DOCSLIB.ORG

Nomination Form

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nomination Form VUL - il/d) /o;;, 0 /J f \.ff · l /r:/ '/ NPS Form 10-900 0MB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 10.90) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "NIA" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form I Q.9QOa). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Pro ert historic name: Virginia Washington Monument other names/site number: Washington Monument sculpture group, George Washington Equestrian Statue VDHR # 127-0189 2. Location street & number Capitol Square not for publication city or town Richmond (Independent City) vicinity state Virginia code VA county________ code 760 Zip 23219 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this (X) nomination __ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property (X) meets __ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant (X) nationally_ statewide ntinuation sheet for additional comm9ents) ~ ,z. ----- /it-----~.5 Signature of certifying official D e Virginia Department of Historic Resources State or Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property (X) meets __ does not meet the National Register criteria. (_See continuation sheet for additional comments.) Signature of commenting or other official Date State or Federal agency and bureau 4. National Park Service Certification I, hereby certify that this property is: __ entered in the National Register See continuation sheet. __ determined eligible for the Signature of Keeper-------------­ National Register See continuation sheet. Date of Action---------------- _ determined not eligible for the National Register __ removed from the National Register _ other (explain): ________ NPS Form 10-900 0MB No. 1024-4018 (Rev. 10-90) U.S. Department of the Interior Virginia Washington Monument National Park Service Richmond, Virginia 5. Classification Ownership of Property (Check as many boxes as apply) _private _ public-local (X) public-State _ public-Federal Category of Property (Check only one box) building( s) district site structure (X) object Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing _ 0_ _ 0_ buildings 0 0 sites 0 0 structures _o_ objects 0 Total Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register_ O_ Name of related multiple property listing (Enter "NI A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing.) N/ A 6. Function or Use Historic Funcgons (Enter categories from instructions) Cat: Culture and Recreation Sub: Work of Art (Statue) Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions) Cat: Culture and Recreation Sub: Work of Art (Statue) 7. Descri tion Architectural Classification (Enter categories from instructions) Mid-l 9'h Century Classical Revival Materials (Enter categories from instructions) Base: Granite with bronze details Statuary: Bronze other ----------------- Narrative Description (Describe the historic and current condition of the property on one or more continuation sheets.) NPS Form I0-900 0MB No. 1024-4018 (Rev. 10-90) U.S. Department of the Interior Virginia Washington Monument National Park Service Richmond, Virginia 8. Statement of Significance Applicable Notional Register Criteria (Mark "x" in one or more boxes for the criteria qualifying the property for National Register listing) A Property is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history. B Property is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. _ill_ C Property embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components lack individual distinction. D Property has yielded, or is likely to yield information important in prehistory or history. Criteria Considerations (Mark "X" in all the boxes that apply.) A owned by a religious institution or used for religious purposes. B removed from its original location. C a birthplace or a grave. D a cemetery. E a reconstructed building, object or structure. F a commemorative property. G less than 50 years of age or achieved significance within the past 50 years. Areas of Significance Architecture; Art; Politics / Government Period of Significance I 850-1953 Significant Dates 1849-50 (competition); 1850-69 (construction) Significant Person Cultural Affiliation NIA Architect/Builder Thomas Crawford Randolph Rogers Narrative Statement of Significance (Explain the significance of the property on one or more continuation sheets.) 9. Major Bibliographical References Bibliography (Cite the books, articles, and other sources used in preparing this form on one or more continuation sheets.) Previous documentation on file (NPS) _ preliminary determination of individual listing (36 CFR 67) has been requested. _ previously listed in the National Register _ previously determined eligible by the National Register _ designated a National Historic Landmark _ recorded by Historic American Buildings Survey # _____ _ recorded by Historic American Engineering Record # _____ Primary Location of Additional Data _ X _ State Historic Preservation Office _ X _ Other State agency _Federal agency _ Local government _X _ University X Other Name of repository:----------------- NPS Form 10-900 0MB No. I02~018 (Rev. 10-90) U.S. Department of the Interior Virginia Washington Monument National Park Service Richmond, Virginia 10. Geographical Data Acreage of Property less than an acre UTM References (Place additional UTM references on a continua1ion sheet) Zone Easting Northing Zone Easting Northing I ~18~=2~84~9~0~7~4~1~57=2=6~4- 2 _______ 2________ _ 4 ______ Verbal Boundary Description (Describe the boundaries of the property on a continuation sheet.) The boundary consists of the statue itself as it stands within the entry drive of Capitol Square. Boundary Justification (Explain why the boundaries were selected on a continuation sheet.) 