DOCSLIB.ORG

Delicate Urbanism in Context: Settlement Nucleation in Pre-Roman Germany

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Delicate Urbanism in Context: Settlement Nucleation in Pre-Roman Germany McDONALD INSTITUTE CONVERSATIONS Delicate urbanism in context: Settlement nucleation in pre-Roman Germany The DAAD Cambridge Symposium Edited by Simon Stoddart Delicate urbanism in context McDONALD INSTITUTE CONVERSATIONS Delicate urbanism in context: Settlement nucleation in pre-Roman Germany The DAAD Cambridge Symposium Edited by Simon Stoddart with contributions from Ines Balzer, Manuel Fernández-Götz, Colin Haselgrove, Oliver Nakoinz, Axel G. Posluschny, Gerd Stegmaier, Anthony Snodgrass, Peter Wells, Günther Wieland, Katja Winger and Caroline von Nicolai Published by: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research University of Cambridge Downing Street Cambridge, UK CB2 3ER (0)(1223) 339327 [email protected] www.mcdonald.cam.ac.uk McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 2017 © 2017 McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research. Delicate urbanism in context: Settlement nucleation in pre-Roman Germany is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 (International) Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ISBN: 978-1-902937-83-0 Cover design by Dora Kemp and Ben Plumridge. Typesetting and layout by Ben Plumridge. Front cover: the Goldberg; back cover: the Danube at Kelheim. Edited for the Institute by James Barrett (Series Editor). Contents Contributors vi Figures vii Tables viii Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Simon Stoddart (Cambridge) Part 1 Regional differences 7 Chapter 2 Early Iron Age Fürstensitze – some thoughts on a not-so-uniform phenomenon 9 Axel G. Posluschny (Glauberg) Chapter 3 Urbanism of the oppida: a case study from Bavaria 27 Caroline von Nicolai (Munich) Chapter 4 Ritual, society and settlement structure: driving forces of urbanization during the second and first century bc in southwest Germany 41 Gerd Stegmaier (Tübingen) Part 2 The rural dimension 49 Chapter 5 The rural contribution to urbanism: late La Téne Viereckschanzen in southwest Germany 51 Günther Wieland (Esslingen) Part 3 The funerary dimension 61 Chapter 6 Burial mounds and settlements: the funerary contribution to urbanism 63 Ines Balzer (Rome) Part 4 Comparative approaches 85 Chapter 7 Quantifying Iron Age urbanism (density and distance) 87 Oliver Nakoinz (Kiel) Chapter 8 Not built in a day – the quality of Iron Age urbanism by comparison with Athens and Rome 97 Katja Winger (Berlin) Part 5 Discussion 103 Chapter 9 Discussing Iron Age urbanism in Central Europe: some thoughts 105 Manuel Fernández-Götz (Edinburgh) Chapter 10 Urbanization in Iron Age Germany and beyond 111 Colin Haselgrove (Leicester) Chapter 11 Urbanism: a view from the south 115 Anthony Snodgrass (Cambridge) Chapter 12 On the origins and context of urbanism in prehistoric Europe 117 Peter Wells (Minnesota) Bibliography 120 Index 134 v Contributors Ines Balzer Anthony Snodgrass Deutsches Archäologisches Institut Rom, Via Faculty of Classics, Sidgwick Avenue, Cambridge, Valadier 37, 00193 Rome, Italy. CB3 9DA, UK. Manuel Fernández-Götz Simon Stoddart Lecturer in Archaeology, School of History, Classics Magdalene College, Cambridge, CB3 0EU, UK. and Archaeology, University of Edinburgh, William Robertson Wing, Old Medical School, Teviot Place, Peter Wells Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK. Department of Anthropology, University of Minnesota, 395 HHH Ctr, 301 19th Ave S, Colin Haselgrove Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. School of Archaeology and Ancient History, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, Günther Wieland LE1 7RH, UK. Landesamt für Denkmalpflege im Regierungspräsidium Stuttgart, Archäologische Oliver Nakoinz Denkmalpflege Ref. 84.1, Fachgebiet Prospektion, Johanna-Mestorf Akademie / Institut für Ur- und Dokumentation und Archäobiowissenschaften, Frühgeschichte, Christian-Albrechts-Universität, Berliner Str. 12, 73728 Esslingen, Germany. Leibnizstraße 3, D - 24118 Kiel, Germany. Katja Winger Axel G. Posluschny Institut für Prähistorische Archäologie, Freie Keltenwelt am Glauberg, Am Glauberg 1, 63695 Universität Berlin, Fabeckstr. 