Bob Rae - Biography
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Governing Council 2013 - 2014
GOVERNING COUNCIL 2013 - 2014 Michael H. Wilson Constituency: Ex Officio Appointed: July 1, 2012 Degrees and Honours: BA, Trinity College, University of Toronto, 1959 P.C., Member of the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada, 1979 CC, Companion of the Order of Canada, 2010 LLD, (Hon) Doctor of Laws Notes: July 2010, Chairman, Barclays Capital Canada Inc. Michael Wilson is the Chairman of Barclays Capital Canada Inc. Based in Toronto, Mr. Wilson joined the firm on June 14, 2010 and is currently responsible for managing Barclays Capital’s client relationships in Canada. Previously, Mr. Wilson was Ambassador of Canada to the United States of America from March 13, 2006 to October 9, 2009. Prior to taking up his position as Canada’s 22nd Ambassador to the United States, Mr. Wilson was Chairman of UBS Canada, an operating division of UBS AG. Before joining UBS in July 2001, Mr. Wilson was responsible for RBC Financial Group's Institutional Asset Management business. He also served as a Vice Chairman of RBC Dominion Securities, responsible for senior client relationships and advice to both Canadian and international companies and governments. Following his ervice in government, Mr. Wilson launched Michael Wilson International in 1993 to offer corporate clients advice on international trade and related issues. Mr. Wilson was elected to the House of Commons in 1979. In September 1984, he was appointed Minister of Finance and remained in that position until May 1991. He then became Minister of Industry, Science and Technology and Minister for International Trade. In this latter position he had responsibility for the NAFTA negotiations. -
Tories Keep Lead, but Liberal-NDP Merger Could Change Status
For Immediate Release Canadian Public Opinion Poll Page 1 of 8 CANADIAN POLITICAL PULSE Tories Keep Lead, But Liberal-NDP Merger Could Change Status Quo A single centre-left party would provide a real challenge to the Conservatives, but only if it is led by Jack Layton or Bob Rae. [TORONTO – May 31, 2010] – The Conservative Party is holding on to a comfortable lead in KEY FINDINGS Canada's political scene, a new Angus Reid Public Opinion poll has found. ¾ Voting Intention: Con. 35%, Lib. 27%, NDP 19%, BQ 9%, Grn. 8%. The online survey of a representative national sample of 2,022 Canadians also looked at the ¾ Scenarios with a merged Liberal / NDP: way the electorate would behave in the event of a Six-point lead over the Tories under merger between the Liberal Party and the New Layton, Tie under Rae, Second place Democratic Party (NDP) under three different under Ignatieff prospective leaders. ¾ Approval Rating: Layton 30%, Harper Voting Intention 29%, Ignatieff 13%. Across the country, 35 per cent of decided voters ¾ Momentum: Layton -3, Harper -24, (unchanged since late April) would cast a ballot Ignatieff -28. for the Conservative candidate in their riding if a new federal election took place today. Full topline results are at the end of this release. The Liberal Party is second with 27 per cent (-1), From May 25 to May 27, 2010, Angus Reid Public Opinion conducted an online survey among 2,022 randomly selected just one point ahead of the proportion of the vote Canadian adults who are Angus Reid Forum panelists. -
The Meritorious Service Cross 1984-2014
The Meritorious Service Cross 1984-2014 CONTACT US Directorate of Honours and Recognition National Defence Headquarters 101 Colonel By Drive Ottawa, ON K1A 0K2 http://www.cmp-cpm.forces.gc.ca/dhr-ddhr/ 1-877-741-8332 © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2014 A-DH-300-000/JD-004 Cat. No. D2-338/2014 ISBN 978-1-100-54835-7 The Meritorious Service Cross 1984-2014 Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, Queen of Canada, wearing her insignia of Sovereign of the Order of Canada and of the Order of Military Merit, in the Tent Room at Rideau Hall, Canada Day 2010 Photo: Canadian Heritage, 1 July 2010 Dedication To the recipients of the Meritorious Service Cross who are the epitome of Canadian military excellence and professionalism. The Meritorious Service Cross | v Table of Contents Dedication ..................................................................................................... v Introduction ................................................................................................... vii Chapter One Historical Context ........................................................................ 1 Chapter Two Statistical Analysis ..................................................................... 17 Chapter Three Insignia and Privileges ............................................................... 37 Conclusion ................................................................................................... 55 Appendix One Letters Patent Creating the Meritorious Service Cross .............. 57 Appendix Two Regulations Governing -
October 28, 2019 the Honourable Doug Ford, MPP Premier of Ontario Legislative Building Queen's Park Toronto, on M7A 1A1 Dear
