ATTACHMENTS TO VARIOUS REPORTS COUNCIL MEETING
MONDAY 25 FEBRUARY 2013
ATTACHMENT TO CM 9A – 02/2013
ALBURY REGIONAL ART GALLERY REDEVELOPMENT – FUNDING OPTIONS
ATTACHMENT 1 – 9A
Council Report 26 November 2012 – Albury Regional Art Gallery Redevelopment Funding Options
AlburyCity - Council Meeting AGENDA
10D Albury Regional Art Gallery Redevelopment – Funding Options (DOC12/108935)
DATE 16 November 2012
CONFIDENTIAL YES NO If yes please tick one of the following reasons Personnel Matters Commercial Legal Security Personal Hardship
ITEM FOR DECISION ITEM FOR NOTING Meeting Date Monday 26 November 2012 Meeting Date
FURTHER ENQUIRIES TO Michael Keys PHONE 6023 8111 Acting General Manager
Background
The Albury Regional Art Gallery Redevelopment Project is a significant project for AlburyCity and the surrounding region due to the potential to provide a major cultural asset and the associated benefits to our existing and future residents, visitors and those engaged in the arts and cultural industries across our region and beyond.
This project has been the subject of a number of reports to Council both as part of the Cultural Precinct Masterplan and as a stand-alone project in its own right. A copy of the most recent report presented to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 23 July 2012 is included (Attachment 1).
The Federal Government through the Regional Development Australia Fund (RDAF) recognised and supported this project with funding of $3.5 million approved under the RDAF program in Round 2. This is a significant commitment and recognition of the importance, value and potential outcomes of this project.
The funding compliments AlburyCity’s commitment of $3.5 million to the project but does not account for and at this point in time cannot assure a further commitment and partnership from the NSW State Government.
This project was presented to and endorsed by Council based on a shared contribution across all tiers of government. Despite significant attempts by both Council and our local State member, Greg Aplin MP, the NSW State Government is unable to support this project at this time.
This report details the options available to Council to fund and complete the Albury Regional Art Gallery Redevelopment Project based on the confirmed funding arrangements.
Council Meeting – Monday 26 November 2012 58 AlburyCity - Council Meeting AGENDA
Issues
The Albury Regional Art Gallery Redevelopment Project, estimated at a value of $10.5 million, was one of a number of projects presented and approved by the community, Council and IPART under a Special Application to Vary Rate Income (SVR) in 2010. This was based on a tri-partite funding commitment across all three levels of government, being $3.5 million each.
The Federal Government has been extremely supportive and approved funding through RDAF Round 2 for construction of the project. The NSW State Government committed funds to initial design concepts, business case analysis and market research specifically for this project.
Since July there has been considerable effort made to engage the NSW Government in relation to the funding of the Gallery Redevelopment. This has included personal representations to The Hon. George Souris (Minister for Tourism, Major Events, Hospitality and Racing, and the Arts), who also visited the gallery in March 2012, and the office of The Hon. Andrew Stoner (Deputy Premier, Minister for Trade and Investment, and Minister for Regional Infrastructure and Services).
The Mayor of AlburyCity and the local State Member, Greg Aplin, MP, have actively sought audiences with the Hon. Barry O'Farrell (Premier and Minister for Western Sydney) but without success. This project has been recognised by Federal and State Government representative organisations as being significant, and a priority project for the region.
There has been strong and considerable support from the local member Greg Aplin MP throughout this campaign.
In addition the Federal Minister for Regional Development, Simon Crean has been an active and vocal supporter of the project. Minister Crean recently attended the Albury Regional Art Gallery and extolled the virtues of the project and since that time his office has also campaigned on our behalf with the NSW Deputy Premier.
Only recently Cr Henk van de Ven whilst attending the recent Local Government Arts and Culture Summit made further representation on the project to the Executive Director of Arts NSW.
At all times and in all avenues of parliament the Albury Regional Art Gallery Redevelopment Project has been applauded and in most cases supported. In all our submissions Council has been open to alternative funding arrangements, such as staged funding over two years, delaying the funding for one year due to State fiscal pressures and reduced levels of available funding.
Unfortunately at the time of writing this report the NSW Government have stated that they will not provide any funding for this project (Attachment 2 – Correspondence from the Deputy Premier the Hon. Andrew Stoner MP). It is considered that Council should continue to lobby the NSW State Government for a contribution towards funding of this project over the next two years.
Council Meeting – Monday 26 November 2012 59 AlburyCity - Council Meeting AGENDA
The State Government has recently announced the second round of ‘Local Infrastructure Renewal Scheme” (LIRS) funding program. This program provides an interest subsidy to Councils of approximately 3% on a loan and is designed to assist with the provision of local infrastructure. The second round of funding is open for Expressions of Interest until 31 December 2012 but a decision will not be made on successful projects until mid-May 2013. As highlighted by the Deputy Premier, the project would meet program guidelines and reduce borrowing costs for the additional $3.5 million.
Under the provisions of the funding offer from the Federal Government a response confirming the funding arrangements was required at the end of October. This was extended whilst Council sought the support of the State Government. During this time further discussions were held with the Federal Government regarding the particulars of their funding proposal. This included delaying the project to enable further consideration by the State Government in the next budget and seeking alternative funding arrangements such as private sector donations or contributions. The department has indicated that whilst they are willing to consider a minor delay (2-3 months) in terms of their deadline for the commencement and completion of the project, they will not consider any major change in the project timelines whilst further representations are made to the NSW Government. They have also clearly stated that no further funds are available from the Federal Government for this project.
The scope of the project and the works involved require a project schedule of approximately 2.5 years. To meet the funding deadline of completion of the project by March 2015 it is imperative that a decision to commit to this project be made in the immediate future. A delay may have significant impacts on the project schedule and, as a result, federal government funding.
The SVR includes 16 projects that have been scheduled to enable project management and funding arrangements over the program period. The Albury Regional Art Gallery Redevelopment Project was originally scheduled to commence in 2016-17. The availability of the RDAF funding has fast tracked this project which can be accommodated in Council’s long term plan with rescheduling in the funding arrangements and program of works of the SVR suite of projects.
Given the facts presented above the following primary options are available to Council for funding the outstanding $3.5 million for this project:
1. Council fund the outstanding $3.5 million via cash from reserves and manages the impost within existing budget parameters and constraints. OR 2. Council take out a standard market loan for the additional $3.5 million, possibly complimented by a Local Infrastructure Renewal Scheme (LIRS) loan subsidy of 3% per annum.
From a conservative financial perspective the funding of this project by either of these options can be achieved without affecting Council’s medium to long term financial objective to achieve a surplus or break even operating position. Based on assessments of Council’s long term financial plan there is the capacity for Council to have a higher level of loan funding whilst remaining within the good category for the Division of Local Government’s Debt Service Ratio benchmarks (below 10%).
Council Meeting – Monday 26 November 2012 60 AlburyCity - Council Meeting AGENDA
It is acknowledged that adjustments will need to be made to the timing of other SVR projects and the New Initiatives program over future years to accommodate this project. Council will also need to continue its program of service and efficiency reviews and build on the progress achieved to date. The option of using cash reserves, loan funding or a combination of both should be determined taking into account a range of variables including the timing of the need for cash, the requirements of the application process for the LIRS, the requirements negotiated as part of the funding deed with the Federal Government, the suitability of this project compared to other projects under consideration for loan funding and other financial factors. These factors are best examined and a decision on the method of funding determined at the time that the funds are needed by Council.
Under all of these options there would be an underlying commitment that Council seek any additional capital funding for this project, especially through the State Government, over the project time period.
Alternative Funding Options
The funding of arts and cultural facilities are not solely the domain of governments across Australia. There are many philanthropic organisations and institutions that support and provide funding for facilities such as art galleries or major regional cultural facilities. Therefore the opportunity exists for the Albury Regional Art Gallery Redevelopment Project to pursue alternative funding sources for this project.
It is proposed to establish a working party of Council to fully investigate all philanthropic and alternative fundraising for the gallery and its collection. The working party would be responsible for the development and implementation of a fundraising strategy (including budget and fundraising targets), galvanising community support, assisting in lobbying efforts and regularly reporting to Council regarding progress.
Following discussions with the Australia Business Arts Foundation (ABAF), an organisation specifically established to support fundraising activities; it is considered a realistic expectation that Council can achieve substantial non government funding support for this project. However it is unwise to forecast the level of external support that could be achieved by this effort until detailed investigation is undertaken. It must be stressed that the development of a well structured coordinated fundraising and communications strategy will be the key to the success of this initiative.
To effectively organise and support this proposal it is proposed that a working party of Council be established, tentatively titled Building for the Future - Albury Regional Art Gallery. The working party would have the following representation:
The Mayor, The Councillor representative on the Cultural Precinct Advisory Committee, A nominated representative of the Albury Wodonga Art Foundation, A nominated representative from the Friends of the Albury Regional Art Gallery, A nominated representative from the Chamber of Commerce, A nominated representative from Regional Development Australia – Murray, A nominated representative from Murray Regional Tourism,
Council Meeting – Monday 26 November 2012 61 AlburyCity - Council Meeting AGENDA
CEO Museums and Galleries Association of NSW, A leading local person who would champion the project and be the public face for the fundraising group, and Albury City staff representation including the General Manager, Director Community and Recreation, Group Leader Cultural Services and the Group Leader Communications.
The committee would also have the ability to second individuals as needed to the committee.
Advice from ABAF strongly supports the appointment of an external spokesperson for the group. This person would coordinate and represent the project to benevolent organisations and other parties as and when required.
The sourcing of philanthropic funding is an important aspect of this project but requires suitable and appropriate resourcing, research and preparation to ensure professional submissions and representations are made to suitable and appropriate organisations. The sourcing of philanthropic funding had been planned to expand the art gallery collection in the redeveloped gallery but in light of current funding options it is proposed that this be brought forward and also utilised for the capital works.
It is a realistic expectation that Council proceed with one of the primary funding options listed earlier in this report and adjust future budget estimates to account for the level of success achieved via the additional fundraising. This can be managed via the quarterly budget reviews during 2012-13 and in the consideration of the 2013-14 and 2014-15 budgets.
Alignment with Federal, State and Local Government Strategic Frameworks
This project has the support of a significant and diverse range of individuals and organisations. It also aligns with a range of NSW State Government and AlburyCity plans. Supporters include Regional Development Australia Murray, the Riverina and Murray Regional Organisation of Councils (RAMROC), Murray Regional Tourism and Wodonga City Council, who have identified the project as one of significance and a regional priority. The local Chambers of Commerce also support the project, representing more than 450 local businesses. Local and state cultural industry bodies together with local arts industry bodies also support the project.
In relation to the strategic objectives in NSW 2021, this project clearly supports and embraces those objectives.
The State Plan also provides the following goals that are more specifically aligned to this project:
Stronger Communities – increase participation in the arts and cultural activity; Supporting Business and Jobs – Increase tourism in NSW to 160 million visitor nights by 2015- 16; and Better Transport and Liveable Cities – Grow Cities and centres as functional and attractive places to work and live and increase the number of jobs closer to home and also the NSW Government Communities.
Council Meeting – Monday 26 November 2012 62 AlburyCity - Council Meeting AGENDA
Arts NSW Corporate Plan 2010-2012 provides the following goal “The arts and cultural sector is strong and innovative, and the creative industries continue to grow”.
The recently released NSW State Infrastructure Strategy clearly recognises the value and potential of projects such as the Art Gallery Redevelopment. Relevant recommendations and findings include:
Our arts and recreational facilities support a vibrant and creative NSW. Cultural and sporting institutions are vital for attracting and retaining the people and skills that NSW needs to compete in the global economy. The Visitor Economy Taskforce has identified potential for arts infrastructure to act as an enabler to support visitor growth, creative industries and economic growth in regional NSW. The Visitor Economy Taskforce strategies to increase visitor numbers rely, to some extent on the attractiveness of our cultural institutions and programs.
Strong community support for this project has been consistently communicated through the various consultations undertaken over the past 10 years but particularly so since we commenced integrated planning in the past five years. Council’s Community Strategic Plan – “Albury 2030” not only specifically identifies the project, but the redevelopment of the gallery also supports the achievement of numerous targets within this Plan. These include:
Growing Economy theme – Increase Tourism to Albury and the Surrounding Region (increase visitor numbers, increase the economic impact of overnight stays, maintain and improve the current ranking of 16th most visited destination in regional NSW and Victoria, increase number of employees in the tourism sector). Growing Economy theme – Improve Visitors and Residents’ Experiences (implement the CBD Master Plans, Albury as an events/festivals destination, innovative and modern design responses for the built environment). Growing Economy theme – Plan and Cater for Increased Population Growth (CBD growth – the gallery and cultural precinct development is integral to the development of the Albury CBD). A Caring Community theme – Albury Offers a Diverse Range of Facilities and Activities for all Ages (QEII Square as an open space community heart). A Caring Community theme – Increased Participation in a Diverse Range of Art and Cultural Activities in Albury (Art Gallery).
Risk
Business Risk – the business risks particularly in relation to funding have been considered and discussed in the body of this report. Whilst there are underlying risks, such as no additional funding being forthcoming from the State Government or philanthropic areas, it has been shown that Council can accommodate the additional funding through existing cash reserves or additional loan funding. Specific risks of the project have been addressed in the Project Plan for the redevelopment.
Council Meeting – Monday 26 November 2012 63 AlburyCity - Council Meeting AGENDA
Corporate Risk – It is important this project is managed effectively in regard to the relationships with the State and Federal Government. If Council doesn’t proceed with the project there is a significant risk that the Federal Government’s perception and confidence in AlburyCity’s ability to deliver future projects could be eroded, consequently affecting future funding requests. It is also important that Council stays aligned with the various community consultations which have been undertaken to this stage of the project. An additional risk is that Albury will not maintain its position as the regional centre of choice or fulfil its role as a leading city for the region if the project were not to proceed.
OHS and Public Risk - These risks are addressed as part of the overall Project Plan.
Community Engagement
Over a long period of time there has been significant community engagement regarding this project. The Albury Regional Art Gallery Redevelopment project has been a cornerstone of the Cultural Precinct Masterplan that has sought to form and shape the future of the heart of Albury both including QEII Square and the surrounding area. The first stage of this Masterplan, the LibraryMuseum, has been a resounding success despite the detractors and critics at the time. The Albury LibraryMuseum is a showcase for the City, considered a benchmark in industry circles and a demonstration of the success that can be achieved through a shared vision and commitment to the future.
In recent years this project was supported by the community as part of the consultation process associated with the adoption by Council of the Special Variation to Rate Income.
Options
The options available to Council are:
1. That Council not proceed with the project and notify the Federal Government that Council does not wish to accept the offered $3.5 million funding. Council would also need to adjust the SVR to reflect this change. The change to the SVR is likely to be in the order of less than $6/annum/rateable assessment with $122,000 of income foregone in the 3rd year of the SVR. This income and its compounding effect will be foregone in perpetuity. Council would also inform the community and the Division of Local Government of the change. It should also note that this objective in the Strategic Community Plan will not be achieved.
2. That Council consider changing the scope of or staging the project. Investigation of this option has identified that due to the nature of the redevelopment it is not considered that either option is practical or appropriate. To change the scope of the project to $7 million would result in the project not achieving the intended aims or objectives set out in the Cultural Precinct Masterplan. The current proposal for the redevelopment of the gallery only brings the gallery to a size comparable with the average of 13 existing benchmarked regional galleries in NSW; therefore any major change in scope would not bring the gallery to an appropriate industry or community standard.
Council Meeting – Monday 26 November 2012 64 AlburyCity - Council Meeting AGENDA
The current design has been determined based on the required outcomes for a gallery of regional prominence, to support the business case and to ensure that any new asset is suitable and appropriate for its intended purpose both in the immediate and long term future. The building must be fit for purpose not based and determined solely on a budgetary figure. In relation to staging the project, the initial design establishment and primary service infrastructure costs will absorb a large proportion of the funding without achieving a great deal in the way of useable gallery space. It should also be noted that the design retains the existing heritage buildings which make it impractical to stage the development.
OR
3. That Council commit an additional $3.5 million toward the project which will be funded by cash reserves or loan funds, possibly the LIRS, or other options such as philanthropic funds to provide the best financial outcome for Council. As highlighted previously in the report the Council does have the capacity to fulfil this community aspiration within its current financial program without affecting its financial objective of achieving a surplus or break even operating position in the medium to long term.
Conclusion
This report provides direction in relation to the funding options available to Council in relation to the Albury Regional Art Gallery Redevelopment. Due to the timing constraints of the Federal Government funding and the project schedule, Council is in a position where it must determine to proceed with the project under these conditions or delay and in all likelihood forfeit funding from the federal government.
The primary funding options identify that the project can proceed within the existing 10 year budgetary framework. Council has the financial capacity to proceed with this important project either by way of cash reserves or loan funding. It is reasonable to apportion the costs of the project over the life of the asset which will be a benefit to the community over that period. The report also identifies a structure and strategy to allow funding independent of government to be achieved.
It is critical that this project proceed for the variety of reasons articulated in this report. The redeveloped Albury Regional Art Gallery is a unique opportunity to create a long term community asset which will reinforce Albury’s position as a regional city of choice, boost the local and regional visitor economy, serve the community for the next 50 plus years, achieve initiatives in Albury 2030 and the Cultural Precinct Master Plan, deliver an identified SVR project, improve community development outcomes for individuals and community as well as enhancing community capacity building.
It should be noted that there has been strong community support for sustainable visitor attractions in the city and it is acknowledged that there have been changes in the product offer in recent times. This well planned project will reinforce and build on the reputation of the cultural precinct as a major visitor attraction which can be sustained in the longer term.
Council Meeting – Monday 26 November 2012 65 AlburyCity - Council Meeting AGENDA
It should be highlighted that the federal funding is a significant grant which will not be achieved at any other time or by any other means, and that it is critical that Council take advantage of this opportunity.
Recommendation
That Council: a. proceed with the Albury Regional Art Gallery Redevelopment Project; b. commit additional funding of $3.5 million toward the Albury Regional Art Gallery Redevelopment by way of either cash reserves, or loan funding, or a combination of both; c. establish a working party to investigate, develop and implement a fundraising strategy in relation to the Art Gallery Redevelopment and enhancement of its art collection; and d. continue to lobby the NSW State Government for a contribution towards the Albury Regional Art Gallery Redevelopment.
Attachments 1. Copy of Council Report and Resolution from Monday 23 July 2012, including Attachment 1 – Project Management Plan. 2. Correspondence from the Hon. Andrew Stoner, MP – Wednesday 14 November 2012.
Council Meeting – Monday 26 November 2012 66
ATTACHMENT 2 – 9A
Community Information Session Transcript Tuesday 11 December 2012
Community Information Session REPORT
Report from the Albury Regional Art Gallery Redevelopment Community Information Session held on Tuesday 11 December 2012 in the Banquet Hall at the Albury Entertainment Centre, at 5.38pm
Staff Acting General Manager, Director Community and Recreation, Corporate Planner, Venue Manager and Governance Officer.
Councillors Crs A Glachan, D Betteridge, D Cameron, G Docksey, P Gould, R Jackson, K Mack and H van de Ven.
Apologies Cr D Thurley and Greg Aplin MP.
Kate de Hennin Welcomed participants to the information session and advised those in attendance Corporate Planner of the order of the night and ground rules. AlburyCity (Facilitator)
James Jenkins Power Point Presentation and overview of issues Director Community & Consultation to date Recreation The aim of the redevelopment AlburyCity Improvements – Gallery spaces, triple floor space, retail, cafe, accessibly Conceptual plans and a „fly through‟ presentation Economic impact – jobs, tourism
Michael Keys The Presentation Continued Acting General Manager Timeline – design, DA, Business Plan, Regional Development Australia grant AlburyCity successful May 2012, refused State Government funding Nov 2012 Tender process on hold 2.5 years to have project completed Original funding strategy Options – Council tops up funds, amend proposal to reduce cost, or not proceed with project. Reference to Newcastle City Council – two stages, $21M project. AlburyCity‟s project cannot be split into parts – two heritage buildings to preserve and join
Report from Community Information Session – Tuesday 11 December 2012 Page 1
Community Information Session REPORT
Michael Keys Funding strategies – Additional Council funding, Philanthropy/private funding (cont.) or donations, ongoing State Government lobbying and impact on alternative funding, reschedule current projects – for example, the Lavington Sports Oval, Emergency Management Centre Proposals for funding / donations need to be taken seriously – we need to do them properly Capital Works – reinvesting in the city (Sewer upgrades, road upgrades, CBD) Loans $53M – Manageable, stable, acceptable debit/service ratio Consultation Process 30 January 2013 cut off date Petition – 10,000 signatures needed to be tabled at Parliament
Kate de Hennin Session opened to the public. Questions and comments were sought. AlburyCity
Dorothy Smith Anyone in Australia can sign a petition, doesn‟t have to be a resident of Resident Albury Any age – no restrictions, parents can sign on behalf of their children for example We need the Art Gallery but we need the State funding
Michael Keys Confirmed that anyone from within Australia, of any age, can sign the petition, the AlburyCity only requirement be that the signatures be on the official petition form (one sided) and a current resident of Australia.
Father Peter Supportive the project Macleod-Miller Thanked the Council for the opportunity of this consultation process Resident Happy to wear the badge of support Can understand why people are undecided about this as there are political mixed messages being given Need to be curative rather than creative Great idea – but community needs their questions answered, to be able to refocus on this project Community needs change Making the Retro Cafe homeless – this is a mistake. Need to think of the future generation. The Arts/Cultural precinct (in the CBD) should have a space for the youth.
Report from Community Information Session – Tuesday 11 December 2012 Page 2
Community Information Session REPORT
Ken Ashley Yes – need bigger gallery Resident Plans shown tonight, are fine Question - How many quotes did we get to build this project? Follow up - How much profit will the construction company be pocketing and is it a local company?
James Jenkins The current plans are a concept design and costing ($10.5M) are only an estimate. AlburyCity The next step would be to call for tenders to produce a detailed design and architectural drawings, this process could take between 6 – 9 months.
In terms of cost – this will go to tender and costs will be provided in the proposals, giving us a more realistic value once the detailed designs have been completed. This process is traditional for all major infrastructure projects. The tenders and quotations will go to Council for decision.
Ken Ashley Seems like a huge estimated figure – how did we get to that amount? (follow up question)
James Jenkins We have that information available – it’s not currently on the website but we can AlburyCity provide it if you would like, Ken.
Stephen O‟Connell Background in music, but focused on all arts Murray This project is important for the community Conservatorium Education is at the heart of all this Without the arts people aren‟t as engaged in the community Supporter all arts Project is a great idea for Albury and will enhance our environment Will make it a much better place to live Economic benefits, community benefits, less crime, youth involvement
Bill Forge Speaking against the redevelopment Resident Against the redevelopment solely on the cost, and would be a burden placed on rate payers Working class families of Albury, Thurgoona and Lavington are at home, and not here to voice their opinions Information provided only presents one side of the argument – which supports the redevelopment (suggested) Council would be paying $4m interest from debt
Report from Community Information Session – Tuesday 11 December 2012 Page 3
Community Information Session REPORT
Bill Forge Recommends Councillors take notice of the interest paid on these loans (cont.) Should consolidate all debt, and work on removing debt
Alan Ross Did not like the fly through presentation of the building – will not use lifts with Resident glass doors. Too much glass – not happy walking on glass surfaces or glass walkways. Why can‟t you build a square, brick building – it would be cheaper Not one word in all this information about who‟s going to pay to run the Gallery when it‟s open.
James Jenkins Currently staffing levels would only increase by 1.6 FTE (Full Time Equivalent). AlburyCity The café/restaurant would be leased and operated independently.
The business plan indicates that operational costs of approximately $100k per year for Council to continue to run the Art Gallery.
Graeme AlburyCity spends $8M a year on consultants Richardson Why don‟t we pay lobbyists to get the job done, instead of relying on Greg Resident Aplin? Greg Aplin prefers to use honey instead of vinegar We shouldn‟t be holding debit obligations Investments – Not part of a class action for return on investment. This would have paid for our share and the NSW Governments share. We were told we have a surplus of $18M floating around waiting to be used and yet we are still asking for more money.
Michael Keys AlburyCity will continue to lobby the State Government. In reference to your AlburyCity question regarding the CDOs (Collateralized Debt Obligations) I am happy to discuss this with you Graeme, at another time.
Dot Williams We‟ve all been asked for money before (by our children) numerous times, Resident and sometimes you just have to say no, not this time. We can‟t afford this. Not happy to pay more rates, just to pay for this. If we can‟t afford, it‟s simple we can‟t afford it.
Report from Community Information Session – Tuesday 11 December 2012 Page 4
Community Information Session REPORT
Mary Callaway The project has merit (conceptually) Resident The reality check doesn‟t Frequents several Art Galleries nationally Supportive of the arts, but also many other elements of life Caring for the future of our environment (for example) is more important Public transport into the CDB from Lavington, on the weekends, is hard – not everyone has access to their own form of transport My needs are not necessary, it‟s the needs of others Other major projects need to be considered, not delayed What has already been deferred that we don‟t know about? We need to get the balance right – it‟s not right at the moment
Anita Saleeba This will create a wonderful future for Albury Resident Return on investment – example given; Bendigo Regional Art Gallery Redevelopment will benefit Albury We need to look after our future investments Cross the Border to look at other examples – example given; The Cube Look at the LibraryMuseum and the wonderful contribution it has made to our community
Jenny Bonner The Regional Art Gallery is important Howlong Resident Access to the arts is important Perhaps it is not easy to get bus from Lavington; however it is a lot harder to get plane to Sydney to view a National or International Art Exhibition Very much in support of this project for the region
Mary-Jane Griggs Happy ratepayer who is also an artist, as well as an Art Teacher Resident Positives – education, economics, community This region is so fantastic, services are great Cultural section is fantastic Live by the glass half full not half empty Have the guts to move forward
Eric Albury is the greatest City Resident Albury seems to provide a lot of services and facilities for fringe towns, including a lot of benefits It‟s a shame we can‟t go across the river for more funding
Report from Community Information Session – Tuesday 11 December 2012 Page 5
Community Information Session REPORT
John There seems to be the perception there is a precinct of privileged people (in Resident reference to the Cultural Precinct) – this is not right The precinct is for all people – everyone is welcome Arts adds to the Social Precinct When the LibraryMuseum was initially discussed; there were a lot of negative comments The numbers show the people through doors has increased – and the income generated from the facility is fantastic The Art Gallery will do that, this needs to be shown in the business plan It‟s great to see such awareness and interest in this area.
Richard Leyland Lover of the arts Resident Redevelopment is a wonderful concept Observation/Question – The idea of having the Burrows House facade demolished is totally inappropriate and should not be replaced by glass NSW Government is counting on an estimated $30M income as a result of inviting Manchester United to play soccer in Sydney; perhaps we should aim for a portion of that funding
James Jenkins Burrows House actually refers to the Department of Lands building (currently AlburyCity housing the Retro Youth Café). It has had a heritage status (built in 1881) and was part of the DA Heritage assessment completed. The front of the building that faces Dean Street is actually a later addition (1924). The independent heritage panel deemed the original veranda behind the façade was of more significance.
Jon Halpin Acknowledged the great work from Greg Aplin Hot House Cost – in our terms is a lot, but in context of what this would offer, it‟s not It‟s a 20 year investment In the grand scheme of things, it‟s small price to pay Regular visitor to city, now resident Sporting culture in the city is great, need to support the arts Albury is a great place to live This could be a jewel in our crown – town is already great, but can still get better Encouraged everyone to get more people to support this redevelopment, as it will only enhance developments in the city
Report from Community Information Session – Tuesday 11 December 2012 Page 6
Community Information Session REPORT
Audray Banfield Former Art Gallery Director Resident Finances (of the project) seems to be the only disagreement We should have balance – we have fantastic sporting facilities, CBD development is exciting, the Hothouse Theatre, the gateway, The Cube. Already rich with cultural activity, the redevelopment could enhance that 500- fold, if given more space People will flock here, as they have in Bendigo Don‟t run away with the idea that art is for the elite - art is for everyone We need this for the cultural heritage of the country, not just our city. If the TAFE is under threat, we need this even more Just do it!
Doug Hunter Question – Have we approached the VIC government to assist with the Resident funding? Follow up – Have we considered entry fees?
Michael Keys AlburyCity has received support from several neighbouring Councils as well as AlburyCity other organisations, listed on the information brochure – letters of support but no funding. VIC Government are highly unlikely to fund a project in NSW. However philanthropy options from organisations and individuals from either NSW or VIC will always be welcomed and are expected, due to our strong ties with Victoria.
James Jenkins In relation to fees, yes we’ve considered entry fees during the discussion stages of AlburyCity the business plan. Business plan is not based on charging fees as we want the space to be used by the community and accessible to all. It could be implemented down the track – but at this stage we want people in and using the Gallery at no fee.
In the past there have been two former exhibitions that we have charged an entry for. We could and likely would, charge if it meant bringing a larger international exhibition to Albury.
Workshop spaces and meeting rooms will be hired out and will generate some of the income and offset some costs.
Craig Dent Works with young people Resident Relocation of the Retro Cafe, has spoken with numerous young people Favourite building in Albury is the Albury War Memorial – people had the foresight, they carted bricks up the hill to have that built
Report from Community Information Session – Tuesday 11 December 2012 Page 7
Community Information Session REPORT
Albury has always been a community of vision Craig Dent Question - Have we explored naming rights? (cont.) If someone offers you $500k what can we offer them Regional Art Gallery hasn‟t grown in size since the 1980s – unlike other buildings or services in Albury. It‟s time. We can find a way – where there is a will, there is a way
Michael Keys We would like to improve and expand – we have ideas, we want to bring major AlburyCity exhibitions to Albury. We need the space. Build it and they will come – as they say. Council will be looking at all ideas, and naming rights could be an option. We would openly welcome donations of any size, especially a contribution of that size.
Graeme Question – Has Council even considered DGR (Deductible Gift Recipient) Richardson before you start asking for donations, what‟s Council‟s Status? Last time I discussed naming rights I received a nasty letter
Michael Keys Yes, we have DGR Status, it’s there and the framework is in place. The only AlburyCity difficulty with fundraising or collecting donations is that it seems inappropriate for us to collect the community’s donations without actually having a promise or commitment to building the facility.
Sally Weatherlake Question - What is Greg Aplin doing about this, what‟s his role?
Michael Keys Greg Aplin is doing everything possible to fight for this funding and is in full support AlburyCity of this project. He has provided regular feedback to Council; from my knowledge he’s been delivering letters, making noise at Parliament. The NSW government is aware of the project. We just keep getting the same answer coming back – there is no money.
Sally Weatherlake In relation to the petition we‟re signing, what makes Greg feel that this will (follow up question) make a difference?
Michael Keys There is no guarantee of action. We have been informed that if we submit what has AlburyCity been asked (a petition with over 10,000 signatures) the issue will be tabled and heard on the floor of Parliament early next year. We will have a 16 minute hearing on the floor of Parliament. It’s about getting them aware of our situation.
I have been advised there are already five items/petitions lodged and ahead of us; already on the floor next year.
Report from Community Information Session – Tuesday 11 December 2012 Page 8
Community Information Session REPORT
Sally Weatherlake Will Greg table the petition for Albury? (follow up question)
Michael Keys Yes. He has given us his support. AlburyCity
Mal Wiles It‟s been reported that you will be selling the Oze-wildlife site and the money Resident going to Wonga Wetlands, instead of saving the attraction. Lost like all the other items – Cumberoona, Uiver for example Lots going on behind the scenes Supports the project, however questions the design You could build things a lot cheaper if they are straight and square – much easier to build Yes build it – but consult with ratepayers more. Why does the money have to go to the Wonga Wetlands, what about the Uiver or Cumberoona? Spending two years building a boat ramp seems excessive Show that you (Council) are more efficient and you‟ll get more support from us (community) Only then will you get my support Show you are capable of managing these things
Michael Keys The Ettamogah Sanctuary that you are referring to was privately operated and AlburyCity owned; they came to their conclusion themselves, that it was no longer viable.
We recognise the facility at Wonga Wetlands as an important facility for the community in Albury; providing environmental conservation education. The current educational facilities out there at the moment are second rate; school kids are packed into small cramped rooms – we need to make it a more positive environment for learning.
Secondly any funds from the sale of land which is no longer needed should be reinvested back into the community. We want to recognise the efforts of Heidi Peck and her contribution to flora and fauna education and re-invest it in the future of Wonga Wetlands.
Council is thinking ahead on this issue. The land may not sell quickly, it may take months – but when it does the funds will be used to benefit the city, benefit the
Report from Community Information Session – Tuesday 11 December 2012 Page 9
Community Information Session REPORT
community; while also recognising the accomplishments of a local lady. Margaret England Albury is a marvellous place Resident Supportive of the project It‟s important for people to see art „in real life‟ 100% support Happy to make donation, or support in other forms Acknowledge the fantastic staff at the art gallery – always very encouraging.
Robyne Young Main street coordinator in the 1990s. Look what we have now – the CBD is a Resident great space. Everyone is engaged in the process If we don‟t have the foresight now, we are going to have an empty space I want to bring my grandchildren back here to grow up Art is not elitist People of all ages are engaged in the arts in some way - important to encourage that
Bill Forge Great sporting facilities in Lavington, but it still needs funding Resident Sports facilities get crowds of 10,000 at football and cricket finals People pay entry to these matches – even then there is a queue Has never seen a queue at the Art Gallery What we have is adequate
Michael Keys We want to and will continue to promote the Lavington Sportsground. We have AlburyCity identified capital funding for this project, and many parts of these planning upgrades can be staged. It’s also important to remember it too, is a regional facility.
Jim Kettyle Commends Council on this process Resident AlburyCity has been playing catch up for years We pay (almost) the highest rates in the state Tonight has been called because of the new Council Thanked the Councillors for digging their heels in and insisting tonight was organised We had a person quoted at the polling booths during the elections saying “we will be proceeding with this project with or without funding” There is no endless supply of money - this fact glossed over. We need to do our homework, forward planning is needed. Sackville Street was used as an example – a street to nowhere Commends the Council for the Art Gallery – we do need to plan for the future
Report from Community Information Session – Tuesday 11 December 2012 Page 10
Community Information Session REPORT
but we need to be able to afford it Jim Kettyle Don‟t always rely on falling back on the ratepayers (cont.) Make sure there is money in the tin before you plan – don‟t just expect it
Sue Houlihan Most amazing social opportunity Cafe should be more like a restaurant – the opportunity of what we can do with it will be fantastic We just need to find a way
Peter Hood Supportive of this project Resident Reprioritise other projects If the NSW Government do generate income from the soccer – lobby for these funds to assist the Lavington Sportsground works; freeing the capital works fund for the Art Gallery Redevelopment Question - It‟s stated that Retro will continue just in an alternative venue. Can you comment on the future of that?
James Jenkins We have several documents which support our planning – the first Precinct Master AlburyCity Plan always stated that the Burrows House site would be a temporary home for the Retro Café, due to the future Art Gallery Redevelopment plans.
Council has started the process of relocating the Retro Youth Café, this has involved consultation of over 400 young people and three workshops. Options are still being developed and will be presented to Council for a decision, in the near future.
Council will make this decision – this information not at a stage to present at this stage.
Kate de Hennin Due to time restraints, no further questions were asked. AlburyCity Community members were encouraged to take the time to fill out a survey on their thoughts in relation to this Redevelopment and an evaluation form on the evening‟s proceedings.
Michael Keys Thank you to the community for the fantastic turnout. Thank you for turning up, your AlburyCity voice has been heard, those both for and against and we really appreciate your participation in this process.
Report from Community Information Session – Tuesday 11 December 2012 Page 11
Community Information Session REPORT
Michael Keys Thank you to the Councillors for your attendance, (noting Cr Thurley’s apology). (cont.) The community is encouraged to stay back, talk to the Councillors and discuss your thoughts with them. Councillors want to hear from you, that’s why this evening was organised.
This is a great opportunity for the community to talk to them, one on one and hear your concerns.
Thanks everyone again for coming along and we wish all a Happy and Safe Christmas.
The Community Information Session closed at 7.20pm.
Please note the following people advised they were unable to make the community information session;
Ordette Mannering, Gary Prichard and Alan Argus.
Report from Community Information Session – Tuesday 11 December 2012 Page 12
ATTACHMENT 3 – 9A
AlburyCity Information Newsletter
ATTACHMENT 4 – 9A
Micromex Research Report – Art Gallery Redevelopment Research, February 2013
Art Gallery Redevelopment Research
February 2013
Prepared for:
Report prepared by:
ABN 14 003 179 440 10/1 Bounty Close Tuggerah, NSW 2259 Postal address: PO Box 5059, Chittaway Bay NSW 2261 Telephone: (02) 4352 2388 Fax: (02) 4352 2117 www.micromex.com.au [email protected]
The information contained herein is believed to be reliable and accurate. However, no guarantee is given as to its accuracy and reliability, and no responsibility or liability for any information, opinions or commentary contained herein, or for any consequences of its use, will be accepted by Micromex Research, or by any person involved in the preparation of this report.
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research February 2013
Table of Contents
Introduction
Background and Methodology 1 Community Engagement Activities 2 Sample Profile 3 Key Findings 4
Results
Support of Council Proceeding with the Project without NSW State Government Funding 5 Pursuing Other Avenues of Funding 6 Redevelopment Encouraging Future Visitation 7 NSW State Government Funding for Major Infrastructure Projects in Regional Cities 8 Other Comments Regarding the Proposed Albury Regional Art Gallery Redevelopment 9 Demographics 14
Appendices
A. Additional Comments – Verbatim Community Responses 16 B. Questionnaire 66 C. Community Engagement Activities 68
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research February 2013
Background and Methodology
AlburyCity sought to examine the level of community support for Council to spend additional ratepayers‟ money on a major infrastructure redevelopment of the Albury Regional Art Gallery.
To facilitate this, Micromex Research was contracted to develop a survey template that enabled Council to effectively analyse attitudes and trends within the community.
Questionnaire
Micromex Research, together with AlburyCity, developed the questionnaire.
A copy of the questionnaire is provided in Appendix B.
Data collection
The survey appeared on the AlburyCity website during the period 7th December 2012 to 31st January 2013. Invitations to participate were sent directly to residents and special interest groups by AlburyCity, as well as promoted via local media throughout the survey period.
Sample selection and error
The sample consisted of a total of 1,061 participants.
A sample size of 1,061 residents provides a maximum sampling error of plus or minus 3.0% at 95% confidence.
Data analysis
The data within this report was analysed using SPSS. To identify the statistically significant differences between the groups of means, „One-Way Anova Tests‟ and „Independent Samples T- Tests‟ were used. „Z Tests‟ were also used to determine statistically significant differences between column proportions. The difference is significant at the .05 level.
Ratings questions
The unipolar scale of 1 to 5, where 1 was the lowest importance or satisfaction and 5 the highest importance or satisfaction, was used in all rating questions.
Mean rating explanation
Mean rating: 1.99 or less „Very low‟ level of importance/support 2.00 – 2.49 „Low‟ level of importance/support 2.50 – 2.99 „Moderately low‟ level of importance/support 3.00 – 3.59 „Moderate‟ level of importance/support 3.60 – 3.89 „Moderately high‟ level of importance/support 3.90 – 4.19 „High‟ level of importance/support 4.20 – 4.49 „Very high‟ level of importance/support 4.50+ „Extremely high‟ level of importance/support
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 1 February 2013
Community Engagement Activities
Further to the online quantitative research conducted by Micromex, AlburyCity held a range of community engagement activities, including two „Speak Out‟ events, facilitated interactive sessions and accepting submissions via letters and emails. A petition was also created by AlburyCity to be sent to the NSW Parliament, which received 2,920 signatures as at 31/12/2012.
These communication activities were conducted and analysed by AlburyCity. Details of each activity can be found in Appendix C.
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 2 February 2013
Sample Profile
Gender Male 42%
Female 58%
Age
18-29 8%
30-44 20%
45-59 40%
60+ 32%
Visitation of the Art Gallery in the last 2 years
User 72%
Non-user 28%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Base: n=1,061
Art Gallery „users‟ were identified as having visited the Art Gallery in the last 2 years Users of the Art Gallery are significantly more likely to be female than male (78% vs. 65%)
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 3 February 2013
Key Findings – Online Research
Participation in this research garnered a great deal of interest from residents of the AlburyCity LGA and surrounding areas. A response rate of over one thousand participants clearly demonstrates a high level of interest by residents and stakeholders to have a say and to get involved in plans for the future of the area.
Overall, the research has found a divided public opinion in regards to the Albury Regional Art Gallery redevelopment project proceeding without funding from the NSW Government.
Respondents expressed a „moderate‟ level support for the project proceeding, with 50% of respondents giving a rating of „supportive‟ to „very supportive‟, and 45% giving a rating of „not very supportive‟ to „not at all supportive‟.
A „moderately high‟ level of importance was attributed to Council continuing to pursue other avenues of funding to ensure the Albury Regional Art Gallery redevelopment goes ahead.
52% of respondents stated that the redevelopment would encourage them to visit the Art Gallery more frequently, whilst 45% claimed it would not affect their visitation levels.
The majority of respondents (86%) feel that the NSW State Government should provide funding for major infrastructure projects in regional cities.
Key Findings – Community Engagement Activities
The comment that was repeated in various forms throughout the engagement activities was “yes, go for it, BUT I would like to know in more detail which other Council programs will be postponed/curtailed to find the extra 3.5 million”.
When asked what participants like most when visiting an art gallery, the top 3 most popular and consistent responses were:
1. The experience of seeing something new 2. Learning something different 3. The collection and famous paintings
The main reasons mentioned in these activities for supporting the project have been:
• The project supports artists and growth in the cultural economy • Community benefit • Cultural tourism and raising Albury‟s profile as a regional centre • The building is past its usable service • Education • Collection management
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 4 February 2013
Results
Support of Council Proceeding with the Project without NSW State Government Funding
Overall, the research has found a divided public opinion in regards to the Art Gallery redevelopment project proceeding without funding from the NSW Government.
Respondents expressed a „moderate‟ level support for the project proceeding, with 50% of respondents giving a rating of „supportive‟ to „very supportive‟, and 45% giving a rating of „not very supportive‟ to „not at all supportive‟.
Those who had visited the Art Gallery were significantly more supportive than were those who had not visited.
Respondents aged 18-29 and 30-44 expressed higher levels of support than did those aged 60+.
Females were more supportive than were males.
Q1. How supportive are you of Council proceeding with the project without funding from the NSW State Government? This will mean Council having to contribute an additional $3.5m.
