DOCSLIB.ORG

1St July 2015, at !10:20 A.M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

!BELIZE !No. 25/1/12 SENATE! st Wednesday, !1 July 2015 10:20 !A.M. Pursuant to the direction of Mr. President, in writing, dated 26th June 2015, the Senate met in the National Assembly Chamber in Belmopan on Wednesday, 1st July 2015, at !10:20 A.M. ***-***! ! Members Present: Senator, the Honourable Marco Pech – President Senator, the Honourable Godwin Hulse – Leader of Government Business and Minister of Labour, Local Government, Rural Development, National Emergency Management and Immigration and Nationality Senator, the Honourable Juliet Thimbriel – Vice President Senator, the Honourable Joy Grant – Minister of Energy, Science and Technology and Public Utilities Senator, the Honourable Charles Gibson – Minister of Public Service and Elections and Boundaries Senator, the Honourable Lisel Alamilla – Minister of Forestry, Fisheries and Sustainable Development Senator, the Honourable Gerardo Sosa Senator, the Honourable Lisa Shoman Senator, the Honourable Anthony Sylvestre, Jr. Senator, the Honourable Patrick Andrews Senator, the Honourable Markhelm Lizarraga Senator, the Honourable Rev. Fr. Noel Leslie !Senator, the Honourable Adelaida Guerra - Temporary Member! Absent: !Senator, the Honourable Ray Davis !MR. PRESIDENT in the Chair. !PRAYERS read by Mr. President. ! ! OATH OF ALLEGIANCE OF A NEW SENATOR SENATOR A. GUERRA: I, Adelaida Guerra, do swear that I will bear true faith and allegiance to Belize, and will uphold the constitution and the law, and I will conscientiously, impartially and to the best of my ability discharge my duties as Senator and do right to all manner of people without fear and favour, affection! or ill-will. So help me God. MR. PRESIDENT: Welcome to today’s sitting, Senator. !2 ! SENATOR A. GUERRA: Thank! you. ! ! ! ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT MR. PRESIDENT: Honourable Members, by letter dated June 26, 2015, Cabinet’s! recommendation has been signified to the following: 1. General Revenue Supplementary Appropriation (No. 2) (2014/2015) Bill, 2015; 2. General Revenue Supplementary Appropriation (2015/2016) Bill, ! 2015; !3. Petrocaribe Loans (Amendment) Bill, 2015; and 4. Cruise Ship Passenger Tax! Bill, 2015. ! BILLS! BROUGHT FROM THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES SENATOR G. HULSE (Leader of Government Business and Minister of Labour, Local Government, Rural Development, National Emergency Management and Immigration and Nationality): Pleasant good morning, Mr. President, and colleagues, first of all, I want to welcome Senator Adelaida Guerra to these Chambers. It increases the number of women participation in the Senate to five today.! So welcome to these proceedings. !Mr. President, I rise to take charge of the following Bills: 1. General Revenue Supplementary Appropriation (No. 2) (2014/2015) Bill, 2015; ! 2. General Revenue Supplementary Appropriation (2015/2016) Bill, 2015; ! 3. Petrocaribe Loans (Amendment) Bill, 2015; ! 4. Cruise Ship Passenger Tax Bill, 2015; and ! 5. Caribbean Community Climate Change Centre Bill, 2015. Mr. President, in accordance with Standing Order No. 49 (1) I move that the Bills! be taken through all their stages forthwith. MR. PRESIDENT: Honourable Members, the question is that the Bills be taken! through all their stages forthwith. All those in favour, kindly say aye; those against, kindly say no. I think the ayes! have it. !3 ! ! PAPERS SENATOR G. HULSE (Leader of Government Business and Minister of Labour, Local Government, Rural Development, National Emergency Management and Immigration and Nationality): Mr. President, I rise to lay on the Table Sessional Papers 162/1/12 - Fisheries (Hol Chan Marine Reserve) Regulations, 2015; 163/1/12 - Fisheries (Hol Chan Marine Reserve) Order, 2015; 164/1/12 - Supplementary Appropriation (No. 3) Schedule for Fiscal Year 2014/2015; 165/1/12 - Supplementary Appropriation Schedule for Fiscal Year 2015/2016; and 166/1/12 - The Fourteenth Annual Report of the Ombudsman of Belize for! the year 2014. MR. PRESIDENT: Honourable Members, those papers are order to lie on the Table.! ! MOTIONS RELATING TO THE BUSINESS OR SITTINGS OF THE ! SENATE SENATOR G. HULSE (Leader of Government Business and Minister of Labour, Local Government, Rural Development, National Emergency Management and Immigration and Nationality): Mr. President, I move that at its rising! today the Senate adjourn to a date to be fixed by the President. MR. PRESIDENT: Honourable Members, the question is that at its rising today! the Senate adjourn to a date to be fixed by the President. All those in favour, kindly say aye; those against, kindly say no. I think the ayes! have it. ! PUBLIC BUSINESS! A. GOVERNMENT! BUSINESS ! I MOTIONS 1. Resolution Authorizing the Acceptance by Belize to the Protocol Amending the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the ! World Trade Organization Motion, 2015. SENATOR G. HULSE (Leader of Government Business and Minister of Labour, Local Government, Rural Development, National Emergency Management and Immigration and Nationality): Mr. President, I move that WHEREAS, the Protocol amending the Marrakesh Agreement establishing the World Trade Organization (hereinafter called “the Protocol”) was done at Geneva on 27 November! 