DOCSLIB.ORG

Political Parties of the Republic of Armenia Participating in the National Assembly Elections 2007

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Political Parties of the Republic of Armenia Participating in the National Assembly Elections 2007 FOUNDATION FOR CIVIL AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORS AND EDITORS Samvel Mkhitaryan, Chairman of the Foundation, Project Initiator and Leader Mkrtich Anushyan, Executive Director of the Foundation, Project Coordinator Vakhtang Margaryan, Project Manager Arthur Hambardzumyan, Head of Project Staff Work and expert group Ara Hambardzumyan Karine Mkhitaryan Roman Melikyan Lusine Muradyan Evgenya Danielyan Anush Grigoryan POLITICAL PARTIES OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA PARTICIPATING IN THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY ELECTIONS 2007 VOTER’S GUIDEBOOK YEREVAN, 2007 1 “POLITICAL PARTIES OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA PARTICIPATING IN THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY ELECTIONS 2007” VOTER’S GUIDEBOOK “FOUNDATION FOR CIVIL AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT”, YEREVAN, 2007 – 120 pages. Authors and Editors Samvel Mkhitaryan , Mkrtich Anushyan , Vakhtang Margaryan , Arthur Hambardzumyan , Ara Hambardzumyan , Karine Mkhitaryan , Roman Melikyan , Lusine Muradyan , Evgenya Danielyan , Anush Grigoryan This Voter’s Guidebook presents brief, unbiased, comparative information on activities, objectives, goals and program fundamentals of political parties participating in RA National Assembly elections 2007. This Guidebook is developed on the basis of responses as provided by parties in the questionnaire developed within the scope of the grant project ''Political Parties of the Republic of Armenia Directory and Voter's Guidebook'' implemented by the Foundation for Civil and Social Development, non-commercial organization (Foundation) and fundamentals included in parties' official public documents. This Guidebook is designed to be widely disseminated among NGOs and international organizations, political parties, education institutions, foundations, state authorities and the general public. Publication of this Guidebook was made possible by the support of Counterpart International’s Civic Advocacy Support Program (CASP), and the support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under Cooperative Agreement No. 111-A-00-04-00056-00 Publication of the Guidebook was also supported by the OSCE Office in Yerevan. The content, views and opinions expressed in this Guidebook are those of the political parties and the Foundation of Civil and Social Development, and within the scope of their responsibility and do not necessarily reflect the views of Counterpart International, Civic Development and Partnership Foundation, OSCE and OSCE office in Yerevan. This Guidebook is not meant for sale. © FOUNDATION FOR CIVIL AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT 2007 ISBN 978-99941-832-0-4 2 Dear Reader, It is unquestionable that availability of unbiased, comparative, comprehensive and up-to-date information on ideological distinctions, program goals and objectives of political parties, as well as their positions on critical issues in the focus of public attention plays a decisive role in formation of a conscious political stance among the citizens. Unfortunately, RA population is deprived of the opportunity of receiving unbiased and comparative information on RA political parties and their activities, which diminishes the ability of citizens to think independently, shape rationalized opinion and make self-determined conscious decisions. This phenomenon, being a motive for political indifference among wider segments of the population, in addition hinders sustainability, enhanced responsibility and accountability of political parties and development of political society. Particularly, it is for this reason that the pre-election processes occasionally turn into self-glorification and dis-reputation of opponents, instead of public competition of ideas, programs and positions on hot and crucial issues. Consequently, political orientation of citizens disorientated in actual differences of positions of numberless political parties and political figures and indigent of personal conscious attitude is more often influenced by advertisements, fame of parties and their leaders, differing persuasions and elections bribes. Furthermore, unbiased information on parties and their activities is occasionally replaced with self-appraisals, qualification, misinformation, advertisement. The latter is even more hazardous than the lack of real information and wields tremendous negative impact on public demand and trust for unbiased information in general. Solution of the above issues and provision of unbiased, comparative and accessible information on activities, objectives, goals and program fundamentals of political parties to the general public was endeavored by the Foundation of Civil and Social Development supported by the U.S. Embassy in Armenia back in 2004 within the framework of project “Political Parties of the Republic of Armenia”, which included development of the database on RA political parties, active as of 01.09.04, as well as development, publication of the Directory on Political Parties of the Republic of Armenia, publicly available in both English and Armenian languages. However, the political field is constantly changing in line with amendments in the legal framework regulating the field, as a result of which appear new political parties, some parties get liquidated, others - merge, change their political standpoints, etc. Consequently, the information on political parties should be regularly revised and updated, especially in the eve of RA National Assembly and Presidential elections. Thus, development and publication of this guidebook and constant update of the information database and website primarily serve the aim of increased awareness of population on