DOCSLIB.ORG

Logistics Processes and Motorways of the Sea II

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Logistics Processes and Motorways of the Sea II Logistics Processes and Motorways of the Sea II ENPI 2011 / 264 459 Номер контракта ENPI 2011 / 264 459 Logistics Processes Processes and Motorways and of the Motorways Sea II of the Sea II in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, Uzbekistan Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, Uzbekistan Inception Report – Annex 4 Progress Report II – Annex 5 Action Plans TRACECA Inland Waterways – Danube Case Study July 2011 April 2012 This project is funded by A project implemented by the European Union Egis International / Dornier Consulting A project implemented by This project is funded by Egis International / Dornier Consulting the European Union Progress Report II Annex 5 – Danube Case Study Page 1 of 127 Logistics Processes and Motorways of the Sea II TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 9 2 GENERAL PERSPECTIVE FOR EXPLOITING TRACECA INLAND WATERWAYS ...................... 12 3 EUROPEAN POLICY ......................................................................................................................... 14 4 ORGANIZATION SECTOR ................................................................................................................ 17 4.1 THE DANUBE COMMISSION ............................................................................................................ 17 4.2 NATIONAL TRANSPORT STRATEGIES (ROMANIA, BULGARIA) ............................................................ 18 4.2.1 Romania ............................................................................................................................ 18 4.2.1.1 Salient Facts and Figures ....................................................................................... 18 4.2.1.2 Intermodal Transport Strategy to 2020 – General Overview .................................. 19 Rail Transport .............................................................................................................. 19 Road Mode .................................................................................................................. 20 4.2.1.3 Intermodal Transport Strategy to 2020 – Intermodal Terminals ............................. 21 Existing Infrastructure.................................................................................................. 21 Proposals to Modernize Old / Build New Terminals .................................................... 21 4.2.1.4 Intermodal Transport Strategy to 2020 – Conclusions ........................................... 25 4.2.2 Bulgaria ............................................................................................................................. 28 4.2.2.1 Salient Facts and Figures ....................................................................................... 28 4.2.2.2 The Strategy for the Development of the Transport System of the Republic of Bulgaria until 2020 – General Overview ................................................................. 29 Rail Transport .............................................................................................................. 31 Road Transport ........................................................................................................... 34 4.3 RIVER AND SEA GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES AND NATIONAL COMPANIES MONITORING THE DANUBE IN ROMANIA AND BULGARIA ............................................................................................................... 36 4.3.1 Romania ............................................................................................................................ 36 4.3.1.1 Romanian Naval Authority ...................................................................................... 36 4.3.1.2 National Company ‘Administration of Navigable Canals’........................................ 36 4.3.1.3 National Company ‘Maritime Ports Administration’ SA, Constanta Port ................. 40 4.3.1.4 River Administration of the Lower Danube (AFDJ, Galati) ..................................... 46 4.3.1.5 Fluvial Danube Ports Administration, Giurgiu ......................................................... 48 4.3.2 Bulgaria ............................................................................................................................. 48 4.3.2.1 Executive Agency Maritime Administration (EAMA, Sofia) ..................................... 48 4.3.2.2 Executive Agency for the Exploration and Maintenance of the Danube River (EAEMDR, Ruse) .................................................................................................... 49 4.3.2.3 Bulgarian Ports Infrastructure Company (BPI Co.) ................................................. 51 5 PORTS IN TRACECA COUNTRIES ON THE DANUBE, TRAFFIC, ON-GOING PROJECTS AND PERSPECTIVES ................................................................................................................................ 52 5.1 SEA PORTS IN BULGARIA (SEAPORTS IN ROMANIA ARE REVIEWED IN PARA 4.3.1 ABOVE) ................. 52 5.1.1 Burgas ............................................................................................................................... 52 5.1.2 Varna ................................................................................................................................. 55 5.2 RIVER PORTS ................................................................................................................................ 