User Non-User Overall
Support mean ratings 3.63 1.66 3.08
18-29 30-44 45-59 60+ Male Female
Support mean ratings 3.64 3.24 3.13 2.80 2.76 3.32
Mean ratings: 1 = not at all supportive, 5 = very supportive
= A significantly higher level of support (by group) = A significantly lower level of support (by group)
Very supportive 39%
Supportive 11%
Somewhat supportive 5%
Not very supportive 8%
Not at all supportive 37%
0% 20% 40%
Base: n=1,061
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 5 February 2013
Pursuing Other Avenues of Funding
A „moderately high‟ level of importance was attributed to Council continuing to pursue other avenues of funding to ensure the Albury Regional Art Gallery redevelopment goes ahead.
Users of the Art Gallery rated the importance as higher than did those who have not visited in the last 2 years.
Participants in the 18-29 and 45-59 age groups felt it was more important than did those aged 60+.
Females placed a higher level of importance on further pursuing other avenues than did males.
Q2. How important is it for the community that Council continues to pursue other avenues of funding to ensure the Albury Regional Art Gallery redevelopment goes ahead?
User Non-User Overall
Importance mean ratings 4.11 2.54 3.68
18-29 30-44 45-59 60+ Male Female
Importance mean ratings 4.05 3.66 3.81 3.43 3.32 3.93
Mean ratings: 1 = not at all important, 5 = very important
= A significantly higher level of importance (by group) = A significantly lower level of importance (by group)
Very important 49%
Important 15%
Somewhat important 10%
Not very important 8%
Not at all important 18%
0% 20% 40% 60%
Base: n=1,061
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 6 February 2013
Redevelopment Encouraging Future Visitation
52% of respondents stated that the redevelopment would encourage them to visit the Art Gallery more frequently, whilst 45% claimed it would not affect their visitation levels. Only 3% stated that their future visitation would decline due to the redevelopment.
The redevelopment is significantly more likely to encourage future visitation by current users of the Art Gallery (66% vs. 15%). The majority of current non-users (78%) stated that it would not change their visitation level, which is significantly higher when compared with current users (33%).
Females were more likely to state that the redevelopment would increase their visitation (58% vs. 43%), whilst males were more likely to claim that their visitation level would remain the same (53% vs. 39%).
Residents in the 18-59 age groups had a higher incidence of a claimed future visitation increase than did those aged 60+ (65%, 58% and 54% vs. 43%), whilst those in the 60+ age group were more likely to state that their visitation level would remain unchanged (54% vs. 30%, 39% and 44%).
Q3. Would the redevelopment encourage you to visit the Art Gallery more often?
I would visit less frequently 3%
My visitation I would visit level would more remain the frequently same 52% 45%
Base: n=1,061
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 7 February 2013
NSW State Government Funding for Major Infrastructure Projects in Regional Cities
The majority of respondents (86%) feel that the NSW State Government should provide funding for major infrastructure projects in regional cities.
Current users of the Art Gallery were more likely to believe the State Government should provide funding than were non-users (91% vs. 75%).
Respondents aged 18-29, 30-44 and 45-59 were more likely to say the State Government should provide funding than were those aged 60+ (95%, 89% and 88% vs. 80%).
Q4. Do you think the NSW State Government should provide funding for major infrastructure projects in regional cities, such as Albury?
Unsure No 8% 6%
Yes 86%
Base: n=1,061
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 8 February 2013
Other Comments Regarding The Proposed Albury Regional Art Gallery Redevelopment
Q5. Are there any other comments you would like to make regarding the proposed Albury Regional Art Gallery redevelopment?
Word Frequency Tagging
Verbatim responses for this question were collated and entered into analytical software. This analysis „counts‟ the number of times a particular word or phrase appears and, based on the frequency of that word or phrase, a font size is generated. The larger the font, the more frequently the word or sentiment is mentioned.
Comments from Participants who are Supportive to Very Supportive of Council Proceeding without Funding
Cultural 24%
Community 22%
Exhibitions 17%
Important 17%
Funding 12%
0% 20% 40%
Comments: n=319
Nb. For a full list of verbatim responses, please see Appendix A.
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 9 February 2013
Other Comments Regarding The Proposed Albury Regional Art Gallery Redevelopment
Q5. Are there any other comments you would like to make regarding the proposed Albury Regional Art Gallery redevelopment?
Representative Sample of Comments
Cultural
It would contribute to widening the scope of the Australian cultural experience
It will be an excellent addition to the cultural precinct and would significantly increase tourism to Albury, as well as being a source of education and pleasure for residents
This redevelopment would provide a cultural hub, thus enhancing the arts in our community and making an even more wonderful space to attract exhibitions and functions. We don't want Albury to be a cultural backwater
This redevelopment is vital for the general community with regards to cultural experiences
This valuable economic and cultural project is for community betterment and needs to proceed
Albury needs to continue to develop its identity. The arts have long been a stronghold and an ever-growing aspect of our wonderful city, and as a long term vision, we, the residents, in conjunction with the Council, must strive to maintain this as part of our cultural landscape
The importance of the arts is often underestimated. For regional Australia, the arts are an important part of the community fabric in providing a more complete cultural experience
Albury is growing in its cultural development very slowly. As such, this would be a most encouraging opportunity for Albury and its community
Albury needs to update and enhance its cultural venues. It‟s what makes a city like this appealing to its residents, tourists and prospective residents
Cultural development of this nature puts locations like Albury on the map for tourism and enriches the lives of the people who live here. This type of development is essential
Community
The value of a cultural facility such as an art gallery cannot be measured in dollars. It contributes to the wellbeing of a community in many ways, often indirectly, but artistic expression in its many forms is vital
Albury has a vibrant arts community and this is a major drawcard for the city
All tiers of government should be contributing to the ongoing development of arts and cultural spaces as this is a vital part of a healthy community
Art is important to our community
It's an investment in the future of Albury and would provide social, cultural and economic benefits to the community
Access to the arts is essential for a healthy well balanced community
For a full list of verbatim responses, please see Appendix A
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 10 February 2013
Other Comments Regarding The Proposed Albury Regional Art Gallery Redevelopment
Q5. Are there any other comments you would like to make regarding the proposed Albury Regional Art Gallery redevelopment?
Representative Sample of Comments
Exhibitions
The local economy would benefit enormously from the exhibitions
Albury needs a better art gallery to attract the larger exhibitions that attract visitors to the area. A few good exhibitions would easily make up for the $3.5m outlaid by the Council
Albury needs the facility to display its collection and attract further travelling exhibitions
Redevelopment would give the Albury Regional Art Gallery the opportunity to host innovative, contemporary and challenging exhibitions and should be considered a major asset to the city and its people
The redeveloped art gallery would be able to hold first class exhibitions over a period of months, not just days or weeks
Important
This development is very important for Albury and should go ahead no matter who funds it
It would ensure that Albury would become an important regional centre of the visual arts and design
It is so important to improve the place of art in our society
The gallery is an important resource for the schools in the area
Art in its many various forms is so important
Funding
Council and State funding for the Regional Gallery should at least be equal to the funding given by those government sectors to all sporting activities over the last 5 years
It is sad that the State Government will not provide their share of the funding, but I fully support Council providing the additional funds to ensure the redevelopment
It‟s important to chase funding for arts in the region and to have an art gallery to be proud of
Just do it. The arts deserve as much funding as sporting facilities
Regardless of where the funding comes from, it will be yet another drawcard for visitors to the region
It would be an enormous shame to lose the Federal funding that Council officers have worked so hard to obtain, just because the State Government is not willing to come to the party
This is a valuable and worthwhile project for Albury and it is imperative that it goes ahead now while there is Federal funding available
For a full list of verbatim responses, please see Appendix A
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 11 February 2013
Other Comments Regarding The Proposed Albury Regional Art Gallery Redevelopment
Q5. Are there any other comments you would like to make regarding the proposed Albury Regional Art Gallery redevelopment?
Word Frequency Tagging
Verbatim responses for this question were collated and entered into analytical software. This analysis „counts‟ the number of times a particular word or phrase appears and, based on the frequency of that word or phrase, a font size is generated. The larger the font, the more frequently the word or sentiment is mentioned.
Comments from Participants who are Not Very Supportive to Not At All Supportive of Council Proceeding without Funding
Infrastructure 14%
Community 12%
Funding 11%
Services 10%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20%
Comments: n=338
Nb. For a full list of verbatim responses, please see Appendix A.
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 12 February 2013
Other Comments Regarding The Proposed Albury Regional Art Gallery Redevelopment
Q5. Are there any other comments you would like to make regarding the proposed Albury Regional Art Gallery redevelopment?
Representative Sample of Comments
Infrastructure
I‟m absolutely, positively opposed to the development. Put our money into roads and other more important infrastructure
At a time when Council is applying to increase rates to cover basic infrastructure, maintenance and upgrades, it seems unwise to go further into debt to fund an unnecessary project with questionable value
Governments should help fund major infrastructure projects; however, I would not regard the current proposal as being a major infrastructure project when one considers the many other projects that the city needs to undertake
What a waste of money that would be better spent on other more important infrastructure like sewer upgrades or roads
Community
There are better things to spend money on that will benefit the whole community
Get on with far more important community issues
It's time Council started looking at things that benefit the greater community rather than small minority groups
Funding
Albury should not proceed with less than dollar for dollar support from the State and Federal governments
Strenuous efforts should already be in progress to obtain funding from private and philanthropic sources as it seems any consideration from the NSW State Government does not seem likely
The state government provides funds each year for such things as infrastructure, why then can't Council wait until such grants are available?
Services
Art galleries and the like should be self funding. Ratepayers‟ money should be spent on providing essential services to residents, not spent on useless unpopular white elephants that appeal only to the upper classes
I would like Council to spend my money on essential services, for example, we live in a new area but have no footpaths
I believe development of the Regional Art Gallery should not be prioritised ahead of supportive services for youth, mental health and suicide prevention, such as the proposed Headspace Centre
For a full list of verbatim responses, please see Appendix A
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 13 February 2013
Demographics
Q6. Have you visited the Albury Art Gallery in the last 2 years?
Count Colum n %
Yes 769 72%
No 292 28%
Tot al 1061 100%
Q7. What age group are you in?
Count Colum n %
18-29 86 8%
30-44 212 20%
45-59 422 40%
60 years and older 341 32%
Tot al 1061 100%
Q8. Gender.
Count Column %
M ale 445 42%
Female 616 58%
Tot al 1061 100%
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 14 February 2013
Demographics
Q9. What is your postcode?
NSW Victoria Other
Count Column % Count Column % Count Column %
2640 681 64% 3690 67 6% 4171 1 0% 2641 185 17% 3691 26 2% 4670 1 0% 2642 13 1% 3685 5 0% 5351 1 0%
2643 8 1% 3747 5 0% 2644 8 1% 3749 5 0% 2646 5 0% 3741 3 0% 2658 3 0% 3683 2 0% 2659 3 0% 3697 2 0% 2540 2 0% 3698 2 0% 2660 2 0% 3701 2 0% 2710 2 0% 3004 1 0% 2773 2 0% 3066 1 0% 2000 1 0% 3070 1 0% 2041 1 0% 3078 1 0% 2050 1 0% 3152 1 0% 2225 1 0% 3194 1 0% 2462 1 0% 3199 1 0% 2484 1 0% 3350 1 0% 2605 1 0% 3677 1 0% 2615 1 0% 3687 1 0% 2650 1 0% 3688 1 0% 2714 1 0% 3699 1 0%
2750 1 0% 2785 1 0% 2880 1 0%
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 15 February 2013
Appendix A Additional Comments – Verbatim Community Responses
Other Comments
Nb. In order to maintain the integrity of these responses, comments have not been edited and are an exact representation of what was said by participants.
$10.5m is an excessive amount to spend on the project. I do not believe that kind of cost is warranted at this point in time. Due to the economic downturn i feel any money spent should be directed to existing infrastructure. Albury city should consider this project when the economy is more favourable and as previously stated $10.5m is an excessive amount that should not be spent. $10000000 for a top end of town play thing, what about a 2 mill option? Then a plan to reduce debt!!! Then get fiscally fit for the time when the U.S.A. goes over the edge into a hole so deep that the world will shudder for many years 1% of Albury‟s population would go there. Why spend a huge chunk of the budget on a small minority when the roads are falling apart (creek st for one) and Lavington area looks like a rubbish dump. Council needs to spend a bit more time and money in Lavington as that‟s where the population base is. The art gallery redevelopment is a complete and utter waste of money except for the few who are interested but it seems these few are more important than the needs of the majority. Fix the roads and clean up the rubbish and broken glass scattered through the parks and paths would seem a better use of such a large chunk of the budget. 10.5 mil? Who are we kidding!!!! Get real and deal with things within our means. We cannot afford this so why do it. What‟s wrong with our current art gallery? Nothing, give it a face lift if you must but i like the nostalgia. Don't put us into more debt and then increase our rates again! 6a i already am registered on council's electronic direct mail and i am a regular visitor to the gallery. It is very important that it goes ahead for the current conditions under which staff work are appalling and the region misses out on top quality exhibitions because of the unsatisfactory facilities available. Far more pressure should be have been placed onto our local liberal member and the state liberal government long before this to ensure they provided the $3.5m funding for this essential regional project for our liberal voting community. Any extra money needed over and above the estimated $10.5 million if goes over budget and it could, may then come from council funds. We must get the state government involved.
A better gallery would be a huge benefit to the city and its people. Regional galleries such as those in Bendigo and wagga which are better developed attract greater numbers.
A commitment to this project would be significant for sustaining the cultural and intellectual credibility of Albury. Improve the quality of life for residents as well as attracting cultural tourism it would contribute to widening the scope of Australian cultural experience.
A complete waste of rate payers money
A fantastic and exciting development.
A first class facility will attract better collections and therefore increase visits locally as well as tourism
A great project that should proceed-if this was a sports stadium we wouldn't even be having this discussion. Arts are an outlet for both young and old.
A redeveloped Albury art gallery would enrich the border community and allow the gallery/council to attract and accommodate major showcase exhibitions, including international exhibitions (at the Bendigo and Ballarat art galleries, the national gallery of victoria and the national gallery in Canberra), thereby boosting Albury's economy. Personally my wife and i have travelled to Bendigo especially to see last year's Grace Kelly exhibition, and to Melbourne (several times) and Canberra to see various visiting international exhibitions.
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 16 February 2013
Other Comments
A redevelopment of the site gives some redress and balance to the monies spent on sporting facilities by Albury city. At today's cost of money it seems sensible to complete a full redevelopment rather than leave for a future administration to do at a higher capital cost. Proceed with the project.
A relatively small amount of money to be repaid over time and the local economy would benefit enormously from the exhibitions which would be attracted to come to Albury.
A total misuse of ratepayers funds that could be used to better Albury attracting outside visitors
Abandon the project altogether
Absolutely positively opposed to the development - put our money into roads and other more important infrastructure.
Acc should have not have let this situation develop .incompetent staff should be dealt with in a transparent manner.
After spending a period of time overseas recently it is very clear that all overseas countries value their cultural institutions far more than in Australia. They recognise the intellectual, cultural, social and historical capital contained therein. No individual in this community has the right to foist their archaic ideas of what is 'right' for this city if they have made no effort to fully research what they are talking about. Scare tactics such as increased rates and value for money arguments are trotted out endlessly by ageing individuals who rarely set foot in the gallery - if ever, and who have no idea about the financial capacity of Albury city to fund any such projects. The library museum was similarly attacked at its conception and now we enjoy a highly successful, world class facility. We need to pursue this vision lest this city fulfil its sad promise as a backward, sports centric, anti-intellectual backwater. After visiting the gallery and having to pay to see something that is free to the public i don't recommend any one support this redevelopment. Council could lash out and look at ways of supporting health and schools. Even the hard waste collection is a better idea that this redevelopment Albury and surrounding areas has long held a strong, well respected and vibrant art community. The re- development of the Albury art gallery, would benefit local and regional artists, the wider community, and would be a major draw card to our beautiful city. Our profile would be raised across the arts on a national level - a benefit financially to all. Albury cities level of reoccurring financial commitment is reflected in the highest level of rates and service charges. In tough economic times new expenditure has to wait until it can be afforded and not at the expense of others with a higher priority. Save for the art gallery do not debt burden the city.
Albury citizens often say that there is nothing here to entice visitors. A redeveloped modern art gallery that can hold large contemporary exhibitions would be just such a draw card. It would also continue to improve dean st and the cultural precinct. Albury deserves an art gallery suitable for the 21st century.
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 17 February 2013
Other Comments
Albury city seems to have been a leader Australia wide over the past twenty years when it comes to developing its cbds, especially when you consider how many traders had left dean street in the early nineties prior to the first cbd upgrade. Council has over time completed some wonderful cbd developments, some better than others, but all have added to the depth of quality that reflects out classy cities heritage. As an Albury city rate payer i am proud to live in a town that impresses others who want to visit and enjoy our safe vibrant tree lined streetscapes for dining, entertaining, cultural activities and retail. Albury has grown and developed in a positive direction and needs to keep this momentum going by continuing with projects like the proposed development of the cultural precinct including qeii square upgrade and the new art gallery project. As a direct result of Albury's cbd developments, our city has attracted large numbers of new visitors and residents. By not continuing these projects our city will lose its momentum and appear unfinished with a large vacant unused, unattractive paddock surrounded by antiquated facilities that don't open to this potentially wonderful open space. Qeii should service and be the focus of our cities cbd which it doesn't do now. So to me, it all boils down to do we want to continue being a progressive city to be proud of, or a city that will eventually be over populated with inadequate community space, services and public cbd facilities for both new and long term rate payers. If the quality of our city is watered down, then why would anyone want to continue living here, especially families who made a choice for their children to enjoy rural living lifestyles with city facilities? Albury council needs to back the vision it has shown on this project and have the courage to follow it through. Don't let the city become a cultural backwater simply because a couple of councillors lacking the same sort of vision have decided to oppose it - simply, it appears, for the sake of ill-informed grandstanding. Another regional city would probably be only too happy to take Albury's place should the city bow to the vocal minority and allow the art gallery development to disappear over the horizon. And if it's about only about dollars, surely the investment will reap a handsome medium- and long-term return for the city. Cultural vibrancy coupled with facilities that tap into this can be a strong motivation for potential investment from outside the region. (the botanical apartments have been marketed on this basis, but it's a bit hard to sell these kinds of cosmopolitan attractions if you don't back it with the reality of a genuine, nation/world-class cultural precinct).
Albury council seems to have forgotten that they need to operate within their means without committing the council and it's ratepayers to further debt
Albury gallery has the significant photographic collection which will enhance visitation to the area. E.g. wagga has glass gallery Dubbo ceramics. It is a wonderful feature for Albury and will put us on the map.
Albury has a vibrant arts community and this is a major draw card for the city. A redevelopment would only enhance this and in turn create more interest, jobs etc. in the region.
Albury has little to offer tourists or attract you as a place to go! A regional art gallery with world class exhibitions would attract tourists. Visitors from vic and nsw and locals. There is nowhere for local and professional and amateur artists to exhibit as a part of a local arts program. Albury has no no major attractions. People come to stay in Albury and ask us in our retail store "what is there to see or do here?' we have to answer go to... Beechworth, Rutherglen, or even to the wagga wave pool because there are no real attractions here and certainly no real attraction for families with toddlers/ children. Perhaps the attention on an art gallery would focus not only on art, but activities for children similar to the style they ran in the national gallery in Canberra when the Van Gogh exhibition was there. I heard 32 million was the estimated value of tourism dollars when the Grace Kelly exhibition was on in victoria.... Let‟s get some of that!! Albury is a great place, sporting facilities are well used and bring people to town, and however their entourage have nothing to encourage them to stay, spend and tell others to come to see.... Please that needs to be addressed!
Albury has one of the best regional galleries in the country. This could make it the best.
Albury is a cultural city, and as such money should be allocated for such projects with input from federal and state governments.
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 18 February 2013
Other Comments
Albury is getting flogged by wagga's art gallery. Wagga has more exhibitions in their larger art gallery. The existing front wall of the gallery needs reinforcing at the top, starting to crack. Has this been allowed for?
Albury is growing in its cultural development very slowly. Thus would be a most encouraging opportunity for Albury and its community
Albury lacks tourism 'sites' and events to attract tourists (and their dollars). The city can't get its act together on the uiver or the cumberoona so this time funding a top class arts centre to enhance dean st and qe2 square, provide a space for more local and visiting exhibitions should be a priority.
Albury loves it's sport support sport with your investments sport team invest & add to tourism
Albury must keep abreast with cultural development if it is to remain an attraction to tourists. It is senseless to wait until the existing gallery becomes outdated and dysfunctional.
Albury need‟s to press ahead with developments such as this. I think it is vital in order to remain at the forefront in leading the way in regional Australia for having modern up to date art and cultural museums. Otherwise other regional cities such as wagga and Bendigo will have better tourist drawcards then Albury! Albury should strive to be the best!
Albury needs a better art gallery to attract the larger exhibitions that attract visitors to the area. A few good exhibitions would easily make up for the $3.5m outlaid by the council.
Albury needs the facility to display its collection and attract further travelling exhibitions
Albury needs to be recognised as a region that offers a sophisticated space for permanent and travelling art shows. The space also needs to act as a venue that adapts and caters for functions such as corporate events and weddings and this would also engage the wider public with the gallery space and Albury as a destination area.
Albury needs to continue to develop its identity. The arts have long been a stronghold and an ever-growing aspect of our wonderful city, and as a long term vision, we, the residents, in conjunction with the council, must strive to maintain this as part of our cultural landscape.
Albury needs to update and enhance its cultural venues- it‟s what makes a city like this appealing to its residents, tourists and prospective residents.
Albury rates are too high now, $2.5m is a lot of money however i do agree with the tri partisan funding arrangement with state, federal and council all chipping in their $2.5m share of the costs to secure gallery. $5m for a regional facility is bullshit, after all it is a regional facility why shouldn't our neighbouring councils and the nsw government pay as well as Albury ratepayers (i for one am sick of paying more than my share to benefit our neighbouring councils) our library is a regional library but who pays for restocking books, maintenance and upkeep (only Albury ratepayers). Isn't it about time our neighbouring councils and ratepayers starting paying when they use the facilities paid and supplied by Albury ratepayers about time that their free ride/s came to an end why should Albury be expected to be their cash cow? About we bring in a user pays system for our neighbours to keep our rates in check. Bottom line if the state don't chip in and we cannot secure funding from any other source then this project should be shelved until we do!! ! I also think it unfair that people from outlying shires and councils are being allowed a say when at the end of the day they will not have to fund this Albury ratepayers will so it is only fair that only Albury people should have input into this survey.
Albury requires money spent in other areas of more important
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 19 February 2013
Other Comments
Albury should not proceed with less than $1 for $1 support from state and federal govt. 2 options - follow up at least $2m from nsw - scale back the development
Albury would be absolutely mad to miss an opportunity to receive funding such as this. All councillors who vote against this proposal must remember that the amount of employment, tourism and general revenue will suffer without this project. Albury/Wodonga was established as a satellite city by a previous labour government. There should be people from the era who are still passionate about making this fabulous regional city progress & develop to meet the challenges of the new millennium. Has the council drawn upon these people & their skills to assist in making the government continue to accept their commitment for country people? We are not an ignorant, silent, voice & should be given the same academic & education opportunities at no additional cost (by having to either relocate or travel to either Melbourne or Sydney) as our city comrades.
All the great cities have waterways, generous parklands, representative architecture, and cultural venues.
All the hard work has been done planning this project and getting federal government support. Albury council cannot afford to miss the opportunity to fulfil their qeii project. The library museum is a huge success and i believe that the upgraded art gallery and restaurant facing qeii square will be the icing on the cake! It is important to keep petitioning the nsw government and seeking other philanthropic sponsors, however Albury council must make the bold move to make sure that their vision is fulfilled. Do not delay any longer! Best wishes.
All tiers of government should be contributing to the ongoing development of arts and cultural spaces as this is a vital part of a healthy community
Although answer yes to question 4, obviously the funds need to be available. There needs to be responsible priorities set for spending, as the nsw government are doing.
Another way to support the project is to ask the citizens to make a one off $100.00 donation. Just a suggestion.
Art galleries and the like should be self-funding. Rate payers money should be spent on providing essential services to residents, not spent on useless unpopular white elephants that appeal only to the upper classes
Art in its many various forms is so important not only for everything the city gains for tourism but is such a great need as a healthier society .art has a great impact and sensory need for a way of expressing and enjoying the arts which every human needs to have a well-balanced life.
Art is important to our community
As a business owner (x3) i believe the money could be better spent elsewhere, I‟m also a huge fan of the arts, but in these times local businesses could use the money for "festival or something else bringing local people out"
As a frequent visitor, i have observed the address from all over Australia and the world in the visitors book. While selling raffle tickets for the friends of the Albury art gallery over the last two years i have sold to people from many regional towns and visitors. Have spoken to many day trip visitors who go to the commercial club for lunch, half stay and play the pokies and the other half wander down to the gallery and the bus picks up in front of qe11. Of all the assets that Albury owns the gallery and the library museum would be the most sorts after and visited. As a large community we have more pressing issues/expensive projects to attend to first e.g. Cctv in the cbd to protect the innocent people who want to enjoy themselves without being harassed by intoxicated, violent people and to feel safe at all times, also for all parks/playgrounds to always be kept safe.
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 20 February 2013
Other Comments
As a rate payer i would expect that the council pursue further funding from the nsw state government and if successful proceed with the new gallery which would be a great thing for Albury. However, this project should be put on hold if they are not successful and there should be no further contribution from the council other than what has been nominated to date. Sometimes we just have to wait for the good things in life and this is one of those projects that is desirable but most happen when the money is available. I would suggest that maybe a staged project could be undertaken with the funds already available. Stage 1 and then stage 2 when further funds are available from the nsw state government which has let us down. Thank you for opportunity to comment. I think the council has done the right thing in putting this back to the citizens. Congratulations to the councillors that voted in favour of this opportunity for the citizens to make clear their opinion on the important matter.
As a rate payer we should be told how much extra it will cost in wages as to now per year
As a ratepayer don‟t support ratepayers funding shortfall in costs but council should make this issue a election issue at the next state government elections
As a student i believe this is vital to the future of the city and for future generations. $3.5m in the big scheme of things is not a lot of money. Please can we just get on with it?
As a substantial rate payer, i would like what $3.5 million dollars is quantified as a percentage increase to my rates is going to be. Even if expressed as 0.0003% i can use this to calculate the actual cost to me personally. After all, it is a compulsory form of donation to the art gallery (which i have visited once or twice in the 30 years i have lived here. (see q3. An irrelevant question for the majority of the population of Albury like me?) As a volunteer in 3 regional galleries over the past 12 years, i have witnessed firsthand newcomers learning about & experiencing for the first time art in its various forms. School children for whom visiting their local gallery at an early age will have a firm understanding of the joy & learning experience of art galleries right throughout their lives. Art galleries are as important a facility in the community as sporting venues. As a wheelchair user i hope that an upgrade would provide more suitable access. At present one has to go around the back and ring a bell. This should not be a barrier to me; but i confess it is, and I‟ve yet to summon courage to go inside.
As coordinator of creators art space Wodonga, i would like to add our name to the list of supporting bodies. This development will strongly enhance the arts communities of Albury and Wodonga
As far as i am concerned there are far more important things than the art gallery. It is about time the council looked around the streets and see what needs to be done, like footpaths in the winter it is impossible to walk on the nature strip, because of wet grass overhanging trees both council and private, cracked gutters and kerbs. People should not have to walk on the road, especially the old and ladies with prams it is dangerous. As it stands at the moment there are very few attractions in the Albury area that attract people to the area. When i say this i am not talking about events, but physical places to go. Having a world class gallery capable of holding world class exhibitions would go a long way. As a retailer in the central Albury area we are constantly being asked by families is there anywhere they can go whilst they are in the area and we constantly recommend visiting other places in the area, taking their money with them out of Albury. I would much prefer to keep their money here as well as attract others. Wouldn't it be nice for people visiting Rutherglen for events and work etc. to be recommended to visit Albury whist they were there, instead of the other way around?
As one of the highest rated towns in nsw i think it's time the councillors showed more economic prudence on behalf of the ratepayers.
As preschool teacher i visit the gallery with both our students and also with my grandchildren and friends. It is a beautiful space to introduce to young people and for them to learn that such spaces are not just for others, but a space they can also enjoy. They then have more of a connection with their city and the beautiful and diverse resources available for all.
As we only have one gallery- i think we should ensure it is up to date in terms of the quality of the facility and exhibitions on offer. The gallery is an important resource for the schools in the area.
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 21 February 2013
Other Comments
As with all govt spending there has been a large input of federal dollars over the past 3 - 4 years which has detrimentally effected all arms of future 'planned' funding with a number of projects having to be scaled back (or down) to assist with the ongoing 'repayment' of debt. The cost of the project may need to be revisited, as we all know, if it‟s a job for the government the big contractors you engage from the architects right through to the sparkies screwing in the light globes, all add at least 40% to everything. I would recommend, as with any project that has trouble getting funding, a short review of the plans to see if you really need the $1200 light fittings and the $600 sqm tiles....same as if i was building a house and can only get my hands on $300000 i don't still charge ahead and build the $500k house i want hoping that i can get some extra money before its finished... As with any rate/tax payers money, i am always very concerned at the seemingly lack of responsibility of employees at all levels when it comes to how often projects go over budget. There never seems to be any responsibility taken or consequences, other than increasing rates/charges.
Ask 100people on the street when was the last time they visited the art gallery.....90% will not be able to give you an answer please....spend money that you have on other projects, don't run the council into debt....look at Greece!
At a time when the council is applying to increase rates the maximum amount allowable to cover basic infrastructure maintenance and upgrades it seems unwise to go further into debt to fund a un necessary project with questionable value. At this point in the economic cycle council should be striving to minimise or eliminate entirely any rises in rates and charges. Despite government protestations to the contrary, the great majority of people outside of government employees (all three tiers) are doing it tough, and the indications are that both unemployment and living costs will rise further in the medium timeframe. In view of this i would suggest that now is not the time to be spending over $10 million on the art gallery, regardless of funding sources. There is already considerable evidence around Albury (street furniture, excessive signage etc) that there are a good deal of "make work" schemes in operation at ratepayer‟s expense. And even "empire building" within council departments. At this time the council and its resources would better utilised in debt reduction and other critical infrastructure. In my opinion such expenditure on such a project will not produce any increase of financial return (to acc directly). That is not to say all projects must be self-funding and produce a profit; however expenditure versus return on increased visitation hasn't been demonstrated in this case.
Before the council goes ahead there should be a vote by rate payers, as to should this go ahead, as we are the ones who end up paying more for our rates when council dose this spending?
Better things to spend money on that will benefit the whole community
Big debt for city with few of those footing the debt actually art gallery oriented
Both the art gallery and Lavington oval proposals should go ahead.
But i understand why the nsw government is not funding at present - it's broke!
Can council not put off some other works or projects and then ask the nsw govt to look at funding those instead - try asking for funding for critical infrastructure?
Can the Albury city council substantiate their claims that there is "overwhelming public support”? I am not convinced there is any support!
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 22 February 2013
Other Comments
Considering the population of Albury & Albury Wodonga in general, it is vital that we take a positive step to refurbish & extend such an important piece of art/culture infrastructure in this city. To wait is to turn our backs on the significance of the arts in the region and this would be unforgivable. When we consider the extent of gallery facilities in such cities as Bendigo & Ballarat, our present provision is very second class and accordingly short sighted as a major gallery in this city has huge potential to attract worldwide collections & thus support our economy. Please move on the project now as the funding shortfall is minimum in the total scheme
Convince local member his political future would be enhanced if we get the money.
Council and state funding for the regional gallery should at least be equal to the funding given by those government sectors to physical, which are all sporting activities over the last 5 years.
Council closed the ettamogah sanctuary. The council is trying to sell the uiver. The council is planning to sell the cumberooma. These attract visitors as well as provide facilities for locals. Let's face it very few people would gain benefit from an expanded art gallery. It will become, like the civic theatre, a white elephant.
Council have more important issues to contend with....street violence , crime in general , condition of some roads ,more bicycle paths, vacant shop fronts and commercial sites etc.
Council need to learn that ratepayers are the ones paying their wages and therefore as employers we need to be consulted more regarding big ticket items such as this. A council election doesn‟t mean a mandate to spend $7m furthermore councils $3.5 and the feds $3.5 would be more than enough to build this facility we do not need all the bells and whistles. Who are we competing with the joneses? Council need to learn to cut their cloth to suit their budget not continually look to ratepayers who are doing it tough and contrary to councils opinion do not have never ending supply of $$$$
Council needs to focus on critical areas like roads, water and sewer infrastructure rather than the art gallery, cumberoona and uiver
Council needs to refrain from additional borrowings as this causes increased costs to the rate payers
Council should looking at what the majority of ratepayers think their rates should be spent on and not bow to minority groups who get inside info supplied to them
Council should make it clearer to the ratepayers how other community plans and projects will be affected by an extra $3.5m contribution to the regional art gallery redevelopment. Given council's already high level of rates and ongoing deficit, further debt is a major issue facing the community. Lavington and Thurgoona need for development and services is a major reason for council to use the lack of funding for this project to explore a number of options so far not considered.
Council should not be making further contributions for this proposed project. The city cannot afford further borrowings.
Council should not rely on populist poll taking etc. to decide whether or not to update and maintain infrastructure. Rate payers will always be swayed by the "waste of money" argument and forget that tourism dollars eventually make their way into everyone's pocket. And no, i don't work at or have a vested interest in the art gallery or any related developer :) I‟m a local teacher.
Council should proceed immediately with the proposed development using existing development funds and deferring other non-essential works
Council should reconsider its decision and develop a vision of Albury as a centre of the arts.
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 23 February 2013
Other Comments
Councillors should and must make a decision and get on with the job and not stuff the community around.
Cultural development of this nature put locations like Albury on the "map" for tourism and enriches the lives of the people that live here. This type of development is essential.
Cultural infrastructure and events help bring professionals to live in Albury (such as ourselves). This is as much "lifestyle" as no traffic jams and house prices.
Culture is imperative to a vibrant healthy society.
Developments such as the art gallery are vital to the continued growth of our wonderful city. We need our council to work tirelessly to make both state and federal governments aware of our wonderful region and to ensure that Albury is developed as a vibrant regional city with a future that will encourage our children to stay in our region.
Did council ever receive any sort of commitment from the nsw state government that funding would be available? What other avenues is council pursuing for funding and at what cost?
Did the nsw liberal government ever make a 3.5m commitment to the project? If not, the project should be abandoned
Do not allow the development to proceed without state government contribution at the expense of other developments in the city. For example sporting facilities, bike paths etc.
Do not make it too modern
Does it mean qeii square will become smaller? I hope not... Not clear from the plans i saw online.
Don‟t go ahead with project unless council has nsw state government funding
Don‟t hand 3.5 mil back! Seek funding for other projects and infrastructure from nsw to make up short fall. Do the gallery!
Don't believe this is a project worth the council spending this amount of money. Roads, footpaths, parks. Sporting fields should all take precedence. Art galleries affect a minority.
Don't delay the project any further. You could risk losing it altogether.
Don't spend money we don't have. If we cannot afford a new gallery let's figure out how to achieve what we want some other way.
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 24 February 2013
Other Comments
Don't waste any more rate payer‟s money on this project!
Due to the present economic situation and the level of debt carried by council, it is just unaffordable and that is the bottom line of this debate. Ditch the whole idea.
Entering into even greater debt for an asset such as this & uiver that only a small proportion of community would use is not appropriate. Lower debt & lower rates should be the aim
Even though the proposed changes look lovely i think i would rather see the money spent or something that appeals to families as Albury is very limited in family activities
Every time we do a da we now pay council superannuation levy. Council rates are out of control. Who cares about an art gallery? Put something in that uses the river that could create tourism. Do not borrow any more money!!!!!!!!!!
Everything goes to the main street rather than spreading the tourist attractions around, Lavington and Thurgoona have many more rate payers that Albury city and they need more, and the centre has enough, give the majority something to show for the rates they pay. Exhibitions of other larger regional galleries often feature on television news programmes such as abc news as well as in important art publications sold in our national and state galleries. A larger gallery can exhibit larger and often more exciting exhibitions. I have lived here for just under two years and am impressed by the level of pride for the area amongst the residents here. A larger gallery with a restaurant would help to maintain that level of pride and confidence in Albury; it would also bring more people to it. I could not think of anything nicer than viewing an exhibition then talking it over with friends over lunch at a restaurant at the gallery. Albury is an important tourist area and would benefit largely from the expansion of the gallery, more people would be drawn to it. Also, money has i envisage already been spent on architectural drawings; is this to be wasted? Katherine hillier, splitters creek
Find some generous sponsors who will donate large financial input and in return may have a new room or hall etc named after them.
Finish our roads and footpaths first.
Fix infrastructure like roads and drainage. Keep rates down and stop wasting money on white elephants like cumberoona and uiver. Lend more support to youth centres like fruit fly circus
Fix the roads which are disgraceful. Give us a covered all year pool as wagga wagga have had for years. Save the uiver!! Think of the majority of ratepayers
For its size Albury is a cultural exhibition backwater. When one sees the art galleries and exhibitions that Bendigo, Ballarat and Benalla have and consider the new performance centre in Wangaratta it is embarrassing to be living in such a poorly serviced town. Albury has a vibrant artistic community that spends considerable sums visiting galleries in other towns due to the lack of significant exhibitions in their own. In addition to gallery fees these visits involve hotel and restaurant expenses. Not only is this expenditure lost to our town but even more importantly the absence of shows in Albury prevents the town from attracting visitors to its own businesses. The library museum has been a wonderful addition to the area and the proposed gallery redevelopment would further open up the cultural heart of the city and encourage the use of qe2 square for desirable community use rather than allow it to become a dangerous 'no go' zone as is happening at present.
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 25 February 2013
Other Comments
Forget the art gallery, the cumberoona & the uiver. Concentrate on infrastructure such as roads, sewerage upgrades & upgrading the waste management centre to modern day practices. People living in Hamilton valley expect a better quality of life, not having to put up with the unpredictable stench coming from the Albury tip. The management of the waste centre appears to be draconian compared to centres such as hunter valley & metropolitan centres. Our rates are continually going up for what purpose, to glorify the city centre! I think not. Have a reality check! From the plan i looked at the restaurant would be looking on to qeii square across st Matthews property, what will happen when they decide to develop or fence this area? Has there been consultation with st Matthews regarding this development. I believe we have far more pressing community needs than an upgraded art facility being touted by the arts community.
Fund a new upgraded swim centre with indoor pools for training, water-polo, and diving and wave pool. I suspect 80% of Albury population have not been to an art gallery
Funding should be moved to infrastructure like roads, better bus transportation, an increase in tourism
Get on with far more important community issues like sewerage and roads.
Get the roads fixed asap and the grasses cut everywhere within the council limits. Spend money on the essentials first
Given the size of Albury (Wodonga and surrounding towns) a "united" local government precinct is essential. The quality of the museum & library has shown a significant increase in patronage, and i believe this will do the same for the city. The development of the art gallery is certainly long overdue and the proposals submitted do link in all of the components very nicely. I would support this, even though I‟m not a user of the gallery, as it links the whole lga environment. I was initially opposed to the idea, as i didn't want to see Albury city become overburdened with additional loans as i believe the city owes more than enough already. If however the development can occur without taking out any additional loans, then council has my support.
Governments should help fund major infrastructure projects; however, i would not regard the current proposal as being a major infrastructure project when one considers the many other projects that the city needs to undertake.
Greater consideration needs to be given and a firm position taken to ensure the ongoing trading of the youth cafe.
Have visited current gallery - it was empty of people. Where do you propose to find the hundreds of visitors to justify spending $3.5 million of rate-payers money????
Having visited the Bendigo art gallery and being made extremely jealous, i am fully in favour and believe that the tourism and events trade will bring benefits to Albury
Help decentralise Australia! Grants and funding for projects like this are needed to improve the 'liveability' of inland cities.
Higher priorities for alb than art gallery redevelopment. Due to ato move without supporting car parking spaces, shopping/parking in Albury is a nightmare for business owners, central Albury citizens (not ato's fault)....also central/south freeway exits need redesign & rebuild to allow better traffic flow...get your priorities right please... How about reinstating yearly hard waste collections????? You cut it because you couldn't afford it. Yet now you want to borrow millions for a gallery??? Seems to me your taking a service away from those who have no other way to get excess rubbish removed so you can pay back a huge loan needed to provide a gallery to those who feel we need "arts".
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 26 February 2013
Other Comments
How does the council propose to protect the church land the gallery will be backing onto?
How does this extra $3.5m (or $7m in total ) compare to councils contribution to library museum and sporting venues etc., it may be useful to put it in context of past projects and also that there are several regional cities that have high calibre galleries (Newcastle, Ballarat, wagga etc. ) I (and young family) have only recently moved to Albury from Melbourne (6weeks) and the idea of having an art and cultural hub unmatched by any regional Australian city is very exciting! It seems strange that the nsw government provides incentives for young families to move to Albury yet will not support an art gallery redevelopment that would surely only be synergistic with their push to have young professionals move to regional centres such as Albury. I absolutely am against the council using my rate money for an art gallery that only a very very small minority of people use and actually take time to visit. Let the lefty arty fartys pay for it themselves. The amount of rates that i pay in forest hill is so expensive and get no more service than Lavington. I am finding it so hard to make ends meet and have full intentions of moving to vic in the near future I agree with the development, but not at the expense of more necessary project. 80,000 visitors a year is around 1 visit per person for the region - what increase in visitor numbers would you expect versus for the investment, and what flow-on benefit (financial or otherwise) would be gained by the increase in visitor numbers versus the investment.
I agree with the proposed development. The nsw government needs to have more media pressure placed on them to act. I am disappointed by this lack of pressure by local media.
I am a paid member of the ngv - perhaps there is a possibility for Albury gallery membership with discounts and attractions for members. I am not an Albury rate payer but am very supportive of regional arts and attend many Albury Wodonga events. Perhaps it should be called the Albury Wodonga regional art gallery so that Wodonga and victoria could support the project. The supporters of cultural events in our region are not bound by council boundaries.
I am a regular interstate visitor to Albury and always visit the gallery.
I am appalled to see that Albury city council are not resolved to pursue this opportunity to provide the community with potential exposure to arts and culture normally restricted to bigger cities. Look to Bendigo and recent exhibitions. Why is this an issue for council?
I am concerned about the increased debt should council go ahead without the nsw state government funding
I am disabled and cannot walk up those stairs; i would not miss anything that is going on if there was an elevator. Most country towns of our size and less have a decent art gallery; i have attended most of them.