23-25, 14195 Berlin, Glauburg, Germany. Germany. Gerd Stegmaier Caroline von Nicolai Institut für Ur- und Frühgeschichte und Archäologie Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Institut des Mittelalters, Eberhard Karls Universität für Vor- und Frühgeschichtliche Archäologie und Tübingen, Schloss Hohentübingen, Provinzialrömische Archäologie, Geschwister- D-72070 Tübingen, Germany. Scholl-Platz 1, 80539 München, Germany. vi Figures 1.1 Principal region of study. 2 2.1 Map of Princely Sites mentioned in the text. 10 2.2 Area of the magnetometer survey on the Glauberg. 11 2.3 The bronze Celtic style Schnabelkanne from the Princely burial 1 from the Glauberg. 12 2.4 The bronze Celtic style Röhrenkanne from grave 2 from the Glauberg. 13 2.5 Bronze double mask fibula from grave 3 from the Glauberg. 13 2.6 Life-size sandstone statue from a ditch at burial mound 1 from the Glauberg. 14 2.7 Model of a settlement hierarchy for the Early Iron age and alternative hierarchical model 15 2.8 20-km viewsheds from the Heuneburg and Bussen mountain. 17 2.9 Viewsheds of the Hallstatt settlements and Early La Tène settlements in the area around the Glauberg. 18 2.10 Slope based least cost path model of possible routes connecting sites with line-decorated pottery, also found on the Glauberg. 19 2.11 Location of the Princely grave on the Glauberg. 20 2.12 Sizes of the catchment areas that are reachable on foot within a one hour from a settlement. 22 2.13 Core settlement areas of the Marienberg environs in the Urnfield and the Hallstatt periods.y. 23 2.14 Core settlement areas of the Glauberg environs in the Urnfield and the Hallstatt periods. 23 2.15 Early Celtic style Fürstensitze and their relation to the borders of larger regions and major rivers. 24 2.16 Share of settlement sites per 100 years for the Late Bronze Age the Early Iron Age Hallstatt and the Early La Tène period. 25 3.1 Oppida and open agglomerations in the modern federal state of Bavaria. 28 3.2 Manching. 29 3.3 Kelheim. 30 3.4 Fentbachschanze. 31 3.5 Schwanberg. 32 3.6 Berching-Pollanten. 34 3.7 Passau. 35 3.8 Straubing. 36 4.1 Diagram of factors which favoured and led to a process of centralization and the foundation of oppida. 42 4.2 Map of southwest Germany with the two regions of investigation: Heidengraben and Heunebur. 43 4.3 Map of the Late La Tène oppidum Heidengraben. 44 4.4 Plan of the Burrenhof cemetery with Early Iron Age burial mounds and the complex Late Iron Age system of ditches. 45 4.5 Diagram of individual interests that influenced the process of centralization and dispersal during the Late La Tène period. 47 5.1 Aerial view of the well preserved Viereckschanze of Westerheim. 52 5.2 Ground plans and orientation of Viereckschanzen from Baden-Württemberg. 53 5.3 Plan and drawing of the finds from the excavation of K. Schumacher at the Viereckschanze of Gerichtstetten. 54 5.4 Example of a very well preserved rampart at Gerichtstetten. 55 5.5 Range of functional features of the Viereckschanzen. 56 5.6 Plan of the Viereckschanze of Königheim-Brehmen. 57 5.7 Plan of the excavated Viereckschanze of Ehningen. 58 6.1 Magdalenenberg. 65 6.2 Kappel am Rhein. 65 6.3 Burial mounds of Ha D1 to Ha D3 in the region of the Heuneburg and the Hohmichele and other burial mounds. 66 6.4 The Außensiedlung near the Heuneburg. 67 6.5 Clans drawn in from peripheral settlements to the Heuneburg and Außensiedlung and the settlement structures of the Heuneburg. 68 6.6 The Münsterberg of Breisach. 69 6.7 The occupation of the Münsterberg in Breisach. 70 6.8 The Heuneburg and the rebuilt Gießübel-Talhau-Nekropole. 71 6.9 The Hohenasperg. 72 vii 6.10 The Hohenasperg near Stuttgart: Princely tombs. 73 6.11 Settlements of the Iron Age in the region of the Hohenasperg. 