DOCSLIB.ORG

Berliner Mittelalter

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

1 Berliner Mittelalter- und Fr ühneuzeitforschung 2 3 4 5 6 Band 18 7 8 9 10 11 Herausgegeben vom 12 ä 13 Vorstand des Interdisziplin ren Zentrums 14 Mittelalter – Renaissance – Fr ühe Neuzeit 15 16 mit der Redaktion des Interdisziplin ären Zentrums 17 Mittelalter – Renaissance – Fr ühe Neuzeit, Berlin 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 1 Bettina Noak (Hg.) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Wissenstransfer und Auctoritas in der 9 fr ühneuzeitlichen 10 11 niederl ändischsprachigen Literatur 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 & 37 V R unipress 38 39 40 41 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek 24 25 Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen 26 Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über 27 http://dnb.d-nb.de abrufbar. 28 29 Mit freundlicher Unterst üzung der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft 30 31 ISBN 978-3-8471-0310-3 32 ISBN 978-3-8470-0310-6 (E-Book) 33 34 2014, V &R unipress in G öttingen / www.vr-unipress.de 35 Alle Rechte vorbehalten. Das Werk und seine Teile sind urheberrechtlich gesch ützt. Jede 36 Verwertung in anderen als den gesetzlich zugelassenen F ällen bedarf der vorherigen 37 schriftlichen Einwilligung des Verlages. 38 Printed in Germany. 39 Druck und Bindung: CPI buchbuecher.de GmbH, Birkach 40 41 Gedruckt auf alterungsbest ändigem Papier. 1 Inhalt 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Danksagung . 7 13 14 Bettina Noak 15 Einleitung . 9 16 17 1 Wissenstransfer und der Umgang mit Autoritäten in der 18 außereuropäischen Begegnung 19 Christina Brauner 20 Das Verschwinden des Augenzeugen. Transformationen von Text und 21 Autorschaftskonzeption in der deutschen Übersetzung des 22 Guinea-Reiseberichts von Pieter de Marees (1602) und seiner Rezeption . 19 23 24 Siegfried Huigen 25 FranÅois Valentyns Beschreibung einer Meerjungfrau in Oud en Nieuw 26 Oost-Indin und die Konstruktion von Wissen . 61 27 28 Maria-Theresia Leuker 29 Wissenstransfer und Dritter Raum. Auctoritas, Empirie und local 30 knowledge in den naturkundlichen Schriften des Georg Everhard 31 Rumphius (1627–1702) . 73 32 33 2 Spiel und Spiritualismus als Felder des Wissenstransfers 34 Arjan van Dixhoorn 35 Nature, Play and the Middle Dutch Knowledge Community of Brussels in 36 the late Fifteenth and Early Sixteenth Centuries . 37 97 38 Julie Rogiest 39 Knowledge and Auctoritas in Coornhert’s Zedekunst ........... 40 121 41 6 Inhalt 1 Esteban Law 2 Hermeti rechte meeningh. Zum Hermetismus des Abraham Willemsz van 3 Beyerland . 145 4 5 3 Wissenstransfer in Translation und Poetologie 6 Marco Prandoni 7 Vive la France, À bas la France! Contradictory Attitude Toward the 8 Appropriation of French Cultural Elements in the Second Half of the 9 Sixteenth Century: the Forewords of «Modern« Poetry Collections . 177 10 11 Francesca Terrenato 12 Translation, Imitation and Criticism: Vasari’s Lives and Machiavelli’s 13 Prince in the Early Seventeenth-century Dutch Republic . 193 14 15 Jeroen Jansen 16 Gerbrand Bredero’s handling of Antiquity Transfer of classical knowledge 17 into seventeenth century vernacular culture . 209 18 19 Christian Sinn 20 Embleme der Konversion. Religi öse auctoritas als Legitimation 21 fr ühneuzeitlicher Poetologie: Hermann Hugo und Jacob Cats . 225 22 23 4 Die Konstruktion politischer Autoritäten 24 25 Rita Schlusemann ä 26 Politik und Religion: Niederl ndisch-deutscher Wissenstransfer im 27 16. Jahrhundert . 249 28 29 Mike Keirsbilck 30 The tongue, the mouth and safeguard of freedom: Towards a 31 governmental reading of Vondel’s Palamedes (1625) . 275 32 33 Kurzbiographien der Autorinnen und Autoren . 295 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 1 Mike Keirsbilck 2 3 4 The tongue, the mouth and safeguard of freedom: 5 Palamedes 6 Towards a governmental reading of Vondel’s 7 (1625) 8 9 10 11 12 By the end of 1624, Vondel began to write Palamedes, a play that most critics 13 have taken to be an allegory on the execution of Johan van Oldenbarnevelt, grand 14 pensionary of the Dutch Republic, by Maurice, prince of Orange. Maurice and 15 Van Oldenbarnevelt led the Republic through some turbulent times. By the year 16 1617, however, their collaboration turned into a bitter struggle for power. When 17 Van Oldenbarnevelt undermined Maurice’s military authority by appointing 18 urban militias, Maurice had enough. In 1618, he made a coup and had Van 19 Oldenbarnevelt, together with some of his most prominent supporters, arrested 20 on grounds of treason. At his trial, which was in fact nothing more than a mock 21 trial, Van Oldenbarnevelt was sentenced to death. By his actions Maurice came 22 off best politically, but he lost his status with at least part of the people. 