DOCSLIB.ORG

Interlanguage and 20Th Century Scientific Communication

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Interlanguage and 20Th Century Scientific Communication FrankEsterhill JournalofUniversalLanguage3 March2002,17-33 Interlanguageand20thCentury ScientificCommunication FrankEsterhill InterlinguaInstitute Abstract Attheoutsetofthe20thcentury,itwastakenforgrantedthatthetrue testofanyauxiliarylanguagewouldbeitsadoptionforuseinthe sciences.Interlingua,theproductoftheInternationalAuxiliary LanguageAssociation[IALA],foundedin1924,emergedfromthe increasinglynaturalisticlinguisticmodelsofthelate19thandearly 20thcenturies(especiallythoseofLiptay,Lott,andPeano), acknowledgingthefactthatitwasthesurvivingelementsoftheLatin languagethathadlenttothemoderntonguesoftheEuropeanlittoral theircharacterofinternationalityandconsequentlydistancingitself fromthecomplicatedschematismofVolapu짲k,Esperanto,andtheir manyimitators.Forarelativelylongperiodoftime,aquarterofa century,theInterlinguaofIALAseemedtomeettheexpectationsof itsbuildersthatitwouldfunctionasavehicleofscientific communication:morethantwodozenmedicaljournalsprintedabstracts inInterlinguaandelevenworldmedicalcongressesissuedsummaries inInterlingua.Then,suddenly,atthestartofthe1980sscientificwork inInterlinguacametoanabruptend(translationsinthe Multilingual 18 Interlanguageand20thCenturyScientificCommunication CompendiumofPlantDiseases fortheU.S.DepartmentofAgriculture andabstractsinthe NewYorkStateJournalofMedicine beingthe finalscientificprojects)fromwhichtherehasbeennorecovery. 1.Introduction Universallanguagebecameafashionablesubjectonlywiththe declineofLatinasthecommonidiomofthesciencesinthe17th century.InEnglandalone,FrancisLodwick,CaveBeck,George Dalgarno,and,especially,BishopJohnWilkinspublishedtheir universalistschemesinaperiodwhichlastedslightlyovertwenty years,butthesubjectfelloutoffavoralmostimmediatelyandthe projectslanguishedinbenignneglectformorethanacentury.Thenin thesecondhalfofthe19thcenturyseveral"international"languages wereinventedbyaseriesofamateurs(Pirro,Sudre,Schleyer, Zamenhof,Sotos-Ochando,Lauda,Liptay,Lott,Peanoandamultitude ofothers),eachattractingitsownoftenexquisitelysmallbutdevoted coterieoffollowers.Animpartialstudentofthesubjectcaneasily traceintheevolutionoftheseaposteriori systemstheontogenesisof anewLatinity(Ruhrig1980:2-3),culminatinginthe20th centuryinthe registrationoftheinternationalvocabularybytheInternational AuxiliaryLanguageAssociation[IALA]underthedirectionofE.Clark StillmanandAlexanderGodeinthe Interlingua-EnglishDictionary (1951). 1.1.PreliminaryOrganizationalSteps Atthestartofthe20thcentury,LouisCouturat,professorof philosophy(andsuccessortoHenriBergson)attheCollègedeFrance, broughtrenewedintellectualrespectabilitytothetopicwiththe discoveryofunpublishedmanuscriptsofLeibniz(1901,1903a), discussing, interalia,Descartesonthesubject.1 Couturat'slater FrankEsterhill 19 historicalstudies(1903b,1907)helpedtopopularizethesubjectby bringingittotheattentionofamuchwideraudience.Alongwithhis colleague,Le´opoldLeau,hespearheadedtheDe´le´gationpourl'adoption d'unelangueauxiliaireinternationelle(theformerastreasurer,thelatter assecretarygeneral),whosesmallComite´,insteadofrecommendingan extantproject,proposedasareformcandidateitsownlanguage,Ido, in1908.TheproponentsofIdorecognizedfromthestartthatthe ultimatetestofany"constructed"languagewouldbeitsusefulnessfor scientificcommunication,yetsuchsuccessalwayseludedthem. 