Default Report Planning - Affordable Housing January 16, 2020 12:31 PM MST

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Default Report Planning - Affordable Housing January 16, 2020 12:31 PM MST Default Report Planning - Affordable Housing January 16, 2020 12:31 PM MST Q2 - Please click on the map where you live. Q2 - Please click on the map where you live. - Regions University of Utah University Gardens East Central Yalecrest Wasatch Hollow Sugar House East Liberty Park Liberty Wells Central City Ballpark Central 9th Downtown Glendale Poplar Grove Fairpark Jordan Meadows Westpointe Rose Park Region #19 Avenues Federal Heights/Greater Aves Foothill/Sunnyside Bonneville Hills Sunnyside East East Bench Other 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Q3 - Do you rent? Yes No 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 # Field Minimum Maximum Mean Std Deviation Variance Count 1 Do you rent? 1.00 2.00 1.67 0.47 0.22 1,844 # Field Choice Count 1 Yes 33.46% 617 2 No 66.54% 1227 1844 Showing rows 1 - 3 of 3 Q4 - How long have you lived at your current residence? Less than 1 year 1 year 2-5 years 6-10 years +10 years 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 # Field Minimum Maximum Mean Std Deviation Variance Count 1 How long have you lived at your current residence? 1.00 5.00 2.49 1.46 2.14 612 # Field Choice Count 1 Less than 1 year 29.58% 181 5 1 year 20.10% 123 2 2-5 years 36.44% 223 3 6-10 years 9.15% 56 4 +10 years 4.74% 29 612 Showing rows 1 - 6 of 6 Q5 - When do you anticipate moving to another residence? 1-2 years 3-5 years +5 years No plans to move 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 # Field Minimum Maximum Mean Std Deviation Variance Count 1 When do you anticipate moving to another residence? 1.00 4.00 1.71 1.16 1.35 616 # Field Choice Count 1 1-2 years 67.86% 418 2 3-5 years 12.01% 74 3 +5 years 1.62% 10 4 No plans to move 18.51% 114 616 Showing rows 1 - 5 of 5 Q6 - What percent of your monthly income (before taxes) do you pay towards housing (rent or mortgage payment)? 30% or less 31-50% More than 50% 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 Std # Field Minimum Maximum Mean Variance Count Deviation What percent of your monthly income (before taxes) do you pay 1 1.00 3.00 1.51 0.67 0.44 1,820 towards housing (rent or mortgage payment)? # Field Choice Count 1 30% or less 59.07% 1075 2 31-50% 31.26% 569 3 More than 50% 9.67% 176 1820 Showing rows 1 - 4 of 4 Q7 - Based on your experience, how affordable do you think housing is in Salt Lake City? Very affordable Somewhat affordable Not affordable 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Std # Field Minimum Maximum Mean Variance Count Deviation Based on your experience, how affordable do you think housing is 1 1.00 3.00 2.52 0.57 0.32 1,670 in Salt Lake City? # Field Choice Count 1 Very affordable 3.71% 62 2 Somewhat affordable 40.18% 671 3 Not affordable 56.11% 937 1670 Showing rows 1 - 4 of 4 Q8 - Do you feel that affordable housing benefits the community? Yes No I don’t know 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 # Field Minimum Maximum Mean Std Deviation Variance Count 1 Do you feel that affordable housing benefits the community? 1.00 3.00 1.22 0.58 0.33 1,667 # Field Choice Count 1 Yes 85.78% 1430 2 No 6.30% 105 3 I don’t know 7.92% 132 1667 Showing rows 1 - 4 of 4 Q9 - Affordable housing can come in many forms. What types of housing do you think fit in your neighborhood? (select all that apply) Tiny House Single-family High density multi-family (50 or more units per acre) Accessory Dwelling Unit (in backyard of single family home) Duplex Co-living/single room occupancy (single room with shared kitchen and bath) Medium density multi-family (30-50 units per acre) Townhouse Cottage 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 # Field Choice Count 6 Tiny House 10.71% 840 1 Single-family 16.08% 1261 5 High density multi-family (50 or more units per acre) 7.01% 550 8 Accessory Dwelling Unit (in backyard of single family home) 12.09% 948 2 Duplex 15.50% 1216 9 Co-living/single room