Missing Iris Effect As a Possible Cause of Muted Hydrological Change and High Climate Sensitivity in Models Thorsten Mauritsen* and Bjorn Stevens
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
PERSPECTIVE PUBLISHED ONLINE: 20 APRIL 2015 | DOI: 10.1038/NGEO2414 Missing iris effect as a possible cause of muted hydrological change and high climate sensitivity in models Thorsten Mauritsen* and Bjorn Stevens Equilibrium climate sensitivity to a doubling of CO2 falls between 2.0 and 4.6 K in current climate models, and they suggest a weak increase in global mean precipitation. Inferences from the observational record, however, place climate sensitivity near the lower end of this range and indicate that models underestimate some of the changes in the hydrologi cal cycle. These discrepancies raise the possibility that important feedbacks are missing from the models. A controversial hypothesis suggests that the dry and clear regions of the tropical atmosphere expand in a warming climate and thereby allow more infrared radiation to escape to space. This so-called iris effect could constitute a negative feedback that is not included in climate models. We find that inclusion of such an effect in a climate model moves the simulated responses of both temperature and the hydrological cycle to rising atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations closer to observations. Alternative suggestions for shortcomings of models — such as aerosol cooling, volcanic eruptions or insufficient ocean heat uptake — may explain a slow observed transient warming relative to models, but not the observed enhancement of the hydrological cycle. We propose that, if precipitating con vective clouds are more likely to cluster into larger clouds as temperatures rise, this process could constitute a plausible physical mechanism for an iris effect. n the tropics, radiative cooling predominantly occurs in dry and well below that of any climate model and also below the 1.5 K that clear subsiding parts of the atmosphere. The radiative cooling is generally thought to be the lowest possible ECS based on vari- Iis balanced mainly by latent heat released in precipitating deep ous lines of evidence11. But this low ECS-estimate is conditional not convective clouds (Fig. 1). Processes that may change the balance only on the rate of reduction of high-level clouds, but also on cloud in favour of dry and clear regions in warmer climates have been optical properties (Box 1). The cooling implied by the iris effect is proposed to constitute a possible negative feedback not represented strongest if the thinnest clouds diminish. If it is instead primarily by climate models1. This potential feedback has been termed the the thicker anvils that are reduced in a warmer climate, the negative iris effect, in analogy to the enlargement of the eye’s iris as its pupil feedback of the iris effect is weaker12,13. contracts under the influence of more light (Box 1). It is unclear, Detection of an iris effect in observations is not straightforward. however, whether an iris effect can be directly detected in observed Convection preferentially occurs over the warmest surface tempera- variations of tropical cloud1,2, precipitation3–5 or radiation fields6–8 tures, which makes it challenging to interpret natural variations. If that co-vary with sea surface temperature. We approach the ques- an analysis focuses on small regions, it may appear as if upper-level tion differently, and instead investigate whether the presence of an cloud cover increases with temperature, despite an average decrease iris effect would lead to other physical changes that might be more at a larger scale. The observed cloud reductions that accompanied readily observed. We suggest that candidate changes are a possibil- an increase in the surface temperature within convecting regions1 ity of a low-end climate sensitivity despite positive shortwave cloud occurred thousands of kilometres away from the location where feedback, and enhanced precipitation increases with warming to the actual convection occurred2, which raised questions about the balance atmospheric cooling associated with an iris effect. causal relationship between these changes. But depending on the scale at which tropical convection organizes, this clearing in the sur- Past debate on the iris effect roundings can be interpreted as an expansion of the associated dry Observations of natural variations of upper-level cloud cover with and clear regions. underlying sea surface temperatures over the warm-pool region in Patterns of local warming can be associated with circulation the western Pacific led to the conceptual idea of an iris effect. Cloud changes that one would not expect in a warming climate, and cover was found to be reduced by about 22% per degree warming1. unravelling whether changes in cloudiness are the cause or the Although the magnitude of the reduction