Waterfront Design Review Panel January 23, 2019 – Block 8 Detailed Design January 23, 2019 West Don Lands – Block 8 Proponent: Dream, Kilmer, Tricon Project Description & Background Design Team: architectsAlliance, Cobe Review Stage: Detailed Design

• Dream, Kilmer and Tricon were the successful proponents of Infrastructure Ontario’s (IO) RFP for Blocks 8, 20, 3W, 4W and 7W in the WDL

• Part of the Province’s Affordable Housing Program as well as the City's Open Doors program

• Block 8 proposed for a purpose built rental building with ancillary retail at-grade and also includes 30% affordable rental housing units

• First purpose-built rental building in the area

• Very tight delivery timeline as per the agreement with IO

• Blocks 3W, 4W, 7W and 20 will follow Block 8

• Blocks 8 and 20 are located east of Cherry St, with Blocks 3W, 4W and 7W located west of Cherry St West Don Lands – Block 8 Site Context Proponent: Dream, Kilmer, Tricon Design Team: architectsAlliance, Cobe Review Stage: Detailed Design

Design Review Area WDL – Block 12 West Don Lands – Block 8 Site Context Proponent: Dream, Kilmer, Tricon Design Team: architectsAlliance, Cobe Review Stage: Detailed Design West Don Lands – Block 8 Site Context Proponent: Dream, Kilmer, Tricon West Don Lands Built Form Design Team: architectsAlliance, Cobe Review Stage: Detailed Design West Don Lands – Block 8 Policy Context – Proponent: Dream, Kilmer, Tricon Design Team: architectsAlliance, Cobe Central Waterfront Secondary Plan Review Stage: Detailed Design

D21_A NEW BEGINNING FOR THE WEST DON LANDS The West Don Lands will be redeveloped into diverse mixed-use communities. These communities will capitalize on their strategic downtown location, the synergy created by the simultaneous development of the Port Lands and their historic roots as part of the original town of York, as well as the Don River’s new environmental health.

(P32) Excellence in the design of public and private buildings, infrastructure (streets, bridges, promenades, etc.) parks and public spaces will be promoted to achieve quality, beauty and worldwide recognition.

(P33) New development will be located, organized and massed to protect view corridors, frame and support the adjacent public realm and discourage privatization of public spaces. Built form will result in comfortable micro- climates on streets, plazas and other parts of the public realm.

(P10) The design of the public realm will be of a standard of excellence characteristic of the great city waterfronts of the world.

(P11) The public realm will be defined by a coherent framework of streets, parks, plazas, buildings, viewing areas, walkways, boardwalks, promenades, piers, bridges and other public infrastructure and open space elements. West Don Lands – Block 8 Project Approval Stage Proponent: Dream, Kilmer, Tricon DRP Stream 2: Private land – Site Plan Approval Design Team: architectsAlliance, Cobe Review Stage: Detailed Design West Don Lands – Block 8 Proponent: Dream, Kilmer, Tricon Recap from September 2018 Design Team: architectsAlliance, Cobe Review Stage: Detailed Design

• Do not extend the retail spine from Tank House Lane along the laneway but focus it on . A small amount of retail related to the streetcar loop should be explored.

• Water feature may not be worth pursuing given the maintenance required

• The use of materials in the public realm requires further refinement

• The usability and accessibility of the podium amenities is successful

• Continuity of the public realm network is strong West Don Lands – Block 8 Proponent: Dream, Kilmer, Tricon New Elements of the Plan Design Team: architectsAlliance, Cobe Review Stage: Detailed Design

• This presentation includes 2 new pedestrian bridge connections joining the buildings; added to the program since the last DRP

• The applicant has indicated the bridges were added to provide better connections to the shared amenity space

• Bridges are +6.75m high from public street level, 18m and 23m in length, and are located over privately owned public space (POPS) West Don Lands – Block 8 Proponent: Dream, Kilmer, Tricon City Planning Issues Design Team: architectsAlliance, Cobe Review Stage: Detailed Design Elevated Pedestrian Bridges: • Views, shadows, perching, ice & snow • Most often reserved for civic uses such as hospitals, etc. • Separates functions

Alignment of Building 8A & 8B with Tank House Lane: • Maintains a visual connection to and from the Distillery district • The conceptual massing in the Precinct Plan show an alignment between the buildings on the north side of Tank House Lane on both sides of Cherry Street • Pinching and reduction of the envisioned open space system • Undulating facades can be achieved without compromising the intended alignment

Historic Cherry Street Switching Tower: • Seamless integration with the re-located Tower on Block 20 • Grades, materials, shared access • Future coordination with City and Metrolinx planned West Don Lands – Block 8 Public and Publicly- Proponent: Dream, Kilmer, Tricon Design Team: architectsAlliance, Cobe Accessible Open Review Stage: Detailed Design Space WEST DON LANDS BLOCK 8

