The Epigeic Spider Fauna of Single-Row Hedges in a Danish Agricultural Landscape

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Epigeic Spider Fauna of Single-Row Hedges in a Danish Agricultural Landscape 237 European Arachnology 2000 (S. Toft & N. Scharff eds.), pp. 237-242. © Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, 2002. ISBN 87 7934 001 6 (Proceedings of the 19th European Colloquium of Arachnology, Århus 17-22 July 2000) The epigeic spider fauna of single-row hedges in a Danish agricultural landscape SØREN TOFT1 & GABOR L. LÖVEI2 1Department of Zoology, University of Aarhus, Building 135, DK-8000 Århus C, Denmark ([email protected]) 2Danish Institute of Agricultural Science, Research Centre Flakkebjerg, Department of Crop Protection, DK-4200 Slagelse, Denmark ([email protected]) Abstract To characterise arthropod biodiversity supported by one type of non-cultivated habitat patches in a cultivated Danish landscape, ground-active arthropods were collected by pitfall traps in three single-row hedgerow types near Bjerringbro, central Jutland, Denmark. Three each of hawthorn (Crategus monogyna), rowan (Sorbus intermedia), or white spruce (Picea glauca) hedgerows were sampled twice yearly, in early (June) and late summer (late August) using 20 pitfall traps per habitat patch (10 in centre, 10 at edge). A total of 71 spider species were identified among 1422 individu- als: 33 species (515 individuals) were found in hawthorn hedges, 52 species (653 individuals) in rowan, and 48 species (254 individuals) in spruce. Principal Component Analysis clearly separated the spider assemblages by tree species of the hedge. There was no difference between edge and central traps neither at the assemblage nor at the species level. Most species captured were char- acteristic of non-cultivated land (Diplostyla concolor, Diplocephalus latifrons, Oxyptila praticola, Zelotes pusillus), or associated with more permanent grassland rather than cultivated crops (Pardosa prati- vaga, Pachygnatha degeeri). Species typical of cultivated agricultural fields were infrequent (Erigone atra, Bathyphantes gracilis, Meioneta rurestris, Oedothorax apicatus) or missing altogether (eg. Araeon- cus humilis). Thus, the narrow single-row hedges were faunistically very little influenced by the cul- tivated matrix habitat enclosing them. Key words: biodiversity, hedgerows, spider assemblages, habitat affinity, rowan, hawthorn, spruce INTRODUCTION a more efficient management of biodiversity as Biodiversity in the agricultural landscape has well as of the ecosystem services they provide traditionally been associated with non- (Daly 1999). The study of predatory arthropods cultivated areas, even though a considerable such as spiders is obviously relevant in this number of species can be found on cultivated respect. land (Meszaros 1984; regarding spiders: Toft Because of methodological differences, 1989; Vangsgaard 1996). With the increasing studies of hedgerow spiders can be grouped human pressure on such habitats, the signifi- into those considering the fauna of higher cance of biodiversity that can be supported by vegetation (see Nährig 1991; Ysnel & Canard agricultural land is bound to increase. Little is 2000), and those considering the ground-active known, however, of the level of biodiversity fauna (Blick 1989; Henatsch & Blick 1993; that can be supported, and how uncultivated Møller-Nielsen 1990; Reinke & Irmler 1994; areas interact with the cultivated land. An im- Bergthaler 1996). Hedgerows obviously add to proved understanding of these is necessary for the biodiversity of the arable landscape 238 European Arachnology 2000 through the shrub and tree living species that Aidt1, Aidt2), three of rowan (Sorbus interme- would otherwise be absent. Hedges also add, dia) (Sahl, Gerning, Aldrup), and three of however, to the fauna of ground-active spiders, spruce (two of white spruce Picea glauca, one of especially woodland species. Earlier studies on sitka spruce Picea sitchensis) (Sahl1, Sahl2, the epigeic fauna indicated that: A) hedgerows Lådnehøje). They were old, well established are inhabited by an assemblage distinct from hedges of the single-row type. The total width those of fields as well as woodlands (Blick was variable as some hedges had a wide grass 1989; Møller-Nielsen 1990; Reinke & Irmler covered base (total hedge