DOCSLIB.ORG

Natura 2000 Case Study Collection 2007 Justice & Environment Natura 2000 Case Study Collection

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Natura 2000 Case Study Collection 2007 � Justice & Environment Natura 2000 Case Study Collection Natura 2000 Case Study Collection 2007 Justice & Environment Natura 2000 Case Study Collection Contents Contents ...................................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction................................................................................................................................................. 3 Estonia: Ropka Bridge .............................................................................................................................. 9 Czech Republic: R55 motorway(Breclav – Otrokovice) ................................................................ 23 Hungary: Municipal SewageTreatment Plant of Mártély .............................................................. 34 Austria: Lauteracher Ried ...................................................................................................................... 45 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................. 57 Page2 of 57 Justice & Environment Natura 2000 Case Study Collection Introduction Justice& Environment (J&E) is an association of public interest environmental law organizations based in theEU member states. J&E aims to uselaw toprotect people, theenvironment and nature. Our primarygoal is to ensuretheimplementation and enforcement of EU legislation through the useof European law and the exchange of information. Having started its work as informal network in 2003, thefirst full-year work-plan was implemented by J&E in 2006. Implementation and transposition of theHabitats Directive 1 (HD) was chosen byJ&E members as oneof threefirst legal areas tobeworked on. In 2006, J&E carried out an analysis on implementation and transposition of theHD, morespecificallythe implementation and transposition of Articles 6.3 and 6.4 of HD in Estonia, Czech Republic, Hungaryand Slovakia. On the basis of legal analysis on transposition of Article6.3 and 6.4 of HD intonational legislation of thefour EU Member States 2 and thecasestudies that represent typical cases of implementation of Article6.3 and 6.4 of HD in practice 3, J&E issued a position paper. This paper described problems with implementation of HD in new Member States and made suggestions for improvement 4. TheJ&E casestudycollection from 2006 described four cases in separateMember States that weconsidered examples of theincapabilityof new Member States tocomplywith requirements for assessment of plans and programs, according toArticle6(3) and 6(4) of the Habitats Directive. On the basis of thesecasestudies, weisolated common problems in implementing Habitats Directives, despitethefact that thestudies described development projects of different natures (a wind farm in Hungary, a marine port in Estonia, a cableway in Slovakia and a river canal in Czech Republic). Problems detected wereas follows: • Environmental impact assessments of the projects donot takeintoaccount that the projects are tobecarried out on Natura 2000 sites--research concerning values and impacts tothesites has been too limited and shallow. In somecases theinformation about values was provided onlyduring the courseof proceedings for permit. • Although it is clear that theprotected species or habitats will beharmed (in somecases destroyed, e.g. thecaseof Slavik Islands in Czech Republic), permits for the projects was issued bytheauthorities. • In nocases werelocation alternatives considered that might haveresulted in reduced negativeimpact. • In most of thecases nocompensatory measures to ensurethat the overall coherenceof Natura2000 is protected weretaken bytheauthorities, or theoffered measures are obviouslyinsufficient. 1 Council Directive92/43/EEC of 21 May1992 on theconservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora 2 Thelegal analysis is electronicallyavailableat J&E webpage: http://www.justiceandenvironment.org/wp-content/wp-upload/JE2006Naturalegalanalyis.pdf 3 Thecomparativecase studycollection is availableat J&E webpage: http://www.justiceandenvironment.org/wp-content/wp-upload/JE2006Naturacasestudy.pdf 4 Theposition paper is availableat J&E webpage: http://www.justiceandenvironment.org/wp-content/wp-upload/JE2006Naturapositionpaper.pdf Page3 of 57 Justice & Environment Natura 2000 Case Study Collection However, taking intoaccount that all cases (more specifically, administrativeproceedings) wereinitiated beforethe accession dateand theobligation tofollow Articles 6(3) and 6(4) of theHabitats Directivewas questionable(taking intoaccount ECJ interpretation in several cases), thedescribed cases cannot beconsidered direct violations of EU Directives. In 2007, our primarygoal was toascertain whether theviolations of provisions of Habitats Directives in these cases werebecausefulfillment of Articles 6(3) and 6(4) was not obligatory. J&E members found continuing cases of non-fulfillment of therequirements of HD. In order to ascertain thenature and possiblecommon reasons for such violations, wecollected a new set of casestudies. Comparative analysis: Thefollowing cases havebeen selected byJ&E members as representativeexamples of implementation of theHabitats Directive: Case Country Description of theplan Timeline Ropka Bridge Estonia A motorwaybridge over 2005 -… Emajõgi River and Ropka- Ihaste floodplain toconnect both sides of Tartu City R55 motorway Czech HighwayR55 connecting city 1994 -… (Breclav-Otrokovice) Republic agglomeration at south-east of CZcloseto borders with Slovakia Municipal Sewage Hungary Construction of a municipal 2005 -… Treatment Plant of sewagetreatment plant at a Mártély Natura 2000 area Lauteracher Ried Austria Construction of federal S18 1992 -… dual carriageway On the basis of case studies, relevant problems and aspects regarding implementation of Article6(3) and 6(4) of HD arehighlighted