Symbols of Russian America
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Sitka National Historical Park the Archeology of the Fort Unit: Volume I: Results of the 2005-2008 Inventory
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln U.S. National Park Service Publications and Papers National Park Service 2010 Sitka National Historical Park The Archeology Of The Fort Unit: Volume I: Results Of The 2005-2008 Inventory William J. Hunt Jr. National Park Service, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natlpark Hunt, William J. Jr., "Sitka National Historical Park The Archeology Of The Fort Unit: Volume I: Results Of The 2005-2008 Inventory" (2010). U.S. National Park Service Publications and Papers. 89. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natlpark/89 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the National Park Service at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in U.S. National Park Service Publications and Papers by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. SITKA NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK THE ARCHEOLOGY OF THE FORT UNIT VOLUME I: RESULTS OF THE 2005-2008 INVENTORY by William J. Hunt, Jr. Midwest Archeological Center Occasional Studies No. 35 Volume 1 NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Midwest Archeological Center United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Midwest Archeological Center Lincoln, Nebraska 2010 This report has been reviewed against the criteria contained in 43CFR Part 7, Subpart A, Section 7.18 (a) (1) and, upon recommendation of the Midwest Regional Office and the Midwest Archeological Center, has been classified as Available Making the report available meets the criteria of 43CFR Part 7, Subpart A, Section 7.18 (a) (1). ABSTRACT In 2005, SITK invited the National Park Service’s (NPS) Midwest Archeological Center (MWAC) to conduct a Systemwide Archeological Inventory Program (SAIP) parkwide inventory at the park’s Fort Site Unit. -
Sitka National Monument Alaska
SITKA NATIONAL MONUMENT ALASKA to give away or destroy large quantities of In that year he established the fortified ries, its flour and lumber mills, and its tan property. At feasts called potlatches, the post of St. Michael, about 6 miles north of neries were traded as far away as Spanish host would present to his guests valuable the present Sitka. In 1802 the Sitkas sur California and the Hawaiian Islands. articles such as blankets, canoes, sheets of prised the settlement and wiped out most of Baranof soon transferred the company's SITKA copper, and even slaves. Guests who could the Russian and Aleut inhabitants. The fort American headquarters to Sitka, which re not return gifts of equal value lost prestige. was completely destroyed. Its site is still mained the capital of Russian America until known as "Old Sitka." Alaska was purchased by the United States in NATIONAL MONUMENT 1867. It was the capital of the new American White Traders Battle of Sitka territory until the administration was moved Baranof determined to reestablish his col to Juneau in 1906. Here are commemorated the bravery and In the last quarter of the 18th century, ony, but it took 2 years to marshal sufficient ships from Spain, Britain, Russia, and the resources at the company's headquarters on Features of the Monument the culture of Alaska's Indians. United States visited southeastern Alaska in Kodiak Island. In 1804 he appeared off the ever-increasing numbers. Most of them were site of the present Sitka with a force of about SITKA FORT SITE. -
The Eagle's Villa Pizza Restaurant and Carry
`Dinners The Eagle’s Villa Pizza Spaghetti Dinner-Spaghetti with Small Salad and Roll------------------$9.00 Spaghetti Ala. Carte --------------------------------------------------------------------$6.00 Restaurant and Carry Out Baked Spaghetti-Cheese covered and baked-------- Sm. $5.75 Lg. $8.20 Smothered Meatballs- (4) Cheese covered and baked ----------------$4.85 Serving New Albany since 1971 Meatballs $.90--Garlic Bread $1.85-- with Cheese $ 3.50 2 N. High St., New Albany, Ohio Fish Dinner- (2) pieces White Icelandic Cod, 855-7600 or 855-2231 French Fries & Slaw-------------------------------------------------------------------------$8.40 Open Sunday 4:00 PM to 10:00 PM Shrimp Dinner- (21) with French Fries and Slaw--------------------------$8.40 Mon. – Thurs. 10:30 AM to 10:00 PM Chicken Tenders- (4) with French Fries ---------------------------------------$8.40 Fri. & Sat. 10:30 AM to 11:00 PM Side Orders We fry with 100% peanut oil for taste and health Visit us at www.eagles-pizza.com French Fries -------------------------------------------------------------------------------$1.95 Join our fan page on Facebook Cheesy Bacon French Fries -------------------------------------------------------$4.50 Fried Cauliflower -------------------------------------------------------------------------$4.00 Pizza Menu Fried Mushrooms ------------------------------------------------------------------------$4.00 Regular Thin & Crispy *** Jalapeno Poppers ------------------------------------------------------------------------$4.25 Small 11 Inch -