Toronto, Canada Design Review Panel Stage 3 : Design Development Final Draft Plan 01-23-2019

DRAFT

1 Contents

1. DRP 2 Issues / Comments 2. Design Status 3. Facade Materiality 4. Landscape 5. Sustainability DRAFT6. Appendix Issues / Comments DRP 2 DRAFT DRP#2 ISSUES IDENTIFICATION RESPONSE

SEPTEMBER 26, 2018

CONSENSUS COMMENTS

1. Integration of market and affordable units is very positive.

2. Minimizing loading access to one location is supported.

3. Continuity of the public realm network is strong.

4. The usability and accessibility of the podium amenities is successful.

5. Water feature may not be worth pursuing given the maintenance required.

6. Do not extend the retail spine from Tank House Lane along the laneway but focus it on . A small amount of retail related to the streetcar loop should be explored. 7. The use of materialsDRAFT in the public realm requires further refinement.

1 Design Status DRAFT SITE AERIAL VIEW

1. Distillery District

4. 1. 4. Industrial Heritage of Waterfront

2.

2. Canary District DRAFT3.

2 3. Corktown Commons MASSING CONCEPT TAKING INSPIRATION FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD CONCEPT

CONCEPT

CONCEPT 1. CONTINUOUS PODIUM: extending the brick warehouse typology

Warehouse typology 2. CONTINUOUS MIDRISE: reading one coherent materiality between 8A - 8B - 8C Don Valley Shale & Bedrock

DRAFT

Silo typology 3. ICONIC TOWERS: an urban ensemble of unique structures Don Valley 3 3 INDIVIDUAL BUILDINGS - 1 COMBINED PROJECT

DRAFT

4 3 INDIVIDUAL BUILDINGS - 1 COMBINED PROJECT

Parking Garage With One Entry A Continuous Public Space

RETAIL LOBBY / OFFICE AMENITY DRAFTLOADING / STORAGE Bridges Connect Amenity Programs A Cohesive Design in Materials and Massing

5 DIAGRAMMATIC SECTION Building 8C

Building 8B

L8 Amenity Terrace

Building 8A

Bike Parking

L3 Swimming Pool / Amenity

Townhomes L3 Resident Terrace DRAFTPublic-Private Pedestrian Laneway

6 DIAGRAMMATIC SECTION

Building 8C

Building 8B

Building 8A

Courtyard B/C Private Mews Laneway

Courtyard A/B DRAFTPrivate Mews Laneway

7 CENTRALIZED AMENITIES Bridges are important to connect the centralized amenity for all residents / children of affordable and market units.

LEVEL 8 8C OUTDOOR BBQ KITCHEN

8B

8A

CO-WORKING

LEVEL 1

RETAIL URBAN FARMING MUSIC ROOM COMMUNITY THEATER GYM / FITNESS SWIMMING DAYCARE + DRAFTPOOL PLAYGROUND

LEVEL 1 LEVEL 3 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 8 COOPERAGE ST LOOKING NORTH

DRAFT

9 ROLLING MILLS LOOKING NORTH

DRAFT

10 BRIDGE DESIGN DETAILS

400mm 55mm

2500mm

400mm 1370mm 55mm 300mm

Perforated Steel Plate Girder Option Single Web 2500mm

400mm 55mm

1370mm teel andrail

2500mm 4mm 300mm 1370mm mm Perforated Steel Plate Girder Option Perforated teel Single Web 13mm Perforated Steel Plate Girder Option Plate irder 400mm Double Web 3mm 55mm PROJECT: West Don Lands Block 8 SUBJECT: Preliminary Options for Bridge Structural Framing SSK-001 BY: CMM DATE: November 30, 2018 trip uplighting rainage hannel utter now ce hield 2 mm 2500mm

ambered oncrete ec 1370mm DRAFTlipresistant coating Perforated Steel Plate Girder Option Double Web 11 PROJECT: West Don Lands Block 8 SUBJECT: Preliminary Options for Bridge Structural Framing SSK-001 BY: CMM DATE: November 30, 2018 DISTILLERY DISTRICT HISTORICAL RELEVANCE

DRAFT

12 AERIAL VIEW LOOKING SOUTH 8A / 8B BRIDGE CONNECTION

DRAFT

13 GROUND FLOOR

MILL STREET

MILL STREET

3 BD TH RESIDENTIAL ENTRANCE RESIDENTIAL ENTRANCE RESIDENTI AL ENTRA NCE

1 BD TH 1 BD TH

2 BD M 1 B D T H

4 BD 1 BD 1 BD AFFORD1 BD AFFORD1 BD 1 BD 1 BD 1 BD AFFORD1 BD AFFORD134 M2 AFFORD69 M2 AFFORD69 M2 69 M2 69 M2 AFFORD69 M2 AFFORD69 M2 AFFORD69 M2 69 M2