occupancy (single room with shared kitchen and bath) 5.81% 456 4 Medium density multi-family (30-50 units per acre) 8.53% 669 3 Townhouse 12.26% 962 # Field Choice Count 7 Cottage 12.01% 942 7844 Showing rows 1 - 10 of 10 Q10 - Do you feel that there is enough affordable housing in Salt Lake City? Yes No I don’t know 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 Std # Field Minimum Maximum Mean Variance Count Deviation Do you feel that there is enough affordable housing in Salt Lake 1 1.00 3.00 2.02 0.41 0.17 1,668 City? # Field Choice Count 1 Yes 7.61% 127 2 No 82.85% 1382 3 I don’t know 9.53% 159 1668 Showing rows 1 - 4 of 4 Q11 - Do you feel there is enough affordable housing in your neighborhood? Yes No I don’t know 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 Std # Field Minimum Maximum Mean Variance Count Deviation Do you feel there is enough affordable housing in your 1 1.00 3.00 1.93 0.58 0.34 1,663 neighborhood? # Field Choice Count 1 Yes 20.57% 342 2 No 65.66% 1092 3 I don’t know 13.77% 229 1663 Showing rows 1 - 4 of 4 Q12 - What areas in Salt Lake City do you think have the biggest need for more affordable housing? (select all that apply) Avenues Capitol Hill Central Community Downtown East Bench Northwest Sugar House Westside 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 # Field Choice Count 1 Avenues 12.97% 964 2 Capitol Hill 11.70% 870 3 Central Community 14.23% 1058 5 Downtown 15.03% 1117 6 East Bench 12.48% 928 7 Northwest 9.19% 683 9 Sugar House 14.81% 1101 10 Westside 9.58% 712 7433 Showing rows 1 - 9 of 9 Q13 - Rank from 1-7 the most effective way (1 being the most effective and 7 the least effective) to address the supply and location of affordable housing? (Click/tap & drag into the order you prefer. 1 being at the top) 1 2 3 Permit greater residential density than is currently allowed Allow for additional building height Remove aesthetic building design and materials standards 4 Zone more land in Salt Lake City for multifamily housing Focus affordable housing near transit routes Require less parking Reduce landscaping requirements 5 6 7 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 # Field Minimum Maximum Mean Std Deviation Variance Count 1 Permit greater residential density than is currently allowed 1.00 7.00 3.12 1.80 3.26 1,599 2 Allow for additional building height 1.00 7.00 3.79 1.77 3.12 1,599 3 Remove aesthetic building design and materials standards 1.00 7.00 5.34 1.55 2.41 1,599 4 Zone more land in Salt Lake City for multifamily housing 1.00 7.00 3.10 1.60 2.57 1,599 5 Focus affordable housing near transit routes 1.00 7.00 2.54 1.64 2.69 1,599 6 Require less parking 1.00 7.00 4.85 1.77 3.12 1,599 7 Reduce landscaping requirements 1.00 7.00 5.28 1.71 2.91 1,595 # Field 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Permit greater residential density 1 22.33% 357 21.26% 340 20.76% 332 14.51% 232 7.32% 117 6.94% 111 6.88% 110 than is currently allowed Allow for additional 2 11.01% 176 16.39% 262 17.64% 282 20.51% 328 15.70% 251 9.94% 159 8.82% 141 building height Remove aesthetic 3 building design and 2.25% 36 3.63% 58 8.13% 130 12.13% 194 20.39% 326 25.08% 401 28.39% 454 materials standards Zone more land in 4 Salt Lake City for 18.32% 293 22.58% 361 21.45% 343 17.89% 286 10.94% 175 5.75% 92 3.06% 49 multifamily housing Focus affordable 5 housing near transit 38.65% 618 19.51% 312 14.01% 224 13.07% 209 9.07% 145 3.44% 55 2.25% 36 routes 6 Require less parking 4.32% 69 9.51% 152 10.07% 161 12.70% 203 21.70% 347 19.95% 319 21.76% 348 # Field 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Reduce landscaping 7 3.07% 49 7.15% 114 7.90% 126 9.15% 146 14.92% 238 28.97% 462 28.84% 460 requirements Showing rows 1 - 7 of 7 Q14 - Do you agree with the following statement? Affordable housing should be located in all neighborhoods. Yes No 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 Std # Field Minimum Maximum Mean Variance Count Deviation Do you agree with the following statement? Affordable housing 1 1.00 2.00 1.22 0.41 0.17 1,552 should be located in all neighborhoods.
