Brochure Is Not Legally Binding
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Middlesex University Research Repository an Open Access Repository Of
Middlesex University Research Repository An open access repository of Middlesex University research http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk Read, Simon ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2380-5130 (2017) Cinderella River: The evolving narrative of the River Lee. http://hydrocitizenship.com, London, pp. 1-163. [Book] Published version (with publisher’s formatting) This version is available at: https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/23299/ Copyright: Middlesex University Research Repository makes the University’s research available electronically. Copyright and moral rights to this work are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners unless otherwise stated. The work is supplied on the understanding that any use for commercial gain is strictly forbidden. A copy may be downloaded for personal, non-commercial, research or study without prior permission and without charge. Works, including theses and research projects, may not be reproduced in any format or medium, or extensive quotations taken from them, or their content changed in any way, without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). They may not be sold or exploited commercially in any format or medium without the prior written permission of the copyright holder(s). Full bibliographic details must be given when referring to, or quoting from full items including the author’s name, the title of the work, publication details where relevant (place, publisher, date), pag- ination, and for theses or dissertations the awarding institution, the degree type awarded, and the date of the award. If you believe that any material held in the repository infringes copyright law, please contact the Repository Team at Middlesex University via the following email address: [email protected] The item will be removed from the repository while any claim is being investigated. -
Waterway Dimensions
Generated by waterscape.com Dimension Data The data published in this documentis British Waterways’ estimate of the dimensions of our waterways based upon local knowledge and expertise. Whilst British Waterways anticipates that this data is reasonably accurate, we cannot guarantee its precision. Therefore, this data should only be used as a helpful guide and you should always use your own judgement taking into account local circumstances at any particular time. Aire & Calder Navigation Goole to Leeds Lock tail - Bulholme Lock Length Beam Draught Headroom - 6.3m 2.74m - - 20.67ft 8.99ft - Castleford Lock is limiting due to the curvature of the lock chamber. Goole to Leeds Lock tail - Castleford Lock Length Beam Draught Headroom 61m - - - 200.13ft - - - Heck Road Bridge is now lower than Stubbs Bridge (investigations underway), which was previously limiting. A height of 3.6m at Heck should be seen as maximum at the crown during normal water level. Goole to Leeds Lock tail - Heck Road Bridge Length Beam Draught Headroom - - - 3.71m - - - 12.17ft - 1 - Generated by waterscape.com Leeds Lock tail to River Lock tail - Leeds Lock Length Beam Draught Headroom - 5.5m 2.68m - - 18.04ft 8.79ft - Pleasure craft dimensions showing small lock being limiting unless by prior arrangement to access full lock giving an extra 43m. Leeds Lock tail to River Lock tail - Crown Point Bridge Length Beam Draught Headroom - - - 3.62m - - - 11.88ft Crown Point Bridge at summer levels Wakefield Branch - Broadreach Lock Length Beam Draught Headroom - 5.55m 2.7m - - 18.21ft 8.86ft - Pleasure craft dimensions showing small lock being limiting unless by prior arrangement to access full lock giving an extra 43m. -
LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 1 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD
LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 1 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD ACC/2423 Reference Description Dates LEE CONSERVANCY BOARD ENGINEER'S OFFICE Engineers' reports and letter books LEE CONSERVANCY BOARD: ENGINEER'S REPORTS ACC/2423/001 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1881 Jan-1883 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/002 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1884 Jan-1886 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/003 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1887 Jan-1889 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/004 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1890 Jan-1893 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/005 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1894 Jan-1896 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/006 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1897 Jan-1899 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/007 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1903 Jan-1903 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/008 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1904 Jan-1904 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/009 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1905 Jan-1905 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/010 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1906 Jan-1906 Lea navigation Dec 1 volume LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 2 BRITISH WATERWAYS BOARD ACC/2423 Reference Description Dates ACC/2423/011 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1908 Jan-1908 Lea navigation/ stort navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/012 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1912 Jan-1912 Lea navigation/ stort navigation Dec 1 volume ACC/2423/013 Reports on navigation - signed copies 1913 Jan-1913 Lea navigation/ stort navigation -
