DOCSLIB.ORG

Parade of the Craniates in Time and Taxa O Vertebrate Classification

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Parade of the Craniates in Time and Taxa O Vertebrate Classification Lesson 3 ◊ Lesson Outline: ♦ Parade of the Craniates in Time and Taxa o Vertebrate Classification ♦ Vertebrate Phylogeny o Evolution of the Craniates o Evolution of the Vertebrates o Evolution of the Gnathostomes o Evolution of the Chondrichthyes o Evolution of the Osteichthyes ◊ Objectives: At the end of this lesson you should be able to: ♦ Describe the major groups of non-Tetrapod Vertebrates. ♦ Describe the major steps in the evolution of each group. ◊ References: ♦ Chapter 4: 45-57 ◊ Reading for Next Lesson: ♦ Chapter 4: 57-85 Vertebrate Phylogenetic Relationships Who's Who Amongst the Vertebrates? Vertebrate Classification: There are several ways of classifying vertebrates. Traditional taxonomy divides vertebrates into: Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Genus Species From the last lecture, we have a good idea of the relationship of the protochordates: Phylum Echinodermata Phylum Hemichordata Phylum Chordata Subphylum Urochordata Subphylum Cephalochordata Subphylum Craniata (Vertebrata) Our focus will be on the Vertebrata. (Note: Vertebrates are a Subphylum and, technically, vertebrates ≠ craniates) The vertebrates can also be grouped by shared distinctive features. These include: Agnathans versus Gnathostomes: Agnathans lack jaws while all other vertebrates possess jaws Fishes versus Tetrapods versus Quadrapeds: Amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals are collectively referred to as tetrapods (four footed). This group includes derived forms that no longer possess four feet such as the legless amphibians and reptiles, the birds and flippered mammals as well as the quadrapeds. Anamniotes versus Amniotes: Reptiles birds and mammals produce a thin sac around the embryo called an amnion which encases the embryo in a protective water compartment. Fish and amphibians do not. Vertebrata Craniata Chordata Agnatha Gnathostomes Uro Cephalo Myxinoidea Petromyzontidae chordata chordata (hagfish) (lampreys) With the evolution of improved sensory organs and an anterior end, came the first innovation : the evolution of a cranium (1). With this comes the evolution of eyes, ears, nose and other sensory organs and an enlarged neural tube associated with the sense organs that forms the brain. The cranium is a composite structure of bone or cartilage that supports the sensory organs and protects the brain. At this early stage, the evolution of the cranium is associated with the evolution of cartilage. The next major step in vertebrate evolution was the appearance of a muscular pharyngeal pump for feeding – a muscular pump to produce a food-bearing water current (2). Super Class Agnatha This group includes the hagfish (Myxinoidea) and the lampreys (Petromyzontida). Together they are known as the cyclostomes (round mouth). All living agnathans lack bone. The two groups are extremely different morphologically and physiologically. They are often considered as the most primitive vertebrates but really they are highly evolved and modified – adapted to very specialized lifestyles – and not at all similar in many ways to the general ancestral state. Hagfish possess a single nostril and a vestibular apparatus (balancing organ) with a single semicircular canal. Their body fluid is isosmotic with sea water which is similar to marine invertebrates and distinct from all vertebrates. They are bottom feeding scavengers found only in sea water. Their eyes are vestigial and they feed mainly on invertebrates and dead or weakened fish. While it is believed that the suction pump was initially used for suspension feeding and deposit feeding by sucking, the lamprey, although jawless, have diversified to exploit the expanded pharyngeal pump with a rasp like muscular tongue for attacking vertebrate prey. They too have a single nostril but it does not connect to the pharyngeal cavity. They breathe in and out through the pharyngeal slits leaving the mouth free to form a negative pressure and suck onto their prey. They reproduce in fresh water and migrate to sea as juveniles. They possess two semicircular canals. They are hyposmotic to sea water. Craniates versus Vertebrates The next major step was the evolution of – the vertebral column (vertebrates) (3) – a series of separate bones or cartilage blocks that are firmly joined as a backbone defining the body axis. The hagfish lack vertebrae but do have a cranium. Thus, in most modern systems of classification, all chordates from the Agnathans on are considered as craniates while only those from the Petromyzontida on are considered vertebrates. This is a relatively new and fine distinction. Teleostomi Agnatha Gnathostomata Chondrichthyes Osteichthyes Tetrapods Elasmo Holo Actinop Sarcop branchii cephali terygii terygii Super Class Gnathostomata The distinguishing feature of all Gnathostomes is the presence of jaws (4) - biting devices derived from the pharyngeal arches that evolved to support the gill slits. With this there is the simultaneous appearance of paired pectoral and pelvic fins along with supportive bony or cartilagenous girdles and specialized musculature. This gave these animals stability and control for maneuverability