The Nation State Law: Who Voted for It

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

The Nation State Law: Who Voted For It Voted For Voted Against Abstained Absent Voted For Likud Ofir Akunis David Amsalem Anat Berko David Bitan Nava Boker Avi Dichter Yuli-Yoel Edelstein Zeev Elkin Gilad Erdan Gila Gamliel Yehuda Joshua Glick Tzachi Hanegbi Sharren Haskel Oren Asaf Hazan Ayoob Kara Haim Katz Yisrael Katz Yoav Kisch Nurit Koren Yariv Levin Jackie Levy Yaron Mazuz Avraham Neguise Benjamin Netanyahu Amir Ohana Miri Regev Yuval Steinitz Miki Zohar Kulanu Rachel Azaria Merav Ben Ari Eli Cohen Elie Elalouf Roy Folkman Yoav Gallant Michael Oren Tali Ploskov Yifat Shasha-Biton Jewish Home Uri Yehuda Ariel Eli Ben Dahan Naftali Bennett Shuli Moalem-Refaeli Ayelet Shaked Nissan Slomiansky Bezalel Smotrich Mordhay Yogev Shas Yinon Azoulay Yoav Ben Tzur Michael Malchieli Yakov Margi Meshulam Nahari Dan Saida Yitzhak Vaknin United Torah Judaism Yakov Asher Israel Eichler Moshe Gafni Yakov Litzman Uri Maklev Menachem Eliezer Moses Yisrael Beitenu Oded Forer Robert Ilatov Sofa Landver Yulia Malinovsky Voted Against Zionist Union Yael Cohen Paran Leah Fadida Zouheir Bahloul Ayelet Nahmias-Verbin Saleh Saad Eyal Ben Reuven Tzipi Livni Amir Peretz Stav Shaffir Ksenia Svetlova Revital Swid Itzik Shmuli Micky Rosenthal Michal Biran Nachman Shai Yoel Hasson Shelly Yachimovich Isaac Herzog Eitan Cabel Merav Michaeli Eytan Broshi Yehiel Hilik Bar Omer Barlev Joint List Talab Abu Arar Jouma Azbarga Dov Khenin Jamal Zahalka Hanin Zoabi Saeed Alkharumi Masud Ganaim Abd Al Hakeem Haj Yahya Ahmad Tibi Yousef Jabareen Wael Younis (since resigned) Ayman Odeh Aida Touma-Sliman Yesh Atid Yael German Elazar Stern Ofer Shelah Yair Lapid Penina Tamamu-Shata Mickey Levy Meir Cohen Haim Jelin Yoel Razvozov Aliza Lavie Karin Elharar Meretz Ilan Gilon Michal Rozin Esawi Frej Tamar Zandberg Mossi Raz Yisrael Beitenu Hamad Amar Kulanu Akram Hasoon Abstained Benny Begin (Likud) Orly Levi-Abekasis (Independent) Absent Tzipi Hotovely (Likud) Yossi Yonah (Zionist Union).

Copy Link

Recommended publications

1 Schlaglicht Israel Nr. 17/20 Aktuelles Aus Israelischen Tageszeitungen 1
Schlaglicht Israel Nr. 17/20 Aktuelles aus israelischen Tageszeitungen 1.-15. Oktober Die Themen dieser Ausgabe 1. Gespräche zwischen Israel und Libanon ...................................................................................................................... 1 2. Demonstrationen gegen Netanyahu trotz Lockdown ................................................................................................... 3 3. Ultraorthodoxe im Abseits .............................................................................................................................................. 4 4. Medienquerschnitt ........................................................................................................................................................... 6 1. Gespräche zwischen Israel und Libanon Peace with Lebanon? Not so fast Seit Jahrzehnten zum ersten Mal treffen sich Vertre- Lebanon has never been a strong nation. (…) Saudi ter_innen aus Israel und dem Libanon zu Gesprä- Arabia (…) is now keeping its distance. Other Arab chen über ihre Meeresgrenze. Schauplatz ist der and Western nations have also turned their back on UN-Stützpunkt in Nakura im Südlibanon. Besonders Lebanon (…) French President Emmanuel Macron, umstritten ist ein Keil von 860 Quadratkilometern vor who felt obligated to come to Lebanon's aid, came der Küste beider Länder. Dort werden Gasfelder ver- back empty-handed when his plan to form a techno- mutet. Von der schweren Finanzkrise getroffen er- cratic government failed due to sectarian bickering. teilte
[Show full text]
Israel's National Religious and the Israeli- Palestinian Conflict
Leap of Faith: Israel’s National Religious and the Israeli- Palestinian Conflict Middle East Report N°147 | 21 November 2013 International Crisis Group Headquarters Avenue Louise 149 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i Recommendations..................................................................................................................... iv I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. Religious Zionism: From Ascendance to Fragmentation ................................................ 5 A. 1973: A Turning Point ................................................................................................ 5 B. 1980s and 1990s: Polarisation ................................................................................... 7 C. The Gaza Disengagement and its Aftermath ............................................................. 11 III. Settling the Land .............................................................................................................. 14 A. Bargaining with the State: The Kookists ................................................................... 15 B. Defying the State: The Hilltop Youth ........................................................................ 17 IV. From the Hills to the State ..............................................................................................