74 6.12 The Ipf near Bopfingen: digital terrain model with the fortification-system. 75 6.13 The two hillforts Ipf and Goldberg. 75 6.14 Niedererlbach. 76 6.15 Glauburg-Glauberg. 78 6.16 Glauburg-Glauberg: Tumulus 1 and environs. 79 6.17 Glauburg-Glauberg. Tombs 1 and 2 of Tumulus 1 and the sandstone statue. 80 6.18 Korntal-Münchingen Lingwiesen excavation. 81 6.19 Glauburg-Glauberg: aerial photo of the rebuilt Tumulus 1 and the ditch-system. 82 7.1 Global temperature, colluvial layers in southwest Germany, the Heuneburg population and the number of sites in the Heuneburg area mapped onto the same graph. 92 7.2 Factors influencing the behaviour of the two types of actors in the two agent based models. 93 7.3 Populations of some settlements and interpretation according to one simulation run of abm 2. 93 7.4 An alternative narrative of the Heuneburg development. 94 8.1 Ground plan of the acropolis of Athens and idealized ‘drone’ image of the acropolis of the Heuneburg. 98 8.2 Ground plans of Rome with the area surrounded by the Servian Wall marked in yellow and the oppidum of Manching with the main excavations. 100 8.3 Diversity of building structures in the northern part of the ‘Südumgehung’ at Manching. 101 9.1 Theoretical diagram of relations between the oppidum and its surrounding rural territory, based on the data of the Titelberg area during La Tène D. 107 9.2 Two examples of Iron Age low-density urbanism. A) Heuneburg; B) Bourges. 108 9.3 Idealized model of the Heuneburg agglomeration. 109 9.4 Idealized reconstruction of the centre of the oppidum of Corent. 110 Tables 2.1 Functions of Central Places and their appearance at Early Iron Age Fürstensitze. 16 3.1 Comparison of urban attributes of the sites. 33 7.1 The effect of some kinds of complexity reduction on two community size thresholds. 91 9.1 Archaeological urban attributes, with an application to the Heuneburg and Manching. 106 viii Chapter 8 Not built in a day – the quality of Iron Age urbanism by comparison with Athens and Rome Katja Winger (Berlin) This paper is derived from my presentation at the Christaller asserted settlement function as ‘central symposium where my task was to discuss the quality places’ providing certain services to their hinterland of Iron Age urbanism.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Burial of the Urban Poor in Italy in the Late Republic and Early Empire
    Death, disposal and the destitute: The burial of the urban poor in Italy in the late Republic and early Empire Emma-Jayne Graham Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Archaeology University of Sheffield December 2004 IMAGING SERVICES NORTH Boston Spa, Wetherby West Yorkshire, LS23 7BQ www.bl.uk The following have been excluded from this digital copy at the request of the university: Fig 12 on page 24 Fig 16 on page 61 Fig 24 on page 162 Fig 25 on page 163 Fig 26 on page 164 Fig 28 on page 168 Fig 30on page 170 Fig 31 on page 173 Abstract Recent studies of Roman funerary practices have demonstrated that these activities were a vital component of urban social and religious processes. These investigations have, however, largely privileged the importance of these activities to the upper levels of society. Attempts to examine the responses of the lower classes to death, and its consequent demands for disposal and commemoration, have focused on the activities of freedmen and slaves anxious to establish or maintain their social position. The free poor, living on the edge of subsistence, are often disregarded and believed to have been unceremoniously discarded within anonymous mass graves (puticuli) such as those discovered at Rome by Lanciani in the late nineteenth century. This thesis re-examines the archaeological and historical evidence for the funerary practices of the urban poor in Italy within their appropriate social, legal and religious context. The thesis attempts to demonstrate that the desire for commemoration and the need to provide legitimate burial were strong at all social levels and linked to several factors common to all social strata.