I am in favour of art gallery redevelopment. It will attract tourism to our area. More so than cumberoona or uiva.
I am not at all in favour of this development. For one thing no parking, you are limited to the time you can park to go the library, which is why i cannot/never visit - no parking. You were donated the cumberoona after a lot of community work, that has been left to rot, because of council neglect, the same with the uiver, so why would i want to support something which is going to put council in debt beyond my lifetime (i am nearly 70) too many council attractions have been left to die, because of non-council support. I don't believe Albury city council wants tourism here, only as a hub for tourists to stay and visit all the outlying areas, which haven‟t got enough accommodation for people to stay, e.g. Rutherglen, Beechworth, and Yackandandah.
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 27 February 2013
Other Comments
I am not convinced that the art gallery is well patronised as i visit at least once a month and see only one or two people there. They do not make good use of the space that they have. If they have "valuable collections" why aren't they shown? The ken done exhibit has been on for two months, too long, let them run the gallery well before further money is spent art gallery is wise
I am strictly against going into debt for the new art gallery. Save up for it first. We pay enough in rates without further rises to cover this sort of debt.
I am supportive of the art gallery redevelopment as long as the retro youth cafe is retained and put into a central location.
I am sure that Albury‟s roads, water sewerage, waste management & hospital could all benefit far more from $6m. It's time council started looking at things that benefit the greater community rather than small minority groups.
I am very concerned that you are destroying the heritage aspect of these buildings. Your proposal completely destroys the front of burrows house and the rear of the art gallery.
I believe all council developments should be in keeping with the heritage of the building and not detract from this.
I believe an aquatic centre for Albury which would be open 12 months of the year would be of better benefit
I believe development of the regional art gallery should not be prioritised ahead of supportive services for youth mental health and suicide prevention such as the proposed "headspace" centre.
I believe it is very important for Albury to have a vibrant cbd with a mix of the arts available. An updated gallery will allow for more great exhibitions and increase tourism to the area.
I believe it is very important to develop the art gallery to assist with the encouragement of the arts to Albury and district. Any improved development would put Albury further on the map to enable people, both young and old, to be more educated and appreciate arts and associated activities. The development can only be an advantage to Albury and in association with the library-museum complex enabling promoting Albury as a major regional city. I believe more disabled people would feel more "in place" if they could enter the front door. I believe that the art gallery would be more seen as regional one, rather than an Albury gallery with development. Art is an important fundamental education the library museum is used more by Wodonga residents then their own library because it is better. Art students wanting a degree, travel to Albury for trainee-ships with the gallery staff because Albury/Wodonga has one of the best reputations a regional area has ever had in the art field. 3.5 million is a cost but it is the foundation of many better things to come.
I believe that it will be a significant project for the city the total value of which to our community will be greater than the sum of its parts, a visionary opportunity which will require bold steps to make it happen
I believe that the funds could be better spent on necessities rather than nice to have items with the economy in its current state.
I believe that the redevelopment would increase visitation of the art gallery by many residents such us school groups and the disabled community
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 28 February 2013
Other Comments
I believe that whilst 3.5 million is a large amount, the value to Albury of redeveloping the gallery is far greater. When i came to Albury from overseas it was Albury‟s reputation as Australia‟s fastest growing regional centre that drew us to the area. I think that signs of developing infrastructure and cultural projects are a huge draw to an area, and with Australia performing so well internationally, along with the rising cost of living in Melbourne (and the other large cities of Australia) Albury needs to stand out from other regional centres to attract migrants who are choosing regional Australia as their next destination. I believe that the gallery project and the work it would generate can only impact positively on the Riverina area of nsw. I believe that with the current financial status of australia and the world at large there are far more important issues to be dealt with such as health systems, the elderly, home services, and crime. We already have a wonderful art gallery and i cannot foresee any major benefits to such a costly upgrade.
I believe the art gallery will benefit a minority of the Albury residents as non of my relatives or acquaintances have indicated in conversations i have had that they are in any way interested in the art gallery either as it is now or as a new project.
I believe this is a wonderful project that will be extremely beneficial to our community and am supportive of it preceding whatever the cost.
I congratulate council on its visionary development of the Albury library museum. The redevelopment of the gallery would further enhance Albury's cultural offerings, benefitting both locals and tourists.
I do not believe ratepayers should be picking up the shortfall when there are other areas that need attention in Albury of what a council is actually there for. As we have seen no actual figures of costs and revenue that will benefit Albury with this upgrade i believe it is only being built for a small minority of Albury's elites egos. Don't know if you understand that a lot of people in our community are hurting big time with cost pressures and if you think that by adding to it is the way to go, get out and talk to people across all areas of Albury and reduce their rates instead. Putting out a limited question survey with a hidden agenda for the minority elite to load up and then believe it justifies the spending is questionable and sneaky. I do not believe the amount of public money that would be needed to build a project such as the art gallery, is a justified expense for the majority of the residents of Albury or surrounds - whether it is funded with government assistance or not. How many people would benefit from an art gallery? What percentage of the people in this area do you think would be utilizing such an extravagant expense? I feel the money could be better spent on projects that would assist more of the residents - such as upgrading/redeveloping sporting facilities (including an indoor heated pool).
I do not believe we need this costly redevelopment. There are more important areas council needs to spend rate payer‟s money in maintain and improving basic infrastructure.
I do not deem the spending of so much money, which will not be spent judiciously and productively (as all government spending) on an art gallery.
I do not regard an art gallery redevelopment any advantage to local or tourist interest at all. Only a local minority interest appears self-promotional. There are many other developments worthy of funding. We have a river in Albury. Look at other regional towns on the Murray for interesting development for public interest. I do not support such a huge amount of money being spent on the proposed art gallery redevelopment when so many roads, kerb and gutters, footpaths, drains and trees require urgent maintenance to bring them back to an acceptable standard. If the project was fully funded by the governments concerned i might support some redevelopment but not $10.5m as this figure is ridiculous and knowing councils habit of grossly over expending on major projects, the figure quoted would go over again.
I do not want Albury city council to commit any more of our money to this project. I think there are many other projects more important than this one.
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 29 February 2013
Other Comments
I don‟t see it as necessary and the large sum of money could be spent elsewhere. I don't like that the redevelopment will relocate the youth cafe.
I don't believe there is a need to redevelop the art gallery, i don't think enough people are interested, and i do not think the visitation would increase all that much if it was redeveloped.
I don't believe this project is essential at this time. Council should continue to seek funding from the state government and only when that is received should the project go ahead.
I don't support council investing an additional $3.5m on this project. State govt support should make up the difference.
I don't understand why it needs upgrading?? Money can be better spent elsewhere, i.e. health, the head space and other community based programs.
I don't understand why the nsw government refuses to make any contribution at all. You would think they could contribute something!
I doubt that it will provide more jobs locally. Should the art gallery expand to this level, staff with more experience than those locally will move to the area to manage it, unless there is a policy to employ locally?
I feel our rates money could be better spent on other projects
I feel sure the money could be better spent in are hospitals, something that would benefit more people,
I feel that Albury council should get its priorities right! What about our historic items that encourage tourism, by that i mean the uiver and cumberoona. Let‟s get these going first!!!!!! They will encourage tourists to our area, where the art gallery will not to the same extent.
I feel that council should be applying more pressure on the nsw government especially through our local member who clearly has the right contacts in government. What is mr aplin's position on the tripartite funding agreement for the art gallery project? How hard is he lobbying his colleagues?
I feel that having a strong and vibrant arts centre is imperative in a regional centre such as ours. Not only does it attract tourists but provides a strong educational experience for our youth. The fact that it would enable 'things of beauty' to inspire and uplift me is an added bonus. :-)
I feel that the redevelopment of the art gallery will be a great asset to Albury city and its community. The redevelopment aligns with the community strategic plan in that it will attract tourists to the region; it will fit with the cbd strategy and qeii square master plan. I feel the current gallery is perfectly adequate. For the council to spend $7million on something that interests a very small proportions of the population i feel is a gross mismanagement of rate payer‟s money. And no I‟m not totally uncultured to have this opinion. I attend virtually every musical event in our city but along with dare i say the bulk of the population art galleries are not where we choose to spend our time. Spend the $7million on something that interests a wider cross section of the population.
I feel the money could be better spent elsewhere, e.g., rectifying dangerous trees in our parks as apparently park staff are unable to even respond to rate payers concerns
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 30 February 2013
Other Comments
I feel the money could be spent better elsewhere.
I feel the nsw government need to be lobbied to provide the extra funding
I feel the redevelopment would be a major boost for tourism for Albury - an opportunity that should not be missed.
I feel we should be encouraging activities that would draw tourists such as a red neck mud park instead of an art gallery that can never match Melbourne or Sydney
I get disappointed when cultural development is 'put on the back burner' so to speak, when sporting infrastructure goes ahead without hesitation. I feel we need to develop and nurture the arts in regional and capital cities in Australia. I happy support the redevelopment of the redevelopment of the art gallery however, i would like to see the that the retro youth cafe gain just as much support to find a new location. Young people are the future of our community and there are over 8, 000 thousand young people living in Albury and there are limited activities already.
I have been in Albury for 40 years and have never been to the art gallery. There are not enough paintings and things of interest there
I have just returned from 14 weeks in Europe where arts and cultural events attract enormous crowds of both locals and tourists. By developing the art gallery we can only create a win-win situation. A local user friendly venue and a top showpiece for the city. I can‟t see why we are hesitating. I have visited the Bendigo art gallery for its haute couture exhibition, wedding dresses exhibition, the Grace Kelly exhibition and the writers‟ festival. I would love for Albury to have a gallery that could provide this level of arts culture. My money would be staying in Albury and the increase in tourism would benefit the community. We need this gallery redevelopment to become an area of arts, culture, food and wine and believe that the nsw state government should fund it. The local council should proceed with the extension even if the nsw state government doesn‟t fund it.
I hope the complex features lots of greenery where possible and have a cafe.
I live in Deniliquin and Albury is my nearest regional gallery. I personally visit but have also used the gallery for primary school excursions for our remote schools (Blighty/Mayrung/Conargo) and we very much support this gallery and the education/exposure to children it provides.
I love visiting the art gallery
I moved to Beechworth in the north east two years ago and have become a regular visitor to the Albury regional art gallery, where i have enjoyed exhibitions. I congratulate the gallery on the standards and nature of the exhibitions and hope that the support of the town residents in the region is valuable to the cause. I am already receiving regular emails from the gallery staff. I pay rates and if getting this means paying more rates then i don't want this for Albury. Money would be better spent on attractions that are more likely to bring visitors such as developing the land along the river, bike trails and bike hire as they have in Melbourne everywhere or a water park. This art gallery is a desire for a very small minority. The cost of living has really gotten out of hand; raising rates for capital for something not asked for by the people of Albury will result in uproar in the community, and personally infuriates me. Ask Albury people what they want if you have money to spend don't go telling us you're raising rates because someone went and got a grant assuming you could just take the additional funding from rate payers!
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 31 February 2013
Other Comments
I really appreciated the background information on the project. It was readable, concise and thorough. It answered all my questions. I think that enhancing the potential for international exhibitions is significant factor.
I reject the falsely made assertion reported in the media that the current Albury council has an electoral mandate to carry out this work. This issue was not canvassed (to my knowledge) by any candidates in the recent election
I strongly agree that the council should pursue deadline. I don't understand how the council can have cash reserves when it is in debt for money already borrowed?! Mind you, i do love the library museum and was always in favour of this. Today, the economic climate is different.
I struggle as it is to pay council rates ... I would not want to have to pay more to fund the gallery. I feel there are more important issues anyway.
I support the initiative but fear the impact on rates & other expenditure if the council move forward without exploring other opportunities for funding, 3.5 is a big amount to take on solo, without guarantee of revenue coming from the new art gallery back into the local area... I thing this redevelopment would be of significant benefit to the city of Albury - in particular, if a person is not 'sports orientated' there are not many activities to generate interest in the area (indoors). Albury are fortunate to have a dedicated arts population (i.e. Drama, music and 'arts' - this redevelopment would be of great benefit for all of these activities and give a wonderful opportunity for students at schools to have a significant gallery for all the community. I think $3.5 million is enough for the council to contribute. I am not in favour of us spending $7 million for an art gallery - there are more important things to spend that amount of money on. I would prefer the cumberoona to be supported in preference to the extra $3.5 million being spent on an art gallery
I think a redeveloped art gallery is vital for the health of the community in all senses.
I think Albury city should concentrate on it financial position rather than spending more on arts
I think Albury's cultural and arts community needs this.
I think it is a brilliant opportunity to really give the art gallery a fresh start and introduce it to a new generation and to encourage frequent patron ship
I think it is a wonderful design. Please do everything to get it built. I am very fond of the library/museum. A concourse between the two would be wonderful for me as i am partly disabled.
I think it is important for Albury to have a venue that can have local, national and international exhibitions.
I think it is important that we use every avenue to force the nsw state govt to contribute to this project and to other regional infrastructure. We need to also be pressing to have the very fast train project commenced and speed up the nbn and digital radio.
I think it is the biggest waste of money. The money would be better spent on the youth of Albury. Redevelop the retro youth cafe. There would be more people use this than an art gallery!!
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 32 February 2013
Other Comments
I think it would be more important to leave the art gallery as it is redirect the funds towards more important things like maybe: some barricades on the union bridge to stop people jumping of it, maybe injecting some funds into Lavington and north Albury to stop businesses closing down or moving into central Albury, some family friendly(child safe) access to the river apart from noeriul park, some funding for sporting groups(apart from wealthy o&m teams) so that they don't have to sell alcohol from their canteens and thus have intoxicated adults around young children, or maybe even some foot paths. And that's just of the top of my head. I think it would be very irresponsible for the council to go ahead and incur such a massive debt in today's uncertain economic climate. I would not like to see a repetition of the financial problems experienced by the relevant council due to the development of the glasshouse entertain centre in Port Macquarie.
I think it's a terrific use of the heritage buildings and will complement the library museum perfectly as well as open up qe2 square. It's in the long term interest of the city
I think it's a waste of money for the minority of people who attend. The council would be better off subsidising a bus or train fares to the national gallery in Canberra or the national gallery of victoria in Melbourne when they have their exclusive exhibitions. My wife and i try to attend whenever possible. I think it's extremely important the redevelopment is done sooner than later. Albury is a regional city with enormous potential to attract new residents to the area to live as well as tourists. Residents move out of the capital cities if they feel they can get the facilities of the city and the benefits of country life. Albury is developing, even more so over the past few years into one of those desirable places to live. While our city is growing our current gallery is stagnant and noncompliant to standards restricting many exhibitions being able to be presented. Upgrading our gallery to an international standard will encourage international exhibitions which then have the capacity to bring thousands of tourists to the city and make the region even more attractive as a place to live. All this benefits the city in many other ways. I am a rate payer in both Albury and Wodonga and although i would prefer the rates to not increase, if it meant the gallery redevelopment could go ahead, I‟d be happy to pay a small increase. I'm sure the gallery would be able to recoup the extra funds in time through the extra visitors to the venue.
I think money and time could be better spent on helping our kids future i.e. Headspace not an art gallery
I think that as a ratepayer i do not use the art gallery and would not be using it in the future as my life is too busy, so i should not have to pay extra rates when i am not interested in such a venture, especially when the council continues to do very little for us and has removed certain policies in the past few years, like the hard waste collection
I think that in the current economic situation council should not be borrowing money especially for something like this that benefits a minority of the region.
I think that ratepayer‟s money could be better spent on other projects, rather than something not everyone will use.
I think that the arts should be supported. It is also important to have a decent facility to display events. It is also very good to attract visitors to the region.
I think that the redevelopment would bring more money into Albury and contribute to Albury being known in the region as a cultural destination.
I think that this is a wonderful opportunity for Albury to go into the future with a really worthwhile project that will enhance the spectacular library/museum facility. The money may not be in the future.
I think the council is doing the right thing in not placing further financial burden on its ratepayers. If anything, the money should be spent on a new indoor pool, such as the facilities provided at the Wodonga sports and leisure centre. I feel this would be more utilised by residents of Albury than a redeveloped art gallery.
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 33 February 2013
Other Comments
I think the council should consider spending more money on cycle tracks and the uiver before redeveloping the art gallery.
I think the council should look at the old wool store as a gallery site, Geelong and la Trobe university have created a stunning space with a historical slant, a modern monstrosity is unnecessary. We need to preserve and adapt our beautiful existing buildings so in the future we can look with pride at gracious architecture. I also think the council should consider an indoor pool prior to the arts, just see how many people swim every morning. I think the gallery is big enough as it is and i don‟t spending more money on it is necessary especially when there is more pressing issues such as roads footpaths and gutters .we could have spent the money on some of our tourist attractions like the ettamogah pub & wild life sanctuary the uiver and the cumberoona. Now we‟re do we take our visitors out of town. I don‟t think as rate payers spending money on the art gallery for a few people to look at is value for our dollars.
I think the money could be put to other needy projects
I think the redevelopment is a great idea, but, not at this time due to the current high pressures on families to meet their present financial commitments - council should be finding ways of reducing rate burdens, not spending more money.
I think there are more important things for the council to spend money on rather than the minority interested in art
I think this development is essential to the growth of Albury as a city; an excellent regional gallery will attract major exhibitions encouraging visitors to our city and therefore prosperity for other businesses.
I think this project is very important culturally for our city. However, i believe council could meet a host of other needs within our community using the additional $3.5m. Those funds really ought to come from the state government. I think this project is very important. A good example of the interest that it could attract to the region is that of Bendigo. They have very good events and tourists go to the city for a weekend visit from all over the state. Also, the library/museum attracted a lot of criticism at the time it was built, not it is a feature of Albury and is the envy of large towns and cities such as wagga. Albury does not spent terribly much on cultural venues, the citizens are missing out, and we are also missing out on tourist trade.
I think this project should be put on hold unless they secure funding from the state government
I think we are so fortunate to have an art gallery in this city and i feel grateful and inspired whenever i visit. I am sure the redevelopment will mean even more opportunities for artists of all kinds to showcase their work.
I think we need other things with money spent on sports fields as we don't have enough also roads and footpaths
I think we need to upgrade but not if this means a rise in our rates, as they are too high as it is
I thought Albury citizens had already voted to go ahead with this - but i may have misunderstood - i believe Albury should have a better gallery with the potential for larger & fund raising shows.
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 34 February 2013
Other Comments
I travel to Canberra and Melbourne to visit the travelling exhibitions. I would much prefer to be able to spend my money locally. If the gallery had better facilities and more space it would be in a better position to exhibit a wider range of local and international works.
I understand the Albury city put the submission in late, thus obviously a problem
I visit Albury about once a month and always call in at the4 gallery a new art gallery will give Albury a bit of a face lift and attract more visitor's i do think the gallery needs to be advertised more as while in Albury i often mention to people i am going to visit the gallery and may locals tell me they have never been I visit Albury art gallery regularly as i am on emailing list. It badly needs to be brought up to speed with other regional art galleries. We visit regional art galleries whenever we travel. Bendigo art gallery is an excellent example of a great economy boost to that city. Cultural facilities, capable of bringing major exhibitions to Albury, are badly needed. Albury needs a major tourist boost.
I visit the art gallery fairly often to see whatever displays are available. I was there this week and as usual there was just one other person viewing the works. There is no call for Albury city council to upgrade the existing facility.
I visit wagga a couple of times each year to visit the galleries there and am always amazed at the superior quality of their exhibitions and facilities. It is time Albury had something like this to offer its citizens.
I want infrastructure to support expanding Albury, i.e. footpaths etc. and programs to make me feel safer and greener
I wish to see the Drysdale collection permanently on display
I wonder why we even have to do a questionnaire about this. It's disappointing and feels kind of back-water country hicksville for the proposal to be hindered. Regional shouldn't have to mean second rate or underfunded.
I would be very pleased if the Albury city council completed the project.
I would dearly love to see the redevelopment go ahead but the nsw government needs severe lobbying as it has an obligation to support art and culture in the state. Disgrace to O‟Farrell
I would like council to spend my money on essential services (for example we live in a new area but have no footpaths), rather than spending it on an art gallery which, from my observation, is not frequented by a large percentage of residents. I would like to commend all the staff of Albury city council who has worked on this mammoth project to date. I can't imagine how frustrating it must be to have presented so many reports, budgets and plans for this exciting and enthusiastic project, only to be thwarted time and time again. The time to act is now. It is clear that the community wants and needs this development. Make Albury proud and pursue this cultural development now.
I would like to know more about the impact on delivery of other planned projects, particularly what projects are currently scheduled and how their timelines would shift.
I would like to see at the very least the facade of the retro youth cafe building preserved. Albury city council has allowed too many older and historical buildings be demolished. The streetscape in that section of dean street should be preserved as much as possible.
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 35 February 2013
Other Comments
I would like to see the entrance into the old town hall retained as an entrance
I would like to see the government put up the money it said it would as a ratepayer i do not feel that we should be given an added burden to our rates at this time
I would like to see the new gallery support local artists- especially local indigenous artists.
I would never go to an art gallery, and do not support the proposed new development - i believe it is only for a small minority of locals and money should be spent in more appropriate areas
I would not like to see the council borrow money to complete this project and therefore the possibility of increasing the rates on all properties. The amount of money to be provided by the council could be better spent on projects that all ratepayers could benefit from. E.g. Roads or footpath improvement/maintenance
I would not support the council having to inject more funds into the project - nsw govt funding must be the priority.
I would prefer council to spend funds on this project rather than the cumberoona.
I would rather see a more family friendly tourist 'icon' go ahead instead. An art gallery is a great idea for the community, but i feel it only interests part of the community. Why not spend the millions on developing our Murray river to attract visitors.
I would rather see the money spent on an indoor aquatic centre used 364 days per year. This would be used more regularly by more residents than the arts gallery. It would provide a fitness/sporting venue in contrast to a static arts centre. Sell the artwork and we won‟t need it displayed. Problem solved.
I would rather see the money spent on the art gallery rather than wasting it in uiver or cumberoona which seem to nothing more the waste of money.
I would think that there are more worthy causes than an art gallery that has limited exposure and popularity.
I would urge Albury city to approve the redevelopment to benefit Albury and the surrounding community. Obviously if we decide not to take up the funding offer it may be withdrawn and not given again.
I‟ve no intention of visiting now or if it goes ahead. Rather preserve the uiver
Ice cream castles are for the urban areas
I'd be interested to know if there could be a more economical option to the redevelopment. I'd like to know if it is an environmentally sustainable development. I am an artist myself, i am excited that people are passionate about showcasing art and appreciating it but i also believe people in the art world are generally not materialistic people who require expensive forums to showcase their work.
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 36 February 2013
Other Comments
I'd like to see the current facade of burrows house is retained. Possibly relocated to another site to create a future facade of another building as it is quite a beautiful building that is much an asset to Albury‟s aesthetics as the crowne building and art gallery building. Perhaps the facade could be used elsewhere in the cbd to house a new location for the youth cafe, as it is also a vital part of living for the youth of Albury to have a trendy place to visit. I'd like to see the redevelopment put on the back burner and the money used to fund more important things like a centralised mental health service that could facilitate a headspace centre and could also house the retro youth cafe.
If Albury / Wodonga are going to remain an exciting, forward thinking and culturally rich environment to live then the redevelopment must proceed in order to attract fist class exhibitions and increase tourism. We must keep up with our competitors.
If Albury city doesn't pursue this development of the regional gallery, tourism will be drawn to other regional centres and Albury‟s standing amongst the other major regional centres will slowly be diminished.
If council contributes the additional $3.5 million, other projects will have to wait.
If council has a spear 3.5m it should be using it on more substantial projects.
If funding can be found without increasing rates or levies from the ratepayers of Albury go ahead, if this cannot be accomplished then shelve the project.
If it‟s not done now it will only get more expensive. Remember that by-pass? And then we will have to settle for second/third best. We are a safe seat remember! I am also thinking of other projects too.
If nothing else is done please build a lift to give access to the upstairs room for mobility impaired people
If the council can't find funding to keep the cumberoona and uiver plane going and the roads are a mess there are more pressing areas that $3.5 million could be spent? We don't need extra debt. I do think the art development should go ahead when funding is secured from other areas.
If the council does not get the funding from the government and does not have the money put aside before committing to projects they should not increase costs such as rates etc to cover the costs.
If the development will attract so many visitors, then set it up as a private organisation. It will be a burden on most ratepayers for the benefit of a few. Council already has too much debt, and would do better concentrating on core services.
If the project requires demolition of the old court house you need to rethink the design.
If the redevelopment were to look anything like in the picture above, i think that the council would be ruining a cool part of dean st, which has a few heritage buildings which go well with the current gallery. If you put in what is in the picture above it will be an embarrassment to the council and heritage council and i will move from Albury
If this project is half as successful as the library/museum it will be a great asset for Albury
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 37 February 2013
Other Comments
If you drive around Albury streets then you will find a lot more important areas that need money spent on
Ii think the art gallery is fine as it is and feel that mixing it with modern buildings spoils another piece of local history...... also i feel there are other infrastructure needs that this sort of money could be spent on...... a small but much needed project would be to make all pedestrian crossings the same, every time i go to cross a road i suffer an anxiety attack...... why not be the same as the rest of the country...the crossings in swift street near centro are an example ...... both completely opposites...just a few thoughts .....have a nice day :) I'm disillusioned that the council is willing to partly destroy the existing building the gallery is housed in!! Not to mention the building next door! We need to keep historical buildings not pull them down!!!I am dubious on the amount of "extra" holiday makers this would attract. An increase on $3.5m will keep the cumberoona going for 35years according to the yearly costs council gave me on the paddle steamer. This so called "tourist mecca" will only be limited to a select few who would visit galleries, regardless of what special exhibits it may or may not attract... I am born and bred here, i, along with everyone i know, is not in support of this! The council flyers show a very one sided argument in favour of the extra funding. One would say it is a fore gone conclusion, with these forums a feel good activity for the council! What guarantee do i have this will be read by actual councillors who would vote on this???? I'm not at all sure about the new facade to the existing old court house - if it can be retained within the new structure i would find that quite acceptable. I believe that a well-serviced coffee-shop/restaurant is an essential, and one which should have been implemented (not just provided for) in the library museum. I don't like the thought of increased debt and probable increases in council charges to all ratepayers, even though the likelihood of this has been denied, however the success of the library museum counteracts that concern. Just make sure that there really is space for all the things that the various groups need to maintain their activities and interests.
I'm sure there is only a need for one art gallery in Albury. There are other areas which require council support before another art gallery
In addition to the funding by the rate payer of a 3.5, there is the added cost of the relocation of the retro youth cafe. Given the current financial position and the costs to rate payers it is both inappropriate and unrealistic to expect rate payers to pay for these improvements when they are meeting the needs of Albury residents already.
In an unsure economic environment have to consider if 3.5k could be better spent in the health system i.e. Albury base is a disaster waiting to happen , emergency department to small & understaffed, more important to give nurses & doctors a safe well equipped department to work from.
In keeping with the theme of revitalization, modernity, and development, it may be important that the restaurant/cafe have a theme complimentary to the art gallery--vegan, organic, gluten-free are themes that may appeal to the types of people looking for a high-standard public establishment.
In relation to q4. Albury has had more than its fair share of state funding, esp. In regards to the library museum. Time for other regional centres to benefit.
In the current economic climate it would appear foolish to invest in such a non-essential project. There are other communities‟ projects that are needed before the art gallery redevelopment. Stop pandering to minority interest groups and get some common sense. A new pool development at Lavington if done properly would bring significant visitor numbers to Albury, many more than the art gallery. Just look at the visitors the hockey fields, tennis courts and basketball stadium being to the region. A quality new sporting pool at Lavington would see this area attract large sporting competitions. In the current state of essential costs of living out stripping the average person‟s budget i believe that more attention should be given to updating the city‟s infrastructure before any more large expenditure is started. As a rate payer this will do nothing to hold future increases to a manageable level. As it is the yearly increases are way above the cpi which i believe should be the indicator as to how much extra we should pay. Let‟s face it the tip supposedly runs at a profit but each year there is always a substantial increase in our garbage collection rates for example.
In the present financial climate i don't think the council should fund this project
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 38 February 2013
Other Comments
Is there a backup plan for a budget blowout on this project?
It appears that another old part of Albury will be destroyed at the expense of local rate payers rates, the return on investment will be very and probably never exceed the annual interest bill
It concerns me that the retro youth cafe is compromised. It would make sense to have it factored into the design of the redevelopment; it and a little performance space. Secondly, I‟ve heard the cost of meals at the redevelopment eateries will be around the $25-35 for lunches. In my experience visiting countless galleries across Europe, and regularly in London, that people are prepared to pay a little extra for their coffee/cake/lunch if the atmosphere/physicality is wonderful and you're lost in the surrounds. I won't pay $30 for a lunch, and i live centrally and often pop into library museum/retro/gallery etc. Don't budget on expecting thousands of people extra every year buying these meals - assuming my sources are accurate of course.
It is a fantastic idea, great to see council investing in our town's infrastructure and being proactive to develop our cultural and tourism clout.
It is a great venue that other regional towns do not have and it should move with the times
It is a must for the community, a great way to promote our city
It is a regional facility so the region should all pay the only way to do this fairly is for the nsw to chip in their $2.5m share
It is a wonderful idea to develop a cultural centre, quality art gallery which attracts tourism and enhances cultural development. The library museum's success is encouraging. The predicted 80,000 annual visitors (219 per day) would be great but i have concerns about it eventuating. My major concerns are the impact on other projects in Albury that will have to be placed on hold. The reprioritising of capital works in other areas means that these necessary developments will be halted. How does the importance of these other projects match that of the art gallery? How long have these other projects been waiting for completion? The other expense not mentioned is the relocation of the retro youth café.
It is an important part of Albury‟s cultural growth. Also important to maintain pace with other similar size regional cities
It is crucial that the regions of Australia are well funded for community projects. Access to the arts is essential for a healthy well balanced community.
It is honestly a waste of time and money. Upgrading the art gallery will barely if at all impact the community. Council should be more focused on bringing in revenue e.g.: the cumbaroona and maintain what we already have what we lack. We will no longer have a decent venue for youths or somewhere to host regular youth friendly events. Stop wasting money and focus it on building a better future for the youths of this town instead of focusing on your own selfish wants.
It is important that council proceeds with the project while continuing to lobby the nsw state government.
It is important that project like this continue to give the city a purpose to visit, stay. Conference etc.
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 39 February 2013
Other Comments
It is not possible to make a meaningful judgement without looking at a comprehensive list of funding priorities - perhaps even including some north of guinea street!!!
It is ok for the fed government to promise $3.5 million - all this talk about nsw being broke is untrue - so if they can't come up with their share - i don't think the ratepayers of Albury should foot the bill. It would be different if the art gallery had scores of people going though each day - but it doesn't (each time i go in there -the only person i see is the lass sitting behind the desk) i feel the money could be more wisely spent on things that really matter in this city. It is sad that the state government will not provide their share of the funding, but i fully support the council providing the additional funds to ensure the redevelopment. Perhaps there is also the possibility of commercial contributors as well? Having an excellent art collection puts your city on the map. The only reason i go to Benalla with my friends and family is because of their amazing art collection and gallery. It is so important to improve the place of art in our society. Wagga wagga is leaving us behind. We have spent so much on sport in the past and it is now time to balance this with dedication to arts development here. We need to do this for us and our children.
It is so important to promote and cultivate our creative arts for the present and for future generations.
It is the quality of the exhibitions that draw the public, and while i understand supporters of this project will say the new building will encourage more exhibitions, i am not so sure. Let the arts world look to raise the necessary funds if they believe this is a worthwhile project. Albury has far more important considerations for its cash than spending $7 million of our hard to come by dollars on this project. I like an overwhelming majority of rate payers oppose this wasteful spending.
It is very important as a major gallery is an important community asset as well as a national and regional tourist attraction
It is very important to support regional galleries because they support emerging and mid-career artists, intern there is a relationship that is built, the divide between cities and regions narrowed. The importance of cultural assets cannot be understated, in Tasmania the impact of Mona, on the art scene, tourism and the way the island sees its self is quite phenomenal. It looks like a lot of other projects and the greater community will miss out on funding so the small art fraternity can get a new gallery. Doesn't the council vote stand for anything these days or has the mayor taken it upon herself to pursue the matter. She needs to think about what will benefit the greater community and not just the arty farties.
It may seem like a lot of money but you have to look long term. What kind of city do we want for the future? Albury needs things like this if we're going to stay relevant
It seems vital that n.s.w. contribute one third costs. How can they be persuaded? A performance at the gallery?
It should be funded on usage. If the facility is not attended often it should not get major funding like this.
It the council do not secure alternative funding the development should not go ahead.
It will be a boon to the regional area, as has been the library/museum.
It will be a magnet for visitors to frequent, and i sue Bendigo art gallery and Ballarat gallery as examples, build it promote it and they will come.
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 40 February 2013
Other Comments
It will be hard initially but the long term benefits will be well worth the sacrifice. Without the federal money there will be little or no chance of achieving this important development.
It will help redefine qeii square as an arts & cultural precinct and will generate revenue in years to come with national and regional exhibitions on tour. Go for it!
It would be a great facility and for our culturally diverse community and absolute boost.
It would be a great pity, if the project would not go ahead and it would reflect the materialism of the people, not being prepared to support something that will be enjoyed by future generations.
It would be extremely disappointing if the council pulled out of this valuable project. The councillors need to support this project even if it means providing the extra funding without the state government. The project will provide so much to Albury- tourism, economy etc. Albury has a fantastic sporting scene, so let‟s concentrate some resources into the arts and culture as these are just as important to our community as sports. I urge the new council to do the right thing by the Albury community- don't deny us a vibrant, nationally recognised cultural precinct. It is so important.
It would be fantastic if the gallery could house more touring art exhibitions such as those presented in Bendigo, for my own and my family's benefit and to attract tourism to Albury.
It would ensure that Albury would become an important regional centre of the visual arts and design - raising the profile of the city on a national context.
It‟s a great idea.....look at the Bendigo art gallery and the wonderful exhibitions they provide and what a bonus to the town!!!
It‟s important to chase funding for arts in the region for the arts to improve and to have an art gallery to be proud of which would be able to house exhibitions that don‟t normally come to the area in a safe and protected environment.
It's a good idea. Make it happen.
It's an exciting progression for Albury
It's an investment in the future of Albury and would provide social, cultural and economic benefits to the community.
It's important to remember it's a 'regional' art gallery.
It's one of the best regional galleries we have visited, the staff are lovely and it is a great place to stop on our way to melbourne.
Just do it. The arts deserve as much funding as sporting facilities.
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 41 February 2013
Other Comments
Just get it done! The facilities are laughable for a city the size of Albury. This new council should be delivering vision and leadership, not holding Albury back. To give back $3.5 million of federal funds in a safe electorate is insane. This is what i pay my rates for.
Just get on with it
Keep the retro cafe please.
Let the users pay a contribution.
Let‟s not spend above our means.
Let's make the decision and get on with it.
Like all of us, council needs to live within its means and stop treating ratepayers like cash cows. While this redevelopment is important to our city it should not be at the expense of ratepayers. To say it will have no impact on rates is a furphy as we all pay in the end! Our rates are already far too high.
Live within your means like everyone else has to! Scale the project back if need be.
Lobbying state government is very important, even if they provide partial funding with the balance coming from investment from the private sector
Look at kava coffee shop in Lavington for ideas regarding great decor incorporating art works
Looking to cultural centres for ideas; e.g. Street scaping, dining options, prints available in store
Lots of other projects need to have $3.5m spent on them before the art gallery. Full sewerage for Lavington, sealing of dirt roads in the Lavington area, street lighting in the Lavington area, all these problems are within three minutes driving of Lavington square.
Luxury and discretionary items are things that you spend money on when times are good. If you don't have the money don't spend it. Thank goodness the state govt is taking that position whether we like it or not.
Maintain the facade of burrows house in the Albury regional art gallery redevelopment.
Maitland, half the size of Albury, has an excellent new gallery that is putting life into the city. Albury really needs a top gallery. We need to give people a reason to visit Albury.
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 42 February 2013
Other Comments
Money better spent on tourism
Money can be better spent elsewhere, ie: better parking at the Murrumbeena centre
Money should be better spent on education and resources of young children in preschools and occasional childcare centre
Money would be better spent on roads etc. that would benefit more citizens.
Money would be better spent on roads, footpaths & hard waste collection
Money would be better spent on roads. I have also heard that our sewerage/drainage systems are ready for an update, so money would be better spent on this. These two projects would be for the betterment of all citizens, not just a minority who use the gallery facilities.
More effort and time should be spent on historic part of the district, the past is a link to today, if we look back and see a void, and we will have an empty heart. Art is not for everybody. History belongs to all.
More money should be spent on hospitals
More urgent works to be done i would not object to a smaller and cheaper gallery
Must go ahead, or be left in a backwater city. Can modify , use government assistance
My only concern is the fate of the retro cafe which has been a great success for Albury youth.
My responses are negative because i believe residents would have to pay higher rates than we do currently. We are already one of the highest rated cities in nsw, broken hill being the highest i believe.
No need for any more community consultation. That costs more money, and has already been done. Just get on with it.
Not at this stage.
Not at this time
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 43 February 2013
Other Comments
Not happy at all about losing burrows house. Once again losing our history to glass and concrete.....incredibly ugly...no soul and again like the other end of town loosing the ambiance of the city
Not in favour of proposed redevelopment proceeding whilst postponing stage 2 of Albury emergency management centre. Fail to understand priorities of federal/state & local governments - willing to possibly let people/communities be devastated by natural/man-made disasters so as to ensure same can appreciate the "arts"????? Typical of politicians/bureaucrats!!!!
Not supporting the redevelopment will cause Albury to culturally stagnate as everyone else keeps moving forward!
Not sure it could attract the exhibitions or attendances to justify the expense
Now is not the time to ask the ratepayers to pay for this, there are a lot of people out there who have enough difficulty coming up with the rates payments as they are without increasing them for non-essentials
Nsw govt is unnecessarily cutting so many jobs (especially with the formation of the new local land services), that $3.5m could keep a lot of good people providing valuable services to the state. Also rate payers should not provide the $3.5m needed.
Of course the nsw govt should fund more cultural things in regional nsw. The city (Sydney) gets everything. Council should build it anyway as there is funding from the feds for $3.5m - don't hand it back.
Only go ahead with redevelopment with no borrowings or rate increases!
Other areas need attention besides central Albury.
Our community at st Paul‟s college in Walla Walla would like to join with the arag redevelopment community and provide workshops out at st paul's in collaboration with the art gallery to educate our local community.
Our rates have gone up enough without having to pay for a art gallery that would not be used by everybody in the community
Perhaps the council should stop 'empire' building and apply greater attention to funding community programs to assist people of all ages and economic situations. Art is lovely but the expense is like buying a brand new Mercedes when you can only afford a second hand Hyundai.
Perhaps the plans will need to be modified to be able to afford the project
Philanthropy should be pursued. I definitely would not like to see this work done at the expense of the emergency management centre.
Plans look good. Would be great to have the gallery more accessible for people with limited mobility.
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 44 February 2013
Other Comments
Please do it.
Please do not spend ratepayer‟s money to build new monuments. This whole affair smacks of delusions of grandeur that management has used consultants to try and justify instead of manning up and doing their own justification. For things like the art gallery, do the best with what you have and remember you can never compete with the major galleries in Sydney, Melbourne and Canberra. People wanting to visit art galleries will preferentially go to those much more substantial galleries. Whether an art gallery qualifies for government infrastructure funding depends on the definition of infrastructure used. A gallery is discretionary infrastructure and should not qualify as a priority. I suggest the ceo and his subordinates that spent money on consultants have by so doing proved they do not know how to do their jobs. Get rid of them. Ban the use of all "business" style consultants forthwith and have managers and councillors take responsibility instead of covering backsides by using consultants to say what management wants or already knows but is too afraid to say or act on.
Please don't miss this opportunity. Look at the cube! This is for all the citizens of Albury.
Please ensure council steps up and funds this vital infrastructure. The state never realises its responsibility and will only ever cost shift.
Please go ahead with the project
Please go ahead with this project, it is a chance to strengthen Albury‟s economy and will play a big part in the Albury community. We have to think of the next generation too. We have to progress as a city, we need to attract people here.
Please look to the future and have courage and not let political point scoring or back door 'deals' prevent this vital project from going ahead.
Please use the money from the federal government and the city and find the short fall as a mix of borrowing as well as postponing projects (and then seek other funding for those!) And do the job! We will all benefit from it and the postponed projects that we have no external funding for at present can be done later - after seeking funding for them. I have heard that the nsw government does not have capital / building money available just now, so ask them later when they might. But to give the 'free' three and a half million back is not acceptable. Build the new gallery now or it will cost more later.
Plenty of roads around the city need repair, not just "band aid" patches, where is the money for this?
Pressure should be kept on the state government. We are at the very bottom of nsw and the state government seems to forget we exist. The government‟s finances may improve and we get funding.
Priority for spend should go to health first, cultural should clearly come second. Whilst the art gallery needs to be done and fully support it - additional funding from council should be looked at from a macro view - would this 3.5 m be better spent on one of the many health services like the hospitals that so desperately need upgrading (and are also waiting on lack of fed / state funding)
Promote the election of a local independent state representative. That will fix the funding issues.
Put money into tourism for kids mostly teenagers and free sport venues e.g. Basketball and tennis courts open to public at parks around town (the well used basketball court at the old uni now closed where to go now)
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 45 February 2013
Other Comments
Question 3 should ask "do you visit the art gallery"? Never-not a bit interested. More interested in roads and other important and necessary expenditures, not for the few that feel they are "elite" and entitled to be subsidised by the ratepayers.
Question 4 my visitation would improve as the facility would be able to hold bigger exhibitions and events
Question number 4 is certainly a loaded question, par excellence. Why must every question have a 'mark'?
Rate payers cannot pay any more in rates we pay to use sporting facilities, the art gallery should charge
Ratepayer‟s money could be much better spent on projects that actually aid rate payers - e.g. An annual kerbside rubbish collection.
Ratepayers are burdened with increasing charges and levies. Most are facing huge increases in electricity, gas and water. The council must accept the need to seek government funding for the additional $3,500,000 needed. Ratepayer should not have to cover this extra cost.
Ratepayers cannot afford this luxury. Let those who want it pay for it
Ratepayers cannot pay more. The art gallery, while an asset to Albury is not used by a majority of the population, and rates therefore, would be better to be cut, or used in something that more ratepayers have use for.
