Three Freedoms Under the Magnifying Glass

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Three Freedoms Under the Magnifying Glass Three freedoms under the magnifying glass Review of violations of freedom of association, assembly and expression in Serbia from March to July 2019 Association. Assembly. Expression. These three freedoms must be guaranteed to all. These three freedoms form the basis of civil society. No country can call itself democratic without guaranteeing these rights. These freedoms are guaranteed by the Constitution and laws of the Republic of Serbia. Practice, however, shows the opposite. We are witnessing more and more frequent attacks on associations, activists and the free media. The space in which they operate is increasingly narrowed as the number of attacks, threats, intimidation and insults increases. We believe that regularly collecting and publishing cases of violation of these rights can help to raise the visibility of this trend that is growing rapidly and draw attention to the seriousness of the problems we face. Here is an overview of key violations of freedom of assembly, association and expression in Serbia since March this year, when Serbia was placed on the CIVICUS Monitor Watch List as a country where these freedoms are seriously threatened. We will continue to publish these overviews in the future, which show instances of violations of the freedoms of association, assembly and expression. In addition, representatives of 20 civil society organisations signed in Belgrade the Three Freedoms Platform for the Protection of Civic Space in the Republic of Serbia, in order to protect and promote the freedom of association, assembly and information.The Platform is intended to act as a joint block of civil society organizations (associations, professional organizations, foundations, endowments, and other forms of associations including informal groups of citizens) to stand for the protection of endangered freedoms and create conditions for unhindered participation of citizens in public affairs through civil society development. We are aware that the fight to preserve these rights is a long and difficult one. We are aware that these overviews will not force those who violate the rights to cease or cause an adequate response from the international community. These representations are a support to civil society, and for media, decision- makers and citizens they present a reliable and up-to-date account of the reality of civic space in Serbia. Regular monitoring allows for stronger and more coordinated action by all actors to protect these three freedoms and impede the work of those who wish to suppress them. * Civic Initiatives as a partner of CIVICUS Monitor for Serbia send bi-weekly reports in English since August 2018. Learn more about the CIVICUS Monitor here. * ENGLISH SOURCES WERE PROVIDED WHERE POSSIBLE Freedom of association March 10 – 18, 2019 1. Milan Blagojevic, one of the organizers of the "1 in 5 million" civic protests in Zitoradja, was attacked and beaten. He accused the Mayor Ivan Stanojevic for this violence, in whose office Blagojevic was when five men entered the room and started kicking him in the head. The mayor dismissed the allegations, saying he was the one who got the beating. Multiple head injuries were reported in Blagojevic's medical report. Milan Blagojevic and two other protest organizers, who were interviewed by the police together, were detained for 48 hours. 2. Organizers of the protest "1 of 5 million" in Negotin, announced that Strahinja Ciric, also one of the organizers, was attacked and beaten in front of the building where he lives, where he suffered serious physical injuries. In the week prior to this attack, Ćirić spoke at the protest about Zoran Milojevic Zelja as "the SNS's chief thug", as the master of Negotin, which the protest organizers consider to be the motive for this attack. March 18 - April 23, 2019 3. The Director of the Lawyer's Committee for Human Rights - YUCOM received a written message from the Belgrade Bar Association warning her that she was not entitled to be a director of an NGO because it was not in line with her function as a lawyer. The legal framework is unclear in this respect, so it can be interpreted in several ways, which the Belgrade Bar Association is misusing. The Lawyer's Committee for Human Rights provides free legal assistance, and the Bar is constantly threatening the work of providing legal assistance, seeking a monopoly on this service. 4. It has been noted that sites registered by unknown entities actively resemble other investigative sites by name and design. Articles published by websites such as the Istraga and the Patriot contain information that discredits NGOs. The Center for Research, Transparency and Accountability - CRTA, which deals with transparency and free elections, has been their latest target. One article states that the CRTA is influenced by foreign governments and that it is working against Serbia's interests. Also, articles of the same content can be found on similar websites and show a systematic approach to this smear campaign. 