1 As we all 23 know, Vondel chose the side of Van Oldenbarnevelt and strongly rejected 24 Maurice’s actions. As a result, he started working on Palamedes in order to 25 ventilate his indignation. Due to the contemporary nature of the events it was, of 26 course, impossible to give chapter and verse. Therefore, the poet made use of 27 Virgil’s Aeneid and Ovid’s Metamorphoses with the tale of the wrongfully ac- 28 cused Palamedes. 2 29 It is apparent that Vondel had political motives with his play. For the play’s 30 original audience it was abundantly clear that Palamedes, oft Vermoorde On- 31 nooselheyd actually dealt with the »murder« of the innocent Johan Van Old- 32 enbarnevelt. In times when the public opinion was shaped with pamphlets, 33 treatises and plays, Vondel really made a stand. At first sight, Vondel tried to win 34 the audience over to his view that Palamedes, or Van Oldenbarnevelt, was 35 36 37 1 For a comprehensive account of the events see B en Knapen : De Man en zijn Staat: Johan van 38 Oldenbarnevelt 1547–1610 , Amsterdam 2008, pp. 287–331; J an den Tex: Oldenbarnevelt , 39 Haarlem 1966, III, pp. 488–792; J onathan I. Israel : The Dutch Republic: Its Rise, Greatness, and Fall 1477–1806 , Oxford 1998, pp. 433–439. 40 2 P ublius Virgilius Maro : Aeneis , Amsterdam 2008, Book II, 77–104. And P ublius Ovidius 41 Naso : Metamorphosen , Amsterdam 2009, Book XIII, 30–70, 307–312. 276 Mike Keirsbilck 1 wrongfully accused and died an unjust death. 3 In the later criticism of the play, 2 this is still the general consensus. In 1879, Theodoor Jorissen also came to this 3 conclusion in his study on Palamedes en Gysbrecht van Aemstel. 4 Later, W.A.P. 4 Smit in Van Pascha tot Noah (1956) stressed the influence of Seneca on Vondel’s 5 play, but he also concluded that it was an allegory camouflaged as an ancient 6 tragedy. 5 In 1999, Lia van Gemert argued in Tussen de Bedrijven Door? that the 7 choruses all represent a political faction pro or contra Palamedes or Van Old- 8 enbarnevelt.6 More recently in 2005, Klaus Beekman and Ralf Gr üttemeier wrote 9 an article in which they show that Vondel portrayed Van Oldenbarnevelt as 10 Palamedes, which made him subject to censorship. 7 In brief, nearly all critics of 11 the play focus on the Van Oldenbarnevelt allegory. Other analyses made by, for 12 example, Johan Gerritsen deal with textual criticism and the print history of the 13 play. 8 Recently, there have been some studies that refrain from focusing pri- 14 marily on the allegory. In Fortuna, Fatum en Providentia Dei in de Nederlandse 15 Tragedie 1600–1720, Jan Konst supports the idea that Vondel resisted the notion 16 of the double predestination in favour of an ideology that builds upon the idea of 17 freedom of choice. 9 Bettina Noak, in her article »Taal en Geweld in Enkele 18 Bijbelse Treurspelen van Joost van den Vondel«, argued that the language of 19 Agamemnon is that of a tyrant, a conclusion that she also ties to Vondel’s 20 reception of Maurice. 10 In Vondel Belicht 11 and the 2009 English adaptation 21 22 23 24 3 See for example P iet Calis : Vondel: Het Verhaal van zijn Leven , Amsterdam 2008, pp. 12– 25 14; J ohannes Franciscus Maria Sterck, Het Leven van Joost van den Vondel , Haarlem 1926, p. 28; P iet Oomes : Joost van den Vondel , Leuven 1938, pp. 27–28; J ohannes Melles : 26 Joost van den Vondel: een Geschiedenis van zijn Leven , Utrecht 1957, p. 43. 27 4 T heodoor Jorissen : Palamedes en Gysbreght van Aemstel: Kritische Studin , Amsterdam, 28 1879, pp. 1–56. isse Alfred Pierre Smit: 29 5 W Van Pascha tot Noah , Zwolle 1956, pp. 100–125. 6 L iavan Gemert : Tussen de Bedrijven door? De Functie van de Rei in Nederlandstalig Toneel 30 1556–1625 , Deventer 1999, pp. 236–238. 31 7 K laus Beeckman and R alf Grüttemeier: Censuur en literatuur: Joost van den Vondels 32 Palamedes en Hendrik Smeeks’ Krinke Kesmes , in: ibid., De Wet van de Letter , Am- sterdam 2005, pp. 11–27. 33 8 J ohan Gerritsen: De eerste druk van de Palamedes , in: H enry F. Hofman and K oert van 34 der Hof (eds.), Uit Bibliotheektuin en Informatieveld: Opstellen aangeboden aan Dr. D. 35 Grosheide bij zijn afscheid als bibliothecaris van de Rijksuniversiteit te Utrecht , Utrecht 1978, 36 pp. 219–230. 9 J an Konst: Fortuna, Fatum en Providentia Dei in de Nederlandse Tragedie 1600–1720 , 37 Hilversum 2003, pp.
Recommended publications
  • UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations

    UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations

    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Righteous Citizens: The Lynching of Johan and Cornelis DeWitt,The Hague, Collective Violens, and the Myth of Tolerance in the Dutch Golden Age, 1650-1672 Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2636q95m Author DeSanto, Ingrid Frederika Publication Date 2018 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Righteous Citizens: The Lynching of Johan and Cornelis DeWitt, The Hague, Collective Violence, and the Myth of Tolerance in the Dutch Golden Age, 1650-1672. A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in History by Ingrid Frederika DeSanto 2018 ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION Righteous Citizens: The Lynching of Johan and Cornelis DeWitt, The Hague, Collective Violence, and the Myth of Tolerance in the Dutch Golden Age, 1650-1672 by Ingrid Frederika DeSanto Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Los Angeles Professor Margaret C Jacob, Chair In The Hague, on August 20 th , 1672, the Grand Pensionary of Holland, Johan DeWitt and his brother Cornelis DeWitt were publicly killed, their bodies mutilated and hanged by the populace of the city. This dissertation argues that this massacre remains such an unique event in Dutch history, that it needs thorough investigation. Historians have focused on short-term political causes for the eruption of violence on the brothers’ fatal day. This work contributes to the existing historiography by uncovering more long-term political and social undercurrents in Dutch society. In doing so, issues that may have been overlooked previously are taken into consideration as well.
  • A Short History of Holland, Belgium and Luxembourg