Ratepayers‟ money should be used for more important purposes that benefit all ratepayers...repeat all...not a minority.
Rates a high enough, possibly the highest in the state for the minimal service and poor roads. This town needs to get behind small business to increase the attraction to the area, not a gallery. Use the river like other towns do on the Murray.
Redesign so it doesn't cost so much, then council could afford it or build part now and add other buildings later.
Redevelopment would be great but not at further expense to the rate payer.
Redevelopment would give the Albury regional art gallery the opportunity to host innovative, contemporary and challenging exhibitions and should be considered a major asset to the city and its people.
Regardless of where the funding comes from, it will be yet another drawcard for visitors to the region. The multiplier effect is huge for the local economy. There are far more economic benefits to this project than what there are negatives (i.e. Original cost). Regional art galleries and museums are a window of a community culture, values, expression and development. Art galleries give us a chance to be reflective, challenged and exposed to new ideas providing a forum for us to meet and learn. I have had the privilege of travelling widely and i visit galleries for these very reasons; opportunities to see a snapshot of a community, its past, present and values in what i see as a very transparent expression.
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 46 February 2013
Other Comments
Regional infrastructure should not have to be funded by rate paying residents in order to have up to date arts facilities in the area. The art gallery is important to continue to move Albury forward from a cultural point of view.
Shame council didn't get their funding application in on time...maybe we wouldn't be in this position!
Share resources (funding, staff, talent, knowledge) with Wodonga council
Simply that the proposed redevelopment would contribute significantly to tourism in the region
Society is measured by its cultural achievements. Albury has ambitions for significant long term growth and a cultural centre of national/international standing is essential infrastructure development. A significant gallery places Albury on the map as a significant point of destination.
Some of the government money spent on useless Sydney projects would be better spent in regional nsw.
Spend the money down at noriel park, where tourists can enjoy the river. Stop trying to compete with the big cities.
Spend the money on other things cumberoona uiver.
Spend the money on roads you have got to have roads to go and see places anyway so build proper roads first
St Matthew‟s Anglican church is interested in working with the council to be able to 'share' the facility, and to ensure we remain part of the 'big picture' to the benefit of all - including access and good facilities.
Still don't know if my job at Albury city is secure or not.
Stop increasing borrowing commitments
Stop spending ratepayer‟s money on projects that only a minority uses. Start listening to the majority. These questions are not getting to the nitty gritty of the issue.
Strenuous efforts should already be in progress to obtain funding from private and philanthropic sources as it seems any consideration from the nsw state government does not seem likely. Is it possible to approach private or philanthropic organisations to become financial partners in this project on a sound business investment basis? There would be benefits surely in establishing a body corporate involving commercial investors and local government. In view of the projected forecast of such exciting financial, cultural and business benefits to our city, is it possible that there are organisations out there in the ether that can solve this horrible short funding problem which now exists?
Strongly supporting the art gallery project says a lot about what we value and how we see ourselves as a progressive and forward looking regional centre. To turn our backs on this opportunity will would be tragic.
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 47 February 2013
Other Comments
Such a development stands to benefit Albury in both arts and culture and also in potential tourism.
Such a project would bring many extra visitors (therefore dollars) and longer stays.
Surely council can‟t pass up on the chance to get $3.5million from the federal government.
Surely there are better projects to spend $3.5 million dollars on. How many people visit the gallery on a daily basis?
That‟s a lot of money towards arts when important infrastructure that all residents benefit from would be more beneficial to pursue. Eg road maintenance, yearly roadside collection, to reduce cost of garbage tip fees
The Albury city council should stop spending our money willy-nilly just to try and keep up with Wodonga. The rates are amongst the highest in n.s.w. As it is. Should be user pays. Pensioners have a hard enough time as it is to try and keep their heads above water without Albury city council wasting rate payer‟s money and then putting rates up to cover costs. The art gallery & similar infrastructures provide balanced opportunities for all people within the community sporting venues & the likes cater for a certain type of person so do theses cultural centres it is imperative that everyone within the community is provided with venues to cater for these individual differences The art gallery building was built in the horse & buggy era. And is now becoming less competitive with the visual arts major touring exhibitions. The chimneys (for a public building) are a serious potential danger during an earth tremor. (note Christchurch NZ) access for wheeled carts is via the rear exit door. No elevator for first floor access for wheeled carts major exhibitions encourage visitors and showcase the city of Albury (note the number of overseas visitors that record their names in the visitors‟ books.) As per the library/museum an upmarket gallery would greatly enhance the city
The art gallery is in a beautiful historical building. I am not familiar with the new plans but i would hate that building to be not used by the public.
The art gallery redevelopment is an extremely important project not just for the continued development of arts and culture in Albury, but also the ambience, vibrancy and amenity of the Albury cbd. It would be an enormous shame to lose the federal funding that council officers have worked so hard to obtain, just because the state government are not willing to come to the party. The art gallery should be viewed as an important draw card to encourage tourists to the area. It is also vital in the education and development of our community and local schools. Albury Wodonga should be proud of the diverse range of local artists and talent we have and be making the most to showcase and promote it.
The art gallery will bring major exhibitors to the city which in turn will bring tourist money here. We have excellent sporting facilities and this would enhance the cultural requirements. To enable growth we need to provide good education, sporting and cultural facilities for families.
The art gallery would add culture to the area. It would also be useful for an educational resource for the younger generation. An area could also be designated for our indigenous art.
The arts are extremely important to the growth and development of the community.
'The arts' is an area that i believe could attract many tourists, Tamworth has music, why couldn't Albury be the art capital, and we already have many talented local artists.
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 48 February 2013
Other Comments
The building needs to be designed and run in an environmental/ sustainable way
The community would have to be stupid or ultra conservative to pass on this opportunity. Albury will remain a backwater if it can‟t move along with the times in terms of cultural development.
The contemporary indigenous collection belonging to Albury city was the main reason i decided that i could live in Albury- great collection well spied and curated
The council has enough debt. Debt reduction should be their policy. Continuing rate increases are a great disincentive to living or doing business in Albury
The council is spending far too much on new buildings and tearing down old ones just to keep modern. Art galleries are meant to be old that is what attracts people especially visitors in the end it will be the rate payers that will pay the bill our rates are far too high now as no service is received for the money we are charged.
The council must continue to pursue the nsw government to fund this project.
The council must reduce debt first.
The council needs to exercise care when spending in these troubled economic times and it would be good to see the council allocate money to promote the river precinct to encourage more tourists to Albury. It is such a beautiful area and so underutilised by visitors.
The council should proceed with some fiscal caution. Past experiences, cumberoona, ivor suggest it should focus on providing the services required by rate payers rather than venture into commercial enterprises that it has no obvious expertise in
The council should try to reduce existing debt before proceeding with any further structural development, not including roads etc. The loss of the federal government‟s financial support might have to be borne with view of the overall picture.
The council would be better off at this stage to concentrate on reducing council debt rather than increasing it.
The council would be lacking in financial responsibility if it proceeded with this project without nsw government support. It would be totally irresponsible to continue with this project without nsw assistance. The amount of usage does not warrant the Albury council picking up the tab The council, like all other organisations from the individual to large government, at this time of belt tightening and restraint, needs to learn to live within its means, and to prioritise those things that are most important and fund them accordingly. I'm sure there are aspects of the city that should have additional support and attention that are more urgent than enlarging the gallery. We don't need to set Albury up in competition to galleries such a Benalla, wagga or Bendigo to be significant. Fiscal restraint please.
The cultural and economic benefits of an expanded art gallery would be enormous, we have in the past 12 months travelled to both Ballarat and Bendigo to view their gallery exhibitions the interest in both facilities was tremendous.
The cultural development of Albury is an important issue. This is a demographic management issue. We provide funds for sporting facilities for the young. We need to ensure we provide cultural facilities for the middle to older aged in the community. Our art gallery (if run correctly) can provide a regional tourism boost.
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 49 February 2013
Other Comments
The current gallery is in desperate need of an update. I recently went to Bendigo to visit the Grace Kelly exhibition and was blown away by the sheer volume of people in attendance. I went through the tour with a bus load of people from Brisbane who had travelled were down for the week! People need to realise the flow on effect for the city that this project will have. I'm no way an 'artsy' type but i travelled three hours to Bendigo to see an exhibition and stayed for the weekend, went out for dinner twice, shopped and generally had a great weekend. I can see the same happening here.
The decision made by council recently is a retrograde step for our city.
The decision to go ahead with the gallery has been made , do not lose the opportunity or the federal funding
The development of the art gallery would provide opportunity for the showing of even more significant art works and in turn attract visitors locally and from outside the region.
The development of this gallery is must. It will help Albury grow as an attractive place to visit and live.
The existing gallery is fine.
The expansion of the gallery complex would enrich the Albury community and provide the opportunity for the venue to stage "blockbuster" exhibitions (as is done at the Bendigo and Ballarat art galleries and the national gallery of victoria in Melbourne), potentially bringing tens of thousands of visitors and millions of dollars into the city. The federal money is currently available because of the hung parliament. The funds are likely to disappear as pressure is brought to bear on the deficit. The opportunity for further funding will be many years away. The prospect of state funding in the future is likely to be no better than federal funding. The project cost to council will never be this low again even if further funding becomes available as project costs will rise. The development will benefit generations to come and it is appropriate to have some level of borrowing so that future generations also contribute to the cost of the project.
The flow on for tourism and therefore the local economy is significant and should be a major consideration in dealing with this matter.
The funding should be provided by those who want the project - not as a general impost on rate payers.
The gallery redevelopment will provide a huge boost to Albury on so many different levels. I understand it is a large sum of money for the council, but that's what it takes to receive such an incredibly valuable outcome.
The gallery should proceed with no further borrowings and the restaurant and glass staircase for example be scrapped until funding from the state is achieved from the state to complete the project
The glass outdoor corridor is a disaster waiting to happen. Rocks etc. will be thrown at it. Being glass it is a heating and cooling nightmare that will cost the council enormous amounts in electricity. The structure intrudes unnecessarily into qe2 square. It adds nothing to the building if its main function is a fire escape this could be done far cheaper and effectively without this vandal trap. The global and local financial problems facing Australians and Albury/Wodonga residents are too great at this time for Albury city council and more particularly the mayor to be pushing this agenda. Many locals are financially embarrassed and struggling to meet their commitments. Whichever way this project is financed the costs inevitably will be passed on to ratepayers.
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 50 February 2013
Other Comments
The idea is visionary but it requires secure financial support from all tiers of government and the pursuit of suitable alternate funding.
The importance of the arts is often underestimated. For regional Australia the arts are an important part of the community fabric in providing a more complete cultural experience. The Albury city gallery is an important part of this experience. It services a very significant local and regional population. This expansion will also attract visitors to the area and provide another reason for younger people in the community to remain in the region. It will also link with the substantial educational infrastructure we have here
The library museum design was very disappointing in that the main glass areas face west. I would hope that the art gallery redevelopment plan adheres to green principles.
The library museum is one of the first places people visit when they come to Albury - they're looking for tourist attractions, and until this building came along, Albury was known as 'the place close to other tourist attractions'. The gallery redevelopment would provide another way to generate tourism in the area, and the fact that the current building doesn't have access to the first floor for anyone with mobility issues should be a good kick start to the project. The number of visitors would increase exponentially with the planned project, and people would have the chance to view more of Albury city‟s wonderful collection.
The long-term economic and cultural benefits outweigh the short-term costs.
The majority of ratepayers consider the art gallery a total waste of their money
The many that have no car and no access to one, tell alone a trailer have had their annual kerbside collection pulled because the council "could no longer afford it". However this same council wants to borrow millions to provide a new building to house artworks and travelling displays for the *few* (based on population) who would visit it.
The money would be better spent on maintain and repairing existing infrastructure.
The money would be better spent on road, water or sewerage infrastructure
The new so called council members have lost their minds. What about getting tourism back in your head? And develop ways to get tourism back where it was in 90s e.g. Cumburoona. Dutch plane. Ettamogah sanctuary frog hollow to name but a few. Tourism dollars help all community not just a few select who use the library. Think. Think. Think
The nsw government has no money at this time for this type of funding. I think more money needs to be put into the health services in the regional areas
The nsw government is showing complete lack of understanding regarding the cultural and artistic needs of regional nsw - their lack of vision will do more damage than they can appreciate. Public buildings are just that: for the public. Regional population cannot always travel to big cities to benefit from the cultural endeavours of our country. Albury will be poorer without a contemporary artistic gallery building and all the basic amenities that are required today. Come on mr O‟Farrell show that you have the intelligence to have vision for the future of regional nsw
The nsw government should supply funding for major infrastructure, but not for minority groups such as arts and music. Funding should be for the majority of residents.
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 51 February 2013
Other Comments
The nsw governments not in a position to fund anything much at the moment. I think acc spends too much on window dressing destroying historic buildings and structures. When we can procure funding will be time enough to develop the art gallery. Perhaps a less ambitious project could be considered how many visit the art gallery anyway?
The nsw state government should match the federal and local governments contribution of $3.5 million.
The number of visitors to the art gallery is very much supported by non-paying guests such as school children that have no interest in going. I think council monies should go to things that are supported by the majorities not the minorities
The number of visitors to the gallery should indicate that it is not on anyone‟s list of priorities
The opportunities for the city is the redevelopment went ahead are large and varied. The diversity it would bring to the city and its residences cannot be dismissed.
The people of the Albury region have nearly always supported liberal/coalition parties to form government. It's time for them to give back to make Albury a centre of excellence
The plans are very ambitious, perhaps too grand
The potential for increased visitor numbers experienced by major exhibitions such as the Grace Kelly exhibition held in Ballarat would surely justify the investment
The present gallery is far from suitable. The proposed gallery would be a cultural improvement for the city of Albury. It would be a wonderful tourist attraction.
The price of $10.5m is an estimate only and based on other past estimates e.g. Lavington library fit out will blowout and the ratepayer will pick up the shortfall. Council including the liberal party mayor need to continue to lobby nsw government. Perhaps use lobbyist‟s expert in this field instead of an acting general manager and talk to the finance minister instead of arts minister. Offer naming rights to a major donor e.g. David harper a local who has done quite well from the volt lane purchase and development. The proposed art gallery redevelopment should go ahead in order to: provide a state of the art facility to attract large exhibitions to Albury, which in turn would inject capital into Albury businesses. The current art gallery is inaccessible to the handicapped and elderly (i.e. The second floor) - one example being that at a past tafe exhibition a wheel-chair bound student had to be carried up the stairs in his chair to be a part of his own group exhibition... Which in this day and age is inexcusable. Also, the new gallery would provide huge educational benefits to local school children, local artists, Albury tafe art students and other educators. Creativity has been shown to enhance social skills, imagination and provides for a variety of experiences. It is not wholly about the funding, it is about our future and how we want Albury to be viewed (as a leading city) years down the track :) The proposed art gallery redevelopment would afford Albury a state of the art facility that would encourage larger art events/exhibitions, would greatly assist in bringing culture to the forefront of the community and education and would bring more visitors to the area. Also, the current gallery is unsuited to the disabled i.e. Wheel=chair access re front entrance and staircase etc. I was at the gallery when a disabled person was carried up the stairs to the second floor by several people whilst still in his wheel chair so that he could attend the opening of his tafe art show. Not good form!!!
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 52 February 2013
Other Comments
The proposed plan looks fine. The lack of a proper art gallery in a fine established city like Albury puts it far behind other regional centres in victoria (Benalla, , Bendigo, Geelong, etc.) and nsw (wagga, Newcastle, orange, etc.). Delaying the extension until further government money is forthcoming shows Albury council's lack of appreciation of how such amenities enriches the residents and enhances the magnetism as a significant tourist destination. Just a comment about this questionnaire: please don't use people's answer to question 2 as justification for further delay; if they answer 'very important' it does not necessarily mean that this is more important than starting immediately from our own funds; it just means that of course we would like our own state government to be more responsive to regional priorities. The questions in this poll are biased for answers that will incorrectly show support for Albury council borrowing more money that they don't have to build an overpriced art gallery. Imo, council could have looked at buying the land in young st, ex bowling club, and planned a completely new building, although i can see that council wants to tie in a central development. Your comparison with Bendigo art gallery is not a true representation of future numbers and turnover, as Bendigo is close to Melbourne and easily to access. Council will have extra running overheads once art gallery built and expanded, has no members as does Bendigo, has no wills bequeathing as does Bendigo. Imo, Albury council is committing potentially a criminal act by denying citizens' other needed works to overspend on this "elitist" venture. Audrey banfield said, "not only for the elite, but for everyone", so she is admitting their attitude. Have a fair dinkum poll/survey that will give you the true thoughts of Albury's citizens, i.e.., ask the correct questions, like "should Albury council borrow more money to build the art gallery ?", etc., etc. And acc's statement that we approved qe2 square redevelopment and art gallery is incorrect, as i wasn‟t asked about it and there was not a survey for all citizens to comment about.
The rate payers of Albury should not have to carry the burden of the funding gap.
The rate payers of Albury voted for change, so far as we have seen a little, but seriously can the city and rate payers afford this when our roads are all crumbling around the city. Give us a break do something sensible with our rates. I very strongly protest my rate money going to the art gallery to leave a legacy of a noose around our necks and a name on a building that has put us into huge debt. The ratepayers of Albury have expressed their priorities re what they feel are the important issues, needs, etc. Required for our city. Even the border mail survey showed responses to many basic questions, and the “gallery" received less than 2% of the people's choice. We need to reduce debt, not increase it, with such an expense as needed for the “gallery project". It would be nice to have all this but we cannot afford it. What we have now is good anyway and we cannot afford “indulgence". Why do you think certain new councillors were elected this year? As k. Mack said “we were given a mandate". Too much interest is paid on council loans/debt already and the rate payer is getting less and less for each dollar. Start cutting. The mayor is paranoid about the gallery extension. Her legacy? Too bad. The recent council elections should have alerted the returning councillors to the obvious fact that residents don't want to have to pay for this unnecessary project which will only benefit a minority. Most of the new councillors were elected on their comments regarding the art gallery issue. They were all for ending unnecessary spending of our money and did not support the redevelopment. Trying to raise a family in Albury is becoming harder each year with the council increasing rates and then wasting money on planning projects like the redevelopment of the art gallery and not spending money on roads and other more important community issues such as surveillance cameras. The Albury library has the room for any exhibition that comes to Albury as does the existing art gallery. I am seriously considering selling up and moving my family to Wodonga where their council listens to what its ratepayers say. It seems like the few councillors who keep pushing for this redevelopment doesn‟t know when to stop wasting money. The redevelopment is critical to the elderly and handicapped because poor access facilities. Many times i have wanted to take my father to visit exhibitions held in the gallery but felt the steps and stairs made it too dangerous to risk. There must be many in a similar situation. Wheel chair and pram access should be addressed.
The redevelopment is long overdue. I see what wonderful regional galleries like Bendigo can do and ask why we can't do the same here. The answer is that we have inadequate usable gallery space and facilities.
The redevelopment is very important for the city of Albury and the wider region. It is outrageous that the nsw state govt has withdrawn funding for this project when they are happy to spend millions on a fireworks display in Sydney.
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 53 February 2013
Other Comments
The redevelopment isn't needed. Few people visit the art gallery as it is, why would you expand something that isn't popular? I used to visit the art gallery very frequently but in the last couple of years there just haven't been any good exhibitions. I believe the money could be better spent on getting exhibitions people actually want to see in the existing art gallery or on other projects. The redevelopment of the Albury art gallery is one of the best possible investments that local, state and federal governments can make. The evidence to support return on investment that Albury city council has presented, such as other regional galleries who have been enabled to host major exhibitions that they were previously unable to do, and the income generated as a direct result of these attractions for the towns and cities who have benefitted from redeveloped arts precincts is incontrovertible.
The redevelopment of the Albury regional art gallery is vital to the city's growth, civility and credibility as one of Australia‟s most important regional centres.
The redevelopment of the art gallery has been in the pipeline for years. To not go ahead with it now would waste years of effort, resources and money that has already been spent in the planning phase. Considering this cost is just as important as the actual redevelopment costs. Do current councillors wish to waste that money already spent? Albury needs quality community infrastructure assets to stay ahead as a significant regional centre or risk falling behind and becoming a forgotten backwater. The redeveloped art gallery will bring financial benefits to the city over the long term and must go ahead. Albury spends millions on sporting infrastructure and events and ratepayers and councillors don't baulk at that. Albury needs to boost its financial commitment to cultural events as not all people play or are interested in sport. The redevelopment would also ensure that the community makes better use of qeii square. The redevelopment must go ahead even without funding from the nsw government. We cannot lose the funding from the federal government. Councillors must focus on the long term benefits this redevelopment will bring to Albury and should not take a short-sighted view. Council should unite and support a project that will benefit the whole community in a myriad of ways: enhance the cultural offering to the community, bring long term financial benefits to the whole of the city, enhance the resources to hold significant cultural assets that Albury cannot showcase given the current arrangements, place Albury on the map for potentially significant exhibitions and with this, ratepayers can stay in their own home town to view these exhibitions rather than having to travel to capital cities. The answer is simple; pursue the redevelopment now.
The redevelopment of the art gallery is possibly the most important step Albury city council could take in ensuring the cultural life of the city.
The redevelopment of the art gallery would be a wonderful addition to the already beautiful Albury cbd and is well overdue. The redevelopment of the art gallery would allow for travelling exhibitions such as the Grace Kelly exhibition which injected millions of dollars into the Bendigo city council, it could also be utilised as a training facility for young artists. I can remember the controversy surrounding the proposed library museum and what about the amazing response since it opened. Make it happen. The redevelopment of the gallery offers huge potential to attract higher quality exhibitions and visitor numbers to Albury. It also provides a balance with the many sporting venues. It's time for Albury to once and for all establish itself as the leading regional city in Australia.
The redevelopment of the gallery would make it more physically accessible to patrons. I never thought about its accessibility before i had major surgery this year & went to visit the gallery only to find i couldn‟t access the entire gallery.
The redevelopment should include space for local artists, however the works need to be critiqued and accepted first....
The redevelopment will give access to the disabled and wheelchair bound friends of the gallery. Also a boost for tourism.
The redevelopment will have a multiplier effect for tourist traffic and local employment. Essential project.
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 54 February 2013
Other Comments
The redevelopment would benefit people who are disadvantage due to not have access the upper level with the new concept for the gallery there will be opportunity for age and people with mobility problems to access the upper level of the building and be able to participate
The regional art gallery redevelopment would be wonderful if we could afford it. To put pressure on the rate payers or borrow the money on a project that is not a necessity in my opinion is wrong.
The regional gallery is a fine asset for the people of Albury. This project should be pursued now. There will never be the perfect time to raise funds!
The state government provides funds each year for such things as infrastructure, why then can't Albury city council wait until such grants are available." why the big hurry". The library will still be there next week, next year, whenever. I find the existing library most comfortable.
The state government should be held to account for its promises...
The value of a cultural facility such as an art gallery cannot be measured in dollars. It contributes to the wellbeing of a community in many ways, often indirectly, but artistic expression in its many forms is vital.
The value of the arts is generally underestimated by the current nsw state government. The pursuit of a surplus leads to this sort of decision making.
The Victorian government seems to have better attitude to regional development, i think we should secede to victoria
There are a lot of more valuable projects that the money can be spent upon without catering for minority interests
There are currently more important things that money needs to be spent on other than an art gallery that is appealing to a very small demographic of the community. The councillors need to understand they are running a business which needs to be kept in the black, what happened to saving up for something rather than just getting expensive loans?
There are many more important areas for that kind of money, health facilities for example.
There are many other matters which acc could be applying funding to. I am not in favour of acc taking on this project - it has a terrible record of involvement with anything tourism orientated - after 30 plus years i can't see any improvement in its tourism/arts standing.
There are many other things that amount of money could be spent on.
There are many projects in Albury that need attention, particularly roads that the majority of Albury residents use daily, that need urgent upgrading. If council spend 3.5 or 7 million on the roads we would then have a good road infrastructure.
There are many state government projects to help develop and maintain population in regional areas, art is as important as any.
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 55 February 2013
Other Comments
There are more important and demanding requirements for Albury to either replace or repair that would be better utilised or patronised by the entire Albury community than a new art gallery. What is actually wrong with the current art gallery? You say this new art gallery would benefit Albury financially - where are the predicted figures? Stop wasting money on something for the minority and put the money towards the wider community projects.
There are more important areas for Albury council and their rate payers to improve before an upgraded art gallery.
There are more important areas of council needing money
There are more important issues
There are more important issues to address. Not that many people visit the gallery.
There are more important things to spend this type of money on such as fusing roads and making paths. Take a look down Oliver street in Lavington and fix the sides of the roads!
There are more pressing needs in our community than to pander to the desires of a very vocal minority
There are other major projects which should be looked at first before this i.e. Roads, infrastructure, noreuil park precinct, new or bigger aquatic centre. Look at the state of reserves and park areas, overgrown and run down. Improve the cbd area and assist businesses to stay in business, how many vacant premises are there in Albury/Lavington area? First thing you can do is move the stupid taxi rank opposite the Hume building society, what a waste.
There are other more important priorities.
There are other parts of Albury/Lavington/north Albury that need money spent for the benefit of all rate payers not just art enthusiasts
There are probably many developments needed in Albury that will benefit the majority of people in the city rather than a project that will probably be utilised by a minority.
There is much evidence that the economic benefits of a quality regional art gallery would flow onto the region within a few years. Given the slowing of the economy, i also think that the council's capital expenditure on this major project would bolster the local economy in the short term as well. There is no reason why Albury should not seek to be a regional leader in arts and culture Bendigo has done it too much acclaim and no doubt that city reaps its own benefits from that position. We have a significant distance to travel to international quality cultural events and i believe there is a opportunity for Albury to capitalise on this by providing high standard events for rural and regional nsw and vic. There is roughly 100 000 people in Albury/Wodonga, of which how many have a genuine enough interest in an art gallery to justify Albury city spending $3.5m of their money on upgrading something that most will never visit nor care about. It only benefits a very small and select group of people. Maybe a reduction in rates or more on infrastructure to beautify the city would be much more beneficial to the people of Albury, and a much more popular one. It‟s an absolute joke that the council is considering spending so much money on something that will benefit so few.
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 56 February 2013
Other Comments
There is so much to be done in, and on the outer fringes, that must be done...e.g. Roads, that surely that comes first, that is what councils are for, maintain the important assets, for the whole population, not tourists, etc.
There needs to be a youth cafe/ youth friendly environment - Albury does not need yet another restaurant - young people need a central area to host events and access facilities.
There should be considerable pressure on the state govt and local member to fund this project. The economic return in terms of employment and its flow-on in the immediate future and the benefit of having major exhibitions regionally would be a very cheap investment by the state government. Unfortunately, we're in a very safe liberal seat - surely there can be a whole lot more pressure put on the current state govt.
Think the redevelopment should proceed regardless of whether the state government commits its share of funding. But they should continue to be pursued and other funding options including area prioritising of council's funding.
Think this added expenditure on the art gallery is unwarranted and unnecessary-there is adequate space now and if necessary art exhibitions could be rotated
This city cannot afford this vast expenditure when funds are short and there are more things need the money more urgently than the art centre!
This development affords our entire region (not just Albury) a fantastic opportunity to draw more day and overnight visitors. The redeveloped art gallery would be able to hold first class exhibitions over a period of months not just days or weeks. Albury city should absolutely make this development happen.
This development is important for reasons of tourism, mental health and wellbeing in the community.
This development is very important for Albury
This development is very important for Albury and should go ahead no matter who funds it as it will benefit Albury culturally and financially (via tourism). Other regional centres such as Bendigo and Ballarat attract big crowds- even many from Albury.
This development will be an asset of great cultural, architectural and economic value to Albury. It would be very foolish and short sighted to miss this opportunity.
This is a development of significant importance to the region. Albury is a major destination for commuters, shoppers and day-trippers. I believe the hold that has been placed on this development is inappropriate and must be addressed asap.
This is a great opportunity for Albury. If this doesn‟t go ahead then we will have missed a great investment in our future
This is a huge cost for a minority group (people who visit art galleries are in the minority). The money could be better spent, such as reducing rates for rate payers.
This is a long term project which will benefit many generations to come
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 57 February 2013
Other Comments
This is a major piece of infrastructure that will add to the cultural precinct of Albury and make Albury a cultural destination for exhibitions and tourists in the long term. The opportunity must not be lost or watered down.
This is a one-off opportunity to take advantage of the funding already promised and all the planning done. It is shameful that the present gallery has no access to the second floor for the elderly and disabled and renovations are well overdue.
This is a total waste of rate payer‟s money. Spend it on things we, the locals, really want or need upgraded. E.g. Roads, parks for our children to enjoy, sporting facilities. Stop charging ridiculous fees to go to the tip etc. Not those who don't live here.
This is a valuable and worthwhile project to Albury and it is imperative that it goes ahead now while there is federal funding available
This is a very much an overkill for Albury the major part of council priorities should be on roads drainage and keeping this city clean
This is a wonderful idea. I have no issue with the council taking on more debt to fund this. The debates about debt are bizarre considering the small amount in question, the low overall debt levels of the council, and the fact that those complaining more than likely have mortgages substantially larger than their yearly incomes.
This is an idea whose time has not yet come!
This is major project with a lot of federal funds available. It would be Albury's loss if we do not take advantage of this gift.
This is not an economic boom time so keep council focussed on core issues such as parks, garbage, roads etc. It would be interesting to compare residents of Albury with the actual number who attend the art gallery i.e. Not the repeat visits just the number who use it and if so is it a minority fads for a select few or will it be more widely used. This is such an important development for Albury & the surrounding region. Art is not the elitist, middle-class interest it has sometime been portrayed to be. Rather, the immense success of new institutions such as goma in Brisbane & Mona in Hobart shows that there is a huge interest in well-designed & highly interactive cultural spaces, from within local communities as well as tourism-based visitors. This proposed art gallery re-development is sure to further enhance the vibrancy that the new library museum brought to town, and will complete the vision of the amazing city square we've been hearing about for years now. Please don't miss the opportunity the federal funding has given us, we need an art gallery that is fully accessible to everyone, not just those able to walk up stairs.
This is the only opportunity Albury will get to build a much needed upgraded facility
This is the right time to invest in our infrastructure. It will build on our tourism profile.
This is totally unnecessary at this point in time. Too much debt for the benefit of too few ratepayers.
This is vital for the qeii precinct to be complete and successful.
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 58 February 2013
Other Comments
This issue became very political before the election. Why now are we being asked for help or advice? The mayor said it was going to happen.
This kind of frivolous spending a down-turning stagnant economy is highly inappropriate. There are many other poorly funded projects in Albury that deserve funding rather than this high brow unnecessary project.
This money could be sent on facilities that will bring more tourism to Albury
This project has already been promised to the people of Albury and has already been through community consultative process in previous forums. This valuable economic and cultural project is for community betterment and needs to proceed.
This project is ego driven by councillors - what about your rate payers??? There are many other projects that would benefit your rate payers much more. What exchange do you get when you look at an image in an art gallery = 5mins of "hum that's ugly, i hate that". If people want art, view art, be inspired by art then use instagram!
This project is more deserving of funds than the cumberoona which never seems to realise its potential.
This project is not as important as other more pressing concerns in our community. E.g.: sporting facilities, safe bike paths, play grounds for kids, which would be used by many more ratepayers and visitors (Albury does not have a year-round public swimming pool. Many more people use the pool than visit the art gallery) Albury has a perfectly functional art gallery and does not need a new one. In my opinion, this project involves spending a huge amount of money which will not benefit the wider community and is unnecessary.
This re-development can only improve facilities for the whole region, north and south of the border. The success of the Albury library museum and the cube Wodonga developments are proof of the benefits of such development.
This redevelopment is long overdue. The present galleries are too small for significant exhibitions, which could attract many more visitors also from a larger surrounding area and their cities. I do hope this project does not land in the too-hard basket. This redevelopment is vital for the general community with regards to cultural experiences, our ability to encourage visitors and tourists (and their money) to the region and for education and leisure opportunities for local schools and community groups. I find it very worrying that this has even become an issue when the relevance and importance of the art gallery redevelopment is so self-evident. This re-development plan has been studied and discussed since 1993, community consultations have occurred over the years - the details would be in the records of the art gallery and council. The cultural precinct was an important part of the 2030 forward looking planning exercise. My curiosity is aroused because the 5 votes against the proposal suggest that these citizens were not very aware of what was a growing expectation of Albury city to keep our growing regional centre on par nationally with its cultural institutions. If we want our 'home' to grow it has to have first class cultural institutions.
This redevelopment should go ahead. It would bring visitors to Albury city and greatly enhance what is already a wonderful gallery.
This redevelopment would be such a positive move for Albury, this site would become 'something to see', and i would definitely tell visitors about it or even take them there; whereas now i don't mention the art museum to friends that are visiting.
This redevelopment would provide a wonderful tourist destination, a cultural hub thus enhancing the arts in our community and an even more wonderful space to attract exhibitions and functions. We don't want Albury to be a cultural backwater.
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 59 February 2013
Other Comments
This region has a high level of visual arts activity. The redevelopment of the gallery would take advantage of this and foster even more activity, and higher quality work.
This should be commenced as soon as possible otherwise what funding is available from the commonwealth government may be lost
This survey seems to miss the point. Council need to take advantage of the federal government contribution as we do need to redevelop the art gallery and it doesn't have anything to do with how often i would it‟s all about attracting new visitors to the gallery and Albury. There is no return in just looking after the locals we need to make it an attraction that draws others to the area. Please don't let this opportunity pass like other before it. This is important This type of development would only serve a small portion of the Albury community. There are bigger and better art galleries in larger cities thus no reason to come to a small town money better spent on the Murray river project for tourism
This will be a huge advantage to help attract "block buster" events, & therefore increase tourism. Just look what they have done in Bendigo.
This will make a huge impact on tourism. Albury will be put on the map and injections of new and valuable interest in a region that is incredibly vibrant and well loved. The potential is enormous for our community.
This would be a waste of money when other things need more attention
This would be amazing for the city of Albury/Wodonga and surrounds.
To be honest, i rarely visit now - probably because the current space is so small it does seem a 'waste of time' to go. Should the redevelopment go ahead, council can attract more and varied exhibitions, which would definitely make me go more often. I never attended the library/museum until the redevelopment and now i go at least once a fortnight or month with my daughter. If the regional art gallery is redeveloped at the standard of the library/museum, then it will be a wonderful attraction for locals and tourists alike. I wish you all the best in your funding endeavours. To ensure Albury is even remotely attractive as a city to visit, invest or live in the future it must have high quality cultural facilities like an art gallery with everything that it will hold, art, creativity, difference, identity and action. Without that why be here! To obtain $3.5million from government, council now has to spend $7million, for something few locals will actually use or see. Council will not spend on other community projects like the water wheel in Wodonga place; the cumberoona is being reluctantly repaired and still hidden from ratepayer‟s eyes. The dc2 aircraft, Australia‟s oldest, used as the uiver over the years has been pushed aside and forgotten. Each of the above was community project by the people of Albury for the people of Albury which council have badly neglected, now you want to spend money you did not have for those projects when help was asked for. Grow up, fix up your easier neglected accepted community projects, you have insulted many already by inaction before spending on the cliquey must have art museum
Too expensive with current debt levels
Too much for too few.
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 60 February 2013
Other Comments
Total waste of rate payers and state money just leave as is.
Trends and fads come and go, however the legacy of art and culture is vital for a country to promote and express itself. It is impossible to put a value on it.
Ultimately it comes down to priorities. I like the proposal but can't say how it sits relative to other things competing for funds not sure if really needs a restaurant - plenty of cafes nearby. Kitchen for functions is a good idea though more gallery space will only be useful if more exhibitions can be afforded anyway.
Unless the redevelopment can be funded equally by all govt's it should not proceed.
Unless the state government kick in their share of what is a regional facility then this project should not go ahead. Albury residents should not have to pay yet another $2.5m on top of the $2.5m for a regional facility that all our neighbours can and will use for nothing. We will be paying for this for at least ten years in our rates. It is about time our neighbours starting paying their fair share and the only way i can see that happening is for the state government to pay their 1/3 of the costs.
Use any council surplus money to fulfil the promises made to ratepayers.eg Thurgoona community centre
Use some of the money to bring back the annual council clean up, where once a year council collects rubbish from ratepayers. Not everyone has access to trailers etc. to go to the tip. Also this may stop the dumping of unwanted rubbish at charity stores.
Waste of money is fine as it is
Waste of money on a project that only attracts a very few art followers. Money needs to go towards roads, rubbish and drainage.
We already have an art gallery
We always benefit from these projects and as long as they do not detract from the beautiful old buildings and leafy street-scape i am sure they will always be embraced
We are $53 million in the red---we cannot afford it, more debt means more interest---we cannot afford it
We are one of the most highest rated cities in Australia i don‟t think the residents can afford any more price rate rises- in these difficult time we need to have restraint
We are supposed to have a major regional gallery here in Albury; it's time to make it look like one. The gallery redevelopment is not a gamble it is an investment.
We as a community cannot afford to go into debt at a time when we struggle to make ends meet in our businesses and households. Great services are one thing, but cost has to be considered. Thank-you for the openness in allowing ratepayers to contribute to the discussion.
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 61 February 2013
Other Comments
We cannot afford it! Rates are too high as it is and our income is decreasing because of interest rate cuts. The art gallery caters to an elite minority. What's worse is that the redevelopment will affect retro which caters for some of the most disadvantaged in the city. Let the art snobs pay for their own pleasures. We do not think that the old gallery should be structurally altered. It is fine to link with the other building - but enough is enough in terms of altering our local historical architectural structures. They are beautiful old buildings and historical. More support should be given to our artists, regardless of age, who live and work in our community. It is people and their contribution to culture that is important. We need more balance in this aspect not in endless providing of bricks and mortar.
We don‟t need another/extended art gallery when we have the library museum.
We don't need an art gallery, waste of tax payer‟s money. Better off putting money towards the plane or cumberoona, or even the wild life sanctuary. Too many gallery's and library's every schools got them, tafe looks like not having art courses any more or cutting them anyway. We need tourist dollars to keep this city going, let Wodonga build an art gallery.
We feel the existing building is more than sufficient for now and the foreseeable future
We have a wonderful library museum that is sufficient spending on cultural instructor for many years to come. Lets concentrate on building a strong community in all aspects not just cultural
We have just returned from Canada and U.S.A. - they are proud of their arts - especially their wildlife artists, just looks at the national museum of wildlife in jackson hole - Albury is perfectly placed to have the same high art profile in Australia We have the best tourist attraction flowing through our city and we don't use it, we need an attraction that will bring people here 365 days a year like a tourist park on the river. People, who frequent art galleries do not spend money anything like people staying in parks, ask any town (other than Albury) along the river. Plus we are already highly rated and many of us can't afford more council debt.
We haven't the money to afford this development and returns will be negative.
We must have this new development. Cities are about lifestyle and ambience.
We need a bigger and better art gallery to match our wonderful city. Gallery is for everyone today and the future.
We need this redevelopment - the building is old and inaccessible.
We seem to be losing so much of our art opportunities in Albury-Wodonga. The gallery is the centre of all art activity hereabouts.
We should be thinking like the people of Bendigo and Benalla did. If we don't take the opportunity to extend the art gallery, by linking with the court house building now, it may be lost forever.
We should developing the arts in our city
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 62 February 2013
Other Comments
We should not have to pay higher rates to cover the cost of the development. If the council cannot afford it then the redevelopment should not go ahead.
We should wait for a better economic climate - funds should be diverted to better use
We shouldn't have to get into massive debt for this.
Well done Albury council for promoting this redevelopment and pursuing it as you have. It is vital that we promote the arts in our city and have a world class art gallery now and into the future. The nsw govt needs to provide some support for what will ultimately benefit the people of nsw and Australia. We as a regional city cannot be stymied by the short sightedness of our state govt. We may have to endure some short term financial pain for long term gain. Keep up the great work. As a newcomer to Albury i applaud this kind of development. It sets Albury aside from other areas when projects such as these are developed. What i do not understand is what i have learned in the four months since living here and that is the pathetic one upmanship that Albury engages in with Wodonga. The million dollars Albury spent on the playground was very wasteful as Wodonga had sumsion gardens that can be shared. Let's look at the twin towns from the perspective of what we can achieve together and not double up on facilities. Work together not against each other. We could have used that money on the gallery and build a distinctive feel and culture to Albury which benefits the residents on both sides of the river. It is ironic that council speaks of drawing tourists yet actions re the playground appeared very short sighted and sent quite a negative message to the people and council of Wodonga. No gallery redevelopment will bring tourists if we have a narrow focus, mean spirited approach in what we do. Visitors to the area will visit both Albury and Wodonga and as a new resident to Albury there is a lot of snobbery from Albury in relation to Wodonga. Work together and no more doubling up of facilities. The two areas are side by side yet distinctly unique. Plonking the same facilities side by side is wasteful! I for one go to Wodonga to shop most of the time and i have also landscaped my garden completely by sourcing plants in Wodonga because the snobbery associated with Albury means the mark up on prices is often 300%. Work smarter Albury council and this is one example of how you can do this. Keep up the great work and keep your focus on building a distinctive culture for the city, dispense with the 'keeping up with the jones's' approach. We will end up with a theme park rather than atmosphere and culture. Dean street has atmosphere and culture; we need to build on the central areas as this project will.
What a waste of money it would be better spent on other more important infrastructure like sewer upgrades or roads
What a waste of money!!!!
What about a user pays system
What about providing support for the sporting industry i.e. Hall of fame - Albury Wodonga festival of sport. There are over 60 frames that are being stored because Albury and Wodonga council have no option to display these achievements. Numerous times we have approached the library/museum to establish the possibility to display them as an exhibition of some kind and we get no reply back.
What is the real opportunity cost of this project?
What will happen to the retro youth cafe? I am still supportive of the development, however i think there should be something in the cbd for the local youth. What's the solution?
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 63 February 2013
Other Comments
When the council reduces rates back to the level they should be including reducing the wages cost for the council staff by at least 3% & also stop wasting money then these types of projects can be looked at.
When words fail, our souls speak through artworks.
When you visit other regional towns they have really extensive art gallery. They are able to display far more than Albury ever has
Whilst projects such as the gallery redevelopment have value beyond their face value, it is also critical, not to overload the community with crippling debt. Also, like all levels of government, Albury city is there to serve the community, not to operate as a commercial enterprise. Why are the councillors convincing themselves that anyone who supports the arts isn't a part of the whole community? I live in Glenroy. I am a part of a middle class working family. I think the art gallery is a great project for us and the whole community. Will my opinion be overlooked because i am a supporter of the arts? I support sport, i play sport, and i go to the footy. I am also an arty person. Challenge your notion of the arts community councillors. Stop making assumptions. Why even think about giving back $3.5m to the federal government! You will never get another such opportunity to have $3.5m towards a $10.5m project. Council spends money every year on developing sporting facilities; why not the art gallery.
