DOCSLIB.ORG

Aquifers of West Texas: Texas Water Development Board, Report 373, 103 P

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aquifers of West Texas: Texas Water Development Board, Report 373, 103 P Texas Water Development Board Report Pecos Valley Aquifer, West Texas: Structure and Brackish Groundwater by John E. Meyer, P.G. Matthew R. Wise, P.G. Sanjeev Kalaswad, Ph.D., P.G. September 6, 2011 Texas Water Development Board Edward G. Vaughan Chairman, Boerne Joe M. Crutcher Vice Chairman, Palestine Thomas Weir Labatt III Member, San Antonio Lewis H. McMahan Member, Dallas Billy R. Bradford, Jr. Member, Brownsville Monte Cluck Member, Gruver Melanie Callahan Interim Executive Administrator The Texas Water Development Board freely grants permission to copy and distribute its materials. The agency would appreciate acknowledgment. Published and distributed by the Texas Water Development Board P.O. Box 13231, Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711-3231 September 6, 2011 (Printed on recycled paper) iii This page is intentionally blank. iv Table of Contents 1. Executive summary .................................................................................................................... 1 2. Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 3 3. Study Area .................................................................................................................................. 5 3.1 Location, topography, and climate .................................................................................. 5 3.2 Geologic history .............................................................................................................. 8 3.2.1 Paleozoic Era ............................................................................................................. 9 3.2.2 Mesozoic Era ........................................................................................................... 10 3.2.3 Cenozoic Era ............................................................................................................ 10 3.3 Summary of water demands and supplies in the study area ......................................... 11 4. Previous Investigations ............................................................................................................. 12 5. Data Collection and Analysis ................................................................................................... 13 5.1 Data sources and processing ......................................................................................... 13 5.1.1 Well identification numbers ..................................................................................... 15 5.1.2 Water well reports .................................................................................................... 15 5.1.3 Geophysical well logs .............................................................................................. 17 5.1.4 Water quality data .................................................................................................... 18 5.1.5 Static water level data .............................................................................................. 19 5.1.6 Hydraulic properties................................................................................................. 19 5.2 Availability of project data to customers ...................................................................... 21 6. Hydrogeologic Setting .............................................................................................................. 21 6.1 Hydrostratigraphy ......................................................................................................... 21 6.1.1 Stratigraphic unit interpretation ............................................................................... 21 6.1.2 Lithologic descriptions............................................................................................. 32 6.1.3 Net sand and sand percent maps .............................................................................. 33 6.1.4 Structural geometry .................................................................................................. 36 6.2 Aquifer determination analysis ..................................................................................... 47 6.3 Water levels, saturated thickness .................................................................................. 48 6.4 Water quality ................................................................................................................. 51 6.4.1 Aquifers.................................................................................................................... 51 6.4.2 Parameters of concern for desalination .................................................................... 51 6.4.3 Brackish water volume estimates............................................................................. 57 6.4.4 Sources of salinity .................................................................................................... 61 7. Resistivity analysis of geophysical well logs ........................................................................... 62 7.1 Interpretive techniques .................................................................................................. 64 7.1.1 BRACS well 1376.................................................................................................... 65 7.1.2 BRACS well 994...................................................................................................... 65 7.2 Results ........................................................................................................................... 