1 BD 69AFFORD M2

1 BD 1 BD 1 BD 1 BD 1 BD 1 BD 1 BD 1 BD 1 BD 4 BD 69M2AFFORD 69M2AFFORD 69M2AFFORD 69M2AFFORD 69M2AFFORD 69M2AFFORD 69M2AFFORD 69M2AFFORD 69M2AFFORD 134AFFORD M2 4 BD TH LOUNGE

LOUNGE / 4 BD TH 1 BD TH 1 BD TH 1 BD TH 1 BD TH 1 BD TH 1 BD TH 1 BD TH 1 BD TH 1 BD TH 93COWORKING m2 BICYCLE GRAND / CO-WORKING 1 BD TH 1 BD TH 1 BD TH 1 BD TH 1 BD TH 1 BD TH 1 BD TH PASSAGE LOBBY

LOBBY BICYCLE RENTAL107 M2 OFFICE RENTAL RE360 M2 SIDE NTIAL PASSAGE BICYCLE

1 BD TH 1 BD TH 1 BD TH 1 BD TH 1 BD TH 1 BD TH 1 BD TH 1 BD TH 1 BD TH PASSBICYCLEAGE

OFFICE LOBBY PASSAGE 371GRAND M2 LOBBY VEHICULA R +0.077.12 FFE LOBBY ENTRANCE

+0.078.07 FFE 1 BD T H

2 BD TH 2 BD TH 2 BD AFFORD85 M2

2 BD 85AFFORD M2

1 BD TH

STORAGESTORAGE14 M2 1 BD 62MARKET M2

14STORAGE M2 UP

SHORT TER M EGRESS CORRIDOR

EGRESS CORRIDOR BIKE PAR KING 1 BD TH

BIKESHORT PARKING TERM 24 SPACES48 M2

FROM ABOVE MARKET1 BD M ANAG EME NT OFFICE 65 M2 SHORT TERM BIKE48 M2 PARKING 24 SPACES SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8

FROM ABOVE

FROM BELOW

FROM ABOVEPKG FROM BELOW 2 BD TH 2 BD TH

SRx4 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx4

2 BD AFFORD80 M2

2 BD 80AFFORD M2 1 BD T H

1 BD 65MARKET M2 PET SPA 12'-2 1/2" 12'-2

MAIL RM & STORAGEPACKAGE NG

MAIL RM & PACKAGESTORAGE DI LOA CE RETAIL373 M2 N TRA SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 1 BD TH 1 BD TH 1 BD TH 1B TH EN

1 BD 1 BD 69AFFORD M2 69AFFORD M2

FROM ABOVE

PET14 SPA M² REQUESTED:9M² (100sf) VE BO RETAIL FROM BELOW GE A

BIKE PARKING 232237 SPACESM2 PET14 SPA M² REQUESTED:9M² (100sf) BRID

BIKE PARKING314 M2 1 BD TH 1 BD TH 27678.07 SPACES FFE 1 BD T H EGRES S CORRIDOR

SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 1 BD 69AFFORD M2

AFFORD1 BD 69 M2 1 BD 65MARKET M2 3B TH

MUSIC40 M² REQUESTED:14M² (150sf) TV VIEWING REQUESTED:68 M² (300-500sf)28-46 M²

TOILETS 18 M² 1 BD TH 1 BD TH SHORT-TE RM BIKE STORAGE 1 BD TH

BIKE STAFF ROOM + WORK /SUPPLY ROOM MAINTAINANCE21 M² REQUESTED:117124 M2M²

MARKET1 BD 1 BD 65 M2 MARKET65 M2 PARKING

SRx4 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8

1 BD TH 1 BD TH 1 BD T H

MARKET1 BD 1 BD 65 M2 MARKET65 M2 1 BD 65MARKET M2

BIKE MAINTAINANCE26 M²

STORAGE88 M2

SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8 SRx8

63 M2 63 AFFORD

PKG BD 1 AIRTO ROOFSHAFT

1 BD TH 1 BD T H 1 BD TH 1 BD TH 1 BD TH 1 BD TH 1 BD TH 1 BD TH 1 BD TH 1 BD TH 1 BD TH 1 BD TH 1 BD TH 1 BD TH 1 BD TH 2 BD TH