5. The Association of Public Prosecutors of Serbia (UTS) is facing pressures aimed at discrediting the efforts of this association which is working on preservation of the autonomy and independence of public prosecutors in the judicial system in the process of amending the Constitution. Pro-regime tabloids are publishing numerous articles on the participation of individual UTS members in the work of the State Prosecutorial Council, describing them as traitors and mafia members. A much more serious attack on UTS is the formation of a new professional association, the Association of Judges and Prosecutors by existing professional associations, as well as representatives of the civil sector, which is characterized as GONGO. April 23 - May 7, 2019 6. Following the appearance of Sonja Stojanovic Gajic, director of the Belgrade Center for Security Policy, on a television show stating that the announcement of the hunger strike by Defense Minister Aleksandr Vulin is just another reality show, aimed at distracting citizens from thinking about current issues, a GONGO called National Avant-garde published a video criticizing the work of the BCSP, and its director personally. The BCSP has been targeted lately because of their reports in which they are describing Serbia as a captured state and also calling for introduction of the Pribe mechanism in Serbia as an aid in fighting the capture state. The captured state implies a state of widespread corruption, which allows public resources to be used for private purposes, while control mechanisms are neutralized, either by legal or illegal channels. This situation extends to sectors covered, to a varying extent, in certain negotiating chapters, but also to the political criteria whose fulfillment is more difficult to follow. European Commission ordered independent expert report about the state of rule of law in Macedonia. BCSP stated that if the EC would send experts to Serbia to make a similar report it would make a difference in the rule of law in Serbia. After those claims, GONGOs and pro-government media started targeting BCSP even more. 7. On the other hand, GONGOs close to the security sector are working to promote nationalist and right- wing groups. The Center for Security, Investigation and Defense recently suggested that it would be wise to establish civilian patrols to combat juvenile delinquency and drug traffickers who use children to smuggle narcotics. The role of this association is to promote the security sector and to magnify its closedness and lack of transparency under the veil of patriotism. The founders of this association are suspicious individuals with a criminal background. 8. Another right-wing organization has launched an online petition to introduce a new law on non- governmental organizations in Serbia, similar to the one in Russia, to control foreign funds. Civic initiatives have publicly asked the Change.org online platform to remove the petition because it violates international law, domestic laws and promotes hate speech. 9. A meeting of the Working Group for Amendments to the Criminal Code was held in order to review the sanctions for the most serious crimes. It was announced that the unique position of the working group is that the court should be able to impose a life sentence without the possibility of parole. Civil society distanced itself from this position and announced that the article which says "without the possibility of conditional release" was not considered in the working group. The change of the Criminal Code appeared as a populist move by the authorities after several years of petitioning of the father of a murdered girl to impose life sentences to the killers of children. May 7 - June 4, 2019 10. The reactions of representatives of the GONGO organization Transparency - Council for Monitoring, Human Rights and the Fight against Corruption on the European Commission’s report about Serbia's EU progress were published in the tabloid Informer. They say the report was written by political opponents of Aleksandar Vucic, Serbian Progressive Party and members of the coalition gathered around the parliamentary majority, which is a blow to the credibility of EU institution. The GONGO organization National Avant-garde continued with its activities and released a new video against liberal civil society, that reflects warnings from independent civil society organizations that warn of the growing trend of the emergence of new GONGO organizations in Serbia. These events indicate the increased activity of GONGO organizations in Serbia 11. Youth of the Democratic Party of Serbia, the opposition right wing parliamentary party, held a performance the day before the Miredita, dobar dan! festival and sought its ban. They also asked the Serbian authorities to ban the work of the Youth Initiative for Human Rights, which is the organizer of the festival. 12. The Government of the Republic of Serbia held a meeting with non-governmental organizations on amendments to the Law on Financial Support to Families with Children, to which the association “Moms are the Law” was not originally called, which was most critical of the law.