while swimming With this, fish were released from filter feeding, gain increased mobility, and a variety of potential life styles opened up. There is a transition from animals with gills for feeding and skin for respiration to fish with jaws for feeding and gills for respiration. Early Gnathostomes are believed to have fed on larger food items with a muscularized mouth that rapidly snatched prey from the water. Active predation becomes a common lifestyle in subsequent vertebrate radiation. The Gnathostomes give rise to two major lines: the Chondrichthyes (cartilagenous fish) and the Teleostomi (Osteichthyes (bony fish) and Tetrapods) The Chondrichthyes (cartilagenous fish) consist of two groups. All are cartilagenous which is not an ancestral trait but represents a secondary loss (i.e. bone evolved before the Chondrichthyes) (5). Thus, they have a vertebral column composed mostly of cartilage that largely replaces the notocord as the functional support for the body. Class Chondrichthyes Subclass Elasmobranchii Subclass Holocephali The elasmobranchs include the sharks and the rays while the holocephali includes the chimaeras or rat fish. Class Osteichthyes: These fishes have bony skeletons. Also, whereas cartilagenous fishes address problems of buoyancy with oily livers and hydrofoil fins, most bony fish possess an adjustable gas- filled swimbladder that provides neutral buoyancy and moveable fins. Subclass Actinopterygii Ray-Finned Fishes These fish have distinctive fins supported internally with slender endoskeletal rays with muscles to control fin movement located within the body wall Palaeonisciformes Acipenseriformes paddlefish, sturgeon Polypteriformes birchirs Neopterygii Lepisosteiformes gar Amiiformes bowfin Teleostei modern fishes [The true fishes represent perhaps the most successful of all vertebrate lines giving rise to a tremendous diversity of species that have existed in large numbers for a long time. The teleostei encompass close to 20,000 living species spread from pole to pole and ranging from alpine lakes to deep ocean trenches. They outnumber all other vertebrates combined!] The Teleostomi include the bony fishes (Osteichthyes) and all of the tetrapods. It seems probable that bone first appeared as dermal armour for protection. It was laid down in membrane fashion in plates within the skin. Thus, the earliest vertebrates were without well-developed vertebrae and relied upon a strengthened notochord to meet the mechanical demands of body support and locomotion. When vertebrae first appeared in latter fishes, the vertebral elements initially rode upon or surrounded a notochord that continued to serve as the major structural component of the animal’s body. In latter fishes and terrestrial vertebrates the role of the vertebral column grows while that of the notochord declines. In adults of most derived vertebrates, the embryonic notochord disappears and is replaced by the vertebral column. Subclass Sarcopterygii Lobe-Finned Fish These fish have fleshy fins (6) that rest at the ends of short projecting appendages with internal bony elements powered by muscles located outside the body wall along the projecting fin The tetrapod limb evolved from the sarcopterygian fin. It is believed that these fins initially evolved for pivoting or maneuvering in shallow water - or for working bottom habitats in deeper waters. Crossopeterygii coelocanth (deep living with a swim bladder that is filled with fat and used for buoyancy and not respiration) Dipnoi lung fish (Have paired lungs and breathe air when water becomes hypoxic or when burrowing during periods of seasonal drought.) .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PALEONTOLOGICAL TECHNICAL REPORT: 6Th AVENUE and WADSWORTH BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, CITY of LAKEWOOD, JEFFERSON COUNTY, COLORADO
    PALEONTOLOGICAL TECHNICAL REPORT: 6th AVENUE AND WADSWORTH BOULEVARD INTERCHANGE PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, CITY OF LAKEWOOD, JEFFERSON COUNTY, COLORADO Prepared for: TEC Inc. 1746 Cole Boulevard, Suite 265 Golden, CO 80401 Prepared by: Paul C. Murphey, Ph.D. and David Daitch M.S. Rocky Mountain Paleontology 4614 Lonespur Court Oceanside, CA 92056 303-514-1095; 760-758-4019 www.rockymountainpaleontology.com Prepared under State of Colorado Paleontological Permit 2007-33 January, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 SUMMARY............................................................................................................................. 3 2.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 DEFINITION AND SIGNIFICANCE OF PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES........... 4 3.0 METHODS .............................................................................................................................. 6 4.0. LAWS, ORDINANCES, REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS......................................... 7 4.1. Federal................................................................................................................................. 7 4.2. State..................................................................................................................................... 8 4.3. County................................................................................................................................. 8 4.4. City.....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Phylum Arthropod Silvia Rondon, and Mary Corp, OSU Extension Entomologist and Agronomist, Respectively Hermiston Research and Extension Center, Hermiston, Oregon
