Jean Dubuffet. Nez D'apollo Pap. 1953. Collection of Dieter Scharf In

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Jean Dubuffet. Nez D'apollo Pap. 1953. Collection of Dieter Scharf In Jean Dubuffet. Nez d’Apollo Pap. 1953. Collection of Dieter Scharf in memory of Otto Gerstenberg, Kupferstichkabinett Berlin. © 2007 Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York/ADAGP, Paris. Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/octo.2007.119.1.46 by guest on 27 September 2021 Jean Dubuffet: The Butterfly Man* SARAH K. RICH The Massacre Why does he massacre butterflies to evoke effects he would better achieve with paint and brushes? —R. D., L’Information, February 19541 Good question. “R. D.” was not the only one who asked it. Many critics puzzled over Jean Dubuffet’s butterfly wing collages when they were first shown at the Galerie Rive Gauche in December of 1953. Though the exhibition “Démons et merveilles” showcased veteran surrealists like Max Ernst, Joan Miró, and Dorothea Tanning, as well as slightly younger figures like Henri Michaux, Dubuffet’s contri- bution of eight collages dominated critical responses and were the only works to be illustrated in reviews.2 Gaudy heaps of fritillaries, tiger moths, blues, swallowtails, and clouded yel- lows, most of which had been hunted down in the French Alps that fall, the collages lacked the decorum typical for the display of such specimens, to the great distress of most art critics. Dubuffet had not, for example, used a separating board to part the tender wings and keep the bodies intact. Instead, he had ripped the * I would like to thank Yve-Alain Bois as well as my colleagues Charlotte Houghton, Nancy Locke, Christopher Campbell, and Leo Mazow for their helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper. I am especially grateful to Sophie Webel, Director of the Foundation Dubuffet, who made archival sources per- taining to the collages available to me in the summer of 2003. I also benefitted tremendously from insights and bibliographical information that Kent Minturn shared with me during my work on this arti- cle. This paper was first presented as a lecture in the History of Art and Architecture Department, Harvard University, September 29, 2005. 1. R. D., “Démons et merveilles,” L’Information (February 15, 1954), reprinted in Max Loreau, Catalogue des Travaux de Jean Dubuffet, vol. 9 (Paris: Jean-Jacques Pauvert, 1968), p. 105. All translations from the French are mine unless otherwise noted. 2. The title of the exhibition was derived from a poem by Jacques Prévert, “Sables Mouvants,” in which the phrase “Démons et merveilles, Vents et marées” is used several times to introduce different metaphors for a lover. See Jacques Prévert, Paroles (Paris: Gallimard, 1949), p. 186. The exhibition was curated by René Bertelé, who had been pivotal in the publication of Prévert’s Paroles. OCTOBER 119, Winter 2007, pp. 46–74. © 2007 October Magazine, Ltd. and Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/octo.2007.119.1.46 by guest on 27 September 2021 48 OCTOBER Dubuffet. Belle au regard masqué. 1953. Collection of Dieter Scharf in memory of Otto Gerstenberg, Kupferstichkabinett Berlin. © 2007 Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York/ADAGP, Paris. poor critters apart and distributed their fragmentary remains on 25 by 18 cm pieces of paperboard without regard for entomological organization.3 And, in apparent denial of the gruesome process by which his works had come into being, Dubuffet had exploited the insect remnants simply to compose blithe little figure studies and seemingly anodyne landscapes.4 Three reviews condemned Dubuffet’s contribution to the show as a “mas- sacre,” which suggests that the word might have buzzed around the exhibition’s opening reception as well. The critic writing for L’Express, for example, com- plained that works like Nez d’Apollo Pap (1953) seemed a veritable harvest of death, as the artist “uselessly massacred hundreds of butterflies with which he covered the faces of the monsters that haunt him.” A critic in Médium going by the initials J.-L. B. would see the collages as another of Dubuffet’s experiments in abjection and debasement, though to that critic the project seemed a waste of materials: Poor Dubuffet who, with a hundred massacred butterflies, only knows how to make a rough, “informe” effigy.5 3. A memo dated Saturday, December 5, 1953, lists the following butterfly collages lent by Jean Dubuffet to Rudi Augustincic at the Rive Gauche Gallery for the “Démons et merveilles” show: Dame agée, Homme aux dents jaunes, Vache et vacher, Profil d’homme, Femme et chien, Homme au bouquet, Dame masqué (Belle au regard. .), Jeux. The document is located in the Augustincic file at the Fondation Jean Dubuffet, Paris. 4. “Démons et merveilles,” L’Express, no. 34 ( January 9, 1954), p. 10. Reviews of this show were omitted from the otherwise comprehensive bibliography provided by the recent retrospective catalog organized by Daniel Abadie, Dubuffet (Paris: Centre Pompidou, 2001). 