    [Show full text]
  • Ritual Cleaning-Up of the City: from the Lupercalia to the Argei*
    RITUAL CLEANING-UP OF THE CITY: FROM THE LUPERCALIA TO THE ARGEI* This paper is not an analysis of the fine aspects of ritual, myth and ety- mology. I do not intend to guess the exact meaning of Luperci and Argei, or why the former sacrificed a dog and the latter were bound hand and foot. What I want to examine is the role of the festivals of the Lupercalia and the Argei in the functioning of the Roman community. The best-informed among ancient writers were convinced that these were purification cere- monies. I assume that the ancients knew what they were talking about and propose, first, to establish the nature of the ritual cleanliness of the city, and second, see by what techniques the two festivals achieved that goal. What, in the perception of the Romans themselves, normally made their city unclean? What were the ordinary, repetitive sources of pollution in pre-Imperial Rome, before the concept of the cura Urbis was refined? The answer to this is provided by taboos and restrictions on certain sub- stances, and also certain activities, in the City. First, there is a rule from the Twelve Tables with Cicero’s curiously anachronistic comment: «hominem mortuum», inquit lex in duodecim, «in urbe ne sepelito neve urito», credo vel propter ignis periculum (De leg. II 58). Secondly, we have the edict of the praetor L. Sentius C.f., known from three inscrip- tions dating from the beginning of the first century BC1: L. Sentius C. f. pr(aetor) de sen(atus) sent(entia) loca terminanda coer(avit).
    [Show full text]
  • Template for the EFS-Liu Conference
    Paper from the Conference “INTER: A European Cultural Studies Conference in Sweden”, organised by the Advanced Cultural Studies Institute of Sweden (ACSIS) in Norrköping 11-13 June 2007. Conference Proceedings published by Linköping University Electronic Press at www.ep.liu.se/ecp/025/. © The Author. Assessing the ‘Fascist Filter’ and its Legacy* Frederick Whitling Department of History and Civilisation, European University Institute, Italy [email protected] The extensive physical alterations to the city of Rome in the Fascist period have arguably created what I refer to as a ‘Fascist filter’, which will be tentatively discussed here. This paper investigates perceptions of what I refer to as “low status ruins” from antiquity in the modern city of Rome, focusing on the Servian wall in the context of the Termini train station in Rome. What are the possible functions, meanings, and practical implications of ruins in a modern cityscape? How are they ‘remembered’ or envisaged as (classical) heritage? I will in the following tentatively discuss the possible contextual value of Ancient ruins in Rome, focusing on the legacy of the ‘Fascist filter’. * This paper is based on an oral presentation, hence the absence of references. 645 Introduction The normative ‘master narrative’ of Ancient Greece and Rome as the foundation on which Western civilisation rests, incarnated in the classical tradition, still implies that we ‘understand’ antiquity, that there are ‘direct channels’ (tradition) through which ‘we’ (as Europeans) are in direct contact with ‘our’ past. The complexity of classical tradition and what I have chosen to call the ‘Fascist filter’ arguably rule out the possibility of such comprehension.
    [Show full text]
  • Rome's Busy Streets
    SPRING 2008 VOLUME III, ISSUE 1 THE FORUM ROMANUM News from the University of Dallas Eugene Constantin Rome Campus at Due Santi A.D. 79: Spring Romers on the Bay of Naples In early February, the Spring ‘08 Rome students packed their bags and boarded buses in preparation for a trip to the Bay of Naples. The overnight junket, led by faculty and staff, was meant to introduce students to the kind of educational travel that so enhances classroom studies on the Rome Campus by providing an opportunity to explore the region’s abundance of Greco-Roman art and history. The bus ride to Naples provided a magnificent view of the volcano Vesuvius (see photo above)—a reminder that the mountain’s eruption in A.D. 79 rocked the Roman world and destroyed cities like Pompeii and Herculaneum. Once in Naples, the first stop was at the National Archaeological Museum for a visit to its renowned antiquities collection. Under the guidance of Rome faculty, students spent the afternoon studying art and objects from the ancient world, in particular those frescoes, mosaics, and objects of daily life recovered from excavations at Pompeii. Departing Naples, the group headed further south to the seaside town of Castellamare di Stabiae, where they checked into rooms at the Vesuvian Institute just in time to enjoy a spectacular sunset across the Bay of Naples. The evening brought a bountiful meal and a spectacular performance of music on ancient instruments. The next day was spent in the ancient city of Pompeii. Covered by pumice and ash when Vesuvius erupted, the city was redis- covered in the middle of the eighteenth century and is still under excavation.