11. Form Prepared By name/title: Bryan Clark Green, Architectural Historian. With assistance from Charles Brownell, Professor of Art History, Virginia Commonwealth University. Organization: Virginia Department of Historic Resources date: 11/15/2002 street & number: 2801 Kensington Avenue telephone: (804)367-2323 xl 17 city or town: Richmond state: VA zip code: 23221 Additional Documentation Submit the following items with the completed form: Continuation Sheets Maps A USGS map (7.5 or 15 minute series) indicating the property's location. A sketch map for historic districts and properties having large acreage or numerous resources. Photographs Representative black and white photographs of the property. Additional items ( Check with the SHPO or FPO for any additional items) Pro ertv Owner name: Department of General Services, Commonwealth of Virginia street & number: 805 East Broad Street, Room 102 telephone: city or town: Richmond state: VA zipcode: 23219-1989 =======~--=========~----===============================~----====================--- Paperwork Reduction Act Statement: This information is being collected for applications to the National Register of Historic Places to nominate properties for listing or determine eligibility for listing, to list properties, and to amend existing listings. Response to this request is required to obtain a benefit m accordance with the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.). Estimated Burden Statement: Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average 18. J hours per response including the time for reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the form. Direct comments regarding this burden estimate or any aspect of this form to the Chief, Administrative Services Division, National Park Service, P .0. Box 37127, Washington, DC 20013-7127; and the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reductions Project (1024-0018), Washington, DC 20503. NPS Form 10-900 0MB No. 1024-4018 (Rev. I 0-90) U.S. Department of the Interior Virginia Washington Monument National Park Service Richmond, Virginia Section 7 Page 1 7. Summary Description: The Virginia Washington Monument in Virginia's Capitol Square originated with the Virginia General Assembly's establishment of a fund for a monument to Washington in 1817. At its unveiling on February 22, 1858, the statue became only the second equestrian statue of Washington ever dedicated. 1 It was instrumental in generating a national wave of representational memorial sculptures. The design consists of three tiers of pedestals, each
Load more

Recommended publications
  • X001132127.Pdf
    ' ' ., ,�- NONIMPORTATION AND THE SEARCH FOR ECONOMIC INDEPENDENCE IN VIRGINIA, 1765-1775 BRUCE ALLAN RAGSDALE Charlottesville, Virginia B.A., University of Virginia, 1974 M.A., University of Virginia, 1980 A Dissertation Presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Corcoran Department of History University of Virginia May 1985 © Copyright by Bruce Allan Ragsdale All Rights Reserved May 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction: 1 Chapter 1: Trade and Economic Development in Virginia, 1730-1775 13 Chapter 2: The Dilemma of the Great Planters 55 Chapter 3: An Imperial Crisis and the Origins of Commercial Resistance in Virginia 84 Chapter 4: The Nonimportation Association of 1769 and 1770 117 Chapter 5: The Slave Trade and Economic Reform 180 Chapter 6: Commercial Development and the Credit Crisis of 1772 218 Chapter 7: The Revival Of Commercial Resistance 275 Chapter 8: The Continental Association in Virginia 340 Bibliography: 397 Key to Abbreviations used in Endnotes WMQ William and Mary Quarterly VMHB Virginia Magazine of History and Biography Hening William Waller Hening, ed., The Statutes at Large; Being� Collection of all the Laws Qf Virginia, from the First Session of the Legislature in the year 1619, 13 vols. Journals of the House of Burgesses of Virginia Rev. Va. Revolutionary Virginia: The Road to Independence, 7 vols. LC Library of Congress PRO Public Record Office, London co Colonial Office UVA Manuscripts Department, Alderman Library, University of Virginia VHS Virginia Historical Society VSL Virginia State Library Introduction Three times in the decade before the Revolution. Vir­ ginians organized nonimportation associations as a protest against specific legislation from the British Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Chairman Volume 4 • Issue 3, 2017
