DOCSLIB.ORG

Optimisation of a Multi-Gravity Separator with Novel Modifications

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Optimisation of a Multi-Gravity Separator with Novel Modifications minerals Article Optimisation of a Multi-Gravity Separator with Novel Modifications for the Recovery of Ferberite Robert Fitzpatrick 1,*, Patrick Hegarty 1, Keith Fergusson 1, Gavyn Rollinson 1, Weiguo Xie 1 and Treve Mildren 2 1 Camborne School of Mines, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Exeter TR10 9FE, UK; [email protected] (P.H.); [email protected] (K.F.); [email protected] (G.R.); [email protected] (W.X.) 2 Gravity Mining Ltd., Glencarrow, New Road, Stithians TR3 7BL, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +44-(0)1326-254-141 Received: 15 February 2018; Accepted: 20 April 2018; Published: 2 May 2018 Abstract: Tungsten is considered by the European Union as a critical raw material for future development due to its expected demand and scarcity of resource within Europe. It is therefore, critical to optimize European tungsten operations and maximise recoveries. The role of enhanced gravity/centrifugal concentrators in recovering tungsten from ultra-fine fractions should form an important part of this aim. Reported herein are the results of investigations to improve efficiency of Wolf Minerals’ Draklends mine, a major European tungsten mine, by recovering saleable material from a magnetic waste stream of a low-intensity magnetic separator using an enhanced gravity concentrator. The mine hosts wolframite and ferberite as the main tungsten bearing mineral species. A Mozley multi-gravity separator (MGS) C-900 was selected as it is suited to exploiting small variations in mineral density to affect a separation. Working with a current manufacturer, a novel scraping blade system was tested. To assess the MGS in a statistically valid manner, a response surface methodology was followed to determine optimal test conditions. The test programme showed that the most important parameters were drum speed and wash water rate. Under optimal conditions the model predicted that 40% of the tungsten could be recovered above the required grade of 43% WO3. Keywords: centrifugal gravity separation; tungsten-bearing minerals; quantitative mineralogy; response surface method; central composite rotatable design 1. Introduction 1.1. Background Tungsten is recognised by the European Union as one of 27 critical raw materials for future economic growth and prosperity. Tungsten has a wide range of properties due to its unique physical properties which include extremely high melting point and hardness when alloyed with carbon. The principle application of tungsten is as a cemented carbide followed by alloys with various other metals. This economic importance combined with a high reliance on imports into the EU, have led to the classification as a critical metal, see Figure1. The European Union imported 15,000 tonnes of tungsten concentrate in 2012, relying on Russia for 98% of the total. World supply of tungsten is dominated by China which in 2012 produced 85% of global supply and consumed 51% [2]. To help reduce the reliance on import of tungsten the European Union has providing funding for the OptimOre project (Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme grant 642201). One objective of this project is to optimise the processing of tungsten ores to help diversify global supply and make European deposits more competitive. To support this objective Minerals 2018, 8, 191; doi:10.3390/min8050191 www.mdpi.com/journal/minerals Minerals 2018, 8, 191 2 of 18 this article reports the results of using an enhanced gravity concentrator to improve the recovery of tungsten at the Drakelands mine, a major European mine site operated by Wolf Minerals Ltd. Specifically, investigations were undertaken to optimise recovery of tungsten-bearing minerals using a Mozley MGS with novel modifications. The objective of the work was to assess the feasibility of producing a saleable product from this stream and to compare the novel modifications to the MGS withMinerals the 2018 conventional, 8, x FOR PEER system. REVIEW 2 of 17 Non-critical raw materials 5.0 LREEs Critical raw materials HREEs 4.5 Antimony Magnesium 4.0 Phosphorus Bismuth 3.5 Niobium 3.0 Borate Natural graphite Scandium 2.5 PGMs Indium Beryllium Supply Risk Supply 2.0 Bauxite Germanium Tungsten Helium Vanadium Cobalt Baryte 1.5 Sapele wood Hafnium Gallium Phosphat e rock Natural cork Coking coal Silicon Fluorspar Natural Rubber Rhenium Manganese 1.0 Lithium metal Tantalum Natural Teak… Tellurium Tin Molybdenum Chromium Feldspar Magnesite Iron ore Gypsum Sulphur Potash 0.5 Talc Silver Perlite Kaolin Titanium Selenium Aluminium Silica sand Nickel Gold Aggregates Diatomite Zinc Copper 0.0 Bentoni… Limestone Lead 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 Economic Importance FigureFigure 1.1. European Commission criticality assessment for raw