Petersburg National Battlefield Foundation Document Overview

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Petersburg National Battlefield Foundation Document Overview NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Foundation Document Overview Petersburg National Battlefield Virginia Contact Information For more information about the Petersburg National Battlefield Foundation Document, contact: [email protected] or (804) 732-3531 or write to: Superintendent, Petersburg National Battlefield, 5001 Siege Rd, Petersburg, VA 23803 Purpose Significance Significance statements express why Petersburg National Battlefield resources and values are important enough to merit national park unit designation. Statements of significance describe why an area is important within a global, national, regional, and systemwide context. These statements are linked to the purpose of the park unit, and are supported by data, research, and consensus. Significance statements describe the distinctive nature of the park and inform management decisions, focusing efforts on preserving and protecting the most important resources and values of the park unit. • The longest in both time (9.5 months) and distance (37 miles) combative military front on American soil, the campaign, siege, and defense of Petersburg saw five critical battles (the Second Battle for Petersburg, the Battle of the Crater, the assault on Fort Stedman, Five Forks, and the Third Battle for PETERSBURG NATIONAL BATTLEFIELD Petersburg) that effectively reduced the Confederate Army preserves the historic sites, of Northern Virginia by eliminating its logistical capabilities, structures, and landscapes where and resulted in the evacuation of the Confederate government from its capital, Richmond, Virginia. the Civil War campaign, siege, and defense of Petersburg took place, • Reflecting both the causes and consequences of the Civil and fosters an understanding of War, the Eppes Plantation, upon which more than 100 these events, their causes, impacts, enslaved people worked, in 1864–65 served as the command and legacy to individuals, the headquarters for Lt. General Ulysses S. Grant while he oversaw community, and the nation. all Union Army operations in the final year of the Civil War. • Petersburg National Battlefield protects surviving Union and Confederate trenches, breastworks, and earthen fortifications, an assemblage that stretched along a 37-mile front and reflects the evolution of military strategy and trench warfare technology during the final desperate years of the Civil War. Significance Fundamental Resources and Values • In order to supply and sustain two Union armies of more Fundamental resources and values are those features, systems, than 100,000 soldiers positioned on an operational front processes, experiences, stories, scenes, sounds, smells, or encompassing 176 square miles, City Point was transformed other attributes determined to merit primary consideration from a small port town at the confluence of the Appomattox during planning and management processes because they are and James Rivers into the largest logistical support of field essential to achieving the purpose of the park and maintaining operations during the entire Civil War, becoming one of the its significance. busiest seaports and railroad networks in the world at that time. • Siege Landscape • The United States Colored Troops (USCT) engaged in more • City Point active combat throughout the Petersburg Campaign than any other campaign of the war, resulting in 15 of the 16 Medals • Archeological Resources of Honor awarded to American infantrymen during the Civil War being presented to troops for valor during the Siege of • Museum Collections Petersburg. By the end of 1864, the first full USCT Corps was • Poplar Grove National Cemetery formed, representing the largest African American fighting force assembled during the Civil War. • Solemnity of Sites • In the spring of 1865, President Abraham Lincoln spent two Petersburg