width, range of 1994); B) they are often dominated by wood- means at the three locations: hawthorn, 2.4 – land or forest-edge species rather than by field 4.0 m; rowan, 2.6 – 5.0 m; spruce, 3.0 – 3.3 m ). species (Blick 1989); and C) the spider assem- One hedge differed in some of these respects: blages show high species richness because the sitka hedge was planted alternately in two woodland and open-land species mix into a rows, it was rather dense with branches to the composite assemblage. Reinke & Irmler (1994) ground, thus creating a vegetation-free centre. found only one type of hedge with dominance Other peculiarities of single hedges will be of the field species Erigone atra (Bl.): low hedges mentioned along with the results. The nine on sandy soil, poor in ground vegetation. sample locations were at a distance of 200 m – Though some of the hedges studied previously 10 km from each other, within a 4 km x 10 km were quite young, they were composed of at area. Individual hedgerows were sampled least three rows of trees or shrubs and thus of a twice yearly, in early (June 1999) and late sum- considerable width (Blick 1989: 6-8 m; Møller- mer (early September 1999), using 20 pitfalls Nielsen 1990: 4.5 - 5 m; Bergthaler 1996: 3.5 m). per habitat patch. Ten of the traps were set at As soon as the canopy closes, a ‘forest floor’ the edge, and ten in the centre of the hedgerow, habitat is created in the centre of the hedge, the at a distance of 10 m between individual traps. ground being covered by leaf litter rather than Neighbouring traps alternated with respect to grasses or herb vegetation. The spider fauna of position. Edge traps were situated only 10-20 old single-row hedges in which the woodland cm from the adjacent cultivated field. character of the habitat is not obvious, was ex- Individual pitfall traps were plastic cups of pected to be more influenced by influx from 10 cm diameter, filled with about 200 ml of 70% surrounding fields, but has to our knowledge ethylene glycol solution and a drop of deter- not previously been analysed. gent. Traps were sunk into the ground so that We studied the assemblages of ground- their rim was level with the soil surface. Every active spiders in three types of single-row trap was covered with a galvanised metal hedges in central Jutland, Denmark, and from square cover to protect the trap contents from the analysis of one year’s results, we describe a rain and disturbance by frogs, birds or small fairly high degree of species richness. More- mammals. Traps were set for one week at a over, the fauna was not highly influenced by time. Trap catches were sieved in the field and that of the fields. Apart from an unpublished transferred into glass vials containing 70% thesis (Møller-Nielsen 1990) on three 13 year ethyl alcohol. Trap catches with small mam- old 3-rowed hedges, this is the first account of mals or frogs as well as displaced or raised hedgerow spiders in Denmark. traps (33 of a total of 360) were not included in the evaluation. In the laboratory, the samples STUDY AREA AND METHODS were sorted under a microscope, and ground Our study took place in the area of Bjerringbro, beetles and spiders were put into separate vials central Jutland, Denmark. Nine hedgerows and stored in 70% ethyl alcohol until identifica- were selected for study; three of hawthorn tion. (Crategus monogyna) (localities: Lådnehøje, Identification was made by ST. Spider tax- Toft & Lövei: Hedgerow spiders 239 3 Fig. 1. The results of Principal E Component Analysis on un- Låd transformed spider capture C data in nine hedgerows near 2 Bjerringbro, Jutland, Denmark. E: edge traps, C: centre traps. Aidt1, Aidt2, Ald, Ger, Låd, 1 Sahl1, Sahl2 are abbreviations Aidt1 Sahl C Ald for sites (see text). PC2 E C E 0 E C E Ger Aidt2 E E C Låd C C Sahl1 Hedge type -1 E C Sorbus C E Sahl2 Crataegus Picea -2 -2-10123 PC1 1,0 Fig. 2. Habitat affinity relations Dip.con of the 19 most common spider Dip.lat species according to PCA (Cf. Fig. 1.). Lep.ten For abbreviations of species names: see appendix 1. 