Alexandra Palace to Tottenham Hale Walk
Saturday Walkers Club www.walkingclub.org.uk Alexandra Palace to Tottenham Hale walk Alexandra Palace, the Parkland Walk (a former railway line), two restored Wetlands and several cafés in north London Length Main Walk: 15¾ km (9.8 miles). Three hours 45 minutes walking time. For the whole excursion including trains, sights and meals, allow at least 7 hours. Short Walk 1, from Highgate: 11½ km (7.1 miles). Two hours 35 minutes walking time. Short Walk 2, to Manor House: 11½ km (7.1 miles). Two hours 45 minutes walking time. OS Map Explorer 173. Alexandra Palace is in north London, 10 km N of Westminster. Toughness 3 out of 10 (2 for the short walks from Alexandra Palace, 1 for the others). Features This walk is essentially a merger of two short walks. The first part is the popular Parkland Walk, a linear nature reserve created along the trackbed of a disused railway line. The second part links two new nature reserves created from operational Thames Water reservoirs, using a waymarked cycle/pedestrian route along residential streets. The walk starts with a short climb through Alexandra Park to Alexandra Palace, with splendid views of the London skyline from its terrace. This entertainment venue was intended as the north London counterpart to the Crystal Palace and although it was destroyed by fire just two weeks after opening in 1873 it was promptly rebuilt. Its private owners tried to sell the site and parkland for development in 1900 but it was acquired by a group of local authorities for the benefit of the public. -
Looking Forward to the Next Ten Years
Looking forward to the next ten years London Waterway Partnership Ten Year Strategic Plan 2014 1 Welcome I am delighted to present the London Waterway Partnership’s Strategic Plan. Preparation of the plan has taken a good deal of the Partnership’s early effort, but we have been much helped by the reception and comments arising from our draft document and the two consultation meetings held in December 2013. We are also grateful for the written comments received from the Heritage Lottery Fund; the Hillingdon Canal Partnership; London Boaters and Mark Walton, the River Lee Tidal Mill Trust and Westminster City Council. The document has been strengthened by the valuable points made by our respondents, particularly in emphasising the way in which London waterways can enrich regeneration opportunities and support education, training and volunteering. Our strategy is not set in stone. It is designed to develop over time with the continuing input from those supporting our waterways. We will report progress at our Annual Meeting. Our aspirations are ambitious and how quickly the objectives are met, will depend on the resources available in terms of money and support from within the Canal & River Trust and externally. What is not in question is our conviction that the regional and local elements of the Trust’s overall strategy should be emphasised. We set up the Partnership Board of 12 members in July 2013 and deliberately chose to make the board as diverse as possible in order to reflect the very wide range of interests in canals and waterways. I have been impressed by the Board’s commitment and enthusiasm, characteristics which have been reflected in the many people we have met in getting to know the key elements of London’s very diverse waterways. -
Cinderella River © Simon Read 2017
Cinderella River © Simon Read 2017 Editor: Penny Rogers (SfEP) Publication commissioned by through the Arts & Humanities Research Council Connected Communities programme All images by Simon Read unless otherwise credited Printed by CDS (Corporate Document Services) Design and layout by U2R Design October 2017 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No paragraph of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (as amended) Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. 1 2 Simon Read Simon Read is a visual artist and Associate Professor of Fine Art at Middlesex University London. As someone who has an intimate understanding of coastal dynamics, he has used his position as a senior academic to foster discussion on an interdisciplinary and international basis over the vital importance of understanding the cultural implications of environmental change. Aside from the study that generated this publication, he is actively engaged at a community level in Suffolk with estuary management schemes. Ongoing and recent research projects include CoastWEB, funded by the Natural Environment Research Council and led by Plymouth Marine Laboratory, to use locations on the Welsh coast in a study of the community benefits of a healthy intertidal saltmarsh environment. His studio work has been exhibited widely both in the UK and abroad and is held in several major national and international collections. He has carried out several public commissions, including “A Profile of the River Thames, from Thames Head to Sea Reach” for the Thames Flood Barrier (1996) and “Memory and the Tideline” for the flood defence works on Poole Town Quay (2001). -
