DOCSLIB.ORG

A Survey of State-Level Cost and Benefit Estimates of Renewable Portfolio Standards J

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Survey of State-Level Cost and Benefit Estimates of Renewable Portfolio Standards J A Survey of State-Level Cost and Benefit Estimates of Renewable Portfolio Standards J. Heeter1, G. Barbose2, L. Bird1, S. Weaver2, F. Flores-Espino1, K. Kuskova-Burns1, and R. Wiser2 1 National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) 2 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, under contract DE-AC36-08GO28308. Berkeley Lab’s contributions to this report were funded by the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (Solar Energy Technologies Office and Strategic Programs Office) of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02- 05CH11231. This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. Technical Report NREL/TPNREL is a national-6A20- 61042laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. LBNL-6589E May 2014 A Survey of State-Level Cost and Benefit Estimates of Renewable Portfolio Standards J. Heeter1, G. Barbose2, L. Bird1, S. Weaver2, F. Flores-Espino1, K. Kuskova-Burns1, and 2 R. Wiser 1 National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) 2 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, under contract DE-AC36-08GO28308. This work was supported by the Director, Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy under Contract Number DE- AC02-05CH11231 Berkeley Lab’s contributions to this report were funded by the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (Solar Energy Technologies Office and Strategic Programs Office) of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231. This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. Technical Report NREL/TP-6A20-61042 LBNL-6589E May 2014 National Renewable Energy Laboratory Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 15013 Denver West Parkway 1 Cyclotron Road Golden, CO 80401 Berkeley, CA 94720 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov 510-486-4000 • www.lbl.gov NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof. This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. Available electronically at http://www.osti.gov/scitech Available for a processing fee to U.S. Department of Energy and its contractors, in paper, from: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-0062 phone: 865.576.8401 fax: 865.576.5728 email: mailto:[email protected] Available for sale to the public, in paper, from: U.S. Department of Commerce National Technical Information Service 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161 phone: 800.553.6847 fax: 703.605.6900 email: [email protected] online ordering: http://www.ntis.gov/help/ordermethods.aspx Printed on paper containing at least 50% wastepaper, including 10% post consumer waste. Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy’s (EERE) Strategic Programs Office for primary funding support for this analysis. In particular, the authors are grateful to Steve Capanna and Jason Walsh of the Strategic Programs Office for their support of this project. Participation by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) was co-funded by EERE’s Solar Energy Technologies Office, and was made possible through long-standing support by the National Electricity Delivery Division of the DOE’s Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability. The authors would also like to thank the following individuals for their thoughtful review: Michael Casper and Paul McCurley, National Rural Electric Cooperative Association; Trish Fields and Malcolm Woolf, Advanced Energy Economy; Ed Holt, Ed Holt and Associates; Andrew Kell, Wisconsin Public Utilities Commission; Dwight Lamberson, New Mexico Public Regulatory Commission; Will Lent and Rick Umoff, Solar Energy Industry Association; Warren Leon, Clean Energy States Alliance; Kevin Mosier, Maryland Public Service Commission; Elizabeth Salerno, American Wind Energy Association; Virinder Singh, EDF Renewable Energy; David Smithson, Texas Public Utilities Commission; as well as Jeff Logan, David Keyser, Thomas Jenkin, Gian Porro, Robin Newmark, Bobi Garrett, and Doug Arent of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Andrew Mills of LBNL and Kelly Knutsen, Ookie Ma, and Rich Tusing of DOE. We also wish to thank Kendra Palmer and Scott Gossett of NREL for editorial support. iii This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. Executive Summary More than half of U.S. states have renewable portfolio standards (RPS) in place and have collectively deployed approximately 46,000 MW of new