    [Show full text]
  • • Late Roman Empire • Germanic Invasions • Emperor Constantine • Christianity LATE ROMAN EMPIRE
    • Late Roman Empire • Germanic invasions • Emperor Constantine • Christianity LATE ROMAN EMPIRE MEDITERRANEAN as MARE NOSTRUM = our sea GERMANIC INVASIONS OF 3rd CENTURY AD 250-271 271 Aurelian wall in red Servian wall in black AURELIAN WALL 271 AD built by Emperor Aurelian for defense of city against German invaders Military revolution of 3rd Century begins with temporary measures under Marcus Aurelius: resorts to conscription of slaves, gladiators, criminals, barbarians (Germans) Septimus Severus 193-211 opens Praetorian Guard to Germans increasing militarization, rise in taxes rise of provincials and Germans in army: Diocletian: son of freedman from Dalmatia social revolution in army and ruling class Diocletian 284-305 TETRARCHY 284-305 AD “rule of four” DIOCLETIAN’S REORGANIZATION OF EMPIRE: Motives: 1) military defense of frontiers 2) orderly succession Four rulers: two Augusti (Diocletian as Senior Augustus) they choose two Caesars (adopted successors, not their own sons) Four Prefectures and four capitals: none at Rome WHERE IS ROME? Four Prefectures and their capitals: GAUL ITALY ILLYRICUM ASIA | Capitals: | | | Trier Milan Sirmium Nicomedia (near Belgrade) (on Bosphorus Straits near Byzantium) Imperial government under Diocletian: 4 prefectures, each divided into 12 dioceses, which are then divided into 100 provinces for local government and tax collection Western Empire: capitols – Trier and Milan Eastern Empire: capitols – Sirmium and Nicomedia DIOCLETIAN’S DIVISION OF EMPIRE INTO 12 DIOCESES • Four Prefectures and their capitals: (none at Rome) • GAUL ITALY ILLYRICUM ASIA • Capitals: | | | • Trier Milan Sirmium Nicomedia (near Belgrade) (on Bosphorus near Byzantium) • Rulers: West East Senior Caesar Augustus Augustus Caesar Constantius Maximian Diocletian Maximianus | | (abdicate in 305 AD) Son Son | | Constantine Maxentius PALACE OF DIOCLETIAN, SPLIT (modern Croatia) Split (in modern Croatia) site of Diocletian’s palace BATHS OF DIOCLETIAN, ROME Basilica of San Marco Venice 11-12th C.
    [Show full text]
  • Appius Claudius Caecus 'The Blind'
    Appius Claudius Caecus ‘The Blind’ Faber est quisquis suae fortunae (‘Every man is architect of his own fortune’) Appius Claudius Caecus came from the Claudian gens, a prime patrician family that could trace its ancestors as far back as the decemvirs who authored Rome’s first laws (the Twelve Tables) in the mid-fifth century BC. Although many Roman families could boast successful ancestors, Appius Claudius Caecus has the distinction of being one the first characters in Roman history for whom a substantial array of material evidence survives: a road, an aqueduct, a temple and at least one inscription. His character and his nickname Caecus, ‘The Blind’, are also explained in historical sources. Livy (History of Rome 9.29) claims he was struck down by the gods for giving responsibilities of worship to temple servants, rather than the traditional family members, at the Temple of Hercules. Perhaps a more credible explanation is offered by Diodorus Siculus (20.36), who suggests that Appius Claudius said he was blind and stayed at home to avoid reprisals from the Senate after his time in office. In that case, his name was clearly coined in jest, as is often the case with cognomen. Appius Claudius Caecus, whether or not he was actually blind, is an illuminating case study in the ways that varying types of evidence (literature, inscriptions and archaeology) can be used together to recreate history. His succession of offices, not quite the typical progression of the cursus honorum, records a man who enjoyed the epitome of a successful career in Roman politics (Slide 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Unfolding Rome: Giovanni Battista Piranesiâ•Žs Le Antichit〠Romane