    A Short History of Holland, Belgium and Luxembourg

    A Short History of Holland, Belgium and Luxembourg Foreword ............................................................................2 Chapter 1. The Low Countries until A.D.200 : Celts, Batavians, Frisians, Romans, Franks. ........................................3 Chapter 2. The Empire of the Franks. ........................................5 Chapter 3. The Feudal Period (10th to 14th Centuries): The Flanders Cloth Industry. .......................................................7 Chapter 4. The Burgundian Period (1384-1477): Belgium’s “Golden Age”......................................................................9 Chapter 5. The Habsburgs: The Empire of Charles V: The Reformation: Calvinism..........................................10 Chapter 6. The Rise of the Dutch Republic................................12 Chapter 7. Holland’s “Golden Age” ..........................................15 Chapter 8. A Period of Wars: 1650 to 1713. .............................17 Chapter 9. The 18th Century. ..................................................20 Chapter 10. The Napoleonic Interlude: The Union of Holland and Belgium. ..............................................................22 Chapter 11. Belgium Becomes Independent ...............................24 Chapter 13. Foreign Affairs 1839-19 .........................................29 Chapter 14. Between the Two World Wars. ................................31 Chapter 15. The Second World War...........................................33 Chapter 16. Since the Second World War: European Co-operation:
  • Uva-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)

    Uva-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)

    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Masters of war: state, capital, and military enterprise in the Dutch cycle of accumulation (1600-1795) Brandon, P. Publication date 2013 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Brandon, P. (2013). Masters of war: state, capital, and military enterprise in the Dutch cycle of accumulation (1600-1795). General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:25 Sep 2021 Chapter 5 The structural crisis of the federal-brokerage state The preceding chapters have shown that war did not lead to a transformation from brokerage practices to nationalization, but instead strengthened the federal-brokerage aspects of the Dutch Republican state. However, this tendency was reversed in dramatic fashion at the end of the eighteenth century.
  • Popular Xenophobia During the Seventeenth Century Anglo-Dutch Wars

    Popular Xenophobia During the Seventeenth Century Anglo-Dutch Wars

    Wright State University CORE Scholar Browse all Theses and Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2016 Allies to Enemies: Popular Xenophobia during the Seventeenth Century Anglo-Dutch Wars Adrian T. van der Velde Wright State University Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all Part of the History Commons Repository Citation van der Velde, Adrian T., "Allies to Enemies: Popular Xenophobia during the Seventeenth Century Anglo- Dutch Wars" (2016). Browse all Theses and Dissertations. 1518. https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all/1518 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Browse all Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ALLIES TO ENEMIES: POPULAR XENOPHOBIA DURING THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY ANGLO-DUTCH WARS A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts By ADRIAN THOMAS VAN DER VELDE B.A., Cedarville University, 2005 2016 Wright State University WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL April 27, 2016 I HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION BY Adrian Thomas van der Velde ENTITLED Allies to Enemies: Popular Xenophobia During the Seventeenth Century Anglo-Dutch Wars BE ACCEPTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Master of Arts. __________________________________________ Paul Lockhart, Ph.D. Thesis Director __________________________________________ Carol Herringer, Ph.D. Department Chair Committee on Final Examination _______________________________________ Roy Vice, Ph. D. ______________________________________ Christopher Beck, Ph. D. _______________________________________ Robert E.W.Fyffe, Ph.D.
  • A Study of the Hybrid Genre of Seventeenth-Century Dutch Family