RA political parties through regular provision of systematic, comparative, impartial, accessible and up-to-date information and enhanced responsibility and accountability of political parties. The latter will contribute to enhancement of RA citizens’ civil activity and responsibility, formation of justified political orientation and conscious decision making. Samvel Mkhitaryan, Chairman of the Foundation for Civil and Social Development, Project Initiator and Leader 3 TABLE OF CONTESTS INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................................5 POLITICAL PARTIES OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA PARTICIPATING IN THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY ELECTIONS 2007 *..............................................................................................................................7 1. “NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY” .......................................................................................................................7 2. “NATIONAL ACCORD” PARTY ................................................................................................................................12 3. “NATIONAL UNITY PARTY”.....................................................................................................................................15 4. “PROSPEROUS ARMENIA” PARTY.........................................................................................................................19 5. “DASHINK” PARTY .....................................................................................................................................................27 6. “HERITAGE” PARTY ..................................................................................................................................................31 7. PEOPLE’S PARTY .......................................................................................................................................................38 8. “DEMOCRATIC HOMELAND” PARTY ...................................................................................................................41 9. “DEMOCRATIC WAY” PARTY .................................................................................................................................45 10. “ARMENIAN REVOLUTIONARY FEDERATION DASHNAKTSUTYUN” PARTY........................................50 11. PROGRESSIVE PARTY OF ARMENIA...................................................................................................................54 12. ARMENIAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY.......................................................................................................................57 13. YOUTH PARTY OF ARMENIA ................................................................................................................................61 14. PEOPLE’S PARTY OF ARMENIA............................................................................................................................64 15. COMMUNIST PARTY OF ARMENIA ....................................................................................................................68 16. REPUBLICAN PARTY OF ARMENIA.....................................................................................................................71 17. MARXIST PARTY OF ARMENIA ............................................................................................................................76 18. “ARMENIAN NATIONAL MOVEMENT” PARTY................................................................................................80 19. “REPUBLIC” PARTY .................................................................................................................................................84 20. UNITED LABOUR PARTY ........................................................................................................................................87 21. UNITED LIBERAL
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Armenia Page 1 of 13
    Country Report on Human Rights Practices in Armenia Page 1 of 13 Armenia Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2006 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor March 6, 2007 Armenia, with a population of approximately 3.2 million, is a republic. The constitution provides for a popularly elected president (Robert Kocharian) and a unicameral legislature (National Assembly). A constitutional referendum in 2005 and presidential and National Assembly elections in 2003 were seriously flawed and did not meet international standards. The country has a multiparty political system. Civilian authorities generally maintained effective control of the security forces; members of the security forces committed a number of human rights abuses. The government's human rights record remained poor, and serious problems remained. Citizens were not able freely to change their government; authorities beat pretrial detainees; the national security service and the national police force acted with impunity; authorities engaged in arbitrary arrest and detention; prison conditions were cramped and unhealthy, although slowly improving; authorities imposed restrictions on citizens' privacy, freedom of the press, and freedom of assembly. Journalists practiced self-censorship, and the government and laws restricted religious freedom. Violence against women and spousal abuse were problems, as were trafficking in persons, discrimination against persons with disabilities, and societal harassment of homosexuals. There were reports of forced labor. There were some improvements during the year. The implementation of constitutional reforms ratified in 2005 led to some increase in judicial independence and for the first time gave citizens direct access to the Constitutional Court. Penalties for trafficking were toughened and a court for the first time imposed financial, as well as criminal, penalties on traffickers.