    Phylum Arthropod Silvia Rondon, and Mary Corp, OSU Extension Entomologist and Agronomist, respectively Hermiston Research and Extension Center, Hermiston, Oregon Member of the Phyllum Arthropoda can be found in the seas, in fresh water, on land, or even flying freely; a group with amazing differences of structure, and so abundant that all the other animals taken together are less than 1/6 as many as the arthropods. Well-known members of this group are the Kingdom lobsters, crayfish and crabs; scorpions, spiders, mites, ticks, Phylum Phylum Phylum Class the centipedes and millipedes; and last, but not least, the Order most abundant of all, the insects. Family Genus The Phylum Arthropods consist of the following Species classes: arachnids, chilopods, diplopods, crustaceans and hexapods (insects). All arthropods possess: • Exoskeleton. A hard protective covering around the outside of the body (divided by sutures into plates called sclerites). An insect's exoskeleton (integument) serves as a protective covering over the body, but also as a surface for muscle attachment, a water-tight barrier against desiccation, and a sensory interface with the environment. It is a multi-layered structure with four functional regions: epicuticle (top layer), procuticle, epidermis, and basement membrane. • Segmented body • Jointed limbs and jointed mouthparts that allow extensive specialization • Bilateral symmetry, whereby a central line can divide the body Insect molting or removing its into two identical halves, left and right exoesqueleton • Ventral nerve
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Checklist of Marine Fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the Proposed Extension of the Portuguese Continental Shelf
    European Journal of Taxonomy 73: 1-73 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2014.73 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2014 · Carneiro M. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A5F217D-8E7B-448A-9CAB-2CCC9CC6F857 Updated checklist of marine fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf Miguel CARNEIRO1,5, Rogélia MARTINS2,6, Monica LANDI*,3,7 & Filipe O. COSTA4,8 1,2 DIV-RP (Modelling and Management Fishery Resources Division), Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, Av. Brasilia 1449-006 Lisboa, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3,4 CBMA (Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology), Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] * corresponding author: [email protected] 5 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:90A98A50-327E-4648-9DCE-75709C7A2472 6 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:1EB6DE00-9E91-407C-B7C4-34F31F29FD88 7 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:6D3AC760-77F2-4CFA-B5C7-665CB07F4CEB 8 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:48E53CF3-71C8-403C-BECD-10B20B3C15B4 Abstract. The study of the Portuguese marine ichthyofauna has a long historical tradition, rooted back in the 18th Century. Here we present an annotated checklist of the marine fishes from Portuguese waters, including the area encompassed by the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf and the Economic Exclusive Zone (EEZ). The list is based on historical literature records and taxon occurrence data obtained from natural history collections, together with new revisions and occurrences.
    [Show full text]
  • Constraints on the Timescale of Animal Evolutionary History
    Palaeontologia Electronica palaeo-electronica.org Constraints on the timescale of animal evolutionary history Michael J. Benton, Philip C.J. Donoghue, Robert J. Asher, Matt Friedman, Thomas J. Near, and Jakob Vinther ABSTRACT Dating the tree of life is a core endeavor in evolutionary biology. Rates of evolution are fundamental to nearly every evolutionary model and process. Rates need dates. There is much debate on the most appropriate and reasonable ways in which to date the tree of life, and recent work has highlighted some confusions and complexities that can be avoided. Whether phylogenetic trees are dated after they have been estab- lished, or as part of the process of tree finding, practitioners need to know which cali- brations to use. We emphasize the importance of identifying crown (not stem) fossils, levels of confidence in their attribution to the crown, current chronostratigraphic preci- sion, the primacy of the host geological formation and asymmetric confidence intervals. Here we present calibrations for 88 key nodes across the phylogeny of animals, rang- ing from the root of Metazoa to the last common ancestor of Homo sapiens. Close attention to detail is constantly required: for example, the classic bird-mammal date (base of crown Amniota) has often been given as 310-315 Ma; the 2014 international time scale indicates a minimum age of 318 Ma. Michael J. Benton. School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, U.K. [email protected] Philip C.J. Donoghue. School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, U.K. [email protected] Robert J.