    Notes FROM THE CHAIRMAN VOLUME 4 • ISSUE 3, 2017 INDEPENDENT SPIRIT • RELENTLESS DEDICATION 2017 has proven to be an exciting year for Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company. When I last reported to you, we were expecting to move our offices for the first time in 16 years, and changing our software platform for the first time in over 30 years. I am now pleased to report that both of these momentous changes were completed in May and June of this year, and the results are everything we had hoped and planned for – and more! (Read on >) IN THIS ISSUE 2 Letter from the Chairman 9 New Record Keeping Platform Escrow Agent Services 4 New Office 10 2017 New Transfer 5 Get to Know Our Team Agent Customers On-Demand Certificates 6 Who Is Keane, Inc.? 11 Continental Stock Transfer 7 Welcome to Our New Talent will be launching OTC Market Group’s Program 8 Hurricane Relief Shareholder Services Association 67309_NL.indd 1 10/17/17 12:17 PM LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN Our new offices at 1 State Street are state-of-the-art in every way. Our technology center and our mail facility have been expanded and enhanced significantly to meet the needs and expectations of our expanding customer base. In addition, our offices have breathtaking views of all of New York Harbor, as well as expanded state-of-the- art conference facilities. Please come visit! Likewise, we completed in June the long and arduous process of moving SunGard’s CSSII mainframe software system to TS Partners’ TranStar platform – a flexible and nimble web-based platform which offers enhanced customer and shareholder stock/equity solutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Historical Society, Adams Papers Editorial Project
    Narrative Section of a Successful Application The attached document contains the grant narrative of a previously funded grant application, which conforms to a past set of grant guidelines. It is not intended to serve as a model, but to give you a sense of how a successful application may be crafted. Every successful application is different, and each applicant is urged to prepare a proposal that reflects its unique project and aspirations. Prospective applicants should consult the application guidelines for instructions. Applicants are also strongly encouraged to consult with the NEH Division of Research Programs staff well before a grant deadline. Note: The attachment only contains the grant narrative, not the entire funded application. In addition, certain portions may have been redacted to protect the privacy interests of an individual and/or to protect confidential commercial and financial information and/or to protect copyrighted materials. Project Title: Adams Papers Editorial Project Institution: Massachusetts Historical Society Project Director: Sara Martin Grant Program: Scholarly Editions and Translations Program Statement of Significance and Impact The Adams Papers Editorial Project is sponsored by and located at the Massachusetts Historical Society (MHS). The Society’s 300,000-page Adams Family Papers manuscript collection, which spans more than a century of American history from the Revolutionary era to the last quarter of the nineteenth century, is consulted during the entire editing process, making the project unique among large-scale documentary editions. The Adams Papers has published 52 volumes to date and will continue to produce one volume per year. Free online access is provided by the MHS and the National Archives.
    [Show full text]
  • Getting to Know George Washington
    getting to know A view of the completed figure of the 19-year-old Washington. George WashingtonBy Jeffrey H. Schwartz n the spring of 2003, I found myself learning more Iabout our country’s first president and 18th century art, clothing, and dentistry than I ever dreamed likely. But there I was one day in April, sitting with Laura Fisher, executive director of French and Indian War 250, who was asking me if Figure 1. Bust of George Washington. I thought I could reconstruct a life-like replica of Images courtesy of Jeffrey H. Schwartz. George Washington in 1754. 52 WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA HISTORY | SPRING 2010 WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA HISTORY | SPRING 2010 53 A view of the completed figure of the 45-year-old That would be when he was 22 years old, a course I said I would take on the project, not hairline) and produced a terracotta bust— Washington on his horse Blueskin. junior officer in the English militia stationed in only because it meant reconstructing George the face of which, I later figured out, must Western Pennsylvania. I had been working for Washington but also because it would the have been a replica of the life mask. He also some 20 years as the forensic anthropologist first time anyone tried to de-age an individual took body measurements for a marble statue with the Coroner’s (now Medical Examiner’s) without the aid of photographs and image- (Figure 1) that he sculpted upon his return Office of Allegheny County, which is how manipulating computer software. Only after to Paris that is so detailed one can see seams Laura found me.