A. F. Kashevarov, the Russian -American Company and Alaska
A. F. KASHEVAROV, THE RUSSIAN-AMERICAN COMPANY, AND ALASKA CONSERVATION Ryan Tucker Jones Idaho State University, 935 W. Clark St., Pocatello, ID 83204; [email protected] ABSTRACT As Russia debated selling Alaska in the 1860s, A. F. Kashevarov, an Alaska Creole, published his thoughts about reforming the Russian-American Company (RAC). In several articles for the Russian naval journal Morskoi Sbornik, he described the RAC’s hunting policies and conservation measures. Kashevarov’s articles represent some of the few sources providing information on Russian-era tradi- tional ecological knowledge (TEK), even if his depth of knowledge concerning Aleut (Unangan) and Alutiiq environmental practices and conceptions is uncertain. Despite company claims of conserva- tion successes, in Kashevarov’s view the RAC had misunderstood the Alaska environment and mis- managed its fur resources. Claiming that marine mammals behaved unpredictably and were entwined in a complex ecology, Kashevarov insisted that company attempts to create zapusks (closed seasons) did not work. Instead, he proposed that only Alaska Natives understood the animals well enough to manage them and thus should be ceded control over Alaska’s environment. Though these radical claims were met with company derision, Kashevarov’s pleas for ecological sophistication and ecologi- cal justice provide some glimpse into the desires of Alaska Natives shortly before the colony’s demise. INTRODUCTION In the 1860s, as the Russian empire debated selling Alaska see Dmytryshyn et al. 1989:518–524), shed valuable light to the United States, some new, unexpected voices arose to on Alaska’s environmental history, the RAC’s conserva- challenge Russian-American Company (RAC) adminis- tion policies, and the history of Alaska Natives and hint trators and imperial officials and put forth their own plans at alternate paths not taken but that still seemed possi- for the colony. -
Banners in Heraldic Art
Banners in heraldic art Magnus Backrnark Abstract The banner is very useful to heraldic art. It is a carrier of charges and colours, just like its coun terpart the shield. But where the shield can be seen as crude, heavy, flat and robust - its purpose being taking hits- the banner is brilliant, swift, full of I ife and motion. Its purpose is spiritual. It is lifted above anyone's head, above dust and confusion, for inspiration and guiding. Something of this character, I will with this article try to show by examples that the heraldic artist, if lucky, can translate in his or her work. First, we could though take a quick glance at the historical development of banners. The term banner approves, as we shall see, to a specific kind of flag, but in a wide sense of the word a banner is any ensign made of a peace of cloth, carried on a staff and with symbolic value to its owner(s). The profound nature of this innovation, which seem to be of oriental origin, makes it the mother of all kinds of flags. The etymologi cal root of the word banner is the French word banniere, derived from latin bandaria, bandum, which has German extraction, related to gothic bandwa, bandw6, 'sign'. 1 The birth of heraldry in the l2 h century Western world was preceded by centuries of use of early forms of banners, called gonfanons. From Bysantium to Normandy, everywhere in the Christian world, these ensigns usually were small rectangular lance flags with tai Is (Fig. -
Russian America and the USSR: Striking Parallels by Andrei V
Russian America and the USSR: Striking Parallels by Andrei V. Grinëv Translated by Richard L. Bland Abstract. The article is devoted to a comparative analysis of the socioeconomic systems that have formed in the Russian colonies in Alaska and in the USSR. The author shows how these systems evolved and names the main reason for their similarity: the nature of the predominant type of property. In both systems, supreme state property dominated and in this way they can be designated as politaristic. Politariasm (from the Greek πολιτεία—the power of the majority, that is, in a broad sense, the state, the political system) is formation founded on the state’s supreme ownership of the basic means of production and the work force. Economic relations of politarism generated the corresponding social structure, administrative management, ideological culture, and even similar psychological features in Russian America and the USSR. Key words: Russian America, USSR, Alaska, Russian-American Company, politarism, comparative historical research. The selected theme might seem at first glance paradoxical. And in fact, what is common between the few Russian colonies in Alaska, which existed from the end of the 18th century to 1867, and the huge USSR of the 20th century? Nevertheless, analysis of this topic demonstrates the indisputable similarity between the development of such, it would seem, different-scaled and diachronic socioeconomic systems. It might seem surprising that many phenomena of the economic and social sphere of Russian America subsequently had clear analogies in Soviet society. One can hardly speak of simple coincidences and accidents of history. Therefore, the selected topic is of undoubted scholarly interest. -