0,5 Par.pal Eri.atr Par.lug Par.pra PC2 All.sco Rob.liv Alo.pul 0,0 Agy.con Tro.ter Poc.pum Oxy.pra Zel.sub Bat.gra Zel.pus Euo.fro Pac.deg -0,5 01 PC1 onomy follows Platnick (1993). The total (early total of 72 spider species were identified among + late summer) catches of 10 traps (centre or 1563 individuals (Appendix 1). In Sorbus edge) of each hedgerow were summed, giving hedgerows, 722 individuals of 52 species were 18 sites. The species/sites matrix was analysed captured, followed by Crataegus (548 individu- with a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) on als of 33 species). Picea hedgerows had the untransformed numbers using the CANOCO 4 smallest number of individuals (293 spiders) program (ter Braak & Smilauer 1998; cf. Jong- but not the lowest species richness (49 species). man et al. 1987). All species were included in The Principal Component Analysis gave a clear the analysis, but only the more abundant ones separation of hedges according to tree species (≥ 10 individuals) are shown in the species plot. (Fig. 1): Sorbus hedges were distinguished from the other two types along the first axis; RESULTS Crataegus and Picea hedges separated along the In the captures from the nine hedgerows, a second axis. 240 European Arachnology 2000 Fig. 2 shows which species were respons- A study of newly planted hedgerows in Aus- ible for the separations of hedge types: Pardosa tria (Bergthaler 1996), even though longer in prativaga, Trochosa terrestris, and Pocadicnemis duration and collecting more spiders, found pumila were especially abundant in the Sorbus fewer species (44).
Recommended publications
  • Surface-Active Spiders (Araneae) in Ley and Field Margins
    Norw. J. Entomol. 51, 57–66. 2004 Surface-active spiders (Araneae) in ley and field margins Reidun Pommeresche Pommeresche, R. 2004. Surface-active spiders (Araneae) in ley and field margins. Norw. J. Entomol. 51, 57-66. Surface-active spiders were sampled from a ley and two adjacent field margins on a dairy farm in western Norway, using pitfall traps from April to June 2001. Altogether, 1153 specimens, represent- ing 33 species, were found. In total, 10 species were found in the ley, 16 species in the edge of the ley, 22 species in the field margin “ley/forest” and 16 species in the field margin “ley/stream”. Erigone atra, Bathyphantes gracilis, Savignia frontata and Collinsia inerrans were the most abun- dant species in the ley. C. inerrans was not found in the field margins. This species is previously recorded only a few times in Norway. Diplocephalus latifrons, Tapinocyba insecta, Dicymbium tibiale, Bathyphantes nigrinus and Diplostyla concolor were most abundant in the field margin “ley/ forest”. D. latifrons, D. tibiale and Pardosa amentata were most abundant in the field margin “ley/ stream”, followed by E. atra and B. gracilis. The present results were compared to results from ley and pasture on another farm in the region, recorded in 2000. A Detrended Correspondence Analyses (DCA) of the data sets showed that the spider fauna from the leys were more similar, independent of location, than the fauna in ley and field margins on the same locality. The interactions between cultivated fields and field margins according to spider species composition, dominance pattern and habitat preferences are discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • A Summary List of Fossil Spiders
    A summary list of fossil spiders compiled by Jason A. Dunlop (Berlin), David Penney (Manchester) & Denise Jekel (Berlin) Suggested citation: Dunlop, J. A., Penney, D. & Jekel, D. 2010. A summary list of fossil spiders. In Platnick, N. I. (ed.) The world spider catalog, version 10.5. American Museum of Natural History, online at http://research.amnh.org/entomology/spiders/catalog/index.html Last udated: 10.12.2009 INTRODUCTION Fossil spiders have not been fully cataloged since Bonnet’s Bibliographia Araneorum and are not included in the current Catalog. Since Bonnet’s time there has been considerable progress in our understanding of the spider fossil record and numerous new taxa have been described. As part of a larger project to catalog the diversity of fossil arachnids and their relatives, our aim here is to offer a summary list of the known fossil spiders in their current systematic position; as a first step towards the eventual goal of combining fossil and Recent data within a single arachnological resource. To integrate our data as smoothly as possible with standards used for living spiders, our list follows the names and sequence of families adopted in the Catalog. For this reason some of the family groupings proposed in Wunderlich’s (2004, 2008) monographs of amber and copal spiders are not reflected here, and we encourage the reader to consult these studies for details and alternative opinions. Extinct families have been inserted in the position which we hope best reflects their probable affinities. Genus and species names were compiled from established lists and cross-referenced against the primary literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Arachnologische Arachnology
