Inclusive Taxon Sampling Suggests a Single, Stepwise Origin of Ectolecithality in Platyhelminthes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Inclusive Taxon Sampling Suggests a Single, Stepwise Origin of Ectolecithality in Platyhelminthes bs_bs_banner Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2014, 111, 570–588. With 3 figures Inclusive taxon sampling suggests a single, stepwise origin of ectolecithality in Platyhelminthes CHRISTOPHER E. LAUMER* and GONZALO GIRIBET FLS Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/biolinnean/article/111/3/570/2415786 by guest on 30 September 2021 Museum of Comparative Zoology & Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA Received 16 September 2013; revised 7 November 2013; accepted for publication 11 November 2013 Ectolecithality is a form of oogenesis unique within Metazoa but common in Platyhelminthes, in which almost yolkless oocytes and tightly associated yolk cells are deposited together in egg capsules. Despite profound impacts on the embryogenesis and morphology of its beneficiaries, the origins of this developmental phenomenon remain obscure. Traditionally, all ectolecithal flatworms were grouped in a clade called Neoophora. However, there are also morphological arguments for multiple origins of ectolecithality and, to date, Neoophora has seen little support from molecular phylogenetic research, largely as a result of gaps in taxon sampling. Accordingly, we present a molecular phylogeny focused on resolving the deepest divergences among the free-living Platyhelminthes. Species were chosen to completely span the diversity of all major endo- and ectolecithal clades, including several aberrant species of uncertain systematic affinity and, additionally, a thorough sampling of the ‘lecithoepitheliate’ higher taxa Prorhynchida and Gnosonesimida, respectively, under- and unrepresented in phylogenies to date. Our analyses validate the monophyly of all classical higher platyhelminth taxa, and also resolve a clade possessing distinct yolk-cell and oocyte generating organs (which we name Euneoophora new taxon). Furthermore, implied-weights parsimony and Bayesian mixture model analyses suggest common ancestry of this clade with the lecithoepitheliates, implying that these taxa may retain a primitive form of ectolecithality. This topology thus corroborates the classical hypothesis of homology between yolk cells and oocytes in all Neoophora, and should serve to guide future evolutionary research on this unique developmental innovation in Platyhelminthes. © 2014 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2014, 111, 570–588. ADDITIONAL KEYWORDS: phylogenetics – Neoophora – Gnosonesimida – Prorhynchida – mixture model – heterotachy – implied weights parsimony. INTRODUCTION et al., 1991), a hypothesis that has seen no recent support in light of recent molecular phylogenies Flatworms (phylum Platyhelminthes) are among (Baguñà & Riutort, 2004), the most speciose flat- Earth’s dominant invertebrate animals, with over worm groups (e.g. Tricladida, Rhabdocoela, and 6500 described free-living (Tyler et al., 2012) and Neodermata) have diverged remarkably from the ana- 20 000 parasitic species (Caira & Littlewood, 2013). tomical and developmental simplicity commonly Indeed, their total diversity may be over an order of evoked in discussions of this phylum. In particular, as magnitude larger as a result of their predominance hermaphrodites bestowed with diverse mechanisms as members of the marine meiofauna (Martens & for achieving internal fertilization, platyhelminths Schockaert, 1986) and as parasites of vertebrate and have developed some of the most elaborate reproduc- invertebrate hosts (Poulin & Morand, 2000), two of tive systems among Metazoa (Rieger et al., 1991; the least-known reservoirs of global biodiversity. Conn, 2000). Although historically considered to retain characters A key component of this reproductive complexity is predating the diversification of Bilateria (Rieger the existence in most