materials withwith criticalcritical materialsmaterials highlightedhighlighted inin red,red, tungstentungsten hashas beenbeen furtherfurther highlightedhighlighted byby thethe authorsauthors [[1]1].. The European Union imported 15,000 tonnes of tungsten concentrate in 2012, relying on Russia The feed to the LIMS separator is gravity concentrate which has been roasted under reducing for 98% of the total. World supply of tungsten is dominated by China which in 2012 produced 85% conditions to convert hematite (Fe O ) to magnetite (Fe O ). The LIMS magnetic stream is currently of global supply and consumed 251%3 [2]. To help reduce3 4 the reliance on import of tungsten the treated as waste but has a high tungsten grade (over 20%) and so represents a measurable loss within European Union has providing funding for the OptimOre project (Horizon 2020 research and the operation. If saleable material can be recovered from this stream in an efficient manner it will innovation programme grant 642201). One objective of this project is to optimise the processing of increase profitability at the mine site and help to decrease the energy per tonne of concentrate produced. tungsten ores to help diversify global supply and make European deposits more competitive. To Both of these outcomes are important to help ensure the competitiveness of European based mines in a support this objective this article reports the results of using an enhanced gravity concentrator to global market dominated by a small number of countries. improve the recovery of tungsten at the Drakelands mine, a major European mine site operated by 1.2.Wolf Multi-Gravity Minerals Ltd Separator. Specifically, Device investigations were undertaken to optimise recovery of tungsten- bearing minerals using a Mozley MGS with novel modifications. The objective of the work was to assessThe the multi-gravity feasibility of separatorproducing (MGS) a saleable also knownproduct as from the enhanced-gravitythis stream and to separator compare (EGS) the novel was designedmodifications in the to late the 1980’sMGS with to early the 1990’sconventional for the system. concentration of fine and ultra-fine heavy minerals, withThe early feed applications to the LIMS focusing separator on cassiterite,is gravity concentrate chromite, celestite which has and been magnetite roasted [3 under]. The reducing machine operates on similar principles to a shaking table but utilises rotational motion to generate centrifugal conditions to convert hematite (Fe2O3) to magnetite (Fe3O4). The LIMS magnetic stream is currently forcestreated greater as waste than but those has a of high gravity. tungsten This grade increase (over in force20%) allowsand so forrepresents more efficient a measurable separation loss atwithin finer the operation. If saleable material can be recovered from this stream in an efficient manner it will increase profitability at the mine site and help to decrease the energy per tonne of concentrate produced. Both of these outcomes are important to help ensure the competitiveness of European based mines in a global market dominated by a small number of countries. Minerals 2018, 8, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 17 1.2. Multi-Gravity Separator Device The multi-gravity separator (MGS) also known as the enhanced-gravity separator (EGS) was designed in the late 1980’s to early 1990’s for the concentration of fine and ultra-fine heavy minerals, with early applications focusing on cassiterite, chromite, celestite and magnetite [3]. The machine Minerals 2018, 8, 191 3 of 18 operates on similar principles to a shaking table but utilises rotational motion to generate centrifugal forces greater than those of gravity. This increase in force allows for more efficient separation at finer sizes. The main main design and operating variables of the MGS MGS are are summarised in Figure 2 2 alongsidealongside thethe principle forces acting on a particle. Figure 2. MGS operating and design (denoted with *) variables and principle forces (Force Diagram modifiedmodified after [[4]).4]). Due to the large number of variables and interactions, most modelling work for the MGS has consisted of determining optimal conditions using regression analysis. A A review review of of this research literature reveals that the rotational velocity of the drum has been identifiedidentified as the most important factor on grade and recovery [[55–88].]. Both [[5,7]5,7] concluded that rotational velocity and pulp density were the most important factors with regardsregards toto optimisation. optimisation. In In [6 ][6] the the conclusion conclusion was was that rotationalthat rotational velocity velocity had a significanthad a significant impact whereasimpact whereas inclination inclination and wash and water wash flowrate water flowrate had a trivial had effecta trivial on effect performance. on performance. In [8] it was In [8] observed it was observedthat wash that water wash had anwater important had an interaction important withinteraction performance with performance at high wash at water high flowrates wash water and flowrateshigh rotational and high velocity. rotational The authors velocity. of [5 ]The also authors observed of an[5] important also observed interaction an important between washinteraction water betweenand pulp wash density.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Current Developments in Uk Mining Projects
    CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS IN UK MINING PROJECTS C P Broadbent1) and C A Blackmore1) 1)Wardell Armstrong International Ltd, 46 Chancery Lane, London WC2A 1JE, UK 1 Introduction In October 2017 The Mining Technology Division (MTD) of the IOM3 organised a highly successful conference “Current Developments in the UK Mining Industry”. The aims and objectives of the conference was to define the then current state of the UK Mining Industry1. This conference was a great success and, with the exception of a presentation on Wolf Minerals Ltd, Hemerdon Project, gave the definitive status of most major UK Mining Projects. This paper provides an update of many of these projects. Although the last UK deep pit coal mine, Kellingley Colliery, North Yorkshire closed in December 20152 and was capped off in March 2016. The UK still has large reserves of available fossil fuels and many types of industrial minerals and metals are found in the diverse geology of the UK. Presently there are a number of major initiatives active making 2018, despite events at Hemerdon, one of the most active years in recent times for “new” UK mining ventures. The locations of the projects covered in this paper are shown in Figure 1. 1) 1 Sirius Minerals Plc 2 British Fluorspar Limited 3 West Cumbria Mining 4 Cornish Lithium Limited 5 South Crofty – Strongbow Exploration 8 6 Cornwall Resources Limited – Redmoor Project 7 Dalradian Gold Limited – Curraghinalt Project 8 Scotgold Resources – Cononish Mine 7 3 1 9 Anglesea Mining Plc – Parys Mountain 10 Wolf Minerals Limited - Drakelands Mine 2 Figure 1: Location of the projects c 9 o vered in this paper this paper 10 6 4 5 1 Current Developments – The UK Mining Industry – Presentations at MTD Conference, London 4-5 October 2017 2 Dodgson, L.
    [Show full text]
  • Implications for Environmental and Economic Geology
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Kinetics of the Dissolution of Scheelite in Groundwater: Implications for Environmental and Economic Geology A Thesis submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Geological Sciences by Stephanie Danielle Montgomery March 2013 Thesis Committee: Dr. Michael A. McKibben, Chairperson Dr. Christopher Amrhein Dr. Timothy Lyons Copyright by Stephanie Danielle Montgomery 2013 The Thesis of Stephanie Danielle Montgomery is approved: _________________________________________ _________________________________________ _________________________________________ Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS Kinetics of the Dissolution of Scheelite in Groundwater: Implications for Environmental and Economic geology by Stephanie Danielle Montgomery Masters of Science, Graduate Program in Geological Sciences University of California, Riverside, March 2013 Dr. Michael McKibben, Chairperson Tungsten, an emerging contaminant, has no EPA standard for its permissible levels in drinking water. At sites in California, Nevada, and Arizona there may be a correlation between elevated levels of tungsten in drinking water and clusters of childhood acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL). Developing a better understanding of how tungsten is released from rocks into surface and groundwater is therefore of growing environmental interest. Knowledge of tungstate ore mineral weathering processes, particularly the rates of dissolution of scheelite (CaWO4) in groundwater, could improve models of how tungsten is released and transported in natural waters. Our research focused on the experimental determination of the rates and products of scheelite dissolution in 0.01 M NaCl (a proxy for groundwater), as a function of temperature, pH, and mineral surface area. Batch reactor experiments were conducted within constant temperature circulation baths over a pH range of 3-10.5.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter June 2006
