DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Final Tcap 2011 Sgcn List - Statewide, Sorted by Ecoregions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Final Tcap 2011 Sgcn List - Statewide, Sorted by Ecoregions DRAFT FINAL TCAP 2011 SGCN LIST - STATEWIDE, SORTED BY ECOREGIONS Other Notes CHIH - GCPM Scientific Name Common Name Status Abundance Ranking HIPL SWTB TBPR ECPL WGCP CRTB CGPL EDPT GCPM Mid GCPM lower STPL for rationale supporting additions, deletions and other changes, Endemic in Texas AZNM Upper see ADD/DEL document Dec 2010 Federal State Global State Additional References re Life History to be Added June - July 2011 MAMMALS (see also Marine Mammals) Ammospermophilus interpres Texas antelope squirrel G4G5 S4 CHIH N Antilocapra americana Pronghorn G5 S3 CHIH HIPL SWTB CGPL N Antrozous pallidus Pallid bat G5 S5 CHIH HIPL SWTB CGPL EDPT STPL N Bison bison Bison G4 SH HIPL SWTB added N Blarina carolinensis Southern short-tailed shrew G5N5 S4 ECPL WGCP N Blarina hylophaga plumblea Elliot’s short-tailed shrew G5T1Q S1 TBPR ECPL GCPM-UP GCPM-MID N Chaetodipus eremicus Chihuahuan Desert pocket mouse G5 S5 CHIH N Chaetodipus nelsoni Nelson's pocket mouse G5 S? CHIH STPL N Conepatus leuconotus Hog-nosed skunk G5 S4 CHIH HIPL SWTB CRTB CGPL EDPT GCPM-LWR STPL N Corynorhinus rafinesquii Rafinesque's big-eared bat T G3G4 S3 WGCP GCPM-UP added to GCPM Upper N Corynorhinus townsendii Townsend's big-eared bat G4T4 S3? S4? CHIH HIPL SWTB CGPL EDPT change: removed subspecies N Cratogeomys castanops Yellow-faced pocket gopher G5 S5 HIPL SWTB CGPL deleted from CHIH N Cynomys ludovicianus Black-tailed prairie dog G5T3 S3 CHIH HIPL SWTB CGPL EDPT N Dipodomys compactus compactus Padre Island kangaroo rat G4T3 S3 GCPM-MID Y Dipodomys elator Texas kangaroo rat T G1G2 S2 SWTB CRTB CGPL status in review; may change by Plan print date Y Dipodomys ordii parvabullatus Ord's kangaroo rat G5 S4 GCPM-LWR STPL added new to GCPM - LWR and STPL Dipodomys spectabilis Banner-tailed kangaroo rat G5 S4 CHIH HIPL N Eptesicus fuscus Big brown bat G5 S5 CHIH EDPT added Euderma maculatum Spotted bat T G4 S2 CHIH N Eumops perotis californicus Greater western bonneted bat G5T4 S3 CHIH N Geomys attwateri Attwater's pocket gopher G4 S4 TBPR ECPL GCPM-UP GCPM-MID GCPM-LWR STPL Y Geomys aurenarius Desert pocket gopher G3 S2 CHIH N Geomys personatus davisi Texas (Davis') pocket gopher G4T2 S2 STPL N Geomys personatus maritimus Maritime pocket gopher G4 S4 GCPM-MID N Geomys personatus personatus Barrier island Texas pocket gopher G4TNR SNR GCPM-UP GCPM-MID Y Geomys streckeri Strecker's pocket gopher G4T1 S1 STPL Y Geomys texensis bakeri Frio pocket gopher G2QT2 S2 EDPT STPL N Geomys texensis texensis Llano pocket gopher G3T2 S2 EDPT Y Herpailurus yaguarondi Jaguarundi LE E G4 S1 GCPM-LWR STPL N Lasiurus ega Southern yellow bat T G5 S1 GCPM-MID GCPM-LWR (STPL) N Lasiurus xanthinus Western yellow bat G5 S1 CHIH N Leopardus pardalis Ocelot LE E G4 S1 CHIH GCPM-LWR STPL Listed Species with Recovery Plan, use in setting priority actions N Leptonycteris nivalis Mexican/Greater longnosed bat LE E G3 S1 CHIH Listed Species with Recovery Plan, use in setting priority actions N Lutra canadensis River otter G5 S4 TBPR ECPL WGCP CRTB CGPL EDPT GCPM-UP GCPM-MID