DOCSLIB.ORG

The Jerusalem Post Knesset Passes Bill Requiring NGO Transparency

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Jerusalem Post Knesset Passes Bill Requiring NGO Transparency The Jerusalem Post Knesset passes bill requiring NGO transparency By GIL HOFFMAN AND REBECCA ANNA STOIL 02/21/2011 MK Rotem withdraws more draconian measures before vote; PM blocks NGO inquiry; Lieberman associates say PM caved to left, vow revenge. The Knesset passed a bill into law on Monday requiring nongovernmental organizations to issue quarterly reports about funding they receive from foreign governments, and to reveal when they are backed by other countries in their websites and advertisements. The bill, which was sponsored by coalition chairman Ze’ev Elkin (Likud), passed its final reading by a 40-34 vote after tougher measures against NGOs and plans to form parliamentary inquiry committees to examine them were dropped. Knesset Law Committee chairman David Rotem, one of the bill’s co-sponsors, withdrew amendments that would have taken tax benefits away from NGOs supported by foreign governments. His amendments would also have required NGOs to report donations from foreign individuals and to write that they received foreign funding on every e-mail they sent. Under the version approved on Monday, NGOs could be heavily fined for violating the new guidelines. Following the bill’s approval in committee earlier this month, the Association for Civil Rights in Israel said the legislation was “clearly selective and politically motivated.” “If the bill was truly out to increase transparency, it would include not only donations from foreign state entities, but also from foreign private donors, which are frequent funders of the activities of extremist organizations and groups in Israel,” the NGO said. It noted that Rotem had agreed to apply the measures to all foreign donations, but had later dropped that amendment. Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu expressed support for Rotem’s amendments at Monday’s Likud faction meeting, in the face of strong opposition to the bill expressed by the leadership of several countries. But Rotem said he had decided to drop the amendments at the request of Zionist organizations that had told him the amendments would harm them. Rotem said he would submit a different version of his amendments before the end of the Knesset’s winter session next month. He expressed confidence that he would be able to pass them. Netanyahu also took steps on Monday to kill efforts to form a Knesset inquiry committee that would have examined donations from foreign countries to Israeli NGOs. The prime minister decided to accept a request by Education Minister Gideon Sa’ar to allow Likud MKs to vote their conscience on the bill rather than enforce party discipline. That decision ensured that there would not be a majority to approve forming the parliamentary inquiry committee. Netanyahu initially announced that he supported forming the committee, but he took steps to stop it from being created already last month, when he tried unsuccessfully to block faction discipline from being imposed on the measure. “A parliamentary investigative committee would lack the power to enact change, and at the same time would further worsen the delegitimization of Israel worldwide,” the prime minister told the Likud faction Monday. Kadima was quick to respond to Netanyahu’s decision. “This is a welcome concession by an outgoing prime minister,” said Kadima MK Yoel Hasson. “Netanyahu once again proved that his consideration works only after the appropriate level of pressure is put on him. It is too bad that he needed the attorney-general, the Knesset legal adviser and Kadima in order to reach the right decision.” However, Netanyahu’s decision to block the inquiry committee reportedly angered Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, who is in Brussels for a meeting of the Israel- European Union Association Council with the 27 EU foreign ministers on Tuesday. Lieberman heard about Netanyahu’s decision from the press. His associates condemned the prime minister for “caving in to the Left,” and vowed revenge. The EU foreign ministers and Lieberman are expected to face off at the meeting on the funding their countries give anti-Zionist organizations in Israel. Meanwhile, a Panels poll broadcast Monday on the Knesset Channel found that most Israelis consider Lieberman a good politician and a bad foreign minister. Fiftyseven percent of respondents called him a good politician, and 10% said he was a bad one. Only 28% said he was good foreign minister..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Israel and Overseas: Israeli Election Primer 2015 (As Of, January 27, 2015) Elections • in Israel, Elections for the Knesset A