ABOVEBRIDGE ABOVEBRIDGE

1 BD 1 BD 2 BD MARKET65 M2 MARKET65 M2 89AFFORD M

1 BD 1 BD BRIDGE MARKET65 M2 65MARKET M2 ABOVE

1 BD 1 BD MARKET65 M2 65MARKET M2

1 BD 1 BD MARKET65 M2 MARKET65 M2 2 BD TH 2 BD TH 4 BD TH

1 BD 1 BD MARKE65 M2T MARKET65 M2 2 BD T H

4 BD 2 BD TH 116AFFORD M2

1 BD 1 BD MARKET65 M2 65MARKET M2 2 BD TH 2 BD 89AFFORD M2

2 BD TH 2 BD 85MARKET M2

2 BD 85MARKET M2

RETAIL48 M2 RETAIL 2 BD TH

2 BD MARKET85 M2

2 BD MARKET85 M2

1 BD SUITE UNDER MARKET71 M2 DEVELOPMENT

2 BD MARKET85 M2

2 BD 3 BD TH MARKET85 M2

3 BD 91AFFORD M2

DEVELOPMENTSUITE UNDER

AVERAGEBLOCK 8A GRADE = +76.90 M AVERAGEBLOCK 8B GRADE = +77.783 M

RETAIL AMENITY MARKET AFFORDABLE

1BR 1BR

2BR 2BR

3BR 3BR DRAFT 4BR

15 L-PARKING 8A, 8B, 8C

1. Copyright of this drawing is reserved by the Architect. The drawing and all associated documents are an instrument of service by the Architect. The drawing and the information contained therein may not be reproduced in whole or in part without prior written permission of the Architect.

2. These Contract Documents are the property of the Architect. The Architect bears no responsibility for the interpretation of these documents by the Contractor. Upon written application, the Architect will provide written/graphic clarification or supplementary information regarding the intent of the Contract Documents. The Architect will review Shop Drawings submitted by the Contractor for design conformance only.

3. Drawings are not to be scaled for construction. The Contractor is to verify all existing conditions and dimensions required to perform the work and report any discrepancies with the Contract Documents to the Architect before commencing any work.

4. Positions of exposed finished mechanical or electrical devices, fittings, and fixtures are indicated on architectural drawings. The locations shown on the architectural drawings govern over the Mechanical and Electrical drawings. Those items not clearly located will be located as directed by the Architect.

5. These drawings are not to be used for construction unless noted below as "Issuance: For Construction"

6. All work is to be carried out in conformance with the Code and Bylaws of the authorities having jurisdiction.

7. The Architect of these plans and specifications gives no warranty or representation to any party about the constructability of the building(s) represented by them. All contractors or subcontractors must satisfy themselves when bidding and at all times ensure that they can properly construct the work represented by these plans.

© architectsAlliance, 2017

NO ISSUANCE DATE

1 ISSUED FOR SPA 10.31.2018 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

BLOCK 8 PROPERTY LINE 9 RES STOR AGE LOCKER S SU B ELEC MECH R M 'C' MECH R M 'C' STOR MWATER MANAGEMENT TANK MECH R M 'B' R M 'A'

MAIN BU LK R M GAR BAGE RM TYPE C MAIN ELEC R M TEL/TV LOADING R M UP UP UP BIK E GAR BAGE VEST. MOVING GAR BAGE RM UP STOR AGE R M R M TYPE C MOVING MOVING LOADING CAR SHAR E SU B ELEC

BLOCK 8 PROPERTY LINE BLOCK 8 PROPERTY R M 'A' SU B ELEC UP CAR SHAR E ROOM B BU LK R M

R ESIDENTIAL CONTROL GATE TYPE C LOADING

AIR SHAFT

KNOCK-OUT PANEL

BLOCK 8 BLOCK 20 KNOCK-OUT PANEL 205-317 Adelaide St. West Toronto, Ontario M5V 1P9 TU R NING SPACE t 416 593 6500 K NOCK-OUT PANEL BLOCK 8 f 416 593 4911

BLOCK 20 info: architectsalliance.com

COBE ApS

Pakhus 54 Orientkaj 4, st. 2150 Nordhavn Denmark

t +45 3254 4300 [email protected]