renewable energy capacity through year-end 2012. Most of these policies have five or more years of implementation experience, enabling an assessment of their costs and benefits. Understanding RPS benefits and costs is essential for policymakers evaluating existing RPS policies, assessing the need for modifications, and considering new policies. This report surveys and summarizes existing state-level RPS cost and benefit estimates and examines the various methods used to calculate such estimates. The report relies largely upon data or results reported directly by electric utilities and state regulators. As such, the estimated costs and benefits itemized in this document do not result from the application of a standardized approach or the use of a consistent set of underlying assumptions. Because the reported values may differ from those derived through a more consistent analytical treatment, we do not provide an aggregate national estimate of RPS costs and benefits, nor do we attempt to quantify net RPS benefits at national or state levels. The report summarizes state-level RPS costs to date and considers how those costs may evolve going forward given scheduled increases in RPS targets and cost containment mechanisms incorporated into existing policies. The report also summarizes RPS benefits estimates, based on published studies for individual states, and discusses key methodological considerations. These estimates, for example, of the social value of carbon emissions reduction and the human health impacts of reduced air emissions, are based on a variety of methodologies and assumptions. In comparison to the summary of estimated RPS costs, the summary of RPS benefits is more limited, as relatively few states have undertaken detailed benefits estimates. Further, for those states that have estimated RPS benefits, most assess only a limited number of impact types; as a consequence, some types of benefits are not reflected in this report. RPS Costs Our analysis focuses specifically on the incremental cost of meeting RPS targets, i.e., the cost above and beyond what would have been incurred absent the RPS, over the 2010-2012 period. For states with restructured markets, we derive RPS compliance costs based on the cost of renewable energy certificates (RECs) and alternative compliance payments (ACPs). For traditionally regulated states, we instead rely upon RPS cost estimates reported directly by utilities or regulators within annual compliance reports or other regulatory filings (not prospective studies), and translate those estimates into a set of common metrics for comparison. The methods used by utilities and regulators to estimate incremental compliance costs vary considerably from state to state, in some cases reflecting statutory or regulatory requirements, and a number of states are currently engaged in processes to refine and standardize their approaches to RPS cost calculation. Importantly, the estimated RPS costs summarized within this report must be considered in light of what the underlying data represent and the limitations therein. First and foremost, the comparisons across states are imperfect, given the varying methods and assumptions used (especially among regulated states). Second, the data presented most closely correspond to the costs borne by utilities or other load serving entities; they do not represent net costs to society, iv This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. nor do they necessarily represent the costs ultimately borne by ratepayers, such as in cases where ACPs or financial penalties are not passed
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Energy Information Administration (EIA) 2014 and 2015 Q1 EIA-923 Monthly Time Series File
    SPREADSHEET PREPARED BY WINDACTION.ORG Based on U.S. Department of Energy - Energy Information Administration (EIA) 2014 and 2015 Q1 EIA-923 Monthly Time Series File Q1'2015 Q1'2014 State MW CF CF Arizona 227 15.8% 21.0% California 5,182 13.2% 19.8% Colorado 2,299 36.4% 40.9% Hawaii 171 21.0% 18.3% Iowa 4,977 40.8% 44.4% Idaho 532 28.3% 42.0% Illinois 3,524 38.0% 42.3% Indiana 1,537 32.6% 29.8% Kansas 2,898 41.0% 46.5% Massachusetts 29 41.7% 52.4% Maryland 120 38.6% 37.6% Maine 401 40.1% 36.3% Michigan 1,374 37.9% 36.7% Minnesota 2,440 42.4% 45.5% Missouri 454 29.3% 35.5% Montana 605 46.4% 43.5% North Dakota 1,767 42.8% 49.8% Nebraska 518 49.4% 53.2% New Hampshire 147 36.7% 34.6% New Mexico 773 23.1% 40.8% Nevada 152 22.1% 22.0% New York 1,712 33.5% 32.8% Ohio 403 37.6% 41.7% Oklahoma 3,158 36.2% 45.1% Oregon 3,044 15.3% 23.7% Pennsylvania 1,278 39.2% 40.0% South Dakota 779 47.4% 50.4% Tennessee 29 22.2% 26.4% Texas 12,308 27.5% 37.7% Utah 306 16.5% 24.2% Vermont 109 39.1% 33.1% Washington 2,724 20.6% 29.5% Wisconsin 608 33.4% 38.7% West Virginia 583 37.8% 38.0% Wyoming 1,340 39.3% 52.2% Total 58,507 31.6% 37.7% SPREADSHEET PREPARED BY WINDACTION.ORG Based on U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D Avian Fatality Studies in the Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc
    Appendix D Avian Fatality Studies in the Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc. (WEST) Database This page intentionally left blank. Avian Fatality Studies in the Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc (West) Database Appendix D APPENDIX D. AVIAN FATALITY STUDIES IN THE WESTERN ECOSYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, INC. (WEST) DATABASE Alite, CA (09-10) Chatfield et al. 2010 Alta Wind I, CA (11-12) Chatfield et al. 2012 Alta Wind I-V, CA (13-14) Chatfield et al. 2014 Alta Wind II-V, CA (11-12) Chatfield et al. 2012 Alta VIII, CA (12-13) Chatfield and Bay 2014 Barton I & II, IA (10-11) Derby et al. 2011a Barton Chapel, TX (09-10) WEST 2011 Beech Ridge, WV (12) Tidhar et al. 2013 Beech Ridge, WV (13) Young et al. 2014a Big Blue, MN (13) Fagen Engineering 2014 Big Blue, MN (14) Fagen Engineering 2015 Big Horn, WA (06-07) Kronner et al. 2008 Big Smile, OK (12-13) Derby et al. 2013b Biglow Canyon, OR (Phase I; 08) Jeffrey et al. 2009a Biglow Canyon, OR (Phase I; 09) Enk et al. 2010 Biglow Canyon, OR (Phase II; 09-10) Enk et al. 2011a Biglow Canyon, OR (Phase II; 10-11) Enk et al. 2012b Biglow Canyon, OR (Phase III; 10-11) Enk et al. 2012a Blue Sky Green Field, WI (08; 09) Gruver et al. 2009 Buffalo Gap I, TX (06) Tierney 2007 Buffalo Gap II, TX (07-08) Tierney 2009 Buffalo Mountain, TN (00-03) Nicholson et al. 2005 Buffalo Mountain, TN (05) Fiedler et al. 2007 Buffalo Ridge, MN (Phase I; 96) Johnson et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Guide to Studying Wind Energy/Wildlife Interactions
    Prepared for the National Wind Coordinating Collaborative June 2011 Acknowledgments This report was funded by the Wind and Water Power Program, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231. The NWCC Wildlife Workgroup thanks Patrick Gilman (U.S. Department of Energy), Karin Sinclair (National Renewable Energy Laboratory), and the Wildlife Workgroup Core Group and blind peer reviewers selected by NREL to review the document on behalf of the Workgroup. Abby Arnold (Kearns & West), Taylor Kennedy (RESOLVE, Inc.), and Lauren Flinn (RESOLVE, Inc.) facilitated the proposal selection process for preparation of the document and the NWCC Wildlife Workgroup document review process. Technical editing provided by Susan Savitt Schwartz, Editor Andrea Palochak, WEST, Inc., Associate Editor Cover design created by Jason Huerta, Bat Conservation International. Cover photo credits - Background: Wind turbines at the Foote Creek Rim Wind Project in Wyoming (photo by Ed Arnett, Bat Conservation International; Insets from right to left: Golden eagle (photo courtesy of iStockphoto LP © 2010), male greater sage grouse (photo courtesy of iStockphoto LP © 2010), hoary bat (photo by Merlin D. Tuttle, Bat Conservation International), mountain bluebird (photo courtesy of WEST Inc.), Rocky Mountain elk (photo courtesy of Puget Sound Energy). Prepared for: National Wind Coordinating Collaborative c/o RESOLVE 1255 23rd Street, Suite 275 Washington, DC 20037 www.nationalwind.org June 2011 COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE TO STUDYING WIND ENERGY/WILDLIFE INTERACTIONS Principal Authors Dale Strickland, WEST, Inc., Cheyenne, Wyoming Edward Arnett, Bat Conservation International, Inc., Austin, Texas Wallace Erickson, WEST, Inc., Cheyenne, Wyoming Douglas Johnson, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Tracking the Sun VIII.Pdf
    Tracking the Sun VIII The Installed Price of Residential and Non-Residential Photovoltaic Systems in the United States Primary authors Galen Barbose and Naïm Darghouth With contributions from Dev Millstein, Mike Spears, and Ryan Wiser (LBNL) Michael Buckley and Rebecca Widiss (Exeter Associates) Nick Grue (NREL) August 2015 Tracking the Sun VIII The Installed Price of Residential and Non-Residential Photovoltaic Systems in the United States Primary Authors: Galen Barbose and Naïm Darghouth Energy Technologies Area, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Executive Summary ............................................................................. 1 1. Introduction ...................................................................................... 5 2. Data Sources, Methods, and Sample Description .............................. 