Recommended publications
  • [email protected], [email protected] Www
    PERSONAL INFORMATION Name MARKO STOJANOVIĆ Address Telephone Mobil Fax E-mail [email protected], [email protected] Web www.worldmime.org and www.curling.rs Nationality Serbian Date of birth 2ND of January 1971. WORK EXPERIENCE • Dates (from – to) From 2013 to date • Name and address of employer BELGRADE YOUTH CENTRE “DOM OMLADINE BEOGRADA”, Makedonska 22, 11000 Belgrade, Telephone: + 381 (0) 11 322 01 27, www.domomladine.org; [email protected] • Type of business or sector Belgrade Youth Centre is a cultural institution of the City of Belgrade • Occupation or position held Acting GENERAL MANAGER and Director of the Belgrade Jazz Festival • Main activities and responsibilities Organising work process and managing employees as well as artists and finances. Development and improvement of programs, work processes and financial situation. Developing relationships with Belgrade, Serbian and international youth as primary audience, but with city and state governments, core diplomatique, ngo's, youth, educational and artistic institutions, formal and informal groups and individuals. Produceing the Belgrade Jazz Festival since 1971. • Dates (from – to) From 2013 and 2014 • Name and address of employer SINGIDUNUM UNIVERSITY, Danijelova 32, 11000 Belgrade, Telephone: + 381 (0) 11 3093 220, www.singidunum.ac.rs ; [email protected] • Type of business or sector Management and Communication • Occupation or position held LECTURER AND PR CONSULTANT • Main activities and responsibilities Teaching Communication Skills and Public
    [Show full text]
  • Special Editions 133
    MILAN St. PROTIĆ BETWEEN DEMOCRACY AND POPULISM POLITICAL IDEAS OF THE PEOPLE’S RADICAL PARTY IN SERBIA (The Formative Period: 1860’s to 1903) BETWEEN AND POPULISM DEMOCRACY , Protić . t M. S ISBN 978-86-7179-094-9 BELGRADE 2015 http://www.balkaninstitut.com MILAN St. PROTIĆ BETWEEN DEMOCRACY AND POPULISM POLITICAL IDEAS OF THE PEOPLE’S RADICAL PARTY IN SERBIA (The Formative Period: 1860’s to 1903) http://www.balkaninstitut.com INSTITUTE FOR BALKAN STUDIES SERBIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES AND ARTS SPECIAL EDITIONS 133 MILAN St. PROTIĆ BETWEEN DEMOCRACY AND POPULISM POLITICAL IDEAS OF THE PEOPLE’S RADICAL PARTY IN SERBIA (The Formative Period: 1860’s to 1903) Editor-in-Chief Dušan T. Bataković Director of the Institute for Balkan Studies BELGRADE 2015 http://www.balkaninstitut.com Publisher Institute for Balkan Studies Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts Belgrade, Knez Mihailova 35/IV Serbia www.balkaninstitut.com e-mail: [email protected] Reviewers Vojislav Stanovčić, member of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts Vojislav Pavlović, Institute for Balkan Studies, Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts Written in English by Author Design by Kranislav Vranić Printed by SVEN, Niš ISBN 978-86-7179-094-9 http://www.balkaninstitut.com Table of Contents Preface . 7 Prologue . 11 Chapter One THE ORIGINS . 17 Chapter Two THE HISTORY . 35 Chapter Three THE SOURCES . 61 Chapter Four THE CHARACTERISTICS . 83 Chapter Five THE STRUCTURE . 103 Chapter Six THE LEADERS . 121 EPILOGUE . 149 Bibliography. 173 Index . 185 http://www.balkaninstitut.com http://www.balkaninstitut.com PREFACE hen, upon my return from Bern, Switzerland, it was suggested to me Wto consider the publication of my Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Arts in Belgrade
    UNIVERSITY OF ARTS IN BELGRADE UNIVERSITÉ LYON 2 Interdisciplinary Postgraduate Studies UNESCO chair for Cultural Management and Cultural Policy in the Balkans Master thesis: IDENTIFYING AND CREATING THE IDENTITY OF BELGRADE By: Bojana Bursać Supervisor: Prof. Divna Vuksanović, PhD Belgrade, July 2006 Acknowledgement Without help, support, and encouragement from several persons, I would never have been able to finish this work. It is a pleasure that I have now the opportunity to express my gratitude for those that helped me. Foremost, I would like to express my deep and sincere gratitude to my supervisor Professor Divna Vuksanović, Ph.D. for her help, support and constant encouragement during planning and accomplishment of the research and the thesis writing. I wish to express my thanks to Professor Milena Dragićević- Šešić, Ph.D. and Professor Vesna Đukić-Dojčinović who gave me valuable help during my work. In addition, special thanks to the French Cultural Centre for giving me the opportunity to experience the manifestation European capital of culture- Lille 2004, during my internship in Conseil régional Nord-Pas-de-Calais, where I have developed my initial idea for the thesis. I am very grateful to all my interviewees and interviewers who have devoted their time and effort for this research. Last, but not least, I thank my family, boyfriend and friends for their never ending understanding, patience and support. 