2014 (WT/L/940); AND WHEREAS, in accordance with its paragraph 4, the Protocol shall enter into force in accordance with Article X:3 of the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing! the World Trade Organization; AND WHEREAS, section 61(A)(2)(a) of the Belize Constitution as amended by the Belize Constitution (Fourth Amendment) Act (No. 39 of 2001) provides that the Senate shall authorize the acceptance of any protocol by the Government of Belize; !4 ! NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Senate authorizes the Government of Belize to accept the Protocol, a full text of which is hereto annexed.! SENATOR L. SHOMAN: Mr. President, there is absolutely no doubt that one of the important functions of the Senate is the ratification of treaties and protocols. All of these treaties and protocols, Mr. President, are important. But I am forgetting! my manners, Mr. President, and that is not a good thing. Let me start, first of all, with your indulgence, by welcoming our newest colleague, Senator Adelaida Guerra. It gives me special pleasure to be able to welcome another woman to this Honourable Chamber. I admit my bias in regard to having more women in the Senate. This is not to say anything at all negative about her predecessor; however, it’s lovely to have Senator Guerra here. I know that we can lean on her special skills. She is a teacher, and I’m sure she has a lot to teach all of us here today. So I look forward to working with you, Senator. Please know that my bench and I give you a warm welcome as well as all our support.! We look forward to working with you. Thank you. Mr. President, the job of the Senate sometimes is described as being a rubber stamp, and that is unfair because one of the important functions that we do have is not only the ratification of legislation, the passage of Bills, but we have an important part to play in legislation making. However, we also have an extremely important role to play in terms of these international protocols, conventions, agreements that we are asked to ratify by motion, and this says that, this is a motion saying that we authorize the acceptance of this protocol. Now I know that we got our papers, some of us, a little earlier than we usually do, and I was happy to have it because it allowed me the time to go and read through this. However, I keep saying, Mr. President, and one day I hope to be heard, that it would be good when these things come to us in the Senate that we be provided with either an explanation note or the same courtesy of the briefing notes that Cabinet gets when it considers these matters. There is absolutely no excuse or reason why the Executive should be given more privilege than the Legislators when it comes to these matters.! And so, Mr. President, I will not and I cannot in good conscience continue to simply just signify my acceptance of these things, even if they are important, even if they are necessary, without being given the benefit of a full explanation because, Mr. President, one of the things that is clear under almost all of these conventions is that they have deep implications for our national law and a lot of time, Mr. President, they place heavy obligations on us, as a country, for reporting. The next thing you know, either we don’t report, or we don’t provide the information, or we skip a step, or we don’t do something, and our country is shown up in the international stage as ignoring a convention which it has ratified. I’m not in favour of that. I’m not in favour of our continuing to just stand up and say, “Aye”, or sometimes nothing at all, and these things pass. I wish the Leader of Government Business to convey, once again, to the Attorney General’s Ministry who normally takes charge of these things that we expect to see explanation! notes on these things. They do exist, and we would like to have them. It is not fair to those of my colleagues, who necessarily don’t have the background to be able to thoroughly go through the international law implications that some of these conventions have and, for instance, this one in particular which I know the Leader of Government Business is probably quite skilled in because it has to do with international trade, and he has always been someone who has been very au fait with the rules and the obligations of that. I had the good fortune of !5 being able to work with him when I was the Minister responsible for foreign trade. And so I was able to read, understand and absorb what is in here. And what is clear to me is that my fellow Senators and I are being asked to ratify these things without notes of explanation, and it isn’t right.
Recommended publications
  • A Study of the Garifuna of Belize's Toledo District Alexander Gough