flatworm species and higher taxa of a condition known as ectolecithality, the *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] spatial partitioning of the products of oogenesis into 570 © 2014 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2014, 111, 570–588 ECTOLECITHALITY IN PLATYHELMINTHES 571 (C) Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/biolinnean/article/111/3/570/2415786 by guest on 30 September 2021 (D) (E) (A) (B) Figure 1. Proposed phylogenetic relationships between endolecithal, lecithoepitheliate, and euneoophoran ectole- cithal higher platyhelminth taxa (branches coloured as in Fig. 3). A, summary of Bayesian mixture model analyses of Matrix B. Nodal support values below 1 are given as posterior probabilities from a reversible-jump Markov chain Monte Carlo run for 5.747 × 107 generations, with the first 25% discarded as burn-in. Olive dots represent branches for which two lengths were fit to model heterotachy, with posterior probability > 0.9. B, summary of implied weights parsimony (k = 3) analyses of Matrix B. Nodal support values below 100 are given as the proportion of 100 symmetric resampling replicates supporting each node. C, D, E, schematic illustrations of the female reproductive system of (C) an endolecithal, (D) a gnosonesimid lecithoepitheliate, abstracted into unipartite form, and (E) a euneoophoran platyhelminth, oriented with germinal areas to the left, and the female gonopore to the right. ge, germarium (ovary); gv, germovitellarium (compound ovary/yolk gland); oc, oocyte; sg, shell glands; ut, uterus; vc, vitellocyte (yolk cell); vt, vitellarium (yolk gland) almost or entirely yolkless oocytes and separate, embryonic development. During oviposition, ectoleci- specialized yolk-bearing cells (sometimes called thal flatworms deposit hundreds of mature vitello- vitellocytes; Gremigni, 1983) (Fig. 1D, E). Indeed, cytes into thick-shelled egg capsules alongside one or only three platyhelminth higher taxa (Catenulida, several fertilized zygotes (Shinn, 1993). Development Macrostomorpha, and Polycladida) retain a plesio- then proceeds with the small, almost yolkless embryo morphic (endolecithal) condition, producing a single surrounded by these yolk cells. Although at least major cell type during oogenesis, as in most Metazoa polyclads progress through a recognizable spiralian (Fig. 1C) ( Rieger et al., 1991). Ectolecithality is also a cleavage program (Surface, 1907; Boyer, Henry & functional division: in the species that possess them, Martindale, 1998; Rawlinson, 2010), early develop- vitellocytes are largely or entirely responsible for the ment in many other flatworm taxa shows little simi- synthesis and storage of yolk and the formation of a larity to other metazoans (Martín-Durán & Egger, protective shell by marginal granules and shell gland 2012). In ectolecithal flatworms in particular, such secretions (Gremigni, 1988; Swiderski & Xylander, developmental modifications may be especially pro- 2000), which are tasks usually accomplished by the found: most taxa form a ‘hull membrane’, a transient oocyte and/or its accessory cells in other metazoa structure used to envelop and secure vitellocytes (Shinn, 1993). within or against the developing embryo, and many In further contrast to the accessory cell types groups (including planarian model systems; Sánchez (e.g. nurse cells or follicle cells) known from other Alvarado, 2003) display no trace of spiral cleavage; metazoa, flatworm vitellocytes play an active role in instead, they undergo a dispersive cleavage and ‘blas- © 2014 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2014, 111, 570–588 572 C. E. LAUMER and G. GIRIBET tomere anarchy’ in which blastomeres ephemerally F; Timoshkin, 1991a), and Gnosonesimida, a rare lose physical contact and develop adrift in a matrix of meiobenthic group of six species presently classified external, syncytial yolk. Although almost nothing is in the single genus Gnosonesima, known from shallow known about the developmental mechanisms