Technology, Globalization, and Sustainable Development

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Technology, Globalization, and Sustainable Development TECHNOLOGY, GLOBALIZATION, AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT Transforming the Industrial State NICHOLAS A. ASHFORD RALPH P. HALL New Haven & London —-1 —0 —+1 561-45401_ch00_8P.indd iii 6/23/11 9:47 AM I The Multidimensional Concept of Sustainability In Part I of this book we discuss the nature (Chapter one issue, such as climate change, or even a small 1) and evolution (Chapter 2) of the multidimensional group of concerns will limit options and ignore oppor- concepts of sustainability and sustainable develop- tunities to develop cross-cutting approaches to address ment. unsustainable trends in a comprehensive manner. Chapter 1 begins by exploring two central compo- Chapter 2 provides a brief historical context for nents of sustainable development— meeting basic hu- the ideas and themes discussed in Chapter 1. It iden- man needs and equality, which are discussed in the tifi es a number of important texts, national and in- context of governance. We then consider the current ternational events, and U.S. regulations from 1951 to economic growth model and the importance given to 2009 that helped shape the current and continually technological innovation as the key to solving the sus- evolving notion of sustainable development. An ex- tainability challenge. The chapter ends by highlighting panded version of Chapter 2 is provided in the Primer several critical issues that we argue must be included on the Emergence of Sustainable Development found in future development strategies. A narrow focus on on the website associated with this work. —-1 —0 —+1 561-45401_ch01_8P.indd 17 6/23/11 9:49 AM 1 Concern for a Global Future 1.1 Human Needs 20 1.4 A Conceptual Framework for Sustainable Development 88 1.1.1 The Mea sure ment of (Human) Development 22 1.5 The Eu ro pe an Union’s Strategy for Sustainable Development: 1.1.2 Consumption and Well- Being 33 The Lisbon Strategy and Eu rope 2020 97 1.1.3 Employment 35 1.6 The Reformulation of Sustainable Development as a Problem of 1.1.4 Human Needs and Sustainability 54 Global Climate Change 100 1.2 Social Justice, In e qual ity, and the Social Contract between the 1.7 Broadening Our Awareness of Tipping Points 101 Governed and the Government 56 1.2.1 The Social Contract and the Theory of Justice 56 1.8 The 2008 Financial Crisis and Opportunities for 1.2.2 Operationalizing the Social Contract 61 Reconceptualization of the Growth Paradigm 102 1.2.3 Equality of What? 69 1.9 The Necessity of Solving Problems on a Comprehensive 1.3 Living beyond Our Ecological Means: The Technology Basis 105 Debate 73 1.10 Notes 105 1.3.1 Growth, Technology, and Substitution versus a Steady- 1.11 Additional Readings 106 State Economy 77 1.12 References 106 1.3.2 The Environment and Affl uence: The Environmental Kuznets Curve 80 1.3.3 Technological Optimism 86 t the beginning of the twenty- fi rst cen- sustenance requirements. Telecommunications sys- tury, the world might have been described tems have enabled friends, families, businesses, orga- as one of signifi cant technological prog- nizations, and governments to communicate verbally ress, industrialization, and globalization. and visually across thousands of miles. Combine Our current standard of living is based these technologies with our modern transportation Aon many drivers of modern progress. In developed systems, and we remove the notion of the frontier. nations, energy systems supply power to our homes, Having achieved such progress, why should we places of work, and general environment. When we now be concerned about the future of humankind on become ill, we fi nd an abundance of modern drugs a global scale? One answer is that just over 1 billion that can ease or cure our suffering, maintaining or people have any meaningful access to the resources improving our physical and emotional well- being. and quality of life described above. The rest of the Global fi nancial and commodity markets provide tril- world’s population—some 5 billion people who live lions of dollars a day to supply our investment and in less developed regions—have only a taste of what consumption needs. The agricultural sector, through this standard of living might be like (Durning 1992, mechanization and other technological and biolog- 1994; UNDP 2003). Second, even within the devel- ical advances, has been able to supply our growing oped countries, many people do not have access to —-1 —0 —+1 561-45401_ch01_8P.indd 19 6/23/11 9:49 AM Technology, Globalization, and Sustainable Development 20 an adequate supply of essential goods, ser vices, hous- rapid technological change, which are mutually rein- ing, health care, and other necessities. As a result of forcing and create a set of conditions that shortens the fi nancial crisis of 2008, a signifi cant number of the necessary response time for policy, restricts na- people in