Recommended publications
  • Joint Ushe Board of Regents / Boards of Trustees Southern Utah University R
    JOINT USHE BOARD OF REGENTS / BOARDS OF TRUSTEES SOUTHERN UTAH UNIVERSITY R. HAZE HUNTER CONFERENCE CENTER THURSDAY, AUGUST 1, 2019 (Dress: Business Casual) AGENDA 9:30 AM – 10:30 AM AUDIT COMMITTEE TRAINING Invited Regents and Trustees Location: Yankee Meadows 10:30 AM – 12:30 PM WELCOME – CHAIR SIMMONS BOARD MEMBERSHIP TRAINING Kevin P. Reilly President Emeritus & Regent Professor, University of Wisconsin System Senior Fellow, Association of Governing Boards of Universities & Colleges Location: Great Hall 12:30 PM – 1:00 PM Lunch 1:00 PM – 2:00 PM UPDATE ON THE HIGHER EDUCATION STRATEGIC PLANNING COMMISSION F. Ann Millner Utah State Senator Past President of Weber State University (2002-2012). Regents Professor Location: Great Hall 2:00 PM – 2:15 PM Break 2:15 PM – 4:45 PM FACILITATED DISCUSSION ON THE FUTURE OF HIGHER EDUCATION Kimbal L. Wheatley Organizational Development Expert, Facilitator Flexner Wheatley Associates Location: Great Hall DINNER AND SHAKESPEARE 5:15 PM Reception (appetizers, refreshments, music) Location: Patio 6:00 PM Dinner 7:00 PM The Green Show 8:00 PM Theater Performance (Hamlet or Book of Will) USHE BOARD OF REGENTS SOUTHERN UTAH UNIVERSITY R HAZE HUNTER CONFERENCE CENTER FRIDAY, AUGUST 2, 2019 AMENDED AGENDA 8:00 AM – 9:20 AM BREAKFAST MEETING – STATE BOARD OF REGENTS, SOUTHERN UTAH UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES, PRESIDENT WYATT, COMMISSIONER WOOLSTENHULME Discussion and Executive Session (if needed) Location: Charles Hunter Room 9:20 AM – 9:30 AM TRANSITIONAL BREAK 9:30 AM – 10:00 AM Executive Session (if needed) Location: Yankee Meadows 10:00 AM – 12:00 PM COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE Location: Great Hall 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Residential Research
    RESIDENTIAL RESEARCH THE DOWNSIZING LIFESTYLE TREND TOWARDS LUXURY APARTMENT LIVING Rightsizing beyond 2020 -Page 2 Dwelling migration routes The strong demand from downsizers Rightsizing also appeals to younger -Page 3 seeking easily maintainable prime generations, and we see this at a much properties close to city centre locations earlier stage than in previous years given Buyer profile of prime apartments has been identified as one of nine global the agile, transient and global nature of -Page 4 trends being monitored over the coming our work and play. years, as identified in the Knight Frank Prime Global Forecast 2020. Apartment living allows for low Trends in prime apartments maintenance living when at home, -Page 5 When working with our clients, many tell convenience of concierge and the ability us their home is no longer required to of lock-up-and-leave when away. provide the lifestyle they once had, and Pipeline of new dwellings in prime more often, the cost to upkeep This prime trend follows a similar path to suburbs -Page 7 outweighs the surplus space once the wider market with the average new desired. house size built in 2018/19 falling 1.3% on the year before, whilst the average Owning strata titled property With this new active retiree lifestyle, they new apartment size grew by 3.2%, -Page 8 seek simplicity, and to feel the vibe from according to the Australian Bureau of living close to the action. Downsizing the Statistics (ABS) when commissioned by Case study: The cost to upkeep living areas is not part of this movement CommSec.