5. J.-L. B., “Les Papillons sont au-dessous de ça,” Médium (February 1954), p. 22. Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/octo.2007.119.1.46 by guest on 27 September 2021 Jean Dubuffet: The Butterfly Man 49 Dubuffet. Personnage en ailes de papillons. 1953. Smithsonian Institution, Joseph H. Hirschhorn Purchase Fund Gerstenberg. © 2007 Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York/ADAGP, Paris. An anonymous critic writing for Arts was so daring as to avoid the terminology of the “massacre” in his review, though he came to the same general conclusion regarding the uselessness of the slaughter: Dubuffet has unleashed himself upon butterflies, seizing their wings and gluing them in a terrible mess. One can’t help but think that butterfly wings—such marvels—are sufficient on their own, in their form and beauty, and that the artist’s process is useless and cruel.6 This reviewer was a bit more explicit than the others in describing the specific offense of the collages. According to him, the carnage of Dubuffet’s collages was use- less—and for a couple of reasons. The first was tied up in the benign aesthetic that critics perceived in the noninstrumental beauty of butterflies proper. They were just such lovely creatures on their own, why bother trying to improve upon them? Then, as it was impossible to enhance a butterfly’s beauty, the insect’s aesthetic quality was degraded by a less noble kind of uselessness—that of the superfluous kill. In their fancy for sweet little butterflies, and their disgust at the cruel artist who had cut short their aesthetically pleasing lives, these critics might have been happier with modernism’s other treatment of the butterfly—that provided by some- one like J. A. M. Whistler. After all, the butterflies with which Whistler typically signed his canvases and decorated his personal effects were indisputably light and 6. “Démons et merveilles: Toiles surréalistes,” Arts, no. 443 (December 24, 1953), p. 6. Downloaded from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/octo.2007.119.1.46 by guest on 27 September 2021 50 OCTOBER pretty. Confections of the air, they advertised social buoyancy and expressed a wit unburdened by the tedium of bourgeois morality. Even better, those butterflies lit- eralized the flatness of Whistler’s compositions. When pinned to his canvases, their surface effects dissuaded the viewer’s gaze from penetrating the three- dimensional space of his paintings. And the delicate tracery of Whistler’s butter- flies was most enjoyable when the insects were spread open, emphasizing the two-dimensionality of his compositions proper. As they were flattened, the insects’ wings were also captured within a self-contained representational system that reit- erated the autonomy of the modernist canvas: the two wings of Whistler’s butterflies would “represent” only each other, mirroring (in this context) their decorative design along a vertical axis. Part of the problem, however, was that the insects on Dubuffet’s collages weren’t so much flat as they were squashed—or at least their flatness recalled the process of squashing by which one typically kills an insect. That was the massacre. So if the conspicuous presence of the wings on the surface of the works, in good modernist fashion, may have called attention to the two-dimensionality of the col- lages (as did the lack of shading and perspective in the compositions), the very facticity of the dead bugs made it impossible to ignore the extermination neces- sary for that flatness to have been achieved. Like Dubuffet’s road-kill nudes of the late forties and fifties, in which women’s bodies appear to have been steamrolled into two dimensions (or, one might now say, in which those bodies seem to have been “butterfly cut” up the back, with the sides of the carcass peeled open to face the front), the butterfly collages obtained flatness through an unavoidable brutal- ity. Pretty yet catastrophic, iridescent yet lifeless, Dubuffet’s exuberant massacres punctured the superficiality of the butterfly with the depth of a grave. Worse yet, as far as critics were concerned, such brutality apparently yielded no special result, as Dubuffet didn’t seem to have done anything new with the insect corpses. Rather, the collages reproduced pictorial effects common to Dubuffet’s paintings. Like his “. Plus beaux qu’ils croient” portraits of French intellectuals from the mid-forties, the butterfly collages mustered a number of compositional gimmicks that Dubuffet typically exploited to produce the effect of naiveté. As in those earlier portraits, the upper margin of space with which portraits usually cushion the head of a sitter is notably absent in Nez d’Apollo Pap, and the oversized head dwarfs his puny arms. Further, it seems as if the figure’s right arm is bending only because it is forced into a detour by the frame, giving the calculated impression that the artist had incorrectly estimated the amount of space he would need to complete the figure.
