DOCSLIB.ORG

06/11347/AL October 2007

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
06/11347/AL October 2007 ARCADIS ECOLAS N.V. IEEP Roderveldlaan 3 Quai au Foin, 55 2600 Berchem 1000 Brussels Belgium Belgium Tel: +32 3 328.62.86 Tel: + 32 (0) 2 738 74 82 Fax: +32 3 328.62.87 Fax: + 32 (0) 2 732 40 04 http://www.arcadisecolas.be http://www.ieep.eu Contract N° 07010406/2006/441662/MAR/E3 Task 2 - Benefits for fYRoM and other countries of SEE of compliance with the environmental acquis Final Report– Part II: Country- specific report Albania The European Commission – DG Environment 06/11347/AL October 2007 Patrick ten Brink (IEEP) Ljupco Avramovski (Enviro-L) Stijn Vermoote (Arcadis Ecolas) Samuela Bassi (IEEP) Karen Callebaut (Arcadis Ecolas) Arnoud Lust (Arcadis Ecolas) Alistair Hunt (Metroeconomica) ARCADIS ECOLAS / IEEP / Metroeconomica / Enviro-L Content 06/11347 - Albania - Benefits of Compliance with environmental acquis - final report CONTENT CONTENT.................................................................................................................................... I LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .......................................................................................................III LIST OF TABLES .........................................................................................................................V LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................... VII LIST OF ANNEXES .................................................................................................................... IX EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................XI 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY – ALBANIA .................................................................................XI 1.1 Benefit assessment air related directives..............................................................................xi 1.2 Benefit assessment water related directives ........................................................................xii 1.3 Benefit assessment solid waste related directives ............................................................... xiii 1.4 Benefit assessment nature related directives ...................................................................... xiv 1.5 Summary overview – Albania............................................................................................ xvi 2 OBJECTIVES......................................................................................................................1 3 INTRODUCTION TO ALBANIA...........................................................................................3 3.1 The environment ............................................................................................................... 3 3.2 The Economy .................................................................................................................... 3 4 BENEFITS ASSESSMENT OF AIR RELATED DIRECTIVES...................................................5 4.1 Current status of AIR QUALITY ........................................................................................... 5 4.1.1 National and regional level ................................................................................................. 5 4.1.2 Air Quality Regulation ........................................................................................................ 7 4.1.3 Air Quality Monitoring ........................................................................................................ 7 4.2 QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT............................................................................................. 8 4.2.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 8 4.2.2 Methodology – The Impact Pathway Approach ..................................................................... 9 4.2.3 Emission Reduction Scenarios ............................................................................................. 9 4.2.4 Extent of Benefits ............................................................................................................ 10 4.3 MONETARY VALUATION: REDUCED AIR POLLUTION .......................................................... 12 4.3.1 Benefits upon full compliance............................................................................................ 12 4.3.2 Trans-boundary benefits................................................................................................... 13 4.4 Conclusions..................................................................................................................... 14 5 BENEFITS ASSESSMENT OF WATER RELATED DIRECTIVES...........................................15 5.1 Current status of different water uses and threats .............................................................. 15 5.1.1 Drinking water................................................................................................................. 15 5.1.2 Recreational uses of water................................................................................................ 16 5.1.3 River ecosystems............................................................................................................. 17 5.2 Assessment using qualitative and quantitative data............................................................. 18 5.2.1 Introduction to the Method of Assessment ......................................................................... 18 5.2.2 Benefits from improved drinking water quality and supply ................................................... 19 5.2.3 Benefits to recreational users of water............................................................................... 23 i ARCADIS ECOLAS / IEEP / Metroeconomica / Enviro-L Content 06/11347 - Albania - Benefits of Compliance with environmental acquis - final report 5.2.4 Benefits to river ecosystems ............................................................................................. 