DOCSLIB.ORG

The Case of Gullah History and Culture on James Island, Sc

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Case of Gullah History and Culture on James Island, Sc COMMUNICATION, DEVELOPMENT, AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION: THE CASE OF GULLAH HISTORY AND CULTURE ON JAMES ISLAND, SC Brian Andrew Graves A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Communication Studies. Chapel Hill 2010 Approved by: Advisor: Dr. Ken Hillis Reader: Dr. Carole Blair Reader: Dr. William Ferris Reader: Dr. Jeremy Packer Reader: Dr. Sarah Sharma © 2010 Brian Andrew Graves ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT BRIAN GRAVES: Communication, Development, and Cultural Preservation: The Case of Gullah History and Culture on James Island, SC (Under the direction of Ken Hillis) This dissertation explores contemporary issues of communication, commercial development, and Gullah preservation on James Island, South Carolina. All along the coastal region of the Southeastern United States, African American communities, known as ―Gullah,‖ have retained more of their African cultural and linguistic heritage than any other large African American community. From the times of slavery to the present, Gullah communities have lived in a Southeastern coastal landscape remarkably similar to the shores of Western Africa. During the later part of the twentieth century, however, ―modern‖ suburban, commercial, and resort developments have transformed the region‘s physical, social, and economic geographies and threatened the culture‘s survival. In the wake of these developments, efforts to preserve Gullah culture have emerged, often with an emphasis on tourism, news, and entertainment projects designed to merge economic and cultural activity. The central thesis of this dissertation is that while forces of ―development‖ and ―cultural preservation‖ often appear to be at odds in popular discourse, they are actually different sides of the same coin in so far as they are a forced contextualization of people and places within systems of knowledge and communication that privilege modern European conceptions of history, politics, economics, and culture. Missing in the iii dominant social imagery of Gullah culture today, which either portrays a people who are behind the curve of modern progress, or, that evokes nostalgia for a now ―obsolete‖ way of life, is an adequate representation of the present and ongoing struggle of Gullah history, identity, and sense of place. By looking at specific and concrete situations of development and cultural preservation on James Island, the chapters of this dissertation examine how Gullah communities themselves articulate their own history and culture, and define their roles as political actors in the modern world, both through and against dominant modern conceptions of history, culture, politics, economics, and communication. Through a locally oriented cultural political economy approach, the study also seeks to understand, through the work of cultural theorists James Carey and Harold Innis, among others, how culture as a concept can be used to develop a more detailed and fruitful analysis of the political and economic problems of communication, modern development, and cultural preservation. iv For Toby & In memory of Allan Graves v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Completing this study would have been impossible without the guidance and support of many people. First, I would like to thank the people with whom I collaborated on my ethnographic work. In addition to those whom I have cited within the pages of this dissertation, there are many more people than I can name here who provided valuable insights and contributions for this project. Thank you your kindness and hospitality, for teaching me, and for being patient while I learned. By educating me, you have shaped my life in important and meaningful ways. With deepest gratitude, I thank my advisor, Ken Hillis, who gave me thoughtful guidance and strong support for my dissertation work and throughout my graduate program. As a brilliant scholar, mentor, and friend, Ken has made a big difference in my life, and I am forever grateful. He has seen this dissertation through many drafts. I do not know how I can ever repay him for the tremendous amount of time, energy, and knowledge that he has shared with me and invested in my work except to ―pay it forward.‖ I have enjoyed working with an excellent dissertation committee: Carole Blair, Bill Ferris, Jeremy Packer, and Sarah Sharma. I am always impressed with Carole‘s willingness and ability to work with more graduate students than any other faculty in our Department and consider myself very fortunate to be among them. Carole is a highly accomplished scholar with tremendous stature, yet also manages to be remarkably vi approachable and generous with her time. In addition to providing excellent guidance and support for my graduate work, she has frequently invited me and other students to her home, taken us on field trips, and worked hard to connect us with opportunities in the field of Communication Studies. Studying with the renowned folklorist and historian Bill Ferris has been a heady experience. Though Bill is well-known, in high demand, and has ―hung out‖ with the likes of B.B. King and Eudora Welty, he is also incredibly unassuming, friendly, and disarming. I am awed and inspired by the beauty and eloquence of his scholarship and filmmaking, and regard them both as standards of excellence toward which I aspire. Jeremy Packer and Sarah Sharma, in addition to being wonderful people, are superb teachers and scholars. I am grateful for their assistance and insights, which helped me enormously with my work, particularly in understanding and applying difficult Communications theory and developing my dissertation‘s methodology. I