BLOCK 20 PROPERTY LINE

N

WDL DRAFT 8 LP

16

P1

1:312.50

2018-12-19 A-1.1 FLOOR PLANS

1 BD 1 BD

1 BD

1 BD

4 BD 2 BD 2 BD 2 BD 2 BD 2 BD 2 BD 1 BD 3 BD 3 BD 1 BD 2 BD 2 BD 2 BD 2 BD 2 BD 2 BD 4 BD 4 BD 1 BD 1 BD 1 BD 1 BD

1 BD

2 BD 2 BD 2 BD 2 BD 2 BD GYM 2 BD

3 BD OUTDOOR 1 BD 1 BD 2 BD 2 BD 1 BD 4 BD 2 BD 1 BD 2 BD AREA & CRECHE STORAGE 2 BD STORAGE

2 BD

LEVEL 3 AMENITY

2 BD 1 BD 1 BD

3 BD 1 BD 1 BD 1 BD 1 BD CATERING 1 BD 1 BD 1 BD 2 BD / DINING CATERING / DINING / KITCHENETTE / BF WC / MUSIC RM

1 BD AMENITY MARKET AFFORDABLE CATERING 1 BD 1 BD / DINING

LOUNGE 2 BD 1 BD 1 BD LOUNGE 1 BD 1 BD 2 BD / CO-WORKING 1BR 1BR / CO-WORKING / GAMES / GAMES 2 BD 2BR 2BR

3BR 3BR

4BR

LEVEL 8 AMENITY

1 BD 1 BD 1 BD MARKET MARKET MARKET 54 M2 52 M2 1 BD 3 BD 64 M2 MARKET MARKET 1 BD 1 BD 2 BD 1 BD 1 BD 3 BD 1 BD 1 BD 3 BD 1 BD 1 BD 2 BD 50 M2 95 M2 MARKET MARKET AFFORD AFFORD MARKET MARKET MARKET AFFORD MARKET MARKET MARKET AFFORD 56 M2 57 M2 80 M2 57 M2 56 M2 80 M2 56 M2 57 M2 80 M2 57 M2 55 M2 80 M2

2 BD 2 BD AFFORD MARKET 73 M2AMENITY MARKET82 M2 AFFORDABLE 1 BD MARKET 2 BD 44 M2 AFFORD 2 BD 1 BD 1 BD 1 BD 1 BD 2 BD 1 BD 72 M2 1 BD 1 BD 1 BD 1 BD 2 BD 1BR 1BR 2 BD MARKET MARKET MARKET MARKET MARKET AFFORD AFFORD MARKET MARKET MARKET MARKET AFFORD MARKET 67 M2 43 M2 43 M2 43 M2 44 M2 66 M2 59 M2 43 M2 43 M2 43 M2 44 M2 66 M2 67 M2 2 BD MARKET 84 M2 2BR 2BR

3BR 3BR DRAFT 4BR

TYPICAL TOWER LEVEL 17

MARKET AFFORDABLE

1BR 1BR

2BR 2BR

3BR 3BR

4BR TANK HOUSE LANE ALIGNMENT

CURRENT DESIGN ALIGNED MASSING

DRAFT

18 TANK HOUSE LANE ALIGNMENT

CURRENT DESIGN ALIGNED MASSING

CURRENT DESIGN ALIGNED MASSING DRAFT

19 TANKHOUSE LANE

DRAFT

20 Facade Materiality DRAFT A VIBRANT ARCHITECTURAL NEIGHBORHOOD INSPIRATIONAL COLLAGE

8A 8B 8C 8A 8B 8C

20 20

Distillery District DRAFTCanary District Industrial Heritage Corktown Commons of Toronto Waterfront

21 CARVED GEOLOGY MATERIAL CONCEPT 8A/8B/8CBLOCK 8C

TOWER - The Silo TOWER - River Transparency iver ransparencyLight ight

MIDRISE - The Brick Grid PODIUM - Shale / Bedrock Carving hale Heavy edrock arving eavy

PODIUM - Brick Warehouse

DRAFT8A + 8B 8C

22 MATERIALS, COLOR AND FINISH SAMPLES

BASE - 8A / 8B MID-RISE - 8A/8B/8C + BASE - 8C TOWER - 8A / 8B TOWER - 8C MEDIUM IRONSPOT BRICK MEDIUM IRONSPOT SMOOTH BRICK SANDBLASTED PRECAST CONCRETE SANDBLASTED PRECAST CONCRETE

IN-PROGRESS

DRAFT

DISTILLERY - BRICK BASE CANARY - GRID + INFILL DON LANDS INDUSTRY CORKTOWN COMMON

23 DRAFT

24 ENLARGED FACADE ELEVATION CHERRY ST MATERIAL LEGEND

3 Tower / L8-L16

1. Aluminum-Frame Window Wall with Sliding Glass Doors 1 Integrated Louvers

2 2. 1” IGU with Low-E Coating on Surface #2

4 3. Precast Assembly

4. Aluminum Window Box Frame

Mid-Rise / L3-L7

6 5. Aluminum-Frame Window Wall with Sliding Glass Doors Integrated Louvers

6. 1” IGU with Low-E Coating on Surface #2

7 7. Modular Face Brick, Ironspot Smooth Finish

8. Bird Friendly Frit

Base / L1-L2 5 9. Aluminum Curtain Wall Framing Structurally Glazed Silicone joints