the developed world are losing their homes tional policy options, and possibly exacerbates dis- and/or their jobs. Energy supply and use in the face tributional in e qual ity and ecological damage. This of both the uncertainty of future availability and chapter sets out these concerns. global climate disruption are increasingly becoming serious concerns. In e qual ity is leading toward a world 1.1 HUMAN NEEDS of growing disparity both between industrialized and developing nations and among different segments of The major problems of the world today can be the population within those countries. In effect, the solved only if we improve our understanding of communities of less developed regions and poor ar- human behavior. Skinner, About Behaviorism, 1974 eas are held captive to the needs and wants of those who are well- off in industrialized (and some in indus- During the mid-1970s, the idea that the purpose of trializing) nations, whose living and consuming hab- development was to develop things (for example, to its are in many ways condemning billions of people to transform resources into commodities/products) was a lower (material) quality of life. Put simply, if each rejected and redefi ned to focus development on sat- member of the global community were to live the isfying the needs of humankind. lifestyle of the average U.S. or U.K. citizen, holding In 1973, Schumacher published Small Is Beautiful, technology constant, we would need the resources of which challenged the prevailing patterns of develop- somewhere between 1.5 and 8 planet Earths (McLaren, ment and approach to global economics. Schumacher Bullock, et al. 1997; Wilson 2002; WWF 2006). It is (1999, p. 139) rejected the idea that what “is best for clear that a global drive to reach the Westernized view the rich must be best for the poor” and redefi ned the of the good life, without a drastic change in production conventional view of development toward human pro cesses and consumption patterns, will soon bring needs. “Development does not start with goods; it us up against ecological and physical limits and force starts with people and their education, or ga niza tion, us to rethink what we mean by a secure and fulfi lling and discipline. Without these three, all resources re- lifestyle. main latent, untapped, potential” (ibid.). These introductory paragraphs present a highly A year later, the Cocoyoc Declaration built on the simplifi ed view of the world, and there is clearly a ideas of Schumacher and placed basic human needs continuum of positions between those presented. at the center of development efforts, stating that The central argument of this book is that if we are “any pro cess of growth that does not lead to their interested in the well- being of current and future fulfi lment— or, even worse, disrupts them— is a trav- 1 generations, we not only should be concerned for the esty of the idea of development.” * The following year future of the world but also should be actively search- the Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation (1975) articu- ing for new ways to enable individuals, communities, lated a similar position on the objective of develop- and nations to live a sustainable life, what might be ment in What Now: Another Development. It called called a sustainable livelihood. If present trends con- for the “development of every man and woman—of tinue and the structural forces driving them remain substantially unchanged, there is a strong possibility * The infl uence of Schumacher’s work is clearly evident that within a few generations the world will be inca- throughout the Cocoyoc Declaration. Schumacher’s call for a pable of sustaining the human population at an ade- “metaphysical reconstruction” (Schumacher 1999, p. xi)—the quate level of material well- being and health, and need to reconstruct the meaning of ideas such as development, economics, knowledge, wealth, employment, and technology— is that it will lack suffi cient and equitable opportunities present in the Cocoyoc Declaration’s redefi nition of develop- for the realization of human potential. These trends ment in terms of self- reliance. Like Schumacher, the declaration include per sis tent (and often growing) inequalities rejects economic development that maintains or increases the between and within nations (including the United disparities between and within countries and argues for eco- nomic growth that benefi ts the poorest sections of each society. States) and persuasive evidence that we are living Further, the declaration also rejects what might be called the beyond our ecological and physical means. “developed-nation model” in favor of development that supports Further, the social and po liti cal environment in a nation- state’s societal and cultural norms. In this sense, the declaration asks the international community to respect the di- which policy responses to these trends must be made versity of each country and to accept that there is more than one -1— is a diffi cult one.