    [Show full text]
  • International Delegation Commemorates Genocide Anniversary in Istanbul
    MAY 11, 2013 MirTHErARoMENr IAN -Spe ctator Volume LXXXIII, NO. 43, Issue 4288 $ 2.00 NEWS IN BRIEF The First English Language Armenian Weekly in the United States Since 1932 Buildings for Syrian International Delegation Commemorates Refugees in Armenia YEREVAN (Armenpress) — Sites have been chosen in the cities of Ashtarak, Echmiadzin and Masis for Genocide Anniversary in Istanbul the construction of buildings and detached houses for the Syrian-Armenians settled in the Republic of ISTANBUL — An unprece - Armenia. dented joint delegation of the The chief of staff at the Diaspora Ministry, Firdus Armenian General Benevolent Zakaryan, stated that upon the successful conclu - Union (AGBU) Europe and sion of the program, other sites will also be allo - European Grassroots Antiracist cated in future. Movement (EGAM) comprising Zakaryan stressed: “There are three elements in 20 people from 15 European the programs. The government of the Republic of countries, gathered here to Armenia will also contribute to the program. The commemorate the Armenian Syrian-Armenian community will pay for a certain Genocide of 1915. They were part of the cost, and the rest will be paid by the invited by DurDe! (Say Stop to sponsor. The first sponsor has already been found. Racism and Nationalism), a Upon the wishes of the Syrian-Armenians, Turkish organization that has detached houses will be built as well.” been commemorating the The Yerevan State University of Architecture and Armenian Genocide for the past Construction will provide its services free of four years. charge. The sites were allocated upon the order of On April 24, symbolically at President Serge Sargisian.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ARMENIAN Mirrorc SPECTATOR Since 1932
    THE ARMENIAN MIRRORc SPECTATOR Since 1932 Volume LXXXXI, NO. 43, Issue 4685 MAY 15, 2021 $2.00 Former President Kocharyan Looks And Acts Like New Candidate By Raffi Elliott Special to the Mirror-Spectator YEREVAN – Armenia’s second president, Robert Ko- charyan, took a further step towards formalizing his par- ticipation in upcoming snap parliamentary elections on Sunday, May 9. At a press briefing for his newly-established electoral alliance, dubbed the Armenia Bloc, the former president told reporters that he decided to return to politics to rectify what he believes are great threats to the country’s long- Russian peacekeepers arriving in Shushi last year (Sputnik photo) term security and stability allegedly caused by the cur- rent authorities. Kocharyan accuses Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan’s government of failing to provide security in Russia Vows No Letup in Karabakh Peace Efforts border regions, signing the November 9 cease-fire on un- YEREVAN (RFE/RL) — Russia will keep doing its best forts to get Armenia and Azerbaijan to open their transport favourable terms, and mismanaging the economy. to ensure the full implementation of the Russian-brokered links after decades of conflict. He said a trilateral working agreement that stopped the Armenian-Azerbaijani war in group formed by the Russian, Armenian and Azerbaijani Nagorno-Karabakh, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said governments for that purpose is helping to further stabilize during a visit to Yerevan on Thursday, May 6. the situation in the Karabakh conflict zone. “We are not reducing our efforts at returning all detainees to their homes, demining, preserving cultural and religious heritage as well as launching the work of relevant interna- “We are not reducing our efforts tional organizations in Nagorno-Karabakh,” Lavrov said at returning all detainees to their homes, demining, preserving cultural and religious heritage..