7 Data Sources ............................................................................................................... 7 Data Standardization and Cleaning ............................................................................. 8 Sample Size ................................................................................................................. 9 Sample Characteristics .............................................................................................. 10 3. Historical Trends in Median Installed Prices .................................... 15 Long-Term Installed Price Trends ............................................................................. 15 Module and Non-Module Cost
    [Show full text]
  • Final Environmental Assessment (EA) Is Tiered to the Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for the Eagle Rule Revision (PEIS; USFWS 2016B)
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Final Environmental Assessment Biglow Canyon Wind Farm Eagle Permit Prepared by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Migratory Birds and Habitat Program 911 NE 11th Ave Portland, OR 97232 May 2020 i Biglow Wind Farm –Final EA Contents Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................ iv Chapter 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Environmental Assessment Overview ............................................................................. 1 1.2. Project Description ........................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2.0 Purpose and Need ................................................................................................... 6 2.1. Purposes and Need for Federal Action ............................................................................. 6 2.2. Decision to be Made ......................................................................................................... 6 2.3. Tiered EA ......................................................................................................................... 8 2.4. Authorities and Statutory and Regulatory Framework ..................................................... 8 2.5. Scope of Analysis ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Renewables Portfolio Standards in the United States: a Status Update
    Renewables Portfolio Standards in the United States: A Status Update Galen Barbose Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory State-Federal RPS Collaborative National Summit on RPS Washington, D.C. November 6, 2013 This analysis was funded by the National Electricity Delivery Division of the Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability and by the Solar Energy Technologies Office of the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE- AC02-05CH11231. Summary of State RPS Experience-to-Date • State RPS policies have been a significant driver for renewable energy growth in the United States and have largely held up against recent political challenges • Generally high levels of compliance achieved thus far • Compliance costs have thus far remained relatively modest, though questions exist about future costs • Significant solar and other RE capacity is required to meet future RPS targets, but is well in-line with pace of additions in recent years • Significant challenges nevertheless exist to meeting future RPS obligations (e.g., managing REC price volatility, transmission, integration, siting) 2 RPS Policies Exist in 29 States and DC 7 More States Have Non-Binding Goals Existing State RPS Policies Apply to 55% of Total U.S. Retail Electricity Sales in 2012 WA: 15% by 2020 MN: 25% by 2025 ME: 40% by 2017 MT: 15% by 2015 Xcel: 30% by 2020 NH: 24.8% by 2025 ND: 10% by 2015 MI: 10% by 2015 VT: 20% by 2017 MA: 11.1% by 2009 +1%/yr OR: 25% by 2025 (large utilities) SD: 10% by 2015 WI:
    [Show full text]
  • Operational Impacts to Raptors (PDF)
    To: John Ford, Director From: Bob Roy County of Humboldt Planning and Building Stantec Consulting Department 30 Park Drive 3015 H Street Topsham, ME 04222 Eureka, California 95501 [email protected] Date: August 23, 2019 Reference: Operational Impacts to Raptors Humboldt Wind has commissioned Western EcoSystems Technology, Inc. (WEST) to review the draft EIR for the Humboldt Wind Project and provide a re-evaluation of the DEIR’s analysis of potential impacts to raptors. WEST is a firm that is expert in conducting ecological studies and analyzing complicated natural resource data. The attached memo provides WEST’s recommended analysis of the likely impacts of the project on raptors. As noted in WEST’s