    A Study of the Garifuna of Belize's Toledo District Alexander Gough

    Indigenous identity in a contested land: A study of the Garifuna of Belize’s Toledo district Alexander Gough This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2018 Lancaster University Law School 1 Declaration This thesis has not been submitted in support of an application for another degree at this or any other university. It is the result of my own work and includes nothing that is the outcome of work done in collaboration except where specifically indicated. Many of the ideas in this thesis were the product of discussion with my supervisors. Alexander Gough, Lancaster University 21st September 2018 2 Abstract The past fifty years has seen a significant shift in the recognition of indigenous peoples within international law. Once conceptualised as the antithesis to European identity, which in turn facilitated colonial ambitions, the recognition of indigenous identity and responding to indigenous peoples’ demands is now a well-established norm within the international legal system. Furthermore, the recognition of this identity can lead to benefits, such as a stake in controlling valuable resources. However, gaining tangible indigenous recognition remains inherently complex. A key reason for this complexity is that gaining successful recognition as being indigenous is highly dependent upon specific regional, national and local circumstances. Belize is an example of a State whose colonial and post-colonial geographies continue to collide, most notably in its southernmost Toledo district. Aside from remaining the subject of a continued territorial claim from the Republic of Guatemala, in recent years Toledo has also been the battleground for the globally renowned indigenous Maya land rights case.
  • A Framework for Voter Education, Belize Elections and Boundaries

    A Framework for Voter Education, Belize Elections and Boundaries

    AA FrameworkFramework ForFor VoterVoter EducationEducation I. Myrtle Palacio Chief Elections Officer, BELIZE Elections and Boundaries Department January 2004 Table of Contents Background 1 Electoral Management Bodies of Belize 3 The “What Is” 4 About Us–A Profile 6 Selecting our Leaders– Past and Present 9 Introduction 10 Legislative Bodies– Selected Members 11 Elections Under Adult Suffrage 15 Elections After Adult Suffrage 17 Elections In Post-Independent Belize 19 The Who and How of Government 20 The Belize Constitution 21 What Is and Who Forms A Government? 22 The Legislative Branch 22 The House of Representatives The Senate The Executive Branch 23 The Governor General 23 The Prime Minister & Cabinet 23 The Public Service 24 Government Bodies 24 The Judicial Branch 25 The Magistrate Court 25 The Supreme Court 25 The Court of Appeal 25 The Privy Council 25 The Voting Process 26 Types of Elections 27 Who Conducts Elections? 27 Responsibilities of Election Officers 28 General 28 The Hierarchy 28 Returning Officer 28 Election Clerk 29 The Presiding Officer 29 Poll Clerk 30 Counting Clerk 30 Polling Agents and Candidates– Other Stakeholders 30 Nomination Procedure 31 Voting Procedure 32 Who can Vote? 33 Other Rules 33 Proxy Voter 34 Counting Rules 35 Voter Registration 36 Why Register to Vote? 37 Laws Pertaining to Voter Registration 37 Who is Eligible to Register? 37 Where to Register? 37 How Do You Become Registered? 38 On Objections 39 Revision Court 40 What Activities are Transacted? 41 Dealing With Disqualifications 41 Other Relevant Laws 42 The Referendum Act 43 Boundary Delimitation/Redistricting 45 The “What Is” 45 Historical Overview 46 Constituency and Boundary Changes 46 by Year of Change A Framework for Voter Education 1 ○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○ BACKGROUND he Objective of “A Framework for Voter Education” is to provide a resource Tfor organizations or individuals who wish to educate Belizeans on the rights and responsibilities of Electors, as well as those desirous of developing curricula in civics.
  • 26Th March 2015, in the National Assembly Chamber, !Belmopan, at 10:18 AM