thank the Communication Studies faculty and staff, my fellow graduate students, and my students for their support, friendship, and countless rewarding intellectual experiences at Carolina. It is impossible to name everyone here, but several people deserve special mention: Mark Robinson has been a great friend, colleague, and mentor, offering me personal and professional assistance and advice throughout my graduate study. I feel so lucky to have met him, and cannot imagine having done my graduate work without him. Raphael Ginsberg has been my ―COMMrade‖ ever since we entered the Master‘s program together in 2003. Together we have enjoyed dazzling intellectual exchanges, surpassed the highest expectations of our colleagues, and completely reinvented the field of Communication Studies. I am also grateful to Vilma Berg, who vii has been extraordinarily kind and helpful in assisting me with funding and administrative issues and keeping me on track with deadlines. I thank my mother, Lynn Graves, for her love and support. In addition to giving me a place to stay while I conducted my research, she has encouraged me, believed in me, and offered me wise counsel. She has been a great listener and friend, and is always able to make me laugh, even in the toughest of times. She is my role model of character, strength, reliability, and hard work. Finally, I thank my fiancé, Toby Weisslitz, who has made my life complete. I am so fortunate to have found such a smart, funny, warm, and beautiful person with whom to spend the rest of my life. She has loved, helped, supported, and guided me in countless ways through the daily struggles and challenges of life. I will always be there for her, as she has been for me. viii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................... xii Chapter I. INTRODUCTION: COMMUNICATION AND THE PRESERVATION OF GULLAH HISTORY AND CULTURE ON JAMES ISLAND, SC ................................................................... 1 Personal Trajectory and Research Period ............................................................... 9 Research Materials and Method ............................................................................. 12 Historical Method .................................................................................................. 12 Ethnographic Method............................................................................................. 15 Communication Theory ......................................................................................... 17 Chapter Summaries ................................................................................................ 20 II. A CULTURAL HISTORY OF LANDOWNERSHIP AND DEVELOPMENT ON JAMES ISLAND, SC ............................................... 27 Background ........................................................................................................... 28 Communication and Colonization .......................................................................... 35 Agricultural Development and Gullah culture ........................................................ 40 Communication and Real Estate Development ....................................................... 51 Real Estate Development in African American Communities: A Cultural Perspective .................................................................... 57 Local Media and Development in Sol Legare and Grmball Farm ................................................................................ 63 ix Communication and the Future of Development on James Island ................................................................................ 69 III. COMMUNICATION AND THE PRESERVATION OF SOL LEGARE‘S SEASHORE FARMER‘S LODGE 767 ...............................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Difficult Plantation Past: Operational and Leadership Mechanisms and Their Impact on Racialized Narratives at Tourist Plantations
    THE DIFFICULT PLANTATION PAST: OPERATIONAL AND LEADERSHIP MECHANISMS AND THEIR IMPACT ON RACIALIZED NARRATIVES AT TOURIST PLANTATIONS by Jennifer Allison Harris A Dissertation SubmitteD in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Public History Middle Tennessee State University May 2019 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Kathryn Sikes, Chair Dr. Mary Hoffschwelle Dr. C. Brendan Martin Dr. Carroll Van West To F. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I cannot begin to express my thanks to my dissertation committee chairperson, Dr. Kathryn Sikes. Without her encouragement and advice this project would not have been possible. I would like to express my deepest appreciation to my dissertation committee members Drs. Mary Hoffschwelle, Carroll Van West, and Brendan Martin. My very deepest gratitude extends to Dr. Martin and the Public History Program for graciously and generously funding my research site visits. I’m deeply indebted to the National Science Foundation project research team, Drs. Derek H. Alderman, Perry L. Carter, Stephen P. Hanna, David Butler, and Amy E. Potter. However, I owe special thanks to Dr. Butler who introduced me to the project data and offered ongoing mentorship through my research and writing process. I would also like to extend my deepest gratitude to Dr. Kimberly Douglass for her continued professional sponsorship and friendship. The completion of my dissertation would not have been possible without the loving support and nurturing of Frederick Kristopher Koehn, whose patience cannot be underestimated. I must also thank my MTSU colleagues Drs. Bob Beatty and Ginna Foster Cannon for their supportive insights. My friend Dr. Jody Hankins was also incredibly helpful and reassuring throughout the last five years, and I owe additional gratitude to the “Low Brow CrowD,” for stress relief and weekend distractions.