and analyzed below. Timing of implementation: Theinitial purpose of thecase studycollection was toanalyzecases initiated after accession totheEU. However, such cases may berarely found among new Member States, especially cases with major impact toNatura sites. There are manyprojects that mayimpact adversely theintegrityof Natura sites, but such projects areonlypart of a decision-making process, initiated before accession. Decision-making may in somepart bepolitical and not administrative. Therefore, a question arises about what should beconsidered as “initiation” or “application for authorization” for such projects, especiallyfor big infrastructureprojects. Page4 of 57 Justice & Environment Natura 2000 Case Study Collection For example, in the Czech case(highwayR55) therelevant land-use plans wereenacted during theyears1994-1998. In the Estonian case, thelocation for a bridgewas included in a comprehensiveplan of Tartu City, enacted after theaccession (2005), but initiated before (2002). At thesametime, theEIA or SEA was, in both Estonian and Czech cases, initiated only for further administrativeproceedings in 2005. Is the Habitats Directive then applicable? TheAustrian casestudy in this collection reflects an ECJ judgment in caseC-209/04 (Lauteracher Ried) which illustrates fundamental positions about timing of theapplication of theHabitats Directive. ECJ refers toearlier judgments about thetiming of theapplication of EIA Directive85/337/EEC. ECJ claims theprinciple (that projects likelytohavesignificant effects on the environmental must be subjected toan environmental assessment) does not apply where the application for authorization for a project was formally lodged before the expiry of the time-limit for transposition of a directive . However, in thecaseC-209/04, Advocate General Kokott pointed out several significant differences between Habitats Directiveand EIA Directive(theformer laying out substantive requirements regarding approval of a project, whilethelatter onlycontains procedural provisions). It sets nobinding environmental standards, so it does not obligethecompetent authorities todraw particular conclusions from thefindings of theenvironmental impact assessment. Wetook intoaccount thefact that land-useplans donot giveauthorization for a project, but createmerepossibilityfor a project tobecarried out in a certain area. Therefore, it must be concluded in all cases analyzed in present collection, HD was applicable. Weexcept the Austrian case (as stated byECJ) which serves as good exampleof problems with the timing of application of HD. Appropriate assessment: According to Article6(3) of HD, any plan or project not directly connected with or necessary to the management of the site but likely to have a significant effect thereon, either individually or in combination with other plans or projects, shall be subject to appropriate assessment of its implications for the site in view of the site’s conservation objectives . Thecases in question concern different plans and projects, although theissueis in general road-building in theCzech, Austrian and Estonian cases. However, in all cases theplans or projects are undoubtedly“plans or projects” in themeaning of Article6(3) of HD. Furthermore, in all cases, theplan or project will be carried out in or near to Natura sites (SPA in all cases, pSCI in Estonian and Hungarian case). It is alsoobvious that theplans or projects in question mayhavesignificant effect upon the Natura sites in question. According to theECJ decision in “Waddenzee” case 5; triggering of the environmental protection mechanism provided for in Article 6(3) of HD does not presume
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Soviet Housing Construction in Tartu: the Era of Mass Construction (1960 - 1991)
    University of Tartu Faculty of Science and Technology Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences Department of Geography Master thesis in human geography Soviet Housing Construction in Tartu: The Era of Mass Construction (1960 - 1991) Sille Sommer Supervisors: Michael Gentile, PhD Kadri Leetmaa, PhD Kaitsmisele lubatud: Juhendaja: /allkiri, kuupäev/ Juhendaja: /allkiri, kuupäev/ Osakonna juhataja: /allkiri, kuupäev/ Tartu 2012 Contents Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Literature review ................................................................................................................................. 5 Housing development in the socialist states .................................................................................... 5 From World War I until the 1950s .............................................................................................. 5 From the 1950s until the collapse of the Soviet Union ............................................................... 6 Socio-economic differentiations in the socialist residential areas ................................................... 8 Different types of housing ......................................................................................................... 11 The housing estates in the socialist city .................................................................................... 13 Industrial control and priority sectors ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tartu Linna Säästva Elamumajanduse Ja Energeetika Programm
    TARTU REGIOONI ENERGIAAGENTUUR Tartu linna Säästva Elamumajanduse ja Energeetika Programm Tellija:Tartu Linnavarade Osakond Direktor: Marek Muiste Koostas: Kalle Virkus Sustainable Energy and Dwelling Management Program (SEDMP) Deliverable nr. 4.6 TARTU 2011 Säästva Elamumajanduse ja Energeetika Programm Tartu Regiooni Energiaagentuur SISU Summary in english .................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Sissejuhatus .................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Kokkuvõte ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Kehtivad teised arengukavad ja direktiivid ................................................................................................................. 5 Hoonete energiatõhususe direktiiv 92/2002 ja selle muutused – Vajadus hakata arvestama „madala energiavajaduse“ nõudmistega hoonete renoveerimisel .................................................................................. 5 Euroopa Energiasäästu Roheline Raamat ja üldine energiasäästupoliitika .............................................. 6 Eesti Eluasemevaldkonna arengukava 2009-2013.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Urbanism and Green Infrastructure. 2019.Pdf