1.2. FoundationoftheInternationalAuxiliaryLanguage Association Asearlyas1902,theNobelLaureate,WilhelmOstwald,atthe UniversityofLeipzig,hadinterestedhisstudent,theyoungchemist, Dr.FrederickGardnerCottrell,intheideaofanauxiliarylanguage. AftertheFirstWorldWar,Cottrell,ChairmanoftheCommitteeon InternationalAuxiliaryLanguage(from1919to1936)ofthe InternationalResearchCouncil,persuadedtwowealthyandprominent NewYorkers,AliceVanderbiltMorrisandDaveHennenMorris,to foundtheInternationalAuxiliaryLanguageAssociation[IALA]in 1924,withanillustriousteamofprominentacademicsandbusiness leaders.2 Replacingthedilettantismwhichhadprecededitwithanew professionalism,IALA,foradozenyears,sponsoredlinguisticresearch (undertheaegisofEdwardSapir,OttoJespersen,andWilliamE. Collinson,togetherwithAlbertDebrunner,EdgarvonWahl,Giuseppe Peano,JosephVendryes,andothers)andorganizedmeetingsdedicated tothetaskofeffectingconciliationbetweenthealreadyexisting 1 DescartesinhislettertoMarinMersenne,November20,1629,wasrespondingto aplacardinLatinwithsixpropositions. 2 AliceVanderbiltMorrisremainedIALA'sHonorarySecretary(anditssustaining force)untilherdeathonAugust15,1950. 20 Interlanguageand20thCenturyScientificCommunication auxiliarylanguagesystems(Falk1999:40-58,Esterhill2000:1-9). Then,in1937,realizingthatallofthepreviouslyelaborated interlanguageswerefundamentallyflawedandthatcompromisewas impossible,IALAabandonedallhopefortheexistingauxiliariesand embarkeduponitsownindependentwork.Eveninthepreliminary documents--Cottrell's ReportofProgress (1923)andIALA's Outlineof Program fromthefollowingyear--IALA,althoughsuggestingthatit couldproceedbymodifyinganexistinginterlanguage,hadalready signalledthatadifferentapproachmightbenecessarywhenitresolved toseekasolutiontotheproblemeither"bytheadoptionofoneofthe existingsyntheticlanguages,asforexampleEsperanto,Ido,ormodern Latin,orbythecreationofanewlanguagebasedinsofarasmay befounddesirableuponthese(Cottrell1923:14)...."3 Inits Outlineof Program (1924),IALAsomewhatconfusinglyassertedthat"[t]he Associationhasnointentionofdevelopingorpromotinganynew language(1924:13)...."afterithadalreadybeenstated,echoingthe wordsofCottrell'sreportfromthepreviousyear,that"[t]heIALA thereforestandsfortheadoptionormodificationofasyntheticor classicallanguage,orthecreationofanewlanguage(1924:6)...."In fact,IALAdidnotinitiallyundertakeanyindependentworkto formulateanewlanguagebutinsteaddevoteditsentirefirstdecadeto thehopelesstaskofattemptingtoeffectreconciliationamongtherival auxiliariestheninexistence.4 Strangely,thepre-eminentlinguistswithin IALAfailedtoprovidemuchconstructiveguidanceovertheyears. EdwardSapir,enthusiasticaboutthesubjectfromthestart(1925), whileremainingaffiliatedwithIALAformostofthe1930s,serving abriefstintasDirectorofResearchfromSeptember,1930totheend 3 TheMemorial(inCottrell'sreport)wasrevisedthefollowingyeartostatethatan auxiliarylanguageshouldbeestablishedbytheadoptionormodificationofa syntheticoraclassicallanguageorbythecreationofanewlanguage(Cottrell1923; revised1924). 4 ThiswasIALA'sintentuntil1936.Cf.APlanforObtainingAgreementonan AuxiliaryWorld-Language (1936). FrankEsterhill 21 ofJuly,1931andauthoringmonographs(1930,1932)whose publicationwasinpartfundedbyIALA,seemstohaveplayedno pivotalroleinthatorganization(Esterhill2000:7,note6).Otto Jespersen,authorofNovial,althoughvocalinhiscriticismof EsperantoinhiscorrespondencefromDenmark,didnotactively championhisowncreation.Heremained,untilhisdeathin1943, peripheraltoIALAwhichhadalwaysbeenheadquarteredinNew York.Finally,WilliamE.Collinson(IALA'sDirectoroftheTechnical StaffattheUniversityofLiverpool),astridentEsperantistwhohad provokedmuchcriticism,wasquietlysweptaside,andcontrolover IALA'sworkwastransferredintothehandsofhiscompetentassistant, E.ClarkStillman,whenthedictionaryworkwasbegun. WithagrantfromRockefellerFoundationinJanuary1937,IALA beganthesecond(andfinal)stageofitsresearch,theregistrationof theinternationalvocabulary,underStillmanattheUniversityof