National Battlefield contains other resources weeks based at City Point touring the Petersburg front, meeting and values that may not be fundamental to the purpose and with Union generals Grant and Sherman, as well as Admiral significance of the park, but are important to consider in Porter, to lay out the framework for the terms of surrender management and planning decisions. These are referred to as for the Confederate armies and the restoration of the United other important resources and values. States of America, and saw firsthand the devastation at both Petersburg and Richmond after these cities fell. • Civil War Monuments • Established in 1866 as one of the earliest national • Appropriate Recreation cemeteries, Poplar Grove National Cemetery honors and • commemorates the ultimate sacrifice and serves as the final Natural Communities resting place of more than 6,000 Union soldiers including African Americans and American Indians who reflect the ethnic diversity of the individuals who fought for the United States during the Civil War. Broad Street Exit 76 5th St 33 Grapevine Bridge exit Exit 360 Fairfield Avenue ad 75 Ro rive Old Hanover ile rt D Exit Road M o e p G in Air 31 Dabbs N r a p 7th House 156 e 195 3rd v i n e R Exit Trent o 74C a House d Main St 25th St Exit 195 64 Exit 197 Meadow R oad Exit Seven Pines 200 60 National Cemetery Richmond National W ill Cemetery iam sb ur Exit 28 g R oad 33 60 156 295 5 D a rb 1 yt ow 301 n R o a d N 895 Ch e arle w s City Road RICHMOND M Darbytown Road a Osborne Turnpike Exit 25 r k e t R o a d Da rb yt ow n R oa d Battlefield Description95 Park Road Mill Road 150 5 Exit 67 Exit 22 Fussell’s New Market Mill Heights Long Bridge Road J e f F f o Petersburg National Battlefield commemorates the siege and e Fort Harrison u r Establishedr in 1926 to preserve the lands where these final M s National Cemetery il o Chaffin’s e n W Drewry’s Farm Fort D N e a e w s v Bluff Harrison Creek t i e s Richmond National r Richmond National M n battles for control of the city of Petersburg that occurred H desperate months of the CivilBattlefield War Park unfolded, Petersburga National i g Battlefield Park r k h d e w K a t ings Ro R 656 land u a R y n o a d during the final years of the Civil War. As Confederate forces BattlefieldBellwood Roadprotects more than 2,650 acres in and around the V a r in a R 5 o a Deep Bottom d prepared to defend the Confederate capital of Richmond, Lt. city of Petersburg. Because of the complexity Henrico and County Park length of the 613 H Pams o Willis Road k Ave e Fort - B Stevens Exit 64 r a Chesterfield d General Ulysses S. Grant realized that the key to capturing the y siege, park lands are spread over a large geographic area and County Park R o a d city lay in controlling supply lines from the neighboring city of are managed as five administrativeFort units: the Eastern Front, the Brady Petersburg. In an effort to take Petersburg, a pitched battle was Western Front, Five Forks, Poplar Grove National Cemetery, 288 Half-Way House Exit 615 fought on June 15–18, 1864, but Federal forces were unable to and Grant’s Headquarters62 at City Point. These units are linked Dutch Gap Chesterfield 732 County Park rout the Confederate defenders, resulting in a stalemate and together by a 33-mile-long tour route that allowsJ visitors to 616 A 295 M O ld 1 S Battery Dantzler E 301 t beginning the 9.5 months siege of Petersburg. a Chesterfield explore the historic sites of the Petersburg CampaignS and g e County Park Trent’s Reach R R d I Chester Exit V 61 Bermuda Triangle E connect to the historicRoad events of the Civil War and Rthe sacrifices Hundred Ro As Union and Confederate armies dug into their positions, a Ware Bottom ad Spring Road made during the nine and one-half months siege of Petersburg. 608 732 Parker’s Battery RICHMOND & PETERSBURG RAILROAD Richmond National Bermuda Hundred network of earthworks, trenches, and fortifications took shape Battlefield Park Exit 15 Landing on the landscape east, south, and southwest of Petersburg. 