    [Show full text]
  • Vertebrates and Invertebrates
    Vertebrates and invertebrates The animal kingdom is divided into two groups: vertebrates and invertebrates. Vertebrates have been around for millions of years but have evolved and changed over time. The word vertebrate means “having a backbone." Many animals have backbones. You have a backbone. So does a cow, a whale, a fish, a frog, and a bird. Vertebrates are animals that have a backbone. Most animals have a backbone that is made of bones joined together to form a skeleton. Our skeleton gives us our shape and allows us to move. Mammals, fish, birds, reptiles, and amphibians have Vertebrae backbones so they are all vertebrates. Each bone that makes up the backbone Scientists classify vertebrates into five classes: is called a vertebra. These are the • Mammals building blacks that form the backbone, • Fish also known as the spinal cord. The • Birds vertebrae protect and support your • Reptiles spine. Without a backbone, you would not • Amphibians be able to move any part of your body. Animals without a backbone are called invertebrates. Most The human animals are invertebrates. In fact, 95% of all living creatures backbone has 26 on Earth are invertebrates. vertebrae. Arthropods are the largest group of invertebrates. Insects make up a large part of this group. All insects, such as ladybugs, ants, grasshoppers, and bumblebees have three body sections and six legs. Most arthropods live on land, but some of these fascinating creatures live in water. Lobsters, crabs, and shrimp are arthropods that live in the oceans. Many invertebrates have skeletons on the outside of their A frog only has bodies called exoskeletons.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Phylum Chordata
    Unifying Themes 1. Chordate evolution is a history of innovations that is built upon major invertebrate traits •bilateral symmetry •cephalization •segmentation •coelom or "gut" tube 2. Chordate evolution is marked by physical and behavioral specializations • For example the forelimb of mammals has a wide range of structural variation, specialized by natural selection 3. Evolutionary innovations and specializations led to adaptive radiations - the development of a variety of forms from a single ancestral group Characteristics of the Chordates 1. Notochord 2. dorsal hollow nerve cord 3. pharyngeal gill slits 4. postanal tail 5. endostyle Characteristics of the Chordates Notochord •stiff, flexible rod, provides internal support • Remains throughout the life of most invertebrate chordates • only in the embryos of vertebrate chordates Characteristics of the Chordates cont. Dorsal Hollow Nerve Cord (Spinal Cord) •fluid-filled tube of nerve tissue, runs the length of the animal, just dorsal to the notochord • Present in chordates throughout embryonic and adult life Characteristics of the Chordates cont. Pharyngeal gill slits • Pairs of opening through the pharynx • Invertebrate chordates use them to filter food •In fishes the gill sits develop into true gills • In reptiles, birds, and mammals the gill slits are vestiges (occurring only in the embryo) Characteristics of the Chordates cont. Endostyle • mucous secreting structure found in the pharynx floor (traps small food particles) Characteristics of the Chordates cont. Postanal Tail • works with muscles (myomeres) & notochord to provide motility & stability • Aids in propulsion in nonvertebrates & fish but vestigial in later lineages SubPhylum Urochordata Ex: tunicates or sea squirts • Sessile as adults, but motile during the larval stages • Possess all 5 chordate characteristics as larvae • Settle head first on hard substrates and undergo a dramatic metamorphosis • tail, notochord, muscle segments, and nerve cord disappear SubPhylum Urochordata cont.