Recommended publications
  • Calder / Dubuffet Entre Ciel Et Terre Entre Ciel Et Terre © Evans/Three Lions/Getty Images/Hulton Archive © Pierre Vauthey/Sygma/Corbis /Preface Foreword
    CALDER / DUBUFFET ENTRE CIEL ET TERRE ENTRE CIEL ET TERRE © Evans/Three Lions/Getty Images/Hulton Archive © Pierre Vauthey/Sygma/Corbis /PREFACE FOREWORD/ Opera Gallery Genève est heureuse de présenter une exposition exceptionnelle regroupant des œuvres de deux Opera Gallery Geneva is pleased to present an exceptional exhibition with works by two giants of the 20th century: géants du 20ème siècle : Alexander Calder et Jean Dubuffet. Au premier regard, leurs parcours et œuvres sont bien Alexander Calder and Jean Dubuffet. At first glance, their careers and work are very different, but a lot of elements différents, pourtant beaucoup d’éléments les rapprochent. draw them together. Ces deux artistes sont de la même génération mais ne se sont jamais rencontrés. Alexander Calder était These two artists are from the same generation but never met. Alexander Calder was American and Jean Dubuffet américain et Jean Dubuffet français. les deux ont vécu leurs vies artistiques des deux côtés de l’Atlantique. was French. Both have lived their artists’ lives travelling from one continent to the other. Both have been, at les deux ont été, au début de leurs carrières respectives, considérés comme des “outsiders” dans leurs propres the beginning of their respective careers considered as “outsiders” in their own country but their talent was pays mais leur talent a été immédiatement reconnu en France pour Calder et aux etats-Unis pour Dubuffet. immediately acknowledged in France for Calder and in America for Dubuffet. tous deux ont “révolutionné” l’art dit conventionnel grâce à une utilisation audacieuse de techniques et matériaux Both have revolutionized conventional art by an audacious use of informal techniques and materials.
    [Show full text]
  • JEAN DUBUFFET Brutal Beauty
    JEAN DUBUFFET BRutaL beautY JEAN DUBUFFET BRutaL beautY EDITED BY ELEANOR NAIRNE PRESTEL MUNICH • LONDON • NEW YORK CONTENTS FOREWORD 7 MATTER AND MEMORY 11 TRUE FACE 37 BEAUTY AND THE BRUT, ELEANOR NAIRNE 50 LADIES’ BODIES 57 MENTAL LANDSCAPES 71 BEAUTY DEGREE ZERO, KENT MITCHELL MINTURN 80 THE GARDEN 87 PRECARIOUS LIFE 101 STATUES ALSO LIVE: JEAN DUBUFFET’S PRECARIOUS, CREATURELY LIFE, RACHEL E. PERRY 118 TEXTUROLOGY 125 PARIS CIRCUS 137 SCINTILLATING MATTER, SEETHING LIFE: FROM THE ‘TEXTUROLOGIES’ TO ‘PARIS CIRCUS’, SARAH WILSON 144 ART BRUT, 1945 151 THE COLLECTION RETURNS 171 JEAN DUBUFFET: THE ARTIST AND ART BRUT – DEEP-ROOTED RELATIONSHIPS, SARAH LOMBARDI 190 L’HOURLOUPE 197 COUCOU BAZAR 207 THE HIGH SEAS OF L’HOURLOUPE, SOPHIE BERREBI 214 THEATRES OF MEMORY 221 NON-PLACE 235 THE SWALLOW AND THE DAGGER, CAMILLE HOUZÉ 244 CHRONOLOGY, CAMILLE HOUZÉ 251 LIST OF WORKS 270 ENDNOTES 273 AUTHOR BIOGRAPHIES 283 INDEX 284 IMAGE CREDITS 286 6 FOREWORD Jean Dubuffet wrote ‘Notes for the Well-Read’ in 1945, soon after Dubuffet’s experimental drive won him the admiration of an array he devoted himself to becoming an artist.1 The text is made up of of younger artists – from Claes Oldenburg to Paula Rego, David a sequence of exhortations, organized under amusing subtitles Hockney, Eva Hesse, Robert Smithson, Chuck Close, Mike Kelley, that reflect many of the concerns that would captivate him for the Keith Haring and Jean-Michel Basquiat. It is surprising, then, that rest of his career: ‘Animate the Material’, ‘Even More Hazardous’, a major overview