    [Show full text]
  • RESIDENT MANUAL July 1, 2020
    THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND HEALTH SCIENCES OFFICE OF GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION *RESIDENT MANUAL July 1, 2020 The information in this Manual is designed to provide a reference for many of the questions you may have during your education as you become involved in patient care. If an answer is not found here, you are encouraged to call the service in question and to consult the institutional Standard Practices available at each hospital or medical institution. Many policies are also found in "Rules and Regulations of the Medical and Dental Staff" and in "Bylaws of the Medical and Dental Staff" of each hospital. We suggest you contact the GME Office, your Program Director, a member of the Housestaff Council or your Chief Resident(s) for clarification and additional information. The Resident Manual is also available on the Graduate Medical Education website: http://smhs.gwu.edu/academics/gme/about/residentmanual. The GWU School of Medicine and Health Sciences (SMHS) will make reasonable efforts to notify Residents of any material changes in the Resident Manual. The SMHS’s current notice practice is to e-mail changes to the Resident Manual to the Resident’s University e-mail address maintained by the Office of Graduate Medical Education. It is the Resident Physician's responsibility to monitor his or her University email account for information on any changes. * Throughout this Manual, the word “resident” refers to all specialty and subspecialty residents. Table of Contents I. MISSION and VISION 5 ACGME COMPETENCIES 6 CLINICAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENT REVIEW (CLER) 7 EVALUATION 8 RESIDENT OBLIGATIONS 10 WELLNESS IN THE SMHS COMMUNITY 12 II.
    [Show full text]
  • CV, James D. Nelson
    JAMES D. NELSON University of Houston Law Center 100 Law Center, Houston, TX 77204-6060 (713) 743-0526 [email protected] ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON LAW CENTER, Houston, TX Vinson & Elkins Professor, 2021 – present Associate Professor of Law and Business (with tenure), 2020 – 2021 Assistant Professor of Law, 2015 – 2020 All-University Award for Excellence in Research and Scholarship, 2020 All-University Teaching Excellence Award, 2019 Professor of the Year, Order of the Barons, 2018 – 2019 COLUMBIA LAW SCHOOL, New York, NY Postdoctoral Fellow in Corporate Governance, 2014 – 2015 Fellow, Millstein Center for Global Markets and Corporate Ownership, 2014 – 2015 Editor-at-Large, Columbia Law School Blog on Corporations and Capital Markets, 2014 Associate-in-Law, Postdoctoral Research Scholar, and Lecturer-in-Law, 2012 – 2014 HARVARD LAW SCHOOL, Cambridge, MA Research Director, Project on Corporate Political Spending, Fall 2015 EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA SCHOOL OF LAW, Charlottesville, VA J.D., May 2009 Editor-in-Chief, Virginia Law Review Roger and Madeleine Traynor Prize (graduation award for best written work) Robert E. Goldsten Award for Distinction in the Classroom Order of the Coif UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA, Charlottesville, VA B.A., Government and Political Philosophy, Policy, and Law (PPL), with high distinction, May 2006 Jefferson Scholar (full merit scholarship) Echols Scholar (honors program) Lawn Resident PUBLICATIONS The Religious Conversion of Corporate Social Responsibility, 70 EMORY LAW JOURNAL (forthcoming 2021) (with Elizabeth Sepper) Some Realism about Corporate Crime, 83 LAW & CONTEMPORARY PROBLEMS 113 (2020) The Untenable Case for Keeping Investors in the Dark, 10 HARVARD BUSINESS LAW REVIEW 1 (2020) (with Lucian Bebchuk, Robert J.