    [Show full text]
  • AVANT at Met Square
    january 2016 volume XVIII AVANT at met square the next generation of urban living SUSTAINED MOMENTUM The U.S. economy remains healthy, with more than 2.8 million new jobs added during the 12 months ending October 2015. U.S. homeownership continues to decline, and at 63.7% percent, hovers near historic lows. These positive trends are continuing to drive rental demand. The third quarter of 2015 was the seventh consecutive quarter of positive net unit absorption. On average, rent growth registered 5.2 percent in the major U.S. markets, and the vacancy rate was 4.3 percent, the lowest level of the current cycle. Industry analysts expect that new unit production will peak in 2016, before tapering through the end of the decade. The near term increase in new supply is expected to have only modest impacts on vacancy and rent growth. However, due to continued job growth and a steady influx of new renters, primarily millennials entering the rental market and aging baby boomers who increasingly find rental housing more attractive than homeownership, the market will continue to perform well. With these positive market forces at work, ZOM is poised for continued success in 2016. In Florida, we will complete lease-ups at Moda and Bel Air Doral in early 2016, and will begin delivering units at Monarc at Met 3, Baldwin Harbor, Delray Preserve, and Luzano. In Texas, our Tate project in Houston will also open its doors. In our Mid-Atlantic region, construction continues at Banner Hill in Baltimore, and we are working on several new projects in other Mid-Atlantic target markets.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer-Fall-2018-Slcc-Magazine.Pdf
    SUMMER / FALL 2018 SNAPSHOTS Dancer Brody Rallison shares the stage with Lark & Spur at SLCC’s Grand Theatre. Top: L-R, Music students Aaron Turnblom, Alex Ford and Preston Sorenson show they are “top brass” at South City Campus. SLCC baseball player Fynn Chester makes a fast throw atop the pitcher’s mound. Bottom: Mom is all smiles as Jan Warburton pins her daughter Eryn Warburton at SLCC’s Academic Excellence Celebration. Student Barbara Cavalcanti demonstrates her talent for origami during a presentation in her public speaking class. SUMMER / FALL 2018 | SLCC.EDU 1 CONTENTS SALT LAKE COMMUNITY COLLEGE | SUMMER/FALL 2018 TRAINING TOMORROW’S WORKFORCE 10 The expanded Westpointe Campus FEATURES 08 16 28 37 BREAKING THE CYCLE INVESTING IN STUDENTS COMMENCEMENT GOING FOR GOLD Single moms find careers Kenworth Sales Co. President With pomp and Alumni compete and and hope through Kyle Treadway partners with circumstance, medal in Olympic innovative training. SLCC. thousands graduate. Games in South Korea. 2 SLCC MAGAZINE | SUMMER / FALL 2018 08 16 SLCC Magazine is published biannually by the SLCC Institutional Advancement Division, 801-957-4000. Vice President for Institutional Advancement Alison McFarlane 28 Editor and PR Director Joy Tlou Managing Editor DB Troester Lead Writer and Photographer Stephen Speckman Lead Designer Carol Ross Alumni Relations SECTIONS Laurie Staton 4 SLCC NEWS Editorial Advisers 8 WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT Peggy Hoffman Nancy Michalko 10 CAREER & TECHNICAL EDUCATION Dr. Jason Pickavance 16 GIVING 18 STUDENTS Available online at: 28 COMMENCEMENT slcc.edu/about/slccmagazine.aspx 36 ALUMNI 44 MEET OUR FACULTY 37 46 COLLEGE SPOTLIGHT 48 COMMUNITY SUMMER / FALL 2018 | SLCC.EDU 3 SLCC NEWS DR.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Agriculture Thrives on West Side by Celeste Tholen
    THE WEST VIEW Read about some of west Salt Lake City's vibrant art and culture Escalante's Family Art project Youth Music Programs Tongan Methodist Community PAGE 5 PAGE 6 & 7 PAGE 16 The West View www.westviewmedia.org Community news focused on west Salt Lake City Summer 2018 Urban agriculture thrives on west side By Celeste Tholen ehind a little bungalow on Cheyenne Street you’ll nd a scene that would be- long in rural Utah. Nestled among green Bvegetable plants and fruit trees are chickens, rabbits, beehives, and arched greenhouses. is productive half-acre lot, owned and worked by Celia and Kevin Bell over the past 14 years, is one of several urban homesteads on the west side, clustered in Glendale. e Bells are surrounded by others working the land and eating or selling what they grow