    w NEWSLETTER INTERNATIONAL TUNGSTEN INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION Rue Père Eudore Devroye 245, 1150 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 770 8878 Fax: + 32 2 770 8898 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.itia.info The programme will begin on Tuesday Toxicologic Assessment for the Production and 19th evening with a Reception in the hotel jointly Mechanical Processing of Materials containing hosted by Tiberon Minerals and ITIA. Tungsten Heavy Metal. Not least will be an introduction to the formation of a Consortium to deal Working sessions will be held on Wednesday Annual with the implications of REACH on behalf of the and Thursday mornings and papers will tungsten industry, both legal and financial. include: General Readers will recall that REACH will place an obligation ▼ HSE work programme on individual companies to submit a technical dossier and register any chemical substance Meeting ▼ Ganzhou’s Tungsten Industry and Its Progress manufactured or imported into the EU in quantities ▼ Geostatistics in the mid and long-term planning for of more than 1 tonne. the Panasqueira deposit (Nuno Alves, Beralt Tin Tuesday 26 to and Wolfram) In order to assist companies with the registration process, the Commission recommends the creation ▼ Thursday 28 Paper by Zhuzhou Cemented Carbide of industry Consortia. These Consortia will enable the ▼ Update on Tiberon’s Development of Tungsten joint development, submission and sharing of September 2006 Mining in Vietnam information with the aim of reducing the compliance burden on individual companies and preventing ▼ Update on China’s Tungsten Industry Hyatt Regency Hotel, unnecessary additional animal testing. ▼ Update on US Tungsten Market (Dean Schiller, Boston, USA OsramSylvania Products) Both members and non-members will be equally ▼ Review of Trends in 2006 (Nigel Tunna, Metal-Pages) welcome to join the Consortium, saving themselves considerable amounts of money and time by so doing.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Ferberite and the Wolframite Series A
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OT1S SMITH, DIRECTOR .jf BULLETIN 583 \ ' ' COLORADO FERBERITE AND THE r* i WOLFRAMITE SERIES A BY FRANK L. HESS AND WALDEMAR T. SCHALLER WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT FEINTING OFFICE 1914 CONTENTS. THE MINERAL RELATIONS OF FERBERiTE, by Frank L. Hess.................. 7 Geography and production............................................. 7 Characteristics of the ferberite.......................................... 8 " Geography and geology of the Boulder district........................... 8 Occurrence, vein systems, and relations................................. 9 Characteristics of the ore.............................................. 10 Minerals associated with the ferberite................................... 12 Adularia.......................................................... 12 Calcite........................................................... 12 Chalcedony....................................................... 12 Chalcopyrite...................................................... 12 Galena........................................................... 12 Gold and silver.................................................... 12 Hamlinite (?).................................................... 14 Hematite (specular)................................................ 15 Limonite........................................................ 16 Magnetite........................................................ 17 Molybdenite..................................................... 17 Opal............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Drakelands Mine (Formerly Known As Hemerdon) in England Owned by Wolf Minerals Ltd
    Newsletter_06_2016_9.5_Layout 1 02.08.16 09:20 Seite 1 ITIA Tungsten Newsletter – June 2016 In Pursuit of Tungsten Concentrate The focus of this issue is the production of concentrate, with the two World Wars of the last century and officially opened introductions to the Nui Phao mine in Vietnam owned by again in 2015. Masan Resources and to the Drakelands mine (formerly known as Hemerdon) in England owned by Wolf Minerals Ltd. The Our warmest thanks are due to the authors of these articles which former, commissioned in 2013, is the world’s largest operating contain extensive information about both projects, absorbing to mine whilst the latter produced small amounts of ore during anyone with an interest in the supply of the raw material. International Tungsten Industry Association 454-458 Chiswick High Road, London W4 5TT, UK Tel: +44 20 8996 2221 Fax: +44 20 8994 8728 Email: [email protected] www.itia.info ‧ ‧ ‧ ‧ Newsletter_06_2016_9.5_Layout 1 02.08.16 09:20 Seite 2 Masan Resources Nui Phao Project Bich Dinh Ngoc, Manager Community Liaison & Economic Restoration, Nui Phao Mining Company Masan Resources Corporation (Masan), listed on Hanoi’s the focus was changed to tungsten and, on further UPCoM exchange (UPCoM:MSR), is the largest producer exploration, the first geological resource estimate was of primary and mid-stream tungsten products outside released in 2003. Continued success of further drilling of China. Its flagship asset, the Nui Phao open-pit poly- programs and metallurgical test work encouraged the metallic mine, located approximately 85 km north-east company to undertake environmental and community of Hanoi in Thai Nguyen Province, was acquired by baseline studies and the procurement of required per- Masan Group in 2010 as a greenfield project.