memo, the DEIR appears to overestimate what the likely impacts of the project will be on local and regional raptor populations. The DEIR reviews several data sets but does not set an explicit expectation of what the project’s likely impact will be. Rather, it reviews a range of potential impacts using different datasets and metrics, and then concludes that impacts will be significant and unavoidable after mitigation. However, WEST’s analysis provides compelling evidence that the DEIR’s analysis is flawed and that actual impacts at the project are likely to be significantly less than that stated in the DEIR and would not lead to local or regional populations of raptor species to fall below self-sustaining levels. Key to this analysis, or the difference between the two analyses, is that raptor impacts at the Humboldt project would not be similar to those documented at projects in central and southern California (where raptor use is far greater than at the project) and the fact that raptor use at the project site is very similar to that documented at Hatchet Ridge, where raptor fatalities have been found to be very low after three years of post-construction monitoring.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Solar Technology Adoption in the United States: Empirical Evidence on Effects of State Policies
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses Dissertations and Theses July 2016 Commercial Solar Technology Adoption in the United States: Empirical Evidence on Effects of State Policies Eric Koegler University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/masters_theses_2 Recommended Citation Koegler, Eric, "Commercial Solar Technology Adoption in the United States: Empirical Evidence on Effects of State Policies" (2016). Masters Theses. 354. https://doi.org/10.7275/8486858 https://scholarworks.umass.edu/masters_theses_2/354 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COMMERCIAL SOLAR TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION IN THE UNITED STATES: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE ON EFFECTS OF STATE POLICIES A Thesis Presented By ERIC KOEGLER Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment Of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE May 2016 Department of Resource Economics COMMERCIAL SOLAR TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION IN THE UNITED STATES: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE ON EFFECTS OF STATE POLICIES A Thesis Presented By ERIC KOEGLER Approved as to style and content by: _____________________________________ Christine L. Crago, Chair _____________________________________ Bernard J. Morzuch, Member _____________________________________ Daniel A. Lass, Department Chair Department of Resource Economics DEDICATION To my mother, Holly Reed ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank Professor Christine Crago for her advice and support over the past year. I would also like to thank Professor Bernie Morzuch for piquing my interest in Resource Economic as a junior when he allowed me to be a Teaching Assistant.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Markets: a New Asset Class
    ENVIRONMENTAL MARKETS: A NEW ASSET CLASS Richard L. Sandor Nathan J. Clark Murali Kanakasabai Rafael L. Marques Named Endowments The Research Foundation of CFA Institute The Research Foundation of CFA Institute acknowledges with sincere gratitude the Board of Trustees generous contributions of the Named Endowment participants listed below. 2013–2014 Gifts of at least US$100,000 qualify donors for membership in the Named Endowment category, which recognizes in perpetuity the commitment toward unbiased, practitioner- Chair John T. “JT” Grier, CFA John D. Rogers, CFA oriented, relevant research that these firms and individuals have expressed through Jeffery V. Bailey, CFA Virginia Retirement System CFA Institute their generous support of the Research Foundation of CFA Institute. Target Corporation Pranay Gupta, CFA Brian Singer, CFA Manu Bhaskaran Lombard Odier Darier William Blair, Dynamic Ameritech Meiji Mutual Life Insurance Company Centennial Asia Advisors Pte Hentsch (Asia) Limited Allocation Strategies Limited Anonymous Miller Anderson & Sherrerd, LLP Walter V. “Bud” Haslett, Jr., CFA Wayne H. Wagner Renee Kathleen-Doyle Blasky, CFA Institute Venice Beach, CA Robert D. Arnott John B. Neff, CFA CFA George R. Hoguet, CFA, FRM Arnold S. Wood Theodore R. Aronson, CFA Nikko Securities Co., Ltd. Vista Capital Limited State Street Global Advisors Martingale Asset Asahi Mutual Life Nippon Life Insurance Company of Japan Dwight Churchill, CFA Aaron Low, CFA Management Batterymarch Financial Management Nomura Securities Co., Ltd. Sunapee, NH Lumen Advisors Boston Company Payden & Rygel William Fung Alan Meder, CFA Boston Partners Asset Management, L.P. Provident National Bank London Business School Duff & Phelps Investment Gary P. Brinson, CFA Frank K.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Trends in the US Voluntary Green Power Market