or raise. PHOTO BY DAVID RICKETTS SEE URBAN AG PAGE 10 Shad Stagel with Stagel Organics (left) is one of many urban farmers that Hans Ehrbar (right) has supported, including M&M Farms and B.U.G. Farms and a handful of other small, non-commercial farmers located in Glendale. Tibetan Americans in Salt Lake City strive to maintain their culture By Charlotte Fife-Jepperson violent Chinese persecution in Tibet in the early ‘60s. Lobsang’s parents escaped to e rst Tibetan couple came to Utah in India and Tsering’s mother ed to Nepal. the ‘80s. eir long journey led them from Aer the Chinese government slaugh- Tibet to India to Texas and eventually to tered 1.2 million Tibetans and destroyed Salt Lake City, Utah.
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Trustees of the Utah Transit Authority
    Regular Meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Utah Transit Authority Wednesday, July 22, 2020, 9:00 a.m. Remote Electronic Meeting – No Anchor Location – Live-Stream at https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=utaride NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING CIRCUMSTANCES DUE TO COVID-19 PANDEMIC: In keeping with recommendations of Federal, State, and Local authorities to limit public gatherings in order to control the continuing spread of COVID-19, and in accordance with Utah Governor Gary Herbert’s Executive Order on March 18, 2020 suspending some requirements of the Utah Open and Public Meetings Act, the UTA Board of Trustees will make the following adjustments to our normal meeting procedures. • All members of the Board of Trustees and meeting presenters will participate electronically via phone or video conference. • Public Comment will not be taken during the meeting but may be submitted through the means listed below. Comments submitted before 4:00 p.m. on Tuesday, July 21st will be distributed to board members prior to the meeting: o online at https://www.rideuta.com/Board-of-Trustees o via email at [email protected] o by telephone at 801-743-3882 option 5 (801-RideUTA option 5) – specify that your comment is for the board meeting. • Meeting proceedings may be viewed remotely through YouTube live-streaming. https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=utaride 1. Call to Order & Opening Remarks Chair Carlton Christensen 2. Safety First Minute Sheldon Shaw 3. Consent Chair Carlton Christensen a. Approval of July 15, 2020 Board Meeting Minutes 4. Agency Report Carolyn Gonot 5. August 2020 Change Day Service Plan Approval Mary DeLoretto, Laura Hanson 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Parc Huron Becomes Chicago's First LEED Gold High Rise Apartment
    Friday, August 27, 2010 FOR: Parc Huron RMK Management Corp. Parc Huron Becomes Chicago’s First LEED Gold High Rise Apartment Building Luxury rental building first in Illinois, one of only a handful in the country Chicago-based M&R Development and RMK Management Corp. have announced their newest luxury apartment community, Parc Huron, located at 469 W. Huron St. in Chicago’s River North neighborhood, as the first of its kind in the city to earn LEED Gold certification from the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC). To earn this nationally respected accreditation, Parc Huron’s design, construction and operation must meet the strict standards set forth by the USGBC, including a high level of energy and water efficiency; use of recycled and regional materials and recyclable construction materials; and an advanced degree of indoor air quality, which is attained through the use of low-VOC materials and a sophisticated air filtration system. Additional credits were earned for the development of an adjacent park, a green roof, extensive use of natural light throughout the units and the common areas, and for the walkable location in the heart of River North. “We are thrilled to be the first LEED Gold certified rental high rise in Illinois, and are even more excited to offer this type of residence to the people of Chicago,” said Anthony Rossi, Sr., president of RMK Management Corp. “Chicago has long been known as a leader in terms of art, fashion and architecture, and we continue to be ahead of the trend for high-end green living, too.” Rossi noted that the apartment homes, in addition to being exceptionally eco-friendly, offer upscale features on par with for-sale condominiums.