    [Show full text]
  • Relationship Between Sagittal Otolith Size and Fish Size in Engraulis Encrasicolus and Sardina Pilchardus
    EISSN 2602-473X AQUATIC SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING Aquat Sci Eng 2018; 33(3): 72-76. • DOI: 10.26650/ASE201812 Original Article Relationship between Sagittal Otolith Size and Fish Size in Engraulis encrasicolus and Sardina pilchardus (Osteichthyes: Clupeiformes) in the Southern Aegean Sea, Turkey Gökçen Bilge Cite this article as: Bilge, G. (2018). Relationship between sagittal otolith size and fish size inEngraulis encrasicolus and Sardina pilchardus (Osteichthyes: Clupeiformes) in the southern Aegean Sea, Turkey. Aquatic Sciences and Engineering, 33(3): 72-76. ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to determine the regressions between otolith size (length and height), oto- lith weight vs. fish length, and weight of European anchovyEngraulis encrasicolus (Linnaeus, 1758) (n=360) and European pilchard Sardina pilchardus (Walbaum, 1792) (n=360), living off Güllük Bay, Turkey. Fish were caught using a purse seine between January and March 2014 in the southern Aegean Sea. No differences were found between the size and weight of the left and right otoliths. Equations were used to reconstruct the original dimensions of prey from the size of hard structures found in food samples of piscivorous preda- tors living in or in the vicinity of the aquatic habitat. A linear regression model was used to determine the relationship between fish length and otolith size, whereas an exponential regression model was used to describe the relationships between lengths and weights of otoliths and fish for both species. All regressions yielded high coefficients of determination (r2) of 0.78–0.93 for E. encrasicolus and 0.80–0.95 for S. pilchardus. We conclude that otolith length and otolith weight are good indicators of the length and weight of the two species.
    [Show full text]
  • Fins, Limbs, and Tails: Outgrowths and Axial Patterning in Vertebrate Evolution Michael I
    Review articles Fins, limbs, and tails: outgrowths and axial patterning in vertebrate evolution Michael I. Coates1* and Martin J. Cohn2 Summary Current phylogenies show that paired fins and limbs are unique to jawed verte- brates and their immediate ancestry. Such fins evolved first as a single pair extending from an anterior location, and later stabilized as two pairs at pectoral and pelvic levels. Fin number, identity, and position are therefore key issues in vertebrate developmental evolution. Localization of the AP levels at which develop- mental signals initiate outgrowth from the body wall may be determined by Hox gene expression patterns along the lateral plate mesoderm. This regionalization appears to be regulated independently of that in the paraxial mesoderm and axial skeleton. When combined with current hypotheses of Hox gene phylogenetic and functional diversity, these data suggest a new model of fin/limb developmental evolution. This coordinates body wall regions of outgrowth with primitive bound- aries established in the gut, as well as the fundamental nonequivalence of pectoral and pelvic structures. BioEssays 20:371–381, 1998. ௠ 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Introduction over and again to exemplify fundamental concepts in biological Vertebrate appendages include an amazing diversity of form, theory. The striking uniformity of teleost pectoral fin skeletons from the huge wing-like fins of manta rays or the stumpy limbs of illustrated Geoffroy Saint-Hilair’s discussion of ‘‘special analo- frogfishes, to ichthyosaur paddles, the extraordinary fingers of gies,’’1 while tetrapod limbs exemplified Owen’s2 related concept aye-ayes, and the fin-like wings of penguins. The functional of ‘‘homology’’; Darwin3 then employed precisely the same ex- diversity of these appendages is similarly vast and, in addition to ample as evidence of evolutionary descent from common ances- various modes of locomotion, fins and limbs are also used for try.