    Landscape Urbanism and Green Infrastructure Edited by Thomas Panagopoulos Printed Edition of the Special Issue Published in Land www.mdpi.com/journal/land Landscape Urbanism and Green Infrastructure Landscape Urbanism and Green Infrastructure Special Issue Editor Thomas Panagopoulos MDPI • Basel • Beijing • Wuhan • Barcelona • Belgrade Special Issue Editor Thomas Panagopoulos University of Algarve Portugal Editorial Office MDPI St. Alban-Anlage 66 4052 Basel, Switzerland This is a reprint of articles from the Special Issue published online in the open access journal Land (ISSN 2073-445X) from 2018 to 2019 (available at: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/land/special issues/greeninfrastructure) For citation purposes, cite each article independently as indicated on the article page online and as indicated below: LastName, A.A.; LastName, B.B.; LastName, C.C. Article Title. Journal Name Year, Article Number, Page Range. ISBN 978-3-03921-369-6 (Pbk) ISBN 978-3-03921-370-2 (PDF) Cover image courtesy of Thomas Panagopoulos. c 2019 by the authors. Articles in this book are Open Access and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which allows users to download, copy and build upon published articles, as long as the author and publisher are properly credited, which ensures maximum dissemination and a wider impact of our publications. The book as a whole is distributed by MDPI under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND. Contents About the Special Issue Editor ...................................... vii Thomas Panagopoulos Special Issue: Landscape Urbanism and Green Infrastructure Reprinted from: Land 2019, 8, 112, doi:10.3390/land8070112 ...................... 1 Jon Bryan Burley The Emergence of Landscape Urbanism: A Chronological Criticism Essay Reprinted from: Land 2018, 7, 147, doi:10.3390/land7040147 .....................
    [Show full text]
  • Lühiülevaade Tartu 2000
    TARTU LINNAVALITSUS LÜHIÜLEVAADE TARTU 2000 TARTU 2001 0 SISUKORD EESSÕNA .............................................................................................................................. 2 ASEND JA KESKKOND ......................................................................................................... 3 MAAKASUTUS ..................................................................................................................... 12 LINNAEHITUSLIKUD TOIMINGUD ........................................................................................ 16 RAHVASTIK......................................................................................................................... 17 ETTEVÕTLUS ...................................................................................................................... 23 TÖÖTURG............................................................................................................................ 28 HARIDUS ............................................................................................................................. 30 ARSTIABI KORRALDUS ...................................................................................................... 38 HOOLEKANNE..................................................................................................................... 42 KULTUUR ............................................................................................................................ 45 KODANIKUKAITSE.............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Network Connections and Neighbourhood Perception
    Architecture and Urban Planning doi: 10.1515/aup-2017-0010 2017 / 13 Network Connections and Neighbourhood Perception: Using Social Media Postings to Capture Attitudes among Twitter Users in Estonia Daniel Baldwin Hess, University at Buffalo, State University of New York Evan Iacobucci, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Annika Väiko, University of Tartu Abstract ‒ The residential landscape of a city is key to its economic, so- control [5] and, with increasing wealth, those who can afford to cial, and cultural functioning. Following the collapse of communist rule in do so often seek alternatives to apartment blocks developed under the countries of Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) in the late 1980s and state socialism [6], [7]. For the first time in more than a half cen- early 1990s, urban residential dynamics and household mobility have been critical to urban change under new economies and political systems. This tury, consumer choice is a key dimension of the housing market article explores neighbourhood perception, which is a link in the chain to (in the Soviet Union, housing was allocated and administratively better explanation of socio-spatial processes (and their interruption by assigned) and people may now freely express their preferences the socialist system). We use a novel data set ‒ opinions expressed on one in housing type and housing location. Consequently, views and of social media (Twitter), and a novel empirical method ‒ neural network analysis, to explore people’s current attitudes and perceptions about the perceptions about apartment buildings, neighbourhoods, and neighbourhoods and districts in Tartu, Estonia. The findings suggest that districts play a role in shaping the attractiveness of places across Twitter comments about urban neighbourhoods display attitudinal and metropolitan space [8].
