Implementation on the Status of Implementation of Government Assurances in Selected Districts
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
PARLIA,IVIENT OF UGANDA REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT ASSURANCES AND IMPLEMENTATION ON THE STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF GOVERNMENT ASSURANCES IN SELECTED DISTRICTS OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO PARLIAMENT y,'. PARLIAMENT BUILDING /* KAMPALA _ UGANDA 6, \,f!* k) APRrL,2Ol9 /i r* 1,O. INTRODUCTION 1.1. Committee Maadate 1) In accordance with Rule 176 of the Parliamentary Rules of Procedure 2017, the Committee on Government Assurances and Implementation is mandated to: (a) record and scrutinize the Assurances, Promises and Undertakings given by any Minister, Prime Minister, President, Vice President, in the House from time to time; (b) monitor and evaluate the fullilment of Government Assurances; (c) exercise such other functions that are not covered by paragraphs (a) and (b) as may be allocated to the Committee by the Speaker from time to time. 2) Rule 176(7) further provides for Members of Parliament to report to Parliament, the Assurances, Promises and Undertakings given in their constituencies by the President, Vice President, Prime Minister and Ministers in the House from time to time; 3) Rule 176(2) further states that, where the time frame for implementation of al Assurance is not given by the Minister, the Committee shall determine the category within which it falls and accordingly determine the time frame within which it ought to be implemented; The categories include - (i) EmergencyAssurances. (ii) Short term Assurances. 1 (iii) Midterm Assurances or ( ttC (iv) Long term Assurances. [^/ 1 L.2. This Report Rt. Hon. Speaker, in accordance with its mandate as provided under section 1.1 above, the Committee recorded and scrutinized the fulfillment of promises, undertakings and assurances given by the President, Vice President, Prime Minister and Ministers in Parliament for selected districts. This report is presented in accordance with Rule 176(31 (4) of the 2077 Rules of Procedure of Parliament. It is to be debated by MPs and the issues raised in the debated are to be responded to by the Leader of Government Business during the debate. 1.3. Context and Scope 1.3. 1. Context In a democratic society, political leaders seeking to occupy public offices and those already occupying such offices do make promises in order to win or retain the public trust necessary to occupy or maintain these t5rpe of offices. Problems arise when the promises made by such leaders are not fulfilled at all or not properly and timely fulfilled. After elections, the people become frustrated as they become too powerless to cause the leaders to give accountability on the promises they made but failed to fulfill. Parliament generally and the Parliamentary Committee on Government Assurances and Implementation got established to help the people in such situations by tracking the implementation of promises, undertakings and assurances made from time to time in and outside Parliament in accordance with Rule i76(1)(a) - on the floor of Parliament arrd 17 6(71 - covering their constituencies. By looking at the Administration of Parliament Act, 2006 and the Parliamentary Ruies of Procedure, 2017; this report is presented in the context of: k- W' 2 /1 r, LLw 1. A Parliamentary oversight report presented by one of the accountability Committees (chaired by the opposition) to ensure a high level of accountability in order to Iight against corruption in public offices; here it does so in the context of funds released for implementation of promises and when such funds face the risk of being diverted by public officials for personal gain. 2. A Parliamentary Committee report on Project monitoring and evaluation; and value for money audits to fight against wastage of public resources in the implementation of political promises. 3. A Parliamentary oversight report on Political and Moral accountability of political leaders to fight against political deception and political fraud in elective public offices. In this, the ill this Committee tries to cure is lying and political deception by political leaders in and outside Parliament, as provided for under Rule 176(1) (a) and 176(7). We, members of the committee , believe that: a) A promise is a debt. A debt must be paid. b) Lying is a sin - and it is punishable by God. c) Lying is a crime - and it is punishable by law. d) Political deception is political fraud and it punishable politically. e) Proper and timely fulfillment of promises, undertakings and assurances by leaders is rewarded by the people. 