57 5.2.1 Romania ............................................................................................................................ 57 5.2.1.1 Lower Danube ......................................................................................................... 59 5.2.1.2 Maritime Danube ..................................................................................................... 62 5.2.2 Bulgaria ............................................................................................................................. 67 5.2.2.1 Ruse ....................................................................................................................... 67 Progress Report II Annex 5 – Danube Case Study Page 1 of 127 Logistics Processes and Motorways of the Sea ll 5.2.2.2 Belene ..................................................................................................................... 70 5.2.2.3 Vidin ....................................................................................................................... 72 5.2.3 Moldova ............................................................................................................................. 77 5.2.3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 77 5.2.3.2 Giurgiulesti .............................................................................................................. 79 5.2.4 Ukraine .............................................................................................................................. 83 5.2.4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 83 5.2.4.2 Izmail ....................................................................................................................... 85 5.2.4.3 Reni ....................................................................................................................... 88 6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................. 93 6.1 WORKING GUIDELINES ................................................................................................................... 93 6.1.1 Taking the Logistics Dimension into Due Account............................................................ 93 6.1.2 Involving Users and Operators ......................................................................................... 94 6.1.3 Capitalizing on European Experience ............................................................................... 95 6.1.4 Developing Regional Cooperation .................................................................................... 97 6.2 POTENTIAL MARKETS, CUSTOMERS AND SERVICES ......................................................................... 99 6.2.1 Renewal of the Ro-Ro Service Bulgaria-Georgia ............................................................. 99 6.2.2 Attracting Turkish and Other Trucking Companies ........................................................... 99 6.2.3 Developing Ro-La Offer through the Balkans ................................................................. 100 6.2.4 Container Feeder Services on the Danube .................................................................... 100 6.3 MARITIME DANUBE CLUSTER ....................................................................................................... 101 7 APPENDIXES ................................................................................................................................... 106 7.1 APPENDIX 1: BYSTROE CANAL STORY .......................................................................................... 106 7.1.1 Historical background ....................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sustainable Local Development in Romania in the Opportunity of Creating Jobs
    European Journal of Sustainable Development (2020), 9, 3, 287-304 ISSN: 2239-5938 Doi: 10.14207/ejsd.2020.v9n3p287 Sustainable Local Development in Romania in the Opportunity of Creating Jobs By Florina Bran1, Ghenadie Ciobanu2, Maria Loredana Popescu3, Petrut Cristian Vasilache4 Abstract The economic, social transformations of the last three decades of evolution of rural development both in Romania and in general in rural areas in the context of globalization have radically changed the vision, thinking and attitude of the rural population. As a result, it has led to a massive migration of population to other developed countries. This phenomenon is also characteristic for Romania. At the same time, the technological development has a massive impact on the process of organizing the society and the evolution of the society, both the evolution of biotechnologies, nanotechnologies, branches in the field of chemistry, biochemistry and digitization, which have impact on the development or underdevelopment of the areas in poverty and underdevelopment. economic, but at the same time they will be able to make an essential contribution to the local rural development and to the creation of new job opportunities for both young people and specialists from different branches, as well as for vulnerable groups of population from the rural area. In this article we aim to address these issues and come up with certain solutions and proposals. Keywords: Sustainable local development, rural areas, technological development, digitization 1. Introduction The objectives of the „EU sustainable development strategy including an environmental dimension (Rădulescu et al., 2018). This recognizes that in the long term, economic growth, social cohesion and environmental protection must go hand in hand.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Report Romania 2020