    Arachnologische Gesellschaft E u Arachnology 2015 o 24.-28.8.2015 Brno, p Czech Republic e www.european-arachnology.org a n Arachnologische Mitteilungen Arachnology Letters Heft / Volume 51 Karlsruhe, April 2016 ISSN 1018-4171 (Druck), 2199-7233 (Online) www.AraGes.de/aramit Arachnologische Mitteilungen veröffentlichen Arbeiten zur Faunistik, Ökologie und Taxonomie von Spinnentieren (außer Acari). Publi- ziert werden Artikel in Deutsch oder Englisch nach Begutachtung, online und gedruckt. Mitgliedschaft in der Arachnologischen Gesellschaft beinhaltet den Bezug der Hefte. Autoren zahlen keine Druckgebühren. Inhalte werden unter der freien internationalen Lizenz Creative Commons 4.0 veröffentlicht. Arachnology Logo: P. Jäger, K. Rehbinder Letters Publiziert von / Published by is a peer-reviewed, open-access, online and print, rapidly produced journal focusing on faunistics, ecology Arachnologische and taxonomy of Arachnida (excl. Acari). German and English manuscripts are equally welcome. Members Gesellschaft e.V. of Arachnologische Gesellschaft receive the printed issues. There are no page charges. URL: http://www.AraGes.de Arachnology Letters is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Autorenhinweise / Author guidelines www.AraGes.de/aramit/ Schriftleitung / Editors Theo Blick, Senckenberg Research Institute, Senckenberganlage 25, D-60325 Frankfurt/M. and Callistus, Gemeinschaft für Zoologische & Ökologische Untersuchungen, D-95503 Hummeltal; E-Mail: [email protected], [email protected] Sascha
    [Show full text]
  • 20140620 Thesis Vanklink
    University of Groningen Of dwarves and giants van Klink, Roel IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2014 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): van Klink, R. (2014). Of dwarves and giants: How large herbivores shape arthropod communities on salt marshes. s.n. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 29-09-2021 Of Dwarves and Giants How large herbivores shape arthropod communities on salt marshes Roel van Klink This PhD-project was carried out at the Community and Conservation Ecology group, which is part of the Centre for Ecological and Environmental Studies of the University of Groningen, The Netherlands.
    [Show full text]
  • SRS News 66.Pub
    www.britishspiders.org.uk S.R.S. News. No. 66 In Newsl. Br. arachnol. Soc. 117 Spider Recording Scheme News March 2010, No. 66 Editor: Peter Harvey; [email protected]@britishspiders.org.uk My thanks to those who have contributed to this issue. S.R.S. News No. 67 will be published in July 2010. Please send contributions by the end of May at the latest to Peter Harvey, 32 Lodge Lane, GRAYS, Essex, RM16 2YP; e-mail: [email protected] or [email protected] Editorial Hillyard noted that it had been recorded at Edinburgh. This was not mapped, but probably refers to a record from As usual I am very grateful to all the contributors who have provided articles for this issue. Please keep the Lothian Wildlife Information Centre ‘Secret Garden providing articles. Survey’. The species was found in Haddington, to the Work on a Spider Recording Scheme website was east of Edinburgh and south of the Firth of Forth in delayed by hiccups in the OPAL grant process and the October 1995 (pers. comm. Bob Saville). These records timeslot originally set aside for the work has had to be appear on the National Biodiversity Network Gateway. reorganised. Work should now be completed by the end of D. ramosus is generally synanthropic and is common May this year. in gardens where it can be beaten from hedges and trees, As always many thanks are due to those Area especially conifers. However many peoples’ first Organisers, MapMate users and other recorders who have experience of this species will be of seeing it spread- provided their records to the scheme during 2009 and eagled on a wall (especially if the wall is whitewashed – early this year.