    [Show full text]
  • The British Surrender Their Armies to General Washington After Their Defeat at Your Town in Virginia, Octorber 1781
    Library of Congress Figure 1: The British surrender their Armies to General Washington after their defeat at Your Town in Virginia, Octorber 1781. 48 ARLINGTON 1-IISTORICA L MAGAZINE The Arlington House Engravings of the British Surrender at Yorktown: Too Often Overlooked? BY DEAN A. DEROSA In the morning room and in the second-floor hall ofArlington House, The Robert E. Lee Memorial (the US National Park Service historical site on the grounds ofArlington National Cemetery), hang two framed engravings, entitled "The British Surrendering their Arms to Gen. Washington after their Defeat at Yorktown in Virginia, October 1781." The two art pieces, first published in 1819, are drawn by John Francis Renault and engraved by Tanner, Vallance, Kearny & Co. The morning room engraving is in color, while the second floor engraving is inscribed in black ink (Figure 1). The caption at the base of the two engravings reads, "To the defenders of American independence, this print is most respectfully inscribed by their fellow citizen, Jn. Fcis. Renault, assistant secretary to the Count de Grass, and engineer to the French Army, at the siege of York." Thus, the twin engravings are drawn by a participant in the Siege of Yorktown, if not also a witness to the historic British surrender and subsequent surrender ceremony, which for all intents and purposes ended major hostilities during the American Revolution. The allegorical background of the engravings depicts not only the field upon which the British, Continental, and French armies stood during the sur­ render ceremony, but also a number of classical images and symbols of human discord, victory, and liberty, described in an 1804 prospectus apparently in reference to an early, circa 1810-1815 version of the Renault drawing (Figure 2) upon which the published engraving would eventually be based, that are largely lost upon us today.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nelson Family and Commercial Resistance in Yorktown, Virginia 1769-1771
    W&M ScholarWorks Undergraduate Honors Theses Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 7-2012 "The Spirit of Association": The Nelson Family and Commercial Resistance in Yorktown, Virginia 1769-1771 Eric F. Ames College of William and Mary Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Ames, Eric F., ""The Spirit of Association": The Nelson Family and Commercial Resistance in Yorktown, Virginia 1769-1771" (2012). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 478. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses/478 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “THE SPIRIT OF ASSOCIATION”: THE NELSON FAMILY AND COMMERCIAL RESISTANCE IN YORKTOWN, VIRGINIA 1769-1771 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts with Honors in History from the College of William and Mary in Virginia, by Eric F. Ames Accepted For____________________ _________________________ Director ________________________________ ________________________________ Acknowledgments I would first like to acknowledge my adviser, Prof. Julie Richter, for her assistance and guidance on this project, and for providing feedback on the drafts of this thesis. I would also like to thank Profs. Paul S. Davies and Scott R. Nelson for agreeing to sit on the committee that assessed this thesis. I would like to also acknowledge my family, as well as countless other members of the Tribe who contributed their patience and support during the duration of this project.
    [Show full text]
  • George Washington Nelson Katarina Wonders
    Prisoner of War: George Washington Nelson Katarina Wonders George Washington Nelson, affectionately known as Wash, was the nephew of Long Branch Plantation owners Hugh M. and Adelaide Nelson, a University of Virginia alumnus, and a Captain in the Confederate Army. Additionally, he was also one of many men captured and imprisoned during the Civil War. George and his companion Thomas Randolph were captured by Union soldiers on October 26th, 1863 in Millwood, VA while eating dinner.1 This domestic capture was the first of many oddities during George’s time as a Prisoner of War, since most soldiers were typically captured during, or as a result of, battle. George’s experiences as a POW demonstrate the common sufferings of men in Union prisons, while also allowing for a unique comparison between locations, as most prisoners did not move around nearly as much as George. Recounting his experiences as a POW, George wrote a brief narrative just over 10 years after his exchange on June 13th, 1865. The first night of his imprisonment was spent at Nineveh, Virginia under Captain Bailey. Wash makes a special note to credit Bailey for his immense kindness during their short period of time together. In Nineveh, the Captain lent George his gloves, and in Strasburg the next evening, Bailey gave the men a “first-rate supper” and tobacco before handing them off to the next set of Union men in Harper’s Ferry.2 The night spent in the “John Brown Engine House” was the first of Wash’s experience in a Union prison. He describes it as having “no beds, no seats, and the floor and walls were alive with lice.”3 After that night, the men were sent to Wheeling, West Virginia, where they found relatively nicer living conditions, but were soon sent to Camp Chase in Ohio only two or three nights later.