2 Abstract The present time, popularly known as the “century of city”, demands a detailed definition of a city’s identity and promotion of its brand in order to provide differentiation from other similarly defined places, as well as to defend its own identity from the possible negative effects of branding.
    [Show full text]
  • Yugoslav-Czechoslovak Economic Relations Between 1918 and 1938 Year
    Masaryk University Faculty of Arts Department of History Milan Balaban Yugoslav-Czechoslovak Economic Relations between 1918 and 1938 year PhD thesis Supervisor: Doc. PhDr. Vladimír Goněc, DrSc Brno 2016 1 I declare that this thesis is a product of my own work in its entiretyand uses the sources and literature in the bibliography. Mgr. et. Mgr. Milan Balaban 2 I would like to thank my adviser, Doc. PhDr. Vladimír Goněc DrSc, for his valuable advice during the research and writing of this thesis. Similarly, I would like to thank other historians who provided me with assistance and advice in my exploration of the issue of Yugoslav-Czechoslovak relations. I would also like to thank all the employees in the Archive of Yugoslavia in Belgrade, Archive of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Prague, National Archive in Prague and Archive of the Czech National Bank in Prague. Without their selfless and professional support, the research for this thesis would not have been possible. In the end, I would like to thank my wife and family for their support and unlimited patience. 3 Content Introduction…………………………………………………………………………….....6 1. Historical background and general economic history…………………………….18 1.1. The creation of Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia after the First World War and the Little Entante……………………………………………………………………...18 1.2. The economic history of the Central and Southeast Europe in the Interwar period in a wider European context…………………………………………………………………………….22 2. Economic relations and adaption to the new circumstances in the time of instability (1918-1924)……………………………………………………………….32 2.1. Adaptation to the new circumstances after the First World War………………...32 2.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Publication
    Not for citation without the author’s permission NUMBER 66 THE THIRD YUGOSLAVIA, 1992 - 2001 Sabrina P. Ramet July 2001 EAST EUROPEAN STUDIES This essay is one of a series of Occasional Papers published by East European Studies at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in Washington, DC. The series aims to extend the work of East European scholars and specialists to all those interested in the region and to help authors obtain constructive criticism of work in progress. Occasional Papers are written by resident scholars at the Wilson Center as well as by visiting speakers. They are papers presented at or resulting from discussions, seminars, colloquia, and conferences held under the auspices of East European Studies. The most current Occasional Papers as well as a list of Occasional Papers are available on the EES web site: http://www.wilsoncenter.org/ees. Printed copies of papers may also be obtained free of charge by contacting the EES offices: East European Studies The Woodrow Wilson Center One Woodrow Wilson Plaza 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004-3027 (tel) 202-691-4000; (fax) 202-691-4001 [email protected] Established in 1985 as the East European Program at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, EES provides a center in Washington, DC, where advanced research on Eastern Europe could be pursued by qualified scholars; where encouragement and support could be given to the cultivation of East European studies throughout the country; and where contact could be maintained with similar institutions abroad. Renamed East European Studies in 1989, it also seeks to provide a meeting place for East European scholars, government officials, analysts, and other specialists and practitioners in the field and related areas.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Human Rights Report: Serbia Page 1 of 32