Liverpool.Stillmanhadalreadyelaboratedthethree-yearprogramof researchandexperimentationwhichwouldeventuateinthegrammar andnuclearvocabularyofthelanguagewhichIALAwould recommend.HewasnamedSecretaryoftheCommitteeforAgreement inthefollowingyear(1938)andtheTechnicalStaffatLiverpoolwas placed"underhisimmediatedirection(InternationalAuxiliary LanguageAssociation1939:8)." Itwasoriginallyanticipatedthattheentireprojectwouldrequire onlythreeyearstocompletethedeterminationofIALA'slanguageand toreadyitscore: ThiscorewillconsistofaGrammarandaVocabularyofabout 2000ofthemostfrequentroot-wordsrequiredforordinary usage,togetherwithnucleiofanumberofvocabulariesin certainspecialistfields.Throughouttheperiod,astaffof linguisticworkers,expertinbothethnicandconstructed languages,willbeworkingatLiverpoolUniversityunderthe immediatedirectionoftheAssistantDirectorofTechnical 22 Interlanguageand20thCenturyScientificCommunication Research,Mr.E.ClarkStillman(InternationalAuxiliary LanguageAssociation1939:10). 5 1.3.FormulationoftheInterlanguage UpontheoutbreakofwarinEuropein1939,IALA'sfilesand recordsweresafelytransferredtoNewYorkwhereStillmanassembled anewteamtocontinuethework.Heenlistedthesupportofanable assistant,AlexanderGode,whoassumedthedirectionofIALAwhen StillmanresignedinMarch,1943inordertogoonwarduty.IALA atthatpointhadfirmlycommittedtotheInternationalVocabulary6 but wasstilldebatingthequestionastowhetheritshouldbeschematized, and,ifso,towhatextent. Gode(1942),summingupthestatusofIALA'sworktothatpoint, wrote(Romannumeralsinsquarebracketsreferringtothenumbered 5 Collinson,innameatleast,remainedDirectoroftheTechnicalStaffatLiverpool, butsincehewasnotperceivedasanimpartial,non-sectarian,orneutralparty,he appearstohaveprovokedseverecriticism.AttheMarch21,1939meetingofthe CommitteeforAgreement,hefinallyaskedthatinhisfuturecollaborationinthe workofCA[CommitteeforAgreement]hemightbeexemptedfromalllinguistic workotherthanpurelyobjectivestudies.In1941,Collinsonwaspromotedupto DirectoroftheResearchStaff(part-time,onwarleave),eventhoughthewarhad, from1939on,severedmostconnectionsbetweenhimandIALA.Heretainedhis title(andhissalary)untilhisspecialarrangementwithIALAwasterminatedin1942. YearslaterheconfessedtoanAmericanEsperantist,IvyKellermanReed (1958:1388),thathehadbeenunawareofIALA'sdictionaryworkwhichhadbeen begunatLiverpool.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Otto Jespersen and an International Auxiliary Language Centenary Of
    324 NATURE SEPTEMBER 18, 1943, VoL. 152 which enjoys facilities for large-scale experimentation moving towards ever greater simplicity and perfec­ through its member firms such as can only be avail­ tion; and he quoted Turgot's saying: "Des hommes able to industrial bodies of this kind. The research grossiers ne font rien de simple. Il faut des hommes committee of the body organizing this work visited perfectionnes pour y arriver". This !do publication the Kingston and Fulham Laboratories of the British can be recommended to all interested in the subject, Coal Utilisation Research Association on September 9. and especially it shows no unreasonable bias in Mr. J. G. Bennett, director of B.C.U.R.A., gave a favour of its own language. short address, outlining the organization of his Association and the scope of the work it has in band. Centenary of the Economist Three main divisions can be distinguished, namely, THE centenary number of the Economist worthily the administrative, the general research division, maintains the tradition of impartial examination of and the specialized research departments, the latter public affairs which it has established from the days subdivided into four or five sections. Within several of James Wilson and Walter Bagehot. The factual of the specialized sections there are investigations in approach, acute analysis, constructive criticism and progress which will undoubtedly affect coke-oven the flair for asking the right questions which have practice and the quality of the coke that can be characterized it from the start are faithfully reflected produced from a given coal or blend.