10. Solid Steel Panel Townhome Entry Doors 8 11. Low-Iron Glazing with Low-E Coating on Surface #2, 100x100 Ceramic Bird Frit Surface #3 11 12. Hand-Laid Brick Masonry, Ironspot Hand Mould Finish 13 9 13. Glazed Storefront Entry Doors

12

85% Bird Frit DRAFT

25 DRAFT

26 PODIUM - BRICK WAREHOUSE BLOCK 8A + 8B LEVELS 1-2

DRAFTInterior Perspective Unit Axon

27 PODIUM - BRICK WAREHOUSE BLOCK 8A + 8B LEVELS 1-2

450 923 3250 230 6700 4050

DRAFT450 3175 6350

28 MIDRISE - BRICK GRID BLOCK 8A + 8B LEVELS 3-7

DRAFTUnit Interior Perspective Unit Axon

29 MIDRISE - BRICK GRID BLOCK 8A and 8B LEVELS 3-7

600 600 600 600 600 385

450

1670 2950 2950 2950

2350 2320 2250 2350 2320 2250 2350 2350 2350 2320 2250 2350 2350 1100 1100

1000 1000 1000 965 600 4065 600

2000

12° 600 465 600 DRAFT1710 4040 600 1710

30 TOWER - THE SILO BLOCK 8A and 8B LEVELS 8-16

DRAFTUnit Interior Perspective Unit Axon

31 TOWER - THE SILO BLOCK 8A and 8B LEVELS 8-16

700 700 3175 700 700 DRAFT4575

32 AERIAL VIEW LOOKING SOUTH 8A / 8B PODIUM

DRAFT

33 BLOCK 8C LOOKING EAST ON MILL

DRAFT

34 8C FROM AIR V

DRAFT

35 GROUND FLOOR ELEVATIONS BLOCK 8C

1 1 Glazed Curtain Wall 4 6 2 Hand-laid Brick Masonry

3 Prefinished Aluminum Panel

4 Glazed Balcony Guard

5 Aluminum Frame Window Wall W/ Sliding Glass Doors; Integrated Louvers 5 6 Aluminum Feature

4

3

DRAFT2 1

36 PODIUM TOWNHOUSE BLOCK 8C LEVELS 1-2

Interior Perspective DRAFT

37 PODIUM DETAIL BLOCK 8C LEVELS 1-2

EXTERIOR GLAZED RESIDENTIAL ALUM. WINDOW

PRE-FINISHED 3mm ALUM. PANEL WATERPROOF MEMBRANE ON BRICK FACED PRECAST EXTERIOR SHEATHING / PROTECTION BOARD PANEL BEHIND ADJUSTABLE GIRTS and/or STEEL STUD FRAMING AS REQUIRED 75mm RIGID INSULATION WATERPROOF MEMBRANE CONCRETE SLAB CONT. ALUM. CLOSURE (SEE STRUCTURAL DWGS) FASTENED TO FRAME 920 (BY WINDOW WALL MFR.)

INTERIOR Slope SUITE

CONCRETE CURB 150

125 75 795 150

PRE-FINISHED EXTRUDED ALUMINUM CHANNEL SECURED TO CONCRETE SLAB BEHIND 75mm RIGID/SEMI-RIGID INSULATION AIR/VAPOUR BARRIER CONCRETE SLAB (SEE STRUCTURAL DWGS) CAULKING

SEALANT (TYPICAL) INTERIOR SUITE

DASHED LINE INDICATES PRECAST JOINT SEALANT 13mm GYPSUM WALL BOARD BEYOND VAPOUR BARRIER 92mm STEEL STUDES PRECAST CONC. SUPPORT MINERAL BATT INSULATION (SEE MFR. DWGS) PRECAST PANEL (AIR BARRIER)

MODULAR THIN BRICK 125 225 FACED PRECAST PANEL SECURED TO CONCRETE SLAB ABOVE 350

EXTERIOR DRAFT

38 MIDRISE BLOCK 8C LEVELS 3-7

DRAFT

39 MIDRISE DETAIL BLOCK 8C LEVELS 3-7

EXTERIOR GLAZED RESIDENTIAL ALUM. WINDOW

PRE-FINISHED 3mm ALUM. PANEL WATERPROOF MEMBRANE ON EXTERIOR SHEATHING / PROTECTION BOARD BRICK FACED PRECAST ADJUSTABLE GIRTS and/or STEEL STUD FRAMING AS REQUIRED PANEL BEHIND 75mm RIGID INSULATION WATERPROOF MEMBRANE CONT. ALUM. CLOSURE CONCRETE SLAB FASTENED TO FRAME (SEE STRUCTURAL DWGS) (BY WINDOW WALL MFR.) 920 135 90