    2009 Human Rights Report: Serbia Page 1 of 32 Home » Under Secretary for Democracy and Global Affairs » Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor » Releases » Human Rights Reports » 2009 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices » Europe and Eurasia » Serbia 2009 Human Rights Report: Serbia BUREAU OF DEMOCRACY, HUMAN RIGHTS, AND LABOR 2009 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices March 11, 2010 The Republic of Serbia is a parliamentary democracy with approximately 7.5 million inhabitants. Boris Tadic was reelected president in February 2008. In May 2008 voters elected a new parliament in which some minority ethnic parties won seats. Observers considered both elections to be mostly in line with international standards. Civilian authorities generally maintained effective control of the security forces. The following human rights problems were reported: physical mistreatment of detainees by police; police corruption; inefficient and lengthy trials; harassment of journalists, human rights advocates, and others critical of the government; limitations on freedom of speech and religion; large numbers of internally displaced persons (IDPs); corruption in legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government; government failure to apprehend the two remaining fugitive war crimes suspects under indictment of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY); societal violence against women and children; societal intolerance and discrimination against minorities, particularly Roma and the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) population; and trafficking in persons. RESPECT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS Section 1 Respect for the Integrity of the Person, Including Freedom From: a. Arbitrary or Unlawful Deprivation of Life The government or its agents did not commit any politically motivated killings. On November 13, the Belgrade District Court convicted Miljan Raicevic, a Belgrade police officer, for the March 19 killing of Djordje Zaric during a traffic stop.
    [Show full text]
  • Session Report
    31st SESSION Strasbourg, 19-21 October 2016 CG31(2016)21 19 October 2016 Information report on the observation of local and provincial elections in Serbia (24 April 2016) Monitoring Committee Rapporteur1: Karim VAN OVERMEIRE, Belgium (R, NR) Summary Further to an invitation by the Republic Electoral Commission of Serbia, the Congress’ Bureau decided to deploy a limited Electoral Assessment Mission in order to monitor the local and provincial elections organised on 24 April 2016. The early Parliamentary elections held on the same day in Serbia were observed by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. The present information report reflects the key findings of the 12-member delegation based on in- depth briefings in Belgrade and Novi Sad prior to the E-Day and on observations made by six Congress teams in more than 120 polling stations throughout the country, with a special attention to the organisation of the regional elections in the Autonomous Province of Vojvodina and the vote organised for the Municipal Councils. Apart from isolated irregularities, the elections were carried out in a calm and orderly manner, largely in line with European electoral standards. However, the Congress’ delegation found that there was room for improvement of the practical side of the elections, notably regarding the protection of the secrecy of the vote and the level of professionalism of the electoral administration. In particular, the extended composition of polling boards led to difficulties in managing different aspects of the electoral process including the vote count. At the same time, the Congress supports a genuine reform in order to complement the legal framework of elections focusing on issues such as party and campaign financing, misuse of administrative resources, the quality of the voters’ lists, candidates’ registration and the minority status of political parties.