    [Show full text]
  • Teacher Resource
    Jean Dubuffet Brutal Beauty Teachers’ Resource 1 Jean Dubuffet, Landscape with Argus (Paysage aux argus), August 1955, Collection Fondation Dubuffet, Paris © 2021 ADAGP, Paris/DACS, London Using this Resource Contents List Introducing Dubuffet This Teachers’ Resource complements the Barbican Art Gallery exhibition Jean Dubuffet: Brutal Beauty but can also be used for Street Art exploring both the work of Jean Dubuffet and Art Brut artists Alchemy and Enchantment without visiting the exhibition in person. This resource is: Art Brut • Divided into thematic sections that reflect key aspects of Dubuffet’s Bodies and Landscapes creative life and work. These sections can be used as starting points for the Fantastical Creatures exploration of thoughts and ideas centred on Dubuffet’s work, with example questions for discussion with students. Inspired by Dubuffet’s endlessly playful Doodles and Parallel Universes and experimental spirit, each section includes ideas for students’ own creative Examples of further resources work, self-expression and imaginative enquiry – as Dubuffet believed, an artist can be anyone who can communicate their feelings or ideas well. • Has Ask and Explore sections that give questions and creative Your Visit activities to explore in the Gallery itself or in the classroom. Art Gallery, Barbican Centre Mon 17 May–Sun 22 Aug 2021 • Aimed at primary and secondary school teachers, further 10am–7pm daily education tutors, and leaders of arts and youth groups. It is appropriate for Key Stages 2–5 with links across the curriculum including Entry to Barbican Art Gallery is free for all students in Key Stages Art and Design (in particular), Literacy, PSHE, Citizenship, 1-3.
    [Show full text]
  • Jean Dubuffets Art Brut.! the Origins of the Collection
    Pascal-Désir Maisonneuve (1863 – 1934), Der Tartar, zw. 1927 und 1928, Assemblage verschiedener Muschelschalen, Foto: Claude Bornand, AN, Collection de l‘Art Brut, Lausanne Claude Bornand, AN, Collection de l‘Art Muschelschalen, Foto: verschiedener 1927 und 1928, Assemblage zw. (1863 – 1934), Der Tartar, Maisonneuve Pascal-Désir jean dubuffets art brut.! the origins of the collection January 25, 2017 – July 2, 2017 An exhibition by the press contact: Mag.a Edith Wildmann museum gugging Am Campus 2 3400 Maria Gugging T: +43 664 60499 374 e-mail: [email protected] www.gugging.at [jean dubuffets art brut.! the origins of the collection jean dubuffets art brut.! the origins of the collection An exhibition by the Collection de l’Art Brut, Lausanne curator: Sarah Lombardi scientific collaboration: Jean Dubuffet rue de Vaugirard, ca 1946, Photo: © J. Astrid Berglund Cordier /Archives Fondation Dubuffet, Paris PRESS BREAKFAST: January 25, 2017, 10 a.m. OPENING: January 25, 2017, 7 p.m. with curator Sarah Lombardi (Collection de l‘Art Brut, Lausanne) DURATION: January 25 – July 2, 2017 Real art is always there where it is not expected! (Jean Dubuffet) 1945 marked the end of the Second World War and the beginning of a second moder- nism. At this point in time Jean Dubuffet – one of the most imaginative minds of the twentieth century – was tired of established art and went in search of a new concept of art: free, unbiased, anti-intellectual, and raw – it should be “brut”. And Dubuffet would indeed find it in unexpected places: on the street, in prisons, in folkart, and in psych- iatric clinics in Europe and abroad.