October 28, 2019 The Honourable Doug Ford, MPP Premier of Ontario Legislative Building Queen’s Park Toronto, ON M7A 1A1 Dear Premier Ford, There are few, if any sectors, which have invested as much and created as many jobs in Ontario, or across Canada, as the cannabis sector. Indeed, Ontario is the centre of licensed cannabis production in Canada: of the 243 licenses to produce cannabis approved by Health Canada, 110 of these (45%) are located in Ontario. The most recent Statistics Canada survey showed that as of the end of 2018 that our sector directly or indirectly employed 5700 people across the province, and this number has significantly increased in 2019. Collectively, Canada’s licensed cannabis producers are very proud of our record and look forward to continuing to contribute to the growth of provincial and national economies. Unfortunately, our ability to continue to invest and sustain the jobs that we have created is being severely challenged by the province’s current retail cannabis policy framework. As Canada’s licensed cannabis producers, we’d like to work with you and your government to leverage the significant capital investment and direct and indirect jobs that we have created in the province. In this respect, we urge you to instruct your Ministers and officials to make every effort to enact all the necessary regulations to allow the number of private cannabis retail points of sale to significantly increase to support Canada’s licensed cannabis producers. Although the province has allocated an initial 25 private retail licenses and has begun the process of allocating a further 50 retail licenses this is clearly not enough. -
BACKGROUNDER January 29, 2018 the 2017 Appointees to the Order
BACKGROUNDER January 29, 2018 The 2017 Appointees to the Order of Ontario Dr. Upton Allen, Toronto – pediatric infectious disease specialist He is an internationally-recognized pediatrician whose multidisciplinary approach to preventing life-threatening infections among children with compromised immune systems has had profound national and global impacts. Daniel Aykroyd*, Sydenham – actor and entrepreneur He is one of the world’s most popular entertainers, well-known for his time on Saturday Night Live and the 1984 classic movie Ghostbusters. He is also a successful businessman, co-founding House of Blues and Crystal Head Vodka, and philanthropist in the Kingston area. Dr. Alan Bernstein, Toronto – cancer researcher and research leader He is a renowned researcher, winning numerous awards, honours and international acclaim. He made game-changing contributions to our understanding of cancer, establishing the basis for important advances in cancer therapy. He has been a visionary leader as Director of Research at the Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, and as the founding and current president of the Canadian Institutes for Health Research. Dr. David Cechetto, London – neuroscientist and director of international medical development projects He is a pioneering researcher who has contributed much of what we know about neural control of the heart and blood vessels. In addition to his research and teaching, he continues to direct development projects in the health care sector in Rwanda. Dr. Peter Chang, Thornhill – lawyer and psychiatrist He has improved access to mental health services for Ontario’s East Asian communities. He established the Hong Fook Mental Health Association to provide culturally-sensitive services in five Asian languages, as well as the Hong Fook Mental Health Foundation to address the stigma of mental illness. -
The 2006 Federal Liberal and Alberta Conservative Leadership Campaigns
Choice or Consensus?: The 2006 Federal Liberal and Alberta Conservative Leadership Campaigns Jared J. Wesley PhD Candidate Department of Political Science University of Calgary Paper for Presentation at: The Annual Meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan May 30, 2007 Comments welcome. Please do not cite without permission. CHOICE OR CONSENSUS?: THE 2006 FEDERAL LIBERAL AND ALBERTA CONSERVATIVE LEADERSHIP CAMPAIGNS INTRODUCTION Two of Canada’s most prominent political dynasties experienced power-shifts on the same weekend in December 2006. The Liberal Party of Canada and the Progressive Conservative Party of Alberta undertook leadership campaigns, which, while different in context, process and substance, produced remarkably similar outcomes. In both instances, so-called ‘dark-horse’ candidates emerged victorious, with Stéphane Dion and Ed Stelmach defeating frontrunners like Michael Ignatieff, Bob Rae, Jim Dinning, and Ted Morton. During the campaigns and since, Dion and Stelmach have been labeled as less charismatic than either their predecessors or their opponents, and both of the new leaders have drawn skepticism for their ability to win the next general election.1 This pair of surprising results raises interesting questions about the nature of leadership selection in Canada. Considering that each race was run in an entirely different context, and under an entirely different set of rules, which common factors may have contributed to the similar outcomes? The following study offers a partial answer. In analyzing the platforms of the major contenders in each campaign, the analysis suggests that candidates’ strategies played a significant role in determining the results. Whereas leading contenders opted to pursue direct confrontation over specific policy issues, Dion and Stelmach appeared to benefit by avoiding such conflict. -