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Invertebrates Colonizing Green Roofs in London
    URBAN HABITATS, VOLUME 4, NUMBER 1 ISSN 1541-7115 Rare Invertebrates Colonizing Green Roofs in London http://www.urbanhabitats.org Rare Invertebrates Colonizing Green Roofs in London by Gyongyver Kadas Royal Holloway University of London, Biological Sciences 4 West Heath Drive, London NW11 7QH U.K. Abstract are often more adventurous with regard to the The biodiversity potential of green roofs in places they colonize and use. Not many people London and their potential role in invertebrate associate rooftops with wildlife habitats, but if conservation and habitat mitigation were studied. suitable niches are available or provided, plants In summer and autumn 2004, I investigated three and animals will rapidly move in and establish different habitat types: green (Sedum) roofs, communities. In some cases, green roofs offer brown/biodiverse roofs, and brownfields. The the only valuable wildlife sanctuaries in our study focused on three diverse invertebrate cities and towns. Of particular importance is the groups: Araneae (spiders), Coleoptera (beetles), fact that these rooftops already exist, so no and aculeate Hymenoptera (wasps, ants, bees). A additional space has to be sacrificed. The high abundance of invertebrates were found on potential to provide habitat for wildlife on green the roofs. At least 10% of species collected at the roofs is tremendous. In London, for instance, study sites were designated nationally rare or 26,000 hectares of available roof space could be scarce, in accordance with criteria established by greened with little effort, and this would create the intergovernmental agency Natural England. 28 times the green space of Great Richmond The data indicates that green and Park (Grant, Engleback & Nicholson, 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • “There Would Doubtless Be a Just Feeling of Pride
    “There would doubtless be a just feeling of pride and satisfaction in the heart of a naturalist who could say that he had made himself thoroughly acquainted with all the species of a particular group of animals, had learned their most secret habits, and mastered their several relations to the objects, animate and inanimate, which surrounded them. But perhaps a still keener pleasure is enjoyed by one who carries about with him some problem of the kind but partially solved, and who, holding in his hand the clue which shall guide him onwards, sees in each new place that he visits fresh opportunities of discovery.” J. Traherne Moggridge Harvesting Ants and Trap-door Spiders, page 180 Saville, Edwards and Co., London 1874 University of Alberta Composition and structure of spider assemblages in layers of the mixedwood boreal forest after variable retention harvest by Jaime H. Pinzón A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Wildlife Ecology and Management Department of Renewable Resources ©Jaime H. Pinzón Fall 2011 Edmonton, Alberta Permission is hereby granted to the University of Alberta Libraries to reproduce single copies of this thesis and to lend or sell such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only. Where the thesis is converted to, or otherwise made available in digital form, the University of Alberta will advise potential users of the thesis of these terms. The author reserves all other publication and other rights in association with the copyright in the thesis and, except as herein before provided, neither the thesis nor any substantial portion thereof may be printed or otherwise reproduced in any material form whatsoever without the author's prior written permission.