    [Show full text]
  • Mcleod PLANTATION JAMES ISLAND Sa
    FfO.1: 'lIIE HIS'lORIC CHARIES'lON FOUNDATION 'lO: WILLIS J. KEITH, JAMES IS. ,SC - 12 APRILI", 19~ HISTORIC S~Y FOR McLEOD PLANTATION JAMES ISLAND sa , . , . , 1,. ~ •• McLEOD PLANTATION Su.ozn.:i.tted By F:i.11~ore G. Wi1son Me~dors Constru.ction Corpor~t:i.on Apr i 1 1 6.. 1 99:3 , '. t , --------- OWNERSHIP CHAIN ._-_........­ OWNERSHIP CHAIN McLEOD PLANTATION )­ Thornton-Morden map, The Thornton-Morden map of 1695 shows the South Carolina property on which the McLeod Plantation Historical Society, would be situated as belonging to Morris. Charleston, S.C.; The Morris on the map is probably Morgan James P. Hayes, Morris who came to James Island from James and Related Virginia in December, 1671. Sea Islands, (Charleston: Walker Evans & Cogswell Company, 1978), 7. Royal Grants # 0002­ In 1703 Captain Davis received a grant 005-0038-02, South from the Lords Proprietors for a plot of Carolina Archives land on James island containing 617 acres. The land was bounded generally by : N: Wappoo Creek and the marsh of the Ashley River S: Partly by New Town Creek and partly by the land laid out to Richard Simpson. W: Lands of M. Shabishere E: The marsh of New Town Creek Charleston Deeds In 1706 Captain Davis and his wife Ann #0007-001-00S0­ sold their land to William Wilkins. 00435-00, 1737-1739, William Wilkins sold the land several South Carolina times and repurchased it each time until Department of 1741. Archives and History, Columbia, S.C. 1 Charleston Deeds, On April 14, 1741, William Wilkins and Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORIC PLACES in SOUTH CAROLINA ////////////////////////////// September 2015
    AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORIC PLACES IN SOUTH CAROLINA ////////////////////////////// September 2015 State Historic Preservation Office South Carolina Department of Archives and History should be encouraged. The National Register program his publication provides information on properties in South Carolina is administered by the State Historic in South Carolina that are listed in the National Preservation Office at the South Carolina Department of Register of Historic Places or have been Archives and History. recognized with South Carolina Historical Markers This publication includes summary information about T as of May 2015 and have important associations National Register properties in South Carolina that are with African American history. More information on these significantly associated with African American history. More and other properties is available at the South Carolina extensive information about many of these properties is Archives and History Center. Many other places in South available in the National Register files at the South Carolina Carolina are important to our African American history and Archives and History Center. Many of the National Register heritage and are eligible for listing in the National Register nominations are also available online, accessible through or recognition with the South Carolina Historical Marker the agency’s website. program. The State Historic Preservation Office at the South Carolina Department of Archives and History welcomes South Carolina Historical Marker Program (HM) questions regarding the listing or marking of other eligible South Carolina Historical Markers recognize and interpret sites. places important to an understanding of South Carolina’s past. The cast-aluminum markers can tell the stories of African Americans have made a vast contribution to buildings and structures that are still standing, or they can the history of South Carolina throughout its over-300-year- commemorate the sites of important historic events or history.
    [Show full text]
  • Halifax, Shawn Place of Interview: Mcleod Plantation, James
    Voices of Southern Hospitality: An Oral History Project Interviewee: Halifax, Shawn Place of Interview: McLeod Plantation, James Island, South Carolina Date of Interview: 2018-07-03 Interviewed by: Robbins, Laura Date of Transcription: 2019-03-14 Transcribed by: Estelle Rounsefell Length of Interview: 00:36:45 Keywords and Subject Headings: plantations, historical interpretation, history, museums, Mother Emanuel, cultural tourism, gentrification, historic sites, inclusiveness, interpretation, McLeod Plantation, Gullah-Geechee, locals, tourists, southern hospitality Abstract: The interview begins with Halifax’s background, and how he became an interpreter in Charleston. He talks about the way he has seen different developments in Charleston is industry and tourism, and that they aren’t necessarily bad changes. He mentions the way Charleston has often entertained a romantic notion of the Antebellum South. He thinks there are changes in the ways narratives are being told and interpreted in plantations and house museums, namely that the darker parts of Southern history like slavery are becoming integrated into the regular history for the better. He mentions the way the dynamic between himself, and locals and tourists can sometimes be different due to their knowledge of the area. He discusses his idea of stereotypical southern hospitality, which includes over-the-top fake enthusiasm. Hospitality to him is saying yes ma’m, yes sir, and smiling and acknowledging those you pass on the street. He references a saying he learned growing up about how “southern whites love the individual and hate the group, and northern whites the opposite.” He wants to see intolerant attitudes change in the future, and for Charlestonians to embrace and welcome differences in demographics, ideas, and culture.