under- (intertidal to 350 m) marine sediments (Fig. 2D) lying these processes (in large part because of diffi- (Karling, 1968). The sole hypothesized synapomorphy culties in observing and manipulating ectolecithal of these taxa is the structure of their female gonads, embryos within their capsules), these modifications which are organized as chains of follicles, each con- have been explained in evolutionary terms as embry- sisting of a layer of vitellocytes more or less tightly onic adaptations to the presence of external yolk enveloping single oocytes, thus organized as the (Thomas, 1986; Martín-Durán & Egger, 2012). consequence of a common germinative zone for Ectolecithality is also associated with increased func- vitellocytes and oocytes in this taxon (Fig. 1D) (Rieger Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/biolinnean/article/111/3/570/2415786 by guest on 30 September 2021 tional compartmentalization in the adult reproductive et al., 1991). Historically, the tetrapartite germovi- morphology of most taxa: among the major lineage of tellaria of Gnosonesima was proposed to represent parasitic Platyhelminthes (Neodermata) in particular, the primitive condition from which other ectolecithal the presence of ectolecithality has allowed a spectacu- taxa diverged (Reisinger, 1926); later systematists lar anatomical specialization of female reproductive have followed this convention, placing a monophy- organs (exemplified by the compound assembly of letic Lecithoepitheliata as the sister group to the an egg capsule in the digenean ootype; Ehlers, 1985; remaining Neoophora, a hypothesis that persists Coil, Harrison & Bogitsh, 1991; Fried & Haseeb, to the present (Martín-Durán
Recommended publications
  • Platyhelminthes, Nemertea, and "Aschelminthes" - A
    BIOLOGICAL SCIENCE FUNDAMENTALS AND SYSTEMATICS – Vol. III - Platyhelminthes, Nemertea, and "Aschelminthes" - A. Schmidt-Rhaesa PLATYHELMINTHES, NEMERTEA, AND “ASCHELMINTHES” A. Schmidt-Rhaesa University of Bielefeld, Germany Keywords: Platyhelminthes, Nemertea, Gnathifera, Gnathostomulida, Micrognathozoa, Rotifera, Acanthocephala, Cycliophora, Nemathelminthes, Gastrotricha, Nematoda, Nematomorpha, Priapulida, Kinorhyncha, Loricifera Contents 1. Introduction 2. General Morphology 3. Platyhelminthes, the Flatworms 4. Nemertea (Nemertini), the Ribbon Worms 5. “Aschelminthes” 5.1. Gnathifera 5.1.1. Gnathostomulida 5.1.2. Micrognathozoa (Limnognathia maerski) 5.1.3. Rotifera 5.1.4. Acanthocephala 5.1.5. Cycliophora (Symbion pandora) 5.2. Nemathelminthes 5.2.1. Gastrotricha 5.2.2. Nematoda, the Roundworms 5.2.3. Nematomorpha, the Horsehair Worms 5.2.4. Priapulida 5.2.5. Kinorhyncha 5.2.6. Loricifera Acknowledgements Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary UNESCO – EOLSS This chapter provides information on several basal bilaterian groups: flatworms, nemerteans, Gnathifera,SAMPLE and Nemathelminthes. CHAPTERS These include species-rich taxa such as Nematoda and Platyhelminthes, and as taxa with few or even only one species, such as Micrognathozoa (Limnognathia maerski) and Cycliophora (Symbion pandora). All Acanthocephala and subgroups of Platyhelminthes and Nematoda, are parasites that often exhibit complex life cycles. Most of the taxa described are marine, but some have also invaded freshwater or the terrestrial environment. “Aschelminthes” are not a natural group, instead, two taxa have been recognized that were earlier summarized under this name. Gnathifera include taxa with a conspicuous jaw apparatus such as Gnathostomulida, Micrognathozoa, and Rotifera. Although they do not possess a jaw apparatus, Acanthocephala also belong to Gnathifera due to their epidermal structure. ©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) BIOLOGICAL SCIENCE FUNDAMENTALS AND SYSTEMATICS – Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Management Hierarchy (Classification) for the Catalogue of Life