    Status and Trends in the U.S. Voluntary Green Power Market (2012 Data) J. Heeter and T. Nicholas National Renewable Energy Laboratory NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. Technical Report NREL/TP-6A20-60210 October 2013 Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Status and Trends in the U.S. Voluntary Green Power Market (2012 Data) J. Heeter and T. Nicholas National Renewable Energy Laboratory Prepared under Task Nos. SA12.0324 and SM13.1580 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report 15013 Denver West Parkway NREL/TP-6A20-60210 Golden, CO 80401 October 2013 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Construction Avian and Bat Mortality Monitoring at the Alta X Wind Energy Project Kern County, California
    Post-Construction Avian and Bat Mortality Monitoring at the Alta X Wind Energy Project Kern County, California Final Report for the Second Year of Operation April 2015 – April 2016 Prepared for Alta Wind X, LLC 14633 Willow Springs Road Mojave, California 93501 Prepared by: Joel Thompson, Carmen Boyd, and John Lombardi Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc. 415 West 17th Street, Suite 200 Cheyenne, Wyoming 82001 July 22, 2016 Alta X Year 2 Final Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Alta Wind X, LLC (Alta Wind X) has constructed a wind energy facility in Kern County, California, referred to as the Alta X Wind Energy Project (“Alta X” or “Project”). Consistent with the Alta East Wind Project Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR), Alta Wind X is committed to conducting avian and bat mortality monitoring at the Project during the first, second, and third years of operation. Following construction in the spring of 2014, Alta Wind X contracted Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc. (WEST) to develop and implement a study protocol for post- construction monitoring at the Project for the purpose of estimating the impacts of the wind energy facility on birds and bats. The following report describes the methods and results of mortality monitoring conducted during the second year of operation of the Project, April 2015 to April 2016. As stated in the DEIR, the goal of the mortality monitoring study is determine the level of incidental injury and mortality to populations of avian or bat species in the vicinity of the Project. To this end, WEST designed and implemented a 3-year study to determine the level of bird and bat mortality attributable to collisions with wind turbines at the facility on an annual basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Hearing Before
    Public Hearing before SENATE ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY COMMITTEE “The committee will be hearing testimony from the Renewable Energy Stakeholder Working Groups as follows: Mitigating Solar Development Volatility; Achieving Global Warming Response Act Goals; Reconsidering Incentives for Class I Renewables; and Decoupling Utility Regulation” LOCATION: Committee Room 6 DATE: July 10, 2014 State House Annex 9:00 a.m. Trenton, New Jersey MEMBERS OF COMMITTEE PRESENT: Senator Bob Smith, Chair Senator Linda R. Greenstein, Vice Chair Senator Christopher "Kip" Bateman Senator Samuel D. Thompson ALSO PRESENT: Jeffrey T. Climpson Kevil Duhon Carlos Cruz Office of Legislative Services Senate Majority Senate Republican Committee Aide Committee Aide Committee Aide Hearing Recorded and Transcribed by The Office of Legislative Services, Public Information Office, Hearing Unit, State House Annex, PO 068, Trenton, New Jersey JUDITH L. HOROWITZ BOB SMITH Office of Legislative Services Chairman Committee Aide (609) 847-3855 LINDA R. GREENSTEIN (609) 292-0561 fax Vice-Chairwoman MICHAEL MOLIMOCK Office of Legislative Services RICHARD J. CODEY N e w J e r s e y S t a t e L e g i s l a t u r e Committee Aide CHRISTOPHER “KIP” BATEMAN (609) 847-3855 SAMUEL D. THOMPSON SENATE ENVIRONMENT (609) 292-0561 fax AND ENERGY COMMITTEE STATE HOUSE ANNEX PO BOX 068 TRENTON NJ 08625-0068 P U B L I C H E A R I N G N O T I C E The Senate Environment and Energy Committee will hold a public hearing on Thursday, July 10, 2014 at 9:00 AM in Committee Room 6, 1st Floor, State House Annex, Trenton, New Jersey.
    [Show full text]