    26Th March 2015, in the National Assembly Chamber, !Belmopan, at 10:18 AM

    !1 BELIZE ! No. HR26/1/11 ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES! th Thursday, 26 ! March, 2015 10:18! A.M ------! Pursuant to the Direction of Mr. Speaker on the 15th March 2015, the House met on Thursday, 26th March 2015, in the National Assembly Chamber, !Belmopan, at 10:18 AM. ! ! Members Present: The Hon. Michael Peyrefitte, Speaker The Hon. Dean O. Barrow (Queen’s Square), Prime Minister, Minister of Finance and Economic Development The Hon. Gaspar Vega (Orange Walk North), Deputy Prime Minister, Minister of Natural Resources and Agriculture The Hon. Erwin R. Contreras (Cayo West), Minister of Trade, Investment Promotion, Private Sector Development and Consumer Protection The Hon. Patrick J. Faber (Collet), Minister of Education, Youth and Sports The Hon. Manuel Heredia Jr. (Belize Rural South), Minister of Tourism and Culture The Hon. Anthony Martinez (Port Loyola), Minister of Human Development, Social Transformation and Poverty Alleviation The Hon. John Saldivar (Belmopan), Minister of National Security The Hon. Wilfred P. Elrington (Pickstock), Attorney General and Minister of Foreign Affairs The Hon. Rene Montero (Cayo Central), Minister of Works and Transport The Hon. Pablo S. Marin (Corozal Bay), Minister of Health The Hon. Santino Castillo (Caribbean Shores), Minister of State in the Ministry of Finance and Economic Development The Hon. Hugo Patt (Corozal North), Minister of State in the Ministry of Natural Resources and Agriculture The Hon. Herman Longsworth (Albert), Minister of State in the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports The Hon. Mark King (Lake Independence), Minister of State in the Ministry of Human Development, Social Transformation and Poverty Alleviation The Hon.
  • Case of Maya Indigenous Communities of Belize, Inter-Am

    Case of Maya Indigenous Communities of Belize, Inter-Am

    REPORT Nº 96/03 CASE 12.053 MAYA INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES OF THE TOLEDO DISTRICT BELIZE October 24, 2003 I. SUMMARY 1. This report concerns a petition presented to the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights (the "Commission”) against the State of Belize (the "State" or “Belize”) on August 7, 1998 by the Indian Law Resource Center and the Toledo Maya Cultural Council (the “Petitioners”). The petition claims that the State is responsible for violating rights under the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man (the “American Declaration”) that the Mopan and Ke’kchi Maya People of the Toledo District of Southern Belize (the “Maya people of the Toledo District” or the “Maya people”) are alleged to have over certain lands and natural resources.1 2. The Petitioners claim that the State has violated Articles I, II, III, VI, XI, XVIII, XX and XXIII of the American Declaration in respect of lands traditionally used and occupied by the Maya people, by granting logging and oil concessions in and otherwise failing to adequately protect those lands, failing to recognize and secure the territorial rights of the Maya people in those lands, and failing to afford the Maya people judicial protection of their rights and interests in the lands due to delays in court proceedings instituted by them. According to the Petitioners, the State’s contraventions have impacted negatively on the natural environment upon which the Maya people depend for subsistence, have jeopardized the Maya people and their culture, and threaten to cause further damage in the future. 3. The State has indicated before the Commission that applicable law and the facts presented by the Petitioners are unclear as to whether the Maya people may have aboriginal rights in the lands under dispute, although at the same time it has recognized in negotiations outside of the Commission proceedings that the Maya people have rights in lands in the Toledo District based upon their longstanding use and occupancy of that territory.
  • Private Lands Conservation in Belize