28 5.3 Monetary assessment....................................................................................................... 32 5.3.1 Benefits of Cleaner Drinking Water.................................................................................... 32 5.3.2 Bathing and other surface water quality – use values.......................................................... 33 5.3.3 Improved river ecosystem quality – non-use value.............................................................. 38 5.4 Aggregation of Benefits And Conclusions ........................................................................... 40 6 BENEFITS ASSESSMENT OF WASTE RELATED DIRECTIVES ...........................................47 6.1 Current status ................................................................................................................. 47 6.1.1 Waste generation and coverage ........................................................................................ 48 6.1.2 Recycling ........................................................................................................................ 49 6.1.3 Landfills .......................................................................................................................... 50 6.1.4 Packaging waste.............................................................................................................. 52 6.1.5 Incineration of waste ....................................................................................................... 52 6.1.6 Hazardous waste (HZW)................................................................................................... 53 6.1.7 Disposal of waste oil ........................................................................................................ 54 6.1.8 Batteries and accumulators............................................................................................... 54 6.1.9 Medical Hazardous waste ................................................................................................. 55 6.1.10 Disposal of PCB and PCT .................................................................................................. 55 6.1.11 TiO2 Directive .................................................................................................................. 55 6.2 Assessment using qualitative and quantitative data............................................................. 55 6.2.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 55 6.2.2 National targets for the future years in the field of waste management ................................ 55 6.2.3 Landfill Directive .............................................................................................................. 56 6.2.4 Packaging Directive.......................................................................................................... 63 6.3 Summary and interpretation of results............................................................................... 65 6.3.1 Summary results of the assessment .................................................................................. 65 6.3.2 Extent of the benefits....................................................................................................... 65 6.3.3 Summary of analysis approach.......................................................................................... 66 7 BENEFITS
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Baseline Assessment of the Lake Ohrid Region - Albania
    TOWARDS STRENGTHENED GOVERNANCE OF THE SHARED TRANSBOUNDARY NATURAL AND CULTURAL HERITAGE OF THE LAKE OHRID REGION Baseline Assessment of the Lake Ohrid region - Albania IUCN – ICOMOS joint draft report January 2016 Contents ........................................................................................................................................................................... i A. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... 1 B. The study area ........................................................................................................................................... 5 B.1 The physical environment ............................................................................................................. 5 B.2 The biotic environment ................................................................................................................. 7 B.3 Cultural Settings ............................................................................................................................ 0 C. Heritage values and resources/ attributes ................................................................................................ 6 C.1 Natural heritage values and resources ......................................................................................... 6 C.2 Cultural heritage values and resources....................................................................................... 12 D.
    [Show full text]
  • A4 Cover EN LQ
    BECOMEBECOME PARTPART OFOF THETHE IPARDIPARD PROGRAMPROGRAM 33RDRD CALLCALL WEWE SUPPORTSUPPORT THETHE DEVELOPMENTDEVELOPMENT OFOF ALBANIANALBANIAN AGRICULTUREAGRICULTURE 10 December 2020 - 25 January 2021 azhbr.gov.al - ipard.gov.al GRANTS SCHEMES IPARD II 2014-2020 Guideline for Applicants THIRD CALL FOR GRANT SUPPORT 10 December 2020 -25 January 2021 Measure 1 (All Sectors) And Measure 3 ( Sektor of Fruits – Vegitables) *Sector of Wine is not included SUPPORT OF GRANTS IS CO-FINANCED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION AND ALBANIAN GOVERNMENT EU contribution in total - 75% Contribution of Albanian Government in total - 25% 2020 Contents 1. Objectives, Priorities and Measures of the IPARD II Programme ............................................... 3 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Objectives of the IPARD II Programme for the period of 2014-2020 ........................................... 4 1.3 Key Definitions ................................................................................................................................... 6 2. Measure 1 - Investments in physical assets of Agricultural Holdings: ................................................ 7 2.1 Aid Intensity under Measure 1 ......................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Eligibility of Recipients under Measure 1 .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Oil Development Activities on Environment and Sustainable Development in Fier Area, Albania