    [Show full text]
  • Tartu Linna Ühisveevärgi Ja -Kanalisatsiooni Arendamise Kava Aastateks 2012-2025
    Tartu Linnavolikogu Tartu Linnavalitsus TARTU LINNA ÜHISVEEVÄRGI JA -KANALISATSIOONI ARENDAMISE KAVA AASTATEKS 2012-2025 Tartu 2012 Tartu linna ühisveevärgi ja -kanalisatsiooni arendamise kava 2012-2025 SISUKORD Sissejuhatus..............................................................................................4 Kasutatavad mõisted..................................................................................6 1. Tartu linna veemajanduse üldkirjeldus.......................................................8 1.1 Ühisveevärgi ja -kanalisatsiooniga kaetud ala looduslike tingimuste lühiiseloomustus....................................................................................8 1.2 Ühisveevärgi ja -kanalisatsiooni ala seosed Peipsi alamvesikonna veemajanduskava põhiseisukohtadega ja keskkonnakasutust reguleerivate dokumentidega......................................................................................9 1.3 Tartu arengu tulevikuväljavaated ja selle mõju ühisveevärgi ja - kanalisatsiooni arendamisele.................................................................12 2. Tartu linna vee-ettevõtja. Teetähised, kliendid, teenused ja areng...............22 2.1 Vee-ettevõtja AS Tartu Veevärk........................................................22 2.2 ASi Tartu Veevärk olulised teetähised.................................................23 2.3 ASi Tartu Veevärk kliendid................................................................25 2.4 ASi Tartu Veevärk teenused ja nende kasutamine................................26 2.5 ASi
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Energy Planning in Tartu [PLEEC Report D4.2 / Tartu] Große, Juliane; Groth, Niels Boje; Fertner, Christian; Tamm, Jaanus; Alev, Kaspar
    Urban energy planning in Tartu [PLEEC Report D4.2 / Tartu] Große, Juliane; Groth, Niels Boje; Fertner, Christian; Tamm, Jaanus; Alev, Kaspar Publication date: 2015 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Citation for published version (APA): Große, J., Groth, N. B., Fertner, C., Tamm, J., & Alev, K. (2015). Urban energy planning in Tartu: [PLEEC Report D4.2 / Tartu]. EU-FP7 project PLEEC. http://pleecproject.eu/results/documents/viewdownload/131-work- package-4/579-d4-2-urban-energy-planning-in-tartu.html Download date: 29. Sep. 2021 Deliverable 4.2 / Tartu Urban energy planning in Tartu 20 January 2015 Juliane Große (UCPH) Niels Boje Groth (UCPH) Christian Fertner (UCPH) Jaanus Tamm (City of Tartu) Kaspar Alev (City of Tartu) Abstract Main aim of report The purpose of Deliverable 4.2 is to give an overview of urban en‐ ergy planning in the 6 PLEEC partner cities. The 6 reports il‐ lustrate how cities deal with dif‐ ferent challenges of the urban energy transformation from a structural perspective including issues of urban governance and spatial planning. The 6 reports will provide input for the follow‐ WP4 location in PLEEC project ing cross‐thematic report (D4.3). Target group The main addressee is the WP4‐team (universities and cities) who will work on the cross‐ thematic report (D4.3). The reports will also support a learning process between the cities. Further, they are relevant for a wider group of PLEEC partners to discuss the relationship between the three pillars (technology, structure, behaviour) in each of the cities. Main findings/conclusions The Estonian planning system allots the main responsibilities for planning activities to the local level, whereas the regional level (county) is rather weak.