    [Show full text]
  • Tungsten Minerals and Deposits
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRANKLIN K. LANE, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director Bulletin 652 4"^ TUNGSTEN MINERALS AND DEPOSITS BY FRANK L. HESS WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1917 ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS PUBLICATION MAY BE PROCURED FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON, D. C. AT 25 CENTS PER COPY CONTENTS. Page. Introduction.............................................................. , 7 Inquiries concerning tungsten......................................... 7 Survey publications on tungsten........................................ 7 Scope of this report.................................................... 9 Technical terms...................................................... 9 Tungsten................................................................. H Characteristics and properties........................................... n Uses................................................................. 15 Forms in which tungsten is found...................................... 18 Tungsten minerals........................................................ 19 Chemical and physical features......................................... 19 The wolframites...................................................... 21 Composition...................................................... 21 Ferberite......................................................... 22 Physical features.............................................. 22 Minerals of similar appearance.................................
    [Show full text]
  • Variation of (I) Cond
    PTE/16/59 Development Management Committee 23 November 2016 County Matter: Minerals South Hams District: Variation of (i) condition 3 of planning permission 9/42/49/0542/85/3 to allow the continued extraction of tungsten and tin, processing and disposal of mineral wastes until 5 June 2036 and (ii) removal of condition 13 of planning permission 9/42/49/0542/85/3 to remove the restriction on the operating hours of the primary crusher Location: Drakelands Mine, Drakelands, Nr Plymouth Applicant: Wolf Minerals (UK) Ltd Application No: 9/42/49/0542/85/3 Date application received by Devon County Council: 9 December 2015 Report of the Head of Planning, Transportation and Environment Please note that the following recommendations are subject to consideration and determination by the Committee before taking effect. Recommendation: It is recommended that: (a) The application to vary Condition 3 (to extend the life of the site from June 2021 to June 2036) and to remove Condition 13 (restriction of hours of operation of the primary crusher) of the existing permission be granted and; (b) The remaining conditions be amended as set out in Appendix II. (c) That Committee notes the terms of the Unilateral Undertaking attached at Appendix III. (d) That Committee notes the Habitats Regulations Assessment attached at Appendix IV. 1. Summary 1.1 This application is to extend the permitted life of the Drakelands (previously Hemerdon) Tungsten Mine until 2036 and to remove a condition relating to restrictions on the primary crusher. The application was accompanied
    [Show full text]
  • Primary Minerals of the Jáchymov Ore District
    Journal of the Czech Geological Society 48/34(2003) 19 Primary minerals of the Jáchymov ore district Primární minerály jáchymovského rudního revíru (237 figs, 160 tabs) PETR ONDRU1 FRANTIEK VESELOVSKÝ1 ANANDA GABAOVÁ1 JAN HLOUEK2 VLADIMÍR REIN3 IVAN VAVØÍN1 ROMAN SKÁLA1 JIØÍ SEJKORA4 MILAN DRÁBEK1 1 Czech Geological Survey, Klárov 3, CZ-118 21 Prague 1 2 U Roháèových kasáren 24, CZ-100 00 Prague 10 3 Institute of Rock Structure and Mechanics, V Holeovièkách 41, CZ-182 09, Prague 8 4 National Museum, Václavské námìstí 68, CZ-115 79, Prague 1 One hundred and seventeen primary mineral species are described and/or referenced. Approximately seventy primary minerals were known from the district before the present study. All known reliable data on the individual minerals from Jáchymov are presented. New and more complete X-ray powder diffraction data for argentopyrite, sternbergite, and an unusual (Co,Fe)-rammelsbergite are presented. The follow- ing