    [Show full text]
  • Residential Hotels in Chicago, 1880-1930
    NPS Form 10-900-b OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is used for documenting property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (formerly 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. __x_____ New Submission ________ Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Residential Hotels in Chicago, 1880-1930 B. Associated Historic Contexts (Name each associated historic context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period for each.) The Evolution of the Residential Hotel in Chicago as a Distinct Building Type (1880-1930) C. Form Prepared by: name/title: Emily Ramsey, Lara Ramsey, w/Terry Tatum organization: Ramsey Historic Consultants street & number: 1105 W. Chicago Avenue, Suite 201 city or town: Chicago state: IL zip code: 60642 e-mail: [email protected] telephone: 312-421-1295 date: 11/28/2016 D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR 60 and the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation. _______________________________ _______________________________________________ Signature of certifying official Title Date _____________________________________ State or Federal Agency or Tribal government I hereby certify that this multiple property documentation form has been approved by the National Register as a basis for evaluating related properties for listing in the National Register.
    [Show full text]
  • Cleveland Heights RFQ
    Request for Qualifications and Preliminary Development Proposals RFQ/RFP – Top of Hill Site Presented to: City of Cleveland Heights 40 Severance Circle Cleveland Heights, OH 44118 For More Information Contact: Deron Kintner General Counsel Flaherty & Collins Properties [email protected] 317.816.9300 www.flco.com May 23, 2016 Flaherty & Collins Properties (F&C) is pleased to submit this Request for Qualifications and Development Proposal to the City of Cleveland Heights for the development of the Top of the Hill site. As Developer, F&C will develop the Project in the same manner as the projects outlined in this proposal. For the reasons stated in this submission, F&C believes its extensive experience and proven track record make us the best and most uniquely qualified developer to undertake this complex and exciting development. If selected, F&C commits to deliver a first-class, high-quality, innovative mixed-use development in a timely and efficient manner. We believe we are the best and most qualified developer to execute and deliver upon this development. The materials to follow provide more detail to support each of these points. • Corporate Experience. F&C, which has over 450 employees, has developed 58 projects and more than 8,500 units in the past 15 years with a value in excess of $1 billion, currently manages over 15,500 units in 13 states and has been involved with the construction of over 15,000 units in 20 states. F&C is fully integrated with in-house development, construction and property management professionals and has the ability to structure, procure and close complicated, multi-layered financing.
    [Show full text]
  • Luxury Wood-Frame Apartment Community Completes Dense, Mixed-Use Urban Development Flagship Project in the Heart of Atlanta Connects Developer with Goals
    FRONT COVER CASE STUDY CRESCENT TERMINUS Luxury Wood-Frame Apartment Community Completes Dense, Mixed-Use Urban Development Flagship project in the heart of Atlanta connects developer with goals $FRA-490_CrescentTerminus_CaseStudy.indd 3 3/13/15 4:18 PM Surrounded by high-rise buildings in the upscale Buckhead neighborhood of Atlanta, Crescent Terminus is a new three-building, luxury apartment complex offering resort-style amenities, including a salt-water pool, rooftop terraces with dramatic skyline views, a gourmet coffee bar and more. Featuring five stories of wood over a concrete podium, the project fills the last three parcels of land in the Terminus complex, completing this unique urban development. And while the prime piece of real estate carried a corresponding price tag, the developer was able to move ahead with the project thanks in large part to the choice of an affordable, high-quality wood-frame structure. 