    [Show full text]
  • Edward Sapir's View About International Auxiliary Language
    EMANUEL KULCZYCKI EDWARD SAPIR’S VIEW ABOUT INTERNATIONAL AUXILIARY LANGUAGE Introduction The search for common attributes of all languages is connected with the search for characteristics which differentiate languages. If some attributes cannot be found in every language, what is cause of this situation? Is it linked up with the origin of language or with users of the language? People inquire about such matters because the multiplicity of natural languages generates incomprehension and handicaps human communication. The minimum number of languages in the world has been set at 4,000 and the maximum at 8,000. In spite of this people can communicate over communication’s barriers which are generated by the multiplicity of mother-languages. But that diversity worries and disturbs. A Danish linguist Otto Jespersen wrote: „An American may travel from Boston to San Francisco without hearing more than one language. But if he were to traverse the same distance on this side of the Atlantic, he would have a totally different story to tell (…) he would then hear perhaps Norwegian, Swedish, Danish, German, Czecho-Slovakian, Hungarian, Rumanian, Bulgarian, Turkish, Greek, and then in Egypt Arabic and a little English (…) He would not have heard of the languages spoken in Europe. The curse of Babel is still with us”1. It means that we have to use more than one language to 1 O. Jespersen: An International Language, Allen & Unwin, London 1928; <http://www.geocities.com/ /Athens/Forum/5037/AILneed.html>. 66 Emanuel Kulczycki communicate with another man. So some universal language – an international auxiliary language could make whole social communication easy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Esperantist Background of René De Saussure's Work
    Chapter 1 The Esperantist background of René de Saussure’s work Marc van Oostendorp Radboud University and The Meertens Institute ené de Saussure was arguably more an esperantist than a linguist – R somebody who was primarily inspired by his enthusiasm for the language of L. L. Zamenhof, and the hope he thought it presented for the world. His in- terest in general linguistics seems to have stemmed from his wish to show that the structure of Esperanto was better than that of its competitors, and thatit reflected the ways languages work in general. Saussure became involved in the Esperanto movement around 1906, appar- ently because his brother Ferdinand had asked him to participate in an inter- national Esperanto conference in Geneva; Ferdinand himself did not want to go because he did not want to become “compromised” (Künzli 2001). René be- came heavily involved in the movement, as an editor of the Internacia Scienca Re- vuo (International Science Review) and the national journal Svisa Espero (Swiss Hope), as well as a member of the Akademio de Esperanto, the Academy of Es- peranto that was and is responsible for the protection of the norms of the lan- guage. Among historians of the Esperanto movement, he is also still known as the inventor of the spesmilo, which was supposed to become an international currency among Esperantists (Garvía 2015). At the time, the interest in issues of artificial language solutions to perceived problems in international communication was more widespread in scholarly cir- cles than it is today. In the western world, German was often used as a language of e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Lingüistas Y Lenguas Artificiales Francisco Javier Grande Alija Universidad De León [email protected]