INTERIOR Slope SUITE

CONCRETE CURB 150 150

125 75 795 150 200

PRE-FINISHED EXTRUDED ALUMINUM CHANNEL SECURED TO CONCRETE SLAB BEHIND 75mm RIGID/SEMI-RIGID INSULATION AIR/VAPOUR BARRIER CONCRETE SLAB (SEE STRUCTURAL DWGS) CAULKING 100

INTERIOR SUITE PRE-FINISHED ALUMINUM PANEL SOFFIT CONTINUOUS PERFORATED ALUM. SYSTEM SUPPORTED FROM CONCRETE SLAB PANEL BAND TO MATCH WINDOW ABOVE w/ ADJUSTABLE GIRTS and/or STEEL FRAME, w/ BIRD SCREEN AS BRICK FACED PRECAST STUD FRAMING AS REQUIRED REQUIRED BY WINDOW WALL MFR. P01C PANEL BEHIND 100mm RIGID/SEMI-RIGID INSULATION MIN. 50% FREE OPENING AREA AIR/VAPOUR BARRIER

WITH SOLID MARGINS 300 CONCRETE SLAB (REFER TO MECHANICAL DWG) (REFER TO STRUCTURAL DWGS) INSULATED ALUM. MATTE BLACK PRE-FINISHED BACK PAN. ALUMINUM PANEL CLOSURE CONTINUOUS PERIMETER SEAL

DRYWALL EXTERIOR BULKHEAD BEYOND

DRAFTGLAZED RESIDENTIAL ALUM. WINDOW

40 TOWER BLOCK 8C LEVELS 8-26

DRAFT

41 TOWER DETAIL BLOCK 8C LEVELS 8-26

INTERIOR EXTERIOR INTERIOR 28 15 15 VAR.

191 EXTERIOR 191

VAR. 19 19 34

13 42 65 75 INTERIOR 300 238

INTERIOR VAR.

EXTERIOR 13 92 VAR. 125 28

OPTION I: PRECAST DRAFTSECTION DETAILS SCALE : 1/5

42 Landscape DRAFT PUBLIC REALM MATERIALITY GREEN FROM CANARY DISTRICT HARD SURFACES FROM DISTILLERY

DRAFT

43 MASTERPLAN WITHMASTERPLAN FIRE ROUTE - With Fire Route

DRAFT

44 PHASE 1 - GROUND LEVEL HARD SURFACES + TREES

Glen Leven Linden Black Locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) Honeylocust (Gleditsia triacanthos) Tulip Tree (Liriodendron tulipifera), London Plane Tree (Tilia flavescens “Glenleven”) Four Seasons Hotel, Toronto, CC+A Lincoln Centre, NYC (Platanus acerifolia)

2 2 3

1 DRAFT NOT TO SCALE

1 WHITACRE GREER – BOARDWALK CLAY PAVERS (KING PORTLAND CENTRE) 2 BELDEN EMBOSSED CLAY BRICK 3 PALEOTEC PRECAST CONCRETE PAVERS

45 GROUND FLOOR AND PUBLIC REALM SECTIONAL RELATIONSHIPS

Tram Loop Plaza Retail Mill Street Townhomes Mill Street / Rolling Mills Residential Entrance

DRAFTCooperage Street Townhomes 8C Mill Street Townhomes Cherry Street Retail

46 EDGE CONDITION - TOWNHOUSES

MILL ST. DRAFTTANKHOUSE LANE

47 COURTYARD A/B

SUSTAINABILITY FEATURES Soil volume and depth Soil connectivity Porosity and infiltration >50% indigenous species Continuous canopy enclosure for albedo adjustment TOTAL SOIL VOLUME: 395 M3 14 TREES: 28 M3 PER TREE DRAFT

48 COURTYARD B/C

SUSTAINABILITY FEATURES Soil volume and depth Soil connectivity Porosity and infiltration >50% indigenous species Continuous canopy enclosure for albedo adjustment TOTAL SOIL VOLUME: 370 M3 17 TREES: 22 M3 PER TREE DRAFT

49 8A - L3 COMMUNITY GARDEN ROOF

UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT

DRAFT SEDUM EXTENSIVE GREEN ROOF FLOWERING CRABAPPLE (Malus ‘Makamik’) PASTURE ROSE (Rosa Carolina) SMOOTH ROSE (Rosa Blanda) GRO-LOW FRAGRANT SUMAC Esplanade du Palais des Congrès, Montreal, CC+A (Rhus Aromatica)

50 8B - L3 ACTIVE RECREATION ROOF

DRAFT STAGHORN SUMAC, Rhus typhina BLACK AND WHITE UMBRELLA POOL TILE, WHITE 5-7 The Esplanade, Toronto, CC+A

