arXiv:gr-qc/9912116v1 29 Dec 1999 h ugse htΛcnvr 7.I h e.[]acos- a [8] state ref. of equation the from the In varying with [7]. proposed was vary model can Linde mological Λ to that and [6], suggested particles who virtual of interaction itational rtc itnus he prahs[] ntefis ap- first the In Coop- Λ [4]. and proach approaches Overduin three Λ-variability, distinguish on erstock therein). paper references recent and a [2,3] In (see decades two than more aumsrs-nrytno ihteeuto fstate of equation the with p tensor goes stress-energy Λ materialism, vacuum interpreted dialectic who Gliner to to connected back Cooper- being and content. as matter Overduin the stock by of characterized part approach, as This treated and (1) equations tipsil oitoueacsooia ema variable as term cosmological a introduce to impossible it = Λ implies (8 h rsneo oemte oreohrthan other source matter some of presence the [9]. value Λ positive constant cosmological initial a the neg- of cancelling a scalar density develops unstable gravity, energy by classically ative to applied a coupled first which non-minimally in was field, entity, model third a geometrical The left- in a the Dolgov on nature. as it of side keeping the constant while hand of vary a to side Λ as left-hand allowing it approach, the treat on and Λ Eq.(1) keep to prefers approach ieacsooia emwt 8 = Λ with term cosmological a like o a h form the has sor oain iegneo h isentensor, Einstein the of divergence vanishing covariant guarantee identities Bianchi the since constant, nteasneo atrdsrbdby constant. described cosmological matter the of is absence Λ the and matter, In a of tensor where oia osatΛa yaia quantity. dynamical a as cosmo- Λ the constant observations treating logical with favour compellingly models [1], of cosmology confrontation in the as well as = πG h data ih evral a ensuidfor studied been has variable be might Λ that idea The hnvrvraiiyo spsil,i requires it possible, is Λ of variability Whenever nqatmfil hoy h aumsrs-nryten- stress-energy vacuum the theory, field quantum In h iseneutoswt omlgcltr read term cosmological a with equations Einstein The theory, field quantum and particles in Developments h leri tutr facsooia emi spherical in term cosmological a of structure algebraic The − ) ρ − G 1 5,t e’oihwocnetdΛwt h grav- the with Λ connected who Zel’dovich to [5], µν Λ g µν g steEnti tensor, Einstein the is µν ASnmes 47.w 04.20.Dw 04.70.Bw, numbers: PACS ymti ae h nainr qaino state of equation inflationary The case. symmetric rpsli ae ntePto lsicto ceeadEin and scheme classification Petrov the on based is proposal p r ssitdot h ih-adsd ftefield the of side right-hand the onto shifted is const epooet ecietednmc facsooia emin term cosmological a of dynamics the describe to propose We nttt fMteais nomtc n hsc,Univer Physics, and Informatics Mathematics, of Institute ic h osrainequation conservation the since , dpnetscn aksmerctno Λ tensor symmetric rank second -dependent r Λ p = = G T < µν − − nti ae hsrqieetmakes requirement This case. this in ρ ρ Λ + Λ µν h agnilpressure tangential The . to > g p µν = = ρ < = ρ/ − vac .I otat idealistic contrast, In 3. 8 g T πGT µν µν g > πGρ screpnigto corresponding as stestress-energy the is µν µν vac T µν hc behaves which . utbe must Λ , G p µν ⊥ Λ G ; ν µν scluae rmtecnevto qainΛ equation conservation the from calculated is 0. = T .G Dymnikova G. I. ; ν µν 0 = (1) µν = nain ne ossi h aildrcin This direction. radial the in boosts under invariant 1 nisl.Hwvr ti osbefrasrs-nrytensor stress-energy a Λ for than possible other is it However, itself. in a ewitni h om[11] form the in written be can equations. field Einstein the by classification and Petrov [10] the spherically by scheme the suggested in as be case, can symmetric term cosmological a of structure iseneutosare equations Einstein where rm eoe ieetainwt epc to respect with differentiation denotes prime A ntecs of case the In h ouini h eSte emtywt