    F. J. Grande Alija. Lingüistas y lenguas artificiales Estudios de Lingüística del Español 41 (2020), pp. 13-41 Lingüistas y lenguas artificiales Francisco Javier Grande Alija Universidad de León [email protected] Resumen El objetivo principal de este trabajo es considerar las relaciones que, sobre todo a partir de finales del siglo XIX, han mantenido la lingüística teórica y el empeño de crear lenguas artificiales, en especial aquellas destinadas a ser utilizadas como lenguas auxiliares en la esfera internacional. Para ello centramos nuestra atención en tres figuras destacadas de la lingüística del siglo XX: O. Jespersen, E. Sapir y A. Martinet. Su interés por las lenguas artificiales no hay que verlo como una mera curiosidad en su trayectoria intelectual, sino que es un reflejo directo de su propio pensamiento sobre el lenguaje y una forma de poner a prueba algunas de las ideas que lo sustentan. Palabras claves: lenguas artificiales auxiliares, lingüística teórica, O. Jespersen, E. Sapir, A. Martinet. Abstract The main objective of this work is to consider the relationships that, especially since the late nineteenth century, have maintained the theoretical linguistics and the commitment to create artificial languages, especially those intended to be used as auxiliary languages in the international sphere. We focus our attention on three outstanding figures of twentieth-century linguistics: O. Jespersen, E. Sapir and A. Martinet. Their interest in artificial languages should not be seen as a mere curiosity in their intellectual career, but is a direct reflection of his own thinking about language and a way to test some of the ideas that sustain it.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Two Planned Languages And
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Institutional Research Information System University of Turin CHAPTER TWO PLANNED LANGUAGES AND LANGUAGE PLANNING: THE CONTRIBUTION OF INTERLINGUISTICS TO CROSS-CULTURAL COMMUNICATION FEDERICO GOBBO A new science is developing, Interlinguistics–that branch of the science of language which deals with the structure and basic ideas of all languages with the view to the establishing of a norm for interlanguages, i.e. auxiliary languages destined for oral and written use between people who cannot make themselves understood by means of their mother tongues. —Otto Jespersen (1931) Since the end of the 19th century up to the first half of the 20th century, the quest for “a norm for interlanguages” was a hotly debated issue among linguistic scholars and amateurs. In fact, about 1,000 language projects were proposed in that period, especially in Europe: the strongest effort for cross-cultural connection ever made (Albani-Buonarroti 1994). What can be inferred from it, in terms of language planning? Is there any relation or analogy between the issues encountered in natural language planning contexts (e.g. officialization, language revitalization, standardization) and interlanguage planning? Are there any general rules that can be deduced from the main historical developments of the above mentioned “quest”? Although Tauli (1968) considered interlinguistics as “the science of international language planning” (i.e. a branch of the science of language planning) very few linguists involved in language planning paid attention to interlinguistics until now. In this analysis of planned international language, the role of language amateurs will not be underestimated.