    [Show full text]
  • South Carolina National Heritage Corridor Evaluation Findings
    South Carolina National Heritage Corridor Evaluation Findings Cynthia Helba, Ph.D. Preethy George, Ph.D. Glynis Jones, M.S. August 2012 Prepared for: Prepared by: United States National Park Service Westat Washington, DC 1600 Research Boulevard Rockville, Maryland 20850-3129 (301) 251-1500 Table of Contents Section Page Executive Summary................................................................................................................ 1 Section 1: Introduction .................................................................................................... 14 Section 2: Overview of the South Carolina National Heritage Corridor and Coordinating Entity ........................................................................................ 24 Section 3: The South Carolina National Heritage Corridor Corporation Structure and Organization ........................................................................... 37 Section 4: Public/Private Investments in SCNHC and their Impact ...................... 78 Section 5: SCNHC Coordinating Entity Sustainability .............................................. 87 Tables Table 1 Crosswalk of Heritage Area Purposes, Goals, and Current Activities ............................................................................................................. 3 Table 2.1 SCNHC Timeline ........................................................................................... 28 Table 3.1 Crosswalk of Heritage Area Purposes, Goals, and Current Activities ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Interpreting the Dynamics of Urban Slavery in the South Institution: Telfair Museum of Art, Inc
    Sample of a Successful Implementation Application This document contains the narrative and walkthrough of a previously funded grant application. Every successful application is different, and this application many have been prepared to meet a slightly different set of guidelines. Each applicant is urged to prepare a proposal that reflects its unique project and aspirations, as well as the requirements in the current notice of funding opportunity (NOFO). Prospective applicants should consult the current Public Humanities Projects NOFOs at https://www.neh.gov/grants/public/public- humanities-projects for instructions. Applicants are also strongly encouraged to consult with the NEH Division of Public Programs staff well before a grant deadline. The attached application is incomplete. Portions may have been deleted to protect the privacy interests of an individual, and/or to protect confidential commercial and financial information, and/or to protect copyrighted materials. Project Title: The Owens-Thomas House: Interpreting the Dynamics of Urban Slavery in the South Institution: Telfair Museum of Art, Inc. Project Director: Shannon Browning-Mullins Grant Program: Public Humanities Projects, Historic Places Implementation Telfair Museums 2 Abstract Telfair Museums seeks a $400,000 NEH Historic Places implementation grant to reinterpret its Owens-Thomas House and Slave Quarters, transforming this National Historic Landmark through interactive exhibits on the slave economy, gender dynamics, and the impacts of urban slavery in the South. Scheduled to take 1.5 years to complete with a total budget of $872,706, this reinterpretation plan builds on more than 20 years of humanities scholarship, including Telfair’s national-award-winning project Slavery and Freedom in Savannah, which launched one of the country’s first full-scale attempts to tell the story of urban slavery in the South.
    [Show full text]
  • James Island County Park
    COMMISSIONERS: Andy Thomas, Chair Teddy Manos, Vice Chair Collin Bruner, Secretary-Treasurer Benjy Cooke Eduardo Curry Lisa King Mattese Lecque David Bennett, Executive Director Commission Update __________________________________________________________________________________ May 10, 2017 Commission Meeting – Monday, May 15, 2017 - CCPRC Headquarters at 5:30 pm Guests: We are not expecting any guests at this time. However, I would anticipate that a few SK8 Park or Marina patrons may join us on Monday. Commission Meeting Highlights Finance Committee Meeting: The Finance Committee will not meet this month. Agenda Overview New Business: Parklands Foundation: Tom will share the progress that the Foundation is making. Planning and Capital Projects Update: Kevin will give an update on the Planning and Captial Projects as well as the approved 5-Year Capital Improvements Plan Projects. Financial Report: There is one item that will require Commission action on Monday evening that is explained in the packet. Agency Highlight: Kevin and Gina will give an update on the rebranding of Johns Island County Park and Mullet Hall Equestrian Center. 861 Riverland Drive Charleston, South Carolina 29412 (843) 762-2172 FAX (843) 762-2683 1 CHARLESTON COUNTY PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING 861 RIVERLAND DRIVE, CHARLESTON, SC, 29412 MONDAY, MAY 15, 2017 AGENDA I. Call To Order And Welcome Thomas A. Introduction of Guests and Notification to Media II. Public Comments/Presentations Thomas III. Approval of Minutes Thomas A. (ACTION) Approval of April 17, 2017 Regular Commission Meeting minutes IV. Old Business A. None IV. New Business A. Parklands Foundation Update King/O’Rourke B. Planning and Capital Projects Report Bowie C.