    [Show full text]
  • 20 4 319 322 Nekhaeva & Nekhaev.P65
    Arthropoda Selecta 20(4): 319322 © ARTHROPODA SELECTA, 2011 On the spider fauna of Bolshoy Aynov Island (Barents Sea) (Arachnida: Aranei) Ê ôàóíå ïàóêîâ îñòðîâà Áîëüøîé Àéíîâ (Áàðåíöåâî ìîðå) (Arachnida: Aranei) Anna A. Nekhaeva1 & Ivan O. Nekhaev2 À.À. Íåõàåâà1, È.Î. Íåõàåâ2 1 Institute for Problems of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky pr. 33, Moscow 119071 Russia. E-mail: [email protected] Èíñòèòóò ïðîáëåì ýêîëîãèè è ýâîëþöèè ÐÀÍ, Ëåíèíñêèé ïð. 33, Ìîñêâà 119071 Ðîññèÿ. 2 Murmansk Marine Biological Institute, Kola Science Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladimirskaya str. 17, Murmansk 183008 Russia. E-mail: [email protected] Ìóðìàíñêèé ìîðñêîé áèîëîãè÷åñêèé èíñòèòóò ÊÍÖ ÐÀÍ, óë. Âëàäèìèðñêàÿ 17, Ìóðìàíñê 183008 Ðîññèÿ. KEY WORDS: Spiders, Kola Peninsula, tundra, island fauna. ÊËÞ×ÅÂÛÅ ÑËÎÂÀ: Ïàóêè, Êîëüñêèé ïîëóîñòðîâ, òóíäðà, îñòðîâíàÿ ôàóíà. ABSTRACT. An annotated list of 17 spider species part of Barents Sea. The Island is about 2 km long and of 4 families based on personal collecting from Bolshoy represents a flat plain with the extensive boggy depres- Aynov Island (Varangerfjord, Barents Sea) is presented. sion and numerous lakes in its SE part. Savignia frontata Blackwall, 1833 is recorded from The studied area belongs to the Kola subprovince the tundra zone of Kola Peninsula for the first time. of the southern subarctic tundra [Aleksandrova, 1977], which is characterized by poor development of lichen ÐÅÇÞÌÅ. Ïðèâåäåí àííîòèðîâàííûé ñïèñîê ïà- and widespread undershrub communities alternated with óêîâ îñòðîâà Áîëüøîé Àéíîâ (Âàðàíãåð-ôüîðä, Áà- swamps, peatbogs and anthropogenic meadows [Be- ðåíöåâî ìîðå), ñîñòàâëåííûé íà îñíîâå ñîáñòâåí- reslina, 1987]. The island has no permanent human íûõ ñáîðîâ, è âêëþ÷àþùèé 17 âèäîâ èç 4 ñåìåéñòâ.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics and Phenology of Ballooning Spiders in an Agricultural Landscape of Western Switzerland
    Departement of Biology University of Fribourg (Switzerland) Dynamics and phenology of ballooning spiders in an agricultural landscape of Western Switzerland THESIS Presented to the Faculty of Science of the University of Fribourg (Switzerland) in consideration for the award of the academic grade of Doctor rerum naturalium by Gilles Blandenier from Villiers (NE, Switzerland) Dissertation No 1840 UniPrint 2014 Accepted by the Faculty of Science of the Universtiy of Fribourg (Switzerland) upon the recommendation of Prof. Dr. Christian Lexer (University of Fribourg) and Prof. Dr. Søren Toft (University of Aarhus, Denmark), and the President of the Jury Prof. Simon Sprecher (University of Fribourg). Fribourg, 20.05.2014 Thesis supervisor The Dean Prof. Louis-Félix Bersier Prof. Fritz Müller Contents Summary / Résumé ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Chapter 1 General Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Chapter 2 Ballooning of spiders (Araneae) in Switzerland: general results from an eleven-years survey ............................................................................................................................................................................ 11 Chapter 3 Are phenological
    [Show full text]
  • Yorkshire Union Yorkshire Union the Naturalist Vol
    Volume 137 Number 1079 April 2012 Yorkshire Union Yorkshire Union The Naturalist Vol. 137 No. 1079 April 2012 Contents Editorial p1 Dr Roger Key: President of the YNU, 2011-2012 p2 I only wanted to watch the birds John Wint p3 Yorkshire’s Dark Bordered Beauty David Baker p11 On the recent appearance of the Black-bellied Angler in the central North Sea D.E. Whittaker p16 Composition of social groups of Long-finned Pilot Whales which stranded on the Holderness and Lincolnshire coasts in 1982 and 1985 Colin A. Howes p21 Historical notes on the Yorkshire Naturalists’ Union’s first Marine Biology Committee Colin A. Howes p26 Quill mites of the family Syringophilidae parasitic on birds in Yorkshire Barry Nattress p29 A study of the parasitoids of the Horse-chestnut Leaf-miner in a Yorkshire garden Derek Parkinson p34 Greater Wax Moth in Yorkshire* Colin A. Howes p38 Spiders of Rodley Nature Reserve* Richard Wilson p42 A selection of interesting plant galls seen in Yorkshire in 2011 John Newbould p48 Botanical Report for 2011 Phyl Abbott p51 Spider recording in Watsonian Yorkshire during 2011 Richard Wilson p56 Obituaries - Eric Thompson, Donald Henry Smith, Michael J.A. Thompson p67 YNU Excursion Circulars 2012 p72 The Naturalist guide to consistency p77 Calendar of Events 2012 p78 Erratum: p33 Book reviews: p50, 63-65 Letters to the Editors: p15, 60 YNU Notices: p62 An asterisk* indicates a peer-reviewed paper Front cover: Feather mite Analges mucronatus m. Compare this with the quill mites illustrated on p31. Photo: B.Nattress Back cover: Dark-bordered Beauty moths Epione vespertaria (Upper: male, Lower: female).