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 26.2.2020 SWD(2020) 522 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Country Report Romania 2020 Accompanying the document COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK AND THE EUROGROUP 2020 European Semester: Assessment of progress on structural reforms, prevention and correction of macroeconomic imbalances, and results of in-depth reviews under Regulation (EU) No 1176/2011 {COM(2020) 150 final} EN EN CONTENTS Executive summary 4 1. Economic situation and outlook 9 2. Progress with country-specific recommendations 17 3. Summary of the main findings from the MIP in-depth review 21 4. Reform priorities 25 4.1. Public finances and taxation 25 4.2. Financial sector 30 4.3. Labour market, education and social policies 33 4.4. Competitiveness, reforms and investment 45 4.5. Environmental Sustainability 63 Annex A: Overview Table 67 Annex B: Commission debt sustainability analysis and fiscal risks 75 Annex C: Standard Tables 76 Annex D: Investment guidance on Just Transition Fund 2021-2027 for Romania 82 Annex E: Progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 85 References 90 LIST OF TABLES Table 1.1: Key economic and financial indicators 16 Table 2.1: Assessment of 2019 CSR implementation 19 Table 3.1: MIP assessment matrix (*) - Romania 2020 23 Table C.1: Financial market indicators 76 Table C.2: Headline Social Scoreboard indicators 77 Table C.3: Labour market and education indicators 78 Table C.4: Social inclusion and health
    [Show full text]
  • “Bulgarian State Railways - Cargo Freights” Ltd
    Journal of Advanced Management Science Vol. 7, No. 2, June 2019 The Necessity to Improve the Competitive Power of “Bulgarian State Railways - Cargo Freights” Ltd. S Tzvetkova and E Savova University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria Email: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract—“Bulgarian State Railways - Cargo Freights” Ltd. replacement services in cargo railway transport can be is the leading association on the Bulgarian market for evaluated as HIGH, which has a negative reflection on carrying out railway cargo freights. In recent years, freight volumes in the sector, with it reaching up 10% in however, the freight volume has decreased and the comparison to other types of transport. The traction- company has reported negative financial indicators. The changes that have occurred in Bulgarian economy, the rolling stock is growing old, which leads to operative market’s liberalization, the impossibility for making problems, increased repair costs and deteriorated quality investments, the obsolete rolling stock, the deteriorating of services, which respectively reduces the competitive quality of transport services and the reduced competitive power. power are among the main reasons for that. The The financial situation of “BSR – Cargo Freights” Ltd. substantiated necessity for increasing the freight volume, is serious. In its short 10-year history, the association has improving the financial indicators and retaining the market registered negative financial indicators which result from share is the main motive for writing this paper. To that end, the external environ ment and from ineffective internal factors from the internal and external environments have activities and processes. The total amount of losses for been analyzed through the implementation of PESTEL, 5 FORCES and SWOT analyses.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee on Regional Development the Secretariat
    COMMITTEE ON REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT THE SECRETARIAT October 2008 REPORT of the Committee on Regional Development's Delegation to Bulgaria from 30 September to 2 October 2008 European Parliament - Committee on Regional Development - The Secretariat SUMMARY Visit to Bulgaria to meet with Government Ministers and officials as well as the leaders of local administrations responsible for regional Subject development projects. Under the 2006 regulations the whole of Bulgaria qualifies for assistance under the Convergence objective. The field missions had the following main objectives: - To discuss with Ministers, relevant officials and local authorities the future implementation of the Regional development Operational Programme and sectoral programmes as well as to discuss with them any problems they may have. Main objectives - To acquaint members of the delegation with the specific problems of Bulgaria and see in situ some successful projects executed with pre-accession funds and discuss the implementation of operational programmes which are just starting up. Date 30 September to 02 October 2008 Sofia, Gorna Orjahovica, Arbanasi, Balchik, Varna Places Chairman Gerardo Galleote, Chair of the Regional Development Committee. The list of participants is attached in the annex. 2 of 11 European Parliament - Committee on Regional Development - The Secretariat BACKGROUND On the initiative of the Bulgarian Vice President of the Committee on Regional Development Mr Evgeni KIRILOV (PSE), the committee decided to send a delegation to Bulgaria. It was the last out of three delegation trips of the REGI Committee scheduled for 2008. Bulgaria is of particular interest to the Members of the Regional Development Committee for a number of reasons: Together with Romania, Bulgaria is the first Balkan country to join the European Union in the latest phase of the ongoing enlargement process.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 1 Outline of the Study