    [Show full text]
  • Histoire De L'arménie
    ARTAK MOVSISSIAN HISTOIRE DE L’ARMÉNIE MANUEL SCOLAIRE ER EVA N, 2016 ÉDITIONS DE L’UNIVERSITÉ D’ÉTAT D’EREVAN CDU 94(479.25) L’édition est recommandée par les Conseils scientifiques de la Faculté d’Histoire de l’Université d’État d’Erevan et de l’Institut d’Histoire de l’Académie Nationale des Sciences de la République d’Arménie Le manuel a été composé sur la commande du Ministère de la Science et de l’Éducation de la République d’Arménie. Publié grâce au mécénat du Fonds scientifique, éducatif et culturel «ARATTA ». Traduit de l’arménien par Aïda Tcharkhtchian MOVSISSYAN ARTAK , Histoire de l’Arménie. Manuel scolaire. Erevan, Editions UEE, 2016, 120 p. ISBN 978-5-8084-2053-3 © Movsissian A. INTRODUCTION L’année 1915 a été fatale pour l’histoire de l’Arménie, et non seulement comme celle du génocide: c’est alors qu’a pris le début d’un tournant sans précédent de notre histoire, lorsque la majorité des Arméniens s’est dispersée dans le monde entier, alors que c’est la minorité des Arméniens qui continue à vivre sur la terre natale De nos jours aussi, 70% environ des Arméniens vivent dans la diaspora et 30% seulement sur leur terre natale. L’un des principaux objectifs des Arméniens dispersés à travers le monde est de préserver leur identité nationale en recevant une éducation arménienne. Malheureusement, toutes les communautés arméniennes ne possèdent pas d’écoles arméniennes. Souvent, nos communautés sont contraintes à se contenter d’écoles du dimanche qui deviennent des foyers d’arménienté où se réunissent les enfants arméniens vivant loin de leur patrie pour retrouver leurs origines et leur identité nationales.
    [Show full text]
  • Byzantine Missionaries, Foreign Rulers, and Christian Narratives (Ca
    Conversion and Empire: Byzantine Missionaries, Foreign Rulers, and Christian Narratives (ca. 300-900) by Alexander Borislavov Angelov A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (History) in The University of Michigan 2011 Doctoral Committee: Professor John V.A. Fine, Jr., Chair Professor Emeritus H. Don Cameron Professor Paul Christopher Johnson Professor Raymond H. Van Dam Associate Professor Diane Owen Hughes © Alexander Borislavov Angelov 2011 To my mother Irina with all my love and gratitude ii Acknowledgements To put in words deepest feelings of gratitude to so many people and for so many things is to reflect on various encounters and influences. In a sense, it is to sketch out a singular narrative but of many personal “conversions.” So now, being here, I am looking back, and it all seems so clear and obvious. But, it is the historian in me that realizes best the numerous situations, emotions, and dilemmas that brought me where I am. I feel so profoundly thankful for a journey that even I, obsessed with planning, could not have fully anticipated. In a final analysis, as my dissertation grew so did I, but neither could have become better without the presence of the people or the institutions that I feel so fortunate to be able to acknowledge here. At the University of Michigan, I first thank my mentor John Fine for his tremendous academic support over the years, for his friendship always present when most needed, and for best illustrating to me how true knowledge does in fact produce better humanity.
    [Show full text]
  • May 22, 1947 Memorandum, Armenian Communist Party Central
    Digital Archive digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org International History Declassified May 22, 1947 Memorandum, Armenian Communist Party Central Committee Secretary Grigory Arutinov to Josef Stalin, 'About the Mood of a Part of the Armenians Repatriated From Foreign Countries' Citation: “Memorandum, Armenian Communist Party Central Committee Secretary Grigory Arutinov to Josef Stalin, 'About the Mood of a Part of the Armenians Repatriated From Foreign Countries',” May 22, 1947, History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, National Armenian Archives. Translated by Svetlana Savranskaya http://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/117338 Summary: Arutinov reports on the mood of the "repatriated" Armenians, members of the diaspora who were encouraged to move to Armenia by the Soviet government. The report describes assistance given to the over 50,000 repatriated Armenians and efforts to deal with dissatisfied members who were "in favor of re-emigration." Credits: This document was made possible with support from the Leon Levy Foundation. Original Language: Russian Contents: English Translation SECRETARY CC VCP/b/ Comrade STALIN I. V. ABOUT THE MOOD OF A PART OF THE ARMENIANS REPATRIATED FROM FOREIGN COUNTRIES Out of 50,945 Armenians, who arrived from foreign countries, 20,900 are able to work; they all were given employment at industrial enterprises, construction, in the teams of craft cooperation, and the peasants— in the collective and state farms. The main mass of repatriated Armenians adjusted to their jobs and takes an active part in productive activities. A significant part participates in the socialist competition—for early fulfillment of the plans, and many of those exhibit high standards in their work. There is a small part of the repatriated, who initially switched from one job to another and subsequently engaged in trade and speculation on the markets.