1.3.2. Scope Due to the present significance of electricity in the economy of Uganda generally, and importance of electricit5r in the social lives of individuals, families and communities, the Committee on Government Assurances and Implementations chose to put emphasis on the Enerry Sector as a special case. However, whereas the main focus of the Committee was on the Ener$/ Sector in the selected regions and districts across the country, cross cutting issues out sector were also considered. p<-- 'fr* IF I!fl, lal The Energy Bector In the Energr Sector, over time (from 1986 to date), the political leaders referred to under Rule 176 of the Parliamentary Rules of Procedure 2017, made promises, undertakings and assurances to the people of Uganda to: 1) generate electricity; 2) extend electricity to targeted institutions such as Health Centers, Sub county Headquarters, Schools, home steads; and 3) distribute electricity to various areas covering Trading Centers and Towns, Sub counties, Counties and districts across the country. The Committee followed up on 38 assurances in the Energr Sector; of which 3 were for power generation, namely Karuma Hydropower Dam in Kiryandongo district, Nyagak I Hydropower Dam in Zombo district and Maziba George Power station in Kabale district, compensation of project affected persons (PAPs) in the Karuma Hydropower Dam project, while 34 were for extension of electricity to various areas (see d.etalls ln sectlon 4.2.3). Right Hon. Speaker and Hon. Members; this is the report of the Committee on the extent of implementation of those promises, undertakings and assurances in the Energr Sector. The major focus of this report is on the following key areas under the Energr sector: i) power generation; ii) transmission; iii) compensation of project affected persons; iv) distribution networks to different areas: Trading Centers, Schools, Health facilities and Homes, along the way where the power lines pass from the source to the intended fina1 destination of the power lines; and v) Sequence and balancing of power project implementation from generation, transmission, distribution to connectivity and utilization. lg<- lr 4 w W ldr vi) Utilization of Loans: Parliament of Uganda approved requests by the government of Uganda for external borrowing from different funding agencies including: BADEAI, SFD2, OFIDS, IDB+, AIrDs, ADFD5 and KFAEDT. Some of these loans required counterpart funding from the government of Uganda and government gave assurance to provide counterpart funding. Some of loans took long to be accessed due to government's delay in providing counterpart funding that Parliament had been assured of at the time of loan approval. (bf Cross cutting issues, covered in different sectors The report covers cross cutting issues (i.e. issues outside the energr sector) that the Committee came across in the field even though the major focus was on the Energr Sector. L l Arab Bank for Economic Development '? Social Fund for Development /t.. 3 Opec Fund for lnternational Development a lslamic Development Bank fr* s French Development Agency ' Abu Dhabi Fund for Development t 7 Kuwait Fund for Arab Economic Development 5 t 2.O. METHODOLOGY In accordance with its mandate, the Committee classified the promises undertakings and assurances according to 1 . The time frame within which the assurances ought to have been implemented as per Rule 176(21 as shown below: . Emergency Assurances -6 months r Short term Assurances -1 years (12 months) r Midterm Assurances -2.5 years (3O months) . Long term Assurances -5 years (6O monthsf 2. To ascertain the extent to which the various assurances in the energr sector have been implemented, the Committee interfaced with political leaders and relevant technical officers in the districts of: I. Busoga Sub region: Iganga, Kamuli, Buyende, Kaliro & Bugiri; II. lllest Nile Sub region: Nebbi, Packwach, Arua, Maracha & Moyo III. Bunyoro Sub region: Kiryandongo, Masindi, Buliisa, Kibaale & Kakumiro; IV. Buganda Sub region: Mubende, Kassanda, Mityana & Nakaseke; Bukedi Sub region: Busia & Tororo; u. Sebei reglon: Kapchorwa & Kween; VII. Acholi Sub region: Kitgum & Gulu; VIII. Ankole Sub region: Bushenyi, Rubirizi, Sheema, & Ntungamo; x. Laago Sub rcgion: Apac, Lira, Otuke, Dokolo, Oyam & Kole; x. Teso Sub region: Kaberemaido, Soroti & Kumi; xI. Rwenzori Sub region: Kasese; and XII. Iiigezi Sub region: Kanungu, Rukiga, Kabale & Kisoro. 3 Through a letter (Ref Number: AB.22aAll2/Ol And Dated 25tn March ^A 20l9l, the Committee wrote to the Ministry of Energr and Mineral Development seeking for information on the status of implementation of W util flc- 6 lw lLa- Government Assurances under the Ministry; and received responses from the Ministry through a letter (Ref Number: ADM I4O|SSO|OL Dated 29ft March 2019) signed by Hon. Eng. Irene Muloni, Minister Of Energr And Mineral Development. The responses of the Minister of Energr and Mineral Development are herewith attached as Annex XII). 4. The Committee also carried out field based activities as follows: a) Carried out on spot inspections or checks of selected projects, on various sites to physically verify the level of implementation of the assurances. b) Interacted directly with the intended beneficiaries in the districts visited; to capture their views on the status of implementation of the assurances in their respective areas. c) Determined the status of implementation of the Assurances, from which it derived its findings and conclusions based on the following as the criteria to make judgments: i) Completeness: Fully implemented/ partially implemented/ not implemented.