Recommended publications
  • Measuring What Matters?
    Measuring what matters? Exploring the use of values-based indicators in assessing Education for Sustainability Ashley Jay Brockwell Thesis committee Promotor Prof. Dr A.E.J. (Arjen) Wals Professor of Transformative Learning for Socio-Ecological Sustainability Wageningen University & Research Co-promotors Dr P. (Peter) Tamas, Biometris, Wageningen University & Research Prof. Dr M.K. (Marie) Harder, Professor of Sustainable Waste Management, University of Brighton, UK Other members Prof. Dr Arnold K. Bregt, Wageningen Univerity Dr. Jonas Lysgard, Aarhus University, Denmark Prof. Dr Maik Adomssent, Leuphana University, Germany Prof. Dr Frank P.C.M. de Jong, Open University, The Netherlands This research was conducted under the auspices of Wageningen School of Social Sciences (WASS). 2 Measuring what matters? Exploring the use of values-based indicators in assessing Education for Sustainability Ashley Jay Brockwell Thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of doctor at Wageningen University by the authority of the Rector Magnificus Prof. Dr A.P.J. Mol, in the presence of the Thesis Committee appointed by the Academic Board to be defended in public on Tuesday 28 May 2019 at 1100 in the Aula. 3 Ashley Jay Brockwell Measuring what matters? Exploring the use of values-based indicators in assessing Education for Sustainability 243 Pages PhD thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, NL (2019) With references, with summary in English ISBN: 978-94-6343-956-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18174/476056 4 Acknowledgements First of all, I would like to thank Marie Harder, founder and head of the Values and Sustainability Research Group at the University of Brighton and China Thousand Talents Professor at Fudan University, Shanghai, without whom this endeavour would never have been started.
    [Show full text]
  • The Global One Health Environment
    South Eastern European Journal of Public Health Special Volume 2021, 1st Edition The Global One Health Environment A Learning Module edited by 1HOPE-GPA (Governance, Policy, Advocacy) Jacobs Verlag Executive Editor Genc Burazeri CAPHRI, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands. Email: [email protected] or: [email protected] Skype: genc.burazeri Assistant Executive Editor Kreshnik Petrela Email: [email protected] Assistant Section Editor Ines Siepmann Email: [email protected] Technical Editor Meri Roshi Email: [email protected] Board of Editors Jürgen Breckenkamp, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bielefeld, Germany (2016). Kasia Czabanowska, CAPHRI, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands (2020); Section Editor, Women in Health Leadership. Genc Burazeri, Founding Editor, CAPHRI, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands (2013). Jens Holst, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Applied Sciences, Fulda, Germany (2018). Ulrich Laaser, Founding Editor, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Bielefeld, Germany (2013). Kai Michelsen, Fulda University of Applied Sciences (Department for Nursing and Health) in Hesse, Germany. Jose Martin-Moreno, School of Public Health, Valencia, Spain (2013). Peter Schröder-Bäck, University of Applied Sciences for Police and Public Administration in North Rhine-Westphalia, Campus
    [Show full text]