    [Show full text]
  • "From Ter-Petrosian to Kocharian: Leadership Change in Armenia
    UC Berkeley Recent Work Title From Ter-Petrosian to Kocharian: Leadership Change in Armenia Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0c2794v4 Author Astourian, Stephan H. Publication Date 2000 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California University of California, Berkeley FROM TER-PETROSIAN TO KOCHARIAN: LEADERSHIP CHANGE IN ARMENIA Stephan H. Astourian Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies Working Paper Series This PDF document preserves the page numbering of the printed version for accuracy of citation. When viewed with Acrobat Reader, the printed page numbers will not correspond with the electronic numbering. The Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies (BPS) is a leading center for graduate training on the Soviet Union and its successor states in the United States. Founded in 1983 as part of a nationwide effort to reinvigorate the field, BPSs mission has been to train a new cohort of scholars and professionals in both cross-disciplinary social science methodology and theory as well as the history, languages, and cultures of the former Soviet Union; to carry out an innovative program of scholarly research and publication on the Soviet Union and its successor states; and to undertake an active public outreach program for the local community, other national and international academic centers, and the U.S. and other governments. Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies University of California, Berkeley Institute of Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies 260 Stephens Hall #2304 Berkeley, California 94720-2304 Tel: (510) 643-6737 [email protected] http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~bsp/ FROM TER-PETROSIAN TO KOCHARIAN: LEADERSHIP CHANGE IN ARMENIA Stephan H.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia-Armenia
    SHS Web of Conferences 29, 01040 (2016) DOI: 10.1051/shsconf/20162901040 EEIA - 2016 Russian Language as a Factor of Strengthening Unified Humanitarian and Educational Space of CIS: Russia-Armenia Tigran E. Marinosyan1,*, and Yulia G. Kurovskaya2 1 ISED RAE, Laboratory of Theoretical Pedagogy and Philosophy of Education, 105062, Moscow, Russia 2 ISED RAE, Academic Secretary, 105062, Moscow, Russia Abstract. The article deals with the problem of language unity and communication gaps between the post-Soviet countries retrospectively, which is important for determining the direction of the future development of the members of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS). The focus is on the language situation in Russia and Armenia, two countries which have long- standing and strong friendly bonds based on successful cooperation in addressing important international problems, including in the education sphere. The aspects covered in the article include normative-legal documentation regulating state language policies; the role of the native language in education; the issue of the status of the Russian language in oral and written communication. The relations between the peoples inhabiting Russia interactions. Of particular importance is the problem of have played an important and in many ways critical role preserving, strengthening and expanding the common in the history of the formation and development of the language basis on the Commonwealth territory, the use Russian multinational state. The study of the of Russian as the universal instrument of forming a relationships among the peoples living on Russia’s unified educational space and the development of territory has been relevant at all times not only for relations among CIS countries in general.