Appendix II, CITES N Mephitis macroura Hooded skunk G5 S4 CHIH N Microtus mogollonensis Mogollon vole G4G5Q SNR CHIH N Microtus ochrogaster Prairie vole G5 S1 HIPL SWTB N Mormoops megalophylla Ghost-faced bat G4 S2 CHIH EDPT STPL N Mustela frenata Long-tailed weasel G5 S5 CHIH HIPL SWTB TBPR ECPL WGCP CRTB CGPL EDPT GCPM-UP GCPM-MID GCPM-LWR STPL Statewide N Mustela nigripes Black-footed ferret LE G1 SH CHIH HIPL SWTB CGPL EDPT Deleted in CRTB ecoregion. Not listed endangered for TX; however if experimental N Neovison vison Mink G5 S4 CRTB CGPL GCPM-UP GCPM-MID GCPM-LWR STPL added Myotis austroriparius Southeastern myotis G3G4 S3 TBPR ECPL WGCP GCPM-UP added to GCPM-UP N Myotis californicus California myotis G5 S4 CHIH added N Myotis ciliolabrum Western small-footed myotis G5 S3 CHIH added N Myotis velifer Cave myotis G5 S4 CHIH HIPL SWTB TBPR ECPL CRTB CGPL EDPT STPL N Myotis volans Long-legged myotis G5 S4 CHIH added N Myotis yumanensis Yuma myotis G5 S4 CHIH deleted in EDPT N Mytois thysanodes Fringed myotis G5 S3 CHIH N Nasua narica White-nosed coati T G5 S2? CHIH EDPT GCPM-LWR STPL N Notisorex crawfordii Desert shrew G5 S4 CHIH HIPL STPL deleted from SWTB N Nyctinomops femorosaccus Pocketed free-tailed bat G4 S3 CHIH N Nyctinomops macrotis Big free-tailed bat G5 S3 CHIH HIPL SWTB CGPL GCPM-LWR STPL added to CHIH N Onychomys arenicola Mearn's grasshopper mouse G4G5 S4S5 CHIH N Oryzomys couesi aquaticus Coues rice rat T G5T3? S2 GCPM-LWR (STPL) N Panthera onca Jaguar LE E G3 SH CHIH added to CHIH N Parastrellus hesperus Canyon Bat (western pipistrelle) G5 S5 CHIH EDPT added for EDPT Perimyotis subflavus Tricolored Bat (eastern pipistrelle) G5 S5 CHIH EDPT added for EDPT Peromyscus nasutus Northern rock mouse G5 S4 CHIH N Peromyscus truei comanche Palo Duro mouse T G5T3Q S2 SWTB N Puma concolor Mountain lion G5 S2 CHIH HIPL SWTB TBPR ECPL WGCP CRTB CGPL EDPT GCPM-UP GCPM-MID (GCPM-LWR) STPL Statewide N Scalopus aquaticus Eastern mole G5 S5 GCPM-UP GCPM-MID (GCPM-LWR) (STPL) added Scalopus aquaticus texanus Presidio mole G5T1Q S1 CHIH N Sigmodon fulviventer dalquesti Tawny-bellied cotton rat G5 S1 CHIH N Spilogale gracilis Western spotted skunk G5 S5 CHIH HIPL SWTB CGPL EDPT STPL N Spilogale putorius Eastern spotted skunk G4T S4 HIPL SWTB TBPR ECPL WGCP CRTB CGPL EDPT GCPM-UP GCPM-MID GCPM-LWR STPL N Sylvilagus aquaticus Swamp rabbit G5 S5 TBPR ECPL WGCP CRTB EDPT GCPM-UP GCPM-MID N Sylvilagus robustus Davis Mountain cottontail G5TU S3 CHIH N Tadarida brasiliensis Brazilian free-tailed bat G5 S5 CHIH HIPL SWTB TBPR ECPL WGCP CRTB CGPL EDPT GCPM-UP GCPM-MID (GCPM-LWR) STPL Statewide N Tamias canipes Gray-footed chipmunk G3 S2S3 CHIH N Taxidea taxus American badger G5 S5 CHIH HIPL SWTB TBPR ECPL CRTB CGPL EDPT GCPM-UP GCPM-MID GCPM-LWR STPL N Thomomys bottae guadalupensis Southern pocket gopher G5T2 S2 CHIH N compiled Dec 2010 - May 2011; printed 5/19/2011 4:33 PM Page 1 of 19 DRAFT FINAL TCAP 2011 SGCN LIST - STATEWIDE, SORTED BY ECOREGIONS Other Notes CHIH - GCPM Scientific Name Common Name Status Abundance Ranking HIPL SWTB TBPR ECPL WGCP CRTB CGPL EDPT GCPM Mid GCPM lower STPL for rationale supporting additions, deletions and other changes, Endemic in Texas AZNM Upper see ADD/DEL document Dec 2010 Federal State Global State