Native People in a Pacific World
Native People in a Pacific World: The Native Alaskan Encounter and Exchange with Native People of the Pacific Coast Gabe Chang-Deutsch 2,471 words Junior Research Paper The Unangan and Alutiiq peoples of Alaska worked in the fur trade in the early 1800s in Alaska, California and Hawaii. Their activities make us rethink the history of Native people and exploration, encounter and exchange. Most historical accounts focus on Native encounters with European people, but Native people also explored and met new Indigenous cultures. The early 1800s was a time of great global voyages and intermixing, from Captain Cook's Pacific voyages to the commercial fur trade in the eastern U.S to diverse workplaces in Atlantic world ports. The encounters and exchanges between and among Native people of the Pacific Coast are major part of this story. Relations between Native Alaskans, Native Californians and Hawaiians show how Native-to-Native encounters and exchanges were important in the creation of empire and the global economy. During the exploration of the Pacific coast in the early 1800s, Unangan and Alutiiq people created their own multicultural encounters and exchanges in the Pacific with Russian colonists, but most importantly with the indigenous people of Hawaii and California. By examining the religious and cultural exchanges with Russian fur traders in the Aleutian Islands, the creation of cosmopolitan domestic partnerships between different Native groups at Fort Ross and Native-to-Native artistic exchanges in Hawaii, we can see how Native-led events and ideas were integral to the growing importance of the Pacific and beginning an intercontinentally connected world. -
The Eagle Eye Winter 2015-2016
The Eagle Eye Winter 2015-2016 Bald Eagle Watching Days Set for January 15-16 Preparation for the 29th annual Bald presentations will be made. Frank at the River Arts Center Gallery form Eagle Watching Days (BEWD) is near- LaCour and his grandchildren will tell 8 a.m. to 3 p.m., staffed by representa- ly complete with a new birds of prey the story of Old Abe, the Wisconsin tives from the Bureau of Natural Her- show locked in for three shows on Jan Civil War Eagle. LaCour's family in the itage conservation and Ferry Bluff Ea- 15-16. Eau Claire area bought the young eagle gle Council. The Schlitz Audubon Nature Center from Chippewa Indians and then gave FBEC also will sell raffle tickets at of Milwaukee will bring its inter-active it to the local military unit preparing to the River Arts Center throughout the raptor show to the River Arts Center- go into the Civil War. Cathy Frasier, a day Saturday, with the drawing after for a show at 7 p.m. Friday, Jan. 15, Ferry Bluff Eagle Council member, 3:30 p.m. Prizes include a spotting plus two more shows on Saturday also will share some of her experiences scope and a pair of binoculars donated morning and again in the afternoon. as a chat room moderator for the Dec- as well as some framed pictures. Win- All shows are free and open to the orah eagle cam project. ners need to be present to pick up public. An eagle release by Marge Gibson their prizes at the River Arts Center on Joining the Audubon Nature Cen- of Raptor Education Group Inc. -
The Flag of the Russo-American Company
19005 Coast Highway One, Jenner, CA 95450 ■ 707.847.3437 ■ [email protected] ■ www.fortross.org Title: The Flag of the Russo-American Company Author(s): Dr. Svetlana G. Federova Published by: Academy of Sciences, U.S.S.R. iSource: Fort Ross Conservancy Library URL: www.fortross.org Fort Ross Conservancy (FRC) asks that you acknowledge FRC as the source of the content; if you use material from FRC online, we request that you link directly to the URL provided. If you use the content offline, we ask that you credit the source as follows: “Courtesy of Fort Ross Conservancy, www.fortross.org.” Fort Ross Conservancy, a 501(c)(3) and California State Park cooperating association, connects people to the history and beauty of Fort Ross and Salt Point State Parks. © Fort Ross Conservancy, 19005 Coast Highway One, Jenner, CA 95450, 707-847-3437 7 ,t:» ~ He,n·s: Thl' Central Pacific Hailroad. - Ground brokl' January Sth. 186.3. completed :\Ia~ · 8th. 186!J. Stanford: The PacifiC' H.ailroad ground hrokt•n - Jan~·· Sth 1863, an ~l complett'd l\la~· 8th 1869. (!'\ole omission of "Cmtral," ab breviation of "January.'' and addition of "and.'') SIDE NO. 4 - Hewt's: (in nine diagonall~·-rising lint's: "Directors'' onlv in quotes): "Directors" - Hon. Leland Stanford - Charles Crocker - ~lark Hopkins - E. H. l\liller. Jr. - C. P. Huntington - E. B. CrockPr - A. l'. Stanford - Charles :\Iarsh. Stanford: (in on I~· eight diagonall~ · -rising lint's): Directors of Photo courtesy of State H ermitagc Museum, Leningrad the - C.P.H..R. of Cal. -
A Pesticide Decision-Making Guide to Protect Pollinators in Landscape