    TOWARDS A MANAGEMENT HIERARCHY (CLASSIFICATION) FOR THE CATALOGUE OF LIFE Draft Discussion Document Rationale The Catalogue of Life partnership, comprising Species 2000 and ITIS (Integrated Taxonomic Information System), has the goal of achieving a comprehensive catalogue of all known species on Earth by the year 2011. The actual number of described species (after correction for synonyms) is not presently known but estimates suggest about 1.8 million species. The collaborative teams behind the Catalogue of Life need an agreed standard classification for these 1.8 million species, i.e. a working hierarchy for management purposes. This discussion document is intended to highlight some of the issues that need clarifying in order to achieve this goal beyond what we presently have. Concerning Classification Life’s diversity is classified into a hierarchy of categories. The best-known of these is the Kingdom. When Carl Linnaeus introduced his new “system of nature” in the 1750s ― Systema Naturae per Regna tria naturae, secundum Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species …) ― he recognised three kingdoms, viz Plantae, Animalia, and a third kingdom for minerals that has long since been abandoned. As is evident from the title of his work, he introduced lower-level taxonomic categories, each successively nested in the other, named Class, Order, Genus, and Species. The most useful and innovative aspect of his system (which gave rise to the scientific discipline of Systematics) was the use of the binominal, comprising genus and species, that uniquely identified each species of organism. Linnaeus’s system has proven to be robust for some 250 years. The starting point for botanical names is his Species Plantarum, published in 1753, and that for zoological names is the tenth edition of the Systema Naturae published in 1758.
    [Show full text]
  • The Interrelationships of Metazoan Parasites: a Review of Phylum- and Higher-Level Hypotheses from Recent Morphological and Molecular Phylogenetic Analyses
    FOLIA PARASITOLOGICA 48: 81-103, 2001 The interrelationships of metazoan parasites: a review of phylum- and higher-level hypotheses from recent morphological and molecular phylogenetic analyses Jan Zrzavý Department of Zoology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of South Bohemia, and Institute of Entomology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Branišovská 31, 370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic Key words: phylogeny, parasitism, Myxozoa, Mesozoa, Neodermata, Myzostomida, Seisonida, Acanthocephala, Pentastomida, Nematomorpha, Nematoda Abstract. Phylogeny of seven groups of metazoan parasitic groups is reviewed, based on both morphological and molecular data. The Myxozoa (=Malacosporea + Myxosporea) are most probably related to the egg-parasitic cnidarian Polypodium (Hydrozoa?: Polypodiozoa); the other phylogenetic hypotheses are discussed and the possible non-monophyly of the Cnidaria (with the Polypodiozoa-Myxozoa clade closest to the Triploblastica) is suggested. The Mesozoa is a monophyletic group, possibly closely related to the (monophyletic) Acoelomorpha; whether the Acoelomorpha and Mesozoa represent the basalmost triploblast clade(s) or a derived platyhelminth subclade may depend on rooting the tree of the Triploblastica. Position of the monophyletic Neodermata (=Trematoda + Cercomeromorpha) within the rhabditophoran flatworms is discussed, with two major alternative hypotheses about the neodermatan sister-group relationships (viz., the “neoophoran” and “revertospermatan”). The Myzostomida are not annelids but belong among the Platyzoa, possibly to the clade of animals with anterior sperm flagella (=Prosomastigozoa). The Acanthocephala represent derived syndermates (“rotifers”), possibly related to Seison (the name Pararotatoria comb. n. is proposed for Seisonida + Acanthocephala). The crustacean origin of the Pentastomida based on spermatological and molecular evidence (Pentastomida + Branchiura = Ichthyostraca) is confronted with palaeontological views favouring the pre-arthropod derivation of the pentastomids.