    [Show full text]
  • Otto Jespersen and 'The Woman', Then and Now
    Otto Jespersen and 'The Woman', then and now Author: Margaret Thomas Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/bc-ir:107506 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Post-print version of an article published in Historiographia Linguistica 40(3): 377-408. doi:10.1075/hl.40.3.03tho. These materials are made available for use in research, teaching and private study, pursuant to U.S. Copyright Law. The user must assume full responsibility for any use of the materials, including but not limited to, infringement of copyright and publication rights of reproduced materials. Any materials used for academic research or otherwise should be fully credited with the source. The publisher or original authors may retain copyright to the materials. HL 40:3 (2013): Article Otto Jespersen and “The Woman”, then and now Margaret Thomas Boston College 1. Introduction The Danish linguist Otto Jespersen (1860–1943) published Language, its Nature, Development and Origin in 1922, more than 90 years ago. Written in English, it was apparently addressed to a readership of students of language (Jespersen 1995 [1938]: 208-210). Jespersen was by then deep into his career as a celebrated scholar of Germanic, historical, and descriptive linguistics. About midway through his book, an 18-page Chapter 13 appears, entitled “The Woman”. This article focuses on “The Woman”, a text that has served since the 1970s as a touchstone for feminist narratives of the history of the discussion of language and gender.1 Modern treatment of Jespersen’s Chapter 13 typically casts Jespersen into the role of mouthpiece for ideas about women and language that contemporary scholars have discredited.
    [Show full text]
  • Lidepla - Omegawiki: Multilingual Dictionary
    Lidepla - OmegaWiki: Multilingual Dictionary http://www.omegawiki.org/index.php?title=Expression:Lidepla&explan... Lidepla Other languages:English Language: Lingwa de Planeta [Edit] ▼ Lingwa de Planeta : A constructed language based on the most widely sp… ▼ Definition Language Text English A constructed language based on the Lingwa de planeta most widely spoken languages of the world, including English, German, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Chinese, Russian, Hindi, Arabic, and Persian. French Langue construite basée sur les langues les plus parlées dans le monde, incluant l'anglais, l'allemand, le français, l'espagnol, le portugais, le chinois, le russe, l'hindi, l'arabe et le persan. Lingwa de Jengun-ney helpalingwa kel es basi-ney Planeta on zuy muhim lingwas de nuy planeta. ▼ Synonyms and translations Expression Language Spelling Annotation English Lidepla show ▼ English Lingwa de Planeta show ▼ German Lingwa de Planeta show ▼ Lingwa de Planeta Lingwa de Planeta show ▼ ► Semantic annotations ► Collection membership Retrieved from "http://www.omegawiki.org/Expression:Lidepla" 1 of 1 6/26/2014 11:13 AM Lingwa de planeta 1 Lingwa de planeta Lingwa de planeta (Lidepla) Created by D.Ivanov, A.Lysenko and others Date 2010 Setting and International auxiliary language usage [1] Users more than 50 (date missing)Wikipedia:Citation needed Purpose constructed language • International auxiliary language • Lingwa de planeta (Lidepla) Writing system Latin Sources Vocabulary from ten representative languages such as English, Spanish, Portuguese, French, German, Russian, Arabic, Hindi, Chinese, Persian. Language codes ISO 639-3 None (mis) Lingwa de planeta (also Lidepla, LdP) is a constructed international auxiliary language, whose development began in 2006 in Saint-Petersburg, Russia, by a group of enthusiasts, with Dmitri Ivanov being the project leader.