    [Show full text]
  • EAS     European Academy of Science Vienna, 1190 Wien, Geweygasse 4A, E-Mail: [email protected], Easvienna.At
    National Theatre, Belgrade EAS European Academy of Science Vienna, 1190 Wien, Geweygasse 4A, E-mail: [email protected], easvienna.at PLENARY SESSION Hotel Imperial, Vienna, Austria 3 Univ. Prof. Dr. Milija Zečević Professor Emeritus Academician, European Academy of Science, Vienna Rector of European University - Chairman Professor Dr. Milija Zečević was born in Vasojevići, the village of Vinicka, Montenegro, on Nov. 5, 1940. He graduated from the Belgrade University Faculty of Sciences – Department of Mathematics; he achieved his Master of Science degree from the Belgrade Institute of Economic Sciences; and Doctoral degree from the Belgrade University Faculty of Organizational Sciences. Professor Zečević has organized numerous symposia and scientific gatherings covering the following topics: European Business and Management, American Business and Management, Japanese Business and Management, International Management, International Relations, International Diplomacy, European Integration Processes, Creating New Europe… Prof. Dr. Zečević is the author of more than 200 papers, published in foreign and domestic collection of scientific papers and publications; he has also authored 39 course books in the field of Management, International Management, Mathematics, International Business, International Relationships, European Business, etc. Rector, Owner and Founder of European University, Belgrade; Commander of World Order of Science - Education - Culture, EAI, Brussels; Grand PhD of Western Philosophy, European Academy of Informatization;
    [Show full text]
  • Defamation As a “Weapon” in Europe and in Serbia: Legal and Self- Regulatory Frameworks
    DEFAMATION AS A “WEAPON” IN EUROPE AND IN SERBIA: LEGAL AND SELF- REGULATORY FRAMEWORKS Jelena Surculija Milojevic* This article examines the legal framework for defamation in Europe and in the Republic of Serbia. It offers a possible definition of the term “weaponized defamation.” In the first part, regional organizations, such as the Council of Europe and European Union, are analyzed to identify their legal framework for defamation. This Article focuses on the legal system of the Republic of Serbia, examined from two points of view - that of media legislation and that of the Journalist’s Code of Ethics, as a self-regulatory framework. The following section of the article focuses on the decriminalization of defamation in Europe at the end of the 20th and beginning of the 21st century. The paper shows that there are countries where defamation is not a criminal offence anymore, while in some countries defamation still poses a criminal threat to journalists. The case law of Serbia at the European Court of Human Rights relevant for defamatory statements (Article 10 (2)) and its positions on them are looked at next, after decisions were made by the European Court of Human Rights. This article will illustrate the misunderstanding of the term “defamation” and the frequent lack of understanding of the differing levels of protection for the honor and reputation of a “public figure” in comparison to that of an individual. The final part of the research focuses on several case studies that may fall into the “weaponized defamation” category as well as the consequences such offenses could have on its victims.
    [Show full text]
  • Yugoslav-Czechoslovak Economic Relations Between 1918 and 1938 Year
    Masaryk University Faculty of Arts Department of History Milan Balaban Yugoslav-Czechoslovak Economic Relations between 1918 and 1938 year PhD thesis Supervisor: Doc. PhDr. Vladimír Goněc, DrSc Brno 2016 1 I declare that this thesis is a product of my own work in its entiretyand uses the sources and literature in the bibliography. Mgr. et. Mgr. Milan Balaban 2 I would like to thank my adviser, Doc. PhDr. Vladimír Goněc DrSc, for his valuable advice during the research and writing of this thesis. Similarly, I would like to thank other historians who provided me with assistance and advice in my exploration of the issue of Yugoslav-Czechoslovak relations. I would also like to thank all the employees in the Archive of Yugoslavia in Belgrade, Archive of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Prague, National Archive in Prague and Archive of the Czech National Bank in Prague. Without their selfless and professional support, the research for this thesis would not have been possible. In the end, I would like to thank my wife and family for their support and unlimited patience. 