Additional References re Life History to be Added June - July 2011 Thomomys bottae limpia Limpia southern pocket gopher G5T2 S2 CHIH same as Thomomys bottae texensis? N Thomomys bottae texensis Limpia Creek pocket gopher G5T2 S2 CHIH same as Thomomys bottae limpia? N Ursus americanus Black bear SAT T G5 S3 CHIH TBPR ECPL EDPT added to TBPR, ECPL; see also Louisiana black bear; may overlap with Louisiana b N Ursus americanus luteolus Louisiana black bear LT T G5T3 SNA WGCP GCPM-UP see also Black Bear N Vulpes velox Swift fox G3 S3? CHIH HIPL SWTB CGPL EDPT common nomenclature change (2009) N BIRDS ONLY: instead of endemism these BIRDS numbers are for taxonomic sorting Anas fulvigula Mottled Duck G4 S4B GCPM-UP GCPM-MID GCPM-LWR STPL Year-round 1 Anas acuta Northern Pintail G5 S3B,S5N HIPL SWTB TBPR ECPL WGCP CRTB CGPL GCPM-UP GCPM-MID GCPM-LWR STPL Winter 2 Callipepla squamata Scaled Quail G5 S4B CHIH HIPL SWTB CGPL GCPM-LWR STPL Year-round 3 Colinus virginianus Northern Bobwhite G5 S4B CHIH HIPL SWTB TBPR ECPL WGCP CRTB CGPL EDPT GCPM-UP GCPM-MID GCPM-LWR STPL deleted for CHIH 4 Cyrtonyx montezumae Montezuma Quail G4G5 S3B CHIH EDPT Year-round 5 Tympanuchus cupido Greater Prairie-Chicken (Interior) G4 S1B TBPR CRTB Year-round 6 Tympanuchus cupido attwateri Greater Prairie-Chicken (Attwater's) LE E G4T1 S1B GCPM-MID Year-round 6 Tympanuchus pallidicinctus Lesser Prairie-Chicken C2 G3 S2B HIPL SWTB CGPL Year-round 7 Meleagris gallopavo Wild Turkey G5 S5B CHIH SWTB TBPR ECPL WGCP CRTB CGPL EDPT GCPM-UP GCPM-MID GCPM-LWR STPL Year-round, added merriami for CHIH 8 Pelecanus erythrorhynchos American White Pelican G4 S2B,S3N GCPM-MID GCPM-LWR Breeding 9 Pelecanus occidentalis Brown Pelican E G4 S3B GCPM-UP GCPM-MID GCPM-LWR Year-round 10 Ixobrychus exilis Least Bittern G5 S4B TBPR ECPL WGCP GCPM-UP GCPM-MID GCPM-LWR Breeding 11 Egretta thula Snowy Egret G5 S5B TBPR ECPL WGCP CRTB GCPM-UP GCPM-MID GCPM-LWR Breeding 12 Egretta caerulea Little Blue Heron G5 S5B TBPR ECPL WGCP CRTB GCPM-UP GCPM-MID GCPM-LWR Breeding 13 Egretta tricolor Tricolored Heron G5 S5B WGCP GCPM-UP GCPM-MID GCPM-LWR Breeding 14 Egretta rufescens Reddish Egret T G4 S3B GCPM-UP GCPM-MID GCPM-LWR Year-round 15 Butorides virescens Green Heron G5 S5B TBPR ECPL WGCP CRTB GCPM-UP GCPM-MID GCPM-LWR Breeding 16 Plegadis chihi White-faced Ibis T G5 S4B WGCP GCPM-UP GCPM-MID GCPM-LWR Breeding 17 Mycteria americana Wood Stork T G4 SHB,S2N TBPR ECPL WGCP GCPM-UP GCPM-MID GCPM-LWR Migrant 18 Elanoides forficatus Swallow-tailed Kite T G5 S2B WGCP GCPM-UP Breeding 19 Ictinia mississippiensis Mississippi Kite G5 S4B HIPL SWTB TBPR (ECPL) WGCP CRTB CGPL GCPM-UP GCPM-MID GCPM-LWR Breeding 20 Chondrohierax uncinatus Hook-billed Kite G4 S2 GCPM-LWR STPL Year-round, Hidalgo Co.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bexar County Karst Invertebrates Draft Recovery Plan