    PART 1 OUTLINE OF THE STUDY The Study on Mater Plan for Hazardous Waste Management in Romania Final Report Japan International Cooperation Agency Volume 5 Summary PART 1 OUTLINE OF THE STUDY 1. Study Background Japan International Cooperation Agency decided to conduct the Study on “Master Plan for Hazardous Waste Management in Romania” in response to the request of the Government of Romania. In 2001, JICA conducted a baseline study using Environmental Resources Management (ERM), a UK consulting firm. In November 2001, JICA and the Ministry of Waters and Environmental Protection (MWEP) of Romania have signed the Scope of Work and Minutes of Meeting for the Study. In February 2002, JICA commenced the Study by forming a JICA Study Team comprising of two Japanese consulting firms. In general, Romanian hazardous waste management is poor and backward. Main problems include: 1) Low level of awareness on the part of citizens and industry about possible impacts of hazardous waste on health and environment. 2) There are almost no treatment and disposal facilities dedicated for hazardous waste. 3) Low level of application of industrial pollution prevention, control (IPPC) and cleaner production (CP). 4) Low level of the government capacity for law enforcement and poor information system 5) Lack of steady and reliable implementation plan of EU directives in spite of vigorous transposition of the directives. 6) Difficulty for industrial enterprises to acquire funds for industrial and environmental upgrading. 2. Study Objective The Study Objective is: • To strengthen hazardous waste management system in Romania at both governmental and private sector levels. Major focuses of the Study is: • To strengthen the government organizations, as well as to strengthen the awareness of the private sectors that generates hazardous waste.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Full Document About Romania
    About Romania Romania (Romanian: România, IPA: [ro.mɨni.a]) is a country in Southeastern Europe sited in a historic region that dates back to antiquity. It shares border with Hungary and Serbia to the west, Ukraine and the Republic of Moldova to the northeast, and Bulgaria to the south. Romania has a stretch of sea coast along the Black Sea. It is located roughly in the lower basin of the Danube and almost all of the Danube Delta is located within its territory. Romania is a parliamentary unitary state. As a nation-state, the country was formed by the merging of Moldavia and Wallachia in 1859 and it gained recognition of its independence in 1878. Later, in 1918, they were joined by Transylvania, Bukovina and Bessarabia. At the end of World War II, parts of its territories (roughly the present day Moldova) were occupied by USSR and Romania became a member of Warsaw Pact. With the fall of the Iron Curtain in 1989, Romania started a series of political and economic reforms that peaked with Romania joining the European Union. Romania has been a member of the European Union since January 1, 2007, and has the ninth largest territory in the EU and with 22 million people [1] it has the 7th largest population among the EU member states. Its capital and largest city is Bucharest (Romanian: Bucureşti /bu.kureʃtʲ/ (help·info)), the sixth largest city in the EU with almost 2 million people. In 2007, Sibiu, a large city in Transylvania, was chosen as European Capital of Culture.[2] Romania joined NATO on March 29, 2004, and is also a member of the Latin Union, of the Francophonie and of OSCE.
    [Show full text]
  • Horizontal Issues and Legislative Procedures on 3Rd August, a Meeting of the Development Council Was Carried Out
    Implementation of the Structural funds in Bulgaria Monthly brief, August-September 2011 Horizontal issues and legislative procedures On 3rd August, a meeting of the Development Council was carried out. There was a discussion on the priorities of the National Development Programme: Bulgaria 2020 (NDP), which were finally approved. On 20th September a meeting-discussion of the Inter-institutional Working group for the elaboration of the National Development Programme: Bulgaria 2020 was hold. The meeting included a presentation by an expert from the OECD, Mr. Jose Enrique Garcilazo, who presented some analytical findings of the publication Regional Outlook 2011, which provided important information that would be helpful in the process of preparation of the National Development Programme: Bulgaria 2020. On 27th September, a Round Table „From National Goals and Priorities of the National Development Programme: Bulgaria 2020 to Partnership Contract for Development and Investments 2014-2020” was hold in Sofia. A public discussion concerning the elaboration of the National Development Programme: Bulgaria 2020, its strategic goals and priorities, and the main areas of interventions, where the policy’ effects will be most important for the development of the country took place. The main participants of the academic society of the country were invited in the event and expressed their opinion on the process of preparation of the document. Regarding the financial corrections mechanism, a permanent interministerial work group for supporting the managing authorities will be established. The main tasks of the work group will be to discuss different cases where financial corrections will be imposed and to support methodologically the Managing Authorities regarding the process of imposing financial corrections under the OPs.