  • Kestävä Kehitys Globaalin Ajan Hyvinvointiyhteiskunnan Haasteena
    Tutkimuksia 318 Arto O. Salonen Kestävä kehitys globaalin ajan hyvinvointiyhteiskunnan haasteena Esitetään julkisesti tarkastettavaksi Helsingin yliopiston käyttäytymistieteellisen tiedekunnan suostumuksella Helsingin yliopiston päärakennuksen salissa nro 5, Fabianinkatu 33, perjantaina 12.11.2010 klo 12. Helsinki 2010 Esitarkastajat: Professori Tuula Keinonen Itä-Suomen yliopisto Dosentti Irmeli Palmberg Åbo Akademi Kustos: Professori Mauri Åhlberg Helsingin yliopisto Vastaväittäjä: Dosentti Eila Jeronen Oulun yliopisto ISBN 978-952-10-6534-7 (nid.) ISBN 978-952-10-6535-4 (PDF) ISSN 1799-2508 Yliopistopaino 2010 Helsingin yliopisto Käyttäytymistieteellinen tiedekunta Opettajankoulutuslaitos Tutkimuksia 318 ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. Arto O. Salonen Kestävä kehitys globaalin ajan hyvinvointiyhteiskunnan haasteena ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. Tiivistelmä Tässä väitöstutkimuksessa tarkastelun kohteena on ihmisen arkinen toiminta suomalaisessa kulttuurisessa kehyksessä globaalissa ajassa. Määrittelen kansainvälisen nykykäsityksen mukai- sen kokonaisvaltaisen kestävän kehityksen konseptin ja analysoin kestävän kehityksen mukaista ihmisen arjen rakentumista ja sen vaihtelua eri ryhmien välillä. Laadin tutkimukseni viitekehyk- seksi kestävän kehityksen mukaisen käyttäytymisen rakentumisen mallin, missä arki rakentuu henkilökohtaisten sisäisten ja yhteiskunnallisten ulkoisten
    [Show full text]
  • Peter Blaze Corcoran
    PETER BLAZE CORCORAN College of Arts and Sciences Florida Gulf Coast University Fort Myers, Florida 33965-6565 Office Telephone: (239) 590-7166 Office Facsimile: (239) 590-7200 Electronic Mail: [email protected] Academic Experience Academic Field: Science and Environmental Education Academic Programs: Ed.D., University of Maine, 1985, Orono, Maine M.Ed., University of Maine, 1981, Orono, Maine A.B., Antioch College, 1972, Yellow Springs, Ohio Academic Honors: Phi Kappa Phi Professional Experience University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya 2013-2014 Fulbright Grantee. I was awarded a Fulbright Fellowship for the 2013-2014 academic year at University of Nairobi in Nairobi, Kenya. Starting in September 2013, I will assist the Wangari Maathai Institute for Peace and Environmental Studies (WMI) in realizing its mission and in achieving its strategic intent. This work will entail researching and writing an educational program for their consideration. The project will also include developing models of both academic programs and community environmental education programs and disseminating information about them. Specifically, the Institute has asked me to provide research assistance in advancing a draft for its recently approved Ph.D. program in Environmental Management and Governance, and in developing a master’s degree. I will also work to advance an international, intergenerational, informal network of centers of which FGCU is the secretariat. This work will be done in coordination with the United Nations Environment Programme headquartered in Nairobi. Florida Gulf Coast University, Fort Myers, Florida 1997-Present Professor of Environmental Studies and Environmental Education, College of Arts and Sciences, and Director of the Center for Environmental and Sustainability Education.