    Bexar County Karst Invertebrates Draft Recovery Plan March 2008 Bexar County Karst Invertebrates Draft Recovery Plan BEXAR COUNTY KARST INVERTEBRATES DRAFT RECOVERY PLAN Southwest Region U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Albuquerque, New Mexico March 2008 Approved: ___DRAFT_______________________________________ Regional Director, Southwest Region Date U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Concur: __DRAFT____________________________________________ Executive Director Date Texas Parks and Wildlife Department ii Bexar County Karst Invertebrates Draft Recovery Plan DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that the best available science indicates are necessary to recover or protect listed species. Plans are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), but are sometimes prepared with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, state agencies, and others. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans are guidance and planning documents only. Identification of an action to be implemented by any private or public party does not create a legal obligation beyond existing legal requirements. Nothing in this plan should be construed as a commitment or requirement that any Federal agency obligate or pay funds in contravention of the Anti-Deficiency Act (U.S.C. 1341) or any other law or regulation. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views or the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the Service. They represent the official position of the Service only after the plan has been signed by the Regional Director as approved.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesser Mealworm, Litter Beetle, Alphitobius Diaperinus (Panzer) (Insecta: Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae)1 James C
    EENY-367 Lesser Mealworm, Litter Beetle, Alphitobius diaperinus (Panzer) (Insecta: Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae)1 James C. Dunford and Phillip E. Kaufman2 Introduction encountered in stored products (Green 1980). The other known species in the United States, A. laevigatus (Fabricius) The lesser mealworm, Alphitobius diaperinus (Panzer), is or black fungus beetle, is less commonly encountered and a cosmopolitan general stored products pest of particular may also vector pathogens and parasites and occasionally importance as a vector and competent reservoir of several cause damage to poultry housing. poultry pathogens and parasites. It can also cause damage to poultry housing and is suspected to be a health risk to humans in close contact with larvae and adults. Adults can become a nuisance when they move en masse toward artificial lights generated by residences near fields where beetle-infested manure has been spread (Axtell 1999). Alphitobius diaperinus inhabits poultry droppings and litter and is considered a significant pest in the poultry industry. Numerous studies have been conducted on lesser meal- worm biology, physiology, and management. Lambkin (2001) conducted a thorough review of relevant scientific literature in reference to A. diaperinus and provides a good understanding of the biology, ecology and bionomics of the pest. Bruvo et al. (1995) conducted molecular work to determine satellite DNA variants on the chromosomes of A. diaperinus. Alphitobius diaperinus is a member of the tenebrionid tribe Alphitobiini (Doyen 1989), which comprises four genera worldwide (Aalbu et al. 2002). Two genera occur Figure 1. Adult male lesser mealworm, Alphitobius diaperinus (Panzer). in the United States, of which there are two species in the This specimen taken from Henderson County, North Carolina.