[Show full text]
Israel and the Middle East News Update
Israel and the Middle East News Update Friday, December 13 Headlines: • Israel Hayom Poll: Center-Left Bloc – 61, Right Wing Bloc - 51, Liberman - 8 • Liberman Backs Pardon for Netanyahu in Exchange for Exit from Politics • Poll: Israelis Prefer a Two State Solution to One State • UK Chief Rabbi: Election Is Over But Worries Over anti-Semitism Remain Commentary: • Ma’ariv: “Netanyahu’s Life’s Work” − By Ben Caspit • TOI: “Why Israel’s 3rd Election Might Not Be Such a Disaster, After All” − By David Horovitz, editor of the Times of Israel S. Daniel Abraham Center for Middle East Peace 633 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20004 The Hon. Robert Wexler, President ● Yoni Komorov, Editor ● Yehuda Greenfield-Gilat, Associate Editor News Excerpts December 13, 2019 Israel Hayom Poll: Center-Left Bloc – 61, Right Wing Bloc - 51, Liberman - 8 Q: If the Knesset election were held today and Binyamin Netanyahu were Likud chairman, for which party would you vote? Blue and White: 37 Likud: 31 Joint List: 14 Shas: 8 Yisrael Beiteinu: 8 United Torah Judaism: 7 Labor Party-Gesher: 6 New Right: 5 Democratic Union: 4 Q: Who do you think is primarily responsible for the failure to form a government? Binyamin Netanyahu: 43% Avigdor Liberman: 30% Yair Lapid: 6% Benny Gantz: 5% The Haredim: 2% Q: Will the fact that Israel is holding elections for the third time in the span of a year make you change or not change your vote compared with the previous elections? Yes: 13% No: 60% Perhaps: 27% Q: What are the odds that you will vote in the upcoming Knesset election, which will take place in approximately three months? Certain: 59% Good odds: 23% Moderate odds: 3% Poor odds: 15% See also, “Poll shows Gantz’s Blue and White opening 6-seat lead over Netanyahu’s Likud” (Times of Israel) Times of Israel Liberman Backs Pardon for Netanyahu in Exchange for Exit Yisrael Beytenu party leader Avigdor Liberman said Thursday he would back a deal in which Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is allowed to avoid jail in exchange for an agreement to retire from politics.
[Show full text]
Israel: Background and U.S
Israel: Background and U.S. Relations in Brief Updated September 20, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R44245 SUMMARY R44245 Israel: Background and U.S. Relations in Brief September 20, 2019 The following matters are of particular significance to U.S.-Israel relations: Jim Zanotti Israel’s ability to address threats. Israel relies on a number of strengths—including Specialist in Middle regional conventional military superiority—to manage potential threats to its security, Eastern Affairs including evolving asymmetric threats such as rockets and missiles, cross-border tunneling, drones, and cyberattacks. Additionally, Israel has an undeclared but presumed nuclear weapons capability. Against a backdrop of strong bilateral cooperation, Israel’s leaders and supporters routinely make the case that Israel’s security and the broader stability of the region remain critically important for U.S. interests. A 10-year bilateral military aid memorandum of understanding (MOU)— signed in 2016—commits the United States to provide Israel $3.3 billion in Foreign Military Financing annually from FY2019 to FY2028, along with additional amounts from Defense Department accounts for missile defense. All of these amounts remain subject to congressional appropriations. Some Members of Congress criticize various Israeli actions and U.S. policies regarding Israel. In recent months, U.S. officials have expressed some security- related concerns about China-Israel commercial activity. Iran and the region. Israeli officials seek to counter Iranian regional influence and prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. In April 2018, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu presented historical information about Iran’s nuclear program that Israeli intelligence apparently seized from an Iranian archive.