68 8. Database description ................................................................................................................. 69 8.1 Table relationships ........................................................................................................ 70 8.1.1 Well Locations ......................................................................................................... 70 8.1.2 Foreign Keys ............................................................................................................ 71 8.1.3 Digital Well Reports ................................................................................................ 71 8.1.4 Geophysical Well Logs ............................................................................................ 72 8.1.5 Well Geology ........................................................................................................... 72 v 8.1.6 Well construction ..................................................................................................... 72 8.1.7 Water Quality ........................................................................................................... 72 8.1.8 Static Water Level.................................................................................................... 73 8.1.9 Aquifer Hydraulic Properties ................................................................................... 73 8.1.10 Aquifer Determination ............................................................................................. 73 8.2 Supporting data sets ...................................................................................................... 73 8.2.1 GIS data set development ........................................................................................ 73 8.2.2 Processes to create data sets ..................................................................................... 73 8.2.3 Map projection parameters ...................................................................................... 75 9. Future improvements ................................................................................................................ 75 10. Conclusions ....................................................................................................................... 76 11. Acknowledgments............................................................................................................. 76 12. References ......................................................................................................................... 77 13. Appendices ........................................................................................................................ 82 13.1 GIS Data Sets ................................................................................................................ 82 List of Figures Figure 2-1. Study area in Trans-Pecos West Texas. ................................................................ 4 Figure 3-1. Oil and gas activity in the project area.. ................................................................ 6 Figure 3-2. Regional water planning areas in the study area. .................................................. 7 Figure 3-3. Groundwater management areas in the study area. ............................................... 8 Figure 3-4. Groundwater conservation district in the study area. ............................................ 9 Figure 3-5. Regional geologic elements of the Trans-Pecos of West Texas.. ....................... 11 Figure 5-1. BRACS project well control. .............................................................................. 14 Figure 5-2. Wells with aquifer test information. .................................................................... 20 Figure 6-1. BRACS aquifer regions in the project area. ........................................................ 22 Figure 6-2. Location of stratigraphic cross-sections
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Los Medaños Member of the Permian (Ochoan) Rustler Formation
    The Los Medaños Member of the Permian (Ochoan) Rustler Formation by Dennis W. Powers, HC 12 Box 87, Anthony, TX 79821; and Robert M. Holt, Dept. of Earth and Environmental Science, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801 Abstract We propose Los Medaños Member as the formal name for the lower part of the Upper Permian (Ochoan) Rustler Formation, below R31E the Culebra Dolomite Member, in the north- ern Delaware Basin. The stratotype is at the exhaust shaft of the Waste Isolation Pilot Exhaust Plant (WIPP) site in sec 20 T22S R31E, Eddy shaft T22S County, New Mexico. The name is derived from the nearby sand dune field (Los Meda- ños) and the quadrangle map of the same WIPP site name. Cores of the Los Medaños from WIPP studies correspond to the exhaust-shaft Los Medanos~ geology, though larger features revealed in T23S the shaft must be inferred. Geophysical log signatures permit regional correlations and interpretation of lithology. Outcrops of this Midland unit are poorly exposed and have been little Basin studied. Recent radiometric ages from cor- Hobbs relative units in the Texas panhandle sug- San Simon Study gest that the top of the Rustler is near the area Permian–Triassic boundary. Carlsbad The stratotype consists of 34.4 m of silici- WIPP Central Basin clastics, halitic mudstones, muddy halite, Nash Draw and sulfates (mainly anhydrite). Bedding, Platform invertebrate fossil remains, and bioturba- New Mexico Midland tion indicate a saline lagoon with connec- Texas tions to open marine water, in contrast to the Odessa shallow-water, desiccating evaporite cycles of the underlying Salado Formation.