    [Show full text]
  • A Massive Restoration in Bulgaria
    Eastern Star Journal of the New Europe MarchRailway 2014 Heritage Trust, helping railway preservation in the New Europe Number 56 December 2014 A Massive Restoration in Bulgaria One of the Bulgarian State Railways’ 46 Class locomotives, reputed to be Europe’s largest tank engines, is shown here under restoration in the Sofia locomotive depot. This 2-12-4T should be ready for operation in 2015. Tsanko Simeonov writes: The development of railways is closely related to many records. Many of us want to ride on the TGV in France or Shinkansen in Japan, or to reach Gornegrat by the remarkable rack railway of the Swiss Railways. Bulgarian Railways also offer unique experiences for railway enthusiasts – rides through the picturesque narrow-gauge line Septemvri – Dobrinishte or through the Iskar Gorge near Sofia on trains hauled by several restored steam locomotives – 609.76, 01.23, 03.12 and 05.01. The rides will be far more exciting, as completion of restoration work on one of the two preserved steam 2-12-4T locomotives, No.46.03, is scheduled for the first half of 2015. The locomotives of the class 46 are well known as the most powerful steam locomotives of BDZ and the largest tank locomotives in Europe. How it all began Several tourist operators showed quite a strong interest in the restoration of the locomotive 46.03. BDZ agreed to check the possibility for the restoration and sent a team of experts to pre-evaluate the technical condition of the locomotive at the Asenovo depot during the autumn of 2013. The results were satisfactory - the locomotive was almost fully equipped and with minor defects.
    [Show full text]
  • Hemus Motorway
    PROJECT Hemus motorway Funding: National (Bulgaria) Duration: Jan 1992 - Dec 2020 Status: Complete Background & policy context: The route of the "Hemus" highway is part of the European road network connection to Corridor IV west to Corridor IX near Veliko Tarnovo. The realization of the highway will allow for connection of eastern and western parts of Bulgaria with the trans-European network. "Hemus" highway is seen as a strategic project, under whose impact is expected to accelerate the process of economic and social cohesion at regional level. Its construction will affect regional economies of the three planning regions of Bulgaria - North-West, North-Central and North-East, with a favourable impact on the business and creating new jobs. The total population that will benefit from improved infrastructure is approximately 2.9 million. People over an area of ​almost 44 percent of the country. "Hemus" highway will connect the capital of the country - Sofia with the Bulgarian sea capital - Varna as duplicate class roads E70 from Varna to Shumen, E772 from Shumen to Jablanica Jablanica and E83 from Sofia. The expected length of the highway is about 420 km. Currently in operation are the sections "junction" Yana "-okolovrasten road Sofia - Jablanica" and ". Belokopitovo - Shumen - Varna "with a total length of about 170 km. "Hemus" highway will be east-west link in northern Bulgaria and Varna port, a key location for trade with Ukraine, Russia and Turkey. Objectives: Missing sections of the 'Hemus' highway starts from the town. Jablanica, Lovech region, west and ends at p. Belokopitovo, Shumen district, east and has a length of about 252 km.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Agreement
    Translation ® European Company for the Financing of Railroad Rolling Stock BASIC AGREEMENT Edition 2007 / 1 Basic Agreement In order to determine the general principles of operation of "EUROFIMA", European Company for the Financing of Railroad Rolling Stock, the undersigned railway administrations (hereinafter called the "administrations") have agreed as follows: Part 1 - Field of the Company's activity For the first two years of its existence, the Company's activities shall be limited to administrations of states which are signatories of the international Convention relat- ing to the establishment of this Company on the one hand, and to wagons of stan- dard type or performance to be incorporated into the EUROP wagon pool, on the other. Part 2 - Ordering of stock The administrations shall be bound: - to inform the Company, upon request, of their general requirements in railway rolling stock of standard type or performance; - to indicate the portion of these requirements which could possibly be met by the Company, with the understanding that the administrations shall remain free at all times to meet all or part of their requirements by other means. EUROFIMA shall endeavor, according to its financial possibilities, to coordinate portions of these requirements into annual programs comprising comparable stock. It shall invite tenders from manufacturers in an attempt to obtain the best possible conditions from them. These tenders shall be from as wide a field as possible in order to encourage international competition. Before finally contracting the loans necessary for the purchase of stock and placing the corresponding orders, the Company shall seek the agreement of the admin- istrations concerned.