[Show full text]
2016 Annual Report
Research. Debate. Impact. 2016 ANNUAL REPORT 1 Table of Contents Message from the President and the Chairman of the Board 4 Sixth Meeting of IDI's International Advisory Council 8 The Center for Democratic Values and Institutions 11 The Center for Religion, Nation and State 23 The Center for Governance and the Economy 29 The Center for Security and Democracy 35 The Guttman Center for Surveys and Public Policy Research 41 IDI in the Media 47 Our Team 50 Our Leaders 51 Our Partners 52 Financials 53 Message from the President and the Chairman of the Board Dear Friends, 2016 was a year of change and upheaval throughout the jobs available to Haredim. The government adopted most of democratic world. Set against the tumult of Brexit and the the recommendations and is now in the process of allocating US elections, Israel seemed at times like an island of stability. a half-billion-shekel budget in line with these proposals. This However, under the surface, Israeli society is changing, and IDI success story illustrates the potential of turning relatively small took on a leading role in identifying those changes and working philanthropic investments into large-scale transformational with policymakers to address them. change by affecting policy and legislation on the basis of outstanding applied research. As the report that follows lays out, 2016 was a year rich in activity and achievements. In this letter, we have chosen to single Several new scholars joined our team in 2016. Ms. Daphna out the impact one program had on government policy in the Aviram-Nitzan, former director of research for the Israel employment area.
[Show full text]
Privatizing Religion: the Transformation of Israel's
Privatizing religion: The transformation of Israel’s Religious- Zionist community BY Yair ETTINGER The Brookings Institution is a nonprofit organization devoted to independent research and policy solutions. Its mission is to conduct high-quality, independent research and, based on that research, to provide innovative, practical recommendations for policymakers and the public. The conclusions and recommendations of any Brookings publication are solely those of its author(s), and do not reflect the views of the Institution, its management, or its other scholars. This paper is part of a series on Imagining Israel’s Future, made possible by support from the Morningstar Philanthropic Fund. The views expressed in this report are those of its author and do not represent the views of the Morningstar Philanthropic Fund, their officers, or employees. Copyright © 2017 Brookings Institution 1775 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20036 U.S.A. www.brookings.edu Table of Contents 1 The Author 2 Acknowlegements 3 Introduction 4 The Religious Zionist tribe 5 Bennett, the Jewish Home, and religious privatization 7 New disputes 10 Implications 12 Conclusion: The Bennett era 14 The Center for Middle East Policy 1 | Privatizing religion: The transformation of Israel’s Religious-Zionist community The Author air Ettinger has served as a journalist with Haaretz since 1997. His work primarily fo- cuses on the internal dynamics and process- Yes within Haredi communities. Previously, he cov- ered issues relating to Palestinian citizens of Israel and was a foreign affairs correspondent in Paris. Et- tinger studied Middle Eastern affairs at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and is currently writing a book on Jewish Modern Orthodoxy.