    Private Lands Conservation in Belize

    University of Colorado Law School Colorado Law Scholarly Commons Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Books, Reports, and Studies Resources, Energy, and the Environment 2004 Private Lands Conservation in Belize Joan Marsan University of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/books_reports_studies Part of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons, Environmental Law Commons, Environmental Policy Commons, Estates and Trusts Commons, Land Use Law Commons, Legislation Commons, Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, Natural Resources Law Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, Property Law and Real Estate Commons, and the Tax Law Commons Citation Information Joan Marsan, Private Lands Conservation In Belize (Natural Res. Law Ctr., Univ. of Colo. Sch. of Law 2004). JOAN MARSAN, PRIVATE LANDS CONSERVATION IN BELIZE (Natural Res. Law Ctr., Univ. of Colo. Sch. of Law 2004). Reproduced with permission of the Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Resources, Energy, and the Environment (formerly the Natural Resources Law Center) at the University of Colorado Law School. AVAILABLE ONLINE ====================; • •~ ~ ...... ~ ~ ~ .­~ PRIVATE LANDS CONSERVATION IN .~ BELIZE •_. -­~ • ~ ..­ A Country Report by the Natural Resources Law Center, ...... University of Colorado School of Law ~ 4 .­~ September 2004 ~ Sponsored by The Nature Conservancy Primary Author: Joan Marsan, NRLC Research Assistant KGA [email protected] 576 • M37 2004 Private Lands
  • Belize | Freedom House

    Belize | Freedom House

    6/5/2020 Belize | Freedom House FREEDOM IN THE WORLD 2020 Belize 86 FREE /100 Political Rights 35 /40 Civil Liberties 51 /60 LAST YEAR'S SCORE & STATUS 86 /100 Free Global freedom statuses are calculated on a weighted scale. See the methodology. https://freedomhouse.org/country/belize/freedom-world/2020 1/13 6/5/2020 Belize | Freedom House Overview Belize is a democracy that has experienced regular rotations of power through competitive elections. Civil liberties are mostly respected. Government corruption is a concern, as is the high rate of violent crime. Authorities have been slow to address persistent problems of police brutality and human trafficking within the country’s borders. Key Developments in 2019 In March, the opposition People’s United Party (PUP) filed a Supreme Court claim against Prime Minister and Finance Minister Dean Barrow and an aide, for allegedly spending $645 million from Petrocaribe without parliamentary authorization. The court heard the case in November, with a ruling due in January 2020. The US State Department’s annual Trafficking in Persons Report noted two new human trafficking prosecutions, the first in four years. A long-running border dispute with Guatemala remains unresolved. In March, three Guatemalan gun boats blocked a Belize Coast Guard patrol from accessing the Sarstoon River, which is part of Belizean territory. Political Rights A. Electoral Process A1 0-4 pts Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? 4 / 4 The prime minister, usually the leader of the largest party in the parliament, is head of government.
  • In the Supreme Court of Belize, A.D. 2007

    In the Supreme Court of Belize, A.D. 2007

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2007 CONSOLIDATED CLAIMS CLAIM NO. 171 OF 2007 BETWEEN: AURELIO CAL in his own behalf and on behalf of the MAVA VILLAGE OF SANTACRUZ and BASILIO TEUL, HIGINIO TEUL, MARCELINA CAL TEUL and SUSANO CANTI Claimants AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF BELIZE and THE MINISTER OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT Defendants CLAIM NO. 172 OF 2007 BETWEEN: MANUEL COY in his own behalf and on behalf of the MAYA VILLAGE OF CONEJO and MANUEL CAAL, PERFECTO MAKIN and MELINA MAKIN Claimants AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF BELIZE and THE MINISTER OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT Defendants University Of Hawaii School of Law Library - Jon Van Dyke Archives Collection BEFORE the Honourable Abdulai Conteh, Chief Justice. Ms. Antoinette Moore for the claimants. Ms. Nichola Cho with Mrs. Andrea McSweeney McKoy for the defendants. JUDGMENT 1. The Claimants and the Nature of their case This judgment relates to consolidated claims which raise essentially the same issue. All the claimants have in common the fact that they are members of Maya communities in Southern Belize. The first set of claimants in Claim No. 171 of 2007, live in the Maya village of Santa Cruz; and the first-named claimant Aurelio Cal is the elected Alcalde of the said village of Santa Cruz and he brings this claim on his own behalf and that of the claimant village. The other co-claimants are all members of the said village of Santa Cruz. The second set of claimants in Claim No. 172 of 2007 live in the Maya village of Conejo, and the first-named claimant, Manuel Coy, is the elected Alcalde of Conejo Village and he has brought this claim on his own behalf and that of the said Conejo Village.
  • Belize CARIBBEAN EMERGENCY LEGISLATION PROJECT (CELP)