    [Show full text]
  • Neodermata: Gyrocotylidea)
    FOLIA PARASITOLOGICA 57[3]: 173–184, 2010 © Institute of Parasitology, Biology Centre ASCR ISSN 0015-5683 (print), ISSN 1803-6465 (online) http://www.paru.cas.cz/folia/ Ultrastructure of the ovarian follicles, oviducts and oocytes of Gyrocotyle urna (Neodermata: Gyrocotylidea) Larisa G. Poddubnaya1, Roman Kuchta2, Tomáš Scholz2 and Willi E.R. Xylander3 1 Institute of Biology of Inland Waters, Russian Academy of Sciences, 152742 Borok, Yaroslavl Province, Russia; 2 Institute of Parasitology, Biology Centre of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Branišovská 31, 370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic; 3 Senckenberg Museum für Naturkunde Görlitz, Postfach 300 154, 02806 Görlitz, Germany Abstract: An ultrastructural study of the ovarian follicles and their associated oviducts of the cestode Gyrocotyle urna Grube et Wagener, 1852, a parasite from the spiral valve of the rabbit fish,Chimaera monstrosa L., was undertaken. Each follicle gives rise to follicular oviduct, which opens into one of the five collecting ducts, through which pass mature oocytes. These collecting ducts open into an ovarian receptacle which, in turn, opens via a muscular sphincter (the oocapt) to the main oviduct. The maturation of oocytes surrounded by the syncytial interstitial cells within the ovarian follicles of G. urna follows a pattern similar to that in Eucestoda. The ooplasm of mature oocytes contain lipid droplets (2.0 × 1.8 µm) and cortical granules (0.26 × 0.19 µm). The cytoplasm of primary and secondary oocytes contains centrioles, indicating the presence of the so-called “centriole cycle” during ������������������������oocyte �����������������divisions. A mor- phological variation between different oviducts was observed. The luminal surface of the follicular and the collecting oviducts is smooth.
    [Show full text]
  • Mines, France, and Onychophoran Terrestrialization
    Carboniferous Onychophora from Montceau#les#Mines, France, and onychophoran terrestrialization The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Garwood, Russell J., Gregory D. Edgecombe, Sylvain Charbonnier, Dominique Chabard, Daniel Sotty, and Gonzalo Giribet. 2016. “Carboniferous Onychophora from Montceau#les#Mines, France, and onychophoran terrestrialization.” Invertebrate Biology 135 (3): 179-190. doi:10.1111/ivb.12130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ivb.12130. Published Version doi:10.1111/ivb.12130 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:29408380 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Invertebrate Biology 135(3): 179–190. © 2016 The Authors. Invertebrate Biology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Microscopical Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. DOI: 10.1111/ivb.12130 Carboniferous Onychophora from Montceau-les-Mines, France, and onychophoran terrestrialization Russell J. Garwood,1,2,a Gregory D. Edgecombe,2 Sylvain Charbonnier,3 Dominique Chabard,4 Daniel Sotty,4 and Gonzalo Giribet5,6 1School of Earth, Atmospheric and
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Phylogeny and the Ancestry of Bilaterians: Inferences from Morphology and 18S Rdna Gene Sequences
    EVOLUTION & DEVELOPMENT 3:3, 170–205 (2001) Animal phylogeny and the ancestry of bilaterians: inferences from morphology and 18S rDNA gene sequences Kevin J. Peterson and Douglas J. Eernisse* Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover NH 03755, USA; and *Department of Biological Science, California State University, Fullerton CA 92834-6850, USA *Author for correspondence (email: [email protected]) SUMMARY Insight into the origin and early evolution of the and protostomes, with ctenophores the bilaterian sister- animal phyla requires an understanding of how animal group, whereas 18S rDNA suggests that the root is within the groups are related to one another. Thus, we set out to explore Lophotrochozoa with acoel flatworms and gnathostomulids animal phylogeny by analyzing with maximum parsimony 138 as basal bilaterians, and with cnidarians the bilaterian sister- morphological characters from 40 metazoan groups, and 304 group. We suggest that this basal position of acoels and gna- 18S rDNA sequences, both separately and together. Both thostomulids is artifactal because for 1000 replicate phyloge- types of data agree that arthropods are not closely related to netic analyses with one random sequence as outgroup, the annelids: the former group with nematodes and other molting majority root with an acoel flatworm or gnathostomulid as the animals (Ecdysozoa), and the latter group with molluscs and basal ingroup lineage. When these problematic taxa are elim- other taxa with spiral cleavage. Furthermore, neither brachi- inated from the matrix, the combined analysis suggests that opods nor chaetognaths group with deuterostomes; brachiopods the root lies between the deuterostomes and protostomes, are allied with the molluscs and annelids (Lophotrochozoa), and Ctenophora is the bilaterian sister-group.