    [Show full text]
  • High-Resolution U-Pb Geochronology of Terrestrial Cretaceous-Paleogene and Permo-Triassic Boundary Sequences in North America
    High-resolution U-Pb Geochronology of Terrestrial Cretaceous-Paleogene and Permo-Triassic Boundary Sequences in North America by William Stuart Mitchell, III A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Chemistry in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Paul Renne, Co-chair Professor Evan Williams, Co-chair Professor Heino Nitsche Professor Donald DePaolo Spring 2014 High-resolution U-Pb Geochronology of Terrestrial Cretaceous-Paleogene and Permo-Triassic Boundary Sequences in North America Copyright 2014 by William Stuart Mitchell, III 1 Abstract High-resolution U-Pb Geochronology of Terrestrial Cretaceous-Paleogene and Permo-Triassic Boundary Sequences in North America by William Stuart Mitchell, III Doctor of Philosophy in Chemistry University of California, Berkeley Professor Paul Renne, Co-chair Professor Evan Williams, Co-chair High-resolution geochronology provides a means to evaluate the timescales of responses to major shifts in Earth history, such as ecosystem recovery following a major impact event or a mass extinction. Additionally, geochronology can be used to correlate sections across the marine and terrestrial realm and around the world. Changes in ecosystems or isotopic composition of deposited rocks will be influenced by local effects, but can also have a global signal. With geochronlogy, the same time interval can be found in distant regions, and if a phenomenon (e.g. a carbon isotope excursion) was global in scope, many different localities each from the same time interval would show the same signal. Here I present high-resolution uranium-lead geochronology pertaining to two mass ex- tinctions: the Cretaceous-Paleogene mass extinction (around 66 million years ago, Ma) and the Permo-Triassic mass extinction (around 252 Ma).
    [Show full text]
  • Neil John Tabor
    DR. NEIL JOHN TABOR Department of Geological Sciences Southern Methodist University Dallas, TX 75275-0395 Ph: (214) 768-4175 [email protected] _____________________________________________________________________________________ Employment: Department of Earth Sciences Aug. 2014 to present Southern Methodist University Professor Department of Earth Sciences Southern Methodist University Associate Professor Aug. 2009 to July 2014 Department of Geological Sciences Aug. 2004 to July 2009 Southern Methodist University Assistant Professor Department of Geosciences Aug. 2002 to July 2004 Southern Methodist University Post-Doctoral Researcher Department of Geology Sept. 1997 to Aug. 2002 University of California, Davis Research and Teaching Assistant Bureau of Economic Geology Jan. 1997 to Sept. 1997 University of Texas, Austin Research Assistant (adviser on sabbatical at UT Austin) Department of Earth Sciences Sept. 1996 to Dec. 1996 University of California, Riverside Teaching Assistant (adviser at UC Riverside) United States Department of Agriculture May 1996 to Sept. 1996 Soil Conservation Service Soil Petrographer Education: B.S. Geology (May 1996) University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE M.S. Geology (June 1999) University of California, Davis, CA Thesis: Permo-Pennsylvanian alluvial paleosols (north-central Texas): High-resolution proxy records of the evolution of early Pangean paleoclimate: Adviser: Isabel P. Montañez Ph.D. Geology (June, 2002) University of California, Davis, CA Dissertation: Paleoclimate isotopic proxies derived from Paleozoic,
    [Show full text]
  • Western Portion of the Panhandle of Texas
    f B, Descriptive Geology, 114 "Water-Supply and Irrigation Paper No. 191 \ 0, Underground Waters, 68 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIRECTOR THE GEOLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES WESTERN PORTION OF THE PANHANDLE OF TEXAS CHARLES 1ST. WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1907 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction................................................................ 7 Area covered........................................................... 7 Sources of data. ......................................................... 7 Topography.................................................................. 7 General features....................................................... 7 High Plains.......................................................... 8 Valleys and canyons................................................... 