DOCSLIB.ORG

Greenway and Open Space Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Franklin County Greenway and Open Space Plan DCNR Project #BRC-TAG-11-206 a pennsylvania corporation TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................................................7 INTRODUCTION WHAT IS A GREENWAY? ............................................................................................................. 9 WHY A GREENWAYS PLAN FOR FRANKLIN COUNTY? ..........................................................9 Preserving Franklin County’s Defi ning Characteristics ........................................................................................... 10 Expanding the Economy .......................................................................................................................................... 11 Protecting Sensitive Habitats .................................................................................................................................... 12 Protecting Drinking Water Resources ...................................................................................................................... 12 HOW IS A GREENWAYS PLAN DEVELOPED? ........................................................................13 Three - Step Process ................................................................................................................................................. 13 Public Participation .................................................................................................................................................. 13 Project Purpose ......................................................................................................................................................... 14 Goals and Objectives ................................................................................................................................................ 14 The Greenways and Open Space Plan as a Decision-Making Tool ......................................................................... 14 SECTION I - WHERE ARE WE NOW? INVENTORY: BUILDING BLOCKS OF A GREENWAYS SYSTEM ...........................................17 Gathering the Data .................................................................................................................................................... 17 Existing Planning Efforts ......................................................................................................................................... 17 Natural Resources ..................................................................................................................................................... 23 Hydrologic Resources Map ................................................................................................................................ 29 Priority Habitat Areas Map ............................................................................................................................... 31 Sensitive Environmental Features Map ............................................................................................................. 37 Built Resources ......................................................................................................................................................... 39 Recreation Features Map ................................................................................................................................... 45 Cultural and Historic Resources Map ............................................................................................................... 53 Current and Future Development Map .............................................................................................................. 59 SECTION II - WHERE DO WE WANT TO BE CREATING THE VISION: DESIGNING A GREENWAYS NETWORK .......................................61 The Criteria ............................................................................................................................................................... 61 The Structure of the Network ................................................................................................................................... 62 Proposed Conservation Greenways Plan .......................................................................................................... 71 Proposed Recreation Greenways Plan .............................................................................................................. 81 Proposed Greenways Plan ................................................................................................................................. 89 SECTION III - HOW DO WE GET THERE? SECTION III - HOW DO WE GET THERE? ................................................................................91 Management Structure ............................................................................................................................................. 91 Proposed Management Structure Chart ............................................................................................................ 93 Land Conservation Tools .......................................................................................................................................... 97 Implementation Plan ............................................................................................................................................... 105 Implementation Process Tables ....................................................................................................................... 107 Potential Funding Sources Tables ................................................................................................................... 117 TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) APPENDICES (SEPARATE DOCUMENT) A: Meeting Minutes B: Key Person Interview Results C: Press Releases D: Summary of Public Comments on the Draft Greenways Plan E: Franklin County’s Nationally-registered Historic Places F: List Of Regional Land Trusts G: Riparian Buffer Information Pashek Associates Stream Buffer Width Justifi cations Chesapeake Bay Program Riparian Buffer Information H: Example Ordinances and Information - Stream Protection Easement Chesapeake Bay Foundation Model Stream Buffer Ordinance Guilford Township Stream Protection Ordinance J: Example Ordinances - Conservation By Design Antrim Township Open Space Plan Excerpt Antrim Township Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance - Conservation by Design Antrim Township Zoning Ordinance - Conservation by Design Growing Greener Conservation by Design Overview Model Landscaping Ordinance Forest Friendly Development - Defi nition and Criteria for Development Analysis K: Example Ordinance - Overlay Zoning Districts Growing Greener Model Ordinance Language for Conservation Design Overlay District L: Example Ordinance - Natural Features Buffer Ann Arbor Township Natural Features Ordinance M: Example Ordinance - Woodlands Protection City of Wixom, MI - Woodlands Ordinance N: Example Ordinances - Agriculture Pollution Control Model Integrated Pest Management Ordinance Southeast Michigan Council of Governments - Agricultural Runoff Ordinance P: Example Ordinance - Mandatory Dedication North Huntingdon Township (PA) Mandatory Dedication Ordinance Q: Illustrated Article on Falling Spring Greenway R: DCNR Greenways Website Resource List S: Keystone Active Zone (KAZ) 2006 Program Brochure AAcknowledgementscknowledgements The contributions of the following groups and individuals were vital to the success of the Franklin County Greenway Plan. They are commended for their interest in the project, their perseverance, and the input they provided throughout the planning process. Franklin County Board of Commissioners G. Warren Elliott - Chairman Robert L.Thomas - Vice-Chairman Cheryl S. Plummer Franklin County Planning Commission and Staff Project Study Committee Todd Burns - Greene Township Herbert Doloway - Chambersburg Recreation Department Christopher Firme - Washington Township / Potomac Appalachian Trail Club Tammy Gross - Franklin County Conservation District Bill Hague - Penn Hall / Audubon Society George Hurd - Penn State Cooperative Extension Charles D. Jamison, Jr. - Greene Township Tanya Nitterhouse - Sunny Hill Properties Maragaret Ronelslad - Washington Township Anna Swailes - Metal Township Charles White, Greencastle-Antrim School District / Tayamentasachta Environmental Center Franklin County Watershed Association Conodoquinet Creek Watershed Association Conococheague Creek Watershed Alliance Antietam Creek Watershed Association Middle Spring Watershed Association Also, this project would not have been possible without the valuable input given by the residents of Franklin County, as well as the support of local government offi cials and the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. This project was fi nanced in part by a grant from the Keystone Recreation, Park, and Conservation Fund under the administration of the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Bureau of Recreation and Conservation. INTRODUCTION WHAT IS A GREENWAY? Greenways have been defi ned in several ways since the term was fi rst th coined in the 19P P century. Charles Little, in his book, Greenways for America, defi ned them in the following way: A greenway is a linear open space established along either a natural corridor, such as a riverfront, stream valley, or ridgeline, or overland along a railroad right-of-way converted to recreational
Recommended publications
  • A Taxonomic Revision of Rhododendron L. Section Pentanthera G