Why forfeit $3.5mil? You can get a building for $10.5mil for $7mil - a bargain. It will complement the other developments on the qeii square and encourage those highly sought after city slickers to move to our culturally enriched community. We will never be offered $3.5mil for the art gallery in my life time; make the most of it.
Why not be less ambitious and redevelop it for a figure of 7 million dollars.
Why spend so much money on an asset that will be enjoyed by the few who enjoy art. Spend more money on sporting clubs that actually get kids off the street and teach discipline
Will a new art gallery help with a disaster or the current obesity crisis as a disaster management centre or the redevelopment of sporting facilities like the projects that are going to be delayed? Priorities
Will be an excellent addition to the cultural precinct and so increase significantly tourism to Albury, as well as being a source of education and pleasure for residents
Will there be an area within the plan of the new gallery for young children to express themselves artistically as a means of encouraging and introducing young ones to a cultural art experience
With heavy debt, this proposal is out of the question. Council needs to look after its rate payers, not continually fleece them. Restore the kerbside waste disposal. Mate street has been a disgrace for years-this is the gateway to the city from the north....all during the mayor's watch. The ripping out of beautiful trees in Urana road...is this the start of another mate street? The managers of the art gallery need to source exhibitions from a wider source. There is no parking...we have an aging population who do not wish to walk blocks.
With increases in rates and water and garbage charges i do not believe we should be going into debt to fund this project i have one question and that is what profit does the library museum make if any.
With our current high rates i don't want to have to fund the art gallery. Get the state govt to chip in or wait. There are a number of other projects in Albury that need doing.
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 64 February 2013
Other Comments
Would like to see money being spent on sporting facilities rather than the art gallery.
Would prefer the council put their energy into other community efforts e.g. Cumbaroona, noreuil park foreshore development.
Would we be asking this question if it was about sporting venues.
Yes i do hope no heritage buildings in or off dean street will be demolished in your pursuit of this new development
Yes, Bendigo has won important exhibitions such as the Grace Kelly and the white wedding exhibitions, from Melbourne and i think Brisbane. These brought in large numbers of visitors and large amounts of cash for local businesses. We need to catch up if we can and the re-development is key to this i believe.
Yes, please get the cumbaroona back to operational status. This was a community bi-centennial project the council should maintain.
Yes. I am against redevelopment of burrows house, think the amount of glass proposed is unnecessary, economically and environment irresponsible (heat/ cooling. I cannot see another cafe, particularly of this size, is necessary. As you have said it is an "old town hall" building. Move the art display to the present "performing arts centre" building and run the conferences out of the present" art gallery" "old town hall" building (and usual marques). You are proposing to spend $7 million of ratepayers‟' money on a project that carries no local significance for Albury but not $2 million (your figure which is obviously inflated) to preserve the uiver story. Meanwhile, we have roads breaking up and badly in need of attention. Get your priorities right.
You do not spend money on things like art and galleries when times are tough. If you go ahead it shows the council don't have any understanding of the everyday needs of a community
You have to realize that times are not so good for most people, try to save some money like the rest of us and when the coffers are full spent it then, and on things that will benefit the majority of people, not a select few
You need to reduce current debt level before taking on additional projects, we all have to budget to meet our living costs Albury council needs to learn to do the same.
You only have to look at Benalla, Bendigo and Ballarat to see the amazing cost benefit to a regional areas tourism, to recognise that the redevelopment is a must have for this area.
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 65 February 2013
Appendix B Online Research - Questionnaire
Online Community Survey - Albury Regional Art Gallery Redevelopment
The total cost of the Albury Regional Art Gallery redevelopment is $10.5m. To meet the $10.5m cost of the project, Council has been seeking a funding arrangement with the Federal and NSW State Governments. Council has committed $3.5m and the Federal Government has pledged a further $3.5m. Council is yet to receive State Government funding for the project.
The Federal Government funding also comes with strict timelines for project completion. Under the Federal Guidelines, the project must be completed by June 2015 or their funding will be withdrawn.
Council is now in a position where it must decide whether to commit to the project without NSW State Government funding or risk losing the $3.5m Federal Government contribution.
Q1. How supportive are you of Council proceeding with the project without funding from the NSW State Government? This will mean Council having to contribute an additional $3.5m.
Very supportive O Supportive O Somewhat supportive O Not very supportive O Not at all supportive O
Q2. How important is it for the community that Council continues to pursue other avenues of funding to ensure the Albury Regional Art Gallery redevelopment goes ahead?
Very important O Important O Somewhat important O Not very important O Not at all important O
Q3. Would the redevelopment encourage you to visit the Art Gallery more often?
I would visit more frequently O I would visit less frequently O My visitation level would remain the same O
Q4. Do you think the NSW State Government should provide funding for major infrastructure projects in regional cities, such as Albury? Yes O No O Unsure O
Q5. Are there any other comments you would like to make regarding the proposed Albury Regional Art Gallery redevelopment?
......
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 66 February 2013
The following information is used for demographic purposes only.
Q6. Have you visited the Albury Art Gallery in the last 2 years?
Yes O No O
Q7. What age group are you in?
18-29 O 30-44 O 45-59 O 60 years and older O
Q8. Gender?
Male O Female O
Q9. What is your postcode? Postcode:…………………………
Q10a. Would you like to opt-in to Council’s electronic direct mail in order to receive information on future events? Yes O No O
Q10b. (If yes), what are your contact details?
Name ……………………………………………… Email ……………………………………………….
Thank you for your time.
For more information on how to get involved in the other Community Engagement activities for the Albury Regional Art Gallery redevelopment, please visit www.Alburycitynsw.gov.au/haveasay.
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 67 February 2013
Appendix C Community Engagement Activities
Nb. Community engagement activities were conducted by AlburyCity. The details and analysis in the following section were provided to Micromex by AlburyCity
Speak Out Events
There were two Speak Out consultation sessions held as part of the QEII Twilight Markets, December 13, 2012 and January 10, 2013 from 5pm – 7.30pm.
For each occasion, 8 AlburyCity Officers from within Cultural Services, Health and Sustainability facilitated a number of activities designed to engage and extract community opinion on the art gallery project and gallery participation, and perception of the arts in general. The activities were either interactive (placing a star on your preferred opinion on an interactive board) or verbal (one on one consultation or group facilitation).
The Speak Out area was designed for informal interaction with activities for children (drawing, face painting and clay sculptures), chairs and tables for discussion, activity boards and posters.
In December, the team estimated between 180 and 200 people participated in the consultation process, with 160 signatures received as part of the petition program. The following session in January, there were slightly less participants, approximately 150, with 100 signatures received.
Facilitated Interactive Sessions
The comment that was repeated in various forms was along the lines of “Yes go for it BUT would like to know in more detail which other council programs will be postponed/curtailed to find the extra 3.5 million.”
There were a lot of “go for it" without conditions of where the extra would come from and there were a few saying that it was “not time to be splashing money around”.
Scribed comments from both the sessions:
General • If the extra $3.5 million can be found for the Art Gallery, why not the Uiver and the Cumberoona, etc. • Whatever happens, preserve the heritage of the streetscape • Must maintain Burrows House heritage façade. If that cannot be done, don‟t go ahead • Make sure the new development keeps with the brick theme on the outside of the building • Do not like the modern/unnatural look and design • Council should go ahead but not get ripped off • Would like to see a complete new building and the chimneys must go • Bendigo and Ballart have beautiful historic buildings that they make the most of it – we should too • Would support the project if the gallery showed more traditional art and had bigger international exhibitions, would not like to support the gallery for small numbers • Try to find the extra funding without compromising on important services and features of the design • Go for it but not if any cricket nets are sacrificed • Need better accessibility in the gallery, disabled access throughout the building and in the front of the building not the back • Need to consider manoeuvrability in disabled toilets • Need to have all forms of art represented in the gallery, not just canvas and sculpture. Would like to see international connects with Sister City and other galleries • Would like to see artworks by children, more children‟s workshop areas and activities • Depends on what projects the money comes from e.g. Lavington Oval. But otherwise it would be great to see • As long as rates don‟t go up, I‟d be happy for Council to go ahead • As a non-Albury resident and ratepayer, I think the redevelopment is an important project but would not want to make decision for the citizens • Just do it as long as no health or youth services are compromised • Would like to know what other projects would be postponed to make this project happen
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 68 February 2013
Facilitated Interactive Sessions
Supportive
• Go ahead so we can have more youth projects for the city • Do what we can to go ahead • Window of opportunity is closing so take the chance and push the tourism, money pitch • Don‟t waste the federal funding, just do it • Put money where is community – centres and include more free family friendly experiences • Love the Art Gallery and the LibraryMuseum, anything that offers things for children • Made to feel welcome at the gallery • Just do it • Art important to show what sort of town we are. Can understand those that think it will cost a lot of money now but think of the future and what it will mean to the city in the long run • Albury needs to rejuvenate the arts • Great that Council is consulting
Objection
• Not in current climate, unless could see exactly which other projects would be postponed/ deferred. If could, then would consider • Think money could be better spent • Not the time to be splashing money about
Parked comments (part of wider cultural discussion)
• Council needs to advertise better (visually) the impacts of QEII Square e.g. in the Saturday Border Mail outside the Internet • More signs on the highway (directing people to the Art Gallery)
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 69 February 2013
Facilitated Interactive Sessions
The following table outlines the Build a Brick Barrier activity that invited participants to add a Lego brick or place a dot in squares that best describes barriers to visiting an art gallery.
Although essentially outside the scope of the art gallery redevelopment, the activity was compared to a similar Speak Out undertaken by the Cultural Services team in March 2012 and has been an important self check tool by the team in customer service relations and programming.
Highlighted in yellow and an ongoing barrier to engaging audiences is the perception that people don‟t know what is going on. Over the past 12 months, Cultural Services and Media and Communications have been developing a number of alternative marketing activities as a means of addressing this feedback.
March 2012 (base December January measure) 2012 2013 Total Population 50 % 50 % 40 % Don‟t know what‟s on 20 40% 13 26% 16 40% Haven‟t got the time to go 3 6% 8 16% 6 15% Too hard to get too/ live to far away 6 12% 0 0 Not finding parking close by 6 12% 1 2% 3 7.5% No one to go with me 5 10% 5 10% 3 7.5% Boring 1 2% 1 2% 2 5% Not sure where to go and what to do when I get 6 12% 2 4% 2 5% there Irrelevant to my life 5 10% 0 0 1 2.5% Not knowing what people are talking about 2 4% 2 4% 1 2.5% Cannot afford tickets 4 8% 0 0 0 0 Not good value for money 2 4% 0 0 0 0 Times don‟t suit 3 6% 3 6% 0 0 Elitist 2 4% 1 2% 0 0 Not having the right cloths to wear 2 4% 0 0 0 0 Don‟t understand it 4 8% 0 0 0 0 Makes me uncomfortable 3 6% 1 2% 0 0 Other: Mean people, Keep forgetting 5 10% 0 0 0 0 Too difficult with kids 0 0 1 2% 0 0
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 70 February 2013
Facilitated Interactive Sessions
Another interactive activity was the „What you like most when visiting an Art Gallery?‟ where participants were asked to place a coloured dot that represented their age group into a square that best represented their opinion.
The top 3 most popular and consistent responses were:
1. The Experience of seeing something new (No 1 in both December and January and the most popular amongst all age brackets) 2. Learning something different 3. The collection and famous paintings
The following top four responses were:
1. Browsing through the gallery shop 2. Contemporary art and sculpture 3. Going with Friends and Family 4. Public programs like drawing and painting classes
December 2012 Population 100 under 55 24 25-34 35-44 45-54 plus Total The Experience of seeing something new 7 7 5 9 8 36 Learning something different 5 7 5 7 3 27 The collection and famous paintings 5 3 5 6 6 25 Browsing through the gallery shop 4 5 5 5 5 24 Contemporary art and sculpture 6 2 4 6 6 24 Reading about the art and how it was made 1 4 7 5 3 20 Artist and Curator talks 3 4 1 7 3 18 Relaxing in a calm environment 2 6 1 6 2 17 Talking about the exhibitions with others 2 4 3 5 1 15 Multimedia and new technology 4 3 2 3 2 14 Public programs like drawing and painting classes 2 3 3 5 1 14 Going with Friends and Family 5 2 2 2 1 12 Seeing my favourite artworks 4 1 2 2 3 12 The restaurant and cafe 1 2 0 4 3 10 Watching other people 2 2 1 2 1 8 Meeting new people 0 1 2 3 2 8 Too see art 0 1 1 1 1 4 Interactive family activities 2 1 0 1 0 4 Career options 0 0 0 1 0 1 Total 55 58 49 80 51 293
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 71 February 2013
Facilitated Interactive Sessions
January 2013 Population 60 under 24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55 plus Total The Experience of seeing something new 16 7 8 8 3 42 The collection and famous paintings 12 5 6 4 6 33 Going with Friends and Family 13 2 1 7 5 28 Public programs like drawing and painting classes 15 3 4 2 4 28 Learning something different 11 3 4 4 2 24 Relaxing in a calm environment 10 2 4 2 5 23 Reading about the art and how it was made. 9 5 1 1 5 21 The restaurant and cafe 9 2 2 2 5 20 Contemporary art and sculpture 5 2 6 2 4 19 Multimedia and new technology 7 4 4 1 2 18 Seeing my favourite artworks 12 1 3 0 2 18 Browsing through the gallery shop 5 2 2 3 3 15 Artist and Curator talks 6 0 2 2 2 12 Watching other people 4 1 1 1 3 10 Meeting new people 6 1 1 0 2 10 Talking about the exhibitions with others 4 1 1 1 2 9 Total 144 41 50 40 55 330
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 72 February 2013
Correspondence (letters and emails)
There were 75 submissions received, of which 49 were supportive of the project and of Council funding the shortfall, whilst 22 objected to the project proceeding. In addition, four (4) people presented two submissions.
The main reasons for supporting the project have been:
• The project supports artists and growth in the cultural economy 14 • Community benefit 14 • Cultural tourism and raising Albury‟s profile as a regional centre 10 • The building is past its usable service 5 • Education 5 • Collection management 1 Total 49
Of the 22 that are in objection, the main reasons are:
• Shortfall should be funded outside Council 6 • Other capital priorities 6 • Reduce debt as a priority 7 • Rates going up to finance the project 3 Total 22
There have been four (4) neutral submissions, in that the writers have congratulated council on raising the debate, requested further investigation be undertaken to ensure the right decision is made and offered suggestions on improving operations.
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 73 February 2013
Correspondence (letters and emails)
The table below outlines in brief the main issue identified as objection or support of the redevelopment project, the writer and the date submitted to Council.
Date General No From Main Issue received Stance 1 Stan Walter 27/1/2013 Objection Reduce debt as a priority. 2 Ian Walter 26/1/2013 Objection Council making additional funding 3 Ray Wiliams 22/1/2013 Objection Reduce debt as a priority. Rod and Marnie 19/1/2013 Objection 4 Council making additional funding Woodham 17/1/2013 Objection Council making additional funding and Mary and Barry 5 investment into other priorities outside the CBD Callaway and other recreational infrastructure. 15/1/2013 Neutral In support of the project but would like further 6 Celia and John Saw investigation and debate on options and strategies. 12/1/2013 Support Benefits for arts education, students, artists and 7 Paula Watson community. 16/12/2012 Neutral Set up a Board of Management separate from 8 Dorothy Smith Council and recruit wider community support. 9 Nicola Hanzic 12/12/2012 Objection Council making additional funding 11/12/2012 Objection If the shortfall is not funded by the NSW 10 John Whatley Government, not go ahead. 11 Jeanette Fealy 11/12/2012 Support Cultural Tourism and Economic Growth 12 Bri Pfeiffer 10/12/2012 Support Benefit to the community 13 Ann Brennan (1) 1/12/2012 Support Benefit to the community 14 Lance White (1) 19/12/2012 Objection Reduce debt as a priority. 14/12/2012 Objection Council making additional funding and 15 Malcolm Blair investment into other priorities outside the CBD and other recreational infrastructure. Bryan and June 14/12/2012 Objection 16 Rates going up to pay for the project. Liersch Michael 13/12/2012 Support 17 Position Albury as a major regional centre. OCallaghan 19/12/2012 Support Cultural Tourism, Economic Growth and 18 Nathan Esler Community. 19 Nancy Robinson (1) 13/12/2012 Support Position Albury as a major regional centre. 20 Brett Hartley 18/12/2012 Objection Develop the Lavington Sports Ground as a priority. 21 Allison Higgins 19/12/2012 Support Position Albury as a major regional centre. 22 Lance White (2) 26/12/2012 Objection Reduce debt, invest more in roads. 20/12/2012 Support Cultural Tourism, Economic Growth and 23 Ian Sutherland Community.
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 74 February 2013
Correspondence (letters and emails)
24 Oliver Jurd 31/12/2012 Objection Council making additional funding 25 Rita Lazauskas 25/11/2012 Support Building past usable service. 26 Mary-Jane Griggs 25/11/2012 Support Cultural education and community benefit. 27 Tom Middlemost 25/11/2012 Support Collection management 28 Alex Bowen 25/11/2012 Support Community benefit 29 Susi Muddiman 25/11/2012 Support Community benefit 26/11/2012 Support Community identity and growth in cultural 30 Elise Armitage economy. 31 Stephanie Jakovac 27/11/2012 Support Community and cultural benefit 4/12/2012 Support Additional Council funds to support the project. 32 Marlene Horn Community benefit. 29/11/2012 Support Additional Council funds to support the project. 33 Neisha Webster Community benefit. 29/11/2012 Support Additional Council funds to support the project. 34 Karla Horn Community benefit. 25/11/2012 Support Community identity and growth in cultural 35 Kath White economy. Graeme Richardson 18/12/2012 Objection 36 Council Process, funding shortfall (1) 37 Treahna Hamm 29/11/2012 Support Education and Arts advocacy 2/12/2012 Support Arts Education, Community identity and growth in 38 Mary – Jane Griggs cultural economy. 39 Jeff McCann 27/11/2012 Support Growth in cultural economy. 40 Richard Jansen 28/11/2012 Support Artists and cultural economy. 41 Jenny Davies 28/11/2012 Support Education and community benefit. 42 Vicki Luke 28/11/2012 Support Artists and cultural economy. 43 Catherine O‟Donnell 28/11/2012 Support Artists and cultural economy. 44 Zoe Mason 30/11/2012 Support Artists and cultural economy. 45 Hannah Mitchell 30/11/2012 Support Education and community benefit. 25/11/2012 Support Add to the Albury economy, cultural precinct and 46 Alla McCarron community benefit. 30/11/2012 Support Artists and cultural economy. Additional Council 47 Vernon Bartlett funds to support the project 5/12/2012 Support Artists and cultural economy. Additional Council 48 Adam Kronenberg funds to support the project 49 Susan Sevil 3/12/2012 Support Building past usable service. 15/11/2012 Neutral Support Council in making a decision about the 50 Noel Jacking project. 51 Janet Drummond 22/11/2012 Support Artists and cultural economy. 52 Andrew Pearce 1/12/2012 Support Artists and cultural economy. 29/1/2013 Objection Not to fund a gallery redevelopment and fund a 53 David Cant new pool.
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 75 February 2013
Correspondence (letters and emails)
54 Wendy Baily 29/1/2013 Objection Reduce debt as a priority. 14/1/2013 Neutral Feedback and comment on the new gallery 55 Ann Brennan (2) design. 10/1/2013 Support Support for the project and offered comment on 56 Ian Bishop heritage design and other design elements. 57 Ordette Mannering 17/12/2012 Objection Rates going up to pay for the project. 58 Ken Raff 13/12/2012 Support Artists and cultural economy. 13/12/2012 Support Community identity and growth in cultural 59 Nancy Robinson (2) economy. 60 Chris Keenan 11/12/2012 Support Building past usable service. 8/12/2012 Support Building past usable service. Community identity 61 Lisabeth Souness and growth in cultural economy. 7/12/2012 Support Community identity and growth in cultural 62 Jessica Sevill economy. 63 Narelle McMillan 7/12/2012 Objection Rates going up to pay for the project. 6/12/2012 Objection Hard waste collection and roads as preference. 64 P&L Curry Other capital priorities. 65 Tracy Hancock 12/12/2012 Support Community benefit 66 Rob Scott 10/12/2012 Support Community benefit 9/12/2012 Support City‟s growth and arts and cultural tourism 67 Robyne Young potential. 68 Arthur Castley 8/12/2012 Support Community benefit 69 Kym Connell 7/12/2012 Support Project has vision. Community benefit. 7/12/2012 Support City‟s growth and arts and cultural tourism 70 Vanessa Keenan potential. Jacquilyn 71 30/1/2013 Support Cultural Industries Felmingham 72 Brian Linehan 30/1/2013 Objection Other capital priorities 73 Tonia Timmermans 31/1/2013 Objection Reduce debt as a priority. Support Art Gallery redevelopment but request 74 St Matthews 31/1/2013 Support information on land opposite redevelopment Graeme Richardson 75 31/1/2013 Objection Reduce debt as a priority. (2)
Petition to the NSW Parliament
AlburyCity has in possession 2,920 signatures as at 31/12/2012.
There was less opportunity to pursue the petition program as it was initiated just when school ended for 2012 and there was the Christmas and News Year break. Over the coming months, the team will represent the petition to:
1. Regional schools 2. Regional galleries, museums and as part of theatre events 3. Shopping plazas and in front of the Albury Art Gallery as a rostered volunteer project 4. Business and wider audiences outside Albury
AlburyCity Art Gallery Redevelopment Research P a g e | 76 February 2013
ATTACHMENT 5 – 9A
Petition to NSW State Government (Template) AlburyCity, 2012
ATTACHMENT TO CM 9B – 02/2013
HARD WASTE COLLECTION SERVICE REVIEW
ATTACHMENT 1 – 9B
EWC Report - Annual Hard Waste Collection - Monday 8 March 2010
AlburyCity – Engineering & Works Committee AGENDA
EWC 6 – REPORTS FOR DISCUSSION
6A Annual Hard Waste Collection (50/90/0001)
DATE 1 March 2010
CONFIDENTIAL YES NO If yes please tick one of the following reasons Personnel Matters Commercial Legal Security Personal Hardship
ITEM FOR DECISION ITEM FOR NOTING Meeting Date Monday 8 March 2010 Meeting Date
FURTHER ENQUIRIES TO Andrea Colston PHONE 6023 8237 Engineering
Background
The annual hard waste collection was completed in August 2009 for the current financial year. Upon completion of the collection, a review was undertaken to assess the effectiveness of the service and the future direction of the collection.
The hard waste collection is an annual collection for the residents of the Albury community and involves residents placing all household waste on the nature strip between the period from July to October. Council employees and contractors clear the waste and transport the waste generated to the Albury Waste Management Centre (AWMC).
This report will highlight the significant costs to operate a hard waste service, explore the need for a hard waste collection and consider other options available.
Legislation
NSW has set State Waste Avoidance and Resource Recovery targets, which aim to increase the recovery and use of secondary materials in the major waste streams by 2014.
These waste recovery targets are:
Municipal Waste from a baseline 26% to 66%; Commercial & Industrial Waste from a baseline 28% to 63%; and Construction & Demolition Waste from a baseline 65% to 76%.
21% of total municipal waste delivered to the Albury Waste Management Centre (AWMC) is recovered for recycling and reuse.
For NSW Waste Avoidance and Resource Recovery targets to be achieved, total waste deposited in landfill would need to be reduced to 100,000 tonnes per annum, diverting current deposits by approximately 50%.
Engineering & Works Committee – Monday 8 March 2010 21 AlburyCity – Engineering & Works Committee AGENDA
In order to work towards achieving this target and recommendations as set out in the Regional Waste Minimisation Strategy, identifying alternatives to a hard waste collection should be considered.
Financials
The following table outlines the specific volumes, by product, as received and cost of the hard waste service over the past four years.
Item 2006 2007 2008 2009 Scrap Steel 173 tonne 145 tonne 18 tonne Not separated Green Waste 423 tonne 293 tonne 222 tonne 201 tonne General Waste 691 tonne 653 tonne 723 tonne 446 tonne Totals 1287 tonne 1091 tonne 963 tonne 647 tonne Cost of Service $240,863 $227,330 $215,396 $260,659 Cost/tonne $187.15 $208.37 $223.67 $402.87
Adopted 2009 Operational Changes
The collection in previous years typically operated for 13 weeks. This collection was reduced to seven weeks in 2009 by servicing a larger residential area each week and employing additional contractors. The green waste component was primarily managed by external contractors with internal resource assistance when required.
The collection of scrap metal as a separate item was eliminated this year due to competing with local industry for the product, and the low volume obtained in previous collections. Residents are able to transport and dispose of their scrap metal to local merchants and receive a direct rebate.
The collection focused on collecting green waste and general waste only, with specific guidelines provided to the resident for compliance. The compliance department and external contractors worked closely in assisting with the enforcement issues that arose from the collection.
Negative Impacts of a Hard Waste Collection
The limitations of a hard waste collection are as follows:
significant negative aesthetic impact on streetscape; unauthorised additions to household items by other households; potential public liability issues related to OHS and traffic hazards; greater incidence of non-compliance with disposal of permitted and non-permitted items; disruption caused by scavenging; non-compliance with volumetric and weight restrictions; operational challenges due to concentrated peak workloads for contractors and Councils; and costly yearly advertising and print campaign.
Engineering & Works Committee – Monday 8 March 2010 22 AlburyCity – Engineering & Works Committee AGENDA
Many complaints are received during the service. Primarily complaints focus on lack of notice, receiving no notice, restrictions, missed collections, illegal dumping, scavenging occurring and the unsightly impact of waste throughout the community during the term of the collection.
Trucks and vans, second hand dealers and residents cruise the neighbourhood during the collection to pick out ‘goods’ before the Council contractor comes to take it all away. This often results in waste being scattered across the nature strip and separate waste streams mixed. Additionally, waste stored in public areas looks unsightly and exposes Council to public liability issues.
During the collection it was found that illegal dumping of waste occurs more frequently, primarily due to the restrictions on the materials collected. Internal and external resources were utilised for clearing of dumped waste.
From a hard waste perspective, resource recovery or separation of waste deposited at the landfill during the collection period is nil. Large volumes of mixed waste received at the landfill over a short period of time does not facilitate or promote resource recovery.
Free Entry Voucher System
Two free entry vouchers were introduced on 1 July 2009, substituting the previous free entry days at the AWMC. These vouchers were distributed with the rates notices. The feedback received has been positive. The presentation rate as of 31 January 2010 was 15% (6,476 vouchers presented).
The positive aspects of this service are:
waste is transported to the landfill at the resident’s convenience and cost; increase in volume of resource recovery; each residential household has been provided with two free vouchers to dispose of waste at any time during the financial year; and allows for no disturbance in operational activities.
Existing Waste Services
The following highlights the waste services, as provided for by the Domestic Waste Charge, which are currently available for each residential property within Albury:
140 litre weekly kerbside waste service; 240 litre fortnightly recycling service; optional 240 litre fortnightly green waste service; chemical collection; Drum Muster collection; two free entry vouchers to the AWMC, which consist of two 6 x 4 trailer loads; and an annual hard waste collection.
Engineering & Works Committee – Monday 8 March 2010 23 AlburyCity – Engineering & Works Committee AGENDA
The Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water (DECCW) recommends that our focus should be on the strategy, which highlights a reduction of 100,000 tonnes, resource recovery and tackling consumption by our community.
Taking into consideration that Council is collecting a levy of $2.50 per tonne over the next two years to implement a waste awareness and reduction program, the hard waste collection is not consistent with sustainability initiatives.
Waste Minimisation Public Awareness Campaign
The Waste Minimisation Public Awareness Campaign will run for a two year period. An industry based specialist has been appointed to oversee a regional awareness campaign focusing on improved waste management practices within the municipal and commercial industry sectors.
The waste minimisation program will be measured by the reduction in waste received and the successful resource recovery occurring at the landfill.
Future Initiatives
In addition to the existing kerbside collection, specific waste recycling initiatives have been established at the AWMC and include the following:
free household chemical collection days; free Drum Muster program which focuses on the agricultural sector; two free electronic waste disposal days; battery disposal; oil disposal; paint disposal; cardboard, paper and plastic disposal; gas cylinder disposal; free disposal of steel; free disposal of clean fill; reduced fee for the disposal of separated green waste; and a reduction in fees for the disposal of separated concrete.
Other recycling initiatives such as plasterboard, mattresses, light globes and tyres are being considered, as viable end-of-use processes become available. Legislative changes will dictate these initiatives for resource recovery, which Council will accommodate at the landfill site.
With the introduction of the free entry voucher system, Council has the opportunity to consider whether additional vouchers per residential property be provided to compensate for the removal of the hard waste collection. This will allow the community to deliver their excess waste to the landfill at their convenience, which promotes resource recovery and cultural change. A small portion of the community may have some difficulty accessing this service due to the availability of transport (car and/or trailer). However, with the landfill gate entry being free of charge, via the voucher system, alternative arrangements can be easily established.
Engineering & Works Committee – Monday 8 March 2010 24 AlburyCity – Engineering & Works Committee AGENDA
By discontinuing the annual hard waste collection and increasing the voucher system to four vouchers, Council will be working towards state recovery targets and assisting our community towards positive waste management practices.
It should also be noted that the introduction of an additional two vouchers doubles the volumetric allowance per household (kerbside hard waste allowance is one trailer load).
Northern Valley Development
The Northern Valley development will enable resource recovery to occur across all sectors and waste streams. The development of the Northern Valley will include:
relocation of exiting gatehouse and weighbridge – currently finalising design in preparation for construction; establishment of a green waste storage and mulching area; establishment of a construction and demolition waste sorting area; establishment of a general solid waste (non-putrescibles) landfill in the Northern Valley; establishment of a vehicle transfer station; and development of an enclosed green waste composting facility.
Sustainability
Council currently has the opportunity to change the direction of how waste is managed from within the municipality to increase awareness, coupled with consistent regulatory action to encourage better waste management practices.
Sustainability includes long term strategic planning and consideration of a quadruple bottom line (Social, Environmental, Economic and Governance). The current hard waste program has serious limitations in all these areas. It is clear that despite improvements to the program over the last four years, the cost per quantity of material retrieved has been increasing, and the total mass and range of materials accepted has declined. This is a clear indication that it is not sustainable.
Principles behind sustainable behaviour are that we should try to manage demand and attitudes. This means we need to make it easier for people to do the right thing and improve efficiency and effectiveness by design or approach, rather than increased effort. The changes uphold the principles of personal responsibility and beneficiary pays.
Given that the waste minimisation educational program is starting and infrastructure works are planned, it is timely that changes to more sustainable ways of managing waste be implemented by AlburyCity. The changes can be used as a catalyst for the educational program.
Engineering & Works Committee – Monday 8 March 2010 25 AlburyCity – Engineering & Works Committee AGENDA
Summary
A hard waste collection is an expensive service for Council to manage. Using the expenditure figures of $260,659 for the 2009/2010 financial year, divided by the total amount of waste deposited at the AWMC (647 tonnes), this equates to $402.87 per tonne for disposal.
In view of the future direction of the collection, the following factors need to be considered:
Council’s environmental commitment towards reducing waste to landfill, as per the Regional Waste Minimisation Strategy – reducing volumes to landfill by 100,000 tonne; cost to continue a hard waste collection; increased operating costs to manage a hard waste collection; illegal dumping; scavenging; public liability issues; an acceptable service as perceived by residents; the sub standard recovery of waste being deposited to landfill; and alternatives available to Council.
Conclusion
The waste services offered to residents in the AlburyCity municipality exceed the services offered within other local government areas within NSW. With a reduction of waste at the landfill targeted, one effective measure is to eliminate the annual hard waste collection and organise programs which promote resource recovery.
With the implementation of a waste minimisation program, Council will be promoting waste avoidance, resource recovery and providing more sustainable opportunities for the community.
Recommendation
That Committee recommends to Council that Council: a. discontinue the annual hard waste collection service; b. increases the free entry voucher system to four vouchers; and c. in addition to the existing resource recovery programs in place, explore and introduce other recycling initiatives to promote resource recovery.
Engineering & Works Committee – Monday 8 March 2010 26
ATTACHMENT 2 – 9B
Flowchart – Home Based Collection Process
REQUEST FOR REMOVAL OF WASTE
RESIDENT CONTACTS CUSTOMER SERVICE CUSTOMER SERVICE OFFICER TO FOLLOW THIS PROCESS
QUESTION CUSTOMER ON THE FOLLOWING MATTERS
Do you rent? NO Do you have a current NO voucher?
YES
YES
Need to contact owner/ Real Estate to obtain Voucher. Do you have YES Once voucher is obtained contact transport? Council for eligibility.
NO
Do you have friends or relatives who can assist YES with removal of waste?
NO
ANY OTHER ASSISTANCE? i.e neighbour, maintenance YES company, charity organisations
NO
Do you have a disability or Do you hold a NO NO extenuating circumstances Pension Card? that prevent you from removing the waste?
YES
Lodge a Customer Request YES Including card type and number
Advise collection will not NO be undertaken
ATTACHMENT 3 – 9B
Annual Home Based Collection Procedure
CATEGORY: Waste Management GROUP TEAM: Engineering PROCEDURE Annual Home Based Collection No: 012 NAME:
PURPOSE: This procedure is designed to determine, on a merit basis, the eligibility of residents to access a kerbside hard waste collection service.
SCOPE: The kerbside hard waste collection service has been discontinued and was replaced with four landfill free entry vouchers. It is acknowledged that a portion of the community may suffer hardship as a result of this change. This procedure assesses eligibility to access a home based collection service.
DEFINITIONS:
Nil
REFERENCES:
Local Government Act
ACTIVITY:
Step 1 Resident contacts Council and requests for a hard waste pick up.
Step 2 Customer Service officer follows the flow chart to determine eligibility for a collection.
Where a resident may have a concession card, the Customer Service Officer will be required to confirm the following: Resident address and verification of address on concession card; Eligible concession card and card number Commonwealth Centrelink Concession Card Holder Department of Veteran Affairs Concession Card Holder (incl. war widow and TPI)
Step 3 On determining that the resident is eligible, a CRM is developed with resident details comprising of name, address, phone number, pension number where applicable. The CRM is forwarded to the Street Cleansing Ganger for coordination of collection.
Step 4 Customer Service is to outline the collection and general condition requirements to the resident.
Collection Conditions
One visit annually permitted – two vouchers are to be surrendered to council officers at time of collection. Resident must be home at time of pick up and supervise collection (full day).
AlburyCity Procedure Page 1 of 3
Resident must store all waste in their own yard, NOT on the nature strip. No employees will be entering any homes or sheds. Only permitted 1 trailer equivalent of green waste and/or 1 trailer equivalent of general waste.
Customer Service Guidelines - General Conditions
Bookings can be made from the time residents receive rates and have obtained their vouchers. Street Cleansing Ganger (Landscape Services) will contact the resident to organise a suitable collection time. Collection will occur on business working days only. The following outlines the specific conditions surrounding what is accepted and not accepted as part of the collection and is required to be forwarded to the resident prior to collection.
Household Waste Don't put out anything too heavy;
Items must be able to be lifted to shoulder height by two people. If you can't move it, neither can we.
Don't put out too much, a standard 6 x 4 trailer is the total amount of household waste allowed for collection.
Waste will not be collected that exceeds this amount. Hard Waste items typically include: Small household furniture
Small household appliances
Electrical appliances, tools, equipment, mowers and small car parts
Kitchenware, pottery and crockery
Carpet, rolled and tied please (max 1.5m long) Green Waste Green waste items must be able to be lifted by ONE person;
A standard 6 x 4 trailer load is the total amount of material allowed for green waste collection;
Penalties may apply if waste exceeds this amount. Green Waste items typically include: Branches and prunings less than 1.8 metres in length (no longer than a 6 x 4 trailer);
Small tree roots are acceptable, however must be able to be lifted by one person. What type of items won't be collected Over length and over weight items of any nature;
Waste that exceeds the total volume allowed (a standard 6 x 4 trailer load);
Items that can't be lifted by two people;
AlburyCity Procedure Page 2 of 3
Waste from industrial and commercial premises and business operated from home;
Waste material from construction and demolition of buildings;
Bricks, concrete, stone, clay, sand and soil;
Liquids whether or not in sealed containers including: paint, oil, garden sprays and chemicals;
Hazardous waste, including asbestos;
Tyres, batteries or gas bottles of any type;
Bagged green waste;
Timber greater than 1.8 metres (anything over the standard 6 x 4 trailer length);
Steel or metal (including Large Whitegoods), it is the responsibility of the resident to recycle steel or metal with local recyclers or dispose of at the Albury Waste Management Centre.
Last issued: 24th March 2010 Review : 7th January 2013 Reviewed: 10th August 2012
AlburyCity Procedure Page 3 of 3
ATTACHMENT TO CM 9D – 02/2013
ALBURY 2030 – COMMUNITY STRATEGIC PLAN
ATTACHMENT 1 – 9D
Albury 2030 – Our Community Strategic Plan
LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
ALBURY 2030
Our Community Strategic Plan LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
CONTENTS Forew0rd ...... 3
Our 2030 Community Vision, Our Values, Guiding Principles ...... 4
1.0 Introduction ...... 5
2.0 Where Albury 2030 fits within Council’s Planning Framework ...... 6
3.0 Albury 2030 Structure ...... 7 – 3.1 AlburyCity Measuring Success ...... 8 – 3.2 AlburyCity’s Resourcing Strategies ...... 9
4.0 Links to NSW State Plan and Other Strategies/Plans ...... 10
5.0 Snapshot Albury 2012 ...... 12
6.0 Community Engagement ...... 13 – 6.1 Process ...... 15 – 6.2 What the Community Told Us ...... 17
7.0 The Reviewed Albury 2030 Plan ...... 19 – 7.1 Information Hierarchy ...... 19 – 7.2 Glossary of Acronyms ...... 20
A GROWING ECONOMY ...... 21
AN ENHANCED NATURAL ENVIRONMENT ...... 36
A CARING COMMUNITY ...... 41
A LEADING COMMUNITY ...... 58
2 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
FOREWORD Back in 2005, Council worked with a broad cross-section of our community to produce a Community Strategic Plan that looked forward to the year 2030. That plan – Albury 2030 – has since played a significant role in guiding Council’s decisions. In 2010, after engaging with the community, a reviewed Albury 2030 was adopted by Council. A key feature of Albury 2030 is that it is owned by the Albury community. While it guides Council decision making, it is not a Council plan. Rather, AlburyCity has accepted responsibility for adopting the plan, working with other community stakeholders, overseeing its implementation and reporting back to the community on progress. Part of implementing Albury 2030 is making sure it is regularly reviewed. This is the second time Albury 2030 has undergone this process – this time attracting almost 1,000 responses from an equally broad cross-section of the community. The outcomes within Albury 2030 outline the aspirations that will drive us and our community over the coming few years. This refreshed version of Albury 2030 is very much your plan. It encapsulates your needs and aspirations for Albury and provides a blueprint for exactly how we can work together to achieve them. Albury 2030 combines our goals under the four broad themes of A Growing Economy, An Enhanced Natural Environment, A Caring Community and A Leading Community. Preserving our local identity, attracting visitors, growing our economy, caring for the environment and developing leaders are all fundamental elements of Albury 2030. More than a statement of aspiration, it is a plan for the future of the city with real targets and outcomes. It is our pleasure to present you with this latest version of Albury 2030. We look forward to working alongside you to bring it to fruition.
COUNCILLORS [left to right] Cr David Thurley Cr Daryl Betteridge Cr Kevin Mack (Deputy Mayor) Cr Henk van de Ven Cr Ross Jackson Cr Alice Glachan (Mayor) Cr Darren Cameron Cr Patricia Gould, OAM Cr Graham Docksey, OAM
3 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
OUR 2030 The 2030 vision for Albury was created in 2009 by the community for the community. It takes into account our location, lifestyle and heritage, and looks forward to the year 2030. Working together COMMUNITY VISION to achieve the outcomes within Albury 2030 will move us closer to achieving this vision. “A vibrant, safe and welcoming regional city, drawing inspiration and life from our heritage, strategic location and connection to the majestic River Murray.”
OUR VALUES • Working together through respect for others, listening and valuing all contributions • Integrity through trust, honesty and openness • Courage and passion with foresight and wisdom • New ideas by valuing knowledge and innovation
GUIDING PRINCIPLES Albury 2030 has been developed and based on two sets of guiding principles – social justice and sustainability. Social Justice Principles: • Equity Involving fairness in decision making, prioritising and allocation of resources, particularly for those in need. • Access Having fair access to services, resources and opportunities to improve quality of life. • Participation The maximum opportunity to genuinely participate in decisions which affect their lives. • Rights Equal rights established and promoted, with opportunities provided for people from diverse linguistic, cultural and religious backgrounds to participate in community life.
Sustainability Principle: • Sustainability The Albury 2030 plan has regard for the sustainability principle taken from the World Commission on Environment and Development (the Brundtland Commission) report Our Common Future. This principle is also considered and reflected within AlburyCity’s Sustainability Strategy – Albury Our Future. “Development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.”
4 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
1.0 INTRODUCTION In 2005, Council worked with community leaders to create a document that planned for Albury’s future. The document, Albury 2030, played a significant role in guiding Council’s decisions and influencing future projects. In 2009, a new integrated planning and reporting (IP&R) framework for NSW local government was introduced. With the emphasis on ‘integrated’, this framework ensured that councils prepared a long-term Community Strategic Plan (CSP) with a resourcing strategy, a community engagement strategy, a delivery program and an operational plan. All other council plans were required to integrate with this highest level plan. Different reporting requirements were outlined for the different planning documents. In keeping with the IP&R requirement, AlburyCity worked with the Albury community to review the Community Strategic Plan in 2009, and the new Albury 2030 was adopted in 2010.