A Pesticide Decision-Making Guide to Protect Pollinators in Landscape, Ornamental and Turf Management 2019 Edition By Maria van Dyke, Emma Mullen, Dan Wixted, and Scott McArt Pollinator Network at Cornell, 2018 Cornell University, Department Of Entomology Download this guide for free from: https://pollinator.cals.cornell.edu/resources/grower-resources/ Contents Choosing lower-risk pesticides for pollinators in landscape, ornamental & turf management ____ 1 How to use this guide 3 Understanding the terms in this guide 4 EPA Pesticide toxicity standards 4 Synergistic Interactions 4 Systemic Pesticides 4 Adjuvants and/or inert ingredients 5 Tying it all together: adopting an Integrated Pest and Pollinator Management (IPPM) approach 5 IPPM: Putting the “pollinator” in IPM: 6 Table 1: Product formulations and their active ingredients 7 Table 2: Pesticide synergies and acute, chronic, and sublethal toxicities for honey bees and other pollinators 10 Literature cited 25 Appendix A: Pollination contract ______________________________________________________ 29 Acknowledgments This research and development of this guide was supported by the New York State Environmental Protection Fund and New York Farm Viability Institute grant FOC 17-001. The expert advice and consultation provided by Dan Wixted of the Cornell Pesticide Management Education Program was supported by the Crop Protection and Pest Management Extension Implementation Program [grant no. 2017-70006-27142/project accession no. 1014000] from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture. 1 Choosing lower-risk pesticides for pollinators in landscape, ornamental & turf management Managing pests on ornamentals, in landscapes, and in nurseries while protecting pollinators can be a balancing act. Pollinators (mostly bees) are busy pollinating blossoms in nurseries and landscapes at the same time growers and landscapers need to be managing specific pests and diseases. -
Anooshi Lingit Aani Ka Russians in Tlingit America
B/87726 Anooshi Lingit Aani Ka .-V Russians in Tlingit America The Battles ofSitka, 1802 and 1804 Edited by Nora Marks Dauenhauer, Richard Dauenhauer, and Lydia T. Black UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON PRESS Seattle and London SEALASKA HERITAGE INSTITUTE Juneau Contents Preface • xiii K.T. Khlebnikov: Baranov's First Battle with the Tlingits, Acknowledgments • xxi Prince William Sound, June 1792 • 63 Russians in Tlingit America: New Perspectives on the Baranov Era, 1792-1818 • xxiii SECTION III The First Settlement in Tlingit Territory: SECTION I Yakutat, 1796 The Prelude: First Encounters of Dmitrii Tarkhanov: Russians and Tlingits Journal of 1796 • 67 Editors' Introduction to Section 1: The First Russian Landing in Tlingit Territory, 1741 • 3 SECTION IV Mark Jacobs Jr.: The Russian Push into Southeast Alaska before 1799 Early Encounters between the Tlingits and the Russians, Part One • 5 Filipp Kashevarov: Answers to Khlebnikov's Questionnaire about the Aleksei I. Chirikov: Years 1794-1800 • 91 Report to the Admiralty College, December 7,1741 • 7 Allan Engstrom: Yakobi Island, the Lost Village of Apolosovo, SECTION V and the Fate of the Chirikov Expedition • 11 The Founding of Old Sitka, 1799 Mark Jacobs Jr.: Editors' Introduction to Section v • 103 Early Encounters between the Tlingits and the Russians, John James, with Peter Nielsen and Ellen Hope Hays: Part Two • 21 Relating the History of the Sitka Kiks.adi Clan Houses A. P. Johnson (1979), Part One: and Migration • 107 First Encounter with the Russians, Dry Bay Area • 23 Tlingit Communities, 1802-1805 • 111 George T. Emmons: A. P. Johnson (1979), Part Two: Native Account of the Meeting between The Russians Move into Sitka • 115 La Perouse and the Tlingit • 27 Aleksandr Baranov: J. -
Revere's Bookplates
Revere’s Bookplates EVE RE’S engraving of bookplates is represented by eleven plates, four signed by him, four which were unquestionably his work, two which were probably his work, and one plate probably by his father, Apollos Rivoire. In general the plates are divided into two groups according to the style of the mantling. In the first group there are seven plates, three signed and four unsigned. They are almost identical, in the elaborate Chippendale style of mantling, scroll work, flowers, and motto ribbon. Revere used the same mantling many times, changing the coat-of- arms, the crest, and the name. It is probable that he used some English bookplate as his model, copying it faithfully, yet I have never located this English plate, although I have examined many thousands by English engravers. It is possible that he used his father’s Paul Rivoire plate for a model. The seven plates in the first group are as follows: Gardiner Chandler. Signed “P Revere scuip.” The coat-of-arms and the crest follow the design of the bookplate of his brother, John Chandler, Jr. (1721— i8oo), earlier engraved by Nathaniel Hurd; but the mantling is more elaborate and is distinctly Revere’s. Also the plate bears in the upper left corner the abbrevia tion “No,” with a superior “o” directly above two parallel lines, a characteristic of Revere’s bookplates and also of his colonial paper currency. Gardiner Chandler’s dates were 1723—1782 and the plate was probably engraved in the 1760’s. The original copper was long owned by Mrs.