[Show full text]
Israel 8; World 0 GENEVA, Nov
Editorials ..................................... 4A Op-Ed .......................................... 5A Calendar ...................................... 6A Scene Around ............................. 9A Synagogue Directory ................ 11A News Briefs ............................... 13A WWW.HERITAGEFL.COM YEAR 44, NO. 12 NOVEMBER 22, 2019 24 CHESHVAN, 5780 ORLANDO, FLORIDA SINGLE COPY 75¢ UN condemnation: Israel 8; world 0 GENEVA, Nov. 15, 2019—A against Israel by December, United Nations General As- the same European nations sembly committee today have failed to introduce a adopted eight resolutions that single UNGA resolution on single out or condemn Is- the human rights situation rael, and zero on the entire in China, Venezuela, Saudi rest of the world. Arabia, Belarus, Cuba, Turkey, The texts condemn Is- Pakistan, Vietnam, Algeria, rael for “repressive measures” or on 175 other countries,” against Syrian citizens in the said Neuer. Golan Heights, renew the Earlier this year, 155 Ger- mandate of the corrupt UN man MPs called on the Ger- Relief and Works Agency, and man government to “dissoci- renew the mandate of the UN’s ate from unilateral, primarily “special committee to inves- politically motivated initia- tigate Israeli practices affect- tives and alliances of anti- ing the human rights of the Israeli Member States, and Yonatan Sindel/Flash90 Palestinian people and other protect Israel and legitimate An Iron Dome air-defense system set up in Sderot in southern Israel near the border with Gaza on Nov. 13, 2019. Arabs of the Occupied Terri- Israeli interests from unilat- tories.” All 193 UN member eral condemnation” in the states belong to the Special UN. In 2017, Dutch parlia- Israel waits to see if Gaza Strip stabilizes Political and Decolonization ment resolved to “actively Committee, or Fourth Com- oppose UN organizations By Yaakov Lappin Strip.
[Show full text]
Download File
Columbia University Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Human Rights Studies Master of Arts Program Silencing “Breaking the Silence”: The Israeli government’s agenda respecting human rights NGOs activism since 2009 Ido Dembin Thesis Adviser: Prof. Yinon Cohen Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts 12 September, 2018 Abstract This research examines a key aspect in the deterioration of Israeli democracy between 2009-2018. Mainly, it looks at Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's Right-wing governments utilization of legislative procedure to limit the right to free speech. The aspects of the right to free speech discussed here pertain to dissenting and critical activism against these government’s policies. The suppression of said right is manifested in the marginalization, delegitimization and ultimately silencing of its expression in Human Rights NGOs activism. To demonstrate this, the research presents a case study of one such NGO – “Breaking the Silence” – and the legal and political actions designed to cause its eventual ousting from mainstream Israeli discourse. The research focuses on the importance and uniqueness of this NGO, as well as the ways in which the government perceives and acts against it. First, it analyzes the NGO’s history, modus operandi and goals, emphasizing the uniqueness that makes it a particularly fascinating case. Then, it researches the government’s specific interest in crippling and limiting its influence. Finally, it highlights the government’s toolbox and utilization thereof against it. By shining a light on this case, the research seeks to show the process of watering down of a fundamental right within Israeli democracy – which is instrumental to understanding the state’s risk of decline towards illiberal democracy.
[Show full text]
CC of CPI Report to 25Th Congress
Summary of the report of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Israel to the 25th Congress 31 May – 2 June 2007 Chapter 1: Corporate globalization and the struggle against it The globalization of capital and the rapid growth of modern industry, technology, information systems and media have been exploited by capital in an attempt to concentrate the control of resources, capital and wage labor. But this has also created the material basis for the international workers‟ solidarity exemplified in Marx and Engels‟ slogan: “Workers of the world, unite!” The adoption of the neo-liberal model has aggravated socioeconomic inequality, both within nations and between rich and poor countries, to an unprecedented level, while increasing the numbers of unemployed people, poor workers, women, children and older people living in miserable conditions. In the first decade of the 21st century, wealth continues to be concentrated in the hands of the two hundred largest multinational corporations – that is, in the hands of a few hundred billionaires – while the majority of humanity is forced to live in poverty, lacking basic necessities such as clean water, food, housing, schools and hospitals. The US administration continues to sabotage all attempts to reach meaningful international agreement on ways to curtail global warming (the greenhouse effect), thus endangering the very existence of the human race on Earth. The Bush Administration cynically exploits the concept of democracy in an attempt to conceal a cruel policy of conquest, destruction of social rights and impingement on democratic rights within the USA. “The war on terror” is the latest phase of the US attempt to create a “new world order”.