    [Show full text]
  • FALL 2007 Center for Biological Diversity FALL 2007 1 Advocacy Spotlight Michael J
    Endangered INSIDE THIS ISSUE earth l Long Way Home The jaguar—despite a wild Unsafe Harbor population just 130 miles south of Arizona’s border with Court blocks Shell Oil plan to drill in Mexico—faces a much longer road back to the U.S. ...page 2 Beaufort Sea offshore of Arctic Refuge he Beaufort Sea off the north temporary reprieve Aug. 15, when l Program News coast of Alaska is a seasonally the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Penguins march toward Tfrozen home to threatened and issued an injunction blocking Shell’s protection, we say no to endangered animals such as bowhead dangerous designs. snagging sea turtles, beach whales, polar bears, and spectacled The rapidly shrinking sea ice in mice trump Gulf Coast resorts eiders. Unfortunately, it is also severely the Beaufort Sea threatens to drive again, and more. ...page 4 threatened by the intertwined forces polar bears to extinction by mid- of global warming and oil development— century or sooner. If the species is to most recently, by Shell Oil’s plans to have any hope of survival, we must not l D.C. Update: Inside the Beltway drill exploratory wells in waters only drastically reduce greenhouse gas Every dodo gets its day in just offshore of the Arctic National emissions to slow the warming of the an administration hostile to Wildlife Refuge. Arctic, but also protect the bear’s critical science and endangered But thanks to the efforts of the habitat from industrial developments. species. ...page 7 Center and our allies, the Beaufort Shell’s exploration plan—recently Sea and its imperiled denizens won a approved by the Bush administration— l In Remembrance Two longtime supporters leave lasting legacies to plants and wildlife.
    [Show full text]
  • Darkling Beetles and Mealworms Theresa A
    Darkling Beetles and Mealworms Theresa A. Dellinger and Eric R. Day, Department of Entomology, Virginia Tech Description Darkling beetles belong in the beetle family Tenebrionidae, which consists of more than 20,000 species of beetles. Adult darkling beetles widely range in shape and size, with most measuring from 2 – 19 mm (0.13” – 0.75”). Adults are usually a reddish-brown to brownish-black in color and can be shiny or dull. The elytra (the wing covers) can be smooth, grooved, or otherwise sculptured. Most do not have colorful patterns on their wing covers. Adults are most active at night and tend to avoid bright lights. Darkling beetle larvae are often referred to as mealworms or false wireworms. They are long, hard-bodied grubs with a cylindrical shape and are shiny yellow-brown to darKer brown in color. They are active crawlers. Yellow mealworm larva, top. Dark mealworm larva, bottom. Clemson University-USDA Cooperative Adult yellow mealworm, Tenebrio molitor. Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org. Clemson University-USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org. Life Cycle Darkling beetles have a complete life cycle with egg, larval, pupal, and adult stages. Most species of darkling beetles have a slow rate of development and may live for a year as an adult. Species living on grains or other stored products may develop faster. Habitat/Distribution Darkling beetles are found throughout the world except for places with very cold climates. They are scavengers and omnivores, feeding on decomposing plant material, dead insects, fungi, and stored products. Only a handful of darkling beetles are considered pests; the vast majority of them live in the wild and pose no harm.