    Israel and Overseas: Israeli Election Primer 2015 (As of, January 27, 2015) Elections In Israel, elections for the Knesset are held at least every four years. As is frequently the case, the outgoing government coalition collapsed due to disagreements between the parties. As a result, the Knesset fell significantly short of seeing out its full four year term. Knesset elections in Israel will now be held on March 17, 2015, slightly over two years since the last time that this occurred. The Basics of the Israeli Electoral System All Israeli citizens above the age of 18 and currently in the country are eligible to vote. Voters simply select one political party. Votes are tallied and each party is then basically awarded the same percentage of Knesset seats as the percentage of votes that it received. So a party that wins 10% of total votes, receives 10% of the seats in the Knesset (In other words, they would win 12, out of a total of 120 seats). To discourage small parties, the law was recently amended and now the votes of any party that does not win at least 3.25% of the total (probably around 130,000 votes) are completely discarded and that party will not receive any seats. (Until recently, the “electoral threshold,” as it is known, was only 2%). For the upcoming elections, by January 29, each party must submit a numbered list of its candidates, which cannot later be altered. So a party that receives 10 seats will send to the Knesset the top 10 people listed on its pre-submitted list.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel Report
    To provide greater exposure to primary Israeli news sources and opinions in order to become better informed on the issues, and to gain a better understanding of the wide range of perspectives that exist in Israeli society and politics. Issue 1005 • May 6, 2016 • 28 Nisan 5776 7 DECADES AFTER HOLOCAUST, ISRAEL'S JEWS EXCEED 6,000,000 opposed, and solidify his reputation as a president that was strong on Israeli (Israel Hayom 5/4/16) security despite a rocky relationship with Netanyahu. Seventy-one years after the end of World War II and the Holocaust, Israel's Netanyahu may expect that Hillary Clinton, the likely Democratic nominee for population stands at roughly 8,502,900, including some 6,374,400 Jews, the president, would be more intent to cement her pro-Israel credentials should Central Bureau of Statistics said in a new report published on Sunday. she be elected. But should presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump The figures do not include foreign workers, who numbered just over 190,000 succeed Obama, Netanyahu may run into difficulties. in 2014. Trump recently outlined his foreign policy approach as "America First," which The figures also show that Israel's general population growth rate is 13,500 would seem to favor clauses that boost American jobs over Israeli ones. In per month, which includes a Jewish population growth rate of about 10,000 March, Trump speculated that foreign aid recipients of all stripes, including per month. Israel, should be forced to pay the US back for aid. Jews make up some 74.8% of the population, according to the figures.
    [Show full text]
  • Répondre Au Mépris Du Droit
    Palestine 59 Solidarité janvier 2017 | 3 € Dans ce numéro Répondre au mépris du droit La réponse des dirigeants israéliens à l’exi- Les dirigeants israéliens qui avaient ces der- 2 Recherche et gence de la communauté internationale de niers temps essayé avec des moyens colossaux développement : mettre fin à la colonisation et d’œuvrer pour une d’embellir leur image, ont semble-t-il, totalement le militaire en solution sous égide internationale a été du même abandonné ces tentatives de séduction au profit embuscade ordre que la politique menée à l’encontre des d’une confrontation directe avec l’ensemble de 4 Palestine : l’avenir se Palestiniens : arrogance, mépris du droit et néga- la communauté internationale. Ils envisagent joue aussi à Bruxelles L tion des droits nationaux du peuple palestinien. maintenant l’annexion pure et simple de la 4 Encadré Horizon L’initiative de Paris ? « Un procès Dreyfus Cisjordanie. Leurs atouts principaux sont l’adhé- 2020 moderne ». La