osatpos- constant with geometry Sitter curvature de itive the is solution the h leri tutr ftesrs-nrytno (6), Λ tensor term cosmological stress-energy a the to of corresponding structure algebraic The esr r lsie ntebsso hi algebraic their of basis the on classified are tensors n h qaino tt is state of equation the and ds nteshrclysmercsai aealn element line a case static symmetric spherically the In algebraic the what show to is letter this of aim The ntePto lsicto cee[0 stress-energy [10] scheme classification Petrov the In p 2 = = − d iyo lzy,1-6 lzy,Poland Olsztyn, 10-561 Olsztyn, of sity − Ω e ti edeutosi h spherically the in equations field stein − ρ 2 1 8 h peial ymti aeb an by case symmetric spherically the ν sstse yterda pressure, radial the by satisfied is 8 πGT ds − steln lmn nteui pee The sphere. unit the on element line the is ( πGT µ T g 2 ′′ Λ µν µν / 3 R = r r r + 2 . 2 t (8 = t Λ h ieeeetis element line The 4Λ. = e = T 8 = µ πGT t dt ( t µ − r e = ′ πG ) 2 e − 2 dt ysmercsolutions symmetric ly − / − ν T θ θ ( + 4 2 ν p ( ) r r ν − ( − 8 = = µ ′ 1 = 1 /r ′ Λ e /r − − µ ν πGT T g − ( ′ ρ µν θ r θ 1 + Λ ν µ − ) 1 ; 3 dr = r µ = /r ν φ 2 φ /r 0. = 2 ′ T ) 2 ρ = − φ / φ 1 + ) 2 − vac 2 1 + ) , 1 r r dr g 2 g − µν d µν 2 /r Ω /r µ is , − 2 2 ′ ν 2 r ′ 2 / d r )(5) 4) . Ω 2 (2) (4) (3) (6) (7) (8) (9) structure. When the elementary divisors of the matrix with ∞ Tµν − λgµν (i.e., the eigenvalues of Tµν ) are real, the M =4π ρ(r)r2dr < ∞ (16) eigenvectors of Tµν are nonisotropic and form a comoving Z0 reference frame. Its timelike vector represents a velocity. The classification of the possible algebraic structures of If we impose the boundary condition of de Sitter be- haviour (7) at r → 0, the form of the mass function stress-energy tensors satisfying the above conditions con- M(r) in the limit of small r must be [13–15] tains five possible types: [IIII],[I(III)], [II(II)], [(II)(II)], 3 3 [(IIII)]. The first symbol denotes the eigenvalue related M(r)=(Λ/6G)r = (4π/3)ρvacr (17) to the timelike eigenvector. Parentheses combine equal For any density profile satisfying conditions (16)-(17), (degenerate) eigenvalues. A comoving reference frame is the metric (14) describes a globally regular de Sitter- defined uniquely if and only if none of the spacelike eigen- Schwarzschild geometry, asymptotically Schwarzschild as values λ (α =1, 2, 3) coincides with a timelike eigenvalue α r → ∞ and asymptotically de Sitter as r → 0 [15,16]. λ . Otherwise there exists an infinite set of comoving ref- 0 The fundamental difference from the Schwarzschild erence frames. case is that there are two horizons, a black hole hori- In this scheme the de Sitter stress-energy tensor (6) is zon r and an internal Cauchy horizon r− [13,14,12]. A represented by [(IIII)] (all eigenvalues being equal) and + critical value of the mass M exists, at which the hori- classified as a vacuum tensor due to the absence of a crit zons come together. This gives a lower limit for the black preferred comoving reference frame. An observer mov- hole mass. ing through the de Sitter vacuum (6) cannot in principle Depending on the value of the mass M, there exist measure his velocity with respect to it, since his comoving three types of configurations in which a Schwarzschild reference frame is also comoving for (6) [5]. singularity is replaced with Λ core [15,16]: 1) A Λ black In the spherically symmetric case it is possible, by hole (ΛBH) for M >M [17]; 2) An extreme ΛBH for the same definition, to introduce an r-dependent vacuum crit M = M ; 3) A ”Λ particle” (ΛP) - a particle-like struc- stress-energy tensor with the algebraic structure [12] crit ture without horizons ”made up” of a self-gravitating φ t r θ spherically symmetric vacuum (10) - for M pr = −ρ; p⊥ = pr + (r/2)(dpr/dr) (11) t − r where ρ = Tt is the density, pr = Tr is the radial pres- − θ − φ sure, and p⊥ = Tθ = Tφ is the tangential pressure. In this case equations (3)-(4) reduce to the equation − ′ 8πGρ = e ν(r)(ν /r − 1/r2)+1/r2 (12) whose solution is M r −ν(r) 2G (r) 2 g00 = e =1 − ; M(r)= ρ(x)x dx r Z0 (13) and the line element is − ds2 = (1−2GM(r)/r)dt2 −(1−2GM(r)/r) 1dr2 −r2dΩ2 (14) If we require the density ρ(r) to vanish as r → ∞ − quicker then r 3, then the metric (14) for large r has FIG. 1. The metric coefficient g00(r) for de Sit- the Schwarzschild form ter-Schwarzschild configurations in the case of the density profile (18). The parameter m is the mass M normalized 1/2 g00(r)=1 − 2GM/r (15) to Mcrit ≃ 0.3MPl(ρPl/ρΛ) . 