Durham College Editorial Style Guide Table of Contents Introduction
Durham College editorial style guide Table of contents Introduction......................................................................................................................................................................................................................03 Abbreviations and acronyms ........................................................................................................................................................................................03 Accents.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................03 Address formats and contact information ..................................................................................................................................................................03 Apostrophes.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................04 Athletic terms and abbreviations .................................................................................................................................................................................05 Bold ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................05 -
Next Steps in Strategic Mandate Agreements and Changes in the College and University Funding Formulas
Ministry of Advanced Ministère de l’Enseignement Education and Skills supérieur et de la Formation Development professionnelle Deputy Minister Sous-ministre Mowat Block Édifice Mowat Queen’s Park Queen’s Park Toronto ON M7A 1L2 Toronto ON M7A 1L2 MEMORANDUM TO: Executive Heads of Provincially-Assisted Universities and Université de Hearst Presidents of Colleges of Applied Arts and Technology President and CEO of Colleges Ontario President and CEO of Council of Ontario Universities FROM: Sheldon Levy Deputy Minister DATE: December 15 2016 SUBJECT: Next Steps in Strategic Mandate Agreements and Changes in the College and University Funding Formulas Strategic Mandate Agreements With the first cycle of Strategic Mandate Agreements (SMAs) set to expire in 2017, the ministry is beginning the process of engaging with colleges and universities for the next round of SMA negotiations. I am writing to inform you of the appointment of Special Advisors to support these negotiations and of changes to the college and university funding formulas. I am pleased to announce that Bonnie Patterson and Brian Tamblyn have agreed to serve as Special Advisor — Universities and Special Advisor — Colleges, respectively. Both Bonnie and Brian have held top administrative positions in the sector, acquired in- depth knowledge about postsecondary education through their extensive experience, and are well-known and respected within the sectors (their biographies are appended). Dan Lang has also joined the Deputy Minister’s Office as a Special Advisor, to support this process. Dan is Professor Emeritus at the University of Toronto Ontario Institute for Studies in Education (OISE), with a wealth of experience in higher education. -
JOHN A. MACDONALD ? Seeing Canada's First Prime Minister in the Context of His and Our Times
Thomas H. B. Symons Desmond Morton Donald Wright Bob Rae E. A. Heaman Patrice Dutil Barbara Messamore James Daschuk A-HISTORICAL Look at JOHN A. MACDONALD ? Seeing Canada's First Prime Minister in the Context of His and Our Times Summer 2015 Introduction 3 Macdonald’s Makeover SUMMER 2015 Randy Boswell John A. Macdonald: Macdonald's push for prosperity 6 A Founder and Builder 22 overcame conflicts of identity Thomas H. B. Symons E. A. Heaman John Alexander Macdonald: Macdonald’s Enduring Success 11 A Man Shaped by His Age 26 in Quebec Desmond Morton Patrice Dutil A biographer’s flawed portrait Formidable, flawed man 14 reveals hard truths about history 32 ‘impossible to idealize’ Donald Wright Barbara Messamore A time for reflection, Acknowledging patriarch’s failures 19 truth and reconciliation 39 will help Canada mature as a nation Bob Rae James Daschuk Canadian Issues is published by/Thèmes canadiens est publié par Canada History Fund Fonds pour l’histoire du Canada PRÉSIDENT/PResIDENT Canadian Issues/Thèmes canadiens is a quarterly publication of the Association for Canadian Jocelyn Letourneau, Université Laval Studies (ACS). It is distributed free of charge to individual and institutional members of the ACS. INTRODUCTION PRÉSIDENT D'HONNEUR/HONORARY ChaIR Canadian Issues is a bilingual publication. All material prepared by the ACS is published in both The Hon. Herbert Marx French and English. All other articles are published in the language in which they are written. SecRÉTAIRE DE LANGUE FRANÇAISE ET TRÉSORIER/ MACDONALd’S MAKEOVER FRENch-LaNGUAGE SecRETARY AND TReasURER Opinions expressed in articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of Vivek Venkatesh, Concordia University the ACS. -