827 S 10 E M R ine A E Numerous attempts to break the siege resulted in some of the L J V tt I e R wl Point of Rocks o Chesterfield Grant’s Headquarters bloodiest battles of the entire war as Union forces tightened H County Park BERMUDA at City Point Point of HUNDRED Rocks Appomattox Grant’s Cabin Plantation Pecan Avenue Exit Cedar their grip on Petersburg. Finally, on April 1, 1865, the Union Lane 58 Weston Manor Broadway 10th victory at the Battle of Five Forks cut off the last Confederate Landing City Point National Cemetery Appomattox St 21st Ave 6th HOPEWELL R a Broadway n 15th Ave d o Main St Main lp h Ro supply line, the South Side Railroad. Followed the next day Ave a d 156 10 95 e 156 k riv e R chill D e ur r h E C C n by the final breakthrough assault, Petersburg fell into Union o t t f V s i n I i w W S 295 R Fort Clifton Colonial Heights hands, and resulted in the immediate evacuation of Richmond. X 156 City Park O T T A 36 M O SOUTH SIDE RAILROAD EXTENSION P Oaklawn Boulevard P A City of Hopewell Visitor Center Exit 9 COLONIAL Baylor’s Farm Exit 54 HEIGHTS J e f f Temple Avenue e r s o n P a r k Eastern Front 144 R o Visitor Center FORT LEE a d Battery 5 Violet Bank Puddledock Civil War Rd U.S. Army Women’s Museum 645 Museum U.S. Army Quartermaster Washington St Museum 36 VIRGINIA STATE Fort 36 Siege Encampment Ettrick UNIVERSITY Stedman Exhibit 602 e Meade Station Home Front H Colquitt’s n Picnic i R a iver Ro see detail map at left area L ad Salient r Hickory Hill r 109 is k Road Blandford o c 301 n C r o Exit 52 Church and e e m Cemetery k t ee m tr i n S Wythe Street to D ing The 600 k sh e Wa Crater re C 142 Park Headquarters 1 PETERSBURG c i o d d h a a o o Exit o R R Sycamore St R 50 708 x 460 a r if e l t a n u 85 a H R r t CENTRAL an C n 226 STATE te u Fort HOSPITAL ie L Gowen Monument d Fort Mahone oa Fort Fort SOUTH SIDEx R RAILROAD Whitworth Pennsylvania Co Walker Sedgwick Exit 63 Exit 65 Monument Fork Inn d South Blv Sutherland’s Simp Fort Gregg Battery son Defense Tavern R Fort Lee Road Pegram oad Road W Lee Park Fort Davis e d W Petersburg A.P.
Recommended publications
  • 2020 Arlington Profile
    Department of Community Planning, Housing, and Development PROFILE 2020 2020 Profile 2020 Contents Message from the Director 1 Fast Facts The Profile, an annual statistical fact book of Arlington County, has been produced by the Department of 2 Land Use & Development Community Planning, Housing, and Development 3 Population (CPHD) since 1982. This report combines countywide data and provides a comprehensive outlook of 5 Housing the most current data on population, housing, 7 Households employment, development, transportation, and community services. The Profile data are used to 9 Employment obtain an understanding of our community; for 11 Development planning future services and needs; to guide policy decisions; and to secure grant funding. 13 Schools & Education 15 Multi-Modal Transportation COVID-19 has had an immense impact on our daily lives. Profile 2020 is exceptionally important and 17 Community Services & Resources considered as a benchmark year. Statistics found in 18 Health & Wellness Services this document can be used as a baseline to measure changes that may have occurred since early 2020. 19 Forecast 21 Glossary Profile 2020 continues to include statistics from across departments. New this year, Arlington Public Library statistics highlight the number of library programs, services, and constituents served. Did you know that 47% of Arlington households are active library patrons? Find out more about libraries on page 17. In addition to the Profile 2020 report, an interactive Planning Corridors visualization tool is available Arlington County Vision on the profile webpage (arlingtonva.us/profile) and supports the comparison of demographics across the Rosslyn-Ballston, Richmond Highway, and Columbia “Arlington will be a diverse Pike Corridors with the rest of the County.