    [Show full text]
  • A Notion of Joyce's Time
    GENETIC JOYCE STUDIES - Issue 14 (Spring 2014) A Notion of Joyce’s Time: Interpreting the Diacritics of Finnegans Wake 124.8–12 Tekla Mecsnóber Károli University, Budapest & University of Groningen Introduction: the crux1 There is a passage in the description of the mysterious letter of book I chapter 5 of Finnegans Wake that seems to have been as much of a challenge for scholars as it was for printers: The unmistaken identity of the persons in the Tiberiast duplex came to light in the most devious of ways. The original document was in what is known as Hanno O’Nonhanno’s unbrookable script, that is to say, it showed no signs of punctuation of any sort. Yet on holding the verso against a lit rush this new book of Morses responded most remarkably to the silent query of our world’s oldest light and its recto let out the piquant fact that it was but pierced butnot punctured (in the university sense of the term) by numerous stabs and foliated gashes made by a pronged instrument. These paper wounds, four in type, were gradually and correctly understood to mean stop, please stop, do please stop, and O do please stop respectively, and following up their one true clue, the circumflexuous wall of a singleminded men’s asylum, accentuated by bi tso fb rok engl a ssan dspl itch ina, — Yard inquiries pointed out → that they ad bîn “provoked” ay ∧ fork, of à grave Brofèsor; àth é’s Brèak — fast — table; ; acùtely profèššionally piquéd, to=introdùce a notion of time [ùpon à plane (?) sù ’ ’ fàc’e’] by pùnct ! ingh oles (sic) in iSpace?! (FW 123.30–124.12)2 1 I am profoundly grateful to Fritz Senn of the Zurich James Joyce Foundation for giving me not only the opportunity to do research at the Foundation, but also full access to all materials held by it.
    [Show full text]
  • Essentials of English Grammar
    www.IELTS4U.blogfa.com Essentials of English Grammar www.IELTS4U.blogfa.com Essentials of English Grammar Otto Jespersen www.IELTS4U.blogfa.com London First published March 1933 by George Allan & Unwin Ltd Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2006. “To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge’s collection of thousands of eBooks please go to http://www.ebookstore.tandf.co.uk/.” This book is copyright under the Berne Convention. All rights are reserved. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, 1956, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, electrical, chemical, mechanical, optical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. Enquiries should be sent to the publishers at the undermentioned address: ISBN 0-203-42578-2 Master e-book ISBN ISBN 0-203-73402-5 (Adobe e-Reader Format) ISBN 0-415-10440-8 (Print Edition) www.IELTS4U.blogfa.com Preface THE appearance of this book is due to urgent appeals from some English friends (among them Professors W.E.Collinson, G.C.Moore Smith, and R.A.Williams), who asked me to bring out a one-volume grammar embodying the principles explained in The Philosophy of Grammar and partly carried out in the seven volumes of my Modern English Grammar. After some years of hesitation I have now made the attempt, but of course the responsibility for its shortcomings rests exclusively upon me.
    [Show full text]
  • Quattro Lezioni Tra Democrazia Iinguistica E Minoranze
    Rivish inviata in abbonmento agli associati FEt (vedasi p.2) Èezzo di un singolo nmero 2 € Fr tldia 3 € per I'Estero Quattro lezioni tra democrazia Iinguistica e minoranze a cura di Davide Astori Pianifîcazione linguistica e lingue pianificate Federico Gobbo Università dell'lnsubria federico. gobbo@gma i l.com l. Introduzione La disciplina scientifica che prende il nome di'interlinguistica'entrò nel dibattito dei linguisti attraverso l'intervento di Otto Jespersen al secondo congresso internazionale dei linguisti del 1931 svoltosi a Ginevra. Secondo la sua esposizione si tratta di una scienza, il cui campo d'indagine è la creazione delle norme delle interlingue, vale a dire lingue ausiliarie costruite per I'uso scritto e orale tra esseri umani che non hanno in comune la stessa madrelingua (Jrsennserv l93l). Tale approccio - molto presente nella prima metà del Novecento - si è praticamente fermato dopo la pubblicazione dell'Interlingua nel 1951, redatta principalmente secondo la guida di Alexander Gode. Oggigiorno solo I'esperanto ha una comunità stabile di parlanti; a grande distanza seguono I'Ido e I'Interlingua. Un rinnovato interesse per diverse lingue pianificate - per la maggior parte progetti - è riscontrabile da quando internet è diventato un fenomeno di massa (Gonno 2005a). Comunque, nessuna proposta posteriore al 1951 ha avuto una diffusione significativa in termini sociolinguistici (Gonno 2005b). La conseguenza più diretta è invero molto semplice: I'intero apparato speculativo interlinguistico fatto da linguisti, scienziati e amatori nella pianificazione delle lingue pianificate è rimasto fuori dal dibattito scientifico nell'area della pianificazione linguistica, che è a sua volta un ramo della linguistica.