9 Canadian River valley............................................. 9 Palo Duro Canyon.'................................................ 10 Minor stream valleys.............................................. 11 Beaver Creek valley............................................ 11 Coldwater Creek valley......................................... 11 Palo Duro Creek valley.......................................... 12 Carriso and Perico Creek valleys................................. 12 Big Blue Creek valley.......................................... 12 Tierra Blanca Creek valley...................................... 12 Geology.................................................................. 12 General
    [Show full text]
  • GY461 Palo Duro TX Geologic Map from DEM Project
    GY461 Palo Duro TX Geologic Map from DEM Project I. Introduction In this project you will create a geologic map using a digital elevation model raster image (DEM), and a single traverse where the contacts between the geological formations have been determined on the base map. Because the sedimentary rocks of Palo Duro canyon are undeformed, the contacts are horizontal and maintain a constant elevation. This also means that a geological contact will follow a contour line. II. Load the Base Map and DEM Create a project named “PaloDuro” and load the base map that is included with this document (PaloDuroProject.tif). The map coordinate system will be set to UTM NAD27 zone 14 after loading the base map. Next, load the DEM which is contained in the folder “24789681". At this point the map should appear as in Figure 1. Note that the limits of the DEM don’t match the limits of the base map exactly. III. Convert Metric DEM to Feet to Match Base Map. The DEM downloaded from the USGS Seamless Server has Z values in meter units so to compare the DEM to base map contours you need to create a new DEM based on feet. Do this with the toolbar utility “Raster Math > Times” under “3D Analyst Tools”. Use a conversion factor of 3.28 (i.e. 3.28 feet per 1.0 meter) as indicated in Figure 2. Name the new DEM raster “DEM_Feet”. IV. Convert the DEM to a Classified Raster The next step will “classify” the “DEM_feet” raster into zones that correspond to the elevation range for each geological formation based on the single traverse: Qo - Quaternary Ogallala Formation (yellow) Code = 4 ------------------------------------------------- 3300 feet Trtr - Triassic Trujillo Formation (cyan) Code = 3 ------------------------------------------------- 3150 feet Trte - Triassic Tecovas Formation (green) Code = 2 ------------------------------------------------- 2960 feet Pq - Permian Quartermaster Formation (red) Code = 1 Use the dialog window example in Figure 3 to generate the “LithoClass” classified raster.
    [Show full text]
  • Tectonic History of the Palo Duro Basin, Texas Panhandle
    OF-WTWI-1983-1 TECTONIC HISTORY OF THE PALO DURO BASIN, TEXAS PANHANDLE by Roy T. Budn; k Prepared for the U. S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Waste Isolation under contract no. DE-AC-97-83WM 46615 Bureau of Economic Geology W. L. Fisher, Director The University of Texas at Austin Un i ve rs i t Y Stat ion, P.O. Box X Austin, Texas 78712 , / ) ~' 3.3.2 TECTONIC HISTORY INTRODUCTION The Palo Duro Basin is one of a dozen or more intracratonic basins formed as a result of large-scale plate motions in the Late Paleozoic (Goldstein, 1981; Kluth and.Coney, 1981). The margins of the basin are defined by a series of uplifts that developed during the Pennsylvanian (fig. 1). The Palo Duro Basin is bounded on the northeast by the Amarillo-WiChita Uplift, on the northwest by the Bravo Dome, and on the west by the Sierra Grande and other smaller uplifts, all of which were imporant sources of sediment. To the south, the Matador Arch served as a sediment barrier and loci of carbonate buildups, as did a number of smaller, generally unnamed, uplifts to the east. The Palo Duro Basin includes sediments deposited in two temporally separate but spatially overlapping basins (Budnik and Smith, 1982). The initial basin, a northwest extension of the Hardeman Basin (fig. 2), formed as a result of the foundering of a Mississippian shelf during the latest Mississippian or early Pennsylvanian (Budnik and Smith, 1982; Dutton and others, 1982). Up to 2,500 ft (750 m) of Pennsylvanian and a similar thickness of Wolfcampian (Lower Permian), primarily marine, sediments were deposited during this phase (Dutton and others, 1982).