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2008 Unfolding Rome: Giovanni Battista Piranesi's Le Antichità Romane, Volume I (1756) Sarah E. Buck Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF VISUAL ARTS, THEATRE, AND DANCE UNFOLDING ROME: GIOVANNI BATTISTA PIRANESI’S LE ANTICHITÀ ROMANE, VOLUME I (1756) By Sarah E. Buck A Thesis submitted to the Department of Art History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Degree Awarded: Summer Semester, 2008 The members of the Committee approve the thesis of Sarah Elizabeth Buck defended on April 30th, 2008. ____________________________________ Robert Neuman Professor Directing Thesis ____________________________________ Lauren Weingarden Committee Member ____________________________________ Stephanie Leitch Committee Member Approved: ____________________________________________ Richard Emmerson, Chair, Department of Art History ____________________________________________ Sally E. McRorie, Dean, College of Visual Arts, Theatre and Dance The Office of Graduate Studies has verified and approved the above named committee members. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis grew out of a semester paper from Robert Neuman’s Eighteenth-Century Art class, one of my first classes in the FSU Department of Art History. Developing the paper into a larger project has been an extremely rewarding experience, and I wish to thank Dr. Neuman for his continual guidance, advice, and encouragement from the very beginning. I am additionally deeply grateful for and appreciative of the valuable input and patience of my thesis committee members, Lauren Weingarden and Stephanie Leitch. Thanks also go to the staff of the University of Florida-Gainesville’s Rare Book Collection, to Jack Freiberg, Rick Emmerson, Jean Hudson, Kathy Braun, and everyone else who has been part of my graduate school community in the Department of Art History.
    [Show full text]
  • The Appian Way 1 from Porta Capena to the Mausoleum of Caecilia Metella
    The Appian Way 1 from Porta Capena to the Mausoleum of Caecilia Metella (Miles I-III) - Inside the Walls By bike On foot This section of the Appian Way, called “the urban section” because it was part of the city in antiquity, starts from the central archaeological area, in front of the Circus Maximus and near the Baths of Caracalla. This is where the ancient Porta Capena (Capua Gate), the original departure point of the Appian Way and the Latin Way dating back to the Republican period, was located. The urban section ends at the Porta S. Sebastiano (St. Sebastian Gate), part of the walls built in the reign of the emperor Aurelian in the 3rd century AD. The monuments described along this section are currently not included in the Appia Antica Regional Park, which begins at Porta S. Sebastiano. Nevertheless, the monumental complex of the Appian Way represents a coherent context which must be described holistically beginning in the monumental center of Rome. 1) Porta Capena The Capua Gate was part of the earliest wall of Rome, called the “Servian Wall” because its construction was traditionally attributed to the sixth king of Rome, Servius Tullius, in the middle of the 6th century BC. The most recent studies confirm the existence of a wall circuit in cappellaccio tuff that can be associated chronologically with Servius Tullius, which was later restored and enlarged in the first half of the 4th century BC. The Appian and Latin Ways both started from this gate, which was located in front of the curved end of the Circus Maximus, and then separated in the area of the large square currently dedicated to Numa Pompilius.
    [Show full text]
  • The City Boundary in Late Antique Rome Volume 1 of 1 Submitted By
    1 The City Boundary in Late Antique Rome Volume 1 of 1 Submitted by Maria Anne Kneafsey to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Classics in December 2017. This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. Signature: ………………………………………………………………… 2 Abstract This thesis examines the changing meaning and conceptualisation of the city boundary of Rome, from the late republic and imperial periods into late antiquity. It is my aim in this study to present a range of archaeological and historical material from three areas of interest: the historical development of the city boundary, from the pomerium to the Aurelian wall, change and continuity in the ritual activities associated with the border, and the reasons for the shift in burial topography in the fifth century AD. I propose that each of these three subject areas will demonstrate the wide range of restrictions and associations made with the city boundary of Rome, and will note in particular instances of continuity into late antiquity. It is demonstrated that there is a great degree of continuity in the behaviours of the inhabitants of Rome with regard to the conceptualisation of their city boundary. The wider proposal made during the course of this study, is that the fifth century was significant in the development of Rome – archaeologically, historically, and conceptually – but not for the reasons that are traditionally given.