3 Content Introduction…………………………………………………………………………….....6 1. Historical background and general economic history…………………………….18 1.1. The creation of Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia after the First World War and the Little Entante……………………………………………………………………...18 1.2. The economic history of the Central and Southeast Europe in the Interwar period in a wider European context…………………………………………………………………………….22 2. Economic relations and adaption to the new circumstances in the time of instability (1918-1924)……………………………………………………………….32 2.1. Adaptation to the new circumstances after the First World War………………...32 2.2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Defence and Last Days
    NEDELJNE ANALIZE I PROGNOZE THE DEFENCE AND LAST DAYS Conflict at the head of the Democratic Party ( DS ) between the President of the party Boris Tadi ć and his deputy and popular Mayor of Belgrade Dragan Djilas has lasted since this party lost the elections held in May this year. The conflict escalated during the last week by the exchange of public accusations between the two leading people of the party. Thus was revealed the fact that between Boris Tadi ć and Djilas does not exist any communication and that they have completely different visions of the party’s future. The experts in knowing the situation in the Democratic Party reveal that problems between the leading people in the Democratic Party have started a few years earlier, since the moment when Djilas as the Mayor of Belgrade according to the research of the public opinion has become more popular than Tadi ć who was at the time the President of Serbia. That is exactly why, during the pre-electoral campaign for the May elections, it was more important to Tadi ć that Djilas and the list of the Democratic Party for the Assembly of the city of Belgrade did not gain even one more vote than he would gain as the candidate for the President of the Republic than how many votes he was going to gain in total?! And when it becomes more important where the votes are gained instead of thinking of the fact that every vote enables general success of the party and its candidates – the consequence is the defeat.
    [Show full text]
  • The Milosevic Regime Versus Serbian Democracy and Balkan Stability
    THE MILOSEVIC REGIME VERSUS SERBIAN DEMOCRACY AND BALKAN STABILITY HEARING BEFORE THE COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE ONE HUNDRED FIFTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION DECEMBER 10, 1998 Printed for the use of the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe [CSCE 105-2-?] Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.csce.gov COMMISSION ON SECURITY AND COOPERATION IN EUROPE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS HOUSE SENATE CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey ALFONSE M. DAMATO, New York, Chairman Chairman JOHN EDWARD PORTER, Illinois BEN NIGHTHORSE CAMPBELL, Colorado FRANK R. WOLF, Virginia SPENCER ABRAHAM, Michigan MATT SALMON,Arizona CONRAD BURNS, Montana JON CHRISTENSEN, Nebraska OLYMPIA SNOWE, Maine STENY H. HOYER, Maryland FRANK R. LAUTENBERG, New Jersey EDWARD J. MARKEY, Massachusetts HARRY REID, Nevada BENJAMIN L. CARDIN, Maryland BOB GRAHAM, Florida LOUISE McINTOSH SLAUGHTER, New York RUSSELL D. FEINGOLD, Wisconsin EXECUTIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS JOHN H.F. SHATTUCK, Department of State VACANT, Department of Defense VACANT, Department of Commerce COMMISSION S TAFF MIKE HATHAWAY, Chief of Staff DOROTHY DOUGLAS TAFT, Deputy Chief of Staff ELIZABETH CAMPBELL, Receptionist/System Administrator MARIA V. COLL, Office Administrator OREST DEYCHAKIWSKY, Staff Advisor JOHN FINERTY, Staff Advisor CHADWICK R. GORE, Communications Director, Digest Editor ROBERT HAND, Staff Advisor JANICE HELWIG, Staff Advisor MARLENE KAUFMANN, Counsel for International Trade SANDY LIST, GPO Liaison KAREN S. LORD,Counsel for Freedom of Religion RONALD MCNAMARA, Staff Advisor MICHAEL OCHS, Staff Advisor ERIKA B. SCHLAGER, Counsel for International Law MAUREEN WALSH, Congressional Fellow for Property Restitution Issues (ii) THE MILOSEVIC REGIME VERSUS SERBIAN DEMOCRACY AND BALKAN STABILITY DECEMBER 10, 1998 OPENING STATEMENTS PAGE Opening Statement of Co-Chairman Christopher H.
    [Show full text]