    A Study of the Hybrid Genre of Seventeenth-Century Dutch Family

    Familial Identity and Site Specificity: A Study of the Hybrid Genre of Seventeenth-Century Dutch Family-Landscape Portraiture By © 2017 Denise Giannino M.A., University College London, 2005 M.A., Florida State University, 2006 Submitted to the graduate degree program in Art History and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Chair: Linda Stone-Ferrier David Cateforis Stephen Goddard Anne D Hedeman William Keel Date Defended: 3 November 2017 ii The dissertation committee for Denise Giannino certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Familial Identity and Site Specificity: A Study of the Hybrid Genre of Seventeenth-Century Dutch Family-Landscape Portraiture Chair: Linda Stone-Ferrier Date Approved: 3 November 2017 iii Abstract In the seventeenth century, the proliferation of Dutch family portraits among the broad middle class was a distinctive facet of artistic production. Within this visual trend, the vast majority of such paintings present the sitters in outdoor environs rather than the domestic sphere. This dissertation focuses on such images and adopts the term “family-landscape portrait” to highlight the hybrid nature of the images that commemorate a particular family within a specific locale. I consider the particularities of seventeenth-century Dutch family-landscape portraiture as a separate pictorial genre and attend to the ways in which these images construct identity and generate meaning, including through the blending of portraiture and landscape conventions. In order to investigate the complex meanings of family-landscape portraits, this dissertation will consider the images from the perspective of the biographical circumstances of the sitters’ lives; contemporary cultural, socioeconomic and political issues that inflect the choice of symbols or locale; and the pictorial traditions from which the images stem.
  • The Dutch Army and the Military Revolutions (1588-1688)

    The Dutch Army and the Military Revolutions (1588-1688)

    Olaf van Nimwegen The Dutch Army and the Military Revolutions (1588-1688) Since the 1950s Michael Roberts’ idea of a military revolution between 1560-1660 has become a common feature of all military studies dealing with the early modern period, and this seems to be particularly the case in the English speaking world. Roberts argued that the introduction of firearms led to new tactics. The complexities of the new way of fighting required stricter discipline and a higher level of training. Soldiers became expensive articles to be retained in peacetime. The development of standing armies required higher taxes, and hence the creation of a gov- ernmental apparatus to effect this. "The transformation in the scale of war led inevitably to an increase in the authority of the state. (… ) This development, and the new style of warfare itself, called for new adminis- trative methods and standards; and the new administration was from the beginning centralized and royal." Further army growth was now possible, increasing the scale of war and the impact on society.1 However, although Roberts and subsequently Geoffrey Parker2 made important contribu- tions to the debate concerning the relationship between military change and society at large, it should be remembered that Roberts was elaborat- ing a familiar theme. The notion that the Dutch army reforms instigated by the two Nassau cousins Maurice and W illiam Louis ushered in a new era in military history was already well established. The 1934 PhD thesis by the Dutch military historian J.W. W ijn – 4et krijgswezen in den tijd van prins Maurits – scientifically underscored the widely held view that the Dutch army really came into being thanks to the good care of Maurice.
  • Exploring the Market for Government Bonds in the Dutch Republic (1600-1800)1

    Exploring the Market for Government Bonds in the Dutch Republic (1600-1800)1

    Exploring the market for government bonds in the Dutch Republic (1600-1800)1 Oscar Gelderblom and Joost Jonker (Utrecht University) Draft, revised 13 December 2006 Comments welcome at: [email protected] or [email protected] Introduction One common characteristic of Europe’s most developed economies before the Industrial Revolution – i.e. the Italian city states, the Dutch Republic, and England – was their modernization of public finance. Instead of relying on loans from a small group of merchant bankers, tax farmers, or other magnats, the governments of these states began to sell bonds to a much larger crowd of savers. The earmarking of future tax revenues for interest payments on these loans, combined with the transferability of bonds issued, created a funded public debt. In 1967 Peter Dickson coined the term financial revolution to describe the fundamental transformation of public debt management in England after the Glorious Revolution (1688).2 Once the new king, William of Orange, had credibly committed to servicing the crown’s debts, claims on 1 We are indebted to Irene Mangnus, Kirsten Hulsker, Jaco Zuijderduijn, and Heleen Kole for excellent research assistance. Our analysis of the asset management of Amsterdams Burgerweeshuis builds on the MA Thesis of Irene Mangnus on this very subject. Maarten Prak let us use his research notes on Leiden’s political elite in the eighteenth century. Jan Lucassen and Piet Lourens shared their data on the property of Dutch guilds in 1799 with us. We thank Marjolein ‘t Hart, Larry Neal, and Jeremy Atack for comments on an earlier draft of this paper.
  • The Echoes of the Brothers De La Court in Early Eighteenth-Century Republican Publications