    [Show full text]
  • Axis Blitzkrieg: Warsaw and Battle of Britain
    Axis Blitzkrieg: Warsaw and Battle of Britain By Skyla Gabriel and Hannah Seidl Background on Axis Blitzkrieg ● A military strategy specifically designed to create disorganization in enemy forces by logical firepower and mobility of forces ● Limits civilian casualty and waste of fire power ● Developed in Germany 1918-1939 as a result of WW1 ● Used in Warsaw, Poland in 1939, then with eventually used in Belgium, the Netherlands, North Africa, and even against the Soviet Union Hitler’s Plan and “The Night Before” ● Due to the non-aggression pact with the Soviet Union, once the Polish state was divided up, Hitler would colonize the territory and only allow the “superior race” to live there and would enslave the natives. ● On August 31, 1939 Hitler ordered Nazi S.S. troops,wearing Polish officer uniforms, to sneak into Poland. ● The troops did minor damage to buildings and equipment. ● Left dead concentration camp prisoners in Polish uniforms ● This was meant to mar the start of the Polish Invasion when the bodies were found in the morning by Polish officers Initial stages ● Initially, one of Hitler’s first acts after coming to power was to sign a nonaggression pact (January 1934) with Poland in order to avoid a French- Polish alliance before Germany could rearm. ● Through 1935- March 1939 Germany slowly gained more power through rearmament (agreed to by both France and Britain), Germany then gained back the Rhineland through militarization, annexation of Austria, and finally at the Munich Conference they were given the Sudetenland. ● Once Czechoslovakia was dismembered Britain and France responded by essentially backing Poland and Hitler responded by signing a non-aggression with the Soviet Union in the summer of 1939 ● The German-Soviet pact agreed Poland be split between the two powers, the new pact allowed Germany to attack Poland without fear of Soviet intervention The Attack ● On September 1st, 1939 Germany invaded Warsaw, Poland ● Schleswig-Holstein, a German Battleship at 4:45am began to fire on the Polish garrison in Westerplatte Fort, Danzig.
    [Show full text]
  • Indicators of Success and Challenges in Northern Virginia Northern Virginia Is a Diverse, Growing Region with a Well-Educated Population and Strong Economy
    Indicators of Success and Challenges in Northern Virginia Northern Virginia is a diverse, growing region with a well-educated population and strong economy. However, with this success comes challenges such as high CONTENTS housing costs and long commutes that hit low-income residents particularly hard. 1 about the opportunity index The region--Arlington County, Alexandria City, Falls Church City, Fairfax County, 2 general demographics Fairfax City, Loudoun County, Manassas City, Manassas Park City, and Prince William 11 economy County--also continues to be heavily dependent on federal employment, both 19 education directly and through federal contracts. And despite some success in narrowing 25 community health & civic life educational achievement gaps, Black and Hispanic/Latino residents of the region 36 moving forward continue to have higher unemployment and poverty rates, lower household incomes, and lower rates of health insurance access than their non-Hispanic White and Asian peers in the region. In conjunction with the Community ABOUT THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR Foundation’s 40th Anniversary, it NORTHERN VIRGINIA commissioned this report from The Commonwealth Institute to gain some The Community Foundation for Northern Virginia is a visionary perspective on changes and growth in funder that has directed millions of charitable dollars to our region over the past 40 years, and people in need since 1978. Its mission is to grow philanthropy to provide insight into current trends to respond to critical need and seed innovation in our region. that will help guide its future work to Serving all of Northern Virginia, including Arlington, Fairfax, make the greatest impact in responding Loudoun and Prince William Counties and the cities of to critical need and seeding innovation.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline 1864
    CIVIL WAR TIMELINE 1864 January Radical Republicans are hostile to Lincoln’s policies, fearing that they do not provide sufficient protection for ex-slaves, that the 10% amnesty plan is not strict enough, and that Southern states should demonstrate more significant efforts to eradicate the slave system before being allowed back into the Union. Consequently, Congress refuses to recognize the governments of Southern states, or to seat their elected representatives. Instead, legislators begin to work on their own Reconstruction plan, which will emerge in July as the Wade-Davis Bill. [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/reconstruction/states/sf_timeline.html] [http://www.blackhistory.harpweek.com/4Reconstruction/ReconTimeline.htm] Congress now understands the Confederacy to be the face of a deeply rooted cultural system antagonistic to the principles of a “free labor” society. Many fear that returning home rule to such a system amounts to accepting secession state by state and opening the door for such malicious local legislation as the Black Codes that eventually emerge. [Hunt] Jan. 1 TN Skirmish at Dandridge. Jan. 2 TN Skirmish at LaGrange. Nashville is in the grip of a smallpox epidemic, which will carry off a large number of soldiers, contraband workers, and city residents. It will be late March before it runs its course. Jan 5 TN Skirmish at Lawrence’s Mill. Jan. 10 TN Forrest’s troops in west Tennessee are said to have collected 2,000 recruits, 400 loaded Wagons, 800 beef cattle, and 1,000 horses and mules. Most observers consider these numbers to be exaggerated. “ The Mississippi Squadron publishes a list of the steamboats destroyed on the Mississippi and its tributaries during the war: 104 ships were burned, 71 sunk.