    A Taxonomic Revision of Rhododendron L. Section Pentanthera G

    A TAXONOMIC REVISION OF RHODODENDRON L. SECTION PENTANTHERA G. DON (ERICACEAE) BY KATHLEEN ANNE KRON A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 1987 , ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I gratefully acknowledge the supervision and encouragement given to me by Dr. Walter S. Judd. I thoroughly enjoyed my work under his direction. I would also like to thank the members of my advisory committee, Dr. Bijan Dehgan, Dr. Dana G. Griffin, III, Dr. James W. Kimbrough, Dr. Jonathon Reiskind, Dr. William Louis Stern, and Dr. Norris H. Williams for their critical comments and suggestions. The National Science Foundation generously supported this project in the form of a Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant;* field work in 1985 was supported by a grant from the Highlands Biological Station, Highlands, North Carolina. I thank the curators of the following herbaria for the loan of their material: A, AUA, BHA, DUKE, E, FSU, GA, GH, ISTE, JEPS , KW, KY, LAF, LE NCSC, NCU, NLU NO, OSC, PE, PH, LSU , M, MAK, MOAR, NA, , RSA/POM, SMU, SZ, TENN, TEX, TI, UARK, UC, UNA, USF, VDB, VPI, W, WA, WVA. My appreciation also is offered to the illustrators, Gerald Masters, Elizabeth Hall, Rosa Lee, Lisa Modola, and Virginia Tomat. I thank Dr. R. Howard * BSR-8601236 ii Berg for the scanning electron micrographs. Mr. Bart Schutzman graciously made available his computer program to plot the results of the principal components analyses. The herbarium staff, especially Mr. Kent D. Perkins, was always helpful and their service is greatly appreciated.
  • News Release Address: Email and Homepage: U.S

    News Release Address: Email and Homepage: U.S

    News Release Address: Email and Homepage: U.S. Department of the Interior Maryland-Delaware-D.C. District [email protected] U.S. Geological Survey 8987 Yellow Brick Road http://md.water.usgs.gov/ Baltimore, MD 21237 Release: Contact: Phone: Fax: January 4, 2002 Wendy S. McPherson (410) 238-4255 (410) 238-4210 Below Normal Rainfall and Warm Temperatures Lead to Record Low Water Levels in December Three months of above normal temperatures and four months of below normal rainfall have led to record low monthly streamflow and ground-water levels, according to hydrologists at the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) in Baltimore, Maryland. Streamflow was below normal at 94 percent of the real-time USGS gaging stations and 83 percent of the USGS observation wells across Maryland and Delaware in December. Record low streamflow levels for December were set at Winters Run and Pocomoke River. Streamflow levels at Deer Creek and Winters Run in Harford County have frequently set new record daily lows for the last four months (see real-time graphs at http://md.water.usgs.gov/realtime/). Streamflow was also significantly below normal at Antietam Creek, Choptank River, Conococheague Creek, Nassawango Creek, Patapsco River, Gunpowder River, Patuxent River, Piscataway Creek, Monocacy River, and Potomac River in Maryland, and Christina River, St. Jones River, and White Clay Creek in Delaware. The monthly streamflow in the Potomac River near Washington, D.C. was 82 percent below normal in December and 54 percent below normal for 2001. Streamflow entering the Chesapeake Bay averaged 23.7 bgd (billion gallons per day), which is 54 percent below the long-term average for December.