    [Show full text]
  • Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
    1 Justin Augustine (CA Bar No. 235561) Jaclyn Lopez (CA Bar No. 258589) 2 Center for Biological Diversity 351 California Street, Suite 600 3 San Francisco, CA 94104 Tel: (415) 436-9682 4 Fax: (415) 436-9683 [email protected] 5 [email protected] 6 Collette L. Adkins Giese (MN Bar No. 035059X)* Center for Biological Diversity 8640 Coral Sea Street Northeast 7 Minneapolis, MN 55449-5600 Tel: (651) 955-3821 8 Fax: (415) 436-9683 [email protected] 9 Michael W. Graf (CA Bar No. 136172) 10 Law Offices 227 Behrens Street 11 El Cerrito, CA 94530 Tel: (510) 525-7222 12 Fax: (510) 525-1208 [email protected] 13 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Center for Biological Diversity and 14 Pesticide Action Network North America *Seeking admission pro hac vice 15 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 19 20 CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL ) 21 DIVERSITY, a non-profit organization; and ) Case No.__________________ PESTICIDE ACTION NETWORK ) 22 NORTH AMERICA, a non-profit ) organization; ) 23 ) Plaintiffs, ) COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY 24 ) AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF v. ) 25 ) ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ) 26 AGENCY; and LISA JACKSON, ) Administrator, U.S. EPA; ) 27 ) Defendants. ) 28 _____________________________________ ) Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief 1 1 INTRODUCTION 2 1. This action challenges the failure of Defendants Environmental Protection Agency and 3 Lisa Jackson, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator, (collectively “EPA”) to consult with the 4 United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“FWS”) and National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”) 5 (collectively “Service”) pursuant to Section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Control of the Alphitobius Diaperinus (Panzer) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) with Entomopathogenic Fungi
    Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola ISSN 1516-635X Apr - Jun 2009 / v.11 / n.2 / 121 - 127 Control of the Alphitobius Diaperinus (Panzer) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) with Entomopathogenic Fungi Author(s) ABSTRACT Rezende SRF1 Curvello FA2 The beetle Alphitobius diaperinus (Panzer), considered a worldwide Fraga ME3 Reis RCS2 pest in the poultry industry, is difficult to control and it is a vector for Castilho AMC4 pathogens. The objective of this study was to evaluate the biological Agostinho TSP5 control of the lesser mealworm, by strains of fungi Beauveria bassiana, 1 M.Sc. student in Animal Science of Cladosporium sp. and Trichoderma sp. Larvae and adults of the A. Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro. diaperinus were inoculated with suspensions of conidia in the 2 Professor, Instituto de Zootecnia of concentration of 107 conídia.mL-1. The B. bassiana isolate caused higher Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro. 3 Professor, Instituto de Veterinária of insect mortality as compared to Cladosporium sp. and Trichoderma sp. Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro; isolates, with the larvae being more susceptible than adults. The 4 Biologist MS. Agrobio - Alternative pesticides. entomopathogenicity of B. bassiana was further evaluated with 200 5 M.Sc student in Zootecnia of Universidade larvae and 200 adults of A. diaperinus inoculated with suspensions 106, Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro. 107, and 108 conidia.mL-1, and observed for ten days. Larvae mortality started at the fourth day at the lowest concentration, and the adult mortality was only observed on the sixth day at the concentration of 108 conidia.mL-1.
    [Show full text]
  • Laboratory Methods for Rearing Soil Beetles (Coleoptera)
    ZOOLOGICA Bolesław Burakowski Laboratory methods for rearing soil beetles (Coleoptera) Polska Akademia Nauk Muzeum i Instytut Zoologii Warszawa 1993 http://rcin.org.pl POLSKA AKADEMIA NAUK MUZEUM I INSTYTUT ZOOLOGII MEMORABILIA ZOOLOGICA 46 Bolesław Burakowski Laboratory methods for rearing soil beetles (Coleopter a) WARSZAWA 1993 http://rcin.org.pl MEMORABILIA ZOOLOGICA, 46, 1993 World-list abbreviation: Memorabilia Zool. EDITORIAL STAFF Editor — in — chief — Bohdan Pisarski Asistant editor — Wojciech Czechowski Secretary — Katarzyna Cholewicka-Wiśniewska Editor of the volume — Wojciech Czechowski Publisher Muzeum i Instytut Zoologii PAN ul. Wilcza 64, 00-679 Warszawa PL ISSN 0076-6372 ISBN 83-85192-12-3 © Copyright by Muzeum i Instytut Zoologii PAN Warszawa 1993 Nakład 1000 egz. Ark. wyd. 5,5. Ark. druk 4 Druk: Zakład Poligraficzno-Wydawniczy „StangraF’ http://rcin.org.pl Bolesław Bu r a k o w sk i Laboratory methods for rearing soil beetles ( Coleoptera) INTRODUCTION Beetles are the most numerous group of insects; nearly 300,000 species have been described up till now, and about 6,000 of these occur in Poland. The morphological variability and different modes of life result from beetle ability to adapt to all kinds of habitats. Terrestrial and soil living forms dominate. Beetles undergo a complete metamorphosis and most species live in soil during at least one of the stages. They include predators, herbivores, parasites and sapro- phagans, playing a fairly significant role in nature and in man’s economy. Our knowledge of beetles, even of the common species, is insufficient. In spite of the fact that the beetle fauna of Central Europe has been studied relatively well, the knowledge accumulated is generally limited to the adults, while the immature stages have not been adequately studied.