    [Show full text]
  • The Earth Charter Through the Lenses of Sustainability Justice O Kαταστατικός Χάρτης Της Γης Μέσα Α
    9th International Conference in Open & Distance Learning - November 2017, Athens, Greece - PROCEEDINGS The Earth Charter through the Lenses of Sustainability Justice O Kαταστατικός Χάρτης της Γης μέσα από την Οπτική της Βιώσιμης Δικαιοσύνης Nelly Kostoulas-Makrakis Associate Professor of Teaching Methodology and Education for Sustainable Development Dept. of Primary Education University of Crete, Greece [email protected] Abstract The Earth Charter, the product of a worldwide, decade long, cross-cultural dialogue on common goals and shared values, is a vision and declaration of fundamental ethical principles for building a just, sustainable and peaceful global society in the 21st century. For almost two decades, the Earth Charter initiative has evolved to set forth fundamental principles for a sustainable way of life in an inclusive way. This paper attempts to connect the Earth Charter with the notion of sustainability justice. It has been found that all the four dimensions of sustainability justice, namely: social justice, environmental justice, economic justice and cultural justice are reflected upon the whole Earth Charter document and are related with its underlying vision. Keywords: Earth Charter, sustainability justice, ESD, transformative learning Περίληψη Ο Καταστατικός Χάρτης της Γης, προϊόν ενός παγκόσμιου δεκαετούς διαπολιτισμικού διαλόγου πάνω σε κοινούς στόχους και αξίες, είναι ένα όραμα και μια διακήρυξη ηθικών αρχών για την οικοδόμηση μιας δίκαιης, βιώσιμης και ειρηνικής παγκόσμιας κοινωνίας για τον 21ο αιώνα. Η πρωτοβουλία του Καταστατικού Χάρτη της Γης, για δύο σχεδόν δεκαετίες έθεσε τις βασικές αρχές για ένα βιώσιμο τρόπο ζωής με έναν ολιστικό τρόπο. Η παρούσα εργασία επιχειρεί να συνδέσει τον Καταστατικό Χάρτη της Γης με την έννοια της βιώσιμης δικαιοσύνης.
    [Show full text]
  • Rev. 4/25/11 “Earth Charter Ethics and Finding Meaning in an Evolving Universe” Steven C. Rockefeller Yale University 24 –
    Rev. 4/25/11 “Earth Charter Ethics and Finding Meaning in an Evolving Universe” Steven C. Rockefeller Yale University 24 – 26 March 2011 At the outset I would like to extend my personal congratulations to Mary Evelyn Tucker, John Grim and Brian Swimme on “The Journey of the Universe” film and book, which will become a deeply inspiring educational resource in support of the transition to a sustainable future. All of us associated with the Earth Charter Initiative are profoundly grateful to Mary Evelyn for her extraordinary leadership in support of the drafting and promotion of the Earth Charter. As a member of the drafting committee, Mary Evelyn played an especially important role in helping to craft language for the Preamble that sets the Earth Charter’s ethical vision in the context of an evolving universe. Further, she has always seen the need for a new global ethic as one important implication of the Universe Story as it relates to humanity’s role as a member of the community of life on Earth. Eric Chaisson, who with Mary Evelyn was part of the first Earth Charter drafting committee meeting in January 1997, also shares this outlook and his views had an important influence on the language that is used in the Preamble. I also would like to recognize that in addition to Mary Evelyn and Eric a number of you attending this conference contributed to the drafting process and have supported and used the Earth Charter in many different ways, and I would like to take this opportunity to thank you.
    [Show full text]
  • Earth Charter Values and Principles for a Sustainable Future
    The Earth Charter Values and Principles for a Sustainable Future Why is the Earth Charter important? and development of the document reflects the progress of the worldwide dialogue on the Earth At a time when major changes in how we think Charter. Beginning with the Benchmark Draft and live are urgently needed, the Earth Charter issued by the Commission following the Rio+5 challenges us to examine our values and to Forum in Rio de Janeiro, drafts of the Earth choose a better way. It calls on us to search for Charter were circulated internationally as part of common ground in the midst of our diversity and the consultation process. Meeting at the to embrace a new ethical vision that is shared by UNESCO Headquarters in Paris in March, 2000, growing numbers of people in many nations and the Commission approved a final version of the cultures throughout the world. Earth Charter. What is the history of the Earth What are the sources of Earth Charter? Charter values? In 1987 the United Nations World Commission on Together with the Earth Charter consultation Environment and Development issued a call for process, the most important influences shaping creation of a new charter that would set forth fun- the ideas and values in the Earth Charter are con- damental principles for sustainable development. temporary science, international law, the teach- The drafting of an Earth Charter was part of the he Earth Charter is a ings of indigenous peoples, the wisdom of the unfinished business of the 1992 Rio Earth world’s great religions and philosophical tradi- Tdeclaration of fundamental Summit.