    The Echoes of the Brothers De La Court in Early Eighteenth-Century Republican Publications

    The echoes of the brothers De la Court in early eighteenth-century republican publications Verhandeling van de vryheid in den burgerstaet Hollands Aeloude Vryheid, Buyten Het Stadhouderschap Haec libertatis ergo Of brandmerk van de stadhouderlike regering De Bataafsche vrijheid en tirannye der Graven en Stadhouders De vryheydt der Staten van Holland ende Westvriesland Hollandsche Spectator Thesis RMA Ancient, Medieval and Renaissance Studies, Renaissance track Ir. Jan Fongers, Solisnr.: 3935019 Supervisor: Dr. D.L.M. Onnekink Second Reader: Dr. A.V. Weststeijn Date: 27-02-2019 Frontpage: modified image of a painting by Abraham van den Tempel of Pieter de la Court (1662). https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pieter_de_la_Court (accessed 10-01-2019) Table of Contents page Introduction 1 The brothers De la Court in context 3 Historiography 4 1. Methodology 10 1.1 Introduction 10 1.2 Political Discourse Analysis 11 1.3 Intertextuality 13 1.4 Corpus 15 2. The second Stadtholderless Period, an overview 18 3. Results 26 3.1 Introduction 26 3.2 Constitutional premises 27 3.2.1 Popular government the oldest and most lawful government 28 3.2.2 Monarchy and Court 30 3.2.4 Geweld ende bedrog 31 3.2.5 A mixed government 32 3.2.6 Freedom versus slavery 33 3.2.7 A true republic is incompatible with a monarchical state 35 3.2.8 A Stadtholderate is equal to a monarchy 37 3.2.9 The Counts of Holland are servants of the Provincial States 39 3.2.10 Discord as an instrument of power 41 3.2.11 Capitain-Generaal as stepping stone 43 3.2.12 Discussion 44 3.3 Political
  • Studies in the History of Political Thought

    Studies in the History of Political Thought

    The Citizenship Experiment <UN> Studies in the History of Political Thought Series Editor Annelien de Dijn (Utrecht University) Advisory Board Janet Coleman (London School of Economics and Political Science, UK) Vittor Ivo Comparato (University of Perugia, Italy) Jacques Guilhaumou (cnrs, France) John Marshall (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA) Markku Peltonen (University of Helsinki, Finland) volume 15 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/ship <UN> The Citizenship Experiment Contesting the Limits of Civic Equality and Participation in the Age of Revolutions By René Koekkoek leiden | boston <UN> This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC 4.0 license, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. Further information and the complete license text can be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc/4.0/ The terms of the CC license apply only to the original material. The use of material from other sources (indicated by a reference) such as diagrams, illustrations, photos and text samples may require further permission from the respective copyright holder. An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libraries working with Knowledge Unlatched. More information about the initiative can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org. Cover illustration: Carel Frederik Bendorp (1736–1814), Allegorie op de Conventie (1795), Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam. For a detailed description: see page ix. The Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available online at http://catalog.loc.gov LC record available at http://lccn.loc.gov/2019038014 Typeface for the Latin, Greek, and Cyrillic scripts: “Brill”.
  • The Binnenhof1 2 the Binnenhof the Dutch Centre of Government a Brief History the Binnenhof (Inner Court) Is a Square in the the Hague City Centre

    The Binnenhof1 2 the Binnenhof the Dutch Centre of Government a Brief History the Binnenhof (Inner Court) Is a Square in the the Hague City Centre