  • Local Food, Farm and Outdoor Attractions Guide for The

    LOCAL FOOD, FARM & OUTDOOR ATTRACTIONS IN CUMBERLAND VALLEY AND THE SOUTH MOUNTAIN REGION PRODUCE AVAILABILITY GUIDE INSIDE VisitCumberlandValley.com 888.513.5130 #FounditinCV Produce Availability by Month Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec FRUITS Apples Apricots Blackberries Black Raspberries Red Raspberries Blueberries Cantaloupe Cherry (Tart) Cherry (Sweet) Cider Grapes Nectarines Peaches Pears Plums Strawberries Watermelons Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec VEGETABLES Asparagus Beans (Lima) South Middleton Township, Emerald Stone Photography & Design Beans (Snap) Beets Broccoli Contents Cabbage Carrots Caulifl ower Celery Agricultural Heritage .......................................................... 2-3 Corn (Sweet) Local Food ...................................................................... 4-17 Wine & Beer Trails, Attractions ........................................ 18-20 Cucumbers Outdoor Recreation ........................................................ 21-31 Eggplant Plan Your Visit .....................................................................32 Lettuce Cumberland County Planning Department ..............................32 Mushrooms Produce Availability Guide ............................. Inside Front Cover Onions Partnership for Better Health ............................Inside Back Cover Peas Visitor Information ...................................................Back Cover Peppers Potatoes On the cover: Cumberland Valley Rail Trail in Newville, Eric Forberger; Pumpkin patch, Boiling Pumpkins
  • To Middle Silurian) in Eastern Pennsylvania

    To Middle Silurian) in Eastern Pennsylvania

    The Shawangunk Formation (Upper OrdovicianC?) to Middle Silurian) in Eastern Pennsylvania GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 744 Work done in cooperation with the Pennsylvania Depa rtm ent of Enviro nm ental Resources^ Bureau of Topographic and Geological Survey The Shawangunk Formation (Upper Ordovician (?) to Middle Silurian) in Eastern Pennsylvania By JACK B. EPSTEIN and ANITA G. EPSTEIN GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 744 Work done in cooperation with the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources, Bureau of Topographic and Geological Survey Statigraphy, petrography, sedimentology, and a discussion of the age of a lower Paleozoic fluvial and transitional marine clastic sequence in eastern Pennsylvania UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1972 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 74-189667 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 65 cents (paper cover) Stock Number 2401-2098 CONTENTS Page Abstract _____________________________________________ 1 Introduction __________________________________________ 1 Shawangunk Formation ___________________________________ 1 Weiders Member __________ ________________________ 2 Minsi Member ___________________________________ 5 Lizard Creek Member _________________________________ 7 Tammany Member _______________________________-_ 12 Age of the Shawangunk Formation _______ __________-___ 14 Depositional environments and paleogeography _______________ 16 Measured sections ______________________________________ 23 References cited ________________________________________ 42 ILLUSTRATIONS Page FIGURE 1. Generalized geologic map showing outcrop belt of the Shawangunk Formation in eastern Pennsylvania and northwestern New Jersey ___________________-_ 3 2. Stratigraphic section of the Shawangunk Formation in the report area ___ 3 3-21. Photographs showing 3. Conglomerate and quartzite, Weiders Member, Lehigh Gap ____ 4 4.
  • Maryland Stream Waders 10 Year Report