51 8A - L3 COMMUNITY GARDEN ROOF

BUILDING 8B - VIEW LOOKING SOUTH WEST

BUILDING 8A - VIEW LOOKING EAST TOWARDS BUILDING 8B DRAFT

52 8A + 8B AL FRESCO LOUNGE ROOF

DRAFT SMALL TREES + LUSH GROUNDCOVER TRUMPET VINE Monks Garden, MVVA (Campsis radicans)

53 8C AL FRESCO LOUNGE ROOF

DRAFT

54 8B AL FRESCO LOUNGE ROOF

8B AMENITY DECK AERIAL 8B AMENITY DECK PERSPECTIVE DRAFT

55 Sustainability DRAFT SUSTAINABILITY

Solar Wall Technology Efficient Magnetic-Bearing Pre-Heated Fresh Air Intake Centrifgual Chillers

Low Window-to-Wall Ratio (50%) Precast panels Self Shading Facade

In-Suite Heat Recovery

Low-Flow Hot Water Fixtures Green Roofs

LED fixtures in corridors, Native Plant Species amenity areas and garage

Locally Sourced Materials Urban Farming

Bike Parking

City Tram Connection

Storm Water Retention DRAFT

56 ENERGYENERGY PERFORMANCE PERFORMANCE – INITIAL- INITIAL GOALS GOALS VS. VS. CURRENT CURRENT ACHIEVEMENTS ACHIEVEMENTS

Currently meeting or exceeding all of the initial energy goals we established at the beginning of the project:

Program / Standard Requirement / Initial Goal Current Site-wide Performance

LEED v4 NC, Gold At least a 5% cost improvement over NECB 2011 Expecting a 26% - 30% cost improvement

CMHC 15% better than NECB 2015 29% better than NECB 2015

TGS Tier 1 15% better than NECB 2015 SB-10 2017 27% better than NECB 2015 OBC’s SB-10

Energy Use Intensity Max 170 kWh/m2/yr 150 kWh/m2/yr

GHG Intensity Max 20 kgCO2e/m2/yr 18 kgCO2e/m2/yr

Current energy savings are primarily the result of: • Envelope: relatively low window to wall ratio (~50%), and precast wall panels instead of window wall with spandrel panels • High-performance glazing selection: Double-glazed IGUs with Low-e coating, argon gas, and thermally broken frames • Green roof with enhanced thermal performance (R-30) • In-suite heat recovery ventilation units with at least 55% sensible heat recovery effectiveness • Variable speed drives in primary pumps and fans • Highly efficient magnetic-bearing centrifugal chillers • Condensing boilers for space & DHW heating, including for heating corridor rooftop units • Low-flow hot water fixtures • High-efficacy LED fixtures in at least corridors, amenity areas, and the parking garage DRAFT 1

57 ENERGYENERGY PERFORMANCE PERFORMANCE – INITIAL- INITIAL GOALS GOALS VS. VS. CURRENT CURRENT ACHIEVEMENTS ACHIEVEMENTS

A breakdown by building has also been completed to get a higher resolution of energy end use. Block C

The team is also currently undergoing feasibility assessments for Block B renewable energy systems, including SolarWall and Enwave, described Block A on the following slides.

DRAFT 2

58 SOLAR WALL - BLOCK 8A & 8B SOLARWALL FOR BLOCKS 8A & 8B

The feasibility of installing SolarWall systems to preheat the corridor ventilation using solar energy is being explored. The mechanical penthouses of Blocks 8A and 8B are under consideration for the solar collector locations.

While the energy and cost-saving potential of the SolarWall system is dependent on the size of collector and the volume of air supplied to the corridors, the feasibility study suggests: SolarWall System • Potential energy reduction of 5%-7% below current proposed energy use for each of Blocks 8A and 8B – a 3% site-wide energy reduction

• Potential for additional 1 LEED point

DRAFTPossible SolarWall Collector Location

3 59 ENWAVE POSSIBILITIES ENWAVE POSSIBILITIES

The feasibility of a district energy system for the West Don Lands is being assessed in collaboration with Enwave. For Block 8, this district energy system could mean:

• Shared thermal energy demand among other buildings in the district, reducing overall energy use

• Reduced carbon emissions through heat pump-based solution

• Resilient design of on-site electrical generation HW to buildings

Boost Extra Heat Boiler Rejection Fluid Cooler Boost Electricity to Co-Gen grid / plant

HR HX ChW to Chiller buildings

Geo-Exchange

Possible District Energy System DRAFTConfiguration for West Don Lands 4

60 PRELIMINARYPRELIMINARY LEED LEED SCORECARD SCORECARD Total Available Points: 110 Legend: D: Documented Points Required for Gold: 60 Y: Targeted Points Currently Targeted: 66 ?: Possible / Not Yet Determined N: Not Targeted

DRAFT 5

61 Thank you!

Thank you! DRAFT

62