    [Show full text]
  • Tartu Elamuprognoos 2035 Tartu Linna Üldplaneeringu Koostamisel Elamumaade Määratlemiseks Vajalike Alusandmete Väljatöötamine 6000 Uut Kodu!
    Tartu elamuprognoos 2035 Tartu linna üldplaneeringu koostamisel elamumaade määratlemiseks vajalike alusandmete väljatöötamine 6000 uut kodu! Rakendusuuring Tellija: Tartu Linnavalitsus Linnaplaneerimise ja maakorralduse osakond Täitja: Antti Roose ja Martin Gauk August 2015 SISUKORD Tartu elamuprognoos 2035. Kokkuvõte .................................................................................................. 3 Sissejuhatus ........................................................................................................................................... 12 I Metoodika ........................................................................................................................................... 13 II Tartu linna elamuanalüüs ................................................................................................................... 17 2.1. Elamufond ................................................................................................................................... 17 2.2. Elanike paiknemise muutused .................................................................................................... 23 2.3. Elamuturg .................................................................................................................................... 24 III Tartu linna ja eeslinna elamualade planeerimine ............................................................................. 28 3.1. Elamualade planeerimine ja elamuarengu dünaamika .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tartu Linna Ühisveevärgi Ja -Kanalisatsiooni Arendamise Kava Aastateks 2016-2030
    Lisa 2 Tartu Linnavolikogu 8. detsembri 2016. a määruse nr 126 juurde Tartu Linnavolikogu Tartu Linnavalitsus TARTU LINNA ÜHISVEEVÄRGI JA -KANALISATSIOONI ARENDAMISE KAVA AASTATEKS 2016-2030 Tartu linna ühisveevärgi ja -kanalisatsiooni arendamise kava 2016-2030 Tartu 2016 SISUKORD Sissejuhatus ............................................................................................................ 4 1. Sisendid Tartu linna ühisveevärgi ja -kanalisatsiooni arendamise kava koostamiseks ............. 6 1.1. Ühisveevärgi ja –kanalisatsiooni kava koostamise õiguslik raamistik ........................... 6 1.2. Tartu linna arengudokumendid ....................................................................... 9 1.3. Ühisveevärgi ja -kanalisatsiooniga kaetud ala looduslike tingimuste ja maa kuuluvuse lühiiseloomustus ..................................................................................................13 1.4. Ühisveevärgi ja -kanalisatsiooni ala seosed Ida-Eesti vesikonna veemajanduskava põhiseisukohtadega ja keskkonnakasutust reguleerivate dokumentidega .............................14 1.5. Tartu rahvastiku arengu tulevikuväljavaated ja selle mõju ühisveevärgi ja -kanalisatsiooni arendamisele ......................................................................................................16 1.6. Tartu töökohtade olukord ja keskmine brutotulu ................................................24 2. AS Tartu Veevärk missioon, teetähised, kliendid, teenused ja hinnad ..............................27 2.1. Missioon ja juhtimisstruktuur
    [Show full text]
  • Mahajäetud Hooned Tartus
    HUGO TREFFNERI GÜMNAASIUM HELEN TERA 12.A KLASS MAHAJÄETUD HOONED TARTUS Juhendaja: Liisa Tepp Sissejuhatus Linnastumise hoogustumine toob iga päevaga linnadesse uusi elanikke. Märkamatult kaasneb sellega vajadus ehitada uusi elumaju, kontorihooneid jne. Tihti ei pane aga inimesed tähele, et samal ajal kui linnaruumi kerkivad uued kaasaegsed ehitised, jäävad paljud vanemad hooned hoopiski unarusse. Ma valisin selle teema, kuna mahajäetud hooned on minus alati põnevust tekitanud. Nende olemasolu linnas on vältimatu ning nende arvukus märkimisväärne, kuid inimesed ei kipu neile tähelepanu pöörama. See tekitaski minus küsimuse, kui palju on tegelikult Tartus mahajäetud hooneid. Samuti olen teemaga palju kokku puutunud, organiseerides võistkondlikke seiklusmänge, mille läbiviimise kohaks on tihti mahajäetud hooned. Töö põhiliseks eesmärgiks on välja selgitada, kui palju on Tartus mahajäetud ehitisi. Kuigi selleteemalisi artikleid ja kaarte võib internetis leida päris rohkelt, puudub terviklik loend, mis sisaldaks kõiki Tartus leiduvaid mahajäetud maju. Selle põhjuseks võib olla andmete väga kiire muutumine, kuna mahajäetud hooneid asendatakse pidevalt uutega, kuid ka üldine huvi puudumine antud teema vastu. Samuti huvitas mind, kuidas on jagunenud mahajäetud hooned erinevate linnaosade vahel. Uurimistöö aitab ka välja selgitada, kuidas mahajäetud hooneid kasutatakse ning kellele nad kasulikud on. Peamised uurimisküsimused on: Kui palju on Tartus mahajäetud hooneid? Kuidas jaotuvad mahajäetud hooned Tartu linnaosade vahel? Kuidas kasutatakse mahajäetud hooneid? Uurimisküsimustele vastamiseks on kasutatud erinevaid internetiallikaid, kuid suur osa hoonetest on oma silmaga üles leitud ning üle vaadatud. Samuti tutvusin töö tegemise käigus mitmete kaardimootoritega ning kasutasin eelnevalt läbiviidud uuringuid. Uurimistöö alguses annan ülevaate metoodikast, kus kirjutan sellest, kuidas ma saadud tulemusteni jõudsin. Sellele järgnevad üldised tulemused ning ka üksikasjalikumad tulemused linnaosade kaupa.