Water Quality Analysis of the River Lee and Major Tributaries Within the Perimeter of the M25, from Waltham Abbey to Bow Locks
A water quality analysis of the River Lee and major tributaries within the perimeter of the M25, from Waltham Abbey to Bow Locks. Client: Thames21 Consultant: Grieg R Davies Water sampling and analyses dates: 22 November – 04 December 2011 Date issued: 13 December 2011 Executive summary This report was commissioned to assess the biological, physical and chemical water quality of the London River Lee and its main tributaries within the M25 perimeter, from the M25 near Waltham Abbey to Bow Locks in Bow, London. A pilot water quality investigation was developed to assess 38 sites within seven watercourses, including the London River Lee. Common physical and chemical water quality parameters were measured in the field and analysed by means of representative samples in a laboratory. Samples and measurements were taken during a period of ‘reference’ water levels within the watercourses. Results were compared and analysed against existing water quality classifications from the EU Water Framework Directive amongst others. The investigation determined that the overall water quality within the London River Lee and its tributaries is very poor. Excessive concentrations of reactive phosphate (orthophosphate) in combination with low saturation of dissolved oxygen were common place within many of the sampled sites, as well as high counts of total coliforms and the presence of considerable levels of faecal coliforms. Values for chemical oxygen demand were also found to be excessively high within the majority of sample sites. A simple water quality index determined that the most deteriorated watercourse in the investigation was Stonebridge Brook, while the most deteriorated sample sites were located on the Pymmes Brook and Salmons Brook. -
Tottenham Hale to Lea Bridge) Ferry Lane
Lea Valley Walk Directions: From Tottenham Hale Station turn left out of the station onto Section 3 (Tottenham Hale to Lea Bridge) Ferry Lane. Continue up the hill and straight on. Cross Mill Mead Road to the Lea Valley Walk sign. At Tottenham Lock turn right down the slope to Version 1 : June 2010 start on the towpath of the Lee Navigation. Note that the ramp is cobbled so might not be accessible to all. Continue south, passing under the first of two railway lines, where the Navigation joins the River Lea again. Just after passing under the second railway bridge the Walk passes the Markfield recreation ground. Enter the Start: A503 Ferry Lane (TQ347894) park to find the Markfield Beam Engine. A Station: Tottenham Hale This remarkable engine was built by Wood Brothers, of Sowerby Bridge, Finish: Towpath at end of Southwold Road / Yorkshire, and was commissioned on the 12th July 1888. The engine can North Mill Fields (TQ354867) be viewed on the second Sunday of the month, from March to November. Station: Clapton Return to the towpath keeping the river on the left, you pass the last great Distance: 2 miles (3.2 km) reservoir (Warwick West), and come next to Springfield Park and Marina. Introduction: Section 3 starts at Tottenham Hale and finishes at Lea Springfield Park was created in 1905 from the grounds of three 19th century Bridge, a distance of two miles or you can continue on Section 4 to Bromley houses. The climb to the top of the hill, created by deposits from the Ice by Bow. -
River Lee Floods
El A- Box ^ 1947 RIVER LEE FLOODS YEARS50 ON River Lee Catchment Area Showing Land Liable To Flood (based on extent of 1947 flooding) River Lee Catchment Area Chingford River Thames 8B& S3B Land Liable to Flood Main Rivers Stratford Hackney River Lee Navigation Hertford Union C aul Central London River Lee Flood Relief Channel Thames Barrier Urban area Major roads Minor roads 5 Km £ £A - f (.eo^L I w X CONTENTS page Introduction 1 The Nature of Flooding 1 ® L Responsibility for Managing Flood Protection in the Lee Valley The 1947 Flood Damage Caused by th e Flood r - Transport, Communications and Services 3 - Property 3 Flood Protection Measures - Prior to the 1947 Flood 3 Fig 1 Proposed river improvements in Stratford (1930) 4 Flood Protection Measures - Following the 1947 Flood 5 / 6 / 7 Table 1 Flow Control Structures on the River Lee Flood R elief Channel The Future of Flood Defence in the Lee Valley Appendix I Damage to Property from the 1947 Flood Appendix II References and Acknowledgments 10 Appendix III Working diagrams of: Labyrinth/Folded Weirs 11 Vertical Lift Gates 12 Radial Gates 13 Siphon Spillways 14 Map 1 The River Lee Catchment Area (including the Area Liable to Flood) Inside front cover Map 2 The River Lee Flood R elief Channel (including the location of flow control structures) Inside back cover Front cover River Lee flooding effecting Lee Bridge Rd. ENVIRONMENT AGENCY Note: Not all photographs in this document are of the 1947 flood, however, pictures are indicative of that event. Environment Agency 1947 River Lee Floods - SO Years On 1 INTRODUCTION 3 RESPONSIBILITY FOR FLOOD PROTECTION IN THE LEE VALLEY 1997 marks the 50th anniversary of one of the River Lee’s most damaging floods. -