    [Show full text]
  • CGS Annual Conference Abstracts 2018
    OPEN ACCESS Article CGS Annual Conference Abstracts 2018 The Palo Duro Flow, a Reinterpretation of the Palo consistent with a laminar flow. A soil normally contains higher Duro Paleosol concentrations of clay minerals. F. Bauhof, D. Stansbury Primary evidence of the hyperconcentrated flow at the Independent Scholars Canadian River site includes multiple layers of suspended clasts. These layers show size consistency with upper layers The Texas Panhandle has exposures of the unconformity having clast sizes of 1-2 cm while lower clast layers have between the upper Permian Quartermaster Formation and the sizes of 10 cm or more (Figure 1 – Canadian River suspended base of the Triassic Dockum Group. At this boundary, the lower clasts). The combination of suspended clasts, inverse grading, unit is informally named the “Palo Duro Geosol” by Kanhalangsy and dewaterization features indicate that the Palo Duro Geosol (1997). The Geosol has been studied from the eastern boundary of should be reinterpreted as the Palo Duro Flow, a hyperconcentrated the Llano Estacado canyon system in Texas, north to the Canadian sediment gravity flow. River and east along the Pecos River. There are no exposures to the south as the bed is underground. Current interpretation of the boundary unit of the upper Permian as a paleosol in the Texas Panhandle correlates with the mottled beds in eastern New Mexico and the Shinarump Member of the Chinle Formation further west in New Mexico and Arizona. The depositional environment of the Dockum Group has been interpreted as fluvial and subaerial. The initial study location is a 5.54 m flow exposure, which is the type location of Kanhalangsy, in Caprock Canyon State Park, Texas.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of a Part of Western Texas and Southeast­ Ern New Mexico, with Special Reference to Salt and Potash
    GEOLOGY OF A PART OF WESTERN TEXAS AND SOUTHEAST­ ERN NEW MEXICO, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO SALT AND POTASH By H. W. HOOTS PREFACE By J. A. UDDEN : It is with great pleasure that I accept the invitation of the Director of the Geological Survey, Dr. George Otis Smith, to write a brief foreword to this report on the progress of a search for potash in which both the United States Geological Survey and the Texas Bureau of Economic Geology have cooperated for a number of years. It is a search which now appears not to have been in vain. The thought that potash must have been precipitated in the seas in which the salt beds of the Permian accumulated in America has, I presume, been in the minds of all geologists interested in the study of the Permian "Red Beds." The great extent and great thickness of these salt beds early seemed to me a sufficient reason for looking for potash in connection with any explorations of these beds in Texas. On learning, through Mr. W. E. Wrather, in 1911, of the deep boring made by the S. M. Swenson estate at Spur, in Dickens County, I made arrangements, through the generous aid of Mr: C. A. Jones, in charge of the local Swenson interests, to procure specimens of the materials penetrated. It was likewise possible, later on, to obtain a series of 14 water samples from this boring, taken at depths rang­ ing from 800 to 3,000 feet below the surface. These samples were obtained at a tune when the water had been standing undisturbed in the hole for two months, while no drilling had been done.
    [Show full text]
  • Measured Strati Graphic Sections of Uranium-Bearing Upper Triassic
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Measured strati graphic sections of uranium-bearing Upper Triassic rocks of the Dockum Basin, eastern New Mexico, west Texas, and the Oklahoma Panhandle with brief discussion of stratigraphic problems by Warren I. Finch 1 and James C. Wright* Open-File Report 83-701 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. *Deceased *U.S. Geological Survey, Box 25046, MS 916, Denver Federal Center, Denver, Colorado 80225 1983 CONTENTS Page Statement ............................................................ 1 Measured sections..................................................... 4 New Mexi co....................................................... 4 Guadalupe County............................................ 4 Santa Rosa railroad-cut section........................ 4 Sunshine Mesa-State Route 156 road-cut section......... 9 Quay County................................................. 11 Dripping Triangulation Station section................. 11 Henry Pittman Ranch section............................ 15 Rana Arroyo section.................................... 20 Revuelto Creek-U.S. Route 66 section................... 23 Texas............................................................ 26 Armstrong County............................................ 26 State Route 284 - Pleasant Creek section............... 26 Borden County............................................... 31 Muchakooago Peak