    [Show full text]
  • Tartu Linnatransport
    Mõisatorni Mõisajärve Vahi Sinepi Melissi Pärna Kvissentali Kaupmehe Mõisapargi Mõisavärava Kvissentali tee Sinepi Melissi Pärna Mõisapargi Mõisavärava Tartu linnatransport Kummeli Raadimõisa Kummeli Raadimõisa põik Kanarbiku Välja Nurme Künni Välja Tavaliin Regular Route Ühistranspordi liinivõrk Skemaatiliselt lihtsustatud Muru Vilja Mõisavärava Välja Leesika Mõisapargi Public Transit Network liin Schematically simplified route Liini lõpp Route End A Vao A Muru Liin peatub mõlemal suunal 5 min jalutuskäigu raadius Adra Bussipeatus Bus Stop Salvest Kruusamäe Põllu Vainu Route stops on both directions 5 min walking radius Põllu A Kruusakuru Killustiku Salvest Muru Rattaringluse jaam Laane Aasa Kruusamäe Kruusavälja Liin peatub ühel suunal Põllu Sambla Bike Share Station Vaikne Rohu LiivamäeKillustiku ERM Route stops at one direction Aasa Estonian National Museum Raadi Aru Rohu A Muru Raadi Raeplats Roheline park Niidu ERM Poe RAADI-KRUUSAMÄENõmme Võidu sild Ülik Vabaduse A puiestee Puiestee ooli Vabaduse pst ERM Roheline põik Aiandi Nurme Bussijaam Turusild Peetri K Coach Station üüni Kalmistu aavi Riia Turu UueturuKesklinn A allikr Metsamaja MaarjaturgLubja A V Kesklinn Surnuaia A Nurme Soola Klaasi IV Zoomeedikum Risti Risti Jänese Kesklinn Staadioni KESKLINN V Soola Zoomeedikum sas A Kit Kesklinn Peetri Orava Tuule Jänese Liiva III dama Risti Sa VI Orava iigi Kesklinn Soola I Metsamaja A T A Roosi Peetri Soola II A kirik Mäe Vanemuise Kesklinn II Väike-Turu
    [Show full text]
  • Tartu Linna Üldplaneering 2040+ (Eelnõu)
    TARTU LINNA ÜLDPLANEERING 2040+ (EELNÕU) Tartu Linnavalitsus TARTU LINNA ÜLDPLANEERING AASTANI 2040+ 2 1. Üldosa .................................................................................................................................. 5 1.1. Üldplaneeringu koostamise vajadus ....................................................................................... 5 1.2. Üldplaneeringu ülesehitus ja sidusus teiste planeeringutega ................................................. 5 2. Ruumilise arengu põhimõtted, rahvastiku paiknemine .......................................................... 6 2.1. Ruumilise arengu põhimõtted ................................................................................................. 6 2.2. Rahvastiku arvu ja paiknemise dünaamika ........................................................................... 10 2.3. Avalik ruum ja avalikud väärtused. Selle arendamise ja kujundamise põhimõtted ............. 13 3. Maa-alade üldised kasutamis- ja ehitustingimused .............................................................. 15 3.1. Maakasutuse üldtingimused ja maakasutuse juhtotstarbed ................................................ 15 3.2. Hoonestus .............................................................................................................................. 25 3.3. Arhitektuurivõistluse koostamise alad, juhud ja kord ........................................................... 27 4. Asustuse arengualad ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]