    [Show full text]
  • Founding Fathers" in American History Dissertations
    EVOLVING OUR HEROES: AN ANALYSIS OF FOUNDERS AND "FOUNDING FATHERS" IN AMERICAN HISTORY DISSERTATIONS John M. Stawicki A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS December 2019 Committee: Andrew Schocket, Advisor Ruth Herndon Scott Martin © 2019 John Stawicki All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Andrew Schocket, Advisor This thesis studies scholarly memory of the American founders and “Founding Fathers” via inclusion in American dissertations. Using eighty-one semi-randomly and diversely selected founders as case subjects to examine and trace how individual, group, and collective founder interest evolved over time, this thesis uniquely analyzes 20th and 21st Century Revolutionary American scholarship on the founders by dividing it five distinct periods, with the most recent period coinciding with “founders chic.” Using data analysis and topic modeling, this thesis engages three primary historiographic questions: What founders are most prevalent in Revolutionary scholarship? Are social, cultural, and “from below” histories increasing? And if said histories are increasing, are the “New Founders,” individuals only recently considered vital to the era, posited by these histories outnumbering the Top Seven Founders (George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, Benjamin Franklin, and Thomas Paine) in founder scholarship? The thesis concludes that the Top Seven Founders have always dominated founder dissertation scholarship, that social, cultural, and “from below” histories are increasing, and that social categorical and “New Founder” histories are steadily increasing as Top Seven Founder studies are slowly decreasing, trends that may shift the Revolutionary America field away from the Top Seven Founders in future years, but is not yet significantly doing so.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT Title of Document: VISUALIZING AMERICAN
    ABSTRACT Title of Document: VISUALIZING AMERICAN HISTORY AND IDENTITY IN THE ELLEN PHILLIPS SAMUEL MEMORIAL Abby Rebecca Eron, Master of Arts, 2014 Directed By: Professor Renée Ater, Department of Art History and Archaeology In her will, Philadelphia philanthropist Ellen Phillips Samuel designated $500,000 to the Fairmount Park Art Association “for the erection of statuary on the banks of the Schuylkill River … emblematic of the history of America from the time of the earliest settlers to the present.” The initial phase of the resulting sculpture project – the Central Terrace of the Samuel Memorial – should be considered one of the fullest realizations of New Deal sculpture. It in many ways corresponds (conceptually, thematically, and stylistically) with the simultaneously developing art programs of the federal government. Analyzing the Memorial project highlights some of the tensions underlying New Deal public art, such as the difficulties of visualizing American identity and history, as well as the complexities involved in the process of commissioning artwork intended to fulfill certain programmatic purposes while also allowing for a level of individual artists’ creative expression. VISUALIZING AMERICAN HISTORY AND IDENTITY IN THE ELLEN PHILLIPS SAMUEL MEMORIAL By Abby Rebecca Eron Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts 2014 Advisory Committee: Professor Renée Ater, Chair Professor Meredith J. Gill Professor Steven A. Mansbach © Copyright by Abby Rebecca Eron 2014 The thesis or dissertation document that follows has had referenced material removed in respect for the owner's copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form MAR 2 9 2001
    DPI Form 10-800-b IJai M871 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form MAR 2 9 2001 A. Name of Multiple Property listing & EDUCATION iMFlGNAl PARK SERVICE Outdoor Sculpture of Rhode Island, 1851-prea^nt B. Associated Historic Contexts Outdoor Sculpture of Rhode Island, 1851-present C. Geographical Data The State of Rhode Island See continuation sheet D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I herehy certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 86 CF.H Part 60 and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Planning and Evaluation. i Signature of certifying official Date 3 ^Xf State or Federal agency and bureau I hereby certify that this multiple property documentation form has been approved by the National Register as a basis for evaluating related properties for listing in the National Register. S////0/ Date Property name Outdoor Sculpture of Rhode Island, 1851-present E. Statement of Historic Contexts See continuation sheet F. Associated Property Types See continuation sheet G. Summary of Identification and Evaluation Methods X^ See continuation sheet H. Major Bibliographical References X See continuation sheet Primary location of additional documentation: X State historic preservation office _ Other state agency _ Federal agency _ Local government _ University _ Other Specify repository: L Form Prepared By Name/Title: Ronald J.
    [Show full text]