    Belize CARIBBEAN EMERGENCY LEGISLATION PROJECT (CELP)

    CELP PROFILE Belize CARIBBEAN EMERGENCY LEGISLATION PROJECT (CELP) Legal Framework Constitution of Belize, 1981 Section 18 of the Constitution provides for the Declaration of a State of Emergency in Belize. According to the Section, ‘period of public emergency’ means any period during which - (a) Belize is engaged in any war; or (b) there is in force a proclamation by the Governor-General declaring that a state of public emergency exists; or Further, according to Section 18(9) the Governor- (c) there is in force a resolution of the National General may make such regulations as are Assembly declaring that democratic institutions in necessary or expedient for securing public safety, Belize are threatened by subversion. the defence of Belize, the maintenance of public According to Section 18(2) the Governor-General order and the suppression of mutiny, rebellion and may, by Proclamation which shall be published riot, and for maintaining supplies and services in the Gazette, declare that a state of public essential to the life of the community. Any such emergency exists. This power to proclaim a state regulations may empower such authorities or of emergency is effective only in circumstances persons as may be specified in the regulations where the Governor- General is satisfied that, inter to make orders and rules for any of the purposes alia, a public emergency has arisen as a result of for which such regulations are authorised by this the occurrence of any earthquake, hurricane, flood, subsection to be made and may contain such fire, outbreak of pestilence, outbreak of infectious incidental and supplementary provisions as are disease, or other similar calamity.
  • General Assembly Distr

    General Assembly Distr

    UNITED NATIONS A General Assembly Distr. GENERAL A/HRC/WG.6/5/BLZ/1 18 February 2009 Original: ENGLISH HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review Fifth session Geneva, 4-15 May 2009 NATIONAL REPORT SUBMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 15 (A) OF THE ANNEX TO HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL RESOLUTION 5/1 * Belize _________________________ * The present document was not edited before being sent to the United Nations translation services. GE.09- A/HRC/WG.6/5/BLZ/1 Page 2 I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY 1. Belize is firmly committed to the protection and promotion of human rights as evidenced by its Constitution, domestic legislation, adherence to international treaties and existing national agencies and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). 2. Belizean culture, democratic history and legal tradition has infused in Belizean society and government a deep respect for those fundamental human rights articulated in Part II of the Belize Constitution. Such fundamental freedoms as the right to assembly, the right to free speech and the right to due process are vigilantly guarded by Belizeans themselves. 3. As a developing country Belize views development as inextricably bound to the fulfilment of human rights making the right to development a fundamental right itself as asserted by the Declaration on the Right to Development. Thus, the Government of Belize has consistently adopted a human rights based approach in development planning, social services and general policy formulation and execution. 4. Belize’s national report for the Universal Periodic Review has been prepared in accordance with the General Guidelines for the Preparation of Information under the Universal Periodic Review, decision 6/102, as circulated adopted by the Human Rights Council on 27 September 2007.
  • Trevor Vernon Just Waiting for a Despotic Leader