    [Show full text]
  • Citizens and Soldiers in the Siege of Yorktown
    Citizens and Soldiers in the Siege of Yorktown Introduction During the summer of 1781, British general Lord Cornwallis occupied Yorktown, Virginia, the seat of York County and Williamsburg’s closest port. Cornwallis’s commander, General Sir Henry Clinton, ordered him to establish a naval base for resupplying his troops, just after a hard campaign through South and North Carolina. Yorktown seemed the perfect choice, as at that point, the river narrowed and was overlooked by high bluffs from which British cannons could control the river. Cornwallis stationed British soldiers at Gloucester Point, directly opposite Yorktown. A British fleet of more than fifty vessels was moored along the York River shore. However, in the first week of September, a French fleet cut off British access to the Chesapeake Bay, and the mouth of the York River. When American and French troops under the overall command of General George Washington arrived at Yorktown, Cornwallis pulled his soldiers out of the outermost defensive works surrounding the town, hoping to consolidate his forces. The American and French troops took possession of the outer works, and laid siege to the town. Cornwallis’s army was trapped—unless General Clinton could send a fleet to “punch through” the defenses of the French fleet and resupply Yorktown’s garrison. Legend has it that Cornwallis took refuge in a cave under the bluffs by the river as he sent urgent dispatches to New York. Though Clinton, in New York, promised to send aid, he delayed too long. During the siege, the French and Americans bombarded Yorktown, flattening virtually every building and several ships on the river.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War Generals Buried in Spring Grove Cemetery by James Barnett
    Spring Grove Cemetery, once characterized as blending "the elegance of a park with the pensive beauty of a burial-place," is the final resting- place of forty Cincinnatians who were generals during the Civil War. Forty For the Union: Civil War Generals Buried in Spring Grove Cemetery by James Barnett f the forty Civil War generals who are buried in Spring Grove Cemetery, twenty-three had advanced from no military experience whatsoever to attain the highest rank in the Union Army. This remarkable feat underscores the nature of the Northern army that suppressed the rebellion of the Confed- erate states during the years 1861 to 1865. Initially, it was a force of "inspired volunteers" rather than a standing army in the European tradition. Only seven of these forty leaders were graduates of West Point: Jacob Ammen, Joshua H. Bates, Sidney Burbank, Kenner Garrard, Joseph Hooker, Alexander McCook, and Godfrey Weitzel. Four of these seven —Burbank, Garrard, Mc- Cook, and Weitzel —were in the regular army at the outbreak of the war; the other three volunteered when the war started. Only four of the forty generals had ever been in combat before: William H. Lytle, August Moor, and Joseph Hooker served in the Mexican War, and William H. Baldwin fought under Giuseppe Garibaldi in the Italian civil war. This lack of professional soldiers did not come about by chance. When the Constitutional Convention met in Philadelphia in 1787, its delegates, who possessed a vast knowledge of European history, were determined not to create a legal basis for a standing army. The founding fathers believed that the stand- ing armies belonging to royalty were responsible for the endless bloody wars that plagued Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • American Armies and Battlefields in Europe 533
    Chapter xv MISCELLANEOUS HE American Battle Monuments The size or type of the map illustrating Commission was created by Con- any particular operation in no way indi- Tgress in 1923. In carrying out its cates the importance of the operation; task of commeroorating the services of the clearness was the only governing factor. American forces in Europe during the The 1, 200,000 maps at the ends of W or ld W ar the Commission erected a ppro- Chapters II, III, IV and V have been priate memorials abroad, improved the placed there with the idea that while the eight military cemeteries there and in this tourist is reading the text or following the volume records the vital part American tour of a chapter he will keep the map at soldiers and sailors played in bringing the the end unfolded, available for reference. war to an early and successful conclusion. As a general rule, only the locations of Ail dates which appear in this book are headquarters of corps and divisions from inclusive. For instance, when a period which active operations were directed is stated as November 7-9 it includes more than three days are mentioned in ail three days, i. e., November 7, 8 and 9. the text. Those who desire more com- The date giYen for the relief in the plete information on the subject can find front Jine of one division by another is it in the two volumes published officially that when the command of the sector by the Historical Section, Army W ar passed to the division entering the line.