    [Show full text]
  • Earthcharter.Org
    Journal of Education for Sustainable Development http://jsd.sagepub.com/ The Earth Charter Goes Interactive and Live with e-GLO : Using New Media to Train Youth Leaders in Sustainability on Both Sides of the Digital Divide Mike Sheehan and Jaana Laitinen Journal of Education for Sustainable Development 2010 4: 253 DOI: 10.1177/097340821000400213 The online version of this article can be found at: http://jsd.sagepub.com/content/4/2/253 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com On behalf of: Centre For Environment Education Additional services and information for Journal of Education for Sustainable Development can be found at: Email Alerts: http://jsd.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://jsd.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav >> Version of Record - Sep 14, 2010 What is This? Downloaded from jsd.sagepub.com by guest on January 23, 2012 DESCRIPTIVE REPORTS Copyright © 2010 SAGE Publications (Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore and Washington DC) www.sagepublications.com Vol 4(2): 253–258 10.1177/097340821000400213 The Earth Charter Goes Interactive and Live with e-GLO Using New Media to Train Youth Leaders in Sustainability on Both Sides of the Digital Divide MIKE SHEEHAN and JAANA LAITINEN Abstract For ten years now the Earth Charter has been inspiring global citizens to engage in conversations and actions that benefi t everybody. This article describes e-GLO, the Earth Charter Global Learning Opportunity, the Earth Charter International’s semester-long, online leadership course inspired by the Earth Charter. It is developed and implemented in collaboration with BeatBoard Education and Training and Heart in Action Enterprises.
    [Show full text]
  • Manifesto the Earth Charter Preamble
    THE EARTH CHARTER CITIES MANIFESTO THE EARTH CHARTER PREAMBLE We stand at a critical moment in Earth’s history, a time when humanity must choose its future. As the world becomes increasingly interdependent and fragile, the future at once holds great peril and great promise. To move forward, we must recognize that in the midst of a magnificent diversity of cultures and life forms we are one human family and one Earth community with a common destiny. We must join together to bring forth a sustainable global society founded on respect for nature, universal human rights, economic justice, and a culture of peace. Towards this end, it is imperative that we, the peoples of Earth, declare our responsibility to one another, to the greater community of life, and to future generations. Earth, Our Home Humanity is part of a vast evolving universe. Earth, our home, is alive with a unique community of life. The forces of nature make existence a demanding and uncertain adventure, but Earth has provided the conditions essential to life’s evolution. The resilience of the community of life and the well-being of humanity depend upon preserving a healthy biosphere with all its ecological systems, a rich variety of plants and animals, fertile soils, pure waters, and clean air. The global environment with its finite resources is a common concern of all peoples. The protection of Earth’s vitality, diversity, and beauty is a sacred trust. - Excerpt from the Earth Charter (2000) 2 CITIES AS ENGINES OF THE ECONOMY In this document we refer to Earth Charter Cities as cities of any size whose governing institutions have adopted the Earth Charter and are putting it into practice in a coherent way.