2 $FRA-490_CrescentTerminus_CaseStudy.indd 2 3/13/15 4:18 PM CRESCENT TERMINUS “This site has all the ingredients for a successful luxury apartment community,” said Jay Curran, Vice President of Crescent Project Overview Communities’ multi-family group. “Its location in the heart of Buckhead is ideal. Surrounded by world-class office space, luxury condominiums, outstanding public art, five-star dining and street- level retail, Crescent Terminus will offer a unique lifestyle that allows residents an opportunity to work, play and live all within easy walking distances. This location and all those attributes are consistent with the Crescent brand of exceptional development.” The Crescent Terminus project was inspired through extensive review and analysis of current industry trends and marketplace needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Health Needs Assessment Implementation Plan & Completion
    20 20 18 20 University of Utah Health University Neuropsychiatric Institute COMMUNITY HEALTH NEEDS ASSESSMENT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN & COMPLETION REPORT Table of Contents 2018-2020 COMMUNITY HEALTH NEEDS ASSESSMENT PROCESS 3 1 Our Approach 4 Data Indicators, Review of Other Health Assessments, Prioritization 5 PRIORITY - IMPROVING MENTAL HEALTH & REDUCING SUICIDE 6 2 Implementation Strategies 13 3 APPENDIX 21 Prior to July 1, 2019 the University of Utah Hospitals and Clinics (UUHC) and the University of Utah Neuropsychiatric Institute (UNI) were separately licensed and certified facilities. Effective July 1, 2019 both UUHC and UNI were both licensed and certified as the same facility. As a result of these facilities being licensed under the same entity and facility ID number this Community Health Needs Assessment Completion Report will be the last standalone report issued for UNI. The future goals for UNI are encompassed within the 2021-2023 UUHC CHNA report. 2 OUR APPROACH 2018-2020 Community Health Needs Assessment Process The focus of the 2018-2020 Community Health Needs Assessment (CHNA) was primarily on Salt Lake County (SLC); however, some of the implications and strategies address a broader region, including the many rural areas in Utah beyond SLC. The CHNA process was led by University of Utah Health leadership and staff, and was done in conjunction with Utah Public Health Partners (UHIP). UHIP created the Utah Statewide Health Improvement Plan (SHIP) and works collaboratively with numerous health care providers and all 13 local area Health Departments to produce the Statewide Health Assessment 2016 (SWA). Several employees of the University of Utah served on the Utah Health Improvement Plan Coalition that produced the SHIP and the SWA, including Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Raw Data from Parley's Way Survey | Spring 2020
    Default Report Transportation - Parleys Way (2300 E to I-80) April 7, 2020 5:13 PM MDT Q21 - What is your connection to this street? (Parleys Way 2300 E to I-80) Check all that apply. I live on this street I have a business on this street I commute on this street I don't use this street I work on this street I use this street occasionally I park on this street 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Choice # Field Count 1 I live on this street 12.50% 11 2 I have a business on this street 4.55% 4 3 I commute on this street 37.50% 33 4 I don't use this street 1.14% 1 5 I work on this street 17.05% 15 6 I use this street occasionally 27.27% 24 7 I park on this street 0.00% 0 88 Showing rows 1 - 8 of 8 Q1 - How do you travel on this street? Daily Weekly Walk Bike Scooter/Skateboard Wheelchair/Walker Drive Transit (Bus/TRAX) Rideshare/Taxi Other Occasionally Rarely or Never 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 # Field Minimum Maximum Mean Std Deviation Variance Count 1 Walk 1.00 4.00 2.54 0.98 0.97 61 2 Bike 1.00 4.00 2.75 0.95 0.90 53 # Field Minimum Maximum Mean Std Deviation Variance Count 3 Scooter/Skateboard 2.00 4.00 3.89 0.38 0.15 38 4 Wheelchair/Walker 2.00 4.00 3.95 0.32 0.10 39 5 Drive 1.00 4.00 1.59 0.84 0.71 68 6 Transit (Bus/TRAX) 2.00 4.00 3.77 0.48 0.23 39 7 Rideshare/Taxi 2.00 4.00 3.72 0.50 0.25 43 8 Other 2.00 4.00 3.79 0.56 0.31 14 # Field Daily Weekly Occasionally Rarely or Never Total 1 Walk 16.39% 10 32.79% 20 31.15% 19 19.67% 12 61 2 Bike 13.21% 7 20.75% 11 43.40% 23 22.64% 12 53 3 Scooter/Skateboard 0.00% 0 2.63% 1 5.26% 2 92.11% 35 38 4 Wheelchair/Walker
    [Show full text]