    Maryland Stream Waders 10 Year Report

    MARYLAND STREAM WADERS TEN YEAR (2000-2009) REPORT October 2012 Maryland Stream Waders Ten Year (2000-2009) Report Prepared for: Maryland Department of Natural Resources Monitoring and Non-tidal Assessment Division 580 Taylor Avenue; C-2 Annapolis, Maryland 21401 1-877-620-8DNR (x8623) [email protected] Prepared by: Daniel Boward1 Sara Weglein1 Erik W. Leppo2 1 Maryland Department of Natural Resources Monitoring and Non-tidal Assessment Division 580 Taylor Avenue; C-2 Annapolis, Maryland 21401 2 Tetra Tech, Inc. Center for Ecological Studies 400 Red Brook Boulevard, Suite 200 Owings Mills, Maryland 21117 October 2012 This page intentionally blank. Foreword This document reports on the firstt en years (2000-2009) of sampling and results for the Maryland Stream Waders (MSW) statewide volunteer stream monitoring program managed by the Maryland Department of Natural Resources’ (DNR) Monitoring and Non-tidal Assessment Division (MANTA). Stream Waders data are intended to supplementt hose collected for the Maryland Biological Stream Survey (MBSS) by DNR and University of Maryland biologists. This report provides an overview oft he Program and summarizes results from the firstt en years of sampling. Acknowledgments We wish to acknowledge, first and foremost, the dedicated volunteers who collected data for this report (Appendix A): Thanks also to the following individuals for helping to make the Program a success. • The DNR Benthic Macroinvertebrate Lab staffof Neal Dziepak, Ellen Friedman, and Kerry Tebbs, for their countless hours in
  • Trip Schedule NOVEMBER 2013 – FEBRUARY 2014 the Club Is Dependent Upon the Voluntary Trail Policies and Etiquette Cooperation of Those Participating in Its Activities

    Trip Schedule NOVEMBER 2013 – FEBRUARY 2014 the Club Is Dependent Upon the Voluntary Trail Policies and Etiquette Cooperation of Those Participating in Its Activities

    Mountain Club of Maryland Trip Schedule NOVEMBER 2013 – FEBRUARY 2014 The Club is dependent upon the voluntary Trail Policies and Etiquette cooperation of those participating in its activities. Observance of the following guidelines will enhance the enjoyment The Mountain Club of Maryland (MCM) is a non-profit organization, of everyone: founded in 1934, whose primary concern is to provide its members and • Register before the deadline. Early registration for overnight or com- guests the opportunity to enjoy nature through hiking and other activi- plicated trips is especially helpful. Leaders may close registration early ties, particularly in the mountainous areas accessible to Baltimore. when necessary to limit the size of the trip. The leader may also refuse We publish a hike and activities schedule, with varieties in location registration to persons who may not be sufficiently strong to stay with and difficulty. We welcome guests to participate in most of our activi- the group. ties. We include some specialized hikes, such as family or nature hikes. • Trips are seldom canceled, even for inclement weather. Check with We help each other, but ultimately everyone is responsible for their the leader when conditions are questionable. If you must cancel, call individual safety and welfare on MCM trips. the leader before he or she leaves for the starting point. Members and We generally charge a guest fee of $2 for non-members. This fee is guests who cancel after trip arrangements have been made are billed waived for members of other Appalachian Trail maintaining clubs. Club for any food or other expenses incurred. members, through their dues, pay the expenses associated with publish- • Arrive early.
  • View of Valley and Ridge Structures from ?:R Stop IX

    View of Valley and Ridge Structures from ?:R Stop IX

    GIJIDEBOOJ< TECTONICS AND. CAMBRIAN·ORDO'IICIAN STRATIGRAPHY CENTRAL APPALACHIANS OF PENNSYLVANIA. Pifftbutgh Geological Society with the Appalachian Geological Society Septembet, 1963 TECTONICS AND CAMBRIAN -ORDOVICIAN STRATIGRAPHY in the CENTRAL APPALACHIANS OF PENNSYLVANIA FIELD CONFERENCE SPONSORS Pittsburgh Geological Society Appalachian Geological Society September 19, 20, 21, 1963 CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Acknowledgments 2 Cambro-Ordovician Stratigraphy of Central and South-Central 3 Pennsylvania by W. R. Wagner Fold Patterns and Continuous Deformation Mechanisms of the 13 Central Pennsylvania Folded Appalachians by R. P. Nickelsen Road Log 1st day: Bedford to State College 31 2nd day: State College to Hagerstown 65 3rd day: Hagerstown to Bedford 11.5 ILLUSTRATIONS Page Wagner paper: Figure 1. Stratigraphic cross-section of Upper-Cambrian 4 in central and south-central Pennsylvania Figure 2. Stratigraphic section of St.Paul-Beekmantown 6 rocks in central Pennsylvania and nearby Maryland Nickelsen paper: Figure 1. Geologic map of Pennsylvania 15 Figure 2. Structural lithic units and Size-Orders of folds 18 in central Pennsylvania Figure 3. Camera lucida sketches of cleavage and folds 23 Figure 4. Schematic drawing of rotational movements in 27 flexure folds Road Log: Figure 1. Route of Field Trip 30 Figure 2. Stratigraphic column for route of Field Trip 34 Figure 3. Cross-section of Martin, Miller and Rankey wells- 41 Stops I and II Figure 4. Map and cross-sections in sinking Valley area- 55 Stop III Figure 5. Panorama view of Valley and Ridge structures from ?:r Stop IX Figure 6. Camera lucida sketch of sedimentary features in ?6 contorted shale - Stop X Figure 7- Cleavage and bedding relationship at Stop XI ?9 Figure 8.
  • Capper-Cramton Resource Guide 2019