    [Show full text]
  • Progress in Erigonine Spider Phylogeny—The Savignia-Group Is Not Monophyletic (Araneae: Linyphiidae)
    Org Divers Evol (2010) 10:297–310 Author's personal copy DOI 10.1007/s13127-010-0023-1 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Progress in erigonine spider phylogeny—the Savignia-group is not monophyletic (Araneae: Linyphiidae) Holger Frick & Wolfgang Nentwig & Christian Kropf Received: 1 December 2009 /Accepted: 16 March 2010 /Published online: 11 June 2010 # Gesellschaft für Biologische Systematik 2010 Abstract We present the most inclusive study on the Savignia frontata, and two representatives each of Erigonella, higher-level phylogeny of erigonine spiders, including Dicymbium and Araeoncus combine to form a monophyletic about 30% of all erigonine genera. By expanding the clade. previously most comprehensive analysis (Miller and Hormiga Cladistics 20:385–442, 2004) we tested the robustness of its Keywords Phylogeny. Morphology . Complex genital results to the addition of closely related taxa, and also the organs . Dwarf spiders . Erigoninae monophyly of the Savignia-group defined by Millidge (Bulletin of the British Arachnological Society 4:1–60, 1977). The character matrix was expanded by adding 18 Introduction newly scored species in 15 genera, and also includes all species scored by other authors. This adds up to 98 species Linyphiidae are the second most diverse spider family in in 91 erigonine genera plus 13 outgroup taxa. The the world and the most diverse in the northern hemisphere, parsimony analysis led to eight fully resolved most including 4359 species in 576 genera (Platnick 2010). The parsimonious trees (L=1084). The topology concerning systematics of Linyphiidae struggles with a tremendous the taxa basal to the ‘distal erigonines’ remained amount of genera with ambiguous genus delimitations. A unchanged, and the latter clade still shares 67% of all morphological phylogeny at genus level is therefore nodes with the original analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Spider Diversity in Two Temperate Forests - 693
    Kostanjšek et al.: Comparison of spider diversity in two temperate forests - 693 - COMPARISON OF SPIDER DIVERSITY IN TWO TEMPERATE FORESTS BY A RAPID SURVEY AND ITS POTENTIAL IN NATURE CONSERVATION STUDIES KOSTANJŠEK, R.* – KURALT, Ž. – SIVEC, N. – VELKAVRH, M. University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty, Department of Biology, Večna pot 111, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia (phone: +3861-320-33-73; fax: +3861-257-33-90) *Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected] (Received 31st Oct 2014; accepted 1st Dec 2014) Abstract. One of the crucial issues in nature conservation studies refers to the significant investment of time and energy required for a reliable estimation of biodiversity. To overcome this problem we designed a short survey for the estimation the richness of spider species in comparable habitats based on a semi- quantitative approach. Carrying out the survey in protected and unprotected temperate forest in the north- east Slovenia provided sufficient data for evaluation and relative comparison of spider diversity between the forests. High diversity of spiders observed in both forests indicates their importance as refuge habitats in agriculturally degraded landscape. At the same time, the comparison between surveyed forests shows a significantly higher level of spider diversity in the protected one, which supports the current conservation acts and provides a base-line for future monitoring of spider diversity in the forest. Modified set of sampling methods used in the survey revealed high level of efficiency in sampling by hand-held suction device and suggests its potential as an additional method in spider diversity studies in temperate forests with dense undergrowth.
    [Show full text]