    [Show full text]
  • Semantic Compositionality: Esperanto Word Formation for Language Technology*
    Semantic compositionality: Esperanto word formation for language technology* KLAUS SCHUBERT Abstract For the use of Esperanto as an intermediate language in machine translation, a productive system of word formation that yields complex word forms with a predictable meaning is an essential asset. The study investigates the elements of the word-formational system of Esperanto and pays special attention to the combinatorial rules that allow the derivation of the meaning of complex word forms. An elaborate word grammar is presented and those aspects are pointed out which have a cross-linguistic bearing. The limitations of compositionality are discussed, which leads to some insights about the opposition of rule-based versus probabilistic techniques in computational linguistics. 1. Infinite use of finite means A fundamental goal of computational linguistics is to make intelligent computer systems fit for handling human language with both its regularity and its irregularity. A phenomenon of essential importance to many advanced developments in language technology is semantic composition- ality. There is no way to make computer systems "understand" texts in plain language unless the linguistic rules and mechanisms that build up complex meanings from the smallest meaningful elements are exhaustively accounted for. In the present contribution, I shall study semantic compo- sitionality with a specific interest in word formation, and I shall focus on word formation in Esperanto. This choice of object field makes it possible to view semantic compositionality in an especially clear light: in Esperanto word formation, the regularities of semantic composition are hardly troubled by syntactic peculiarities. The present study does not contain any computational formalisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Languages in Contact 2014 Scientific Board of the Committee for Philology of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Wrocław Branch
    Languages in Contact 2014 Scientific Board of the Committee for Philology of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Wrocław Branch: Ines Adornetti (Rome, Italy) Andrei A. Avram (Bucharest, Romania) Piotr Cap (Łódź) Camelia M. Cmeciu (Bucharest, Romania) Piotr P. Chruszczewski (Wrocław) Józef Darski (Poznań) Marta Degani (Verona, Italy) Robin Dunbar (Oxford, UK) Katarzyna Dziubalska-Kołaczyk (Poznań) Francesco Ferretti (Rome, Italy) Jacek Fisiak (Poznań) James A. Fox (Stanford, USA) Stanisław Gajda (Opole) Piotr Gąsiorowski (Poznań) Franciszek Grucza (Warszawa) Philippe Hiligsmann (Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium) Rafael Jiménez Cataño (Rome, Italy) Henryk Kardela (Lublin) Ewa Kębłowska-Ławniczak (Wrocław) Grzegorz A. Kleparski (Rzeszów) Aleksandra R. Knapik (Wrocław) Tomasz P. Krzeszowski (Warszawa) Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (Łódź) Ryszard Lipczuk (Szczecin) Lorenzo Magnani (Pavia, Italy) Witold Mańczak (Kraków) Jacek Mianowski (Bydgoszcz) Marek Paryż (Warszawa) Michał Post (Wrocław) Stanisław Prędota (Wrocław) John R. Rickford (Stanford, USA) Hans Sauer (Munich, Germany) Waldemar Skrzypczak (Toruń) Agnieszka Stępkowska (Warszawa) Aleksander Szwedek (Poznań) Elżbieta Tabakowska (Kraków) Marco Tamburelli (Bangor, Wales) Kamila Turewicz (Łódź) Zdzisław Wąsik (Wrocław) Jerzy Wełna (Warszawa) Roland Willemyns (Brussels, Belgium) Donald Winford (Columbus, USA) Tadeusz Zabrocki (Poznań) edited by Piotr P. Chruszczewski Richard L. Lanigan John R. Rickford Katarzyna Buczek Aleksandra R. Knapik Jacek Mianowski Languages in Contact 2014 Wrocław – Washington,
    [Show full text]