    Capper-Cramton Resource Guide 2019

    Resource Guide Review of Projects on Lands Acquired Under the Capper-Cramton Act TAME Coalition TAME F A Martin Northwest Branch Trail Indian Creek Stream Valley Park Overview The Capper-Cramton Act (CCA) of 1930 (46 Stat. 482) was enacted for the acquisition, establishment, and development of the George Washington Memorial Parkway and stream valley parks in Maryland and Virginia to create a comprehensive park, parkway, and playground system in the National Capital.1 In addition to authorizing funding for acquisition, the act granted the National Capital Park and Planning Commission, now the National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC), review authority to approve any Capper-Cramton park development or management plan in order to ensure the protection and preservation of the region’s valuable watersheds and parklands. Subsequent amendments to the Capper-Cramton Act2 allocated funds for the acquisition and extension of this park and parkway system in Maryland and Virginia. Title to lands acquired with such funds or lands donated to the United States as Capper Cramton land is vested in the state in which it is located. The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission (M-NCPPC) utilized Capper-Cramton funds to protect stream valleys in parts of Montgomery and Prince George’s Counties. Similarly, the District of Columbia used federal funds to develop recreation centers, playgrounds, and park systems. There is no evidence that Virginia utilized Capper-Cramton funds to acquire stream valley parks under the CCA. Today, over 10,000 acres of Capper-Cramton land have been established and preserved as a result of the act. This resource guide is for general information purposes, and is not a regulatory document.
  • Report of Investigations 71 (Pdf, 4.8

    Report of Investigations 71 (Pdf, 4.8

    Department of Natural Resources Resource Assessment Service MARYLAND GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Emery T. Cleaves, Director REPORT OF INVESTIGATIONS NO. 71 A STRATEGY FOR A STREAM-GAGING NETWORK IN MARYLAND by Emery T. Cleaves, State Geologist and Director, Maryland Geological Survey and Edward J. Doheny, Hydrologist, U.S. Geological Survey Prepared for the Maryland Water Monitoring Council in cooperation with the Stream-Gage Committee 2000 Parris N. Glendening Governor Kathleen Kennedy Townsend Lieutenant Governor Sarah Taylor-Rogers Secretary Stanley K. Arthur Deputy Secretary MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 580 Taylor Avenue Annapolis, Maryland 21401 General DNR Public Information Number: 1-877-620-8DNR http://www.dnr.state.md.us MARYLAND GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 2300 St. Paul Street Baltimore, Maryland 21218 (410) 554-5500 http://mgs.dnr.md.gov The facilities and services of the Maryland Department of Natural Resources are available to all without regard to race, color, religion, sex, age, national origin, or physical or mental disability. COMMISSION OF THE MARYLAND GEOLOGICAL SURVEY M. GORDON WOLMAN, CHAIRMAN F. PIERCE LINAWEAVER ROBERT W. RIDKY JAMES B. STRIBLING CONTENTS Page Executive summary.........................................................................................................................................................1 Why stream gages?.........................................................................................................................................................4 Introduction............................................................................................................................................................4
  • PRIMITIVE CAMPING in Pennsylvania State Parks and Forests 11/2014