    The Binnenhof1 2 The Binnenhof The Dutch centre of government a brief history The Binnenhof (Inner Court) is a square in the The Hague city centre. At its centre, one finds the Counts of Holland Ridderzaal (Hall of Knights). The square is lined In 1229, Floris IV, Count of Holland from 1222 to 1234, acquired a plot of land near a pond in the woods, on the border of the by parliament and government buildings. It is dunes and the polder. Probably, this area was already the site of a the heart of Dutch government. This is where the farmstead. The Count held court in ’s-Gravenzande and in Leiden, but he wanted to have a hunting lodge between both towns on House of Representatives meets, where the Prime his own property. He ordered the erection of walls of earth and Minister works and where the Ministers hold their wood around the grounds. Floris IV had little time to enjoy his 3 weekly consultations. Once a year, the Senate new property, however, as he was killed in France in 1234. His son William II succeeded him as Count of Holland. He ordered and the House of Representatives meet in the the construction of two new living quarters, which were only Ridderzaal in a Joint Session of the States General. joined together at a far later date (1511). William II’s reign also This session takes place on the third Tuesday of saw the building of the square Haagtoren tower and, some time later, the rooms for the Countess. September, the day upon which the Dutch head In 1248, in gratitude for the military aid he had provided to of state presents the government’s plans for the the Pope, the Dutch Count was crowned King of the German Empire.
  • The Dutch Republic

    The Dutch Republic

    Gale Primary Sources Start at the source. The Dutch Republic David Onnekink University of Utrecht Various source media, State Papers Online EMPOWER™ RESEARCH Introduction threatened to overrun the northern provinces, and thus formed a potential strategic threat to England. Their In his Observations upon the United Provinces of the successes, moreover, might encourage Catholics in Netherlands (1668), the English ambassador, Sir England and endanger English trade with the Low William Temple, enumerated the achievements of the Countries. On 20 August 1585 the Dutch provinces and young state, and concluded that the Dutch Republic had England concluded the treaty of Nonsuch; the first pact become 'the Envy of some, the Fear of others, and the [5] with a European state the Dutch ever concluded. The Wonder of all their Neighbours'.[1] The admiration of Sir Queen decided to send an expeditionary force under the William was not shared by his contemporary, the poet Earl of Leicester in support of the Dutch rebels. In Andrew Marvell. Reflecting upon The Character of response, Philip sent his Armada in 1588 to punish Holland (1653), he argued that Holland 'scarce deserves England and squash the rebellion once and for all. As it the name of land, As but the off-scouring of the British was, the Dutch continued their struggle against the sand … This indigested vomit of the sea, Fell to the Spanish in the Eighty Years War until 1648. The English Dutch by just propriety'.[2] monarchs would continue to patronisingly remind the Dutch of their support for
  • Ballet De La Paix: Staging a Seventeenth-Century Theatre Performance

    Ballet De La Paix: Staging a Seventeenth-Century Theatre Performance

    CHAPTER FOURTEEN BALLET DE LA PAIX: STAGING A SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY THEATRE PERFORMANCE Imre Bésanger Introduction On 7 February 1668 there was much ado at the Buitenhof in The Hague. Noblemen, foreign diplomats and Dutch regents arrived in coaches or on foot at the stables of the Prince of Orange, which had been transformed temporarily into a theatre. All the walls were covered in costly green car- pets. The stables were floored with wooden planks. Everywhere one saw the flickering of wax torches which lit the hall. It was the opening night of the Ballet de la Paix (Ballet of Peace).1 The Grand Duke of Tuscany Cosimo III de’ Medici (1642–1723) had extended his visit to the Dutch Republic just to see the court ballet of the young William III of Orange (1650–1702). At the door, Cosimo was wel- comed by William’s governor, the Dutch nobleman Johan van Gent, who accompanied him to his seat. To De’ Medici’s great disappointment he was seated between two elderly noblemen, Johan Maurits of Nassau and the Count of Hoorn. He was saved when after the ballet he was able to con- verse with young Dutch ladies.2 The ‘saviour’ was none other than the Grand Pensionary of Holland Johan de Witt, who also attended the perfor- mance and had the wit to introduce the Grand Duke to more interesting company. The First Stadtholderless Period, 1650–1672, saw the rise to power of the Grand Pensionary of Holland Johan de Witt (1625–1672) who effectively reigned, with the States General, instead of a stadtholder, normally a prince of Orange.