Discussion Following the Remarks of the Hon. Mr. Rae and Ambassador Giffin Proceedings of the Canada-United States Law Institute
Canada-United States Law Journal Volume 30 Issue Article 11 January 2004 Discussion following the Remarks of the Hon. Mr. Rae and Ambassador Giffin oceedingsPr of the Canada-United States Law Institute Conference on Multiple Actors in Canada-U.S. Relations: Multiple Issues, Multiple Actors - The Players in Canada-U.S. Relation Discussion Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/cuslj Part of the Transnational Law Commons Recommended Citation Discussion, Discussion following the Remarks of the Hon. Mr. Rae and Ambassador Giffin oceedingsPr of the Canada-United States Law Institute Conference on Multiple Actors in Canada-U.S. Relations: Multiple Issues, Multiple Actors - The Players in Canada-U.S. Relation, 30 Can.-U.S. L.J. 27 (2004) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/cuslj/vol30/iss/11 This Speech is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canada-United States Law Journal by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. DISCUSSION FOLLOWING THE REMARKS OF THE HON. MR. RAE AND AMBASSADOR GIFFIN MR. GIFFIN: I have to respond to your point about your hope that our election will resolve some questions, I think our election has tried to resolve those very questions. I think there is a very vital debate going on between the President of the United States and the U.S. Senator who will be the De- mocratic nominee about our role in the world and whether or not it ought to be unilateral, multilateral, or whether it ought to engage the U.N. -
Diversifying the Bar: Lawyers Make History Biographies of Early and Exceptional Ontario Lawyers of Diverse Communities Arran
■ Diversifying the bar: lawyers make history Biographies of Early and Exceptional Ontario Lawyers of Diverse Communities Arranged By Year Called to the Bar, Part 2: 1941 to the Present Click here to download Biographies of Early and Exceptional Ontario Lawyers of Diverse Communities Arranged By Year Called to the Bar, Part 1: 1797 to 1941 For each lawyer, this document offers some or all of the following information: name gender year and place of birth, and year of death where applicable year called to the bar in Ontario (and/or, until 1889, the year admitted to the courts as a solicitor; from 1889, all lawyers admitted to practice were admitted as both barristers and solicitors, and all were called to the bar) whether appointed K.C. or Q.C. name of diverse community or heritage biographical notes name of nominating person or organization if relevant sources used in preparing the biography (note: living lawyers provided or edited and approved their own biographies including the names of their community or heritage) suggestions for further reading, and photo where available. The biographies are ordered chronologically, by year called to the bar, then alphabetically by last name. To reach a particular period, click on the following links: 1941-1950, 1951-1960, 1961-1970, 1971-1980, 1981-1990, 1991-2000, 2001-. To download the biographies of lawyers called to the bar before 1941, please click Biographies of Early and Exceptional Ontario Lawyers of Diverse Communities Arranged By Year Called to the Bar, Part 2: 1941 to the Present For more information on the project, including the set of biographies arranged by diverse community rather than by year of call, please click here for the Diversifying the Bar: Lawyers Make History home page. -
The Office of Premier of Ontario 1945-2010: Who Really Advises?
The Office of Premier of Ontario 1945-2010: Who Really Advises? Patrice Dutil and Peter P. Constantinou This article focuses on the composition of the Ontario Premier’s office and uses an institutionalist approach to put the influence of advisors in context. It looks at expenditures attributed in the Public Accounts to the Premier’s Office and staffing. It assumes that the number of advisors and their placement in the decision-making hierarchy should have a material impact on the quantity and quality of the advice being received by the Premier. Among other things the articles 2013 CanLIIDocs 388 shows that the classic policy/administration divide was not clearly defined in Ontario. Instead it exhibits a back-and-forth habit of experimentation that depended on the personality of the prime minister, the capacities of political and bureaucratic advisors, and the stages of the governmental cycle. There have been discernible cycles in the hiring of political staff and in the growth of expenditures that would indicate the Premier’s Office was more concerned with campaign preparations and externalities than it was in rivaling bureaucratic influence. Compared to Ottawa, where the structures of the Prime Minister’s Office and the Privy Council Office have been far more distinct in this similar time frame, the Ontario experience reveals itself as one of constant experimentation. or almost two generations, observers of all sorts In her study for the Gomery Commission, Liane have almost unanimously lamented the growth in Benoit noted that political staff (or “exempt staff”) Finfluence of prime ministerial advisors. Members played a valuable role in advising Prime Ministers.