    [Show full text]
  • Timothy (Scott) Myers
    Timothy Scott Myers, Ph.D. Huffington Department of Earth Sciences Southern Methodist University Dallas, TX 75275-0395 214-883-2904 [email protected] EMPLOYMENT Research Curator, Shuler Museum of Paleontology, Southern Methodist University Apr. 2012–present Postdoctoral Fellow, Dept. of Earth Sciences, Southern Methodist University Jan. 2010–Mar. 2012 EDUCATION Ph.D. Geology (December 2009) – Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX Dissertation: Late Jurassic paleoclimate of Europe and Africa M.S. Geology (August 2004) – University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH Thesis: Taphonomy of the Mother’s Day Quarry: Implications for gregarious behavior in sauropod dinosaurs B.S. Geology; B.A. Anthropology (May 2002) – Rice University, Houston, TX PUBLICATIONS Myers, T.S. 2010. Earliest occurrence of the Pteranodontidae (Archosauria: Pterosauria) in North America: New material from the Austin Group of Texas. Journal of Paleontology 84(6): 1071– 1081. Myers, T.S. 2010. A new ornithocheirid pterosaur from the Upper Cretaceous (Cenomanian-Turonian) Eagle Ford Group of Texas. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 30(1): 280–287. Myers, T.S. and A.R. Fiorillo. 2009. Evidence for gregarious behavior and age segregation in sauropod dinosaurs. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 274: 96–104. Myers, T.S. and G.W. Storrs. 2007. Taphonomy of the Mother's Day Quarry, Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation, south-central Montana, USA. PALAIOS 22: 651–666. Myers, T.S., Tabor, N.J., and Jacobs, L.L. 2011. Late Jurassic paleoclimate of Central Africa. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 311: 111–125. Myers, T.S., Tabor, N.J., Jacobs, L.L., and Mateus, O. in press. Late Jurassic palaeoclimate of Portugal: Comparison with the Western U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • AN ARCHITECTURAL ANALYSIS and DEPOSITIONAL INTERPRETATION of the DOCKUM GROUP in the WEST TEXAS HIGH PLAINS by Grayson Hayworth
    AN ARCHITECTURAL ANALYSIS AND DEPOSITIONAL INTERPRETATION OF THE DOCKUM GROUP IN THE WEST TEXAS HIGH PLAINS by Grayson Hayworth Lamb Bachelor of Science, 2017 The University of Arkansas Fayetteville, Arkansas Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the College of Science and Engineering Texas Christian University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science May 2019 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work would not have been possible without the guidance and support provided by Dr. John Holbrook. He inspired me to “shake the bag” and see what falls out. I would like to thank my roommates and fellow geologists, Rodney Stieffel and Ben Ryan for their continuous encouragement, and inquisitive spirits. Thank you to Dr. Richard Denne for helping me keep my main goals in sight and pushing me towards them. Thank you to Dr. Walter Manger who has always been one of my biggest fans and my personal geologic hero. Lastly, a special thank you to my ever loving and caring parents, Mike and Desiree Lamb for being my rock in the ups and downs before, during and after this thesis process. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS………………………………………….……………………………. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS………………………….…………………………............................. iii LIST OF FIGURES……………………………………………………………………….............v LIST OF TABLES……………………………………………………………….........................vii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………….............1 1.1 Dockum Group Exposure…………………………………………………………......2 1.2 Previous Works………………………………………………………………………..5 1.3 Tectonic Depositional
    [Show full text]
  • Triassic Stratigraphy in Southeastern New Mexico and Southwestern Texas Spencer G
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/44 Triassic stratigraphy in southeastern New Mexico and southwestern Texas Spencer G. Lucas and Orin J. Anderson, 1993, pp. 231-235 in: Carlsbad Region (New Mexico and West Texas), Love, D. W.; Hawley, J. W.; Kues, B. S.; Austin, G. S.; Lucas, S. G.; [eds.], New Mexico Geological Society 44th Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 357 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1993 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks.
    [Show full text]