chapters describe some unknown minerals, erroneously quoted minerals and imperfectly identified minerals. The present work increases the number of all identified, described and/or referenced minerals in the Jáchymov ore district to 384. Key words: primary minerals, XRD, microprobe, unit-cell parameters, Jáchymov. History of mineralogical research of the Jáchymov Chemical analyses ore district Polished sections were first studied under the micro- A systematic study of Jáchymov minerals commenced scope for the identification of minerals and definition early after World War II, during the period of 19471950. of their relations. Suitable sections were selected for This work was aimed at supporting uranium exploitation. electron microprobe (EMP) study and analyses, and in- However, due to the general political situation and the teresting domains were marked.
    [Show full text]
  • The Drakelands Project Will Be the UK's First New Mine for More Than 40
    MATERIALS WORLD FIrst, teLL me A LIttLE BIT ABOUT THE prOjeCT. The Drakelands project will be the Hemerdon is the third-largest tungsten and tin resource in the world and the Drakelands Mine project, based there, will provide a secure supply of tungsten and UK’s first new mine for more than valuable export revenue for the UK. The project will create more than 200 jobs and 40 years, and it will use ZEISS’s pump hundreds of millions of pounds into the Plymouth, Devon and UK economies Mineralogic Mining automated over the next decade. Its estimated production of 5,000 tonnes per annum of tungsten concentrate and 1,000 tonnes of tin concentrate will mean the £123 million mineralogy system. Rhiannon mine will contribute around 3% of global tungsten supply. Garth Jones speaks to Dr Benjamin Tordoff, Segment Manager for WHAT HAS beeN THE TImefrAme FOR THIS prOjeCT? Mining and Minerals at ZEISS, about Tungsten was discovered at Hemerdon in 1867 and the deposit was identified as the mine and the technology. being a large tungsten-tin vein complex in 1916, during exploration for metal resources to contribute to the war effort – it was subsequently used by government agencies in both world wars. In 1986, after an extensive drilling programme and public enquiry, Amax Exploration UK and Hemerdon Mining and Smelting UK Ltd obtained planning permission to open the mine as an opencast operation working to a depth of 200m. At that time, increased tungsten production by China brought about a considerable reduction in the commodity price and, as a result, the Hemerdon project was placed into care-and-maintenance.
    [Show full text]
  • Tungstite WO3 • H2O C 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, Version 1
    Tungstite WO3 • H2O c 2001-2005 Mineral Data Publishing, version 1 Crystal Data: Orthorhombic. Point Group: 2/m 2/m 2/m. As platy crystals with rhombic outline, to 75 µm, in radiating aggregates; commonly earthy to pulverulent, massive. Physical Properties: Cleavage: {001}, perfect; {110}, imperfect. Hardness = 2.5 D(meas.) = 5.517 D(calc.) = 5.78 Optical Properties: Transparent. Color: Bright yellow, golden yellow, dark yellow-orange, yellowish green; yellow in transmitted light. Luster: Resinous, pearly on cleavages. Optical Class: Biaxial (–). Pleochroism: X = colorless; Y = Z = deep yellow. Orientation: X = c; Y = b. Dispersion: r< v,rather strong. Absorption: Strong; Z < Y < X or X > Y > Z. α = 2.09(2) β = 2.24(2) γ = 2.26(2) 2V(meas.) = 26◦–27◦ Cell Data: Space Group: P mnb. a = 5.249(2) b = 10.711(5) c = 5.133(2) Z = 4 X-ray Powder Pattern: Kootenay Belle mine, Canada. 3.463 (100), 5.36 (80), 2.556 (50), 1.731 (45), 2.616 (40), 1.851 (40), 1.634 (40) Chemistry: (1) (2) (3) WO3 86.20 91.30 92.79 SiO2 0.96 Fe2O3 4.14 0.18 FeO 1.21 CaO 0.54 H2O 7.72 7.46 7.21 Total 99.81 99.90 100.00 • (1) Kootenay Belle mine, Canada. (2) Calacalani mine, Bolivia. (3) WO3 H2O. Occurrence: An alteration product of tungsten minerals, especially wolframite and ferberite, in hydrothermal tungsten-bearing deposits. Association: Hydrotungstite, ferritungstite, wolframite, ferberite, scheelite. Distribution: In the USA, from Lane’s bismuth mine, Monroe, north of Trumbull, Fairfield Co., Connecticut; in the Boriana mine, Mohave Co., and the Black Pearl mine, Camp Wood district, Yavapai Co., Arizona.