    [Show full text]
  • Considerations Regarding Management Optimization
    “Mircea cel Batran” Naval Academy Scientific Bulletin, Volume XV – 2012 – Issue 2 Published by “Mircea cel Batran” Naval Academy Press, Constanta, Romania COMERCIAL TRADING OF LIQUID CARGO THROUGH PORT OF MIDIA Viorel FLORESCU1 Alecu TOMA, 2 1 University assistant, Nautical Science Department, “Mircea Cel Batran” Naval Academy 2 Lecturer, PhD, Nautical Science Department, “Mircea Cel Batran” Naval Academy Abstract: Port of Midia, the second large port on the Romanian Black Sea litoral, has been projected to accommodate the Oceanic Fishing Fleet and to manipulate liquid cargo (petrochimical products) and Life Stock. Except the „traditional ways of transport „ on the road and rail way”, Port of Midia is the gate for the Poarta Alba – Midia- Navodari canal which connects the Black Sea with Danube River. Industry evolution in the last 30 years has imposed changing of the harbour logistics and facilities in order to respond and to face the new challenges. Today, in the Port of Midia, the main categories of cargo operated are: Crude oil, Clean Refined Products, GPL , Scrap Iron and Life stock. The increment of the refining capacity of the petrochimical industry, has imposed the need of finding new solutions for higher eficiency of the liquid cargo handling through port of Midia. In order to export bigger quantities of clean products the port logistics and facilities will have to be reconsidered, the navigating chanel will have to be enlarged so that the oil tankers that will be accommodated by the Midia Harbor to be higher than 10.000 tdw. Same thing can be achieved with a specialized white product SPM installed off port limit.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Transport Strategy for the Period Until 2030
    INTEGRATED TRANSPORT STRATEGY FOR THE PERIOD UNTIL 2030 MAY 2017 Ministry of Transport, Information Technology and Communications TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 I. INTRODUCTION 13 II. STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK 13 2.1 EUROPEAN UNION TRANSPORT POLICY 13 2.2. NATIONAL TRANSPORT POLICY 17 2.3 NATIONAL STRATEGIC DOCUMENTS 19 III. NATIONAL OBJECTIVES AND PRIORITIES 21 IV. SITUATION ANALYSIS 22 4.1 DATABASE 22 4.1.1 ORGANISATION FOR DATA COLLECTION 22 4.1.2 ASSESSMENT OF THE DATA 24 4.1.3 ELECTRONIC DATABASE 26 4.2 MACROECONOMIC, DEMOGRAPHIC AND SOCIAL ANALYSIS 28 4.2.1 MACROECONOMIC ANALYSIS 28 4.2.2 DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS 34 4.2.3 SOCIAL ANALYSIS 39 4.2.4 INDUSTRY 40 4.2.5 INTERNATIONAL TRADE 50 4.2.6 TRASNPORT AND ENVIRONMENT 57 4.3 RAILWAY TRANSPORT 62 4.3.1 INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK 62 4.3.2 PERFORMANCE AND VOLUME INDICATORS OF Rail TRANSPORT 62 4.3.3 MARKET STRUCTURE 66 4.3.4 RAILWAY INFRASTRUCTURE 81 4.3.5 ROLLING STOCK 87 4.3.6 SAFETY AND SECURITY 88 4.3.7 INTEROPERABILITY 88 4.3.8 INTELLIGENT TRANSPORT SYSTEMS 89 4.4 ROAD TRANSPORT 91 4.4.1 PERFORMANCE AND VOLUME INDICATORS OF ROAD TRANSPORT 91 4.4.2 MARKET STRUCTURE 91 4.4.3 ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE 105 4.4.4 SAFETY AND SECURITY 115 4.4.5 ANALYSIS OF THE ROAD VEHICLES STRUCTURE AND CONDITION 116 4.5 MARITIME AND INLAND TRANSPORT 117 4.5.1 INDICATORS FOR THE WORK AND VOLUME OF TRANSPORT IN THE PORTS 117 4.5.2 MARKET STRUCTURE OF SEA AND RIVER TRANSPORT 118 4.5.3 PORT INFRASTRUCTURE 120 4.5.5 ACCESIBILITY OF TRANSPORT SERVICeS 131 4.5.6 SAFETY AND SECURITY 133 4.6 TRANSPORT 135 4.6.1 PERFORMANCE
    [Show full text]