    E-ISSN 2281-4612 Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Vol. 2, No. 9 ISSN 2281-3993 MCSER Publishing-Rome,Italy October 2013 The Impact of Oil Development Activities on Environment and Sustainable Development in Fier Area, Albania Aulent Guri PhD in progress in Economy and Sustainable Development at UET University, Albania, Environmental Expert at Tirana Municipality, Albania. [email protected] Sazan Guri Prof.asc. Lecturer on Environmental Right in Vitrina University, Albania [email protected] Armend Aliu PhD in progress in Finance, Lecturer at University of Prishtina – Kosovo, Faculty of Economy. [email protected] Otjela Lubonja PhD in progress in Economy and Sustainable Development, Lecturer at Vitrina University, Faculty of Architecture, Tirana Albania. [email protected] Doi:10.5901/ajis.2013.v2n9p626 Abstract In this area, a dynamic technological activity is still exerted, which arrived to evidently influence in around environment with their wastes, making so a dangerous risk for human health and natural. That’s why; this region is classified by the UNDP among the nine hot spots in Albania. The selected surface for study is around 200km2. The oil and gas field of Fier area is considered as one of the less managed zones, because of absence and damages in land, water and air, where the throwing of the oil waste in surface has not permitted the development of pedogenic processes. It has brought the deficit of soil, and consequently the right agrarian cultivation has not been permitted. The light hydrocarbons, which disturbed the two cities, introduce toxic indications in concentration of 3-5mg/l. Among the main problems are the stream waters that have in their composition oil components, such as phenol, different hydrocarbons, tension-active matters, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • ITF Enhancing Human Security Annual Report 2014
    James Madison University JMU Scholarly Commons Center for International Stabilization and Global CWD Repository Recovery 2014 ITF Enhancing Human Security Annual Report 2014 ITF Enhancing Human Security ITF Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/cisr-globalcwd Part of the Defense and Security Studies Commons, Peace and Conflict Studies Commons, Public Policy Commons, and the Social Policy Commons Recommended Citation Human Security, ITF Enhancing, "ITF Enhancing Human Security Annual Report 2014" (2014). Global CWD Repository. 1475. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/cisr-globalcwd/1475 This Other is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for International Stabilization and Recovery at JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Global CWD Repository by an authorized administrator of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. // ANNUALREPORT 2014 CONTENTS // INTRODUCTION 5 VISION 8 MISSION 8 PRINCIPLES 9 GOALS 11 // ITF MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION 12 ORGANIZATION OF ITF 13 ITF MANAGING BOARD 14 ITF BOARD OF ADVISORS 16 RELATIONSHIPS WITH STAKEHOLDERS 17 A // BENEFICIARY COUNTRIES 17 B // DONOR COMMUNITY 18 C // PARTNERS AND IMPLEMENTING AGENCIES 18 D // HUMAN SECURITY ENVIRONMENT 19 E // ITF EMPLOYEES 19 // MANAGEMENT OF ITF FUNDS 20 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND INTERNAL CONTROL 21 EXTERNAL AUDIT 21 DONATIONS IN 2014 21 A // DONOR REPORT 2014 22 ALLOCATION OF DONATIONS IN 2014 26 1.A // StrAtegic GOAL 1 by countries in 2014 27 1.B // StrAtegic GOAL 1 by purpose
    [Show full text]
  • Albgaz Company
    REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA Energy Regulator Authority Board _______________________________________________________ DECISION No 179 of Date 08.11.2017 ON THE CERTIFICATION OF THE “COMBINED OPERATOR OF NATURAL GAS ” ALBGAZ COMPANY Based on articles 37, 50, 59, 68, and 80 of Law no. 102/2015, “On Natural Gas Sector”, the Ministerial Council decision no. D/2011/02/MC-EnC, Energy Community Treaty, ratified with Law no. 9501, of date 03.04.2006, as well as articles 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 of the rules “On the certification of the Combined Operator for natural gas ”, approved with decision no. 100, of date 05.08.2015 and amended with decision no. 129, of date 31.10.2015, and article 15, of the regulation “On ERE organisation, operation and procedures”, and then being informed with the report prepared by the Technical Directories regarding the certification of the “Natural Gas Combined Operator” Albgaz sh.a that in this decision we will refer as transmission system operator (TSO), Considering that: - Law no. 102/2015 “On Natural Gas Sector” is fully aligned with Directive 2009/73/EC, of the European Parliament and of the Council, of date 13 July 2009, “Concerning the common rules for the internal market of natural gas”, including the requests provided for the certification of transmission system operators; - Based on article 80, of Law no. 102/2015, “On Natural Gas Sector”, the Combined Operator exercise its own activity independent of Oil and Gas Sectors namely generarion, trading and natural gas supply, in conformity woth the principles and requirements prescribed in this law. - Also on articles 37, 50, 59, 68, and 80, of Law no.