2 The stress-energy tensor (10) responsible for the ΛBH The conformal diagram shown in Fig.2 represents the and ΛP solutions connects in a smooth way two vacuum global structure of de Sitter-Schwarzschild spacetime in states: de Sitter vacuum (6) at the origin and Minkowski the case of any smooth density profile ρ(r) satisfying vacuum Tµν = 0 at infinity. The vacuum equation of conditions (16)-(17). In the case of discontinuous den- state (9) remains valid for the radial component of a pres- sity profile ρ(r) = ρPlΘ(rm − r) corresponding to di- sure. This makes it possible to treat the stress-energy rect matching of de Sitter to Schwarzschild metric at the tensor (10) as corresponding to an r-dependent cosmo- junction surface r = rm [13,14], the asymptotically flat logical term Λµν , varying from Λµν = Λgµν as r → 0 to regions are connected through a black hole interior to a Λµν = 0 as r → ∞, and satisfying the equation of state baby universe arising inside a black hole [14]. The ques- Λ t Λ − r Λ − θ − φ tion of arising a baby universe inside a black hole in the (11) with ρ =Λt, pr = Λr and p⊥ = Λθ = Λφ. The global structure of de Sitter-Schwarzschild space- case of an arbitrary continuous density profile is consid- time in the case M >Mcrit is shown in Fig.2 [15]. It ered in the ref. [23]. contains an infinite sequence of Λ black holes (BH), Λ The vacuum energy outside a ΛBH horizon is given by white holes (WH), past and future Λ cores (RC), and ∞ asymptotically flat universes (U). A Λ white hole mod- 2 − Λ 3 Evac = ρ(r)r dr = M exp r+ (20) els a non-singular cosmology with inflationary origin fol- Zr+ 6GM lowed by anisotropic Kasner-type expansion due to the One can say that a Λ black hole has Λ hair. anisotropy of the Λ tensor, which in this model is time- The question of the stability of a ΛBH and ΛP is cur- dependent [23]. rently under investigation. Comparison of the ADM mass (16) with the proper mass [18] ∞ − M −1/2 2 r=r WH µ =4π ρ(r)(1 2G (r)/r) r dr (21) − − Z0 makes a suggestion. In the spherically symmetric situ- RC RC 1 2 r=0 r=r r=0 ations the ADM mass represents the total energy, M = − − r=r r=r µ + binding energy [18]. In our case µ is bigger than M. This gives us a hint that the configuration might be r=r BH + + stable since energy is needed to break it up. + J + J If we modify the density profile to allow a non-zero o o i U U i value of cosmological constant λ as r → ∞, putting 2 r=r 1 J − − + + J t r=r r=r Tt (r)= ρ(r)+8πGλ, (22) r=r WH − − we obtain the metric [19] 2 2 2 RC RC ds = (1 − 2GM(r)/r − λr /3)dt − 1 2 r=0 r=r r=0 − − r=r r=r − (1 − 2GM(r)/r − λr2/3) 1dr2 − r2dΩ2 (23) r=r BH + + J + J whose asymptotics are the de Sitter metric (7) with o o → → ∞ i + U U i (Λ + λ) as r 0 and with λ as r . The two-lambda 2 r=r 1 J − − spacetime has in general three horizons: a cosmological + + J r=r r=r horizon r++, a black hole horizon r+ and a Cauchy hori- − r=r WH zon r . Horizons are calculated by solving the equation − − g00(r) = 0 with g00(r) from the Eq.