    [Show full text]
  • Symposia and Workshops in Malacology
    Revision: February 2021 Annotated Catalog of Malacological Meetings, Including Symposia and Workshops in Malacology Eugene V. Coan Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, 2559 Puesta del Sol Road, Santa Barbara, California 93105, U.S.A.; [email protected] & Alan R. Kabat Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University; [email protected] ABSTRACT As a much needed bibliographic tool, an annotated catalog is given of the symposia and workshops that have been held at malacological and generalist meetings over the past eight decades, together with their resulting publications. Particularly detailed emphasis is given to the meetings of Unitas Malacologica, the American Malacological Union/Society, and the Western Society of Malacologists. INTRODUCTION This paper catalogues the symposia and workshops that have taken place at malacological meetings over the last eight decades, as well as those that have occurred at other venues. The publications that resulted from these meetings and symposia are listed, chiefly because this information can be difficult for researchers to obtain. This catalog is not complete, and it emphasizes natural history and systematics. We have not endeavored to document every malacological meeting, particularly those before 1930, and those of European and Asian national societies that do not seem to have had symposia or have resulted in publications. Moreover, we have not thoroughly covered meetings on shellfisheries, mariculture, agricultural or other pests, and mollusk-borne diseases, nor those of shell-collectors’ groups. These organizations may want to provide their own listings for the historical record. In 1996, when this paper was originally published (Coan & Kabat, 1996), we did not include symposia, meetings, and workshops relating to the Cephalopoda, other than those occurring at Unitas Malacologica, the American Malacological Society, or other meetings already covered in detail as we did not have sufficient information about them.
    [Show full text]
  • The Opiliones Tree of Life: Shedding Light on Harvestmen Relationships Through Transcriptomics
    The Opiliones tree of life: shedding light on harvestmen relationships through transcriptomics The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Fernández, Rosa, Prashant P. Sharma, Ana Lúcia Tourinho, and Gonzalo Giribet. 2017. “The Opiliones tree of life: shedding light on harvestmen relationships through transcriptomics.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 284 (1849): 20162340. doi:10.1098/rspb.2016.2340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/ rspb.2016.2340. Published Version doi:10.1098/rspb.2016.2340 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:32072171 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA The Opiliones tree of life: shedding light rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org on harvestmen relationships through transcriptomics Rosa Ferna´ndez1, Prashant P. Sharma2, Ana Lu´cia Tourinho1,3 Research and Gonzalo Giribet1 Cite this article: Ferna´ndez R, Sharma PP, 1Museum of Comparative Zoology, Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Tourinho AL, Giribet G. 2017 The Opiliones tree 26 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA of life: shedding light on harvestmen 2Department of Zoology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 352 Birge Hall, 430 Lincoln Drive, Madison, WI 53706, USA relationships through transcriptomics. 3Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazoˆnia, Coordenac¸a˜o de Biodiversidade (CBIO), Avenida Andre´ Arau´jo, Proc. R. Soc. B 284: 20162340. 2936, Aleixo, CEP 69011-970, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.2340 RF, 0000-0002-4719-6640; GG, 0000-0002-5467-8429 Opiliones are iconic arachnids with a Palaeozoic origin and a diversity that reflects ancient biogeographic patterns dating back at least to the times of Received: 25 October 2016 Pangea.