    [Show full text]
  • Baseline Study: Socio-Economic Situation And
    Program funded by Counselling Line for Women and Girls This report was developed by the Counseling Line for Women and Girls with the support of Hedayah and the European Union, as part of an initiative to preventing and countering violent extremism and radicalization leading to terrorism in Albania. BASELINE REPORT Socio-economic Situation and Perceptions of Violent Extremism and Radicalization in the Municipalities of Pogradec, Bulqizë, Devoll, and Librazhd Baseline Report Socio-economic Situation and Perceptions of Violent Extremism and Radicalization in the Municipalities of Pogradec, Bulqizë, Devoll, and Librazhd Tirana, 2020 This report was developed by the Counseling Line for Women and Girls with the support of Hedayah and the European Union, as part of an initiative to preventing and countering violent extremism and radicalization leading to terrorism in Albania. 1 Index Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 4 Key findings ................................................................................................................................................... 5 Municipality of Pogradec .............................................................................................................................. 6 Socio-economic profile of the municipality .............................................................................................. 6 Demographics ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • In This Issue
    Newsletter, Spring 2016 Project funded by the European Union Protecting Lake Ohrid TOWARDS STRENGTHENED GOVERNANCE OF THE SHARED TRANSBOUNDARY NATURAL AND CULTURAL HERITAGE OF THE LAKE OHRID REGION Photo: Ardian Fezollari Photo: Ardian IN THIS ISSUE Dear readers, 1 Foreword by the Albanian It is with great pleasure that I address you through this Minister of Environment (page 1) first newsletter published in the framework of the transboundary project aiming at protection of the natural and cultural heritage of Lake Ohrid region. Management 2 The project in a nutshell (page 2) of this protected area is today the primary focus of the Ministry of Environment, in a challenging time for achieving 3 Key project facts (page 2) tangible results with regards to biodiversity. It requires a process of responsible use of biodiversity hotspots and the protection of species and habitats. Implementation of 4 Project meetings (page 3) this transboundary project will contribute greately to the integrated management of natural and cultural heritage of the region, which is highly important for nature conservation and biodiversity. 5 Interview with the Mayor of Pogradec (page 4) Lake Ohrid Region is a mixed property and protected area included in the cross- border Biosphere Reserve of Albania and Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. This project aims at addressing possible threats to the natural and cultural heritage 6 News related to the Lake of the region. Ohrid Region (page 4) Strengthening of transboundary cooperation to save, protect and promote the values of the region, identifying its universal outstanding values, exploiting opportunities for sustainable development and building capacities for effective and integrated 7 Tourism around Lake Ohrid management of the cultural and natural heritage based on active cross-cutting Region (page5) sectorial cooperation and involvement of the community, are some of the pillars of the project's implementation.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconciliation of Revenues Received by the Municipality of Patos from Royalty Payments and the Administration of Funds for the Benefits of the Community in 2012
    Reconciliation of revenues received by the Municipality of Patos from royalty payments and the administration of funds for the benefits of the community in 2012 Municipality of Patos Albania EITI Secretariat 2015 September 9 Table 1 Comparison between local The Economy government budgetary funds and funds received by Royalty Budget Royalty Table 2 Legislation Local Units beneficiary of Royalty in a. Laws for royalty 2012-2013 b. Guidelines of Ministry of Finance Table 3 Content c. Percentage of the Royalty according to Information and data reported by the classification for Hydro-Carbon Sector Municipality of Patos Executive overview Patos Municipality Contribution of extractive industry to Albania Table 4 Economy Communes near the area Information and data reported by Commune of Mbrostar Contribution of Royalty by extractive areas Geography Demography Control over the use of Royalty funds Culture and Sport _________________________________________ Conclusions Albania EITI Secretariat _________________________________________ Recommendations The accomplishment of this task is carried out ○ The Royalty funds collected and delivered by in accordance with the competences given to the Ministry of Finance have been identified EITI Albania on the collection and processing for the whole country and in particular for of data and official information for Patos Municipality. reconciliation of the income received from royalty fund and the administration of these ○ On-site verification on the administration of royalty funds given to Patos Municipality based funds delivered to Patos Municipality in 2012 on law procedures, rules and the relevant The main objective is the verification of the projects approved to the benefit of the Pursuant to tasks arising from the MSG delivery process of the Royalty funds and the community in the extractive industry areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristics of Children and Parents Interviewed in February 2018
    Acknowledgements Acknowledgements Authors: Joanna Rogers and Elayn M. Sammon Data Collection Team: National coordinator / Blerta Çani Drenofci, National Senior Researcher / Rudina Rama, National Researchers / Florida Kalemi and Narbys Ballhysa, Data Collectors / Ilda Bozo, Juliana Shllaku, Enron Seiti, Mirela Juka, Daklea Kalaja, Sopot Bogdani, Rovena Rojba, Anisa Hysesani, Adriana Sinoruka. Editing: Ian F Wilson Photography: Jutta Benzenberg Graphic Design: REC Design Special thanks to Ms.Oreada Kita, Founder and Director of Jonathan Center Albania, which offers free professional daily services to children, for providing support and access to children’s voices and their images. The authors of the report extend special thanks to the children with disabilities, their families and caregivers who openly shared their views and opinions for this report. The authors are indebted to the representatives of the Government of Albania at national and sub-national levels for their commitment, inputs and support. In particular, the Ministry of Health and Social Protection and Ministry of Education, Sports and Youth provided support and guidance in the design and implementation of the study. Sincere thanks are particularly extended to the collaborating partner the Albanian Disability Rights Foundation (ADRF) for their thorough approach to the primary data collection and overall support throughout the process. Sincere thanks to David Gvineria, Child Protection Specialist, and Elda Hallkaj, Child Rights Monitoring Specialist, for driving the process and for their commitment, consistent and reliable support. The UNICEF Albania team as a whole were particularly helpful in sharing their experience and in diligently supporting this exercise. This publication became possible thanks to the EU funded multi-country project on ‘Protecting children from violence and promoting social inclusion of children with disabilities in Western Balkans and Turkey’.