is somewhat dependent consequence of the circulation changes is not straightforward14. on methodology, the sign is robust9,10. A reduced upper-level cloud cover with warmer surface temperatures could constitute a negative Monthly variations of the tropical energy budget feedback on climate change, because thin and cold high-level ice Alternatively, fluctuations in the top-of-atmosphere radiation bal- clouds have a net warming effect (Box 1). ance that accompany surface temperature fluctuations can be stud- Taking a high-cloud reducing effect of a warming sea surface into ied directly, and constitute a potential feedback14,15. An updated account has led to an estimate of the equilibrium climate sensitivity analysis is focused on the tropics (Fig. 2) because this region is (ECS) — the expected long-term surface warming associated with central to the debate over the iris effect6–8. When temperatures are a doubling of atmospheric CO2 — of only about 1 K (ref. 1). This is anomalously warm, the surface emits more longwave radiation to Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Bundesstrasse 53, 20146 Hamburg, Germany. *e-mail: [email protected] NATURE GEOSCIENCE | ADVANCE ONLINE PUBLICATION | www.nature.com/naturegeoscience 1 © 2015 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved PERSPECTIVE NATURE GEOSCIENCE DOI: 10.1038/NGEO2414 Strong OLRWeak OLR Thus, whereas the discrepancy between the model ensemble and observations is suggestive of missing processes, the analysis of monthly variability in the tropical radiation budget poses at best weak constraints on global ECS. Risingi tropopauseropo u Convective aggregation as a possible mechanism Iriss exexpansionpans One objection to the idea of an iris effect is that it is not clear what Dryy andand clearcl Moist and the physical mechanism might be. An iris effect could result if cloudy the efficiency of precipitation within deep convective cloud tow- ers increased with warming, leading to less detrainment into their anvils5,17. This could occur if aggregation of convective clouds into large clusters is temperature-dependent. Aggregation is due to an instability of radiative-convective equilibrium, whereby relatively dry regions cool radiatively, resulting in local subsidence and fur- ther suppression of convection, ultimately leading to an aggregated state with localized convective clusters18. The cooling of the dry tent heating Radiative cooling Radiative La and clear regions is expected to increase with warmer temperatures and hence promote aggregation19. In addition, in a warmer climate convective clouds may further be invigorated by enhanced latent heat release20. As larger convective clouds dilute less by lateral mixing they pre- cipitate more of their water during ascent, and fewer large clusters can provide the necessary latent heating to sustain atmospheric radi- Figure 1 | Illustration of the tropical atmospheric circulation. ative cooling (Fig. 1). Both cloud-resolving simulations21 and obser- vations22 confirm that outgoing longwave radiation does increase as cool off. But the strength of the net temperature restoration depends a consequence of a drying environment in more aggregated states. on atmospheric feedback mechanisms. In the case of open domains Shortwave absorption also increases, which tends to cancel some of such as the one analysed here, lateral fluxes of energy out of the the effect. All in all, however, we conclude that it is plausible that con- domain can change. vective aggregation constitutes a negative longwave feedback on cli- Satellite data from the Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy mate change — and to our understanding, the underlying processes System (CERES) instruments show a strong negative longwave are not explicitly represented in climate models. regression close to the Planck feedback in the tropics16, and a In principle, the problem of convective aggregation lends itself to weak positive shortwave regression to yield a net regression of fine-scale simulations that explicitly resolve the dynamics of indi- −3.2 ± 1.0 W m−2 K-1 (Fig. 2, Supplementary Table 2). The ensemble vidual convective clouds. In small-domain simulations, however, mean of the climate models of the fifth phase of the Coupled Model whether or not convection will aggregate depends critically on reso- Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) matches the observed relation- lution, domain-size and initial conditions23. This complicates the ship between temperature and net shortwave radiation, albeit with interpretation of possible temperature dependencies. Pioneering considerable scatter, but systematically exhibits a longwave regres- work to simulate convective clouds at the global scale has suggested sion that is too weak (Fig. 2b, Supplementary Table 3). Analysis a somewhat puzzling combined upper-level reduction in cloud ice of irradiances