Local Government Planning and Reporting framework
Community Strategic In the year of an ordinary Council election, the Community Strategic Plan must Plan be reviewed to determine any new directions for the next term of Council. The 10 years+ reviewed plan will be adopted by the incoming Council prior to 30 June 2013. A key feature of Albury 2030 is that it is not a Council plan. Instead, the Resourcing content and direction of the plan are determined by the community. Strategyg AlburyCity does have direct carriage of some of the projects within Albury 2030, but approximately half of the projects and actions belong to Delivery Program other agencies. 4 years Albury 2030 Perpetual monitoring & Achievement of the outcomes within will bring the community review framework closer to achieving its vision. OperationalOperational Plan Annual
Annual Report
5 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
2.0 WHERE ALBURY 2030 ALBURY 2030 COMMUNITY Community Engagement STRATEGIC PLAN State of the FITS Strategy Environment Report LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENT • Comprises community LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENT REVISED: FOUR-YEARLY aspirations outcomes, strategic REVISED: FOUR-YEARLY actions (including those from other organisations) and outcome measures. Resourcing Strategy • 10 year Asset Management Plans LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENT End of Term Report • 10 year Financial Plan REVISED: FOUR-YEARLY • Report on achievements of Albury 2030 • 4 year Workforce during Council term Management Plan LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENT LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENT REVISED: FOUR-YEARLY REVISED: FOUR-YEARLY Funded Delivery Program • Budget • Tasks linked to Albury 2030 Sub-Strategies and Plans • Position responsible Local Environmental Plan • Eg. Road Safety Strategic Plan • Outcome measures LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENT • Parking Strategy REVISED: FIVE-YEARLY LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENT REVISED: TIME-FRAME VARIES REVISED: FOUR-YEARLY Corporate Plan • Outlining desired organisational ENDORSED BY Funded Operational Plan culture and relevant projects • Budget REVISED: FOUR-YEARLY ■ Council • Annual Operating tasks from 4-year Delivery Program ■ Manex /Group Director • Outcome measures ■ Director / Supervisor LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENT REVISED: ANNUALLY
Group Business Plan The Community Strategic Plan is the highest level planning document for • Reflects Group’s mission, plus obligations in the one-year Albury. Albury Council, other agencies, stakeholders and the community Operational Plan all have a part to play in achieving the aspirations of Albury 2030. REVISED: ANNUALLY Relevant stakeholders and agencies are consulted during the development of the community plan and have responsibility for undertaking some of the strategic actions. Annual Officer Work Plans
The flowchart demonstrates where Albury 2030 fits within Council’s REVISED: ANNUALLY planning framework, and also illustrates the links between other strategies and plans. AlburyCity has accepted responsibility for adopting the Community Strategic Plan, overseeing its implementation and reporting back to the community on progress.
6 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
3.0 ALBURY 2030 “The purpose of the Community Strategic Plan is to identify the community’s main priorities and aspirations for the future and to plan strategies for achieving these goals. In STRUCTURE doing this, the planning process will consider the issues and pressures that may affect the community and the level of resources that will realistically be available to achieve its aims and aspirations…” (Source: Division of Local Government Planning and Reporting Manual) In keeping with the IP&R framework, Albury 2030 was developed as a long-term plan in consultation with the community. The plan identifies community aspirations under four themes: • A Growing Economy • An Enhanced Natural Environment • A Caring Community • A Leading Community. The diagram below represents the four themes and the components of the quadruple bottom line addressing social, environmental, economic and civic leadership issues. The four themes are not four separate silos, but are linked to each other to demonstrate that issues are not isolated within a single theme. The plan is integrated, with strategies crossing over more than one theme.
THEME 1 THEME 2 THEME 3 THEME 4 A Growing An Enhanced A Caring A Leading Economy Natural Community Community Environment
7 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
3.1 ALBURYCITY AlburyCity has a number of statutory responsibilities to implement the Community MEASURING Strategic Plan and to report to the community on progress.
SUCCESS The four-year Delivery Program details all actions required by Council to implement the Community Strategic Plan during the four-year period. This is reviewed each year when preparing the next year’s Operational Plan.
The one-year Operational Plan identifies specific strategic initiatives that will be funded each year.
The six-monthly Council review is a report to Council by the General Manager. It outlines progress in implementing the Council actions in the Operational Plan.
The Annual Report details the achievements of projects within the four-year Delivery Program.
The Resourcing Strategy includes the Long Term Financial Plan (10 years), the Asset Management Strategy (10 years) and the Workforce Management Strategy (5 years). The Resourcing Strategy outlines how Council can deliver on the outcomes of the Community Strategic Plan.
The End of Term Report identifies the achievements of the Community Strategic Plan and is presented to the final meeting of the Council term.
The State of the Environment Report is included in the Annual Report in the year of the ordinary council election. It reports on the environmental objectives of the Community Strategic Plan.
The four-year review of the Community Strategic Plan is required after each local government election.
8 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
3.2 ALBURYCITY’S Council does not have full responsibility for implementing or resourcing all the community aspirations identified within Albury 2030; other stakeholders also have a role in delivering RESOURCING some of the outcomes. The development of the AlburyCity Resourcing Strategy provides an STRATEGY opportunity to quantify Council’s contributions through planning for the provision of resources required to implement the Albury 2030 outcomes.
The AlburyCity Resourcing Strategy comprises three components:
1. Asset Management Strategy
Local councils manage a wide range of assets that enable the provision of infrastructure and services to the community. These assets include roads and trails, water and sewerage infrastructure, bridges, footpaths, public buildings, sporting grounds and facilities, parks and playgrounds. The Asset Management Strategy considers ‘whole of life’ asset management from planning, purchase, operation and maintenance to disposal of assets. New requests for infrastructure identified within Albury 2030 must be considered and costed from purchase to disposal. Albury 2030 is integrated with the Asset Management Strategy, enabling Council to show how the assets support the service delivery and infrastructure needs of the Albury community. The Asset Management Strategy forecasts community requirements and the capacity to meet them on a short-, medium- and long-term basis.
2. Workforce Management Strategy
To undertake the strategic actions and work towards the long-term outcomes identified within Albury 2030, Council must plan for its medium- and long-term human resource requirements. The Workforce Management Strategy extends for a minimum of four years and addresses issues such as staff development, skill shortages, an ageing workforce, and succession planning in relation to the achievement of Albury 2030 outcomes.
3. Long Term Financial Plan
Financial planning in consideration of Albury 2030 is crucial to test community aspirations against financial realities. The AlburyCity Long Term Financial Plan is a 10-year plan intended as a guide for future action. It is integrated with Albury 2030 more specifically through the four-year Delivery Program and the one-year Operational Plan.
9 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
4.0 LINKS TO The development and review of Albury 2030 has given due regard to the State Plan NSW 2021, the Destination 2036 Local Government Plan and other relevant state or regional NSW STATE PLAN strategies. The four themes and associated outcomes of Albury 2030 reflect the strategies AND OTHER and strategic directions of NSW 2021 and Destination 2036. STRATEGIES/PLANS NSW 2021 has five strategies: Rebuild the Economy, Return Quality Services, Renovate Infrastructure, Strengthen Our Environment, and Restore Accountability to Government. To help achieve these strategies, the NSW Government conducted regional forums to hear issues and priorities directly from communities. The resulting Murray-Lower Darling Regional Action Plan identifies immediate actions the NSW Government will prioritise. Achieving the desired outcomes of Albury 2030 will work towards the achievement of these regional priorities. Destination 2036 has five strategic directions: Efficient and Effective Service Delivery, Quality Governance, Financial Sustainability, Appropriate Structures, and Strong Relationships. Other strategies and plans considered during the development of Albury 2030 include: • NSW: A New Direction for Mental Health 2006–2011 • NSW Immunisation Strategy • Regional Development Australia (Murray) – Riverina Regional Plan 2010–2015 • Riverina Murray NSW Homelessness Action Plan • Cultural Harmony – the Next Decade 2002–2012 • NSW Government Communities: Arts NSW – Corporate Plan 2010–2012 • Planning and Reporting Framework for NSW Local Government • Local Government Act 1993 and Local Government Regulation 2005 • AlburyCity Economic Development Strategy 2012–2015 • AlburyCity Tourism and Destination Marketing Strategy 2010–2013 • Albury Our Future: A Sustainability Strategy for Albury • AlburyCity Cultural Plan 2012–2016 AlburyCity Social Plan.
Different targets and outcome measures within Albury 2030 specifically reflect the goals within NSW 2021. These have been identified for the four themes. Achievement of the Albury 2030 outcomes will contribute to the overall achievement of NSW 2021 strategies.
10 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
4.0 LINKS TO NSW STATE PLAN AND OTHER STRATEGIES/PLANS CONTINUED
ALBURY 2030 ALBURY 2030 ALBURY 2030 ALBURY 2030 A Growing An Enhanced A Caring A Leading Economy Natural Community Community Environment
NSW 2021 GOALS NSW 2021 GOALS NSW 2021 GOALS NSW 2021 GOALS
GOAL 1: Improve the performance of the GOAL 22: Protect our natural GOAL 5: Place downward pressure on the GOAL 1: Improve the performance of the NSW economy environment cost of living NSW economy GOAL 3: Drive economic growth in GOAL 23: Increase opportunities for GOAL 6: Strengthen the NSW skill base GOAL 32: Involve the community in regional NSW people to look after their own GOAL 10: Improve road safety decision making on Government policy, neighbourhoods and environments services and projects GOAL 7: Reduce travel times GOAL 11: Keep people healthy and out of hospital GOAL 8: Grow patronage on public GOAL 13: Better protect the most vulnerable transport by making it a more attractive members of our community and break the choice cycle of disadvantage GOAL 9: Improve customer experience GOAL 15: Improve education and learning with transport services outcomes for all students GOAL 21: Secure potable water supplies GOAL 16: Prevent and reduce the level of crime GOAL 30: Restore trust in state and local government as a service provider GOAL 23: Increase opportunities for people to look after their own neighbourhoods and environments GOAL 24: Make it easier for people to be involved in their communities GOAL 25: Increase opportunities for seniors in NSW to fully participate in community life GOAL 26: Fostering opportunity and partnership with Aboriginal people GOAL 27: Enhance cultural creative, sporting and recreational opportunities GOAL 30: Restore trust in state and local government as a service provider
11 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
5.0 SNAPSHOT Albury is a modern, vibrant city on the northern banks of the Murray River in the Riverina region of south-eastern New South Wales. Located 300 kilometres north-east of ALBURY 2012 Melbourne and 570 kilometres south-west of Sydney, the city covers 313 square kilometres and has a population of 49,467. 1 Albury’s economy is diverse and resilient. It is the major manufacturing, retail, commercial, administrative and cultural centre for the region. Most recent available figures show the Gross Regional Product (GRP) is valued at $3.08 billion and output (Gross Revenue) is $6.84 billion. There are approximately 4,000 businesses in Albury and there continues to be a high level of business confidence with major construction projects continuing and many in the planning process. Albury is home to the national headquarters of Telstra Countrywide, which services approximately three million customers; Charles Sturt University campus provides 3,500 students with a range of business, information technology, environmental, educational and allied health courses; and a major administrative centre for the Australian Taxation Office is located in Albury. The Albury region has a unique multicultural heritage. Traditionally the home of the Wiradjuri people, the region became home to German, Dutch, Italian, Greek, Philippine and Polish migrant communities after World War II. More recently, Vietnamese, Laotian, Albanian, Bhutanese and Bosnian residents have contributed to the city’s vital, cosmopolitan feel.
QUICK STATISTICS 2 Median age: 37 Median total personal income: $558 per week Median mortgage repayment: $1,452 per month Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders: 1,108 people Highest age-group proportion: 45–54 years (13%) 2011 internet connections 65% (2006: 35%) Completed Year 12 or equivalent: 31%
1. Based on Australian Bureau of Statistics 3218.0 Regional Population Growth, Australia Table 1. 2. Based on Census 2011 data showing population 47,810.
12 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
6.0 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
“ Promote proximity to the river.” “ More community gardens”
“ More opportunities for the community to get together” “ Extend weekend bus services…”
“ More public art” “ We love everything about Albury”
“ Cheaper access to solar panels…”
“ A youth council of grade 5/6 kids…”
“ More green space in Albury”
13 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
6.0 COMMUNITY Community engagement means involving community members in all activities, from identifying the relevant issues and making decisions about how to address them to ENGAGEMENT evaluating and sharing the results with the community. CONTINUED Under the Local Government Act, Council must prepare and implement a Community Engagement Strategy for engaging with the local community in developing and reviewing the Community Strategic Plan. Under Essential Element 1.5, the Community Engagement Strategy must, at a minimum, identify relevant stakeholder groups within the community and outline methods of engaging each group. A Community Engagement Strategy was developed for the review of Albury 2030. It can be found on the AlburyCity website under ‘Have a Say – Past community engagement plans’. The community engagement matrix is as follows.
ENGAGEMENT METHODS AlburyCity Primary High Community Workshops Facebook / AlburyCity Community “Accent on Shopping Other Refugee Media Retirement Focus School School Group Social Website Satisfaction Albury” Centres AlburyCity Week Newspaper Villages GROUPS Group Visits Visits Present’ns Media Survey Newsletter Consults Radio
Community ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Households
Aged Community ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●
Youth ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●
Persons with a ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Disability
Culturally and ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Linguistically Diverse Community
Business ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Stakeholders
Aboriginal ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Community
Environmental ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Groups
Government ● ● ● ● ● Agencies
14 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
6.1 PROCESS Community Engagement Community engagement for the review of Albury 2030 was undertaken from 1 June 2012 to 19 October 2012. The purpose of the engagement was to obtain feedback on the existing outcomes of Albury 2030 (developed by the community in 2009–2010) and determine any new priorities or directions for the next four years of the long-term plan. At the completion of the consultation period, 911 representations had been received from the community. A range of engagement methods were utilised to ensure that a maximum number of community members had the opportunity to be heard. These included: • Presentations to community groups including Rotary, Probus and retirement villages (123 in attendance) • Presentation and discussion with Youth Council (9 in attendance) • Presentation and discussion with Albury Access Group (15 in attendance) • Two public workshops (37 in attendance) • ‘Outcomes gallery’ for AlburyCity staff, Councillors and after workshops (176 comments received) • Presentations to primary and high school groups (124 in attendance) • Consultation at the Refugee Family Fun Day (48 in feedback groups) • E-mails, letters and surveys to the AlburyCity Focus Group (160 members received information and opportunity to comment) • Accent on Albury newsletter (delivered to every household and business in Albury LGA) • Five days of ‘Listening posts’ at shopping centres (large numbers had opportunity to comment, 74 provided comment) • Twitter • “Have a Say” – AlburyCity website (492 total visits to page; 29 provided feedback) • Results from the Community Satisfaction Survey conducted in October 2011 (400 respondents) • Radio and newspaper advertising • Albury 2030 surveys (71 completed) • Wiradjuri Community Working Party (29 in attendance) • Discussions with Aboriginal leaders on outcomes and actions • Agency one-on-one interviews • Consultation workshop with Councillors.
15 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
6.1 PROCESS The two community workshops were held over two consecutive nights and involved four CONTINUED guest speakers on each night. The presentations were about tourism and economic development, integrated transport, crime and safety, mental health, education, access for all abilities, Aboriginal issues, and the environment. At the conclusion of each presentation, discussions were held with participants under each of the relevant outcomes of Albury 2030.
Consideration of Other Engagement
In addition to the consultation specifically targeting Albury 2030, consideration was given to the comments received during consultation for ‘Albury Our Future’, the Cultural Plan, the Social Plan, and the Economic Development Strategy. Extensive community engagement was completed to inform these strategies and relevant comments were considered as part of the Albury 2030 review.
Gap Analysis
The comments were categorised under the four themes of Albury 2030 and then provided to AlburyCity staff to identify whether any of the issues raised were being addressed through other AlburyCity strategies. This analysis found that many of the issues raised by the community were already being addressed under sub-strategies linked with Albury 2030. These include ‘Albury Our Future’, the Cultural Plan, the Social Plan, the draft Biodiversity Strategy, the Crime Prevention Plan, the Road Safety Strategy, the Parking Strategy, the Events Strategy, the Murray River Experience Master Plan, the CBD Strategies, the Economic Development Strategy, the Tourism and Destination Marketing Strategy, the Corporate Communications Strategy and the Albury Bicycle Plan.
16 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
6.2 WHAT THE Of the 911 submissions received during the consultation period, COMMUNITY • 41% addressed the theme A Growing Economy, TOLD US... • 36% A Caring Community, • 12% A Leading Community and • 11% An Enhanced Natural Environment
A Leading ALBURY 2030 SURVEY Community The top three responses to the question: What makes Albury the most appealing to you as a place to live? • 66% family and friends • 44% river and mountains access A Growing • 37% education opportunities Economy
The top three responses to the question: A Caring What do you see as the opportunities for Albury’s future? Community • 63% tourist destination • 51% regional centre for education • 48% city of entertainment
85% of respondents chose to rank a number of issues in priority order. The issues included safety, being inclusive, tourism, education, health, An Enhanced environment, economic growth and access to technology. The issues were well Natural Environment spread within priority one; however education was the highest, followed by health, then safety.
17 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
6.2 WHAT THE COMMUNITY TOLD US... CONTINUED
ALBURY 2030 SURVEY Showcase Albury through events and festivals. The comments received from the community were provided under the themes and outcomes of Albury 2030. The top five areas where people commented Promote proximity to were: Murray River. More bike paths. More programs and 1. Improve visitor and residents’ experiences activities for young people. – 89 comments More education about sharing the road More activities for people 2.Albury offers a diverse range of facilities and activities for all ages with bikes. with a disability. – 83 comments 3.Increase tourism to Albury and the surrounding region What the – 70 comments community 4.Reduce Albury’s ecological footprint told us… – 57 comments
More bus services, 5. Integrated transport network for Albury More education about longer hours and on – 56 comments. environmental issues. public holidays. Keep saving water Improve the train regardless of rainfall. to Melbourne. Keep the tourists in Albury.
Better promotion of Albury as a tourist destination.
18 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
7.0 THE REVIEWED The following plan is the result of a review of Albury 2030 as adopted by Council on behalf ALBURY 2030 of the community in 2010. The review has involved extensive community engagement, a PLAN gap analysis in relation to community issues and what is already being undertaken, interviews with stakeholder groups and agencies, an assessment of AlburyCity sub- strategies and projects completed and the identification of strategic actions required to achieve community aspirations for the next four years. The plan contains a number of outcomes sought under each theme. Where possible, the plan indicates a timeframe for each strategic action. Realistic and measurable targets have been included to assist with reporting actions and achievements. Responsibilities are also noted. This reflects the true community nature of the plan – while AlburyCity has a large part to play in bringing the plan to life, a number of strategic actions are the direct responsibility of other agencies or stakeholders. The community also has a role to play as a stakeholder in achieving the outcomes of the plan, and areas where the community can help have been outlined separately for each outcome.
7.1 INFORMATION Albury 2030 has a hierarchical structure feeding down from the four Themes. HIERARCHY Outcomes are the highest level aspirations of the community and the Strategic actions show how the outcomes will be achieved. Timeframes show start and end dates of projects, and Organisations responsible are listed to demonstrate that Council is not wholly responsible for the achieving the community outcomes. Outcome measures show methods of determining whether an outcome is being met and Targets are used to help with reporting on the plan’s progress. Achievement of targets feeds upwards to achieving the outcome measures and ultimately the outcomes (community aspirations) of the Community Strategic Plan.
19 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
7.2 GLOSSARY OF ACSUM Alliance of the Councils and Shires of the Upper Murray ACRONYMS BOCSAR Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research CBD Central business district CMA Catchment Management Authority CPTED Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design CSP Community Strategic Plan CSU Charles Sturt University CWP Community Working Party DECCW Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water DEEWR Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations GRP Gross Regional Product IP&R Integrated Planning and Reporting LGA Local Government Area MICEEP Murray Industry and Community Education Employment Partnership NBN National Broadband Network OEH Office of Environment and Heritage RAMROC Riverina and Murray Regional Organisation of Councils RDA Regional Development Australia RFS Rural Fire Service RMS Roads and Maritime Services SES State Emergency Services U3A University of the Third Age YES Youth Emergency Services
20 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
THEME 1 A Growing Economy
This theme recognises the need to grow the city and its population so that businesses can confidently increase and expand their workforce. Integrated transport routes will meet the needs of this growing city and connect Albury to the national and global economy by road, rail and air. As a community, we will enhance, promote and maintain the built environment and be a leader in health and education services. Key outcomes have been identified by the community and the strategic actions will help bring the outcomes to life.
21 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
A GROWING Outcome 1.1 • Increase Visitors to Albury and the Surrounding Region ECONOMY NO. STRATEGIC ACTION TIMEFRAME ORGANISATIONS RESPONSIBLE
1.1.1 Review the Tourism and Destination 2010-2013 • AlburyCity (Economic Development Strategy-task) WHAT THE Marketing Strategy and prepare and For review 2013 • Murray Regional Tourism Board COMMUNITY CAN DO... implement a Destination Management Plan • Destination NSW
• Attend local festivals and events. 1.1.2 Promote tourism – through a collaborative Ongoing • AlburyCity • Promote Albury accommodation approach between all stakeholders and • Murray Regional Tourism Board and eateries. interest groups. • Destination NSW • Tourism businesses • Promote Albury’s attractions and • Tourism Victoria events to friends and visitors. • Wodonga Council • Read the Albury Wodonga Official Visitors Guide. 1.1.3 Improve access to the Murray River – the Ongoing • AlburyCity Murray River Experience Master Plan and • Visit the river with friends and the Wagirra Trail project. visitors, access the Wagirra trail. • Visit 1.1.4 Invite outlying communities to be involved Ongoing • AlburyCity www.visitalburywodonga.com.au in the promotion of the region. • Murray Regional Tourism Board • Destination NSW • Tourism businesses • Tourism Victoria
1.1.5 Develop and strengthen the City’s visitor 2012-2015 • AlburyCity Business / Investors product and infrastructure. Ensure its effective marketing and promotion.
1.1.6 Provide opportunities for cultural tourism 2012-2015 • AlburyCity (Cultural Services Strategic Plan) • Tourism Providers • Cultural Industry
22 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
A GROWING Outcome 1.1 • Increase Visitors to Albury and the Surrounding Region ECONOMY OUTCOME MEASURES TARGET 2016
1.1a Visitor statistics for Albury and Murray Region Maintain upward trend in relation to Domestic Overnight Visitors to Albury, (418,000 in 2012)
Maintain upward trend in relation to International Overnight Visitors to Albury (14,947 in 2012)
Increase the economic impact of Overnight Visitors (International and Domestic) in Albury by 2% from $127,348m (2012) (source Albury Tourism Monitor)
1.1b Ranking in Regional Tourism Indicators Maintain or improve current ranking of 16th most visited destination in regional NSW and Victoria
Maintain or improve current ranking as 2nd most popular destination in the surrounding region. (source Albury Tourism Monitor)
1.1c No. of employees in sector Increase number of employed persons (from 1930 in 2012) in the Albury accommodation, cafes and restaurants sector by 2% (source Albury Tourism Monitor)
1.1d Sector % of Gross Regional Product (GRP) (3.6% in 2010) Increase ‘Accommodation and Food Services’ sector percentage of GRP. (2012 value-add contribution of sector was $106,351 million or 3.7%) (source Albury Tourism Monitor)
23 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
A GROWING OUTCOME 1.2 • IMPROVE VISITOR AND RESIDENTS' EXPERIENCES ECONOMY NO. STRATEGIC ACTION TIMEFRAME ORGANISATIONS RESPONSIBLE
1.2.1 Develop and present a range of events to Ongoing • AlburyCity WHAT THE attract and engage our diverse community • Event partners COMMUNITY CAN DO... 1.2.2 Explore ways to improve the public Ongoing: Cultural • AlburyCity • Attend local festivals and events. knowledge of, and access to, local Services Strategic • Cultural Industry • Don’t litter. Use a bin. community and cultural heritage. Plan – 2010-2015
• Have a look at the Albury 1.2.3 Generate a sense of identity in the Ongoing: Cultural • AlburyCity Wodonga Official Visitors Guide. community – through place making Services Strategic • Event partners • Promote Albury’s attractions and activities eg. Twilight Markets, Wood Fired Plan – 2010-2015 • Cultural industry events to friends and visitors. Oven, Cinema Under Stars.
• Report graffiti to Police. 1.2.4 Support and participate in World War 1 2014-2018 • AlburyCity • Show your visitors Albury before anniversary commemorations • Event partners you show them the region. • Cultural industry
• Smile at your customers. 1.2.5 Implement the prioritised actions from the 2012-2016 priority • AlburyCity • Visit the Albury Visitor Albury and Lavington CBD’s Master Plan actions •RMS Information Centre. 1.2.6 Encourage innovative and modern design Ongoing • AlburyCity • Visit the Cultural Precinct and for the built environment – maximise Botanic Gardens community choice and vibrancy • Visit www.visitalburywodonga.com.au 1.2.7 Implement tree planting programs to reflect Ongoing • AlburyCity the character of Albury
1.2.8 Increase visitor services at the Albury Ongoing • AlburyCity Visitor Information Centre, and raise awareness of the Centre’s existence.
1.2.9 Implement the Urban and Public Art 2010-2020 • AlburyCity Strategy • Cultural industry •Artists • Developers
24 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
A GROWING OUTCOME 1.2 • IMPROVE VISITOR AND RESIDENTS' EXPERIENCES ECONOMY OUTCOME MEASURES TARGET 2016
Visitor Satisfaction survey Conduct Visitor Satisfaction Survey in 2013
1.2a AlburyCity Community Satisfaction Survey Conduct Community Satisfaction survey by end October 2013. Conduct every two years from 2013.
Improved satisfaction with Albury Visitor information Centre compared with 2011 results (3.26/5)
Improved satisfaction with AlburyCity events compared with 2011 results (3.73/5)
1.2b Albury Visitor Information Centre statistics: Increased number of walk ins compared with 2011-2012 – (base 2011- 2012) (20,093) • Walk ins • Phone / email enquiries Increased number of enquiries compared with 2011-2012 • Services provided (24,165 inc. walk ins).
Increase in services provided compared with 2011-2012 – (14)
25 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
A GROWING OUTCOME 1.3 • PLAN AND CATER FOR INCREASED POPULATION GROWTH ECONOMY NO. STRATEGIC ACTION TIMEFRAME ORGANISATIONS RESPONSIBLE
1.3.1 Support and encourage a diversity of Ongoing • AlburyCity WHAT THE residential and commercial development in • Development Industry COMMUNITY CAN DO... the Albury and Lavington CBDs. • Govt. Agencies
• Consider accessing local business 1.3.2 Support Albury’s population growth – • Dept. Planning expertise ensure policies facilitate sustainable growth • Infrastructure providers • Consider future Council planning and housing choice without compromising documents. Albury’s values.
• Create opportunities for trainees, Progress development of AlburyCity Ongoing • AlburyCity work experience and Structure Plans and/or Master Plans apprenticeships. • Thurgoona/Wirlinga • Facilitate new jobs in the area. • Splitters Creek • Lake Hume and TableTop Villages • Keep up to date with progress of • TableTop the NBN roll-out. 1.3.3 Review and monitor the Local Environment 2010-2015 and 5 • AlburyCity Plan and the Development Control Plan – yearly thereafter. • Dept. Planning with regard to outcomes within Albury 2030.
1.3.4 Support and advocate the rollout of the 2012-2013 RDA • RDA Murray National Broadband Network (NBN) Regional Plan • AlburyCity 2010-2015
26 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
A GROWING OUTCOME 1.3 • PLAN AND CATER FOR INCREASED POPULATION GROWTH ECONOMY OUTCOME MEASURES TARGET 2016
1.3a Albury Land Monitor Maintain a diversity of options amongst all sectors and (residential, commercial and industrial sectors) continue to meet demand for opportunities for land development.
Maintain existing development with opportunities for infill development.
Achieve a minimum 10 years supply of undeveloped urban land (commercial, industrial and residential). (Source Albury Land Monitor)
1.3b Population Growth 1% growth per annum (in line with 20 year average)
(State population growth 09-10 1.5%; National population growth 09-10 1.7%) State Rank 09/10: Albury ranked 53 for largest growth-1.3%) (Source: ABS 3218.0 – Regional Population Growth,Australia, 2009-10)
27 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
A GROWING OUTCOME 1.4 • ALBURY HAS A SECURE AND WELL MANAGED WATER SUPPLY ECONOMY NO. STRATEGIC ACTION TIMEFRAME ORGANISATIONS RESPONSIBLE
1.4.1 Implement initiatives to reduce potable Ongoing • AlburyCity WHAT THE water consumption - for residents, business • Water associations and authorities COMMUNITY CAN DO... and industry • Government agencies
• Plant a low water garden. 1.4.2 Consider and introduce, where applicable, Ongoing • AlburyCity • Report any water irregularities to alternate water supply opportunities such • Water associations and authorities Council as wastewater reuse and stormwater • Government agencies harvesting. • Shorten your shower by a minute or two. 1.4.3 Ensure the systems are flexible and can Ongoing • AlburyCity • Upgrade older toilets to half flush cope with wet times and very dry times. • Water associations and authorities models. Ensure system is as efficient as possible in terms of water and power. • Use a broom instead of a hose to clean your driveway and paved areas. • Use a commercial car wash that recycles water. • When required, follow water OUTCOME MEASURES TARGET 2016 restrictions. 1.4a Reduced per capita water consumption Reduce per capita potable water consumption by 1% per year based on a five-year rolling average (base data 2009/10)
1.4b NSW State Government Water Management indicators Reduce complaints relating to water per 1,000 properties by 20% (based on 2010 – 5)
Reduce average duration of interruption to service by 20% (based on 2010 – 180 minutes)
28 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
A GROWING OUTCOME 1.5 • PROMOTE ALBURY FOR INDUSTRY AND BUSINESS ECONOMY NO. STRATEGIC ACTION TIMEFRAME ORGANISATIONS RESPONSIBLE
1.5.1 Promote Albury as a major regional Ongoing • Tourism businesses WHAT THE economy and the regional city of choice for • AlburyCity (Economic Development Strategy) COMMUNITY CAN DO... lifestyle, career and investment • EvoCities alliance opportunities. • Business to business promotion of opportunities in Albury. 1.5.2 Develop a program to encourage local 2012-2015 • AlburyCity (Economic Development Strategy) • Look locally for job opportunities. business to promote Albury through its business networks. • Promote available information sources to potential new 1.5.3 Encourage businesses and industries to 2012-2013 RDA • RDA Murray Regional Plan residents participate in the Commonwealth’s Clean Murray Regional • AlburyCity • Shop locally to support our local Energy Future initiatives. Plan • Business / Industry economy 1.5.4 Implement the AlburyCity 2012-2015 2012-2015 • AlburyCity • Word of mouth promotion of Economic Development Strategy priorities • RDA Murray business opportunities • Govt agencies including NSW Dept of Trade, Investment, Regional Infrastructure and Services.
1.5.5 Grow and develop medical and health Ongoing • Albury Wodonga Health services, health training and educational • Hume Medicare Local services. • Medical associations •CSU • Riverina TAFE • NSW Rural Medical School • Border Medical Recruitment Taskforce • AlburyCity (advocacy role)
1.5.6 Support and promote business and Ongoing • AlburyCity business opportunities across all sectors to • Chambers of Commerce continue to foster economic diversity. • NSW Business Chamber • Australian Industry Group
29 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
A GROWING OUTCOME 1.5 • PROMOTE ALBURY FOR INDUSTRY AND BUSINESS ECONOMY OUTCOME MEASURES TARGET 2016
1.5a Gross regional product (GRP) incl. at sector level 5% growth per annum. (From $2.84B –Jan 2011 to $2.98B) (2007-2011: 7.04% per annum)
1.5b People employed in these sectors Participation rate of working age population to remain at least 1% above NSW state average. (2010: NSW 77%, Albury 78%)
1.5c Unemployment rate Unemployment rate in Albury not to exceed state average by more than 2%.
30 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
A GROWING OUTCOME 1.6 • INTEGRATED TRANSPORT NETWORK FOR ALBURY ECONOMY NO. STRATEGIC ACTION TIMEFRAME ORGANISATIONS RESPONSIBLE
1.6.1 Develop and implement the AlburyCity 2013-2016 • AlburyCity WHAT THE Integrated Transport Strategy COMMUNITY CAN DO... 1.6.2 Implement the CBD Parking Strategy 2010-2015 • AlburyCity • Pressure State and Federal Government for improved 1.6.3 Increase bus service hours and days of Ongoing • Bus companies transport links. operation • Transport NSW • Report safety and maintenance • Public and Com. Transport Working Group issues of roads and footpaths to Council. 1.6.4 Improve train services between capital Ongoing • RailCorp cities • Government Agencies • Talk to bus companies about • Country Link / V/Line increasing hours of operation, • AlburyCity advocacy role and operation on weekends and public holidays, and then 1.6.5 Increase cycling as a transport mode 2012-2016 • Bicycle User Groups patronise the services. • AlburyCity • Use alternative transport where • Community possible and available. 1.6.6 Continue to develop the Airport – to grow Ongoing • AlburyCity passenger numbers
1.6.7 Support development and promotion of the Ongoing • Government agencies Inland Rail Network including goods, freight • AlburyCity and passengers. • Businesses
1.6.8 Promote access to taxis for all members of Ongoing • Albury Taxi Companies the community. Plan for additional services • Transport Providers in areas of peak demand. • Public and Com. Transport Working Group
31 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
A GROWING OUTCOME 1.6 • INTEGRATED TRANSPORT NETWORK FOR ALBURY ECONOMY OUTCOME MEASURES TARGET 2016
1.6a Passengers using public transport Improve number of train passengers into and from Albury by 2% based on 2010 figures.
Total passengers arriving and departing – Albury Station: 2008: 52,252; 2009: 98,695; 2010: 120,648 (source GIPA Rail Corp 2011)
“Total Countrylink services increased by 7.6% in 2009/2010 compared with 2008/2009”. (source: Transport NSW Annual Report 09/10)
Improve number of bus services per week by 2%. Dysons: approximately 131 services/week (2010) Martins: approximately 200 services/week (2010)
Improve infrastructure at bus stops by installing a minimum of 20 bus seats and five bus shelters. (AlburyCity)
1.6b Car parking availability Provide industry best practice of meeting parking demand (<85% peak occupancy)
1.6c Intersection and road network efficiency Seek to maintain level of service at Council’s 10 busiest intersections at a classification of ‘D’. (Classification is an analytical measure relating to saturation and delay times).
32 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
A GROWING OUTCOME 1.7 • INCREASED USAGE OF BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN TRAILS ECONOMY NO. STRATEGIC ACTION TIMEFRAME ORGANISATIONS RESPONSIBLE
1.7.1 Implement and Review the AlburyCity 2012-2016 • AlburyCity WHAT THE Bicycle Plan – to enhance sharing the road •RMS COMMUNITY CAN DO... education and bicycle infrastructure.
• Become familiar with the Albury 1.7.2 Provide clearly marked bicycle lanes Ongoing • AlburyCity trails brochure and investigate throughout the city – Construct wider the bike trails in your area. footpaths where located close to current or • Discuss unsafe or inaccessible proposed off-road cycle paths for shared areas for pedestrians with use. Council. 1.7.3 Promote bicycle travel as efficient and Ongoing • AlburyCity • Identify path sections lacking healthy alternative to car travel – •RMS connectivity – report to Council. infrastructure and businesses to support • Businesses • Leave the car at home; walk or this. ride a bike instead. 1.7.4 Provide secure bicycle parking 2012-2016 • AlburyCity • Talk to your workplace about opportunities across the city • Businesses installing bicycle facilities and • Educational providers showers. 1.7.5 Implement and review the Pedestrian 2012-2016 • AlburyCity Access and Mobility Plan (PAMP) •RMS
1.7.6 Improve connectivity of cycle paths 2012-2016 • AlburyCity • Businesses
33 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
A GROWING OUTCOME 1.7 • INCREASED USAGE OF BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN TRAILS ECONOMY OUTCOME MEASURES TARGET 2016
1.7a Length of available bicycle lanes Increase length of off-road bicycle paths by at least 1000m (base 2010)
Increase network of on-road bike lanes by 400m through line marking and reconfiguration of lanes where able. (base 2010)
1.7b Usage of bicycle paths. Improve ranking from 27th overall. (based on Super Tuesday 2011 annual bike count: “busiest count sites from across the country” – Albury has an average of 0.7 riders per minute)
Increase usage of recreational bike paths by 5% (base 2010)
1.7c Available public bicycle parking locations Increase by 5% the available bike parking locations (base 2010).
1.7d Number of bike safety and promotion activities 4 per year conducted through AlburyCity Road Safety Officer Program
1.7e Bike path connectivity (minor links) Five minor connectivity improvements identified and resolved by AlburyCity
34 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
A GROWING OUTCOME 1.8 • ALBURY’S INFRASTRUCTURE AND ASSETS ARE WELL MANAGED AND MAINTAINED ECONOMY NO. STRATEGIC ACTION TIMEFRAME ORGANISATIONS RESPONSIBLE
1.8.1 Review and implement the AlburyCity Asset 2013-2017 • AlburyCity WHAT THE Management Strategy and COMMUNITY CAN DO... Asset Management Plans 2013-2015
• Consider the cost of a new asset. 1.8.2 Implement the AlburyCity Asset Ongoing • AlburyCity How will the community pay? Management Improvement Plan • Remember that not all buildings and infrastructure are Council’s 1.8.3 Undertake an inspection regime to ensure Ongoing • AlburyCity responsibility; e.g. Street lights, service levels are maintained and renewal • Business and industry traffic lights, state and regional priorities are identified. roads, vegetation in private gardens, and other businesses. 1.8.4 Determine future service levels through Ongoing • AlburyCity balancing community needs, sustainability • Report buildings in poor repair to needs, and willingness of community to pay the building owner. • Report graffiti and clean off 1.8.5 Assist community with non-AlburyCity asset Ongoing • AlburyCity straight away. enquiries through prompt referral to other organisations • Report safety issues to the organisation responsible.
OUTCOME MEASURES TARGET 2016
1.8a AlburyCity Asset Management Strategy measures Complete as scheduled by 2016
35 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
THEME 2 An Enhanced Natural Environment
This theme involves improving the health of the Murray River, being a leader in water and waste-water management and protecting local plants and animals. Key outcomes have been identified by the community and strategic actions will bring the outcomes and targets to life. Progress will be measured by working towards short and medium term targets and report results back to the Community.
36 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
AN ENHANCED NATURAL OUTCOME 2.1 • REDUCE ALBURY’S ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT ENVIRONMENT NO. STRATEGIC ACTION TIMEFRAME ORGANISATIONS RESPONSIBLE
2.1.1 Implement ‘Albury our Future’ – Annual monitoring • AlburyCity WHAT THE AlburyCity’s Sustainability Strategy. through the State • Government Agencies, incl. Dept of Lands COMMUNITY CAN DO... of Environment • OEH Monitor the performance measures set out Report • Sustainability Advisory Committee. • Attend composting and worm in the Sustainability Framework within • Murray Catchment Management Authority farms workshops ‘Albury our Future’. • Buy energy efficient light bulbs 2.1.2 Adopt an Energy Management policy and 2013 – Policy • AlburyCity • Get healthy and ride a bike or car implement action plan. 2013-2017 Action • Industry pool Plan • Federal Agencies • Harvest and use your rainwater. 2.1.3 Adopt the draft Biodiversity Strategy – on 2012-2016 • AlburyCity • Investigate alternative energy private and public lands. Implement the • Government Agencies, incl. Dept of Lands, DECCW sources adopted strategy. • Catchment Management Authority • Join a revegetation group 2.1.4 Adopt and implement the AlburyCity Waste 2012-2020 • AlburyCity • Reduce, reuse and recycle waste Management Strategy – including the • Industry desired outcomes for the Albury Waste Management Facility
2.1.5 Encourage participation by business and 2012-2016 • RDA Murray industry in the opportunities within the • AlburyCity Commonwealth’s Clean Energy Future • Industry initiatives.
37 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
AN ENHANCED NATURAL OUTCOME 2.1 • REDUCE ALBURY’S ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT ENVIRONMENT OUTCOME MEASURES TARGET 2016
2.1a AlburyCity’s Carbon Footprint Reduce total greenhouse gas emissions for AlburyCity relevant to base year of 2006
2.1b Flora and Fauna measures Net increase in native vegetation across Council managed lands.
50% increase in use of native species in AlburyCity landscaping
2.1c Waste recovery at Albury Waste Management Centre Municipal Solid Waste – 66% recovery by 2014
Commercial & Industrial – 63% recovery by 2014.
Construction & Demolition – 76% recovery by 2014.
38 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
AN ENHANCED NATURAL OUTCOME 2.2 • ALBURY IS PREPARED FOR CHANGING ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS ENVIRONMENT NO. STRATEGIC ACTION TIMEFRAME ORGANISATIONS RESPONSIBLE
2.2.1 Determine Albury’s resilience to effects of Ongoing • AlburyCity WHAT THE climate change on our social, community • Murray CMA COMMUNITY CAN DO... and environmental systems, (for example flooding, drought, water supply) and • Attend education sessions about implement an action plan. water efficient gardening • Become a volunteer with your 2.2.2 Develop and promote a range of tools to 2012-2016 • AlburyCity local environment group encourage appropriate garden design and low water use. • Become smarter in the use of water and energy 2.2.3 Develop a fire management plan for Albury 2012-2016 • RFS • Be informed – including responsible bushfire • Fire and Rescue NSW management strategies • Murray CMA • Reuse grey water on the garden • Dept of Lands • Use low phosphate or low sodium • AlburyCity detergents and washing powders • Visit AlburyCity website: – sustainability – biodiversity OUTCOME MEASURES TARGET 2016
There are no measures identified for this outcome.
39 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
AN ENHANCED NATURAL OUTCOME 2.3 • AN INCREASED AWARENESS IN SUSTAINABILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES ENVIRONMENT NO. STRATEGIC ACTION TIMEFRAME ORGANISATIONS RESPONSIBLE
2.3.1 Raise community awareness of climate Ongoing • AlburyCity WHAT THE change issues • Government Agencies, incl. Dept of Lands COMMUNITY CAN DO... • OEH • Sustainability Advisory Committee. • Buy high energy efficient • Murray Catchment Management Authority appliances • Install an energy and water 2.3.2 Promote ‘low water’ culture – (more Ongoing • AlburyCity efficient showerhead efficient use of water) • Murray Catchment Management Authority • OEH • Reduce use of heaters and air conditioners. 2.3.3 Promote awareness of sustainable building Ongoing • AlburyCity • Shorten shower time design – including ‘green-star rated’ • Government Agencies buildings • Industry • Switch off lights when not in the room 2.3.4 Promote participation in environmental Ongoing • AlburyCity • Turn off appliances at the power groups and their activities • Murray Catchment Management Authority point when not in use • Volunteer organisations
• Turn off second fridge when not in 2.3.5 Raise awareness of sustainable practices in 2012-2016 • AlburyCity use households, businesses and schools. • Sustainability Advisory Committee • Wash clothes in cold water and • Education Institutions avoid drying clothes in clothes • Industry dryers • OEH
OUTCOME MEASURES TARGET 2016
2.2a Community Awareness via AlburyCity Survey 2013: Establish base information of community awareness Improve awareness compared with base information.