    [Show full text]
  • Beetles in a Suburban Environment: a New Zealand Case Study. The
    tl n brbn nvrnnt: lnd td tl n brbn nvrnnt: lnd td h Idntt nd tt f Clptr n th ntrl nd dfd hbtt f nfld Alnd (4-8 GKhl . : rh At SI lnt rttn Mnt Albrt rh Cntr rvt Alnd lnd • SI lnt rttn prt • EW EAA EAME O SCIEIIC A IUSIA ESEAC 199 O Ο Ν Ε W Ε Ν ttr Grnt rd Τ Ε Ρ Ο Ι Ο Τ ie wi e suo o a oey Sciece eseac Ga om e ew eaa oey Gas oa is suo is gaeuy ackowege Ρ EW EAA SI ' EAME O lnt SCIEIIC A rttn IUSIA Wāhn ESEAC Mn p Makig Sciece Wok o ew eaa KUSCE G eees i a suua eiome a ew eaa case suy e ieiy a saus o Coeoea i e aua a moiie aias o yie Aucka (197-199 / G Kusce — Aucka SI 199 (SI a oecio eo ISS 11-1 ; o3 IS -77-59- I ie II Seies UC 5957(93111 © Cow Coyig uise y SI a oecio M Ae eseac Cee iae ag Aucka ew eaa eceme 199 ie y Geea iig Seices eso ew eaa Etiam pristina in aua Asο i a aua seig summa securitas et futura sweet tranquility and nature ., OISIECE e oe-eeig emoyci eee ioycus uuus (ou o is aie ooca os kaikaea (acycaus acyioies om e yie eee suey aea Aucka ew eaa e wie gaues o e eee ae oe cuses a ass ees is eee as a eic saus o uike a o e uaaa (Seoo as ossi eiece sows a e weei gou was iig i uassic imes way ack i e ea o e iosaus a gymosems moe a 1 miio yeas ago OEWO As a small boy in the 1930s I used to collect butterflies on the South Downs in southern England.
    [Show full text]
  • Section IV – Guideline for the Texas Priority Species List
    Section IV – Guideline for the Texas Priority Species List Associated Tables The Texas Priority Species List……………..733 Introduction For many years the management and conservation of wildlife species has focused on the individual animal or population of interest. Many times, directing research and conservation plans toward individual species also benefits incidental species; sometimes entire ecosystems. Unfortunately, there are times when highly focused research and conservation of particular species can also harm peripheral species and their habitats. Management that is focused on entire habitats or communities would decrease the possibility of harming those incidental species or their habitats. A holistic management approach would potentially allow species within a community to take care of themselves (Savory 1988); however, the study of particular species of concern is still necessary due to the smaller scale at which individuals are studied. Until we understand all of the parts that make up the whole can we then focus more on the habitat management approach to conservation. Species Conservation In terms of species diversity, Texas is considered the second most diverse state in the Union. Texas has the highest number of bird and reptile taxon and is second in number of plants and mammals in the United States (NatureServe 2002). There have been over 600 species of bird that have been identified within the borders of Texas and 184 known species of mammal, including marine species that inhabit Texas’ coastal waters (Schmidly 2004). It is estimated that approximately 29,000 species of insect in Texas take up residence in every conceivable habitat, including rocky outcroppings, pitcher plant bogs, and on individual species of plants (Riley in publication).