    [Show full text]
  • Arthropod Phylogeny Based on Eight Molecular Loci and Morphology
    letters to nature melanogaster (U37541), mosquito Anopheles quadrimaculatus (L04272), mosquito arthropods revealed by the expression pattern of Hox genes in a spider. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, Anopheles gambiae (L20934), med¯y Ceratitis capitata (CCA242872), Cochliomyia homi- 10665±10670 (1998). nivorax (AF260826), locust Locusta migratoria (X80245), honey bee Apis mellifera 24. Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G. & Gibson, T. J. CLUSTALW: Improving the sensitivity of progressive (L06178), brine shrimp Artemia franciscana (X69067), water ¯ea Daphnia pulex multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-speci®c gap penalties and weight (AF117817), shrimp Penaeus monodon (AF217843), hermit crab Pagurus longicarpus matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 4673±4680 (1994). (AF150756), horseshoe crab Limulus polyphemus (AF216203), tick Ixodes hexagonus 25. Foster, P. G. & Hickey, D. A. Compositional bias may affect both DNA-based and protein-based (AF081828), tick Rhipicephalus sanguineus (AF081829). For outgroup comparison, phylogenetic reconstructions. J. Mol. Evol. 48, 284±290 (1999). sequences were retrieved for the annelid Lumbricus terrestris (U24570), the mollusc 26. Castresana, J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic Katharina tunicata (U09810), the nematodes Caenorhabditis elegans (X54252), Ascaris analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17, 540±552 (2000). suum (X54253), Trichinella spiralis (AF293969) and Onchocerca volvulus (AF015193), and 27. Muse, S. V. & Kosakovsky Pond, S. L. Hy-Phy 0.7 b (North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, 2000). the vertebrate species Homo sapiens (J01415) and Xenopus laevis (M10217). Additional 28. Strimmer, K. & von Haeseler, A. Quartet puzzlingÐa quartet maximum-likelihood method for sequences were analysed for gene arrangements: Boophilus microplus (AF110613), Euhadra reconstructing tree topologies.
    [Show full text]
  • Gonzalo Giribet, Editor-In-Chief
    Gonzalo Giribet, Editor-in-Chief Gonzalo Giribet received his PhD in arthropod phylogenetics by the Universitat de Barcelona (1997) and then conducted postdoctoral research at the American Museum of Natural History, in New York. In 2000 he joined the Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology at Harvard University first as Assistant Professor, became Associate Professor in 2004 and then Professor in 2007. He is now the Alexander Agassiz Professor of Zoology in the Museum of Comparative Zoology. He is also a Fellow of the California Academy of Sciences, a Research Associate at the American Museum of Natural History (New York) and at the Field Museum of Natural History (Chicago), and an Affiliate at the Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT. Dr Giribet’s research interests centre around understanding invertebrate evolution and biogeography with special foci on reconstructing the Tree of Life, and on the diversification of Gondwanan faunas. Shane Ahyong, Associate Editor Shane Ahyong received his Ph.D. from the University of New South Wales in 2000 and was a postdoctoral fellow at the Australian Museum, Sydney, prior to joining the National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research, New Zealand, in 2006, managing the Marine Biodiversity & Biosecurity Group and Marine Invasives Taxonomic Service (MITS). He returned to Australia in 2010 and is a Principal Research Scientist and Manager of the Department of Marine Invertebrates at the Australian Museum, and an Adjunct Professor at the University of New South Wales. Dr Ahyong’s research revolves around the phylogenetics, systematics and biogeography of aquatic invertebrates, primarily marine and freshwater crustaceans worldwide, in addition to marine invasive species.