2.2b Community education sessions 6 per year conducted by AlburyCity sustainability staff
40 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
THEME 3 A Caring Community
This theme involves Albury being recognised as a cultural and creative city that embraces and celebrates its diversity; provides quality health care; supports young people, promotes positive ageing; encourages healthy lifestyles; values knowledge and life-long learning and is recognised nationally as a provider of quality education. Key outcomes have been identified by the community and strategic actions will help bring the outcomes to life. Progress will be measured by working together towards short and medium term targets and results will be reported back to the Community.
41 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
A CARING OUTCOME 3.1 • ALBURY OFFERS ACCESS TO A DIVERSE RANGE OF EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES COMMUNITY NO. STRATEGIC ACTION TIMEFRAME ORGANISATIONS RESPONSIBLE
3.1.1 Provide a variety of early childhood Ongoing • Education providers WHAT THE education options –for children from birth • Dept of Education COMMUNITY CAN DO... to 12yrs. • Private Providers • AlburyCity • Businesses to promote opportunities for apprentices, 3.1.2 Provide and support families’ access to Ongoing • Dept of Education trainees and workplace training. education – those families that cannot • Non-Gov Organisations • Businesses to provide links on afford or support education for their • Community Centres website to educational and children. • Govt Agencies workplace training options. 3.1.3 Promote educational opportunities – to Ongoing • Education providers • Consider taking on an apprentice, local residents and outside the area • Dept of Education trainee, or a student for school • RDA Murray work placement. • Engage with opportunities for education and learning at any age 3.1.4 Facilitate opportunities to merge the ages Ongoing • Education providers • Use the MICEEP ‘Easy Guide’ so that young learn from old and old learn • Dept of Education • Visit the MY FUTURE website from young. • Private Providers
3.1.5 Provide innovative approaches to Ongoing • Education providers alternative and non-traditional educational • Non-Gov Organisations pathways – for less mainstream • MICEEP solutions/attitudes, more options “after •YES high school” for young people not able to or willing to go to University.
3.1.6 Improve access to a reference for vocational Ongoing • Education providers /educational choices – to help people to • Dept of Education find the educational/workplace training • *Links to Education provider websites. options available in the community. • *Links from AlburyCity website Consider links off business websites.
continued next page
42 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
A CARING OUTCOME 3.1 • ALBURY OFFERS ACCESS TO A DIVERSE RANGE OF EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES COMMUNITY NO. STRATEGIC ACTION TIMEFRAME ORGANISATIONS RESPONSIBLE
3.1.7 Provide incentives for employers – to Ongoing • Federal and State Govts engage more apprentices, and to support • Local and state Business Chambers High School & TAFE initiatives to offer the • Albury Central students school based apprenticeships and traineeships. Encourage businesses to engage apprentices and trainees.
3.1.8 Develop and implement cultural education Ongoing • AlburyCity programs (through AlburyCity Learning and • Education providers Outreach team) – eg. School excursions, children’s holiday programs, literacy and reading.
3.1.9 Encourage higher education providers to Ongoing • Higher education providers work together to enhance educational • Dept of Education opportunities that encourage children to • Education providers aspire to higher education.
OUTCOME MEASURES TARGET 2016
3.1a Participation in pre-school program An increase in percentage of children in Albury attending pre- 2011 Census 842 attending (1.76% of population) school relative to population number. 2006 Census 756 attending (1.78% of population) 2001 Census 709 attending (1.66% of population) Increase average percentage of children ‘on track’ (above 25th %ile) over the 5 developmental domains of the Australian Early Australian Early Development Index (AEDI) domains: Development Index (AEDI). A population measure of children’s – physical health and wellbeing-social competence development as they enter school. Information gathered in – emotional maturity child’s first year of full-time school – language and cognitive skills (school-based) – communication skills and general knowledge. NSW Government: Undertake a review of Bilateral Agreement (Albury: average over 5 indicators 75.3 from 2009 data on Achieving Universal access to Early Childhood Education. collection) “All children will have access by 2013” (performance benchmarks due 31/12/11, 31/12/2012 and 30/06/2013)
3.1b Student attainment and engagement A national Year 12 (or equivalent) rate for 20-24 year olds of 90 per cent by 2015 (source: Australian Govt DEEWR Youth Attainment and Transitions)
43 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
A CARING OUTCOME 3.2 • ALBURY’S KEY COMMUNITY SAFETY INDICATORS DEMONSTRATE AN IMPROVEMENT COMMUNITY NO. STRATEGIC ACTION TIMEFRAME ORGANISATIONS RESPONSIBLE
3.2.1 Implement the AlburyCity Crime Prevention 2012-2016 • AlburyCity WHAT THE Plan – including the Alcohol and other • Albury Liquor Accord COMMUNITY CAN DO... Drugs Management Plan and the Graffiti • NSW Police Management Policy • Get to know your neighbours. • If you need help, participate in 3.2.2 Work towards a safe community – security Ongoing • NSW Police alcohol & other drug management and policing. • AlburyCity programs Implement crime prevention strategies in • Neighbourhood Watch line with CPTED principles. • Community groups • Join a community group or Reward good citizenship behaviour. • Albury Liquor Accord volunteer. • Keep your doors, windows and 3.2.3 Implement the AlburyCity Road Safety 2010-2015 • AlburyCity garage locked. Strategic Plan Review 2015 • Community • Albury Police • Lock your car and ensure •RMS valuables are out of sight. • Obey the road rules and drive 3.2.4 Investigate and implement appropriate Ongoing • Dept of Justice safely. sentencing consequences and diversionary • Dept Juvenile Justice programs. • NSW Police • Report graffiti to Police. • Education Dept • Remove graffiti as soon as it • Dept of Community Services happens. • Community Centres • Youth and family Support agencies • NSW Govt
3.2.5 Support children and their families – Ongoing • State agencies through prevention of, or early intervention • Dept of Community Services into, child abuse and domestic violence
3.2.6 Educate the community in relation to cyber 2012-2016 • NSW Police crime and identity theft. • AlburyCity
3.2.7 Progress the Regional Emergency Ongoing • AlburyCity Management facilities • Other Emergency Management providers, eg. RFS, SES, NSW Ambulance, NSW Fire Brigade
44 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
A CARING OUTCOME 3.2 • ALBURY’S KEY COMMUNITY SAFETY INDICATORS DEMONSTRATE AN IMPROVEMENT COMMUNITY OUTCOME MEASURES TARGET 2016
3.2a Crime statistics for Albury LGA Achieve annual target of fewer than 300 liquor-related offences in Albury per 100,000 population. (2011 – 165)
Achieve annual target of fewer than 1000 break and enter offences in Albury per 100,000 population. (2011 – 796) Improve NSW ranking from (24) 2011
Achieve annual target of fewer than 2400 malicious damage to property offences in Albury per 100,000 population (2011 – 1125). Improve NSW ranking from (16) in 2011
Achieve annual target of fewer than 800 assault (non-domestic violence) offences in Albury per 100,000 population. (2011 – 667) (source: BOCSAR)
3.2b Road trauma statistics Achieve a 1% reduction in the total number of road crashes in Albury per 1000 population.
3.2c NSW 2021 – Child wellbeing Reduced rate of children and young people reported at risk of significant harm by 1.5% per year. (source NSW 2021 State Plan)
45 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
A CARING OUTCOME 3.3 • THE HEALTH OF THE ALBURY COMMUNITY IMPROVES (INCLUDING ACCESS TO APPROPRIATE SERVICES) COMMUNITY NO. STRATEGIC ACTION TIMEFRAME ORGANISATIONS RESPONSIBLE
3.3.1 Immunisation – ensure the future health of Ongoing • AlburyCity WHAT THE the community is maintained with • General practitioners COMMUNITY CAN DO... accessible immunisation programs. • Albury Wodonga Health • Murrumbidgee Local Health District • Ask someone “Are you OK?” • Do not smoke. 3.3.2 Mental Health Services – ensure Ongoing • Hume Medicare Local appropriate provision of, and access to, • Govt Agencies • Get involved in your community mental health services. • Murrumbidgee Local Health District • Have your children immunised. • Non-Gov Organisations Support the improvement of youth mental • MICEEP • Know your blood pressure, health; implement the outcomes cholesterol, and blood sugar determined through the October 2012 levels. Monitor changes. Mental Health Forum • Maintain a healthy weight. 3.3.3 Homelessness – investigate the extent of • State Agencies • Undertake regular exercise. the issues and underlying causes, consider • Open Family • Visit the Black Dog Institute projects to address issues. • RDA Murray website •YES Continued implementation of Riverina 2009-2014 • St Vincent de Paul • Visit your GP for health checks. Murray NSW Homelessness Action Plan
3.3.4 Increase the existing footpath network to Ongoing • AlburyCity facilitate walking for health.
3.3.5 Implement healthy lifestyle programs – to Ongoing • Murrumbidgee Local Health District improve the health of the community. • Albury Community Health • Albury Wodonga Health
3.3.6 Provide support to the community to Ongoing • Not for profit organisations increase positive social outcomes • Church and spiritual groups and their affiliated organisations. • Service Clubs • Sporting Groups
46 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
A CARING OUTCOME 3.3 • THE HEALTH OF THE ALBURY COMMUNITY IMPROVES (INCLUDING ACCESS TO APPROPRIATE SERVICES) COMMUNITY OUTCOME MEASURES TARGET 2016
3.3a National measures for: Decrease cardiovascular disease deaths in Albury per 100,000 – Heart disease, Chronic illness associated with a lack of population – 2005/2006 average 246.2 healthy lifestyle and Diabetes-related deaths in NSW to fall below 30 per 100,000 population
Number of cancer deaths per cancer notified continue to fall. (source: NSW Gov Greater Southern Area Health Service- Public Health)
– Mental Health 70% of mental health clients are followed up within 7 days of discharge (source: Murrumbidgee Local Health District- Mental health, Drug and Alcohol)
3.3b Immunisation rates compared with State benchmarks Albury to be at or above the 90% state benchmark for children recorded as fully immunised in 3 categories: 12-<15 months; 24-<27 months; 60-<63 months
3.3c Homelessness data for NSW and Riverina Murray A reduction of 7% in the overall level of homelessness in NSW by 2013 (source: NSW 2021 & NSW Homelessness Action Plan).
The rate of homelessness in Riverina Murray in 2006 was 48 Reduce the rate of homelessness in Riverina Murray to under per 10,000 persons compared with 42 per 10,000 persons the NSW rate (per 10,000 persons). for NSW as a whole – (2006 Census).
3.3d Healthy Lifestyle Programs Implemented as scheduled – (Murrumbidgee Local Health District) Eg. Healthy children’s initiatives and Falls Prevention Program
47 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
A CARING OUTCOME 3.4 • ALBURY OFFERS A DIVERSE RANGE OF FACILITIES AND ACTIVITIES FOR ALL AGES COMMUNITY NO. STRATEGIC ACTION TIMEFRAME ORGANISATIONS RESPONSIBLE
3.4.1 Improve access for all – in relation to Ongoing • AlburyCity WHAT THE transportation, civic buildings, community • Businesses COMMUNITY CAN DO... facilities and parks. • State agencies • Transport providers • Be active • Read the AlburyWodonga Official 3.4.2 Promote, advocate and provide facilities Ongoing • Age Concern Visitors guide. and activities for an older population • U3A • AlburyCity • Report access difficulties to Develop a directory of programs and 2013 • Community Centres AlburyCity or other organisation services • NSW Govt: Ageing Disability & Homecare responsible. • State Agencies • Visit the Albury Botanic Gardens 3.4.3 Promote and encourage healthy lifestyles Ongoing • AlburyCity • Visit the Disability Advocacy and through development and efficient use of • Health agencies Information Service website: infrastructure. • Dept Sport and Recreation • Visit the LibraryMuseum or Art – Recreational/sporting • Schools Gallery – Leisure • Leisure / Social Group – Facility Master Plans • Sporting Groups • Visit ‘What’s On’ on the AlburyCity – Multi-purpose courts website. – Sports Field Improvement Plan
3.4.4 Increase activities available for people with Ongoing • Vision Australia a disability – through improved access and • Aspire NSW promotion • The Centre (Vic) • Community Options Brokerage service (Vic) Develop a directory of programs and 2013 • NSW Govt: Ageing Disability & Homecare services • Albury Access Committee • AlburyCity
3.4.5 Increase and promote activities and Ongoing • AlburyCity infrastructure available for young people – • Community Centres using all social media types.
3.4.6 Implement priority actions within 2012-2016 • AlburyCity AlburyCity Social Plan and AlburyCity • Cultural Industry Cultural Plan • State agencies
continued next page
48 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
A CARING OUTCOME 3.4 • ALBURY OFFERS A DIVERSE RANGE OF FACILITIES AND ACTIVITIES FOR ALL AGES COMMUNITY NO. STRATEGIC ACTION TIMEFRAME ORGANISATIONS RESPONSIBLE
3.4.7 Provide high quality open space –to 2010-2014 and • AlburyCity support a growing population – through ongoing Open Space Master Plan
3.4.8 Promote and enhance QEII square as an Ongoing • AlburyCity open space and cultural hub – to provide a community heart.
3.4.9 Enhance access to the Murray River and Ongoing • AlburyCity develop experiences for the community – • State Agencies through Murray River Experience Master • Tourism businesses Plan.
3.4.10 Improve reserves and access to the Lake Ongoing • AlburyCity Hume shoreline – through Murray River • Goulburn Murray Water Experience Master Plan. • Lake Hume Community Reference group • Murray Darling Basin Authority • Murray Darling Association • Govt Agencies
3.4.11 Improve infrastructure and outdoor space 2012-2016 • AlburyCity at child facilities and Community Centres.
3.4.12 Continue to implement actions from 2012-2016 • AlburyCity Botanic Gardens Conservation Management Plans
49 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
A CARING OUTCOME 3.4 • ALBURY OFFERS A DIVERSE RANGE OF FACILITIES AND ACTIVITIES FOR ALL AGES COMMUNITY OUTCOME MEASURES TARGET 2016
3.4a Customer satisfaction with the range of facilities and Improve community satisfaction compared with 2006. activities available
3.4b Map progress of Facility Access Database Works progressed within database; new works added as required
3.4c Murray River Experience Master Plan priorities Report on priorities implemented
3.4d Botanic Gardens Conservation Management Plan Actions Report on actions implemented
3.4e AlburyCity Recreational Infrastructure Increase on base amount available in 2012.
3.4f Sport and Recreation Participation Rates Increase sport and recreation participation rates at AlburyCity facilities by 2% (2010-2011: 1,072,129)
50 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
A CARING OUTCOME 3.5 • IMPROVED HEALTH, EMPLOYMENT AND EDUCATION FOR ABORIGINAL* PEOPLE IN ALBURY COMMUNITY NO. STRATEGIC ACTION TIMEFRAME ORGANISATIONS RESPONSIBLE
3.5.1 Provide opportunity – for the general Ongoing • Aboriginal Community WHAT THE community to participate and experience • Community Working Party (CWP) COMMUNITY CAN DO... Aboriginal culture. • Hume Medicare Local Eg. Naidoc; Bundyi; Gyndamana; • AlburyCity • Actively seek opportunities to Talkback Wiradjuri; Blackborder theatre. gain knowledge. • Attend a Community Working 3.5.2 Map the current Aboriginal facilities in Ongoing • Aboriginal Community Party meeting. Albury and implement strategies to • CWP promote these. • Woomera • Attend and participate in Including: Wonga Wetlands; Buraja; Koori • Albury Wodonga Aboriginal Health Service Aboriginal cultural activities. Kindermana; Albury Wodonga Aboriginal • AlburyCity • Be active within community Health Service. programs 3.5.3 Consult and engage with the local Ongoing • AlburyCity • Empower yourself to improve your Aboriginal community on changes that will • Government agencies knowledge and health. affect them. • Talk to an Aboriginal Elder or person about their culture. 3.5.4 Continue to implement AlburyCity 2010-2015 • AlburyCity Aboriginal Employment Strategy • Provide feedback to AlburyCity about events and programs. 3.5.5 Implement priorities – from CWP survey and Ongoing • CWP • Visit AlburyWodonga Aboriginal ‘Closing the Gap’ Forum. • AlburyCity Events Facebook page. • Aboriginal Community • Woomera • State Agencies
3.5.6 NSW 2021 – Implement the “Build and 2010-2020 • State agencies Grow Aboriginal Community Housing” • Dept of Education and Communities Strategy – Goal 26 priority action.
3.5.7 Support access and develop the Ongoing • AlburyCity preservation of AlburyCity cultural • City of Wodonga collections
*Includes Torres Strait Islander people
51 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
A CARING OUTCOME 3.5 • IMPROVED HEALTH, EMPLOYMENT AND EDUCATION FOR ABORIGINAL* PEOPLE IN ALBURY COMMUNITY OUTCOME MEASURES TARGET 2016
3.5a Community Working Party measures (from CWP survey Identify and prioritise actions. action plan).
‘Closing the Gap’ priorities Report on implementation progress by 2016
3.5b State Plan – NSW 2021 targets: Goal 26. “The NSW Government is committed to meeting the national – Close the life expectancy gap within a generation. target of reducing the life expectancy gap for Aboriginal people by 2036” (source pg 49 NSW 2021)
– Support Aboriginal culture, country and identity “Increase the number of Aboriginal culturally significant objects and places protected” (source pg 50 NSW 2021).
52 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
A CARING OUTCOME 3.6 • IMPROVED SETTLEMENT OF PEOPLE FROM DIVERSE CULTURES COMMUNITY NO. STRATEGIC ACTION TIMEFRAME ORGANISATIONS RESPONSIBLE
3.6.1 Welcome people from a variety of cultural 2012 – 2016 and • Volunteer Resource Bureau WHAT THE backgrounds to Albury and the region. ongoing • AlburyCity COMMUNITY CAN DO... Provide information pack and support. • Murray Now • State and Federal Agencies • Consider a skilled migrant Support the NSW Government’s – NSW • Community Groups position within your organisation. Strategy for Business Migration & • Advisory Groups • Consider a work experience Attracting International Students. • Community Relations Commission opportunity for a skilled migrant • Businesses or refugee within your organisation. 3.6.2 Encourage cultural expression. 2012 – 2016 and • Volunteer Resource Bureau Consider activities to allow cultural ongoing • AlburyCity • Hold a neighbourhood BBQ. expression on a variety of levels. Eg. • Community Groups • Participate in cultural events and Harmony Day, Shopping centres, activities. Community street BBQs, Library/Museum cultural activities. • Respect the culture of others. • Welcome your neighbours. 3.6.3 Connect skilled migrants to appropriate 2012 – 2016 and • Volunteer Resource Bureau employment pathways and networks. ongoing • Businesses • RDA Murray
3.6.4 Encourage large businesses / industry to 2012 – 2016 and • Volunteer Resource Bureau explore skilled migrant and refugee options. ongoing • Businesses
3.6.5 Promote the value of multiculturalism in the 2012 – 2016 and • Volunteer Resource Bureau community. ongoing • AlburyCity • State and Federal Agencies • Community Groups • Advisory Groups • Community Relations Commission
3.6.6 Continue to provide education and training 2012 – 2016 and • Albury and Wodonga TAFE opportunities to improve skills, education ongoing • Albury / Wodonga Community College and job opportunities. • Universities • Businesses
3.6.7 Agencies to provide and/or improve 2012 – 2016 and • Centrelink interpreting services ongoing • Health Services; Specialists • Job Services Australia • AlburyCity
53 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
A CARING OUTCOME 3.6 • IMPROVED SETTLEMENT OF PEOPLE FROM DIVERSE CULTURES COMMUNITY OUTCOME MEASURES TARGET 2016
3.6a Percentage of skilled migrants coming to the region. Increase percentage of skilled migrants coming to Riverina / Albury compared with year previous. (Regional settlement outside capital cities – 1996: 1% 2004: 5% 2010: 13%. Source: Volunteer Resource Bureau and Dept. Immigration & Citizenship – DIAC)
(07-2007 to 03-2012 total migrants as either skilled Increase in total number of migrants moving to migrants, family visas or refugees – 1319. Albury / Wodonga. Source: Volunteer Resource Bureau and DIAC)
3.6b Skill shortages are matched to skilled migrant programs. Regional programs that help supply the skill needs of regional employers are provided and promoted.
3.6c Services have appropriate translation services Raise awareness amongst services and organisations as to the Government Translating and Interpreting Services (TIS National) available.
100% of AlburyCity Customer Service staff are aware of TIS National.
Organisations continue to liaise with the Albury/Wodonga Volunteer Resource Bureau – regarding settlement services.
3.6d Community education programs that assist with Continue to foster cultural celebrations amongst newly arrived understanding the value of cultural diversity. community members.
Cultural celebrations held annually.
Newly arrived community members develop their own community organisation and participate in at least one cultural event annually.
54 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
A CARING OUTCOME 3.7 • INCREASED PARTICIPATION IN A DIVERSE RANGE OF ART & CULTURAL ACTIVITIES IN ALBURY COMMUNITY NO. STRATEGIC ACTION TIMEFRAME ORGANISATIONS RESPONSIBLE
3.7.1 Review and implement the Cultural Precinct 2012-2016 • AlburyCity WHAT THE Master Plan COMMUNITY CAN DO... 3.7.2 Increase community arts facilities – 2012-2015 • AlburyCity • Enjoy the theatre. through Art Gallery re-development • Nominate to receive the AlburyCity monthly e-newsletter 3.7.3 Provide a diverse range of entertainment 2012-2016 • AlburyCity experiences at Albury Entertainment Centre • Participate in a bake at the wood – Ensure entertainment facilities are of fired oven. industry standard and meet community • Participate in cultural events and expectations activities. 3.7.4 Identify economic impact of cultural 2012-2016 • AlburyCity • Read “what’s on” in the industry – Implement economically • Cultural organisations newspaper, or visit the AlburyCity sustainable cultural initiatives •Artists website for event information. • Cultural industry professionals • Visit the library, museum or art gallery 3.7.5 Provide high quality library facilities and 2012-2016 • AlburyCity services
3.7.6 Adopt best practice for management of 2012-2016 • AlburyCity built, natural and cultural heritage – Protect items of heritage significance
3.7.7 Encourage, support and foster cultural 2012-2016 • AlburyCity organisations. • Murray Arts • Murray Conservatorium • Hot House Theatre • Flying Fruit Fly Circus • AlburyCity Band • Albury Wodonga Eisteddfod
55 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
A CARING OUTCOME 3.7 • INCREASED PARTICIPATION IN A DIVERSE RANGE OF ART & CULTURAL ACTIVITIES IN ALBURY COMMUNITY OUTCOME MEASURES TARGET 2016
3.7a $ spend on cultural activity Increase dollar spend on cultural activities in Albury compared with previous years
3.7b Passive and active cultural participation rates for Art Gallery: A 2% increase in participation rate compared with AlburyCity facilities and services 2012 figures.
Library Museum: A 2% increase in participation rate compared with 2012 figures; 2% increase in number of items loaned.
Lavington Library: Maintain consistent attendance at approximately 96,000 visitors compared with 2012 figures; 2% increase in number of items loaned (2,000 loans)
Albury Entertainment Centre: A 2% increase (1,100 visitors) in participation rate compared with 2012 figures.
Wood Fired Oven: Maintain current level of service by offering 28 free bakes per year. Increase private bookings by 10% (from 86)
AlburyCity Collections: A 10% increase of collection catalogued; Development, documentation and preservation of the cultural collections
continued next page
56 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
A CARING OUTCOME 3.7 • INCREASED PARTICIPATION IN A DIVERSE RANGE OF ART & CULTURAL ACTIVITIES IN ALBURY COMMUNITY OUTCOME MEASURES TARGET 2016
3.7c Cultural programs developed from within our community in Theatre: 5 events/partnerships in annual subscription season the fields of theatre, fine art, social history, literature and with Australian signature companies; Maintain level of cultural development community, state, national and international programming; Remain accessible for community access.
Visual Arts: 50% of exhibitions generated in house; at least one public program per exhibition; develop an exhibition program to showcase emerging artists; 15 artists engaged per annum to develop new work; 4 public art projects delivered
Social History: 50% of exhibitions generated in house; at least one public program per exhibition; develop an exhibition program to showcase emerging artists; 15 artists engaged per annum to develop new work.
Library & Information programs: 2% increase in number of bookings for technology; 2% increase in number of public enquiry responses; 2% increase in number of hits on Website
Cultural Development: At least 6 projects delivered per annum; At least 12 community groups actively engaged in projects per annum; Annual Community and Cultural Grants program delivered.
Publications: 2 self initiated collection based publications annually
Volunteer engagement: 5% increase in volunteer placements within Cultural Services
57 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
THEME 4 A Leading Community
This theme involves establishing strong government and regional networks, empowering the community to contribute to the future direction of the city and providing inclusive decision making processes. Key outcomes have been identified by the community and strategic actions will bring the outcomes to life. Progress will be measured by working together towards short and medium term targets and reporting results back to the community.
58 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
A LEADING OUTCOME 4.1 • THE COMMUNITY IS CONSULTED ON ALL MAJOR CHANGES THAT WILL AFFECT THEM COMMUNITY NO. STRATEGIC ACTION TIMEFRAME ORGANISATIONS RESPONSIBLE
4.1.1 Continue to develop and implement 2012-2017 • State and federal agencies WHAT THE Community Engagement Plans –to engage • AlburyCity COMMUNITY CAN DO... the community on issues that affect them. • Businesses • Community Groups • Ask questions. • Attend Council meetings. 4.1.2 Evaluate effectiveness of Community 2012-2016 • State and federal agencies Engagement Plans – modify approach as • AlburyCity • Consult other Agency websites. required. • Businesses • Join the AlburyCity Focus Group • Community Groups
• Provide feedback on AlburyCity 4.1.3 Use new technologies for engagement and Ongoing • State and federal agencies public exhibitions of policies, promotion where appropriate – including • AlburyCity strategies, plans and community on-line engagement and social networking. • Businesses projects. • Community Groups • Read ‘Accent on Albury’ and keep up to date with Council activities • Talk to your Councillors about ideas for improving Albury OUTCOME MEASURES TARGET 2016 Council. • Visit 4.1a Community satisfaction with opportunities to be informed Over 70% of community surveyed through the Albury alburycity.nsw.gov.au/haveasay and heard on changes that affect them. Community Satisfaction Survey are satisfied with opportunities to be informed and heard.
100% of AlburyCity major community engagement activities are evaluated to determine customer satisfaction.
4.1b Community Engagement Plans developed Number reported annually in Annual Report
59 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
A LEADING OUTCOME 4.2 • REGIONAL ISSUES ARE ADDRESSED THROUGH AN INTEGRATED APPROACH COMMUNITY NO. STRATEGIC ACTION TIMEFRAME ORGANISATIONS RESPONSIBLE
4.2.1 Continue to lobby regarding cross border Ongoing • Chief Executive Officers Cross border Forum WHAT THE anomalies – maintain communication • NSW and Victorian State Governments. COMMUNITY CAN DO... through NSW Cross Border Commissioner • AlburyCity
• Attend Regional Forums to be 4.2.2 Conduct regional forums throughout the 2010-2015 • RDA Murray – Regional Plan informed of activities and Murray region to promote the activities of priorities for the region. RDA Murray and its Regional Plan, priorities • Business to business networking. and actions.
• Consider regional or cross border 4.2.3 Continue Regional Forums – to enhance Ongoing • ACSUM opportunities within your cross border co-operation, recognise growth • RAMROC workplace. opportunities and to foster consistency and • Lobby your local member for better use of resources. change. 4.2.4 Encourage regional connections, Ongoing • AlburyCity collaborations and partnerships within the • Cultural Organisations cultural industry.
OUTCOME MEASURES TARGET 2016
4.2a Number of joint representations made to other levels of Maintain collaborative arrangements between cross border, government. and regional councils and interest groups.
Report on joint representations monthly
60 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
A LEADING OUTCOME 4.3 • THE ALBURY COMMUNITY PROVIDES RESOURCES AND OPPORTUNITIES TO COMMUNITY DEVELOP FUTURE LEADERS
NO. STRATEGIC ACTION TIMEFRAME ORGANISATIONS RESPONSIBLE WHAT THE 4.3.1 Develop a schools program – to develop Ongoing • Dept of Education COMMUNITY CAN DO... quality leaders of the future. • Education providers • As a young person, have your say. 4.3.2 Consider the views and needs of young Ongoing • Education providers • Attend and contribute to a people – develop strategies to allow young • AlburyCity Youth Forum. people to contribute to the City’s future. • Join a local community organisation – contribute to your 4.3.3 Community Leadership – provide 2012-2016 • Dept of Education community. opportunities and training programs for • Education providers developing future community leaders. • AlburyCity • Join the AlburyCity Youth Council. • Business networks • Offer professional development opportunities within your 4.3.4 Advocate and support training Ongoing • AlburyCity organisation. opportunities for the cultural sector • State and federal agencies • Professional cultural sector • Organisations and community groups proactively support 4.3.5 Lead tailored ‘capacity building’ programs 2010-2015 • RDA Murray – Regional Plan community leadership programs. for delivery to LGAs and community groups to promote regional development. Bring together leaders from businesses.
4.3.6 Facilitate volunteering opportunities and Ongoing • AlburyCity information about volunteering to the • User groups community. • Volunteer Resource Bureau – Cultural • NSW Dept Sport and Recreation – Sporting • Govt Agencies – Environmental • Local businesses – Community
4.3.7 Showcase our sporting, academic, cultural Ongoing • AlburyCity and business leaders • Education providers • Cultural sector • Businesses • Chambers of Commerce
61 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
A LEADING OUTCOME 4.3 • THE ALBURY COMMUNITY PROVIDES RESOURCES AND OPPORTUNITIES TO COMMUNITY DEVELOP FUTURE LEADERS
OUTCOME MEASURES TARGET 2016
4.3a Professional development opportunities provided by 100% of AlburyCity employees offered professional employers. development through skill set development.
100% of AlburyCity staff requiring Compliance Training complete the training prior to the expiration of qualification currency
100% of AlburyCity supervisors are offered opportunities to complete qualifications in Management.
4.3b Leadership development workshops and training programs. Report on:
Albury Youth Council workshops
Albury Northside Chamber of Commerce leadership and development programs.
RDA Murray initiatives to develop and mentor community leaders
4.3c AlburyCity Trainee program AlburyCity trainees at 10% of AlburyCity workforce
62 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
A LEADING OUTCOME 4.4 • THE COMMUNITY ARE INFORMED ON PROGRESS AGAINST THE COMMUNITY STRATEGIC COMMUNITY PLAN AND THE IMPACT OF THE STRATEGIC ACTIONS
NO. STRATEGIC ACTION TIMEFRAME ORGANISATIONS RESPONSIBLE WHAT THE 4.4.1 Review the Community Strategic Plan every 2016 • AlburyCity COMMUNITY CAN DO... four years in line with local government • Join the AlburyCity Focus Group. elections.
• Make use of Council’s website. 4.4.2 Develop a community engagement strategy February 2016 • AlburyCity • Participate in community surveys. to consult with the community as part of the four yearly review. • Read ‘Accent on Albury’ and keep up to date with Council activities. 4.4.3 Prepare and present an End of Term report August 2016 • AlburyCity to the outgoing Council. Make available on AlburyCity website.
4.4.4 Use range of communication mediums to Ongoing • Gov agencies inform the community of community plan • Businesses progress, including the Annual Report. • AlburyCity
4.4.5 NSW 2021 – ensure initiatives give regard to Ongoing • Gov agencies state plan. • Businesses • AlburyCity
OUTCOME MEASURES TARGET 2016
4.4a Consultation with AlburyCity staff other agencies / All targets within Albury 2030 are reported as either achieved stakeholders undertaken or not achieved (where information available).
4.3c Community Strategic Plan activities and targets. Complete review and report on targets and activities identified within Albury 2030 by the final outgoing meeting of Council.
63 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
A LEADING OUTCOME 4.5 • ALBURY COUNCIL WILL PLAN AND LEAD WITH GOOD GOVERNANCE COMMUNITY NO. STRATEGIC ACTION TIMEFRAME ORGANISATIONS RESPONSIBLE
4.5.1 Implement actions identified in the 2010-2014 • AlburyCity WHAT THE AlburyCity Corporate Plan COMMUNITY CAN DO... Review Corporate Plan
• Attend Council meetings. 4.5.2 Implement actions within the AlburyCity Ongoing • AlburyCity • Ask questions. Risk Management Action plans.
• Become familiar with Council 4.5.3 Undertake programs to monitor and Ongoing • AlburyCity processes. improve customer service. • Provide constructive suggestions. 4.5.4 Prepare for and support local government 2016 and ongoing • AlburyCity elections every four years.
4.5.5 Support Local Councillors Ongoing • AlburyCity
4.5.6 Undertake staff well being initiatives – as Ongoing • AlburyCity part of the Work Health and Safety Manual
4.5.7 Review Workforce Management Strategy 2013 • AlburyCity
4.5.8 Ensure technical resources and Ongoing • AlburyCity infrastructure are current and maintained
OUTCOME MEASURES TARGET 2016
4.5a AlburyCity Corporate Plan measures. Completed and reviewed in 2013-2014
4.5b AlburyCity Risk Management Action Plan measures. Risk Management Action Plan priorities
4.5c Staff Climate Survey priorities from action plan. Conduct survey in 2013, prepare action plan and implement priorities. Report on progress in 2016.
64 LPAGE | CLOSE | CONTENTS | PRINT | PAGE R
ALBURYCITY 553 Kiewa Street Albury NSW 2640 PO Box 323, Albury NSW 2640 P: (02) 60 238 111 F: (02) 60 238 190 E: [email protected] W: www.alburycity.nsw.gov.au
65
ATTACHMENT TO CM 9E – 02/2013
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT POLICY AND PROCEDURE
ATTACHMENT 1 – 9E
Draft Community Engagement Policy
POLICY NAME Community Engagement - DRAFT DIRECTORATE Corporate Services
PURPOSE
AlburyCity is committed to informing the community about Council decisions, and engaging with residents during the development of plans, policies and projects that have the potential to affect the Albury community. Community engagement will be undertaken in a planned manner.
The purpose of community engagement is to work with identified groups of people or individuals that may be affected by a particular decision or activity. The engagement process works collaboratively to identify and consider issues affecting the individuals or groups before decisions are made.
Community engagement ranges from informing the public (e.g. sending letters to residents affected by road works in their street) through to involving people in establishing local priorities (e.g. Albury 2030).
SCOPE
The Community Engagement Policy is to be read in conjunction with the Community Engagement Procedure.
Directors and Group/Team Leaders are to ensure all strategic planning and major projects, programs and new initiatives are assessed using the Community Engagement Procedure to determine the level of community engagement required.
This process is to be used when planning the year’s works program, service programs and exhibition scheduling. This is to be undertaken for less significant projects where risks are identified and/or where there is a requirement to assess and understand community needs.
CONTENT
The Community Engagement Policy establishes the importance of community consultation and identifies relevant reference documentation.
Community engagement is also referred to as ‘public participation’.
Definitions:
IAP2 International Association of Public Participation
‘Public participation’ means to involve those who are affected by a decision in the decision-making process. It promotes sustainable decisions by providing participants with the information they need to be involved in a meaningful way, and it communicates to participants how their input affects the decision (source: IAP2 - Australasia).
AlburyCity – Draft Community Engagement Policy - 2013 Page 1 of 2
DOCUMENTATION
The Community Engagement Policy is to be read in conjunction with the Community Engagement Procedure, and is based on IAP2 guidelines.
AUTHORISATION
Status Committee Manex 12 February 2013 Council Owner Corporate Services – Corporate Planner Compliance Mandatory History Register This policy is to be included in the Public Policy Register. Last issued Review TRIM REFERENCE DOC13/12415
AlburyCity – Draft Community Engagement Policy - 2013 Page 2 of 2
ATTACHMENT 2 – 9E
Draft Community Engagement Procedure
PROCEDURE NAME Community Engagement - DRAFT DIRECTORATE Corporate Services
PURPOSE
The Community Engagement Procedure is to support the Community Engagement Policy and provide step by step direction to determine the level and type of community engagement to be undertaken by AlburyCity staff.
SCOPE
The Procedure applies to all Council staff. Directors and Group/Team Leaders are to ensure all strategic planning and major projects, programs and new initiatives are assessed using the procedure to determine whether community engagement is required.
The Community Engagement Procedure should be used for: planning the year’s works program, significant projects, service programs or service reviews, reviews of policies, procedures and strategies, exhibition scheduling, or less significant projects where risks are identified and community needs must be understood.
Community engagement may also be referred to as public participation.
DEFINITIONS
IAP2 International Association of Public Participation
‘Public participation’ means to involve those who are affected by a decision in the decision-making process. It promotes sustainable decisions by providing participants with the information they need to be involved in a meaningful way, and it communicates to participants how their input affects the decision (source: IAP2 - Australasia).
REFERENCES
The Community Engagement Procedure is to be read in conjunction with the Community Engagement Policy, and is based on IAP2 guidelines.
IAP2 Guidelines (adapted from IAP2 training manuals) IAP2 Template suite (adapted from IAP2 training manuals and available on AlburyCity staff intranet) IAP2 Training manuals For more information on IAP2 visit the IAP2 website
AlburyCity- Draft Community Engagement Procedure - 2013 Page 1 of 6 ACTIVITY
Step 1
Please list all of the individuals and groups potentially affected by this project / program (i.e. the stakeholders). Consider each of these stakeholders as you answer the questions in Step 2.
Step 2
Please answer the following questions and add up the total score.
TITLE OF PROJECT:
Please indicate either 1 – 5 from the scale below:
1 2 3 4 5 Not applicable to No I don’t know Maybe Yes my project
Question Response Comment from scale 1 Do you need to understand the community’s needs and / or ideas? 2 Does the project / program have the potential If yes, how? to impact on Council’s reputation, positively or negatively? 3 Is there a potential for community interest?
4 Has this issue / project been controversial in If yes, how? the past? 5 Does this issue or physical location have a If yes, what history? history or sensitivity?
6 Is there a likelihood of a particular group being If yes, name group(s) interested in the matter?
7 Is there a potential impact on vulnerable or If yes, what is this impact? minority groups?
8 Is there a regulatory requirement for If yes, which legislation and community engagement on this matter? sections?
9 Does the project / program have potential If yes, estimate the $$$ financial implications that may impact on impact. stakeholders?
AlburyCity- Draft Community Engagement Procedure - 2013 Page 2 of 6 10 Does the project / program have potential If yes, estimate the $$$ financial implications that may impact on impact. Council? 11 Is there potential disruption for stakeholders?
12 Is there potential for stakeholders to perceive that they will be disadvantaged by this project/initiative? 13 Will stakeholders have additional obligations /responsibilities as a result of this project/initiative? 14 Is there political interest at local, state or federal level? 15 Has there been media or community interest in the past 5 years? (you may need to check with the Communications Team) 16 Is there a key motivational driver for this If yes, please name project?
TOTAL Note: Does the project meet the criteria for a Division If yes, the DLG requires evidence of of Local Government (DLG) Capital Expenditure community engagement, regardless of review? (cost is > 10% of annual rates revenue) score above.
Step 3
Discuss your responses with an IAP2 trained staff member to determine whether community engagement may be required, and if so, the level of engagement necessary (as identified through the IAP2 Spectrum of Public Participation located at the end of this document).
SCORE ACTION <40 Consider any questions that scored a ‘5’, and assess level of engagement required, (consult IAP2 Spectrum of Public Participation). Present your responses to Step 1, 2 and 3 to your Group/Team Leader and Director for sign off, action and / or filing in TRIM. 40-50 Community engagement may be required. Consider any questions that scored a ‘5’, and assess level of engagement required, (consult IAP2 Spectrum of Public Participation). Discuss with IAP2 trained staff member to determine engagement type. 50+ Community engagement is required. Discuss with IAP2 trained staff member to determine engagement type. Provide this recommendation to your Group/Team Leader for approval, and advise the Director.
Use Community Engagement template on the staff intranet to develop your plan.
AlburyCity- Draft Community Engagement Procedure - 2013 Page 3 of 6 The current IAP2 trained staff members are:
David Armstrong Kate de Hennin Chris Graham Warren Jenkinson Tracey Squire
Rebecca Bates Matthew Dudley Melinda Grigg Michael Keys Steven Swann
Judy Charlton Donna Evans Jacqui Hemsley Andrew Lawson Maralee Vogel
David Christy Brad Ferris James Jenkins John Mulvey
Step 4
Prepare a draft community engagement plan with the support of a trained IAP2 officer. A community engagement plan may consist of a documented action list or a plan using the IAP2 template suite.
The templates or action list can be tailored by each Group/Team for a particular situation (for instance, a standard approach may be designed for recurrent tasks on the works program). Check with your Group/Team Leader whether they already have a template for you to complete.
Draft community engagement plans must include a budget and have been reviewed by the Communications Team.
Step 5
The final community engagement plan is to be signed off by the relevant Director and saved into TRIM. The Director is to determine if the plan is to go to Manex and the Council. Use the ‘Have a Say’ page as one of the consultation techniques.
If the plan is adopted by Council, place on the ‘Have a Say’ page on AlburyCity’s website.
Step 6
If a significant change in strategy or budget occurs, a revised community engagement plan may be required.
Step 7
Community engagement activities undertaken must be evaluated. This is best completed directly after the consultation has been undertaken. A template survey form is available on the intranet and can be modified to suit any engagement type.