    PRIMITIVE CAMPING in Pennsylvania State Parks and Forests 11/2014

    PRIMITIVE CAMPING in Pennsylvania State Parks and Forests 11/2014 What is Primitive Camping? Primitive camping is a simplistic style of camping. Campers hike, pedal or paddle to reach a location and spend the night without the presence of developed facilities. This primitive camping experience takes place off the beaten path, where piped water, restrooms and other amenities are not provided. You pack in all you need, exchanging a few conveniences for the solitude found in the back country setting. Fresh air, fewer people and out-of-the-way natural landscapes are some of the benefits of primitive camping. Once off the beaten path, however, additional advantages begin to surface such as a deeper awareness and greater appreciation of the outdoor world around you. Primitive camping also builds outdoor skills and fosters a gratifying sense of self-sufficiency. Where to Camp Pennsylvania has 2.2 million acres of state forest land with 2,500 miles of trails and 5,132 miles of Camping at rivers and streams winding through it. Hiking, biking and multi-use trails traverse most state forest districts and six districts have designated water trails that transect state forest land. Forest Districts State parks are not open to primitive camping. However, with the exception of William Penn State Forest, all state forest districts are open to this activity. Camping is not permitted in designated STATE FOREST DISTRICTS: natural areas or at vistas, trail heads, picnic areas and areas that are posted closed to camping. Bald Eagle State Forest (570) 922-3344 Contact a forest district office for specific information, maps and Camping Permits (if needed).
  • FALL FOLIAGE REPORT October 1 – October 7, 2020

    FALL FOLIAGE REPORT October 1 – October 7, 2020

    Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Bureau of Forestry PENNSYLVANIA WEEKLY FALL FOLIAGE REPORT October 1 – October 7, 2020 TIOGA CAMERON BRADFORD To predict peak season from the colors, use these guidelines: ➢ Dark Green/No Change= peak is three weeks to a month away ➢ Light Green/Starting to Change= peak is approximately two to three weeks away ➢ Yellow/Approaching Best Color= peak is approximately one week away ➢ Orange/Best Color= foliage is peaking this week ➢ Red/Starting to Fade= still some nice color but won’t last more than a few more days ➢ Brown/Past Peak= all or nearly all color is gone Statewide Fall Foliage Overview What a difference a week makes! Cold and frosty nights and very dry conditions have ushered in marked changes across the northern tier, where foliage is at its spectacular peak. Sugar and red maples are the stars of the show, contrasting beautifully with the still-green oak canopies. Another cold snap could jumpstart much of the Appalachian and Allegheny mountain regions, setting the table for back to back weeks of fantastic fall foliage viewing opportunities across wide swaths of the commonwealth. Northwestern Region The district manager in Cornplanter State Forest District (Warren, Erie counties) reports that cooler nights have spurred fall colors in northwest Pennsylvania. Many oaks are still quite green, but maples (sugar and red) are displaying brilliant colors. Aspen, hickory, and birch are continuing to color the landscape with warm yellow hues. Route 6 to Chapman State Park is a recommended fall foliage corridor in Warren County. Exciting fall color can be found at Chapman State Park.
  • Corridor Analysis for the Potomac Heritage National Scenic Trail in Northern Virginia

    Corridor Analysis for the Potomac Heritage National Scenic Trail in Northern Virginia

    Corridor Analysis For The Potomac Heritage National Scenic Trail In Northern Virginia June 2011 Acknowledgements The Northern Virginia Regional Commission (NVRC) wishes to acknowledge the following individuals for their contributions to this report: Don Briggs, Superintendent of the Potomac Heritage National Scenic Trail for the National Park Service; Liz Cronauer, Fairfax County Park Authority; Mike DePue, Prince William Park Authority; Bill Ference, City of Leesburg Park Director; Yon Lambert, City of Alexandria Department of Transportation; Ursula Lemanski, Rivers, Trails and Conservation Assistance Program for the National Park Service; Mark Novak, Loudoun County Park Authority; Patti Pakkala, Prince William County Park Authority; Kate Rudacille, Northern Virginia Regional Park Authority; Jennifer Wampler, Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation; and Greg Weiler, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The report is an NVRC staff product, supported with funds provided through a cooperative agreement with the National Capital Region National Park Service. Any assessments, conclusions, or recommendations contained in this report represent the results of the NVRC staff’s technical investigation and do not represent policy positions of the Northern Virginia Regional Commission unless so stated in an adopted resolution of said Commission. The views expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the jurisdictions, the National Park Service, or any of its sub agencies. Funding for this report was through a cooperative agreement with The National Park Service Report prepared by: Debbie Spiliotopoulos, Senior Environmental Planner Northern Virginia Regional Commission with assistance from Samantha Kinzer, Environmental Planner The Northern Virginia Regional Commission 3060 Williams Drive, Suite 510 Fairfax, VA 22031 703.642.0700 www.novaregion.org Page 2 Northern Virginia Regional Commission As of May 2011 Chairman Hon.