résolution de l’UNESCO sur la sion d’une écrasante majorité d’Israéliens à leur 7 Étiquetage des produits des judaïsation forcée de Jérusalem ? Un acte anti- politique et l’élection de Donald Trump qui leur a colonies : sémite niant toutes relations entre Jérusalem, les promis monts et merveilles après le 20 janvier un pas en avant vers juifs et le judaïsme, alors même qu’elle rappelait 2017. l’arrêt de l’importation le lien entre la vieille ville et les trois religions Cent ans après la déclaration Balfour, soixante- 9-10 Fiche formation monothéistes. dix ans après le crime commis avec prémédita- 11 Israël dans un La résolution 2334 est vue comme le résultat tion en se basant sur cette déclaration, cinquante processus de fascisation d’un complot international visant Israël et les ans après l’occupation israélienne de juin 1967, 13 2017, année de tous juifs.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 207, October 2015 Issue
    Applied Research Institute - Jerusalem (ARIJ) P.O Box 860, Caritas Street – Bethlehem, Phone: (+972) 2 2741889, Fax: (+972) 2 2776966. [email protected] | http://www.arij.org Applied Research Institute – Jerusalem Report on the Israeli Colonization Activities in the West Bank & the Gaza Strip Volume 207, October 2015 Issue http://www.arij.org Bethlehem Israeli settlers escorted by the Israeli Occupation Army (IOA) closed the main road in Tuqu village, southeast of Bethlehem city. (Wafa 1 October 2015) Israeli settlers escorted by the Israeli Occupation Army (IOA) raided and toured in Solomon pool area in Artas village, southwest of Bethlehem city and performed Talmudic rituals. (NBPRS 1 October 2015) Clashes erupted between Palestinians and the Israeli Occupation Army (IOA) near Rachel tomb and around Ayda refugee camp, north of Bethlehem city. The IOA fired teargas and stun grenades and rubber bullets at Palestinians and houses, causing dozens of suffocation cases. (Al-Quds 2 October 2015) Israeli settlers opened fire at Waleed Qouqar (35 years) from Ayda refugee camp, north of Bethlehem city, while he was at the Israeli Bypass road No.60. Mr. Qouqar was injured. (Al-Quds 2 October 2015) Clashes erupted between Palestinians and the Israeli Occupation Army (IOA) near Al Azza refugee camp in Bethlehem city. The IOA fired rubber bullets, teargas and stun grenades at Palestinians. (PNN 4 October 2015) Dozens of Palestinians suffered gas inhalation during clashes that erupted between Palestinians and the Israeli Occupation Army (IOA) around Bilal Ben Rabah mosque, at the northern entrance of Bethlehem city. The IOA fired teargas and stun grenade at Palestinians.
    [Show full text]
  • Israeli Culture 2019 - Topic Menu
    Israeli Culture 2019 - Topic Menu 1. Nation-State Law Explainer What is the Nation-State Bill? The Nation-State Bill is a Basic Law that, for the first time, anchors in law Israel’s status as the “national home of the Jewish people.” Among its 11 clauses, the bill defines such things as state symbols like the flag and national anthem, the official language, national holidays, the Sabbath, the capital Jerusalem, relations with the Diaspora, and of Jewish settlement. So what’s the problem? #1 - No mention of democracy or equality Opponents of the bill note that there is no mention anywhere in the bill—nor in any other Basic Law, for that matter— of the term “equality.” Because of the need to guarantee minority rights, almost all nation-states in the world include an explicit commitment to the value of equality in their constitution or other core legislation. Israel’s Declaration of Independence contains an explicit guarantee of this sort. Moreover, the bill omits any mention of Israel's democratic character, thereby calling into question the existing "Jewish and democratic" formula that appears in previous Basic Laws. Opponents of the bill argue that this deficiency may lead to privileging Israel’s Jewish character over its democratic one, with a broad set of ramifications on everything from education policy to religion and state. Proponents, on the other hand, contend that the existing Basic Law: Human Dignity and Liberty defines Israel’s democratic character. Therefore, the present bill was necessary to anchor Israel’s Jewish character in constitutional law. So what’s the problem? #2 – Majority-Minority Relations The Nation-State Bill contains two clauses that affect the standing of Israel’s non-Jewish minority groups, especially Arab-Israelis who make up 20 percent of the population.