    [Show full text]
  • Earth Jurisprudence: the Moral Value of Nature
    Pace Environmental Law Review Volume 25 Issue 2 Summer 2008 Article 1 June 2008 Earth Jurisprudence: The Moral Value of Nature Judith E. Koons Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/pelr Recommended Citation Judith E. Koons, Earth Jurisprudence: The Moral Value of Nature, 25 Pace Envtl. L. Rev. 263 (2008) Available at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/pelr/vol25/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at DigitalCommons@Pace. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pace Environmental Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Pace. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PACE ENVIRONMENTAL LAW REVIEW Volume 25 Summer 2008 Number 2 ARTICLES Earth Jurisprudence: The Moral Value of Nature JUDITH E. KOONS* There are times in our lives, particularlyas we grow older, when the long arm of the horizon becomes our teacher.1 I. INTRODUCTION Earth Jurisprudence is an emerging field of law that calls us to pause as we enter the twenty-first century to consider the ground under our feet and the teachings bearing down on us from the horizon. 2 As planetary environmental crises advance toward * Associate Professor of Law, Barry University School of Law, Orlando, Florida. B.A., J.D., University of Florida, M.T.S., Harvard Divinity School. Copyright, Judith E. Koons, 2007. I offer my gratitude to Thomas Berry for his long life of soulful work and natural wisdom; to Sr. Pat Siemen, O.P., J.D., for her devotion to the call to "wear out rather than rust out"; to Julie Perry for her passionate and talented research assistance; to Pat Tolan and Eric Hull for their helpful comments; to the many ear- nest thinkers whose work graces this article; and to Earth for continuing to count us among her own.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Transition: the Promise and Lure of the Times Ahead
    Great Transition The planetary phase of history has begun, its ultimate shape profoundly uncertain. Will global development veer toward a world of impoverished people, cultures and nature? Or will there be a Great Transition toward a future of enriched lives, human solidarity and environmental sustainability? Though perhaps improbable, such a shift is still possible. The essay examines the historic roots of this fateful crossroads for world Great Transition development, and scans different scenarios that can emerge from contempo- The Promise and Lure of the Times Ahead rary forces and contradictions. This work of engagement as well as analysis points to strategies, values and choices for advancing a Great Transition. The book synthesizes the insights of the Global Scenario Group. Convened RASKIN • BANURI • GALLOPÍN • GUTMAN • HAMMOND SWART • KATES in 1995 by the Stockholm Environment Institute, the Group engages diverse participants in an exploration of the requirements for a sustainable world. Many global and regional assessments have relied on the Group’s research. PAUL RASKIN TARIQ BANURI GILBERTO GALLOPÍN PABLO GUTMAN AL HAMMOND ROBERT KATES ROB SWART Great Transition The Promise and Lure of the Times Ahead PAUL RASKIN, TARIQ BANURI, GILBERTO GALLOPÍN, PABLO GUTMAN, AL HAMMOND, ROBERT KATES, ROB SWART A report of the Global Scenario Group Stockholm Environment Institute - Boston Tellus Institute 11 Arlington Street Boston, MA 02116 Phone: 1 617 266 8090 Email: [email protected] SEI Web: http://www.sei.se GSG Web: http://www.gsg.org SEI PoleStar Series Report no. 10 © Copyright 2002 by the Stockholm Environment Institute Cover: Stephen S. Bernow Devera Ehrenberg ISBN: 0-9712418-1-3 C Printed on recycled paper To our grandparents, who labored and dreamed for us.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability in Fashion Luxury: an Atypical Paradox Evolving Into Reality
    Dipartimento di IMPRESA & MANAGEMENT Laurea Magistrale in Marketing Market relationship & Customer engagement Cattedra di Web Analytics and Marketing . Sustainability in Fashion Luxury: An atypical paradox evolving into reality. Gucci wallet case study. Matteo de Angelis Maria Giovanna Devetag RELATORE CORRELATRICE 700001 Sarah Alexia Placella Anno Accademico 2018/2019 A me stessa, che accetto ed abbraccio i miei errori come chiave per il successo, accolgo le difficoltà come sfida personale e opportunità per il cambiamento e il miglioramento. A mia nonna, che da settembre mi ha insegnato la forza di lottare sempre per il bene più grande che ci hanno dato: il Dono della Vita. A tutti i miei affetti più cari, che mi sono stati vicino in questi mesi difficili, sostenendomi e incoraggiandomi, dandomi forza e agendo da luce quando il tunnel appariva troppo scuro e la strada senza via d’uscita. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 5 CHAPTER I: SUSTAINABILITY ........................................................................................................ 10 1.1. Literature review ...................................................................................................................... 10 1.1.1. Definition and history .................................................................................................... 10 1.1.2. Triple bottom line approach ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]