    [Show full text]
  • Mcleod Plantation Survey 2008
    Archaeological Survey and Testing of Select Locations, McLeod Plantation, James Island Archaeological Contributions 41 The Charleston Museum September 2008 Archaeological Survey and Testing of Select Locations, McLeod Plantation, James Island 2007Archaeological Field School College of Charleston/The Charleston Museum By Martha Zierden Lynn Harris With contributions from Ronald Anthony Barbara Borg Tim Chesser Archaeological Contributions 41 The Charleston Museum Prepared for American College for the Building Arts Charleston, South Carolina September 2008 ii Table of Contents Chapter I: Introduction Introduction . 1 Previous Research . 4 Research Potential . 6 Chapter II: Background Site Description . 9 History of the Property . 10 Summary of Occupation . 27 Chapter III: Survey of Area C Field Methods . 29 Results . 32 Summary . 34 Chapter IV: Survey of the Waterfront Introduction . 49 Location . 49 Fieldwork . 49 Material Culture . 55 Recommendations . 57 Chapter V: Testing Near the Allee Proposed Research . 59 Field Methods . 60 Description of Proveniences . 61 Laboratory Procedures . 65 Analysis of Material Culture . 66 Summary . 83 Chapter VI: Testing the Dairy Field Methods . 89 Description of Excavated Proveniences . 90 Material Culture . 94 Interpretations . 107 Chapter VII: Summary Summary of Findings . 111 References Cited . 117 iii List of Figures Chapter I 1. McLeod House, south elevation . 1 2. Charleston quadrangle, showing McLeod location . 2 3. View of Allee and Slave Cabins . 3 4. View of fields, facing south . 3 5. Map of McLeod, showing projects by Brockington . 5 6. Slave Cabins in 1930 and 2008 . 7 Chapter II 7. Front of McLeod house, view of waterfront . 9 8. Map of Sensitivity Zones . 9 9. Mortier map of 1696 . 11 10.
    [Show full text]
  • CALHOUN COUNTY Fort Motte Vicinity
    CONTENTS F I R S T T A B Acknowledgements 2015...................... 2 Foreword 2015 ..................................... 3 Acknowledgements 2008/2012 ............ 4 Foreword 2008/2012 ............................ 5 Introduction ......................................... 6 How to Use This Book ........................... 7 How to Interpret Entries ....................... 9 Map of Historical Sites by County ....... 10 S E C O N D T A B Historical Sites by County ................... 11 Abbeville 11 Aiken 11 Allendale 14 Anderson 14 Bamberg 15 Barnwell 15 Beaufort 16 Berkeley 25 Calhoun 28 Charleston 28 Cherokee 41 Chester 41 Chesterfield 42 Clarendon 43 Colleton 44 Darlington 45 Dillon 49 Dorchester 49 Edgefield 51 Fairfield 51 Florence 52 Georgetown 56 Greenville 60 Greenwood 63 Hampton 65 Horry 65 Jasper 67 Kershaw 67 Lancaster 69 Laurens 70 Lee 72 Lexington 72 Marion 72 Marlboro 74 Newberry 75 Oconee 76 Orangeburg 78 Pickens 84 Richland 85 Saluda 99 Spartanburg 99 Sumter 100 Union 101 Williamsburg 103 York 104 T H I R D T A B Academic Standards Introduction ..... 107 Teaching Activities ............................ 109 Lesson Plans ..................................... 133 F O U R T H T A B Places to Visit ................................... 213 Internet Resources ........................... 223 F I F T H T A B Indices .............................................. 227 Standard Indicator Index 227 Alphabetical Index 245 Time Period Index 253 Subject Index 259 Artwork: Temporary window coverings created by students from Benedict College, Claflin University, Columbia College, and the University of South Carolina for Bethel A.M.E. Church/Renaissance Cultural Arts Center Columbia ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS - 2015 Edition he South Carolina African American Heritage Foundation South Carolina African American (SCAAHF) is very pleased to introduce the updated and Heritage Commission 2 T revised edition of A Teacher’s Guide to African American Board Members Historic Places in South Carolina.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Ward Draft Design Package