    [Show full text]
  • Bruno A. S. De Medeiros, Ph.D. Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute Panama City, Panama [email protected]
    Bruno A. S. de Medeiros, Ph.D. Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute Panama City, Panama [email protected] www.brunodemedeiros.me RESEARCH INTERESTS I am an evolutionary biologist interested in the role of species interactions in creating and maintaining diversity, using plants and their insect flower visitors as model systems. My research involves fieldwork, systematics, natural history, and evolutionary genomics. EDUCATION AND APPOINTMENTS 2020- Postdoctoral Fellow, Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama Main supervisor: E. Allen Herre Project: Why do generalist palms have specialized brood pollinators? 2020- Research Associate, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University 2018-2019 Postdoctoral Fellow, Dept. of Organismic & Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University Supervisors: Brian Farrell and Gonzalo Giribet Projects: Insect population genomics, Phylogenomics of Ecdysozoa 2018 Ph.D. in Organismic & Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University Thesis: The Evolution of Syagrus palms and their insect pollinators Faculty Advisor: Brian D. Farrell 2011 M.Sc. in Zoology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil Thesis: Phylogenetic analysis and systematic revision of the genus Anchylorhynchus Schoenherr, 1836 (Curculionidae: Derelomini), using discrete and continuous morphological characters Faculty Advisor: Sergio A. Vanin 2008 B.Sc. in Biological Sciences, University of São Paulo Thesis: Insect attraction to artificial lighting, focusing on Coleoptera Faculty Advisor: Sergio A. Vanin PUBLICATIONS Preprints and in review 1. Church SH, de Medeiros BAS, Donoughe S, Reyes NLM, Extavour CG. 2020. Repeated loss of variation in insect ovary morphology highlights the role of developmental constraint in life-history evolution. bioRxiv. DOI: 10.1101/2020.07.07.191940 Peer-reviewed 1. Chamorro L, de Medeiros BAS, Farrell BD. 2021. First phylogenetic analysis of Dryophthorinae (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) based on structural alignment of ribosomal DNA reveals Cenozoic diversification.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 ROSA FERNANDEZ, Ph.D. [email protected]
    ROSA FERNANDEZ, Ph.D. [email protected] Museum of Comparative Zoology Harvard University 26 Oxford St. Cambridge, MA 02138 Phone (617) 496-5308 CURRENT POSITION Harvard University Cambridge, MA Research Associate September 2015 – Present EDUCATION Complutense University Madrid, Spain PhD, Biology of Conservation 2011 Dissertation: Insights into the evolutionary biology of a cosmopolitan earthworm: phylogeography, phylogeny and reproductive biology in Aporrectodea trapezoides (Oligochaeta: Lumbricidae). MSc, Biology. 2009 BS, Biology. 2006 FELLOWSHIPS, GRANTS AND AWARDS NSF grant #1457539 (PIs: Prof. Gonzalo Giribet, Prof. Gustavo Hormiga)* 2015-2017 Phylogeny and diversification of the orb weaving spiders (Araneae) Star Family Postdoctoral FelloW 2014 Harvard University Putnam Expedition Grant (PI: Rosa Fernández) 2014 Exploring cryptic diversity in soil animals (II): centipedes and velvet worms. Putnam Foundation, Harvard University ($ 12,354) Postdoctoral Award for Professional Development 2014 Harvard University ($ 1,000) Putnam Expedition Grant (PI: Rosa Fernández) 2013 Exploring cryptic diversity in soil animals (I): harvestmen and earthworms. 1 Putnam Foundation, Harvard University ($10,385) Postdoctoral Award 2012 Ramón Areces Foundation (€ 67,200) Postdoctoral Award 2012 Caja Madrid Foundation (€ 36,000) Predoctoral AWard for Professional Development 2009, 2010 Complutense University (€ 5,100 in 2009) (€ 5,000 in 2010) Honorary Research FelloW 2007-2011 Complutense University, Department of Zoology and Physical Anthropology Predoctoral FelloWship 2007 Complutense University / Ministry of Education, Spain Departmental Collaboration Grant 2006 Ministry of Education, Spain (€ 3,000) *As a Postdoctoral Fellow at Harvard University I participated in the planning, writing and management of this grant, but could not be listed as PI due to eligibility restrictions to non- teaching staff (for verification, see below contact information for Prof.
    [Show full text]