    [Show full text]
  • The Study for the Master Plan for Promoting the Mining Industry of Albania Final Report
    MINISTRY OF ECONOMY, TRADE AND ENERGY (METE) REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA THE STUDY FOR THE MASTER PLAN FOR PROMOTING THE MINING INDUSTRY OF ALBANIA FINAL REPORT November 2010 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY MITSUBISHI MATERIALS TECHNO CORPORATION KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. IDD JR 10-151 PREFACE In response to a request from the Government of the Republic of Albania, the Government of Japan decided to conduct “The study for the Master Plan for Promoting the Mining Industry in Albania” and entrusted the study to the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). JICA selected and dispatched a study team, headed by Mr. Yoshiaki Shibata of Mitsubishi Materials Techno Corporation, consisting of experts from Mitsubishi Materials Techno Corporation and Kokusai Kogyo Co., Ltd., for six times between a period from May 2009 to November 2010. The study team held discussion with the officials concerned of the Government of the Republic of Albania and conducted field study in Albania. Upon returning to Japan, the team conducted further studies and the final report was completed. I hope that this report will contribute to the promotion of mining development of the Republic of Albania and also to the enhancement of friendly relationship between two countries. Finally, I wish to express my sincere appreciation to the officials concerned of the Government of the Republic of Albania for their close cooperation extended to the study. Ms. Kyoko Kuwajima Director General Industrial Development Department Japan International Cooperation Agency November 2010 November 2010 Ms. Kyoko Kuwajima Director General Industrial Development Department Japan International Cooperation Agency Letter of Transmittal Dear Sir, We are pleased to submit herewith the final report of “The Study of the Mater Plan for Promoting the Mining Industry of Albania”.
    [Show full text]
  • Albania Environmental Performance Reviews
    Albania Environmental Performance Reviews Third Review ECE/CEP/183 UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE REVIEWS ALBANIA Third Review UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2018 Environmental Performance Reviews Series No. 47 NOTE Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. In particular, the boundaries shown on the maps do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. The United Nations issued the second Environmental Performance Review of Albania (Environmental Performance Reviews Series No. 36) in 2012. This volume is issued in English only. Information cut-off date: 16 November 2017. ECE Information Unit Tel.: +41 (0)22 917 44 44 Palais des Nations Fax: +41 (0)22 917 05 05 CH-1211 Geneva 10 Email: [email protected] Switzerland Website: http://www.unece.org ECE/CEP/183 UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No.: E.18.II.E.20 ISBN: 978-92-1-117167-9 eISBN: 978-92-1-045180-2 ISSN 1020–4563 iii Foreword The United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (ECE) Environmental Performance Review (EPR) Programme provides assistance to member States by regularly assessing their environmental performance. Countries then take steps to improve their environmental management, integrate environmental considerations into economic sectors, increase the availability of information to the public and promote information exchange with other countries on policies and experiences.
    [Show full text]
  • Response of the Albanian Government
    CPT/Inf (2006) 25 Response of the Albanian Government to the report of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) on its visit to Albania from 23 May to 3 June 2005 The Albanian Government has requested the publication of this response. The report of the CPT on its May/June 2005 visit to Albania is set out in document CPT/Inf (2006) 24. Strasbourg, 12 July 2006 Response of the Albanian Government to the report of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) on its visit to Albania from 23 May to 3 June 2005 - 5 - REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS Legal Representative Office No.______ Tirana, on 20.03.2006 Subject: The Albanian Authority’s Responses on the Report of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and other Inhuman or Degrading Treatment (CPT) The Committee for the Prevention of Torture and other Inhuman or Degrading Treatment (CPT) Mrs. Silvia CASALE - President Council of Europe - Strasbourg Dear Madam, Referring to your letter date 21 December 2005 in the report of 2005 of CPT for Albania, we inform that our state authorities are thoroughly engaged to realize the demands and recommendations made by the CPT and express their readiness to cooperate for the implementation and to take the concrete measures for the resolution of the evidenced problems in this report. Responding to your request for information as regards to the implementation of the submitted recommendations provided in the paragraphs 68, 70, 98, 131, 156 of the report within three months deadline, we inform that we have taken a response form the Ministry of Justice and the Ministry of Health meanwhile the Ministry of interior will give a response as soon as possible.
    [Show full text]