    [Show full text]
  • The Metamorphosis in Jean Dubuffet's Artworks
    International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change. www.ijicc.net Volume 13, Issue 3, 2020 The Metamorphosis in Jean Dubuffet's Artworks Mohsen Reda Al-kizwinia*, Hassanein Abdulameer Rashedb, Bahaa A. Al- Saadic, a,b,cCollege of Fine Arts, University of Babylon-Iraq, Email: a*[email protected] This study presents the metamorphosis in the works of art by Jean Dubuffet, as a concept focussed on structuralism in its propositions. The study was interested in theorists of postmodernism art because of its strategic importance in the design process, in the aesthetics of modern art. The concept is discussed in different branches of knowledge, such as linguistics, philosophy, and art. Therefore, the syntactic structures stated that each cognitive system is made up of infrastructures called deep structures. The deep structure establishes the main bases of transformation that is referred to as generative grammar by Noam Chomsky. Meanwhile, in the branch of philosophy, Kevin Vanhoozer distinguished pre- and post-modernism by referring to what each of them considered, ‘the first philosophy’. The first pre-modernism philosophy was metaphysical, but everything in modernism turned towards epistemology. Then, in post-modernism, philosophy turned into a breakup and dismantling of epistemology. Jean Dubuffet's artworks have presented the formal transformations of elements and relationships at the aesthetic level. He created numerous artworks in different methods and using different technical experiences in drawing. He also knew how to use his tools and yield his tools to be obedient with his ideas, taking advantage of casual, emergency, and fondness of children's arts, and the insane arts.
    [Show full text]
  • Paris Avant-Garde
    PRESS RELEASE | LONDON FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE | 9 OCTOBER 2020 PARIS AVANT-GARDE NOW AVAILABLE TO BROWSE ONLINE CHRISTIE’S 20th CENTURY: LONDON TO PARIS SERIES 22 OCTOBER 2020 AUCTION HIGHLIGHTS PIERRE SOULAGES, PEINTURE Pierre Soulages will be the highlight of the Paris Avant- Garde sale with a real masterpiece executed in 1961 and coming from the personal collection of Donald & Jean Stralem, two major American collectors who acquired the painting the same year of its execution. This important large-scale painting has never been seen on the market since its purchase in 1961. It is a great chance for international collectors to discover this masterpiece by the artist. The early 1960’s were decisive for Pierre Soulages. First, because he and his wife moved to Sète where his work evolved dramatically and second because Soulages gained in notoriety thanks to two major exhibitions organized in 1960. Peinture 162 x 130 cm, 9 juillet 1961, estimated at €6,000,000-8,000,000 is a real rediscovery for the art market. ZAO WOU-KI, 31.07.68 Christie’s will also present 31.07.68 by Zao Wou-Ki. This painting was realised by the artist a few years before his wife’s passing which brought him a lot of suffering. The artist materialized his torment on the canvas as seen here and it depicts the chaos inside of him. The genius of the painter, however, lies in his ability to transcend this intimate dimension. Zao Wou-Ki's revolution, which fuses the spontaneity of Western painting with the mastery of Chinese calligraphy, explores the expressive possibilities offered by abstraction and opens up a new world of representation.