    [Show full text]
  • Student Guide Sample
    CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................ 4 Background for the Teacher ..................................................................................... 5 Teaching Guidelines .................................................................................................. 8 Roman History Review ........................................................................................... 10 Roman History Review Questions ........................................................................ 11 Section 1: Stanzas I-XII ............................................................................................ 12 Section 2: Stanzas XIII-XX ....................................................................................... 17 Section 3: Stanzas XXI-XXXIII ................................................................................ 19 Section 4: Stanzas XXXIV-LII ................................................................................. 23 Section 5: Stanzas LIII-LXX ..................................................................................... 27 APPENDIX Rome at the Time of Horatius ................................................................................ 32 Map: Etruria .............................................................................................................. 33 Map: Etruria - Latium - Umbria ............................................................................. 34 Map: Etruria (Blank)
    [Show full text]
  • The Hidden Father, Francesco Albertini.Pdf
    C.PP.S. Resource Series — 34 Michele Colagiovanni, C.PP.S. THE HIDDEN FATHER Francesco Albertini and the Missionaries of the Precious Blood TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction . 1 1 . Daily Life . 5 2 . From Intragna to Rome . 13 3 . The Mazzoneschis and the Albertinis . 19 4 . The Sources of His Spirituality . 25 5 . School and Society . 38 6 . An Interior Revolution . 47 7 . Family Reorganization . 60 8 . One Republic, Or Rather Two . 68 9 . Revolution In the Parish . 86 10 . A Fire Beneath the Ashes . 97 11 . The Association . 105 12. An Inflammatory Relic . 116 13 . The Revelatory Exile . 126 14 . Bastia, Corsica . 137 15 . Unshakeable . 152 16 . To Calvi: A Finished Man? . 161 17 . Deep Calls to Deep . 176 18 . Everyone Is in Rome . 183 19 . Reward and Punishment . 190 20 . The Great Maneuvers . 195 21 . Refounding . 207 22 . Women in the Field . 215 23 . An Experimental Diocese . 224 24 . A Pioneer Bishop . 233 25 . The Bishop and the Secretary . 243 26 . Death Comes Like a Thief . 252 27 . The Memory of the Just . 260 Epilogue . 262 Notes . 268 INTRODUCTION Most people familiar with Saint Gaspar know that Francesco Albertini was his spiritual director and was largely responsible for nurturing Gaspar’s devotion to the Precious Blood . Perhaps less well known is that it was Albertini, founder of the Archconfraternity of the Most Precious Blood, who wanted to see his association develop a clerical branch made up of priests who would renew the Church by spreading the devotion to the Blood of Christ . Albertini believed that Gaspar was exactly the right man to inaugurate this new venture, and he did all he could to encourage his beloved spiritual son to found the Missionaries of the Most Precious Blood 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Prologue 1. the Servian Wall Was Constructed During the Republic
    Notes 1 Prologue 1. The Servian Wall was constructed during the Republic, mostly during the fourth century BCE. During the time the Callistus Catacomb and other Christian catacombs were in their busiest period of use, the late third century, the Servian Wall was replaced by the massive Aurelian Wall. At the Appian Way, the exit point a traveler to the Callistus Catacomb likely would have used, the two walls were built relatively close to one another; at most other points, the Aurelian Wall greatly expanded the area of the city enclosed by walls. The Porta San Sebastiano is the gate in the current Aurelian Wall that most closely approximates the gate in the Servian Wall that Callistus would have taken. Of the Aurelian Wall, and other great walls of the period, Peter Brown has writ- ten that “walls replaced theaters, baths, and temples as the public building works par excellence. Carefully designed and massively built, they radiated the message of a calculated intention to survive, and to survive with Roman grandeur, even in a world that was felt to be less secure than it had been two centuries earlier.” Peter Brown, Through the Eye of a Needle: Wealth, the Fall of Rome, and the Making of Christianity in the West, 350–550 AD (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2012), 11. 2. The catacombs arose and flourished at a time of great change in the funerary habits of Rome, and indeed of the Mediterranean gener- ally. For reasons still debated by scholars, the fashion was shifting from cremation, which had prevailed in the late Republic and early Empire, to inhumation, which came to prevail in the third, fourth, and fifth centuries.
    [Show full text]