . 54 4.2.1 Definitions and first examples . 54 4.2.2 Lineability results . 57 5 The space L1([0; +1)) 61 5.1 Convergence in L1(X; µ).........................
    [Show full text]