Attach Signage to Totem
Canal/River Location Standard Description of standard Description Programmed works Lock ladders must extend 900mm below water level or to the lock invert level where Leeds & Liverpool Canal Lock 49, Barrowford Road Locks 2.d.1.a this cannot be achieved. STPO o/s ladder fails CRT standard In project program Lock ladders must extend 900mm below water level or to the lock invert level where Leeds & Liverpool Canal Lock 45, Top Lock Locks 2.d.1.a this cannot be achieved. o/s ladder fails CRT standard Lock ladders must extend 900mm below water level or to the lock invert level where Leeds & Liverpool Canal Lock 46, Lock 2 Locks 2.d.1.a this cannot be achieved. STPO Tps lock ladder fails std In project program Lock ladders must extend 900mm below water level or to the lock invert level where Leeds & Liverpool Canal Lock 47, Car Park Locks 2.d.1.a this cannot be achieved. Tps lock ladder fails CRT standard Lock ladders must extend 900mm below water level or to the lock invert level where Leeds & Liverpool Canal Lock 48, Lock 4 Locks 2.d.1.a this cannot be achieved. STPG o/s Lock ladder fails std In project program Lock ladders must extend 900mm below water level or to the lock invert level where Leeds & Liverpool Canal Lock 51, Bottom Lock Locks 2.d.1.a this cannot be achieved. STPO O/s ladder fails CRT standard In project program Lock ladders must have hoops. Hoops must be a continuation of the stringers of the Leeds & Liverpool Canal Lock 51, Bottom Lock Locks 2.d.1.c ladder.(NEW) STPO Tps ladder fails CRT standard In project program Lock ladders must have sufficient tread depth to allow a secure foothold during use. -
Hale Wharf Tottenham Hale
HALE WHARF TOTTENHAM HALE REVISED DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT Allies and Morrison January 2017 PROJECT TEAM Local Authority: London Borough of Haringey Developer: Muse Devlopments Canal and River Trust Architect: Allies and Morrison Civil, Structural, Geotechnical and Environmental Engineer: Ramboll UK Ltd. Services Engineer and Sustainability Consultant: Hilson Moran Bridge Designers: Witherford Watson Mann Engineers HRW Landscape Architect: Landscape Projects Planning Consultant: Quod Cost Consultant: Core Five LLP Project Manager: Stace LLP Transport Engineer: Odyssey Markides Access Consultant: Centre for Accessible Environments CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 3 DESIGN EVOLUTION AND CONSULTATION 37 1.1 FORM OF THE APPLICATION 1 3.1 EVOLUTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT 37 1.2 PURPOSE OF THE DOCUMENT 3 3.2 BUILDING MASSING STUDIES 41 1.3 DESCRIPTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT 5 3.3 CONSULTATION AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT 45 1.4 DESIGN BRIEF AND OBJECTIVES 7 3.4 SECURE BY DESIGN CONSULTATION 49 1.5 PLANNING POLICY SUMMARY 8 4 OUTLINE ILLUSTRATIVE MASTERPLAN 51 2 SITE CONTEXT AND ANALYSIS 11 4.1 ILLUSTRATIVE MASTERPLAN AND DESIGN CODES 51 2.1 TOTTENHAM HALE (STATEGIC CONTEXT) 11 4.2 BRIDGES 57 2.2 SITE LOCATION AND CONTEXT 13 4.3 USE AND AMOUNT 65 2.3 SITE HISTORY 17 4.4 TYPOLOGY 71 2.4 THE SITE AND ITS USES TODAY 19 4.5 SCALE AND MASSING 75 2.5 CONNECTIVITY 21 4.6 GAPS AND VIEWS THROUGH 93 2.6 LOCAL FACLITIES 23 4.7 APPEARANCE 101 2.7 SITE CONSTRAINTS 27 4.8 TRANSPORT AND PARKING 119 2.8 SITE OPPORTUNITIES 33 4.9 PUBLIC AND PRIVATE REALM 123 4.10 REFUSE AND -
1 Notes of the National Angling Advisory Group Meeting Held On
Notes of the National Angling Advisory Group meeting held on Tuesday 18th June 2013 Canal & River Trust Fazeley Office 1. Attendees Caroline Killeavy (Head of Community Engagement) John Ellis (National Fisheries & Angling Manager) Paul Wilkinson (Ecologist West Midlands) David Kent (Chairman) Eric Bootland (Walton AC) Rod Bracey (Bathampton AA) John Castle (GUSAC) Dave Crookes (Bathampton AA) Peter Fieldhouse (Fenton & DAA) John Johnson (Nottingham AA) Dick Pilkinton (GUSAC) Glyn Williams (Worksop) 2. Apologies for Absence Apologies for absence were received from Roger Hanbury (CRT Head of Governance Services), David Turner (Nottingham AA) and Terry Wright (Kayak Anglers). 3. Notes of previous meeting held on 5th March 2013 and matters arising Apart from a typographical error relating to the date of the previous meeting (now amended) these were accepted as an accurate record of proceedings. Matters arising were as follows: 3.1 Five metre rule Kennet & Avon Canal. Bathampton AA officers were encouraged with progress made by the mooring group looking at long term arrangements for mooring on the western section of the Kennet & Avon. They remain hopeful that the 5 metre gap aspiration where they do not currently exist will continue to be adopted as a firm recommendation by the working group and in due course adopted as Waterway policy CK confirmed that two Boater Liaison Managers had recently been recruited. Both have extensive experience and background in community engagement and conflict resolution. Sorwar Ahmed will be covering the London Waterways and Matthew Symonds covering the south east and south west 1 3.2 Lure Angling Society & Pike Anglers Club. Negotiations with the Pike Anglers Club had reached a positive conclusion and they have now taken control of a 30 mile section of Lancaster canal as and from 1st May 2013.