    [Show full text]
  • Earthwork Management at Petersburg National Battlefield
    Earthwork Management at Petersburg National Battlefield Dave Shockley Chief, Resource Management Petersburg National Battlefield June, 2000 ******************************************************************************************** TABLE OF CONTENTS ******************************************************************************************** Acknowledgments…….………………………… i Foreword………………………………………... ii Introduction…………………………………….. iii Map of Petersburg National Battlefield…… iv I. Historical Significance A. Earthworks……………………………………….………………………………… 1 B. Archeological Components………………………………………………………... 2 II. Inventory of Existing Earthworks A. Definitions of Earthworks………………………………………………………..… 3 B. Prominent Earthen Structures…..…………………………………………………... 4 C. Engineers Drawings and Current GPS Maps ……………………………………… 6 III. Management Objective……………………….………………………………………….. 23 IV. Conditions/Impacts Affecting Earthworks A. Preservation of Structures and Features………………………………………….… 24 B. Interpretive Values……………………………………………………………….… 33 C. Sustainability……………………………………………………………………..… 34 D. Visitor Accessibility………………………………………………………………... 35 E. Safe Environment…………………………………………………………………... 36 F. Non-historic Resources…………………………………………………………….. 37 G. Additional Issues…………………………………………………………………….38 V. Fundamentals for Earthwork Management at Petersburg National Battlefield A. Tree Removal……………………………………………………………………… 39 B. Erosion Control……………………………………………………………………. 39 C. Seed Selection……………………………………………………………………… 39 D. Hydroseeding…………………………………………………………………….…
    [Show full text]
  • The Law of Victory and the Making of Modern War Robert Sloane Boston Univeristy School of Law
    Boston University School of Law Scholarly Commons at Boston University School of Law Faculty Scholarship 8-22-2013 Book Review of The eV rdict of Battle: The Law of Victory and the Making of Modern War Robert Sloane Boston Univeristy School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the International Humanitarian Law Commons, and the Military, War, and Peace Commons Recommended Citation Robert Sloane, Book Review of The Verdict of Battle: The Law of Victory and the Making of Modern War, No. 13-29 Boston University School of Law, Public Law Research Paper (2013). Available at: https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship/24 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Boston University School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Boston University School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REVIEW OF JAMES Q. WHITMAN, THE VERDICT OF BATTLE: THE LAW OF VICTORY AND THE MAKING OF MODERN WAR (2012) Boston University School of Law Worrking Paper No. 13-39 (August 22, 2013) Robert D. Sloane Boston University Schoool of Law This paper can be downloaded without charge at: http://www.bu.edu/law/faculty/scholarship/workingpapers/2013.html The Verdict of Battle: The Law of Victory and the Making of Modern War. By James Q. Whitman. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012. Pp. vii, 323. Index. For evident reasons, scholarship on the law of war has been a growth industry for the past two decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Arlington Profile 2018
    PROFILE2018 HISTORY ARLINGTON IN THE DC METRO AREA ­ Arlington is an urban county of about 26 square miles located directly across the Potomac River from Washington DC. No MARYLAND 5 C 9 4 A - P incorporated towns or cities lie within I I T Montgomery A L County District of Arlington’s boundaries. B E Y Columbia L A I-295 T W W T Fairfax ­ A Originally part of the area surveyed for L E Y County B I L the nation’s capital, the portion of the - Prince 9 A 5 T I / P Georges I - District on the west bank of the Potomac A 4 C Arlington County 9 Falls 5 River was returned to the Commonwealth I-66 Church of Virginia by the U.S. Congress in 1846. County This area was known as Alexandria City VIRGINIA and Alexandria County until 1920 when RIVER POTOMAC the county portion was renamed Arlington Alexandria I-395 County. Metrorail Stop DEMOGRAPHICS ­ As of January 1, 2018, Arlington had an estimated population of 225,200, reflecting an increase of 8.5% since 2010. On average, Arlington’s population has grown at about 1% per year since 2000. ­ Arlington County population estimates are based on housing unit counts and residential construction activity, which is closely monitored for changes and reported quarterly through the County’s development tracking reports. The U.S. Census Bureau also produces estimates at the county level that are higher due in part to the population migration methodology utilized by the U.S. Census Bureau. Historically, Arlington County’s estimates are closer than the Census Bureau’s estimates to the actual Decennial Census counts.