    [Show full text]
  • Jean Dubuffet Brutal Beauty
    JEAN DUBUFFET BRUTAL BEAUTY LARGE PRINT GUIDE INTRODUCTION ‘Art should always make you laugh a little and fear a little. Anything but bore’ Jean Dubuffet (1901–1985) was one of the most provocative artists in postwar France. He rebelled against conventional ideas of beauty, hoping to capture the poetry of everyday life in a gritty, authentic way. Working like an alchemist in his studio, he experimented endlessly with materials: from coal dust, gravel and tar to butterfly wings and silver foil. As the critic Michel Tapié put it, he turned painting into ‘a sort of living matter working its perpetual magic’. Born in Le Havre, Dubuffet moved to Paris when he was 17 to study at the prestigious Académie Julian. He left after six months, realizing that he would do better to create his own syllabus of favourite subjects, which included philosophy, literature and ethnography. He went to work for his father’s wine business and then established his own. It was only at the age of 41, in the midst of the German occupation of Paris, that he decided to devote himself wholeheartedly to being an artist. From the outset, Dubuffet was drawn to other untrained artists: work by graffitists, tattooists, spiritualists, the incarcerated, children and individuals in psychiatric care felt much more alive to him than anything on display in museums. He called this work ‘Art Brut’ (literally meaning ‘raw art’) and from 1945 dedicated himself to its research and recognition. Brutal Beauty, which is the first major exhibition of Dubuffet’s work to take place in the UK since 1966, celebrates his career in dialogue with work by some of those who radically affected his thinking about what art could be.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Gestural Abstraction
    1 GEstural ABsTraction Peter Selz and Kristine Stiles The dominant art mode during and after World War II has been labeled as Abstract Expressionism, action painting, lyrical abstraction, tachisme, art informel, art autre, and a host of other terms. Characterized by an intensely personal and subjective response by artists to the medium and the working process, it was an art in which painters and sculptors were engaged in the search for their own identity. in a universe described by existentialists as absurd, the artist carried the romantic quest for the self, sincerity, and emotional authenticity into a world of uncertainty, placing great value on risk-taking, discovery, and adventure into the unknown. Painters and sculptors manifested an at- titude that the Cubist Juan Gris had described earlier: “you are lost the instant you know what the result will be.” in the aftermath of fascist domination in Europe and in the face of the increasing rigidity of authoritarian communism in stalinist Russia, artists everywhere felt the need to establish a sense of personal autonomy. Auschwitz and hiroshima were cataclysms of such monstrous proportions that they could elicit little direct commentary from visual artists. indeed, responding to the Romanian poet Paul Celan’s poem “Death Fugue” (1944–45), which recalled the nazi death camps, the German philosopher The- odor Adorno wrote, “After Auschwitz, to write a poem is barbaric.” Adorno’s comment suggested the impossibility of making art after the apparent collapse of liberal human- ism. The dilemma posed by the conformity encouraged by mechanized mass culture and the growth and plethora of media added to the artist’s sense of alienation and need for individual expression.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington, D. C. February 6 S 1968. the National Gallery of Art Will Open
    SIXTH STREET AT CONSTITUTION AVENUE NW WASHINGTON DC 20565 • 737-4215 extension 224 Washington, D. C. February 6 S 1968. The National Gallery of Art will open its 1968 season Sunday, February 18, with a distinguished international exhibitions, "Painting in France 1900-1967." Under the patronage of the Ambassador of France, His Excellency Charles Lucet, it will be shown in Washington, D. C., for one month before traveling during the year to New York City, Boston, Chicago, and San Francisco, under the auspices of the International Exhibitions Foundation. The exhibition of more than 150 French pictures is divided into two groups: paintings by the great founders of the modern movement, such as Picasso, Braque, and Matisse; and those, of succeeding generations, such as de StaSl, Balthus, Soulages, Hartung, le Pare, Klein, and Messagier. John Walker, Director of the National Gallery, characterizes the selection as the first comprehensive assessment on this scale in America of the 20th-century work of the School of Paris. "In terms of magnitude and quality," he said, "'Painting in France 1900-1967' will offer us the first opportunity to witness the major contributions of the School of Paris through the first two-thirds of the century " The critic Marcel Brion has pointed out that the School of Paris is no "school" in the usual ser.se A painter of any nation­ ality can belong to it, he explains 9 provided he has lived in Paris, or at least in France The concept of "Painting in France 19QO°1967" began to form in the early 1960's when it became evident to some critics that the dominant School of New York was obscuring the School of Paris, Through the cooperation of the Musee National d'Art Moderne in Paris, unprecedented loans from French public and private col­ lections were arranged; for example 9 Dubuffet's important Vinous Landscape is from the home of Andre Malraux 3 French Minister of State for Cultural Affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Jean Dubuffet & Art Brut