    [Show full text]
  • Wolf Minerals Limited (The Company)
    Sydney Mining Club Presentation 5th November 2015 Russell Clark, Managing Director ASX:WLF|AIM:WLFE www.wolfminerals.com.au Disclaimer The information contained in this document has been prepared based upon information supplied by Wolf Minerals Limited (the Company). This Document does not constitute an offer or invitation to any person to subscribe for or apply for any securities in the Company. While the information contained in this Document has been prepared in good faith, neither the Company nor any of its shareholders, directors, officers, agents, employees or advisers give any representations or warranties (express or implied) as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the information in this Document, or of any other written or oral information made or to be made available to any interested party or its advisers (all such information being referred to as Information) and liability therefore is expressly disclaimed. Accordingly, to the full extent permitted by law, neither the Company nor any of its shareholders, directors, officers, agents, employees or advisers take any responsibility for, or will accept any liability whether direct or indirect, express or implied, contractual, tortious, statutory or otherwise, in respect of, the accuracy or completeness of the Information or for any of the opinions contained in this Document or for any errors, omissions or misstatements or for any loss, howsoever arising, from the use of this Document. Neither the issue of this Document nor any part of its contents is to be taken as any form of commitment on the part of the Company to proceed with any transaction and the right is reserved to terminate any discussions or negotiations with any person.
    [Show full text]
  • Illustrative Examples Across Europe
    SLO Good Practices and Recent Disputes Illustrative Examples Across Europe 30 April 2021 Illustrative examples of social licence to operate across Europe Authors Austria: Gerfried Tiffner and Kornelia Lemmer (VESTE/Eisenerz), Michael Tost (Montanuniversität Leoben) Bosnia: Olga Sidorenko and Rauno Sairinen (University of Eastern Finland) Finland: Toni Eerola (Geological Survey of Finland) Poland: Zuzanna Lacny and Anna Ostrega (AGH University of Science and Technology) Serbia: Olga Sidorenko and Rauno Sairinen (University of Eastern Finland) Slovakia: Igor Ďuriška and Tomáš Pavlik (Technical University of Kosice) Spain: Ramon Cabrera (SIEMCALSA) Sweden: Gregory Poelzer (Lulea University of Technology) United Kingdom: Rowan Halkes and Frances Wall (University of Exeter) Compiled and edited by Pamela Lesser, University of Lapland WWiWith special thanks to Meng Chun Lee (GKZ) and Katri-Maaria Kyllönen (University of Lapland) for their enormous substantive and organizational contributions. Of Note: The illustrative examples were compiled during the second and third years of MIREU – 2019 and 2020. While the authors provided updates in early 2021, because the social acceptance of projects is so fluid, there may be discrepancies between the updates and the publication date of 30 April 2021. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT & DISCLAIMER This publication is part of a project that has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement No 776811. This publication reflects only the authors’ view. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of the information contained in this publication. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorized, provided the source is acknowledged and the publisher is given prior notice and sent a copy.
    [Show full text]