    [Show full text]
  • “Never Was I So Depressed”
    The Army of Northern Virginia in the Gettysburg Campaign “Never Was I So Depressed” James Longstreet and Pickett’s Charge Karlton D. Smith On July 24, 1863, Lt. Gen. James Longstreet wrote a private letter to his uncle, Augusts Baldwin Longstreet. In discussing his role in the Gettysburg Campaign, the general stated: General Lee chose the plan adopted, and he is the person appointed to chose and to order. I consider it a part of my duty to express my views to the commanding general. If he approves and adopts them it is well; if he does not, it is my duty to adopt his views, and to execute his orders as faithfully as if they were my own. While clearly not approving Lee’s plan of attack on July 3, Longstreet did everything he could, both before and during the attack, to ensure its success.1 Born in 1821, James Longstreet was an 1842 graduate of West Point. An “Old Army” regular, Longstreet saw extensive front line combat service in the Mexican War in both the northern and southern theaters of operations. Longstreet led detachments that helped to capture two of the Mexican forts guarding Monterey and was involved in the street fighting in the city. At Churubusco, Longstreet planted the regimental colors on the walls of the fort and saw action at Casa Marta, near Molino del Ray. On August 13, 1847, Longstreet was wounded during the assault on Chapaltepec while “in the act of discharging the piece of a wounded man." The same report noted that during the action, "He was always in front with the colors.
    [Show full text]
  • The Axis Advances
    wh07_te_ch17_s02_MOD_s.fm Page 568 Monday, March 12, 2007 2:32WH07MOD_se_CH17_s02_s.fm PM Page 568 Monday, January 29, 2007 6:01 PM Step-by-Step German fighter plane SECTION Instruction 2 WITNESS HISTORY AUDIO Objectives Janina’s War Story As you teach this section, keep students “ It was 10:30 in the morning and I was helping my focused on the following objectives to help mother and a servant girl with bags and baskets as them answer the Section Focus Question they set out for the market. Suddenly the high- and master core content. pitch scream of diving planes caused everyone to 2 freeze. Countless explosions shook our house ■ Describe how the Axis powers came to followed by the rat-tat-tat of strafing machine control much of Europe, but failed to guns. We could only stare at each other in horror. conquer Britain. Later reports would confirm that several German Janina Sulkowska in ■ Summarize Germany’s invasion of the the early 1930s Stukas had screamed out of a blue sky and . Soviet Union. dropped several bombs along the main street— and then returned to strafe the market. The carnage ■ Understand the horror of the genocide was terrible. the Nazis committed. —Janina Sulkowska,” Krzemieniec, Poland, ■ Describe the role of the United States September 12, 1939 before and after joining World War II. Focus Question Which regions were attacked and occupied by the Axis powers, and what was life like under their occupation? Prepare to Read The Axis Advances Build Background Knowledge L3 Objectives Diplomacy and compromise had not satisfied the Axis powers’ Remind students that the German attack • Describe how the Axis powers came to control hunger for empire.
    [Show full text]