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • Mission in Armenia 29 March to 3 April 2008
    Mission in Armenia 29 March to 3 April 2008 June 2008 - N°499/2 Mission in Armenia, 29 March to 3 April 2008 FOREWORD Alerted by both the "Democracy in Armenia" group and the Civil Society Institute (an FIDH affiliate) to the violent repression that followed the presidential elections in this country in February 2008, the undersigned lawyers and jurist were mandated by the President of the Paris Bar Association (M. le Bâtonnier de l’Ordre des Avocats de Paris) and the International Union of Lawyers (l’Union Internationale des Avocats) on one hand and, on the other hand, the FIDH (International Federation of Human Rights). The mission visited Yerevan from 29 March to 3 April to report on the situation of the right to defend oneself and the right to freedoms in the Republic of ARMENIA following the events that took place in February and March 2008. INTRODUCTION Before considering the legal and juridical context of the mission's work, it is appropriate to recall some chronological milestones to put into perspective the current situation in Armenia and its evolution, seventeen years after the independence of the Republic of Armenia was proclaimed in the Southern Caucasus. - 21 September, 1991: the Republic of Armenia becomes independent following a referendum. - October 1991: Election by universal suffrage of Mr. Levon TER-PETROSIAN, who becomes the first President of the Republic of Armenia. - 1992-1994: Fighting in the autonomous region of Nagorno-Karabakh between the opposing Armenian self- defence forces and the Azerbaijan armed forces. A cease-fire comes into force on 14 May 1994.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Assembly of the 7Th Convocation
    MONITORING OF THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY 7TH CONVOCATION | 1ST SESSION 1ST REPORT Բաց Հասարակության Հիմնադրամներ - Հայաստան MONITORING OF THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY 7TH CONVOCATION | 1ST SESSION | 1ST REPORT The publication of the report was made possible through the assistance of the Open Society Foundations-Armenia, grant #19943. The views and analyses contained in this report reflect the opinions of the authors and do not necessarily represent the positions and views of the Open Society Foundations-Armenia. YEREVAN 2019 FOREWORD Mandate NGO presents the monitoring results of the work over the 4th session of the National Assembly of the 6th convocation and the 1st one of the National Assembly of the 7th convocation. The period under review was exceptional in the parliamentary history. For the first time the legislature ceased its work before the completion of the 5-year term set by law. The National Assembly of the 6th convocation formed by the results of the elections on April 2, 2017 functioned only for 1.5 years. The political developments unfolding after the April revolution led to the dissolution of the the National Assembly and holding of early parliamentary elections.’ The report summarizes the key indicators of the work of the parliament of the 6th convocations, looks at the impact of the political developments on the exercise of the lawmaking and oversights functions of the NA. We followed the first phase of work of the parliament of the 7th convocation, reviewed the key tenets of the election programs of the political forces represented in the National Assembly, their similarities and differences. The summary was prepared by combining the observations of the jounralists, expert analytical reviews and data of the statistical application of the parliamentmonitoring.
    [Show full text]
  • Party Politics in Armenia: a Primer
    Section I. An Introduction to the Armenian Party System Introduction Political parties are vital for the functioning of a healthy democratic political order. In the strictest sense this is only an assumption, albeit one that most political scientists would agree with. Larry Diamond’s observation is apt: “Political parties remain important if not essential instruments for presenting political constituencies and interests, aggregating demands and preferences, recruiting and socializing new candidates for office, organizing the electoral competition for power, crafting policy alternatives, setting the policy-making agenda, forming effective governments, and integrating groups and individuals into the democratic process” (1997:xxv). Like party politics in other postcommunist states, on the surface, Armenian party politics can be somewhat confusing, especially to the uninitiated. Hopefully this essay can clear the ground a bit. It examines party politics in Armenia and assumes, like Diamond, that the consolidation of a functional party system is crucial to Armenia’s continued transition to democracy. It also assumes that the reader knows little, if anything, about Armenia politics or political parties. The essay is, by design, rather long, as it is intended to be a fairly comprehensive source of information for Armenian party politics. A few notes about the essay are appropriate before the subject matter is addressed. First, because the essay is intended for a general, as well as a scholarly audience, citations have been kept to a minimum and are included in footnotes (rather than in text). Along these lines, I have avoided the common practice of using acronyms or abbreviations for party names, so as to avoid confusion.
    [Show full text]