    Trevor Vernon Just Waiting for a Despotic Leader

    Friday, June 29, 2007 The INdependent Reformer Page 1 The dependent IN Reformer Belize’s Rebel Paper Vol. 2 No. 25 Friday, June 29, 2007 $1.00 YYYankankankeeeeee RippaRippaRippa BushBush SerSerenadesenades CARICOMCARICOM It was a swell party, President George Bush inviting the heads of Caribbean governments to Washington, finally, as his days in the White House wind down. The regional leaders, seldom consulted even though they represent what some in the Beltway call the “soft underbelly” of the Americas as far as homeland se- curity is concerned, were given the chance to present their views, and needs. The conference, convened just a month after CARICOM heads ex- pressed some reluctance over pushing through a free trade agreement with the US, had that trade agreement as a cen- terpiece, although it was deftly sur- OAS top brass, Secretary General Jose Miguel Insulza, flanked by Permanent Representative of St. Vincent and the Grenadines Ambassador Elsworth John (left) and Assistant Secretary General Ambassador Albert Ramdin of Guyana (right) welcome Caribbean rounded by a host of issues including journalists to a seminar on June 18, the day before the opening of the Conference on the Caribbean violence in the region, health, tourism, education and investment. One key such as in the suggestion that a portion Bush at the US State Department, congress “review the Caribbean Basin component of the Conference on the of remittances should be used for in- Belize’s Prime Minister Said Musa at- Initiative Act and trade arrangements Caribbean was face to face meetings vestment rather than just to meet daily tended a question and answer session with the Caribbean.
  • IN the SUPREME COURT of BELIZE, A.D. 2007 Claim No. 171 Of

    IN the SUPREME COURT of BELIZE, A.D. 2007 Claim No. 171 Of

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2007 Claim No. 171 of 2007 BETWEEN AURELIO CAL in his own behalf and on behalf of the Maya VILLAGE OF SANTA CRUZ and BASILIO TEUL, HIGINIO TEUL, MARCELINA CAL TEUL, and SUSANO CANTI Claimants and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF BELIZE and THE MINISTER OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND THE ENVIRONMENT Defendants Claim No. 172 of 2007 BETWEEN MANUEL COY, in his own behalf and on behalf of the Maya VILLAGE OF CONEJO and MANUEL CAAL, PERFECTO MAKIN AND MELINA MAKIN Claimants and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF BELIZE and THE MINISTER OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND THE ENVIRONMENT Defendants SKELETON ARGUMENT OF THE CLAIMANTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ISSUES PRESENTED AS AGREED UPON BY THE PARTIES ............................................................ 3 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................ 3 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT........................................................................................................... 3 ARGUMENT .................................................................................................................................. 4 ISSUE I: Maya customary land tenure exists in southern Belize, as confirmed by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights .................................................................... 5 ISSUE II: The Members of Conejo and Santa Cruz villages have interests in lands based on Maya customary land tenure, and the nature of those interests is in accordance with the customary patterns
  • Election 2012-Descriptive Stastical Analysis-1

    Election 2012-Descriptive Stastical Analysis-1

    DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICAL ANALYSIS 2012 General Elections By Myrtle Palacio INTRODUCTION This is a generalized descriptive statistical analysis of the 2012 General Elections. Using 2008 as the base year for comparison with the 2012 Elections, the analysis will scrutinize the electoral divisions by administrative district. Voter turnout will be targeted in place of pure numbers primarily for uniformity, as the voter populations of electoral divisions are not equal, and may cause the outcome to be perceived as misleading. For example in Toledo West, the variance of win is 1,297 and in Fort George it is 487. In terms of pure numbers Toledo West demonstrates a party popularity of nearly three times that of Fort George. However the outcomes for both are nearly the same when the percentage is utilized: the PUP candidate in Toledo West garnered 62.45% voter popularity and the PUP candidate in Fort George garnered 61.92%. Voter turnout and party popularity indicate voter participation at the polls and to a great extent communicates voter behaviour or attitude; and the outcomes in the examples clearly conveys that nearly two- thirds of the Voters wanted the PUP. The data for this exercise come primarily from two tables in the Appendix, namely Appendix i “Summary Result of General Elections 1979 to 2012” and Appendix ii “Election Outcome by Division Party and Voter Participation”. Table ii compares the voter turnout of 2008 with that of the 2012 election by party and by division. The source for the tables and appendices are my recent publications and papers and the Elections and Boundaries Department for 2012 election result.