[Show full text]
1 Schlaglicht Israel Nr. 7/16 Aktuelles Aus Israelischen Tageszeitungen 1
Schlaglicht Israel Nr. 7/16 Aktuelles aus israelischen Tageszeitungen 1.-15. April Die Themen dieser Ausgabe 1. Rassentrennung im Krankenhaus ........................................................................................................................ 1 2. Soldat erschießt bewusstlosen Terroristen ........................................................................................................... 3 3. Herzog und Deri unter Verdacht ........................................................................................................................... 5 4. Medienquerschnitt ................................................................................................................................................ 6 1. Rassentrennung im Krankenhaus we see in hospitals. Patients, doctors, visitors and Bezalel Smotrich, Abgeordneter der Siedlerpartei other staff represent every grouping in Israel, Jew, Habayit Hayehudi, rechtfertigt die Rassentrennung Muslim and Christian, religious and secular, refugee im Kreißsaal israelischer Krankenhäuser. Es sei and citizen alike. In Israeli hospitals, there is no ganz normal, so tat er via Twitter kund, wenn seine “occupier” or “occupied,” only doctors and nurses Frau es ablehne, ihr Kind zu entbinden, wenn neben and those they care for. They can be showcased as ihr eine Frau liege, deren Kind in 20 Jahren sein a great example of co-existence. MK Bezalel Kind ermorden könnte. Parteichef Naftali Bennett Smotrich’s comments on the topic represent the distanzierte sich von Smotrich,
[Show full text]
To Download / View the Haaretz English Ad As A
They have already given their interpretation of democracy Minister Naftali Bennett and Knesset Members Zeev Elkin, Gila Gamliel, Aryeh Deri, Tzachi Hanegbi, Tzipi Hotovely and Ayelet Shaked have cancelled their participation in the Haaretz Conference on Democracy because the New Israel Fund is among its sponsors. For the boycotters, democracy means disregard of the weak, the rejected, those who lack rights, those who are discriminated against economically and those who are excluded because of their beliefs. To the glory of the state of Israel, the New Israel Fund exists with the understanding that democracy is also the defense of minority rights and it expressly extends a hand to the weak, the discriminated against and the excluded, aiding the existence of non-proﬁt organizations that promote their rights. The politicians of the right and Aryeh Deri (defender of the transparent) cannot tolerate this. Here is a detailed list of the organizations funded by the NIF and its supporters in 2013 (from the Fund’s internet site): Core Grants Noar Kahalcha 30,000 Hotline for Migrant Workers 71,063.57 Darna- Jaffa Popular Committee for Land Allocation 4,577.79 Ne’emanei Torah Va’Avodah 7,000 emocracy and Human and Civil Rights Sister for Women in Israel 116,000 Human Rights Defenders Fund (HRDF) 43,920.24 Economic Empowerment for Women 7,500 Oranim: Hamidrasha Center for Study Fellowship 28,873.71 Adalah: Legal Center for Arab Minority Rights in Israel 57,875 Social Economic Association (SEA) 67,000 Humans Without Borders 6,818.32 Fidel: Association
[Show full text]
Whose Side Are We On? Viewers’ Reactions to the Use of Irony in News Interviews
Pragmatics 25:2. 149-178 (2015) International Pragmatics Association DOI: 10.1075/prag.25.2.02hir WHOSE SIDE ARE WE ON? VIEWERS’ REACTIONS TO THE USE OF IRONY IN NEWS INTERVIEWS Galia Hirsch Abstract This research seeks to identify and analyze the reaction to irony in Israeli political news interviews, in view of the specific nature of this genre, which has been known to allow a certain level of adversarialness (Liebes et al. 2008; Blum-Kulka 1983; Weizman 2008; Clayman &Heritage 2002a and 2002b). Our intention was to examine whether the audience regards the use of irony as over-aggressive, and whether they believe interviewees regard it as such, in order to shed light on the potential consequences the use of indirect discourse patterns has for the interviewer. Based on Goffman's (1981) notion of footing, and on the concept of positioning as defined by Weizman (2008: 16), we focused on the audience's capacity to grasp the positioning and repositioning in the interaction as a possible influential factor in their reaction to the employment of irony. The research is based on two conceptual paradigms: Media studies and pragmatic studies of irony. The findings indicate that Israeli audiences tend to regard interviewers' employment of irony in political interviews as slightly hostile, and as such it is viewed as a possible threat to interviewees' face (Goffman 1967), but also as a legitimate and comprehensible tool, especially when the irony is accompanied by humor or mitigating non-verbal signs. Hence, the risk for the interviewer is not as great as we assumed.
[Show full text]