    DRAFT CONCEPT DESIGN — FORT WARD MUSEUM & HISTORIC SITE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA, VA SEPTEMBER 13, 2018 PHASE III: DRAFT CONCEPT FINALDESIGN DESIGN © INTRODUCTION CONTENTS OF THIS DOCUMENT PURPOSE AND NEXT STEPS FORT WARD: A BROADER STORY Introduction 1 This Draft Concept Design presents the selected This design presents a unified story about Fort Ward, Overview 2 elements from the alternatives presented to before, during, and after the Civil War. We commend Museum Enhancements 3 stakeholders on January 18, 2018. This represents the project team and stakeholders for working Orientation Stations 4 the penultimate step under this contract in the design together to develop a theme statement, “Bastions Recreated Home Frame 5 of new interpretive products at Fort Ward Museum & of Freedom,” that roots visitors in an overarching Community Gateway 7 Historic Site in Alexandria, Virginia. narrative. Commemoration Space 9 Updated Waysides 13 This package includes the elements outlined in This passage from prior directives is worth retaining, Site Markers 18 the Scope of Work and previously discussed, which as we think the ongoing planning makes good on the Media Notes: Mobile Web 20 together will create a new visitor experience at Fort goals from the 2015 Management Plan: Ward. Please note that a companion Draft Interpretive Typical Structures Details 21 “... the importance of the ongoing efforts Plan contains more content, including materials Media Notes: Brochure 22 to preserve the Civil War fortification, as documenting prior stakeholder review/comment and Media Notes: Educational Programs 24 described in the FWAG chapter report on Civil historical matter underpinning the designs presented Catalogue of Existing Waysides 25 War Resources, can be further amplified and in this package.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining Slavery's Architectural Finishes: the Importance of Interdisciplinary Investigations of Humble Spaces
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Theses (Historic Preservation) Graduate Program in Historic Preservation 2018 Examining Slavery's Architectural Finishes: The Importance of Interdisciplinary Investigations of Humble Spaces Rebekah Zubaida Yousaf University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Yousaf, Rebekah Zubaida, "Examining Slavery's Architectural Finishes: The Importance of Interdisciplinary Investigations of Humble Spaces" (2018). Theses (Historic Preservation). 655. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/655 Suggested Citation: Yousaf, Rebekah Zubaida (2018). Examining Slavery's Architectural Finishes: The Importance of Interdisciplinary Investigations of Humble Spaces (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/655 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Examining Slavery's Architectural Finishes: The Importance of Interdisciplinary Investigations of Humble Spaces Abstract This thesis studies the evidence of architectural finishes in slave dwellings as a vehicle for understanding their lives, experiences and culture. Reviewing the finishes analyses of slave quarters in eight case studies, the author examines evidence of original finishes and observes how they can inform our understanding of slavery, including the possibility of a transfer of color traditions from Africa. The author
    [Show full text]
  • Slave Housing: in Search of Endangered Architecture Syra V
    Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses 5-2012 Slave Housing: In Search of Endangered Architecture Syra V. Valiente Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Recommended Citation Valiente, Syra V., "Slave Housing: In Search of Endangered Architecture" (2012). All Theses. 1398. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/1398 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SLAVE HOUSING: IN SEARCH OF ENDANGERED ARCHITECTURE A Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University and the College of Charleston In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Historic Preservation By: Syra V. Valiente May 2012 Accepted by: Dr. Carter L. Hudgins, Committee Chair Professor Ralph C. Muldrow Professor James L. Ward ii | Slave Housing In Search of Endangered Architecture ABSTRACT Although enslaved Africans constituted a significant majority of the population of Charleston County, South Carolina, from the early eighteenth century until the Civil War, only miniscule number of former slave houses survive. Intense analysis of the surviving slave houses at McLeod Plantation on James Island raises questions about what inherent aspects of their plan and construction constitutes what this study labels “slave architecture.” The emergence, development and decline of slave houses reflects the broader history of slavery in the South Carolina Lowcountry and suggests that improved documentation of these rare buildings can play an important role in conveying the history of Charleston County’s antebellum black majority.
    [Show full text]