AlburyCity- Draft Community Engagement Procedure - 2013 Page 4 of 6 DOCUMENTATION
IAP2 Spectrum of Public Participation (adapted from the IAP2 training manuals)
Each community engagement plan will determine where on the spectrum the engagement is to occur for each stage of the process. Inform Consult Involve Collaborate Empower
Public To provide the To obtain public To work directly To partner with To place final participation public with feedback on with the public the public in each decision-making type balanced and analysis, throughout the aspect of the in the hands of objective alternatives and/or process to decision including the public information to decisions ensure that the development assist them in public concerns of alternatives understanding and aspirations and the the problem, are consistently identification of alternatives, understood and the preferred opportunities considered solution and/or solutions
Promise to the We will keep We will keep you We will work We will look to We will public you informed informed, listen to with you to you for advice implement what and acknowledge ensure that your and innovation in you decide concerns and concerns and formulating aspirations, and aspirations are solutions and provide feedback directly reflected incorporate your on how public input in the advice and influenced the alternatives recommendations decision developed and into the decisions provide to the maximum feedback on extent possible how public input influenced the decision
Example Fact sheets Invite public Workshops Citizen Delegated techniques for Web site comment Community Advisory Decision the Open house Focus groups needs Committees Local engagement Public Surveys analysis Participatory Governmen with the notice Public meetings Strategic decision- t elections community Exhibition Community questioning making A story in information and Accent feedback Email sessions updates to subscribers
AlburyCity- Draft Community Engagement Procedure - 2013 Page 5 of 6 AUTHORISATION
Status Committee Manex 12 February 2013 Council Owner Corporate Services – Corporate Planner Compliance Mandatory History Last endorsed by Manex February 2011 Register This procedure is to be included in the Public Policy Register. Last issued Review TRIM REFERENCE FIL10/00539 DOC13/12416
AlburyCity- Draft Community Engagement Procedure - 2013 Page 6 of 6
ATTACHMENT TO CM 9F – 02/2013
RESULTS OF CONSULTATION FOR DRAFT ALBURY – A DOG FRIENDLY CITY
ATTACHMENT 1 – 9F
Community Engagement – Summary Table of Comments Received
Attachment 1 - Community Engagement - Summary table of comments received
RESIDENT SUMMARY OF ISSUES General NSW Government Health – Strong support for the strategy Murrumbidgee Local Health Upgrading of five existing off leash areas by providing drinking water, District seating shade, bag dispensers and bins Developing Logan Road off leash area as a regional Off leash Park Linking off leash areas with pathways/trails Strongly urge the inclusion of public toilets in all areas Include off leash areas on trails map and well communicate the links to encourage the use of these areas and physical activity Mungabareena Reserve Ray Williams Off leash area should be away from such a beautiful area. Lack of patrols leads to unauthorised use of the area by dog owners The area should be contained (fenced) so that dogs are not allowed to be uncontrolled Ideally the area should be well away from the river Tracy Michael Supportive of site Anna Kaye Support more off leash areas particularly pleasant “people - friendly” surrounds as they are more likely to be used Mungabareena is prime example however a fair amount of beautification is required Live close to Alexandra Park however would prefer Mungabareena Reserve
Lyn Tymczuk In favour of this site The site chosen at Mungabareena Reserve is dangerous the current is too strong here, banks are too steep and water entry is limited by trees Perhaps an area downstream near Doctors Point entry (just up from boat ramp) is more suited Ernest Grant Park Graeme J Rawlings Adjacent to busy streets High usage area Playground, sportsfield, skate park and public toilet Thoroughfare by students from adjacent schools and general community Alternate location proposed north east corner of Table Top Road and Thurgoona Drive Dog owner for forty years and regular dog walker Idea of endangering and inconveniencing the local community in order to provide a facility for dogs and their owner is not a fair trade off Council has created a safe and good looking environment at Ernest Grant Park.. No value in changing that when alternative sites are available Joanne Green Pleased that off leash areas are on the agenda at Ernest Grant Park however feel that is will not work due to the busy road Joanne is a Dog owner and would not run her dog here unless the area is fenced Susan Makepeace Serious concerns about the inappropriate location of off leash area at
Attachment 1 - Community Engagement - Summary table of comments received
Ernest Grant Park Primarily due to the use of the area by school children usually unaccompanied going to and from school and the potential conflict between dogs and children. Susan outlines her own experience of a dog attack on a child Potential car accident due to dogs running on the road Need to fence the site Dog faeces already an issue. This is bound to increase if the proposal goes ahead Make Ernest Grant Park a Child friendly Park rather than Dog friendly Dog owner who walks dog on a leash Bernard and Jean Townson Initial phone conversation (Thurgoona Progress Association Resident and part of Thurgoona Progress Association representatives) Sumsion Gardens is good example Main issue is no fencing Thurgoona Drive is very busy road for unfenced dog park Too close to school Thank AlburyCity for considering off leash area as it is long overdue Written comments Area not suitable for the following reasons o Area shown is not fenced o Close to large primary school o Adjoins busy main road where traffic is expected to increase in the near future Kelly Webster (oh behalf of the Raised concerns including Thurgoona Public School P&C) o Safety of children that walk through the area , some unaccompanied o Don’t want to contend with dog faeces on the oval Overall view is that the area is not suitable for an off leash area Anne Nolan A large number of students walk through the park area unaccompanied by parents. Not all know how to respond to an approaching dog and actions may lead to an attack Young children are often scared of dogs and faced with an exited dog may be a traumatic experience The oval is not included in the off leash area however policing will be difficult. The possible increase in dog feaces on the oval would create an increased health risk Traffic and carparking issues accessing Ernst Grant park via Bottlebrush Street Presently toilets are included in leash free area which presents an additional complication If Ernest Grant is to remain a consideration a safer alternative is to fully enclose an area south of the path however would not address increase in traffic flow Tamara Mason Dog Owner Prefers Ernest Grant Park however restricted to southern area as it is away from busy Thurgoona Drive and the area should be fenced to
Attachment 1 - Community Engagement - Summary table of comments received
separate the existing uses (walkers, sporting groups and general use) and the dog area Thurgoona Off Leash Area Janice Daniel Completely against the park being at back fence It is suppose to be a quiet parkland Dog poo issues along pathway next to house will magnify Carparking issues Paul Williams and Wendy Kelly Petition attach (21 signatures) (on behalf of Wills and Guthega Initial meeting Courts) Discussed with neighbours in Wills Court and Guthega Court Thurgoona Does not want to have dogs out the back of his property as it will cause issues for his and his neighbours dogs Dog poo issues in the area already Concerns listed in the Petition Noise Increase traffic in streets Owners leaving dogs in area while they shop Smell of dog faeces that will not be picked up Dogs escaping and running on road causing car accident Dog owners will not put their dogs on leads to take them to the car Privacy of residents backing onto this area Most residents do own dogs and believe an off leash area would be a benefit however do not feel this is an appropriate area Shane and Sharon McKenzie Dog owner Strongly against the proposal to create off leash area as indicated in Thurgoona in a residential and high traffic area Is there a demand from the community? If not why are you pursuing it The location and suitability doesn’t make sense Such a facility is devaluing the Thurgoona Area Tahlia and Adrian Dahmes Property owner in Wills Court Strongly opposed to Thurgoona Drive Parkland proposal Will the fence be directly adjoining the house fences? If so strongly opposed to having dog park directly in property back yard Concerned about children and other pets as this area is a high traffic area to Thurgoona Plaza How do you deal with people leaving their dog unattended in this area whilst they go to the shops What strategies are in place to ensure people are adhering to appropriate supervision of their dogs in this area How often will the area to be attended (Maintenance regime) Leash free area not viewed as a priority Bernard and Jean Townson Written comments (Thurgoona Progress Association More suitable that Ernest Grant Park providing it is securely fenced to representatives) ground level Safety gates at each end of park Adequate water
Attachment 1 - Community Engagement - Summary table of comments received
Car parking would be required Seating would be appreciated Grass area cut and maintained Site should be modelled on Sumsion Gardens in Wodonga Mr & Mrs Smith Area has a major pathway which has increased usage since the opening (late submission) of the new Thurgoona Plaza Outlines other potential issues such as dog barking, dog faeces and Carparking West Albury Off leash area Tracy Michael Regular walker and user of Bonnie Doon Park Play areas with young family Concerned about safety and recreational experiences if the site becomes a off leash area especially around playground equipment Family has had a negative experience with off leash dogs in a playground therefore opposed to any leash free area in close proximity to a playground. Questions the need for a leash free area in West Albury Peter Keamy Observations Bonnie Doon Park is an active zone with Playground, BBQ area, formal and informal sport played on the oval and traffic hazards. Pathways extensively used by walkers, issues with barking dogs at rear of residential properties, Nail Can Hill race finishes here and questions parking space Recommendations Use retention basin at Haydon Park Erect fences to keep dogs away from playground, BBQ, oval and roads. Fences should not block pathways Use Patricia Gould Reserve and have fence running parallel with path K and K Parker Dog owner Information in the draft plan is inadequate and does not take into consideration of multiple regular users of Bonnie Doon Park. At present dogs run off leash through playground, on sportfield and challenge dogs behind fences with no Council intervention There are other areas that would be more suitable Off Leash areas should be screen fenced and well away from residential areas, playgrounds and sport areas Frances and Kevin Murphy Objection to Bonnie Doon Park as a leash free area Assumed that the area would be fence however learnt that it will not be fenced. This is absolutely untenable The area is adjacent to a playground and sportsfield. Parents would not feel safe in bringing children to the playground knowing that dogs may arrive at any time We take our grandchildren to the park frequently but could no longer do this if the plan proceeds Gwen Burr Resident that backs onto the park Concern that the playground and barbecue area are far too close to the
Attachment 1 - Community Engagement - Summary table of comments received
proposed area Limited carparking Dog faeces Strongly believe animals are a part of a family and this area is too confined to be successful Alexandra Park Michael Ferfoglia Dog Owner Commended on foresight and generosity in making land available for dog off leash use Only downside an area that is not fully fenced Provides proposed improvements to Wodonga’s fenced area (water & shade) Outlines reasoning for fully fencing Alexandra Park Leash free area Oddies Creek Park NSW Government Health – Inclusion of lighting Murrumbidgee Local Health Consider making Ebden Street entrance one way with exit point from District parkland opposite Hovell St or Hume Street Encourage the removal of Oddies Creek Park Carpark to reduce hazards to children and dogs Lyn Tymczuk Dogs crossing the path is one issue, perhaps “DOG CROSSING” signs could be erected as majority of dogs swim at same place (near seat along the river bank) Make “DOGS OFF LEASH” signs more prominent to reduce confusion Have barbecue area where dogs are allowed Gordon Street Reserve Lyn Tymczuk People with dogs don’t use this area Its badly kept and just in the wrong spot Any rate payers money spent here is wasted money Springdale Heights/Lavington would be better served if another location was sought NSW Government Health – Eliminate motorcycle use of this area Murrumbidgee Local Health District Logan Road NSW Government Health – Tree planting and installation of shelter for sun protection Murrumbidgee Local Health Inclusion of bridge linking Fredericks Park to the off leash area District Michelle Ave NSW Government Health – Tree planting and possible installation of shelter Murrumbidgee Local Health District
ATTACHMENT 2 – 9F
Draft Albury – A Dog Friendly City Strategy with amendments
DRAFT ALBURY – A DOG FRIENDLY CITY 2012 to 2016 DOC12/77606
Written: 4 October 2012 Endorsed by Council: TBA
AlburyCity DRAFT ALBURY – A DOG FRIENDLY CITY
CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...... 2 INTRODUCTION ...... 3 BACKGROUND ...... 3 STRATEGIC LINKS ...... 3 Albury 2030 ...... 3 Companion Animal Management Plan...... 4 Murray River Experience Master Plan ...... 4 Alexandra Park Master Plan ...... 4 CURRENT SITUATION ANALYSIS ...... 5 Legislation Review ...... 5 Location Analysis ...... 5 Community Demand ...... 5 Review of Existing Service Provision ...... 6 STRATEGY ...... 8 Vision ...... 8 Mission ...... 8 Strategic Objectives ...... 8 Principles ...... 9 Strategic Action 1 - Off Leash Suitability Assessment ...... 9 Strategic Action 2 - Access to Off-Leash Areas ...... 9 Strategic Action 3 - Develop Design Guidelines for Off-Leash Areas ...... 9 Strategic Action 4 - Establish Off-Leash Destination Parks ...... 9 Strategic Action 5 - Assessment of Dog Related Issues at On-Leash Parks ...... 10 Budget ...... 10 Community Engagement and Marketing ...... 10 IMPLEMENTATION ...... 11 MONITORING AND REVIEW ...... 11 APPENDICES ...... 11
Albury - A Dog Friendly City – 2012 to 2016 Page 1 AlburyCity DRAFT ALBURY – A DOG FRIENDLY CITY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The development of a strategy to manage dogs in open spaces provides a strategic direction for AlburyCity to meet the ongoing challenges of providing open space areas suitable for residents of Albury with a companion animal.
The legislative and regulatory obligations on residents and Council interlink with the increasingly high profile issues of dogs barking and aggressive dogs to ensure that the successful management of dogs in open spaces can provide significant benefits to the community while helping to minimise the more harmful aspects of the issue.
Albury – A Dog Friendly City aims to develop an accessible, affordable, inviting and sustainable method of providing open space areas for residents with companion animals without negatively affecting other park users.
There are over 700 hectares of publicly managed open space within Albury which is available for on- leash activities. Additionally there are over 40km of off-road trails available for dog walking activities.
The strategy reassesses the existing five off-leash areas within Albury (Oddies Creek Park, Logan Road Off-Leash Area, Alexandra Park, Gordon St Reserve and Michelle Avenue Off-Leash Area) and proposes an additional three sites to meet demand in areas of the city without current convenient access to an off-leash area. These new sites are located in Ernest Grant Park, or Thurgoona Drive Parkland or in Thurgoona, West Albury (Bonnie Doon Park/Haydon Park) in West Albury and East Albury Mungabareena Reserve in East Albury. Further research will occur to identify a potential site in Thurgoona which can be considered by the community and Council when this strategy is next reviewed.
The development of design guidelines will ensure that each off-leash area within the local government area is provided to an appropriate standard to meet the needs and demands of users. A works program will be developed to gradually raise the standard of the off-leash areas to meet the identified standard.
The strategy has identified the development of the Logan Road Off-Leash Area into a ‘regional’ level off-leash area which will have synergies with the adjacent playground at Fredericks Park and the adjacent facilities at Bunton Park. The continued development of Oddies Creek Park into a ‘district’ level park will see the venue retain its prominence amongst the dog owning community. This will involve the continued delineation between the recently opened Oddies Creek Park Adventure Playspace and the off-leash area.
With the continued growth of Albury, this strategy provides a framework for the continued provision of off-leash open space areas in these future growth areas to ensure that Albury remains a dog-friendly city.
Albury - A Dog Friendly City – 2012 to 2016 Page 2 AlburyCity DRAFT ALBURY – A DOG FRIENDLY CITY
INTRODUCTION
AlburyCity has an obligation to provide open spaces for the community and to provide the opportunity for leisure and recreation within those spaces. With a significant number of Albury residents having companion animals and with the continued development of higher density living spaces, access to open space areas to exercise companion animals is becoming increasingly important.
Providing appropriate exercise for companion animals provides health benefits to the animals and benefits the broader community through improved behaviour by the animals such as reduced barking and reduced aggressiveness.
The ability of residents to exercise their companion animals also ensures that the residents are actively exercising, providing health benefits to the owner. Dog owners are from the full spectrum of society and importantly, significant numbers of people who do not get the opportunity or choose not to exercise, are able to and willing to undertake this form of exercise.
BACKGROUND
AlburyCity has a legislated obligation to provide at least one-off leash area within the community and currently provides five locations throughout the City. Generally, the existing off-leash areas have minimal infrastructure with only Oddies Creek Park providing appropriate infrastructure to attract dog owners. Existing off-leash areas are:
Oddies Creek Park Alexandra Park Logan Road Off-Leash Area Michelle Avenue Off-Leash Area Gordon Street Reserve
STRATEGIC LINKS
Albury 2030
This strategy provides a framework for the continued improvement of off-leash areas within the open space network which will assist in the accomplishment of a number of Albury 2030 outcomes and outcomes including:
Increase tourism to Albury through the development of the Oddies Creek Off-Leash Area. Improve visitors and residents experiences by ensuring off-leash areas are provided to a high quality. Plan and cater for increased population growth through the provision of off-leash areas in growth areas.
Albury - A Dog Friendly City – 2012 to 2016 Page 3 AlburyCity DRAFT ALBURY – A DOG FRIENDLY CITY
Increased usage of bicycle and pedestrian trails through the continued development of facilities with linkages to these trails. Enhance, protect and promote natural assets through the development of guidelines for off- leash areas. Community facilities in Thurgoona through the development of an off-leash area in Thurgoona. Murray River Experience Master Plan through the continued development of Oddies Creek Park.
Companion Animal Management Plan
AlburyCity adopted the Companion Animal Management Plan in 2009, key actions for the Plan included:
Investigate the potential to upgrade leash free areas to provide further options for stimulating and exercising dogs. Investigate the possibility of holding activity days in key leash free areas to promote the use of the facility by dog owners. Continue to incorporate patrols of leash free areas to manage inappropriate use as part of the normal patrolling duties.
The management and development of off-leash areas is a key aspect of the Companion Animal Management Plan. This strategy aims to address one of the key actions identified in the plan includes:
Investigate the potential to upgrade leash free area to provide further options for stimulating and exercising dogs.
Murray River Experience Master Plan
A wetland area and dog beach have been identified as a potential future development stage of Oddies Creek Park in accordance with the Oddies Creek Park Adventure Playspace and the Murray River Experience Master Plan.
Alexandra Park Master Plan
The continuation and upgrade of the off-leash area at Alexandra Park has been identified through the Alexandra Park Master Plan.
Albury - A Dog Friendly City – 2012 to 2016 Page 4 AlburyCity DRAFT ALBURY – A DOG FRIENDLY CITY
CURRENT SITUATION ANALYSIS
Legislation Review
The Companion Animals Act 1998 stipulates requirements on companion animal owners and local authorities.
The Act provides the following direct legislative obligations on AlburyCity in relation to open space areas:
There must be at least one public place in the area of the local authority that is an off-leash area. It is the duty of a local authority for a place that is commonly used for exercising dogs (including an off-leash area) to provide sufficient rubbish receptacles for the proper disposal of the faeces of dogs that defecate in the place.
The Act also provides the following indirect legislative obligations which will impact on AlburyCity in relation to open space:
Dogs are prohibited within 10m of playground equipment. Dogs are prohibited within 10m of food preparation and eating areas such as BBQ’s and picnic tables.
The Act provides a number of additional clauses which will inform the establishment of ‘rules for off- leash areas’.
Location Analysis
The two areas within the Albury LGA not serviced by an off-leash dog park are Thurgoona and West Albury. Following analysis of a number of potential sites, the following sites is are nominated for these areas in the Strategy as an off leaseh area:
Thurgoona - Ernest Grant Park or Thurgoona Drive Parkland. West Albury – Between Bonnie Doon Park and Haydon Park – noting further design and investigation work is required prior to formally designating this site as an off leash area.
A specific off leash area for Thurgoona has not been identified at this time however further investigation and planning will occur to identify a suitable off leash site for consideration at the time of reviewing this strategy.
Community Demand
Additional off leash areas are not in great demand however the one area where there has been community feedback about making the area off leash is at Mungabareena Reserve in East Albury.
Albury - A Dog Friendly City – 2012 to 2016 Page 5 AlburyCity DRAFT ALBURY – A DOG FRIENDLY CITY
There has also been community feedback that the existing off-leash areas require improved facilities for users.
Review of Existing Service Provision
Oddies Creek Park Off-Leash Area
Size: 2.55 hectares
Advantages
Dog swimming area Access to drinking water (tap with container) Good amenities Well maintained Centrally located Pleasant area for people Connected to Wagirra Trail Various shaded areas
Disadvantages
Parking can be difficult when playground is busy Constant traffic is a hazard Pedestrian traffic, especially children, conflicts of use Small dogs can fit through fence of playground Access to the river is across the Wagirra Trail
Alexandra Park Off-Leash Area Size: 2.71 hectares
Advantages
Part of a large open space area Linked to Albury/Thurgoona Trail Various shaded areas Located in a residential area
Disadvantages
Adjacent to busy roads No access to drinking water Lacks infrastructure Not mown regularly enough
Albury - A Dog Friendly City – 2012 to 2016 Page 6 AlburyCity DRAFT ALBURY – A DOG FRIENDLY CITY
Logan Road Off-Leash Area Size: 1.16 hectares
Advantages
Large open space Secure boundary on three sides Linked to Bungambrawatha Creek Trail Located in residential area
Disadvantages
Although a large area it is narrow Adjacent to a busy road No access to drinking water Limited shade trees
Michelle Avenue Off-Leash Area Size: 1.30 hectares
Advantages
Pleasant area, fairly quiet Linked to Bungambrawatha Creek Trail
Disadvantages
Located next to playground Not much parking Boundaries of off-leash are not clearly defined Limited shaded areas
Gordon Street Reserve Off-Leash Area Size: 1.10 hectares
Advantages
Centralised location to local neighbourhood
Disadvantages
Not linked with other areas Motorbike traffic goes through area
Albury - A Dog Friendly City – 2012 to 2016 Page 7 AlburyCity DRAFT ALBURY – A DOG FRIENDLY CITY
Limited shaded areas
See Appendix #1 for imagery of each area and proposed improvements.
In recent years a number of issues have been identified through community feedback and consultation which this strategy will address. These include:
Management of shared use between Oddies Creek Adventure Playspace and Oddies Creek Park Off-Leash Area The use of Mungabareena Reserve as an off-leash despite it not having off-leash status The use of fenced sporting fields as off-leash areas The lack of off-leash areas in Thurgoona The quality of the existing off-leash areas Conflicting signage at Noreuil Park Foreshore
STRATEGY
Vision
To establish fair and consistent criteria to ensure that all park users will be able to choose a park experience that could include dogs off leash, dogs on leash, or no dogs at all and to ensure that off- leash areas are provided to a high quality to support a growing population.
Mission
To recognise that animals are part of the community, contributing to its quality of life, and to ensure that the needs of animals and their owners are accommodated while recognising the differing needs of non animal owners of the community.
Strategic Objectives
The strategy ensures access to some parks for dog owners as well as freedom from dogs where parks, parts of parks, or park activities are not compatible with the presence of dogs.
To develop a process to determine appropriate levels of access to open space areas for dogs. Provide recommendations concerning access to open space for dogs within the LGA to be implemented through this strategy and Council’s open space planning processes. Investigate the feasibility of the development of a destination dog park. To develop a level of service to be provided at off-leash parks and considered at other high use parks such as waste facilities for dog owners eg dog bags, dispensers and disposal facilities, provisions for water bowls To manage issues including human/dog conflict, heath benefits of pet ownership, faeces control, animal health, and animal behaviour.
Albury - A Dog Friendly City – 2012 to 2016 Page 8 AlburyCity DRAFT ALBURY – A DOG FRIENDLY CITY
Principles
Accessible – ensure off-leash areas are accessible for everyone and everyone has equal rights. Affordable – ensure upgrades provide value for money. Inviting – ensure off-leash areas draw people to use them. Sustainable – ensure conflicts with environmental and cultural considerations are minimised.
Strategic Action 1 - Off Leash Suitability Assessment a) Undertake a risk assessment of each off-leash area and each proposed off-leash area (Appendix 2). b) Assess historical issues with complaints within each off-leash areas. c) Assess the current and forecast usage of each area. d) Assess the environmental considerations at each area.
Strategic Action 2 - Access to Off-Leash Areas a) Further investigate and plan for Develop an off-leash area at in Thurgoona (Ernest Grant Park (Appendix 3), or Thurgoona Drive Parkland (Appendix 4), Thurgoona. b) Develop an off-leash area in West Albury (between Haydon Park and Bonnie Doon Park), West Albury (Appendix 5) following further design and investigation work. c) Develop an off-leash area at Mungabareena Reserve, East Albury (Appendix 6). d) Monitor the demand for off-leash areas in future growth areas.
Strategic Action 3 - Develop Design Guidelines for Off-Leash Areas a) Develop design guidelines for off-leash areas within a local, district and regional framework (See Appendix 7). b) Analyse the shortfall within existing off-leash areas against these guidelines. c) Develop a works program to develop existing off-leash areas up to the design guidelines. d) Develop concept plans for all existing and proposed off-leash areas.
Strategic Action 4 - Establish Off-Leash Destination Parks a) Develop Logan Road Off-Leash Area into a ‘destination’ off-leash regional level park. b) Develop Oddies Creek Park into a ‘destination’ district level park.
Albury - A Dog Friendly City – 2012 to 2016 Page 9 AlburyCity DRAFT ALBURY – A DOG FRIENDLY CITY
Strategic Action 5 - Assessment of Dog Related Issues at On-Leash Parks a) Instigate a trial to allow dog access (on-leash) at Noreuil Park Foreshore. b) Review dog access at sporting grounds with the view to reduce this type of usage. c) Review facilities and signage at on-leash parks from a companion animal perspective.
Budget
It is anticipated that short-term budget expenditure will be within the operating budget with additional items to be considered in future delivery programs.
Community Engagement and Marketing
The basis for this strategy has been developed in conjunction with the Companion Animals Management Panel who provide representation for the broader community in relation to companion animals. The strategy identifies actions to further develop the location, management and quality of open space areas for both off-leash and on-leash activities.
The draft strategy was presented to Council in October 2012 will be presented to Council and then placed on public display for consultation for at least 28 days in accordance with the standard AlburyCity procedure including:
providing information at the Albury Library/Museum, Lavington Library and Council Administration Building; advertising in the local media; and providing information on the AlburyCity website.
In addition, working in conjunction with AlburyCity’s compliance staff and the Companion Animal Management Advisory Panel, the draft strategy was will be distributed to all key stakeholders with an interest in responsible pet ownership and dogs in open spaces. Information was will also be distributed in the following ways:
Providing information about the strategy at AlburyCity’s Pets Day Out in November 2012. Providing information at AlburyCity Community Centres. Information being provided at the AlburyCity Animal Management Centre. Distribution to residents directly adjacent to the sites identified in the strategy.
Comments received through the Community Engagement process are summarised and included in Appendix 8 – Community Engagement Summary
Albury - A Dog Friendly City – 2012 to 2016 Page 10 AlburyCity DRAFT ALBURY – A DOG FRIENDLY CITY
IMPLEMENTATION
An implementation plan which prioritises d actions from the Strategy has been developed. Appendix 9 outlines the actions in priority order. plan will be developed following the consultation period and final adoption by Council.
MONITORING AND REVIEW
The Companion Animal Management Advisory Panel will be responsible for monitoring and advising on the success of Albury – A Dog Friendly City. Additionally, participation numbers will be used to assess the usage of the parks. The strategy will be updated every five three years or as required by legislative changes.
AlburyCity’s Parks and Recreation and Compliance teams will be responsible for delivery of this strategy.
APPENDICES
1. Maps of existing off-leash areas 2. Off-Leash Suitability Assessment 3. Proposed Ernest Grant Park, Thurgoona Off-Leash Area 4. Proposed Thurgoona Drive Parkland Off-Leash Area 5. Proposed West Albury Off-Leash Area 6. Proposed Mungabareena Reserve Off-Leash Area 7. Off-Leash Area Design Guidelines 8. Community Engagement - Summary table of Comments received 9. Prioritised Implementation Plan
Albury - A Dog Friendly City – 2012 to 2016 Page 11
APPENDIX 1 – Maps of existing off-leash areas
APPENDIX 2 - OFF LEASH SUITABILITY ASSESSMENT
Risk Assessment Is the area utilized by children? Is the area secure from a road, motorists and pedestrians? Are there risks or hazards evident to users of this reserve
Nuisance Created by Animals Is the area a designated recreation area eg picnic or BBQ area or community reserve? Is the area secure from other adjacent properties and the road? Are there facilities for dogs eg dog waste bags and dispensers? Does there need to be times that dogs are restricted from sporting ovals due to sporting commitments on the reserve? Will dog faeces be an issue for the sporting requirements eg history of oval and picking up after dogs and can they be effectively managed with the use of dog waste bag and dispensers? Is the reserve located adjacent residential housing and the likelihood of a nuisance being created by barking or uncontrolled dogs?
Usage of Reserve Is the reserve located within a moderate to high density population area (people and dogs)? Is the reserve located within convenient access for dog owners? Is the reserve a dog friendly area eg is the reserve a grassed area or a hard court? Does it meet the needs of the community? Is there easy access to the reserve for community members?
Environmental Consideration Areas of significant environmental sensitivity Are other open space areas adjacent defined by other animal management strategies eg national parks and dogs on leashes? Are there other reserve areas within close proximity that are better suited as dog friendly areas with less impact on areas of significant environmental sensitivity.
APPENDIX 3 – Proposed Ernest Grant Park, Thurgoona off-leash area
APPENDIX 4 – Proposed Thurgoona Drive Parkland off-leash area
APPENDIX 5 – Proposed West Albury off-leash Area
APPENDIX 6 – Proposed Mungabareena Reserve off-leash area
APPENDIX 7 – Off-Leash Area Design Guidelines
DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR OFF-LEASH AREAS
Local Park Off-Leash Area District Park Off-Leash Area Regional Park Off-Leash Area Parks Included Gordon Street Reserve Off-Leash Area Oddies Creek Park Off-Leash Area Logan Road Off-Leash Park Alexandra Park Off-Leash Area Michelle Avenue Off-Leash Area Preferred Size 1 hectare unfenced (minimum) 1 hectare unfenced (minimum) and/or 1 hectare fenced (minimum) and basic basic agility/play equipment agility/play equipment Location Central to a neighbourhood Prominent location for a large part of the A central location, accessible for all city. AlburyCity residents and accessible to tourists. Shade Shade trees with a particular focus on Shade trees with a particular focus on Significant shade trees. May also the people hub. the people hub. include a shelter. Seating Capacity 4 (two seats) 12 (four seats and picnic table) 20 (6 seats and two picnic tables) Agility / Play Equipment None Possibly Yes Signage Required At primary entrances At all entrances At all entrances and within the facility Fencing None Generally none, informal boundaries Yes, double gate at all entrances such as tree planting may be incorporated. Ground Surface Grass Grass, possibly may incorporate Grass, possibly may incorporate alternative surfaces for interest. alternative surfaces for interest. Lighting None None None Pathways Will be linked to the trail network where Will be linked to the trail network. Will be linked to the trail network and possible. will contain pathways within the park. Car Parking None specifically. Likely to be roadside There should be sufficient car parking; There should be sufficient car parking; car parks available. this may be roadside car parks, nearby this may be roadside car parks, nearby car parking or a dedicated car park. car parking or a dedicated car park. Water Drinking water will be available Drinking water will be available Drinking water will be available Waste Disposal Poo bags and bins will be provided Poo bags and bins will be provided Poo bags and bins will be provided Public Toilets None May be provided if usage dictates the May be provided if usage dictates the need for it. need for it.
It is proposed that the proposed new off-leash areas be categorised as follows: Thurgoona – Ernest Grant Park – Local Thurgoona – Thurgoona Drive Parkland – District West Albury – Bonnie Doon/Haydon Park – Local East Albury – Mungabareena Reserve – Local
APPENDIX 8 - Community Engagement - Summary table of comments received
RESIDENT SUMMARY OF ISSUES General NSW Government Health – Strong support for the strategy Murrumbidgee Local Health Upgrading of five existing off leash areas by providing drinking water, District seating shade, bag dispensers and bins Developing Logan Road off leash area as a regional Off leash Park Linking off leash areas with pathways/trails Strongly urge the inclusion of public toilets in all areas Include off leash areas on trails map and well communicate the links to encourage the use of these areas and physical activity Mungabareena Reserve Ray Williams Off leash area should be away from such a beautiful area. Lack of patrols leads to unauthorised use of the area by dog owners The area should be contained (fenced) so that dogs are not allowed to be uncontrolled Ideally the area should be well away from the river Tracy Michael Supportive of site Anna Kaye Support more off leash areas particularly pleasant “people - friendly” surrounds as they are more likely to be used Mungabareena is prime example however a fair amount of beautification is required Live close to Alexandra Park however would prefer Mungabareena Reserve
Lyn Tymczuk In favour of this site The site chosen at Mungabareena Reserve is dangerous the current is too strong here, banks are too steep and water entry is limited by trees Perhaps an area downstream near Doctors Point entry (just up from boat ramp) is more suited Ernest Grant Park Graeme J Rawlings Adjacent to busy streets High usage area Playground, sportsfield, skate park and public toilet Thoroughfare by students from adjacent schools and general community Alternate location proposed north east corner of Table Top Road and Thurgoona Drive Dog owner for forty years and regular dog walker Idea of endangering and inconveniencing the local community in order to provide a facility for dogs and their owner is not a fair trade off Council has created a safe and good looking environment at Ernest Grant Park.. No value in changing that when alternative sites are available Joanne Green Pleased that off leash areas are on the agenda at Ernest Grant Park however feel that is will not work due to the busy road Joanne is a Dog owner and would not run her dog here unless the area is fenced Susan Makepeace Serious concerns about the inappropriate location of off leash area at
APPENDIX 8 - Community Engagement - Summary table of comments received
Ernest Grant Park Primarily due to the use of the area by school children usually unaccompanied going to and from school and the potential conflict between dogs and children. Susan outlines her own experience of a dog attack on a child Potential car accident due to dogs running on the road Need to fence the site Dog faeces already an issue. This is bound to increase if the proposal goes ahead Make Ernest Grant Park a Child friendly Park rather than Dog friendly Dog owner who walks dog on a leash Bernard and Jean Townson Initial phone conversation (Thurgoona Progress Association Resident and part of Thurgoona Progress Association representatives) Sumsion Gardens is good example Main issue is no fencing Thurgoona Drive is very busy road for unfenced dog park Too close to school Thank AlburyCity for considering off leash area as it is long overdue Written comments Area not suitable for the following reasons o Area shown is not fenced o Close to large primary school o Adjoins busy main road where traffic is expected to increase in the near future Kelly Webster (oh behalf of the Raised concerns including Thurgoona Public School P&C) o Safety of children that walk through the area , some unaccompanied o Don’t want to contend with dog faeces on the oval Overall view is that the area is not suitable for an off leash area Anne Nolan A large number of students walk through the park area unaccompanied by parents. Not all know how to respond to an approaching dog and actions may lead to an attack Young children are often scared of dogs and faced with an exited dog may be a traumatic experience The oval is not included in the off leash area however policing will be difficult. The possible increase in dog feaces on the oval would create an increased health risk Traffic and carparking issues accessing Ernst Grant park via Bottlebrush Street Presently toilets are included in leash free area which presents an additional complication If Ernest Grant is to remain a consideration a safer alternative is to fully enclose an area south of the path however would not address increase in traffic flow Tamara Mason Dog Owner Prefers Ernest Grant Park however restricted to southern area as it is away from busy Thurgoona Drive and the area should be fenced to
APPENDIX 8 - Community Engagement - Summary table of comments received
separate the existing uses (walkers, sporting groups and general use) and the dog area Thurgoona Off Leash Area Janice Daniel Completely against the park being at back fence It is suppose to be a quiet parkland Dog poo issues along pathway next to house will magnify Carparking issues Paul Williams and Wendy Kelly Petition attach (21 signatures) (on behalf of Wills and Guthega Initial meeting Courts) Discussed with neighbours in Wills Court and Guthega Court Thurgoona Does not want to have dogs out the back of his property as it will cause issues for his and his neighbours dogs Dog poo issues in the area already Concerns listed in the Petition Noise Increase traffic in streets Owners leaving dogs in area while they shop Smell of dog faeces that will not be picked up Dogs escaping and running on road causing car accident Dog owners will not put their dogs on leads to take them to the car Privacy of residents backing onto this area Most residents do own dogs and believe an off leash area would be a benefit however do not feel this is an appropriate area Shane and Sharon McKenzie Dog owner Strongly against the proposal to create off leash area as indicated in Thurgoona in a residential and high traffic area Is there a demand from the community? If not why are you pursuing it The location and suitability doesn’t make sense Such a facility is devaluing the Thurgoona Area Tahlia and Adrian Dahmes Property owner in Wills Court Strongly opposed to Thurgoona Drive Parkland proposal Will the fence be directly adjoining the house fences? If so strongly opposed to having dog park directly in property back yard Concerned about children and other pets as this area is a high traffic area to Thurgoona Plaza How do you deal with people leaving their dog unattended in this area whilst they go to the shops What strategies are in place to ensure people are adhering to appropriate supervision of their dogs in this area How often will the area to be attended (Maintenance regime) Leash free area not viewed as a priority Bernard and Jean Townson Written comments (Thurgoona Progress Association More suitable that Ernest Grant Park providing it is securely fenced to representatives) ground level Safety gates at each end of park Adequate water
APPENDIX 8 - Community Engagement - Summary table of comments received
Car parking would be required Seating would be appreciated Grass area cut and maintained Site should be modelled on Sumsion Gardens in Wodonga Mr & Mrs Smith Area has a major pathway which has increased usage since the opening (late submission) of the new Thurgoona Plaza Outlines other potential issues such as dog barking, dog faeces and Carparking West Albury Off leash area Tracy Michael Regular walker and user of Bonnie Doon Park Play areas with young family Concerned about safety and recreational experiences if the site becomes a off leash area especially around playground equipment Family has had a negative experience with off leash dogs in a playground therefore opposed to any leash free area in close proximity to a playground. Questions the need for a leash free area in West Albury Peter Keamy Observations Bonnie Doon Park is an active zone with Playground, BBQ area, formal and informal sport played on the oval and traffic hazards. Pathways extensively used by walkers, issues with barking dogs at rear of residential properties, Nail Can Hill race finishes here and questions parking space Recommendations Use retention basin at Haydon Park Erect fences to keep dogs away from playground, BBQ, oval and roads. Fences should not block pathways Use Patricia Gould Reserve and have fence running parallel with path K and K Parker Dog owner Information in the draft plan is inadequate and does not take into consideration of multiple regular users of Bonnie Doon Park. At present dogs run off leash through playground, on sportfield and challenge dogs behind fences with no Council intervention There are other areas that would be more suitable Off Leash areas should be screen fenced and well away from residential areas, playgrounds and sport areas Frances and Kevin Murphy Objection to Bonnie Doon Park as a leash free area Assumed that the area would be fence however learnt that it will not be fenced. This is absolutely untenable The area is adjacent to a playground and sportsfield. Parents would not feel safe in bringing children to the playground knowing that dogs may arrive at any time We take our grandchildren to the park frequently but could no longer do this if the plan proceeds Gwen Burr Resident that backs onto the park Concern that the playground and barbecue area are far too close to the
APPENDIX 8 - Community Engagement - Summary table of comments received
proposed area Limited carparking Dog faeces Strongly believe animals are a part of a family and this area is too confined to be successful Alexandra Park Michael Ferfoglia Dog Owner Commended on foresight and generosity in making land available for dog off leash use Only downside an area that is not fully fenced Provides proposed improvements to Wodonga’s fenced area (water & shade) Outlines reasoning for fully fencing Alexandra Park Leash free area Oddies Creek Park NSW Government Health – Inclusion of lighting Murrumbidgee Local Health Consider making Ebden Street entrance one way with exit point from District parkland opposite Hovell St or Hume Street Encourage the removal of Oddies Creek Park Carpark to reduce hazards to children and dogs Lyn Tymczuk Dogs crossing the path is one issue, perhaps “DOG CROSSING” signs could be erected as majority of dogs swim at same place (near seat along the river bank) Make “DOGS OFF LEASH” signs more prominent to reduce confusion Have barbecue area where dogs are allowed Gordon Street Reserve Lyn Tymczuk People with dogs don’t use this area Its badly kept and just in the wrong spot Any rate payers money spent here is wasted money Springdale Heights/Lavington would be better served if another location was sought NSW Government Health – Eliminate motorcycle use of this area Murrumbidgee Local Health District Logan Road NSW Government Health – Tree planting and installation of shelter for sun protection Murrumbidgee Local Health Inclusion of bridge linking Fredericks Park to the off leash area District Michelle Ave NSW Government Health – Tree planting and possible installation of shelter Murrumbidgee Local Health District
APPENDIX 9 - ALBURY – A DOG FRIENDLY CITY - IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
The Strategy outlines the deficiencies in some of the existing off leash areas from an aesthetic and functional point of view. Improving existing off leash areas with additional infrastructure and signage should be a high priority. Providing inviting off leash areas should address some of the issues of inappropriate use of other open space areas.
There are five Strategic Actions outlined in the document. A review of these actions has been undertaken. The priority order for actions is:
1. Strategic Action 5 Assessment of Dog related Issues at On-Leash Parks (a-c)
2. Strategic Action 3 – Develop Design Guidelines for Off Leash areas (a-c) No comments were received regarding these guidelines therefore they can be used to develop concept plans (Strategic Action 3d) for each existing off leash area with an associated improvement plan.
3. Strategic Action 4 – Establish ‘destination’ Off Leash regional level Park (a) Identified as Logan Road Off Leash Area
4. Strategic Action 2 Access to Off Leash Area (c) – Mungabareena Reserve
5. Strategic Action 1 – Off Leash Suitability Assessment (a-d) This is to be undertaken for the proposed sites. Comments received through this process to determine the most appropriate site and layout for Thurgoona and the ultimate layout for Bonnie Doon Park. Concept plans can then be developed for new sites (Strategic Action 3d).
6. Strategic Action 2 Access to Off Leash Area (b) – West Albury
7. Strategic Action 2 Access to Off Leash Area (a) – Thurgoona
8. Strategic Action 4 – Establish ‘destination’ off Leash district level park (b) Identified as Oddies Creek Park
9. Strategic Action 2 Access to Off Leash Area (d) – Monitor demand in future growth areas
ATTACHMENT 3 – 9F
Submissions Received (to be tabled at the meeting)
ATTACHMENT TO CM 9G – 02/2013
AIRPORT LOT BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT
ATTACHMENT 1 – 9G
DP837400
ATTACHMENT 2 – 9G
Proposed Plan of Subdivision
ATTACHMENT 3 – 9G
Photo Backed Plan headed Airport Subdivision
D
A
O
R
15
A DRIVE IRPORT
T
38 E
E
R
T E
S V I
R R
D E
V
I 39 U
OGD EN PLACE 40
T
R
O
P
R DALTO I N A N PLA O CE
L
A
V
A
AY HW HIG LEGEND
Public Road Existing Lot Proposed Lot NA RI VE RI
DISCLAIMER Whilst all care has been taken in the preparation of this cadastral base map, AlburyCity accepts no responsibility for the accuracy of any information show n. Users should rely on their ow n enquirie s in orde r to validate informatio n show n on this map. AIRPORT SUBDIVISION AlburyCity ------Copyright Reserved. MAP GRID AU STRALIA, ZON E 55 SCALE: 1:2000 TRANSVERSE MERCATOR PROJECTION 20 10 0 20 40 HOR IZONTAL DATUM: GEODETIC DATUM AU STRALIA 1994 DRAWN: R. M ilton VERTICAL DATUM: AUSTRALIAN HEIGHT DATUM 1 972 PR OD UCED by The Mapping Section, Engineering Services Meters AlburyCity Group, AlburyC ity. DATE: 15/02/2013
ATTACHMENT 4 – 9G
Draft 88B Instrument