    [Show full text]
  • J Street Program
    Program2015Final4.indd 1 3/17/15 8:19 AM J STREET BOARD OF DIRECTORS J Street is the political home for pro-Israel, pro-peace Americans fighting for the future of Israel as the democratic homeland of the Jewish people. We believe that Israel’s Jewish and democratic character depends on a two-state solution, resulting in a Palestinian state living alongside Israel in peace and security. J Street Education Fund, Inc. is a 501(c)(3) charitable organization. It aims to educate targeted communities about the need for a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, to raise the visibility of a SUNDAY, MARCH 22 • 8:30–10 AM SUNDAY, mainstream pro-Israel, pro-peace presence within the American Jewish community, as well as to promote open, dynamic and spirited conversation about how to best advance the interests and future of a democratic, Jewish Israel. Members of the Tikva Society invest in J Street’s growth through multi-year increasing contributions. As of March 16, 2015 2 • A CLEAR CHOICE FOR A BETTER FUTURE #JSt2015 • jstreet.org Program2015Final4.indd 2 3/17/15 8:19 AM J STREET BOARD OF DIRECTORS Morton H. Halperin, Chair Daniel Kohl Alexandra C. Stanton, Vice-Chair (Co-Chair, JStreetPAC) Victor A. Kovner (Co-Chair, JStreetPAC) Kenneth Bob, Treasurer Charles Kremer Jeremy Ben-Ami Yaffa Maritz Nancy Bernstein William S. Singer Debra DeLee Ambassador Alan Solomont Howard Dickstein Robert Stein Molly Freeman Judith Zee Steinberg Davidi Gilo Ambassador Louis B. Susman Richard Goldwasser Sidney Topol Joanna Goodwin Friedman Carol Winograd Sylvia Kaplan TIKVA SOCIETY Richard A.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel: Background and U.S. Relations
    Israel: Background and U.S. Relations Jim Zanotti Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs June 12, 2013 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL33476 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Israel: Background and U.S. Relations Summary Since Israel’s founding in 1948, successive U.S. Presidents and many Members of Congress have demonstrated a commitment to Israel’s security and to maintaining close U.S.-Israel defense, diplomatic, and economic cooperation. U.S. and Israeli leaders have developed close relations based on common perceptions of shared democratic values and religious affinities. U.S. policymakers often seek to determine how regional events and U.S. policy choices may affect Israel’s security, and Congress provides active oversight of executive branch dealings with Israel and the broader Middle East. Some Members of Congress and some analysts criticize what they perceive as U.S. support for Israel without sufficient scrutiny of its actions. Israel is a leading recipient of U.S. foreign aid and is a frequent purchaser of major U.S. weapons systems. The United States and Israel maintain close security cooperation—predicated on a U.S. commitment to maintain Israel’s “qualitative military edge” over other countries in its region. The two countries signed a free trade agreement in 1985, and the United States is Israel’s largest trading partner. For more information, see CRS Report RL33222, U.S. Foreign Aid to Israel, by Jeremy M. Sharp. Israel has many regional security concerns. Israeli leaders calling for urgent international action against Iran’s nuclear program hint at the possibility of a unilateral military strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Visiting Delegations—20Th Knesset
    The Knesset Visiting Delegations—20th Knesset Since April 2015, the 20th Knesset has welcomed some 350 visiting delegations from abroad. Below are some highlights of this work, which point to the variety of national and professional backgrounds represented in these delegations. Visit of the Secretary General of the Parliament of Georgia Participants: Dates: 11–12 December 2018 Details: In December 2018, the Secretary General of the Parliament of Georgia visited the Knesset. He was accompanied by a delegation that included the Deputy Secretary General, the Secretary General of the Supreme Council of the Autonomous Republic of Adjara, and the Knesset’s contact person in the Parliament of Georgia. During the visit, the delegation was shown various aspects of the Knesset's administrative work: human resources, transparency, information and technology, accessibility, and more. A meeting with the Board of Oversight and Review of Specially Designated Secrets of the Japanese House of Representatives (the Diet) Participants: MK Avi Dichter, chairman of the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, and Mr. Shmuel Letko, the director of the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, and MK Tzipi Livni Dates: 30 July 2018 Details: On July 29 and 30, the Knesset hosted a delegation of the Board of Oversight and Review of Specially Designated Secrets of the Japanese House of Representatives. The delegation came to Israel to learn about the management of confidential information, the regulation of information classification, and the relationship between the executive branch and the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee and its subcommittees. As part of the visit, the delegation members met with Opposition Leader MK Livni, chairman of the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee MK Dichter, and with committee director Shmuel Letko, with whom they discussed the committee's work and information management procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • United Against Torture (UAT) Coalition Supplementary Report For