    [Show full text]
  • Karst Invertebrates Taxonomy
    Endangered Karst Invertebrate Taxonomy of Central Texas U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Austin Ecological Services Field Office 10711 Burnet Rd. Suite #200 Austin, TX 78758 Original date: July 28, 2011 Revised on: April 4, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 ENDANGERED KARST INVERTEBRATE TAXONOMY ................................................. 1 2.1 Batrisodes texanus (Coffin Cave mold beetle) ......................................................................... 2 2.2 Batrisodes venyivi (Helotes mold beetle) .................................................................................. 3 2.3 Cicurina baronia (Robber Baron Cave meshweaver) ............................................................... 4 2.4 Cicurina madla (Madla Cave meshweaver) .............................................................................. 5 2.5 Cicurina venii (Braken Bat Cave meshweaver) ........................................................................ 6 2.6 Cicurina vespera (Government Canyon Bat Cave meshweaver) ............................................. 7 2.7 Neoleptoneta microps (Government Canyon Bat Cave spider) ................................................ 8 2.8 Neoleptoneta myopica (Tooth Cave spider) .............................................................................. 9 2.9 Rhadine exilis (no common name) .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Habitat Age and Plant Species on Predatory Mites (Acari, Mesostigmata) in Grassy Arable Fallows in Eastern Austria
    Soil Biology & Biochemistry 50 (2012) 96e107 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Soil Biology & Biochemistry journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/soilbio Effects of habitat age and plant species on predatory mites (Acari, Mesostigmata) in grassy arable fallows in Eastern Austria Janet Wissuwa*, Jörg-Alfred Salamon, Thomas Frank University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Department of Integrative Biology and Biodiversity Research, Institute of Zoology, Gregor Mendel Straße 33, A-1180 Vienna, Austria article info abstract Article history: Density, diversity and assemblage structure of Mesostigmata (cohorts Gamasina and Uropodina) were Received 16 September 2011 investigated in nine grassy arable fallows according to a factorial design with age class (2e3, 6e8, 12e15 Received in revised form years) and plant species (legume: Medicago sativa, herb: Taraxacum officinale, grass: Bromus sterilis)as 15 February 2012 factors. The response of Mesostigmata to habitat age and plant species was explored because this group Accepted 24 February 2012 belongs to the dominant acarine predators playing a crucial role in soil food webs and being important as Available online 27 March 2012 biological control agents. To our knowledge, this combination of factors has never been studied before for Mesostigmata. A further rarely applied aspect of the present study is the micro-scale approach inves- Keywords: Predatory mites tigating the Mesostigmata assemblage of the soil associated with single plants. Four plots were randomly fi Mesostigmata chosen at each fallow in May 2008. At each plot plant roots and the adjacent soil of ve randomly Arable fallows selected plant individuals per plant species were dug out with steel cylinders for heat extraction of soil Habitat age fauna and measurement of environmental parameters.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Nico M
    Nico M. Franz – Vitae, February 2020 1 Curriculum Vitae Nico M. Franz Address Campus School of Life Sciences PO Box 874501 Arizona State University Tempe, AZ 85287-4501, USA Collection Alameda Building – Natural History Collections 734 West Alameda Drive Tempe, AZ 85282-4108, USA Collection – AB 145: (480) 965-2036 Fax: (480) 727-2203 Virtual E-mail: [email protected] Twitter: @taxonbytes BioKIC: https://biokic.asu.edu/ Education 1993 – 1996 Prediploma in Biology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany Undergraduate Advisor: Klaus Kubitzki 1996 Diploma Studies in Systematic Botany and Ecology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany Graduate Advisor: Gerhard Gottsberger 1996 – 1999 M.Sc. in Biology, University of Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica Graduate Advisor: Paul E. Hanson 1999 Graduate Research Fellow, Behavioral Ecology, Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (STRI), Balboa, Panama Research Advisor: William T. Wcislo 1999 – 2005 Ph.D. in Systematic Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY Graduate Advisor: Quentin D. Wheeler 2003 – 2005 Postdoctoral Research Fellow, National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, University of California at Sta. Barbara, Sta. Barbara, CA Postdoctoral Mentor: Robert K. Peet Languages English, German, Spanish (fluent); French, Latin, Vietnamese (proficient) Nico M. Franz – Vitae, February 2020 2 Faculty Appointments 2006 – 2011 Assistant Professor (tenure-track appointment), Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez, Mayagüez, PR 2011 – present Adjunct Professor, Department
    [Show full text]