    Platform, Vol. 11, ‘Authenticity’, Autumn 2017 Jean Dubuffet & Art Brut: The Creation of an Avant-Garde Identity By Antonia Dapena-Tretter Abstract Since Jean Dubuffet first invented the category Art Brut, or Outsider Art, has stood as a unique niche characterized by supposedly pure or authentic artworks born outside the clutches of cultural influence. Despite staking claim to the Art Brut label himself, Dubuffet maintained a profitable career within the fine art market he criticized, utilizing his unusual collection as a tool through which to fashion an image of individuality. As the avant-garde artist par excellence, Dubuffet’s early career reveals a personal quest for an undetected ‘other’—resolved through his 1945 ‘discovery’ of Art Brut. In writing Asphyxiating Culture and other public texts that denounce societal impact on artistic production, Dubuffet carefully constructed the appearance of an outsider. While reaping the financial benefits of an avant-garde status, Dubuffet simultaneously shamed other artists within his Art Brut collection for pursuing artistic recognition or fame. This article provides a careful reading of Dubuffet’s many texts and artist statements, underscoring the paradoxical nature of his celebrated career and ultimately questioning the very idea of artistic authenticity. Struck by the freedom of expression found in the recently- discovered art of the mentally-ill, the French post-war artist Jean Dubuffet began a quest for what he called art of ‘raw’ origins—an indirect reference to Levi Strauss’s famous volume The Raw and the Cooked. His search was resolved in 1945 when the artist claimed to have discovered a new category of art.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Children's Art on Joan Miró and Jean Dubuffet
    Virginia Commonwealth University VCU Scholars Compass Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 1983 THE INFLUENCE OF CHILDREN'S ART ON JOAN MIRÓ AND JEAN DUBUFFET Linda L. Ferrell Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd Part of the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons © The Author Downloaded from https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/4572 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at VCU Scholars Compass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of VCU Scholars Compass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE INFLUENCE OF CHILDREN 'S ART ON JOAN MIR6 AND JEAN DUBUFFET by Linda L. Ferrell B.A. , Mary Washington College of the University of Virginia Submitted to the Faculty of the Schoo l of the Arts of Virginia Commonwealth Un iversity in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts Richmond , Virginia December , 1983 Virginia Comm�nwealth University Library APPROVAL CERTIFICATE THE INFLUENCE OF CHILDREN 'S ART ON JOAN MI RO AND JEAN DUBUFFET by LINDA L. FERRELL Approved : Thesis Advisor De ade Graduate Committee 1airector of�adUate Studies Arts TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS . iii Chapter I. ART OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY AND CHILDREN 'S ART ...... 1 II. THE STAGES OF DEVELOPMENT IN CHILDREN 'S ART . 17 III. JOAN MIRO AND CHILDREN 'S ART . 32 IV. JEAN DUBUFFET AND CHILDREN 'S ART . 52 V. CONCLUSION . 73 NOTES 86 BIBLIOGRAPHY. 96 ILLUSTRATIONS 100 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Page 1. Gestalts which represent the probable 10 1 evolution of human fo rms from earlier scribbles .
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Expressionism's Missing Link
    Abstract Expressionism’s Missing Link http://hyperallergic.com/82464/abstract-expressionisms-missing-link/?u... Sensitive to Art & its Discontents by John Yau on September 8, 2013 1 of 8 9/11/2013 10:25 AM Abstract Expressionism’s Missing Link http://hyperallergic.com/82464/abstract-expressionisms-missing-link/?u... Alfonso Ossorio, “Couple and Progeny” (1951) (all images courtesy the Parrish Art Museum unless otherwise noted) 1. Angels, Demons, and Savages: Pollock, Ossorio, Dubuffet, which was organized by Klaus Ottmann and Dorothy Kosinki for The Phillips Collection, Washington DC. (February 9–May 23, 2013) and is currently at the Parrish Art Museum, Watermill, New York (July 21–October 27, 2013), is — for many reasons — both long overdue and a game changer. For one thing, it brings Alfonso Ossorio back into view. 2 of 8 9/11/2013 10:25 AM Abstract Expressionism’s Missing Link http://hyperallergic.com/82464/abstract-expressionisms-missing-link/?u... Jackson Pollock, “Drawing for Number 19″ (1951) (click to enlarge) The exhibition focuses on a five-year period, from 1948 to 1952, when these three very different artists enabled each other to change his work. I think the dates are slightly off; I would have begun at 1949, the year Ossorio changed his mind about Pollock’s paintings, which he thought were too messy, and bought “Number 5 (1948)” (1948), the first of several major Pollocks that Ossorio would obtain. (“Number 5” was later owned by David Geffen, who sold it in 2006 for $140 million). Also, in April of that year, Betty Parsons introduced Pollock and Lee Krasner to Ossorio.
    [Show full text]