    United Against Torture (UAT) Coalition Supplementary Report For Consideration Regarding Israel’s Fourth Periodic Report to the UN Committee Against Torture (CAT) Submitted April 2009 Contact: Rifat Kassis General Director Defence for Children International - Palestine Section Email: [email protected]; Tel: 972-(0)2-242-7530 ext. 102 The United Against Torture Coalition (the UAT Coalition) members participating in this report consist of 14 Palestinian and Israeli human rights NGOs1 dedicated to the progressive and substantial eradication of torture and ill-treatment in Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT). The UAT Coalition aims to achieve this goal through coordinated documentation, reporting and exposure of incidence of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment in Israel and the OPT with the aim of holding duty bearers to account. 1 Adalah – The Legal Center for Arab Minority Rights in Israel; Al-Haq – Law in the Service of Man; Al-Mezan Center for Human Rights; Al-Quds University Human Rights Clinic; An Najah University Centre for Democracy and Human Rights; Defence for Children International – Palestine Section (DCI/PS); Gaza Community Mental Health Program (GCMHP); Hurriyat – Centre for Defence of Liberties and Civil Rights; Italian Consortium of Solidarity (ICS); Nadi Al-Asir (Palestinian Prisoners Club); Nafha Society for Defence of Prisoners and Human Rights; Mandela Institute for Human Rights and Political Prisoners; Public Committee Against Torture in Israel (PCATI); and Treatment and
    [Show full text]
  • In This Issue: Universal Support for Future of Har Hazeitim
    International Committee for Har Hazeitim INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR UPDATEWinter 2018 The International Historic Cemetery of the Jewish People THE HISTORIC MISSION In This Issue: Universal Support for Future of Har Hazeitim........................................................................................................................................... pg 1 Israel’s Chief Rabbis Yosef and Lau......................................................................................................................................................................... pg 2-3 Waldorf Dinner Launches Mission.......................................................................................................................................................................... pg 2-3 High Level Tour of Har Hazeitim.............................................................................................................................................................................. pg 4-5 Luncheon Reception at the Wall with Rabbi and Deputy Mayor......................................................................................... pg 5 The Key Moment: Inauguration of the Knesset Caucus............................................................................................................... pg 5-6 Prime Minister Netanyahu: “Har Hazeitim is THE Mountain!”.............................................................................................. pg 7 President Rivlin: Personal with Har Hazeitim...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Outgoing Delegations—20Th Knesset
    The Knesset Outgoing Delegations—20th Knesset Participation by the Director General of the Knesset in Events Marking 100 years of Democracy in Georgia Participants: Director General of the Knesset Albert Sakharovich Destination: Georgia Dates: 10–14 March 2019 Details: The Director General of the Knesset, Albert Sakharovich, was invited by his Georgian counterpart, Mr. Givi Mikandadze, to take part in a series of events marking the 100th anniversary of democracy in Georgia. During the visit, work meetings were held in Parliament, including a tour of the training center and a visit to an information and reception area for people with disabilities. In addition, a tour was held of the National Parliamentary Library of Georgia, which is housed in the parliament, and the Book Museum. Conference of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Mediterranean (PAM) in Belgrade Participants: MK Amir Peretz (Labor), MK Eitan Broshi (Labor) Destination: Belgrade, Serbia Dates: 20–24 February 2019 Details: MK Amir Peretz, the Knesset representative in the PAM, was elected by secret ballot as vice president of the organization with a large majority of 80% of the vote and was given the second slot after Italy. MK Peretz: "This is an important moment in strengthening the international standing of the Knesset in the international arena. It provides an opportunity to advance economic and political issues in a complex arena that includes representatives of the Mediterranean basin and representatives of Arab countries in our region." MK Peretz called on the organization to serve as an umbrella for bilateral talks, including between Israelis and Palestinians. Conference of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) Participants: MK Anat Berko (Likud) Destination: Vienna, Austria Dates: 20–23 February 2019 Details: The OSCE's Winter Meeting was held in February 2019 inVienna.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Mitchell on J Street Conference
    Thomas Mitchell on J Street conference It’s interesting to see this perspective by Dr. Thomas Mitchell on his “Self- Hating Gentile” blog. I haven’t yet had the chance to do my own reflections on the conference, but I’d disagree with Tom’s point about the US needing to lay back right now. Most of the J Street audience was disappointed by Dennis Ross (although not surprised), as they desire a more assertive White House role in brokering a peace agreement–as do I. The predominant sense of the conference is that it’s urgent to effectively pressure the parties toward an agreement on establishing two states because the status quo is unsustainable. Ross even said this about the status quo, but he gave us no hint of anything happening to back up this statement. Still, Tom’s thoughts are at least a good jumping off point for looking at the conference: … Having attended an AIPAC conference in 1995 during the Oslo conference and the J Street conference in 2009, what struck me about the former was that it was mostly intended to fire up the troops and allow politicians to compete in kissing up to the Israeli lobby. J Street instead of just conducting workshops on messaging and the upcoming election cycle in the U.S., attempted to educate its supporters about the conflict by inviting members of the Palestinian government and the Israeli Knesset to the conference to serve on panels. Nachman Shai, a former academic expert on the Israeli nuclear deterrent and now an MK for Kadima, was very open.
    [Show full text]