(23). They are plotted in Fig.3 for the case of the density profile given by (18). RC RC 1 2 There are two critical values of the mass M, restricting r=0 r=r r=0 − − the BH mass from below and above. A lower limit Mcr1 r=r r=r corresponds to the first extreme BH state r+ = r− and BH is very close to the lower limit for ΛBH. An upper limit Mcr2 corresponds to the second extreme state r+ = r++ and depends on the parameter q ≡ Λ/λ. p FIG. 2. Penrose-Carter diagram for Λ black hole. 3 The global structure of two-lambda spacetimes for the case Mcr1 40 − WH − r=∞ , Jr=r r= ∞ , J r=r − − horizons − − r=r r=r 30 Mcr2 RC RC RC RC q=25 2 1 2 1 r=0 r=0 r=0 r=r r=r r=0 20 − − − − r=r r=r ∞ , J+ ∞ , J + Mcr2 BHr= BHr= BH r=r CCr=r r=r CC r=r 10 + + 1 + + + 1 + + + + + + + r=r r=r r=r r=r Mcr1 UUUU 0 r=r 1 r=r 2 r=r 1 r=r 2 0 10 20 30 40 + + + + + + + + + + + + r=r CCr=r r=r CC r=r mass 2 2 WH − WH − WH r=∞ , Jr=r r= ∞ , J r=r FIG. 3. Horizon-mass diagram forn a two-lambda space- − − − − time. An upper limit for a BH mass Mcr2 depends on the r=r r=r ≡ 1/2 RC RC RC RC parameter q (Λ/λ) . 2 1 2 1 r=0 r=0 r=0 r=r r=r r=0 − − − − r=r r=r ∞ , J+ ∞ , J + Depending on the mass M, two-lambda geometries r= BH r= represent five types of configurations [20]: 1) A two-lambda black hole (ΛλBH) for Mcr1 M=2 is a time-varying, spatially inhomogeneous component 0.5 M=3.4 of matter content with negative pressure [25]. The M=5 key difference comes from the equation of state. For 0 quintessence the equation of state is p = −αρ with α< 1 r [25]. This corresponds to such a stress-energy tensor Tµν M=7.7 M=9 for which a comoving reference frame is defined uniquely. -0.5 The quintessence represents thus a non-vacuum alterna- tive to a cosmological constant Λ, while the tensor Λµν -1 represents the extension of the algebraic structure of a cosmological term which allows it to be variable. 2 4 6 8 10 FIG. 4. Two-lambda configurations for the case q = 10. Acknowledgement The mass M is normalized to (3/G2Λ)1/2. Two extreme states This work was supported by the Polish Committee for for ΛλBH are Mcr1 ≃ 3.4 and Mcr2 ≃ 7.7. Scientific Research through the Grant 2.P03D.017.11. 4 [1] N. A. Bahcall, J. P. Ostriker, S. Perlmutter, P. J. Stein- hardt, Science 284, 1481 (1999). [2] S. L. Adler, Rev. Mod. Phys. 54, 729 (1982). [3] S. Weinberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 61, 1 (1989). [4] J. M. Overduin and F. I. Cooperstock, Phys. Rev. D58, 043506 (1998). [5] E. B. Gliner, Sov. Phys. JETP 22, 378 (1966). [6] Ya. B. Zel’dovich, Sov. Phys. Lett. 6, 883 (1968). [7] A. D. Linde, Sov. Phys. Lett. 19, 183 (1974). [8] E. B. Gliner, I. G. Dymnikova, Sov. Astr. Lett. 1, 93 (1975). [9] A. D.Dolgov, in The Very Early Universe, Ed. G. W. Gibbons, S. W. Hawking, S. T. C. Siclos (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England 1983), p. 449. [10] A. Z. Petrov, Einstein Spaces, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1969. [11] R. C. Tolman, Relativity, Thermodynamics and Cosmol- ogy, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1969. [12] I. Dymnikova, Gen. Rel. Grav. 24, 235 (1992). [13] E. Poisson and W. Israel, Class. Quant. Grav. 5, L201 (1988). [14] V. P. Frolov, M. A. Markov, and V. F. Mukhanov, Phys. Rev. D41, 3831 (1990). [15] I. G. Dymnikova, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D5, 529 (1996). [16] I. Dymnikova, Gravitation and Cosmology 5, 15 (1999). [17] The idea goes back to Gliner paper [5] where he sug- gested that de Sitter vacuum can be a final state in a gravitational collapse. [18] C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, J. A. Wheeler, Gravitation, Freeman, San Francisco, 1973. [19] I. Dymnikova, B. Soltysek, in Proceedings of the VIII Marcel Grossmann Meeting on General Relativity, Ed. Tsvi Piran, World Scientific, 1997; Gen. Rel. Grav. 30, 1775 (1998). [20] I. Dymnikova, B. Soltysek, in Particles, Fields and Grav- itation, Ed. J. Rembielinsky, 460 (1998). [21] F. Kottler, Encykl. Math. Wiss. 22a, 231 (1922); E. Tr- efftz, Math. Ann. 86, 317 (1922). [22] H. Nariai, Sci. Rep. Tohoku Univ. 35, 62 (1951). [23] A. Dobosz, I. Dymnikova, M. Fil’chenkov, A. Gromov, to be published. [24] A. Dobosz, I. G. Dymnikova, in preparation. [25] R. R. Caldwell, R. Dave, P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80,1582 (1998). 5