    [Show full text]
  • Vertebrates in the Animal Kingdom
    Science Enhanced Scope and Sequence – Grade 5 Vertebrates in the Animal Kingdom Strand Living Systems Topic Investigating characteristics of organisms Primary SOL 5.5 The student will investigate and understand that organisms are made of one or more cells and have distinguishing characteristics that play a vital role in the organism’s ability to survive and thrive in its environment. Key concepts include b) classification of organisms using physical characteristics, body structures, and behavior of the organism; c) traits of organisms that allow them to survive in their environment. Related SOL 5.1 The student will demonstrate an understanding of scientific reasoning, logic, and the nature of science by planning and conducting investigations in which a) items such as rocks, minerals, and organisms are identified using various classification keys. Background Information To study organisms, scientists first look at their characteristics and group the organisms based on the characteristics they share. Some animals are so small that they live on or inside other animals. Others, such as the giant squid, are many meters long and live in the depths of oceans. Animals can swim, crawl, burrow, fly, or not move at all. No matter what their size, where they live, or how they move, all animals must have some basic characteristics in common. All organisms in the animal kingdom (1)) are made of cells, (2 reproduce, (3) grow and develop, (4) have a life cycle, (5) obtain and use energy, and (6) responds and adapt to their environment. In the 18th century, a Swedish scientist named Carolus Linnaeus developed a system to organize living things.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary Crossroads in Developmental Biology: Cyclostomes (Lamprey and Hagfish) Sebastian M
    PRIMER SERIES PRIMER 2091 Development 139, 2091-2099 (2012) doi:10.1242/dev.074716 © 2012. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd Evolutionary crossroads in developmental biology: cyclostomes (lamprey and hagfish) Sebastian M. Shimeld1,* and Phillip C. J. Donoghue2 Summary and is appealing because it implies a gradual assembly of vertebrate Lampreys and hagfish, which together are known as the characters, and supports the hagfish and lampreys as experimental cyclostomes or ‘agnathans’, are the only surviving lineages of models for distinct craniate and vertebrate evolutionary grades (i.e. jawless fish. They diverged early in vertebrate evolution, perceived ‘stages’ in evolution). However, only comparative before the origin of the hinged jaws that are characteristic of morphology provides support for this phylogenetic hypothesis. The gnathostome (jawed) vertebrates and before the evolution of competing hypothesis, which unites lampreys and hagfish as sister paired appendages. However, they do share numerous taxa in the clade Cyclostomata, thus equally related to characteristics with jawed vertebrates. Studies of cyclostome gnathostomes, has enjoyed unequivocal support from phylogenetic development can thus help us to understand when, and how, analyses of protein-coding sequence data (e.g. Delarbre et al., 2002; key aspects of the vertebrate body evolved. Here, we Furlong and Holland, 2002; Kuraku et al., 1999). Support for summarise the development of cyclostomes, highlighting the cyclostome theory is now overwhelming, with the recognition of key species studied and experimental methods available. We novel families of non-coding microRNAs that are shared then discuss how studies of cyclostomes have provided exclusively by hagfish and lampreys (Heimberg et al., 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of the Mitochondrial Genomes of Calcareous Sponges and Cnidarians Ehsan Kayal Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Graduate Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2012 The evolution of the mitochondrial genomes of calcareous sponges and cnidarians Ehsan Kayal Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd Part of the Evolution Commons, and the Molecular Biology Commons Recommended Citation Kayal, Ehsan, "The ve olution of the mitochondrial genomes of calcareous sponges and cnidarians" (2012). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 12621. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/12621 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The evolution of the mitochondrial genomes of calcareous sponges and cnidarians by Ehsan Kayal A dissertation submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major: Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Program of Study Committee Dennis V. Lavrov, Major Professor Anne Bronikowski John Downing Eric Henderson Stephan Q. Schneider Jeanne M. Serb Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2012 Copyright 2012, Ehsan Kayal ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Vertebrate Animals Rules Rules Involving Vertebrate Animals
    Vertebrate Animals Rules Rules involving vertebrate animals The following rules were developed to help pre-college student b. Description of how the animals will be used. Include researchers adhere to the federal regulations governing methods and procedures, such as experimental design professional scientists and to protect the welfare of both and data analysis; description of the procedures that will animal subjects and the student researcher. Health and well- minimize the potential for discomfort, distress, pain and being is of high priority when students conduct research with injury to the animals during the course of experimentation; animal subjects. identifi cation of the species, strain, sex, age, weight, source and number of animals proposed for use. The Society strongly endorses the use of non-animal research methods and encourages students to use alternatives to animal 2. All vertebrate animal studies must be reviewed and approved research, which must be explored and discussed in the research before experimentation begins. An Institutional Animal Care plan. The guiding principles for the use of animals in research and Use Committee, known as an IACUC, is the institutional include the following “Four R’s”: animal oversight review and approval body for all animal • Replace vertebrate animals with invertebrates, lower life studies at a Regulated Research Institution. The local OR forms, tissue/cell cultures and/or computer simulations where affi liated fair SRC serves in this capacity for vertebrate animals possible. studies performed in a school, home or fi eld. Any SRC serving • Reduce the number of animals without compromising in this capacity must include a veterinarian or an animal care statistical validity.
    [Show full text]